Wednesday, July 29, 2026
Home Blog Page 429

Colombia: Moving towards a change in the politics against drug trafficking?

Colombia is a cocaine producing country. Seventy percent of the cocaine produced is exported to the United States. We are concerned about the cocaine production and the role the Colombian guerrillas and the paramilitary have in the business, and what strategies the government is employing to face it. In this interview with Daniel Mejía Londoño, the director of the Center of Studies on Security and Drugs at the University of the Andes of Bogota.
Professor Mejía Londoño, what strategy is the government of Juan Manuel Santos employing to fight drug trafficking?

The position of the government is generally prohibitionist, although recently it has been open to an international debate on the possibility that the state should fulfill a regulatory r ole, more than to continue efforts to shut down production. In spite of the fact that it is the country that might and should lead the debate in Latin America concerning the politics of drugs, it has not taken this role so far, hoping to follow the exam sple of of Guatemala, which is a small country that has no influence at the regional level.

Why are peasants deciding to produce cocaine instead of food?

It is more profitable to produce cocaine than to produce food. Also, the peasants do not have to process it or take it to the market to sell it. The buyers come as close as the edge of their farms to collect the crops, so it is much easier. In some cases pressure is directly applied by the armed illegal groups giving the peasants the difficult choice of either cultivating cocaine or leaving the area.

What role does the paramilitary and the guerrillas have in drug trafficking?

Up to the mid 1990’s, the Farc (Armed Force Revolutionists of Colombia) was linked to the drug trafficking through receiving a tax that is called “gramaje”. That is to say, the guerrillas were receiving from the drug trafficker a payment for every kilo of cocaine produced in the territory under his control. With the fall of the communism, the guerrilla organizations lost international financing and, making use of the gap of power created by the dismantling of the cartels of Medellin and of Cali, entered the Business by controlling zones of farms and laboratories. The Farc and, more recently, the Eln (Army of National Liberation) are involved only in the first stages of the production, that is to say the farming of the coca leaf and its transformation in paste, in some zones they go so far as to producing cocaine, and have established strategic alliances with drug traffickers to smuggle it out of the country. On the other hand, the paramilitary and the Bacrim (Criminal Bands) are linked directly to the drug trafficking, and they themselves take the cocaine out of the country.

One of the methods used to try to stop the farming of cocaine is the spraying of the crops with glifosato (a herbicide). What consequences does it have?

The spraying of this chemical has been very harmful in terms of health and the environment, in addition to being ineffective in terms of reduction of these types of crops. In a review of a database of all the medical visits of Colombians to the health system between 2003 and 2008, there are 54 million incidents. We have compared this with the database of the sprayings, performing an economectric analysis. We believe that in the spray zones there is a much higher incidence of dermatologic problems and a major increase in miscarriages. There are other studies that have revealed negative effects on the environment and a degradation of the confidence that the people living in the municipalities of the fumigations have in the institutions of the state.

These problems do not appear in the cases in which the illicit farmings are eradicated manually. What do you think about this alternative?

Manual eradication has a high cost. Many people doing the manual eradication have died from land mines protecting the farming áreas, which were planted by the Farc or the paramilitary. Even if this was an efficient strategy, I do not think it is worth the sacrifices of so many Colombian lives just so that less cocaine is sent to the USA and to Europe. It is not just our problem, but they are transferring the whole cost to the producing countries – every country has to pay their share of the costs.

What is your proposal to fight to the drug trafficking?

To focus on the demand within the politics of prevention and treatment, it is necessary to treat the problem of the drugs as a problem of public health. The current prohibitionist method is not working. One of the points in the agenda of the dialogues of peace that are ongoing between the Colombian government and the Farc is the problem of drug trafficking.

Do you believe that the decision that will go on the negotiation table will be the ability to change the politics of Santos’s government into the topic of the struggle against drug trafficking?

Yes, it can be that the peace agreements lead to a change in the politics of struggle agains drug trafficking, but this should not be the reason.

Are we going to change it just because the Farc asks for it, after they spent 50 years murdering people, and not because there are more than 15 years of investigations that they say that it is a failure?

by Orsetta Bellani

spot_img

Colombia: Nationwide Agrarian Submit considers new farmers’ strike

Some 4,000 people from all corners of Colombia participated in the National Agrarian Summit, Peasant, Ethnic and from the People that took place in 15-17 March 2014 in the capital Bogotá. The event consisted of two days of panels and discussions on the issues that most affect the Colombian population, especially those living in the countryside, and concluded on March 17 with a march of about 30 thousand people who went through to the central Bogotá Plaza Bolívar.

César Jerez, national coordinator of Anzorc (Rural Reserve Areas National Association) told El Reportero that, “The National Land Summit represents a process that comes after the August 2013 agricultural strikes. We met with the idea of bringing together peasants, indigenous sectors, people of African descent and people of Colombia, to build a single list of demands, we propose a single negotiating table with the government for the entire country, to support the peace process between the government and the Farc (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) and finally set, if the government does not fulfill the agreements they make on the negotiating table, a route of peasant mobilization for the whole country.”

In August 2013, farmers from the better part of the country – backed by students, truck drivers, health workers and led by organizations such as Bureau of Dialogue and Agreement (MIA), the Congress of the People’s Patriotic March, the Coordinator Nacional Agraria (CNA) and the Process of Black Communities – paralyzed the country for three weeks, criticizing the high cost of inputs, the problems of access to land and infrastructural constraints that make it difficult to market their products. During the protests, farmers put a lot of emphasis on the necessity of repealing the resolution 970 of ICA (Colombian Agricultural Institute), which stipulates an obligation to plant certified inbred and transgenic seeds produced by transnational corporations. They also highlighted the problems associated with competition derived from free trade agreements (FTAs).

“The Colombian peasants suffer a structural neglect, exacerbated by the imposition of free trade agreements (FTAs). Actually, it´s not even about free trade agreements, since the signatory governments, such as the U.S., subsidize their agriculture while the Colombia does not. Therefore, the agricultural products imported from the United States can be sold at a cheaper price than Colombian products, a fact that is a disadvantage for local farmers, to the point that some agricultural sectors have gone bankrupt”, explains ASCAMCAT (Association Campesina del Catatumbo)’s Leonardo Rojas Diaz.

In fact, in May 2013 – one year after the entry into force of the FTA with the United States – according to the magazine Portfolio, Colombian imports grew by 50 per cent, mainly in food items. By analyzing the data on coffee exports, the country’s top product, the quality and pride of the Colombian population, we found that in the same period it went down by 31 per cent, while its imports reached 59.1 per cent.

The 2013 peasant mobilizations were harshly repressed and clashes between peasants and the Mobile squadron Riot (riot police) killed 19 people, while 600 were injured. “After the strike they installed negotiating tables with the government of Juan Manuel Santos,” Elisabeth Pavon, a spokeswoman for the farmers in the Catatumbo region in the MIA (Table of Dialogue and Agreement), tells El Reportero. “There is a national negotiating table that gathers delegates from each department and there are tables of local negotiations, one for each department. The results have been very partial, perhaps our table was the one that advanced the most.”

Apart from evidencing the difficulties in the negotiations and the Santos government’s non compliance, Colombian farmers criticize its proposed accession to the Agrarian Covenant, an agreement with Colombian agriculture unions that resulted of a consultation process that began on September 12, 2013. According to grassroots organizations, unions represent agribusiness and the oligarchy, whose interests are opposed to those of peasants, and roundly rejected the government´s proposal.

During the National Agricultural Summit, peasant, indigenous and Afro-descendant organizations from across the country announced that if the government remains deaf to their requests during the first week of May, the date of a new agrarian strike will be set. This is a very dangerous situation for Juan Manuel Santos, considering that he will seek re-election in the May 25 presidential elections.

 

by Orsetta Bellani

spot_img

Next Salvadorian government for more jobs and productivity

by the El Reportero’s wire services

Salvador Sánchez CerénSalvador Sánchez Cerén

The next government of the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN) will seek to generate more jobs, so it is urgent to strengthen the country’’s development, said today President-elect Salvador Sanchez Ceren.

In an interview with a local TV channel, Sánchez Ceren explained that to achieve this goal it is necessary to respect the rights of workers and improve their wages, stimulate the industrial sector through the creation of an institutional framework and stimulate investment.

In this regard, he recalled that the present government of Mauricio Funes and the FMLN were able to increase revenues to the extent that they were improving employment conditions.

For the new mandate, there are opportunities for the economic boom of the country because they inherit more than US$ 800 million for the administration of Funes, he said.

Many international companies are interested in investing in the country, much in energy and, in this context, Sanchez Ceren said they will seek mechanisms for El Salvador to be part of Petrocaribe. He also denied that ALBA-Petróleos El Salvador exerts some kind of influence on the nation as one of the questions suggested. We know that understanding will be difficult on some issues, but we must put before the interests of the country, for that reason he insisted on dialogue  and national agreements.

Unasur arrives in Caracas to the perfect narrative

The Venezuelan military high command emitted an unusually long (780-word) communiqué in response to the arrest of three generals accused by President Nicolás Maduro of plotting a coup d’état, in which it congratulated itself on its “coherent” conduct in the face of “the situation denominated a soft coup” taking place in Venezuela since 12 February. If that were not politicised enough, the statement went on to declare that the “monolithic” Bolivarian national armed forces (FANB) is no longer the “elitist and removed from-the-everyday” institution of yore, and that thanks to its “supreme and eternal commander”, Hugo Chávez (1999-2013), its fundamental priority now is to achieve “the wellbeing of all Venezuelans”, and to be “at the forefront of the country’s development”.

Russia interested in Nicaragua’s inter-oceanic canal

A delegation from the Russian State Duma in Nicaragua has expressed Russia’’s interest in participating in the construction of an intercondiciones oceanic canal in Nicaragua.

Laureano Ortega, a delegate from the Investment Promotion Agency of the Government of Nicaragua, said on television that he had held meetings with the parliamentarians and that they were well informed and very interested in the project.

Logically, consultations about how Russian companies might participate in the project have taken place, Ortega said, adding that Nicaragua’s image overseas is quite positive.

Earlier this year, the Sandinista government and the HKND Group, the canal’s concessionaire company, informed that the works for this mega project will start in the last quarter of 2014.

Along with the inter-oceanic waterway, two deep-water ports, a pipeline, new airports and a railroad will also be built.

Russian parliamentarians also held meetings with Foreign Minister Samuel Santos and representatives from the Ministry of Industry, Development and Trade, in which they expressed their interest in strengthening cooperative ties with Nicaragua.

The Russian State Duma delegation arrived in Nicaragua on Tuesday for a two-day visit.

(Prensa Latina and Latin News contributed to this news report).

spot_img

Woman and teenage unducumented immigrants pay thousands to cross U.S.-México border

Often get raped and sexually assaulted by guides

by Carlos Garcia
Latin Post

There is a booming business taking place on the U.S.-Mexico border: Human trafficking. Migrants who want to cross into the U.S. pay thousands of dollars to guides who use their knowledge of the land to bring them safely across while avoiding the border patrol.

“Coyote” is the name given in the trade for the human smugglers who are responsible for the majority of the undocumented immigration across the Southwest border.

One of these coyotes is a 29-year-old woman named “Paula”, who lives in the border city of Piedras Negras, across from Eagle Pass, Texas. She says she’s been a coyote since she was 17 years old. In the 12 years of doing this line of work, she says she has only been caught by the Border Patrol four times. Each time, her clients tell the federal agent that she is just another undocumented immigrant and she gets released instead of being prosecuted as a human smuggler.

Paula and other coyotes make a very good living compared to the other economic opportunities available to them. In her case, clients will pay $1,500 to San Antonio or $1,800 to Houston, $300-400 of which goes to Paula for each client she smuggles. She usually makes a couple of trips a month.

“I feel like I’m helping them. Things are rough here,” she says. “They can earn a lot better living there, and then send money back to their families in Mexico.”

U.S. Customs and Border Protection is using more agents, better technology, and tougher prosecutions to try and stop the constant wave of immigrants trying to enter the country illegally, but Paula the coyote says it won’t stop the trade: “We move them across the way we’ve always crossed them. This work never ends; there’s always demand.”

Paula’s group walks through the night, and after doing this for a dozen years she knows where the trails are, which fences to jump, and the locations of the tanks where they can refill their water bottles, as well as the cell phone towers to use as directional guides.

After the nine-hour hike to get past the Border Patrol checkpoint on Highway 57, Paula will call someone on her cell phone and he sends vehicles to pick them up and take them to San Antonio or Houston. The next day, Paula takes a bus back to her home on the Mexican side of the border and waits for her next trip.

Increasingly, however, there is an epidemic of rape going on at these border crossings where women are sexually assaulted by the men they pay to bring them across. “When they get tired and say they don’t want to walk anymore, there are the bad coyotes who say, ‘I’m not going to argue with you. You stay here.

We’re leaving.’ They don’t want to stop the trip because of one or two people. I won’t leave my clients. If they’re tired, I wait, let them rest a little, let the pain go away. Then we keep walking,” Paula revealed.

Pharmacist Maria Jaime Peña, in the smuggling town of Altar in northern Mexico, says women coming in her store, which is the last stop for many migrants before making the trek across the Sonoran desert into Arizona, often ask the same question: ‘What can I do in case I’m raped, and I don’t want to get pregnant?”

Females understand they are completely at the will of the people who are transporting so they prepare themselves with contraceptives before the journey.

Similarly, guides and coyotes advise their female clients to go on birth control because they know what goes on once the group goes into the desert.

One woman, a 43-year-old who recently tried crossing with her teenage daughter, started walking with the group but couldn’t keep up. One of the coyotes said he’d wait for her if he could have sex with her daughter. They refused so he abandoned them. She says they only survived because they were able to find the border patrol.

When a woman is raped in remote stretches of the border region between the U.S. and Mexico, it almost always goes unpunished. Women who are raped while crossing the border often won’t report the crime to anyone out of fear of retaliation from the crime networks who are responsible for the human trafficking trade. Victimized women are also afraid that they will get deported if they 5report the crime in the United States, something which is sad but true. Also, the coyotes might know where their families are back in Mexico, and they are afraid that their children or families would get killed.

Even if they do report the rape, there is a high likelihood that the culprit would still not be caught due to lack of evidence. A rape kit has to be administered by the hospital within 72 hours of the rape but if a woman is raped in the desert, by the time she gets to the hospital, it may already be too late to prove that she was raped, therefore making it impossible to identify who sexually assaulted her.

Some of the raped women will end up pregnant and try to get abortions after they have crossed over into the United States. The coyotes used to be someone that the family knew and trusted, but the industry has changed and now it is very dangerous, especially for women to cross. One woman from Nogales was brought across the border by a man under false pretenses then taken to the city of Atlanta and pimped as a prostitute for years.

Tony Estrada, a sheriff in Arizona’s Santa Cruz County, says rapes have likely increased since heightened border security has pushed migrants into remote areas of the desert and organized crime has taken over the smuggling routes. Contrary to popular belief, the US-Mexico border crossing is used by migrants from all over Central America, and even other regions. The overall number of migrants trying to cross illegally into the U.S. has dropped in the past few years, but the trip and border towns have gotten a lot more dangerous now that some of Mexico’s most brutal drug cartels are earning millions of dollars each year from the extortion and smuggling of migrants. Last year, hundreds of migrants went missing or were killed in Mexico, and more than 20,000 were kidnapped.

The drug cartels have turned the extortion of migrants into a highly sophisticated and lucrative criminal enterprise. Migrants are abducted and held for ransom until family members pay hundreds, or even thousands, of dollars. The old mom-and-pop operations have been pushed out by organized crime.

Last year alone, almost 400,000 undocumented immigrants were deported, many of whom are teenagers desperate to get across into the United States. Many of those who are sent back will try again and again until they succeed because they have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Author Luis Alberto Urrea, who has written about the crime and brutality of the U.S.-Mexico border crossing, says that it’s not against Mexican law to leave Mexico at any time without papers. “You know, I was talking to one of the custodians at my university just this week, and she said: You know what’s so funny? I got here, and I had no idea I was illegal until somebody told me,” he says.

“When you think about it, a lot of the folks coming are very rural people from the deep south, you know, many of them illiterate, many people who — they don’t have access to the news. They’re just trying to get here. And they’re used to getting the better of their authorities because their authorities are out to get them.”

spot_img

Simple ways to avoid GMO foods

[Author]by J. D. Heyes
[/Author]
Thanks to the efforts of Natural News and some other news sources, an increasing number of Americans are becoming more aware of just how damaging to the world’s food system genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have become. The rise in food allergies and gluten sensitivities are evidence that GM foods have impacted the global food chain in negative and dangerous ways.

As such, millions of Americans agree that, at the very minimum, GM foods ought to carry labeling designating them as such — just like the labeling requirements for ingredients in other foods.

Some states are beginning to get the message and are responding to demands by their citizens to require such labeling. As reported by Prevention magazine, Connecticut and Maine are two states that are moving in that direction; also, our editor-in-chief, Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, has reported extensively on recent efforts in California to require GMO labeling [http://www.naturalnews.com].

Why it is important to require GMO labeling

So far, the federal government has resisted requiring GM foods to be labeled, no doubt in part due to intense lobbying by the food industry (as happened in the defeat of a California labeling initiative), which does not want to label GM foods, for some reason. But such resistance to labeling means that Americans who want to avoid GM foods are basically on their own to figure out what to avoid.

As repored by Prevention: To the rescue: the Environmental Working Group (EWG), a pro-GMO-labeling environmental nonprofit, has just released a Shopper’s Guide to Avoiding GE Foods to make it a little easier for people to avoid GMOs (GMO and genetically engineered, or GE, are used interchangeably to describe these crops). The reason why it is so important to require GMO labeling is because of their potential to cause ill effects in those who consume them.

Besides the fact that such crops have never been adequately tested for safety, the EWG says that GM foods are increasing the amount of herbicide-resistant weeds that no longer die when they are sprayed with Monsanto’s Roundup, which the seeds were bred to resist.

As such, farmers are increasingly being forced to use more and more potent and toxic herbicides in order to compensate. Also, the widespread adoption of GM crops by American farmers has endangered organic farming due to unintended contamination of organic crops (mostly through agricultural run-off and crosspollination, when pollen blows from a GMO farm to an organic one).

EWG “cites one estimate from the Union of Concern Scientists that the potential lost income for farmers growing organic corn may total $90 million annually, all because their crops get unknowingly contaminated by nearby GMO farmers,” Prevention reported. So, without labeling, how do you avoid GM foods?

Here are some ways you can reduce your exposure:

–Stick with the organic stuff.

Under the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Organic Program, farmers are prohibited from planting seeds that have been genetically engineered. Also, organic food producers are prohibited from using ingredients that come from GM crops — soy, corn and canola, for example. “Organic regulations also prohibit organic dairy and livestock operations from using GMO grains (again, corn and soy) to feed their animals,” Prevention reported. One thing to remember: Not all organic foods are good for everyone. As Natural News’ Derek Henry reported in January, five organic foods that may damage your digestive system include wheat, soy, peanut butter, cow’s milk and pork [http://www.naturalnews.com].

–Make sure you buy “Non-GMO Project Verified.

The Non-GMO Project begins where organic certification ends. The project certifies products that have less than 0.9 percent GMO contamination.

–Check labels and dodge the “Factory Four.

Corn, soy and sugar (the latter from GM sugar beets) and vegetable oils that are made from GM crops are the four most common GM ingredients you’ll encounter in your food. Another thing to remember: About 90 percent of all corn grown in the U.S. is genetically engineered. (by Natural News).

spot_img

The intelligence bureaucracy that ate our world – Part 2

by Marvin Ramirez

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin Ramirez

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: Many of you, dear readers of El Reportero, might not have any idea of what the government is really doing with all the data accumulated in their databases – our information. How much information it has about all of us and what this means for the preservation of civil liberties in this world of super high technology, where almost everything – from the TV set on which you watch your favorite soap opera to every phone call you make on your cell phone – is being recorded. And our Congress – if we can call it our Congress – is an accomplice on this rape of our liberties. The following article, that was found hidden somewhere in the internet, brings a lot of fine information for you and me to know a little bit more how we are becoming their slaves in a more and more sinister way. Most of us live our lives just coming and going to our jobs or watching our favorite ball games – like zombies, looking dumbly at our iphones, doing nothing about it. Due that this article is too long for our space availability, we have split it into two parts. This is Part One.

by Tom Engelhardt

A system that creates its own reality

To leave the country, of course, I had to briefly surrender my shoes, hat, belt, computer – you know the routine – and even then, stripped to the basics, I had to pass through a scanner of a sort that not so long ago caused protest and upset but now is evidently as American as apple pie. Then I spent those nine days touring some of Spain’s architectural wonders, including the Alhambra in Granada, the Mezquita or Great Mosque of Cordoba, and that city’s ancient synagogue (the only one to survive the expulsion of the Jews in 1492), as well as Antonio Gauda’s Sagrada Familia, his vast Barcelona basilica, without once – in a country with its own grim history of terror attacks – being wanted or patted down or questioned or even passing through a metal detector. Afterwards, I took a flight back to a country whose national security architecture had again expanded subtly in the name of “my” safety.

Now, I don’t want to overdo it. In truth, those new guidelines were no big deal. The information on – as far as anyone knows – innocent Americans that the NCTC wanted to keep for those extra 4½ years was already being held ad infinitum by one or another of our 17 major intelligence agencies and organizations. So the latest announcement seems to represent little more than bureaucratic housecleaning, just a bit of extra scaffolding added to the Great Mosque or basilica of the new American intelligence labyrinth. It certainly was nothing to write home about, no less trap a fictional character in.

Admittedly, since 9/11 the U.S. Intelligence Community, as it likes to call itself, has expanded to staggering proportions. With those 17 outfits having a combined annual intelligence budget of more than $80 billion (a figure which doesn’t even include all intelligence expenditures), you could think of that community as having carried out a statistical coup d’etat. In fact, at a moment when America’s enemies – a few thousand scattered jihadis, the odd minority insurgency, and a couple of rickety regional powers (Iran, North Korea, and perhaps Venezuela) – couldn’t be less imposing, its growth has been little short of an institutional miracle. By now, it has a momentum all its own. You might even say that it creates its own reality.

Of classic American checks and balances, we, the taxpayers, now write the checks and they, the officials of the National Security Complex, are free to be as unbalanced as they want in their actions. Whatever you do, though, don’t mistake Clapper, Holder, and similar figures for the Gaudas of the new intelligence world. Don’t think of them as the architects of the structure they are building. What they preside over is visibly a competitive bureaucratic mess of overlapping principalities whose “mission” might be summed up in one word: more.

In a sense – though they would undoubtedly never think of themselves this way – I suspect they are bureaucratic versions of Kafka’s Joseph K., trapped in a labyrinthine structure they are happencontinually, blindly, adding to. And because their “mission” has no end point, their edifice has neither windows nor exits, and for all anyone knows is being erected on a foundation of quicksand. Keep calling it “intelligence” if you want, but the monstrosity they are building is neither intelligent nor architecturally elegant.

It is nonetheless a system elaborating itself with undeniable energy. Whatever the changing cast of characters, the structure only grows. It no longer seems to matter whether the figure who officially sits atop it is a former part-owner of a baseball team and former governor, a former constitutional law professor, or – looking to possible futures – a former corporate raider.

A basilica of chaos

Evidently, it’s our fate – increasing numbers of us anyway – to be transformed into intelligence data (just as we are being eternally transformed into commercial data), our identities sliced, diced, and passed around the labyrinth, our bytes stored up to be “mined” at their convenience.

You might wonder: What is this basilica of chaos that calls itself the U.S. Intelligence Community? Bamford describes whistleblower William Binney, a former senior NSA cryptomathematician “largely responsible for automating the agency’s worldwide eavesdropping network,” as holding “his thumb and forefinger close together” and saying, “We are that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.”

It’s an understandable description for someone who has emerged from the labyrinth, but I doubt it’s on target. Ours is unlikely to ever be a Soviet-style system, even if it exhibits a striking urge toward totality; towards, that is, engulfing everything, including every trace you’ve left anywhere in the world. It’s probably not a Soviet-style state in the making, even if traditional legal boundaries and prohibitions against spying upon and surveilling Americans are of remarkably little interest to it.

Its urge is to data mine and decode the planet in an eternal search for enemies who are imagined to lurk everywhere, ready to strike at any moment. Anyone might be a terrorist or, wittingly or not, in touch with one, even perfectly innocentseeming Americans whose data must be held until the moment when the true pattern of enemies comes into view and everything is revealed.

In the new world of the National Security Complex, no one can be trusted – except the officials working within it, who in their eternal bureaucratic vigilance clearly consider themselves above any law. The system that they are constructing (or that, perhaps, is constructing them) has no more to do with democracy or an American republic or the Constitution than it does with a Soviet-style state. Think of it as a phenomenon for which we have no name. Like the yottabyte, it’s something new under the sun, still awaiting its own strange and ugly moniker.

For now, it remains as anonymous as Joseph K. and so, conveniently enough, continues to expand right before our eyes, strangely unseen.

If you don’t believe me, leave the country for nine days and just see if, in that brief span of time, something else isn’t drawn within its orbit. After all, it’s inexorable, this rough beast slouching through Washington to be born. Welcome, in the meantime, to our nameless new world. One thing is guaranteed: it has a byte.

(Tom Engelhardt is the author of The American Way of War: How Bush’s Wars Became Obama’s. His latest book is The United States of Fear).

spot_img

“Obama’s military spending cuts equal military spending increases”

Submitted by the Libertarian Party

While the Libertarian Party strongly agrees with the need to downsize the U.S. military, the Obama plan recently announced by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel expands the military.

Both Democratic and Republican politicians routinely deceive taxpayers by portraying slight reductions in the growth of government as “cuts.”

When military spending cuts are involved, Republicans protest loudly, giving credence to the claim that the cuts are real.

Both Democrats and Republicans use these theatrics to disguise reckless government overspending — just as they did with the government “shutdown.”

“Elementary school arithmetic instructs us that if you grow spending at a slower rate — it still gets higher. It’s not a reduction; it’s an increase,” said Geoffrey J. Neale, chair of the Libertarian National Committee.
President Obama and Secretary Hagel propose creation of a new $26 billion “Opportunity, Growth, and Security Initiative” (read: slush fund) while keeping the 2015 Pentagon budget at the same level as 2014. That’s an increase of $26 billion.

They also propose wiping out what’s left of the so-called “sequester,” thereby sheltering the military from automatic spending cuts.

Democrats and Republicans already gutted a good portion of the sequester in the December round of budget negotiations.

Now they want to both increase military spending and take away the minimal spending controls that are still in effect — while pretending they want to cut military spending.

The sequester cuts were agreed to in exchange for higher spending and higher government debt passed under the deceptively-named Budget Control Act of 2011. One more illustration that politicians’ promises for spending cuts equal spending increases.

They propose reducing the total employment of the Army, National Guard, Reserves, and Marine Corps by a mere 3.9 percent — while touting it as “shrinking the Army to its smallest size in 74 years.” This tiny reduction in personnel — if it ever happens — is not backed by cuts in spending. No cost savings. No real reduction.

They call for slowing down the growth in pay raises and the growth of tax-free housing allowances for military personnel.

The only slight reduction they offer is an increase in contributions they pay for insurance deductibles and co-pays. Overall, they propose higher government spending for military personnel.

They propose a series of domestic base closures which, again, are not backed by spending cuts. Any savings will not go to taxpayers but to spending in other areas of the military.

In all likelihood, there will be little to no savings at all from base closures as proposed by President Obama. Few, if any, bases will actually close because congressmen and senators will lobby intensely to keep them open in their home states. No base closure initiatives in the last 25 years have resulted in savings greater than $1–3 billion per year, and some resulted in no closings at all.

Given that the U.S. government spends more than $1 trillion for military purposes every year, such savings are trivial and will be used as an argument not to close any bases, as they were during the last round of attempted military base closings in 2005.

It appears the administration is more interested in provoking lawmakers to ensure bases stay open than in closing them and cutting costs — while pretending to downsize the U.S. military.

The Libertarian Party and its candidates aim to substantially downsize the U.S. military.

Libertarians are lining up to run for federal office in 2014 on a platform to cut military spending immediately by at least 60 percent, close a substantial number of overseas military bases, and bring troops home.

Specific Libertarian proposals to downsize the U.S. military include:

• Immediately withdraw all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and bring them home to their families.

• Stay out of Syria, Ukraine, and every other foreign conflict.

• Close unneeded U.S. military bases and outposts in more than 130 countries around the world, and bring our troops home. First on the list are the massive deployments in Germany, Italy, South Korea, and Japan — countries that can fund their own military defense.

• Close at least half of the nation’s 4,402 domestic Department of Defense sites.

• Use 100 percent of operating cost savings to reduce the federal income tax, balance the federal budget, or both.

• Sell off all foreign and domestic real estate holdings of closed military bases and DoD sites while requiring that all proceeds be used to pay down existing government debt. None of it should pay for more government spending.

“Reducing and eliminating military bases in foreign countries will remove a major source of hostility towards the United States, reduce the threat of a terrorist attack, and reduce federal government debt by $300 billion,” Neale said.

“Cutting military spending by $600 billion every year will go a long way toward balancing the federal budget and ending the federal income tax,” he said. “This will give back $5,000 every year to each taxpaying family in the United States; stimulate investment in small businesses; and create millions of sustainable, private-sector jobs. Plenty of jobs for veterans and millions of others now out of work.”

Libertarian Party platform on National Defense:

“We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.”

Sources:

“Hagel Says US Military Must Shrink to Face New Era,” Associated Press, Feb. 24, 2014.
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/hagel-propose-big-cuts-army-2015-budget.

“Military mystery: How many bases does the US have, anyway?” Occasional Planet, Jan. 24, 2011: http://www.occasionalplanet.org/2011/01/24/military-mystery-how-many-bases-does-the-us-have-anyway/.

“Base Structure Report: Fiscal Year 2007 Baseline,” Department of Defense
http://www.defense.gov/pubs/BSR_2007_Baseline.pdf.

“Op-Ed: How many bases does U.S. have globally and what is their cost?” Digital Journal, Dec. 16, 2012: http://digitaljournal.com/article/339184.

spot_img

California farm workers to attend special preview of César Chávez biopic

by the El Reportero’s news services

César ChávezCésar Chávez

More than 1,000 farm workers who benefit from the legacy of César Chávez attended Tuesday, April 1 in California’s Central Valley a special preview of the film about the late civil rights activist and labor leader’s life.

The movie César Chávez will screen at what is now the National Historic Landmark of Forty Acres, outside Delano, where the United Farm Workers co-founder fasted for almost a month as part of his peaceful fight for field hands’ rights.

“We’re celebrating the legacy of César Chávez but we’re also acknowledging that we’re still active and working for a better life for farmworkers,” UFW Vice President Armando Elenes told Efe.

“In this case, field hands will be among the first to see the movie,” he said.

Director Diego Luna and América Ferrera, who plays César’s wife Helen Chávez, will be on hand Tuesday for the outdoor preview.

Also expected is Paul Chávez, son of the farmworkers’ leader and president of the César Chávez Foundation, along with UFW President Arturo Rodríguez.

“We keep working – the United Farm Workers and the rest of the movement – to improve farm Marrónhands’ working conditions.

According to NY Daily News’ Jordan Hoffman, beyond the speeches, however, this film lacks fire. The struggles of the exploited workers are too vague, as are the overall goals of Chávez’s union. Lacking specifics, we’re unenthused. That’s because we’ve seen this kind of film before.

America Ferrera is wasted as Chávez’s staunch wife, Helen, as is Rosario Dawson as Dolores Huerta, one of his top associates, adds Hoffman.

“The rising defiance and the rallies are indeed stirring, but the scenes of Chávez’s personal life are vague and flat. A subplot concerning his defiant eldest son feels shoehorned in. What should be a transformative drama about the drive toward social justice consuming an individual ultimately feels like a midbudget TV movie. Archival footage of then-Gov. Ronald Reagan and then-President Richard Nixon serves as a simplistic target for audience hissing,” Hoffman wrote in his review for the Daily News.

César Chávez (Michael Peña)César Chávez (Michael Peña)

“Some of Chávez’s strong character shines through, but this isn’t the movie he’s owed,” Hoffman concluded.

Celia Cruz joins Walk of Legends at Apollo Theater in NYC

Legendary salsa singer Celia Cruz has been honored with a place on the Walk of Legends at New York’s Apollo Theater.

The late Cuban-born singer was honored on Saturday, March 24, marking the 50th anniversary of her first appearance on the stage of the iconic New York Theater.

The concert was part of a series commemorating the 80th anniversary of the legendary Harlem Theater.

Cruz made her Apollo debut on March 22, 1964, sharing the stage with Cuban musician Machito and Joe Cuba, a Puerto Rican musician.

The “Queen of Salsa” is the first Latin artist to be honored with a place at the Apollo’s Walk of Legends.

Celia Cruz, who died of cancer on July 16, 2003, in her Fort Lee, New Jersey, home at the age of 77, is buried in a mausoleum at Woodlawn Cemetery in the Bronx.

Guadalajara kicks off 29th Film Festival

The 29th Guadalajara International Film Festival, or FICG, which has the Canadian province of Quebec as guest of honor, was inaugurated at the Telmex Auditorium in this western Mexican city.

Sara Garcia (1895-1980), the “grandma of Mexican movies,” was dedicated the Posthumous Tribute, and was accepted in her name by Enrique Vidal, a personal friend of the unforgettable actress.

Countries with the greatest participation in the festival were Mexico with 370 films, Spain with 306, Argentina with 153, Brazil with 139, Chile with 55, and the province of Quebec with more than 60.

spot_img

Saccho Dance Theater presents Dying While Black and Brown

Compiled by El Reportero’s staff

Marta LledoMarta Lledo

ZACCHO Dance Theatre and San Francisco’s Neighborhood Arts Collaborative presents two free performances of the 2011 work, Dying While Black and Brown.

A panel discussion will follow Friday’s performance with Ana Zamora, Senior Policy Advocate at ACLU and former Program Director at Death Penalty Focus, and James Bell, Founder and Executive Director of Burns Institute, a leading nonprofit in the field of juvenile justice and the reduction of ethnic and racial disparities.

First commissioned by the San Francisco Equal Justice Society, Dying While Black and Brown focuses on capital punishment and the disproportionate numbers of incarcerated people of color. The piece was created by ZACCHO’s Artistic Director, Joanna Haigood in collaboration with renowned jazz composer, Marcus Shelby.

“The piece Dying While Black & Brown impacted me in a very profound way, because it took me back to a place emotionally that allowed me to reconnect with the tragedy of the past 18 years of my life, and then it also reminded me of the triumph of winning back my freedom.” -Anthony Graves, Texas Defender, former death row inmate.

On Friday, April 4, at 8 p.m. & Saturday, April 5 at 2 p.m., at ZACCHO Studio, 1777 Yosemite Ave #330, San Francisco. For info call (415) 822-6744 or visit: www.zaccho.org. (Performance followed by panel discussion).

Marta Lledo Quartet Latin Moonlight in Oakland

Renowned Argentinean pianist, Marta Lledo (Argentine National Symphony), will be joined by Juan Escovedo (son of Pete Escovedo) on percussion, Paul Bonnel (has performed for the Dalai Lama) on bass, and Billy Johnson (former Santana drummer) on drums.

The musicians will present a fusion of Argentinean tango, Mexican boleros, Latin jazz, and classical pop. The program will consist of an array of popular classics, jazz standards, classical favorites, and tangos with a few creative twists. A wine reception will follow the show.

On Friday, April 4, at 8 p.m., at the intimate Piedmont Piano Company in Oakland, 1728 San Pablo Ave. (at 18th), Oakland, California.

Singer Rennea at the 27th Annual Sólo Mujeres

NikitaNikita

San Francisco-based Venezuelan singer, Rennea, will be singing an acoustic set as part of MAPP Mission Arts & Performance Project happening at The Mission Cultural Center in the Gallery space where “HOME, inside and out,” 27th Annual Solo Mujeres Show is happening.

This is a thoughtful, current and beautiful show worth giving it a close look. Curated by Susana Aragón e Indira Urrutia.

On Saturday April 4, 2014 6 to 6:45 p.m., at the Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts, 2868 Mission St., SF

Child singer, actress and model at Children Event

Nikita, the new promise of the children song in the Bay Area, will be participating with her voice and acting in the Children Event to celebrate 25 years of song writing written by Víctor Hugo Santos.

And although she interprets with ease other musical genres (in English and Spanish), Nikita, a singer, actress and children clothes model, has become the official interpreter of the songs of children troubadour Mr. Hugo Santos.

The event will be held on April 6 at 2 p.m. at the Plaza of the Mexican Heritage in San Jose, California.

spot_img

For children of reentry, a new focus on family ties

by Anna Challet
New America Media

SACRAMENTO – While millions of children nationwide face extreme difficulties due to having parents who are incarcerated or under criminal supervision, State Senator Mark Leno thinks change is coming.

“The good news is that after many decades of building [more] prisons to incarcerate [more] of our citizens, and lengthening every sentence, and making [more] misdemeanors felonies, and of course selling it all under the auspices of being tough on crime, that it appears we have turned a corner,” he says.

Leno (who represents the state’s 11th District in the Bay Area) convened a policy forum earlier this month at the State Capitol to look at the impact of the criminal justice system on the families of those who enter it, particularly “children of reentry” – children and youth whose incarcerated parents have returned home.

Sponsored by the California Homeless Youth Project of the California Research Bureau and the California Council on Youth Relations (a project of New America Media), the forum also explored what can be done to change the system in ways that will support current inmates, the formerly incarcerated, and their families.

Leno cited Attorney General Eric Holder’s work at the national level to end mandatory minimum sentencing for low-level drug offenders. Law enforcement leaders who have been tough on crime, he said, are now realizing that the funding going to excessive incarceration is not money well spent, especially without reentry services that prevent recidivism.

In California, it costs about $50,000 a year to incarcerate one inmate. And in addition to state spending, advocates made clear that children have had to pay a huge price.

Nell Bernstein of the San Francisco Children of Incarcerated Parents Partnership said, “If we collectively don’t take responsibility … in whether or not we prepare people for reentry and in what barriers we do or don’t place in front of them … it falls to the kids.”

She points to “post-prison punishments,” such as laws that prohibit people with drug convictions from accessing public housing.

Leno agrees. “We scratch our heads and wonder [why we have] a 65 percent recidivism rate when we’re setting people up for an obvious opportunity to fail,” he said.

Bernstein says that the key variable is whether or not those released have family support. “The single greatest predictor of successful reentry is an ongoing connection with one’s family during incarceration,” she said. “If we do start supporting family connections, we’ll see success on a system level and on a family level.”

Sixteen-year-old Kmani Baxter spoke about how his father is currently incarcerated in Lancaster, in Southern California. Baxter lives in the Bay Area and was only able to see his father once last year by taking the train.

Brittany Rexford, 27, is a formerly incarcerated parent. “[My family] put forth the effort to help me stay connected with my daughter, to help me keep that relationship with her,” she said. “She was very young and I remember watching her through the glass and trying to teach her numbers and letters.” But Rexford was later moved to a penitentiary that was too far from home for her family to visit.

Rexford says it should be a priority to keep inmates “close to home so that the option of seeing their children is there. Don’t take someone from Shasta County and move them to Los Angeles.”

Alisha Murdock of Project WHAT! (an advocacy organization that trains service providers in how to meet the needs of children of the incarcerated) stressed the need for pre-release planning, especially for parents. Murdock’s mother was released from jail a month early and at night, over 100 miles from where Murdock lives, without money or identification – which Murdock says “jeopardized [her mother’s] sobriety.”

While she says that her mother is doing well now, she wishes the system had better prepared her mother “to come back, not just into society, but into my life.”

San Francisco Chief of Adult Probation Wendy Still highlighted ways that the city’s probation department is working to “break the intergenerational cycle of crime.” Still noted that 60 percent of parents in state prisons in California report being held over 100 miles from their children, and that children’s odds of delinquency increase dramatically when visits with parents are denied. She also says that regular visits with children lower rates of recidivism for parents after they are released.

Still says that San Francisco is in the process of implementing more robust pre-release planning for inmates, including individual risk and needs assessments, as well as individualized treatment plans that include services like parenting classes, substance abuse treatment, GED classes, and housing counseling. San Francisco, she says, is also moving toward alternative sentencing for mothers with young children, in addition to contact visiting for inmates and their children in more family-friendly environments.

spot_img