Wednesday, July 29, 2026
Home Blog Page 624

El Salvador’s Funes seeks to reassure

by the El Reportero’s news service

Mauricio FumesMauricio Fumes

El Salvador’s president-elect, Mauricio Funes, reiterated on March 16, that he would not align himself with Venezuela’s leftwing President Hugo Chávez and his socialist “Bolivarian Revolution.”

It is clear that maintaining close U.S. ties will be a top priority for El Salvador’s newly elected leftist president, who met with U.S. embassy officials soon after stripping power from the ruling conservative party, which had enjoyed 20 years at the helm and a solid alliance with Washington, wrote The Miami Herald.

Mauricio Funes of the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front, or FMLN — a former guerrilla movement — met with U.S. Embassy Charges d’Affaires Robert Blau after declaring victory in a raucous election that split the nation between those who support continuity over a new face in the political spectrum.

According to the results announced by the Supreme Electoral Court (TSE), Funes won 51.26 percent of the votes, while his rival Rodrigo Avila was supported by 48.74 percent.

David Munguia, a Funes security advisor and former colonel in the Salvadoran army, said the president elect has sent clear messages he will maintain close U.S. ties.

‘’These messages will allow us to build a government that doesn’t seek confrontation,’’ said Munguia, who is part of Funes’ 12-member transition team. First contact is to be made this week with a visit by U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Thomas Shannon.

Funes, who will took power on June 1, is facing huge challenges, but the most important ones are to reduce poverty and violence.

Mexico moves up U.S. priority list

Mexico’s president Felipe Calderón Hinojosa and his government do not seem to know whether to be pleased or horrifi ed that the US government is taking such an interest in what is happening in Mexico. There is an awkward awareness, on both sides of the border, of the U.S.’s history of ignoring the Mexican government when the US feels that military action has to be taken in Mexico.

A delightful sense of Schadenfreude

Latin American bankers and regulators would be less than human if they did not feel a tingle of Schadenfreude at the problems to hit the world’s big banks. For years, U.S. and European bankers and regulators have lectured the region about the importance of living within its means and matching assets and liabilities.

Latin American bankers and regulators have practiced what was preached at them and, as a result, the region’s fi nancial systems look in good shape.

Regional defense council launches amid renewed tension

The Defense Council of the Union of South American Nations (Unasur) was launched this week in Santiago de Chile. The timing of the launch was significant. Just over one year ago, a cross-border incursion by Colombian troops to destroy an encampment of the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FAR) in Ecuador sparked a ­diplomatic crisis with Ecuador and Venezuela. Tension is still running high, and there is no immediate prospect of Ecuador restoring diplomatic relations with Colombia. Injudicious remarks by Colombia’s defense minister, Juan Manuel Santos, last week prompted a disproportionate response from Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa and Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez.

Farc and drugs scandal rattles Ecuador as elections loom

An investigation into a cocaine shipment seized in 2007 has revealed hitherto unreported contacts between a senior offi cial from the government of President Rafael Correa and the ex number-two leader of the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) almost up to the eve of the Colombian raid on his camp inside Ecuador in which he was killed. Its ramifi cations, which have already affected a regional human rights NGO, could prove damaging to Correa in the run-up to the 26 April general elections.

spot_img

Local governments press for fast action to address federal immigration failures

by Anne Wake Field

An influential new force has joined the expanding lineup of frustrated and angry critics of the federal government for its repeated failures to undo this nation’s widening immigration mess.

After digesting an extensive study covering the impact of federal inaction on local government entities, which it ordered last year, and conferring with a cross-section of its membership and officers, the International City/County Management Association is circulating its findings and recommendations to the Obama administration and Congress.

ICMA serves 9,000 municipal and county jurisdictions throughout the world. Its management decisions, it maintains, ‘’affect 185 million individuals living in thousands of communities, from small villages and towns to large metropolitan areas.”

The Washington, D.C.-based organization is calling on U.S. political powerbrokers to heed the findings of its report by incorporating four principles into a comprehensive U.S. immigration strategy:

  1. Overhaul U.S. policy to reflect current (continued on page economic and social realities, including appropriate enforcement.
  2. Place control at the national level and immigrant integration at the local level.
  3. Conduct federal enforcement that considers the impact on communities and local governments and promotes human rights.
  4. Redistribute resources equitably that are generated by immigrants.

ICMA deputy executive director Elizabeth Kellar told Hispanic Link News Service and other participating media during a March 5 teleconference, “The absence of a comprehensive approach creates public health and safety issues for our country. Local government managers see the consequences of a patchwork approach to immigration in their communities every day.”

The report, “Immigration Reform: An Intergovernmental Imperative,” stated that the current piecemeal efforts jeopardize the safety and security of citizens and immigrants alike, while imposing significant burdens on the economic and social fabric of localities.

Additionally, it said, the confusion creates intergovernmental tensions that may impede effective working relations on other issues.

Nadia Rubaii-Barrett, the report’s author, elaborated during the teleconference, “To be competitive in an increasingly interdependent and connected world, the United States needs to articulate and implement a comprehensive and coordinated intergovernmental strategy to maximize the benefits of immigrants and minimize the dangers and costs of uncontrolled immigration.

Two affected local officials also spoke, sharing their “on-the-ground” experiences.

Arlington County, Va., manager Ron Carlee emphasized local governments “must set the tone for a welcoming, tolerant and inclusive environment.

“Otherwise, there is a danger of unintended consequences from exclusion.

Creating a culture of fear and distrust of law enforcement makes a community less safe.

Denying educational opportunities to students who may continue to live in this county makes a community less safe. Denying such basic services as well as baby care, immunizations and treatment of communicable diseases makes a community less safe.”

Michael (Dave) O’Leary, city administrator of Shelton, Washington, added, “The idea is to build trust so we can get people to report crimes and then bring violators to justice. This is hard work. Many immigrants have come from places where law enforcement is to be feared. Over time, we have made progress. Occasionally, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel come to town and conduct surprise arrests. Our city is caught between the goals of our national government enforcing immigration laws and those of our local government protecting people. Immigrants tend to see law enforcement as one entity. When ICE does its work, it undermines ours”.

Concluded report author Rubaii-Barrett, Department of Public Administration chair at Binghamton University’s College of Community and Public Affairs, ­“Professional local government administrators, who see on a daily basis the potential for positive immigrant contributions to their communities and the negative economic and social consequences of the current failed policies, understand that a comprehensive immigration strategy must begin with a clearly articulated division of responsibilities and the establishment and enforcement of sensible immigration policies that meet the economic and social needs of the 21st century without sacrificing security.” Hispanic Link.

spot_img

Helping the gansters next door

­

by José de la Isla

José de la IslaJosé de la Isla

HOUSTON — Mexico’s biggest national security problem stems from its fight with drug cartels. Its domestic body count of nearly 6,000 people last year has sounded the alarm. Prominently listed among the grizzly assassinations were gangsters, police, and journalists, members of the military and government officials, plus a multitude of collateral victims.

Arturo Sarukhan, Mexico’s ambassador to the United States, argues that the current violence is a blow-back following the squeeze that government has put on the drug cartels. The criminals are murdering each other over trade routes. The head of Mexico’s national defense commission of the Chamber of Deputies Jorge González Betancourt says his country wants the United States to share more information, stop arms trading, control money laundering and curtail consumer demand for drugs if his country is to gain the upper hand in the fight.

These expressions follow a U.S. State Department warning about travel in Mexico. Texas Gov. Rick Perry has called on the Department of Homeland Security to send a thousand troops to the Mexican border.

“I don’t care whether they are military troops, or National Guard troops or whether they are customs agents,” said the governor. His concern is that Mexico’s drug war may be spilling into U.S. territory. Some of the worry comes from a Homeland Security report that six drug cartel-related kidnappings have occurred in El Paso, Texas, across the border from Ciudad Juárez, where the infamous Sinaloa Cartel is fighting to maintain its franchise to supply this country.

The only problem is that when NewspaperTree.com reporter David Crowder checked, the El Paso police had no record of any such kidnappings, except possibly

one.

Another story circulating has it that Cd. Juárez Mayor José Reyes Ferriz has moved his family to El Paso. It’s true that the mayor owns a house in El Paso. So did the previous Juárez mayor.

Bad is bad enough without embellishments, and hysteria isn’t a good way to cope with the matter.

Our own officials need to get a grip. Wasn’t it this kind of mentality that got us into, say, the Iraq debacle?

Some of the justification for our shimmies comes from a U.S. military preparedness report that included a “worst case” scenario on what could occur if Mexico’s or Pakistan’s governments failed and either or both became a “failed state.”…

In a parallel way, some bankers have argued that our current financial crisis happened because Wall Street never simulated a worst-case scenario. If we had, would that have meant that, by our own standards, the U.S. is a failed state?

Back in 2005 the Dominican Republic was declared a failed state in another report.

Then the United States passed the Central American Free Trade Agreement, which included that nation. So, by our own practice, the designation “failed state” could mean be a reason for “trading partner.”

U.S. Rep. Lamar Smith, from Texas, has stated that drug-related violence is turning some communities there back into “the Wild West.’” And Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut is calling for hearings later this month on border violence.

A better reason for hearings would be to address the recommendations in a November 2008 Brookings Institution report. Its study group, headed by former Mexico president Ernesto Zedillo and former U.S. Under Secretary of State Thomas Pickering, asked us to ratify the United Nation’s protocol against the illicit manufacture and trafficking in firearms, gun parts and ammunition.

If we want to get hysterical over Mexico’s violence, we should crack down on the gunrunning, originating with us, that is abetting the gangsters next door.

(José de la Isla, author of The Rise of Hispanic Political Power (Archer Books, 2003) writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service. He may be contacted by e-mail at ­joseisla3@yahoo.com). © 2009

spot_img

The great banking fraud is a shame

by Marvin Ramírez

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin J. Ram­íre­z­­

­For those families who are losing their home every day because of the fraud committed against them, my most sincere condolence for them.

Most of you, borrowers, were lied to by the banksters. The same ones who print the money control the interest rate, control the inflation and deflation, and set all the money rules: the Federal Reserve Bank. We are trapped by them. All of us.

What we are paid for our services and wages is not real money. Money is based by gold and silver, according to the U.S. Constitution. What we earn now is a piece of paper with an imaginary value, which if you don’t use it quickly, it will vanish.

And if the creators decide to devaluate it next week, then you might lose part of its value immediately to inflation. And who keeps the value that you lose? It doesn’t evaporate into the air, for sure.

You see, all the ‘money’ in circulation is lent to the government every year, based on the budget proposal that every government entity submits to the U.S. Congress, their State Assembly, or their City Council or Supervisors, for the following fiscal year. It’s been so since the Great Depression.

What you hear that we owe now days as a nation, is the so called National Debt, which according to documents, Congress and the Federal Reserve made a contract, which states that only the interest would be payable, not the principal. So, when we work, we get paid with phony money that we can’t save for our next generation, while the banksters (the elite), get pay with the nation’s gold, real money, which they use to buy islands, prime real estate, and so on. That’s why they are so powerful. They own most of the land in the world.

Meanwhile, you and me, those who ‘buy’ a house, have to use credit, because there is no money in circulation since 1933. The United States Congress removed the gold standard – the real money – and left our government borrowing since then, and the elite want us to keep us borrowing until it destroy us.

So if you ever wondered why we all – rich and poor – have to borrow money for almost everything, is because of that. That is why banks don’t work with cash. They use Promissory Notes, a document with borrowers’ signature, while we the people are forced to use Federal Reserved Notes (or green dollars).

And unless you are a banker, you cannot understand how the banking system works, as most people rely on their local real estate agent, who, with his or her selling skills, make the sale as quick as possible.

­The papers are signed, the seller says sign here, the buyer looks for the spot to be signed, and the deal is closed. Congratulations for your new house.

But is it your house for real? Of course not. It belongs to the government, which use it as collateral for the money it borrows.

This is the work of an elite who rules us all, and who have made us their slaves.

spot_img

Community prevents foreclosed house from being auctioned

by Marvin Ramírez

With the help of members of ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), Armando Ramos and Fernanda Cardenas's: foreclosed home, which has already been foreclosed, was successfully spared from being sold in an auction on the steps of of the Alameda County Courthouse in Oakland. In the photo below, a young man representing the auctioning OCWEN company leaves afterWith the help of members of ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), Armando Ramos and Fernanda Cardenas’s foreclosed home, which has already been foreclosed, was successfully spared from being sold in an auction on the steps of of the Alameda County Courthouse in Oakland. In the photo below, a young man representing the auctioning OCWEN compa­ny leaves after failing to auction the house. (photo by Marvin J. Ramirez)

As foreclosures continue to inflict their devastating effects on families – especially hard-hit Hispanic and African-American households who live under a stage of fear waiting for the day when the sheriff comes and put a lock on their house – many are fighting back with a little help from ACORN, with a new strategy.

It’s not the first time that the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), that uses laud protests when an auction is about to take place.

The law says that a public auction must take place on the stairs of the courthouse, at the main entrance, and it must be publically announced days in advance.

So, when the auctioneer approached the top step outside of the courthouse, members of the ACORN, the owners and their friends, simply will not let the auction to take place by protesting with high noise.

The noisy protest is aimed at stopping the auction of a home, and in this case, it was the house of Armando Ramos and Fernanda Cárdenas located on 63rd Avenue in Oakland, which they have owned for five years. About 30 protesters were able to prevent the Cárdenas home from being auctioned on March 12.

However, Cárdenas said they still fear that they could be evicted from their home some other time soon.

Cárdenas said when they first bought their house their interest rate was 6.5 percent but it was an adjustable rate that could go as high as 14 percent, so they got a second mortgage with a 9.9 percent rate.

However, he said their monthly payments jumped from $2,600 to $3,700 and they can’t afford to pay that amount. Their joint income is of about $5,000 per month.

Cárdenas said they have tried to negotiate with their lender but their lender hasn’t been responsive.

(KTVU.com contributed to this report)

­

spot_img

Chávez slams Colombia’s Defense Minister

by the El Reportero’s news services

President Hugo Chávez said on March 8 in his weekly Aló Presidente broadcast that Colombia’s hardline defense minister, Juan Miguel Santos, was “a threat to the region” and warned that he would respond “with tanks” to any Colombian military encroachment on Venezuelan soil.

Chávez’s comments, which play well at home, do not represent any real threat to bilateral relations with Colombia.

Indeed the president made a point of calling on his counterpart Alvaro Uribe to preserve relations between the two, which are dominated above all by trade.

However, the comments do come at an interesting moment: the first meeting of the new South American Defense Council, a Brazil -Venezuela initiative to formally boost regional defense co-operation for the first time in the history of the Southern Cone, takes place today and tomorrow in Santiago, Chile.

Farc and drugs scandal rattles Ecuador as elections loom

An investigation into a cocaine shipment seized in 2007 has revealed hitherto unreported contacts between a senior official from the government of President Rafael Correa and the ex number-two leader of the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias

de Colombia (FARC) almost up to the eve of the Colombian raid on his camp inside Ecuador in which he was killed. Its ramifications, which have already affected a regional human rights NGO, could prove damaging to Correa in the run-up to the 26 April general elections.

Where’s the crisis heading?

The insouciance about the world ­economic crisis in Latin America’s bigger economies has proved shortlived.

In Brazil and Mexico companies are slashing costs and downgrading forecasts.

Among the middle sized economies, only Peru seems to believe that it will escape the crisis unscathed. Venezuela and Colombia have expressed worries about the crisis but barely touched the policy tiller. Chile, typically, has taken action. It has decided to raid its sovereign wealth fund to pay for a welter of new infrastructure projects.

Ecuador has gone back and opted for blunt protectionism.

spot_img

Another state may require residence ID for drivers

by Grazia Salvemini

Maryland, one of only four remaining states that do not require proof of legal U.S, residency to obtain a driver’s license, may soon do so.

More than 60 members of that state’s House of Representatives sponsored House Bill 195, the “Proof of Lawful Presence Act 2009.” Hearings began Feb. 25.

The bill is cross-filed as Senate Bill 369. Hearings will begin March 18.

Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, has stated he will support the legislation.

O’Malley explained that thousands of undocumented persons, including many from North Carolina, travel to Maryland to obtain licenses, often entering fraudulent documents through the system.

Immigrant advocates claim that denying licenses to undocumented workers for whom such transportation is deemed essential is likely to cause thousands to drive without a license or insurance. Licensing also ensures that all drivers have passed state motor vehicle exams demonstrating that they know the rules of the road, beneficial to the safety of everyone, the advocates say.

Other states that do not check the immigration status of applicants are Hawaii, New Mexico and Washington.

Arizona rancher guilty again of abusing migrants

by Jonathan Higuera

TUCSON, Ariz.—A federal jury in Tucson ~as found that border vigilante Roger Barnett guilty of assault and intentionally inflicting motional distress on four people who were part of a group of migrants who had crossed into Arizona from Mexico without authorization. Barnett was ordered to pay a total of $77,600 to four of the six plaintiffs who testified in the two-week trial which ended Feb. 17.

The verdict stemmed from a March 7, 2004, incident on public land near Barnett’s ranch in southern Arizona. A group of 16 migrants were resting in a wash when Barnett found them and held them at gunpoint for about half an hour. During the incident, plaintiffs testified that Barnett kicked one of the women who was lying on the ground twice and ordered, “Levantarse, perros.”

While no criminal charges were ever filed in the case, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund fled a civil action against Barnett, his wife Barbara and his brother Donald, who were also present at some point during the incident. The judge dropped the charges against the latter two.

The jury dismissed three other charges against Barnett: violating the plaintiffs’ civil rights, false imprisonment and battery.

“We’re satisfied with the verdict,” Katie O’Connor, a staff member with Border Action Network, a human rights organization in southern Arizona, who sat through the trial, told Weekly Report.

“Jurors obviously connected with the plaintiffs, who had guns pointed at them and were in fear for their life. But they still couldn’t go the extra distance in recognizing that everyone in this country is entitled to certain rights, whether here legally or illegally.”

Border Action Network helped MALDEF locate the plaintiffs, which took months of work.

The verdict is the second successful civil case against Barnett. In 2006, a federal jury ordered him to pay nearly $100,000 to a Mexican-American family he detained while they were hunting on public land. The verdict was upheld last September by the ­Arizona Supreme Court.

In that 2004 incident, MALDEF reported Barnett pointed an assault rifle at the plaintiffs, including three girls ages 9 to 11. Witnesses testified that he held the family and a friend, all legal U.S. residents, at gunpoint, cursed them with racial slurs and threatened to kill them.

In an interview with Hispanic Link in 2000, Barnett claimed to have captured hundreds of undocumented migrants who, he described as “crossing the border like cockroaches in the night.”

Following the latest verdict, O’Connor said, “We hope the two large checks he has to write will persuade him not to engage in this activity in the future.” Hispanic Link.

spot_img

Gus García wasn’t just another tall Texas tale

by Andy Porras

Even by Texas standards, larger-than-life characters the likes of lawyer Gus Garcia exceeded all such expectations.

I first learned of his heroic courtroom brilliance through my father José’s vivid recollections.

My father was my first and best history teacher. He would detail García’s various exploits to me, ending each with this approximate phrase to affirm his respect and awe: “Few men live a life of greatness and leave positive imprints on the lives of others, on society, and, in some unique instances, the world.”

Many of my father’s lessons revolved around Mexican-American experiences that are still slighted in state textbooks. In his day, discrimination against Latinos was a given, overt and rampant throughout the state. Latinos were barred by custom from many schoolrooms and courtroom juries, and by vicious signs posted in Texas eateries, stores, public swimming pools, beaches and restrooms. In one case, a funeral home in Three Rivers refused to bury a Latino soldier, Félix Longoria, killed in World War II “because the whites would not like it.”

García resurfaced in my life last month through a patchwork of old news accounts, historic photographs and film clips in the television documentary “A Class Apart,” about a landmark but little remembered civil rights case that was dusted off on PBS’s American Experience.

He was the lead attorney in the case.

“We were not considered intelligent,” explained the narrator.

García’s life story shredded that lie over and over again. After graduating from high school in San Antonio, he attended the University of Texas on an academic scholarship, earning a B.A. degree in 1936 and an LL.B. in 1938, passing the state bar the following year.

“Gus was a member of the university debate team,” my father told me one day. “The Texans met Harvard in competition and Gus outdebated another great American, John F. Kennedy!”

Drafted during World War II, García became a first lieutenant in the Army. He went to Japan assigned to the Judge Advocate’s office.

When the United Nations was founded in 1945 in San Francisco he was part of a U.S. legal team.

Then he returned to San Antonio, where he set up his legal practice, diving into several civil rights projects.

After the more celebrated 1946 Méndez v. Westminster Independent School District case ended segregation of Mexican-descent children in California, García filed a similar suit, Delgado v. Bastrop ISD, in Texas, along with Robert Eckhardt and A.L. Wirin of the American Civil Liberties Union. The Garcia team won.

In the case explored in “A Class Apart,” Hernández v. State of Texas, García and fellow attorney Carlos Cadena challenged the conviction of a Mexican-American defendant by an all-white jury that intentionally ­excluded Hispanics, not an uncommon practice at the time. They argued that the defendant was denied a fair trial.

It was the nation’s first Latino civil rights case to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

So invisible were Latinos then that the Justices asked Garcia if the people he represented “spoke English at all” and if they were U.S. citizens.

“Garcia wrote a crucial chapter in our Latino history,” my father told me then. “Here he was confronting the 12 most powerful judges in the land at a time when our country didn’t even respect the remains of dead American soldiers because of their skin color!”

So impressed were Chief Justice Earl Warren and his fellow judges that they allowed García an extra 16 minutes to voice his argument. Never before had the Court granted such permission.

“Not even the great Thurgood Marshall, when he went before the Court to argue the historic Brown v. Board of Education case had been granted extra time,” my father told me.

Sadly, as the PBS documentary concludes, the bottled demons García had battled for much of his life led to his untimely death at age 49, alone and broke on a park bench near San Antonio’s famed “Mercado.” Hispanic Link.

(Texas native Andy Porras is publisher of Califas, a bilingual monthly journal in Northern California. Email him at andyporras@yahoo.com). ©2009

spot_img

Boxing

Sunday, March 15 — at Quezon City, Philippines

  • WBO super flyweight title: Fernando Montiel vs. Nonito Donaire.
  • IBF light flyweight title: Ulises Solis vs. Brian Viloria.

Saturday, March 21 — at Stuttgart, Germany (ESPN)

  • WBC heavyweight title: Vitali Klitschko vs. Juan Carlos Gomez.

Saturday, March 21 — at Pensacola, FL

  • Roy Jones Jr. vs. Omar Sheika.

Friday, March 27 — at Los Angeles, CA (ESPN2)

  • Samuel Peter vs. Eddie Chambers.

Saturday, March 28 — at Cancun, Mexico

  • Interim WBO bantamweight title: Fernando Montiel vs. Eric Morel.
  • WBC super featherweight title: Humberto Soto vs. Antonio Davis.
  • Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. vs. Luciano Leonel Cuello.

Saturday, March 28 — at Miami, OK (Showtime)

  • Andre Dirrell vs. David Banks.
  • Ronald Hearns vs. Harry Yorgey.

Friday, April 3 — at Primm, NV (Showtime)

  • Yuriorkis Gamboa vs. TBA.
  • Breidis Prescott vs. TBA.

­Saturday, April 4 — at TBA, USA (Showtime)

  • WBC/WBO light welterweight title: Timothy Bradley vs. Kendall Holt.
spot_img

Spicy Latin Mambo Grooves

by the El Reportero’s staff

Featuring conga player Rafael, Zack Ferris in Piano, David Pinto in the base Bass. At 504 Broadway in SF, 94133. Special Guest Steve Turner Jr. Sax, Ron Mesina Bongo, Miguel Drum Set.

On Thursdays of March 5, 12 and 19, from 6 – 10 p.m. No Cover ! www.myspace.com/rouxtrio or www.myspace.com/rouxtrio. Reservations Encouraged 415-982-6223.

Dispatches from the war room

The man who has served as polling mastermind to Bill Clinton, Al Gore, South African President Nelson Mandela, Britain’s Tony Blair, Israel’s Ehud Barak and many other world leaders, will share his insider’s perspective on their campaign war rooms.

Stanley B. Greenberg, will describe how Bill Clinton accepted bold deficit reduction to promote long-term growth, losing the middle class voters he taxed and elaborate on how Nelson Madela embraced an inclusive “better life for all” theme, rather than a black power theme, demanding that the country unite and move forward.

Greenberg will also recount how Ehud Barak as Israeli Prime Minister stepped on the third rail of Israeli politics by offering the division of Jerusalem, and offer his take on how Tony Blair’s political convictions and religious faith propelled him to support George W. Bush in the invasion of Iraq.

At the Commonwealth Club, 595 Market St., 2nd floor, San Francisco. March 16, 5:30 p.m. Wine reception; 6 p.m. Program, 7 p.m. Book signing. Free for members, $15 for Non-members. To buy tickets call 415/597-6700 or register at www.commonwealthclub.org.

Talking about eratives

In these turbulent economic times coupled with the continuing rise of unemployment, cooperatives are an attractive model for businesses and homeownership. Get to know more about cooperatives and how they allow workers to become owners of their own businesses and how renters can become owners of their own homes.

The Mission Asset Fund (www.missionassetfund.org) invites you to discussion in Spanish about cooperatives. Coop representatives will talk about their experiences in a cooperative as well as how one can create a cooperative or get involved in one.

Representatives from the following cooperatives­ and businesses will participate: Mission SF Federal Credit Union, Rainbow Grocery, San Francisco Community Land Trust, TechCollective, Design Action Collective, y TeamWorks.

The discussion will take place Saturday, March 14th at the Centro del Pueblo (474 Valencia, near the cor- ner of 16th Street), starting at 11:00 am.

Call 415-839-6637 or go to www.fondopopul.ar.org/  cooperativas to reserve a seat. If needed, we will be offering childcare.

Luna Negra 2009: A night of women’s live art

Women artists from the Bay Area, Latin America, the Caribbean and beyond come together for one night of multidisciplinary performance art; one night where artists of traditional and contemporary artistic expressions unite, driven by their passion to share their unique voices and gifts with the world.

Women who are multidimensional, of diverse backgrounds, offer their creative perspectives on what it looks like to be an artist today – not solely the traditional “moon goddess” image with altars and candles, but gritty, non-conforming artists who bring their vision to the stage.

On March 25, 2009, from 7-9 p.m. General Admission: $8, students and seniors: $6. At the Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts Theater 2868 Mission Street, San Francisco. For more info call 415-821-1155.

spot_img