Monday, September 9, 2024
Home Blog Page 361

California Homeowner Bill of Rights signed into law, activists demand moratoriu

­by El Reportero staff

The Homeowner Bill of Rights, designed to protect homeowners and borrowers during the mortgage and foreclosure process, was signed into law today by Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr, announced Attorney General Kamala D. Harris.

The Homeowner Bill of Rights prohibits a series of inherently unfair bank practices that have forced thousands of Californians into foreclosure. The law restricts dual-track foreclosures, where a lender forecloses on a borrower despite being in discussions over a loan modification to save the home. It also guarantees struggling homeowners a single point of contact at their lender with knowledge of their loan and direct access to decision makers, and imposes civil penalties on fraudulently signed mortgage documents. In addition, homeowners may require loan servicers to document their right to foreclose and borrowers can access courts to enforce their rights under this legislation.

According to Attorney General Harris, these laws “will give struggling homeowners a fighting shot to keep their home”, adding that they “will benefit homeowners, their community, and the housing market as a whole.”

“These new rules make the foreclosure process more transparent so that loan servicers cannot promise one thing while doing the exact opposite,” said Governor Brown.

Senator Ron Calderon (D-Montebello) and local leaders praised this signature. “Today is a historic day for California. We have put the seal of the State in the protection to working families against the unfair practices by some lenders during the mortgage crisis”, said Calderon in a statement.

However, anti-foreclosure activists warned Wednesday’s signing of the “Homeowner Bill of Rights” by Gov. Brown is not “acceptable” because the protections touted by the legislation won’t go into effect until 2013 – and hundreds of thousands of homes in the state are at risk of foreclosure before then. CJ Holmes, a real estate professional and founder of Home Owners For Justice, a non-profit organization designed to help homeowners demanded a foreclosure moratorium.

According to her, there are more than 70,000 homes and condos scheduled for foreclosure auction in the next 30 days and more than 400,000 owners of homes and condos are at risk of foreclosure loss between now and January 1st, 2013, when the legislation is set to go into effect. “The people of this State deserve protections now. We petition the Governor to stop foreclosures until the legislation to protect us becomes law”, stated CJ Holmes.

The Homeowner Bill of Rights consists of a series of related bills, including two identical bills that were passed on July 2 by the state Senate and Assembly: AB 278 (Eng, Feuer, Pérez, Mitchell) and SB 900 (Leno, Evans, Corbett, DeSaulnier, Pavley, Steinberg).

The Homeowner Bill of Rights builds upon and extends reforms first negotiated in the recent national mortgage settlement between 49 states and leading lenders. Attorney General Harris secured up to $18 billion for California homeowners in that agreement, and has also built a Mortgage Fraud Strike Force to investigate crime and fraud associated with mortgages and foreclosures.

Join the supporters of Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi and his family for his reinstatemen

Compiledby theEl Reportero’s staff

Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi - Eliana López: (PHOTO BY LUKE THOMAS/FOG CITY JOURNAL)Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi – Eliana López. (PHOTO BY LUKE THOMAS/FOG CITY JOURNAL)

Comité de Padres Unidos is inviting the general public to join efforts to reinstate Sheriff Mirkarimi to the post to which the people of San Francisco elected him.

The shameless perpetration of injustices against our chosen candidate to be the County’s Sheriff continues. The Sheriff has demonstrated he is interested in working with and for our communities as he did when he was City’s Supervisor for District 5 for two consecutive terms. (Please see the Sheriff’s brief biography attached).

We want justice for the Sheriff and his young family, and we need him to come back to work for the people of San Francisco.

We invite you to attend the meetings on July 18 and July 19, both at 5 p.m. to show our support for Sheriff Mirkarimi and to show our repudiation to the cruel and unjust political tactics of Mayor Ed Lee and his associates. At at the San Francisco Ethics Commission, City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, San Francisco.

Beautiful Trash: The Lost Library Works by Adrian Arias

Galeria de la Raza is proud to present Beautiful Trash: The Lost Library, a solo exhibition of mixed-media works by Adrian Arias. The exhibition will open on Saturday, July 14.

In this new summer exhibition, artist Adrian Arias imagines a post-apocalyptic and synthetic world only mere decades from now. In the year 2086, civilization has changed tremendously. There are no trees, books, or even natural water, and an enormous island-continent made of plastic has arrived to the coast of California.

In 2010, Arias was an artist-in-residence at the de Young Museum in San Francisco, where Beautiful Trash was first conceived conceptually with a series of objects and ephemeral art pieces.

Exhibiting now through out Aug. 4 (closing party), 2857 24th St (at Bryant), San Francisco, CA 94110. wwww.galeriadelaraza.org.

Third Biennial San Francisco International Poetry Festival

Celebrate the creative spirit at the third San Francisco International Poetry Festival, which brings more than 18 poets from all around the world to San Francisco for free and open-to-the-public poetry and music.

The four-day poetry extravaganza begins on Thursday, July 26, 2012 with a kick-off party hosted by Jack Hirschman, legendary Beat poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti and City Library Luis Herrera at Kerouac Alley in North Beach. The party features an introduction of participating poets and performances and readings by former Modern Lovers musician Jonathan Richman, former San Francisco Supervisor Matt Gonzales and more.

A lineup of great poets around the world include: Carla Badillo Coronado (Ecuador), Yahia Lababidi (Egypt) Alejandro Murguia (USA/Mexico), Sandro Sardella (Italy), Matt Sedillo (USA), Antonieta Villamil (Columbia), and many other from Europe and Philippines.

Additional Festivities include: Friday lunch-time poetry reading in the Civic Center Plaza, Outdoor poetry & performances on Saturday in Civic Center Plazm Poetry Crawl in North Beach, Youth poetry, Translation Workshops, Beat poetry lectures and more.

For more information and a complete schedule of events, visit SFIPF.org.

A panel discussion on the erosion of civil liberties

Renewal of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, allowing indefinite detention without charge, is being debated this summer. Our special speaker is Shahid Buttar, Executive Director, Bill of Rights Defense Committee. See http://sf99percent.org/.

Under the 2012 NDAA, the government can arrest you without charges, hold you indefinitely without trial, deny you a lawyer, and send you abroad to be imprisoned or tortured, based only on suspicion of association with terrorist groups. Part of this law is so vague it could apply to anyone.

A donation of $10 is requested, but nobody turned away. Wheelchair-accessible.

­Tuesday, July 31, 7 p.m., at the Oakland Peace Center, 111 Fairmount Ave (at 29th St.), Oakland one block East of Auto Row), AC Transit 51A, 635, 651, 851 buses.

Paulina Rubio will join Jenni Rivera and Beto Cuevas en La Voz de México

by the El Reportero wire services

Paulina RubioPaulina Rubio

Singer Paulina Rubio will participate in the television competition “La Voz de Mexico” this coming season, the producers said Thursday.

The “Chica Dorada” (Golden Girl) will join the team of mentors, which includes Jenni Rivera and Beto Cuevas, on the second season of the south-of-the-border version of NBC music competition show “The Voice.”

“La Voz de Mexico” broke audience records in its first season.

The 41-year-old Rubio, with a musical career that spans three decades, has managed to establish herself in the Latin American markets as well as in countries like Italy, France, Portugal, Japan, Turkey, Greece and the United States.

Currently, she is promoting her most recent album – “Brava,” which features the single “Me gustas tanto” – which made its debut with top sales figures in Spain, the United States and Mexico.

Grupo mexicano de rock hace ruido en la Gran Manzana

The Oats are new to the US but not to rock and roll. The four-piece band arrived in NYC from Mexico City a scant two weeks ago, and have already begun to leave their mark on the flourishing music scene.

Having booked 10 local shows before they even got The Big Apple, the group has already walked the red carpet at the New Music Seminar opening night party, wowed the audience at their first live concert at Brooklyn’s Public Assembly venue, and attended a preview screening of the soon to be released Katy Perry film-umentary.

The Oats made their first US TV debut on June 27 on the Internet sensation, The Rew & Who Show, broadcast live weekly from the heart of Manhattan’s new cultural center, the Lower East Side.

This appearance will mark the first in an ongoing residency by the band on the program. The show can be accessed internationally at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/rew-who.

The band’s songs are all written and sung in English, which prevents them from being played on the radio in their native Mexico, where only Spanish language lyrics are permitted for broadcast. Never mind – it won’t be long before THE OATS­’ music will be heard wafting from speakers all across America.

Oats have been booked every week from June 24 to Sept. 7.

Marc Anthony to Host Fundraisers

Global pop icon Marc Anthony and entrepreneur Henry Cardenas, president and CEO of Cardenas Marketing Network, announced they will host a series of fundraisers in August to benefit the Maestro Cares Foundation.

Maestro Cares is an initiative that was launched earlier this year. The three-event series aims to raise funds for the completion of a new residence hall and learning facility for over 200 children living at Orfanato Niños de Cristo, in La Romana, Dominican Republic.

The Dominican orphanage will be the first territory to directly benefit from the non-for-profit organization.

By providing children with education, recreation and other development programs at an orphanage, the Maestro Cares Foundation seeks to instill a culture that includes a strong work ethic, confidence, and discipline.

The island of the widows in Nicaragua

­by Orsetta Bellani

Image of the long protest that the Association of Relatives of those Affected by Chronic Kidney Failure (ANAIRC): hold in Managua since March 9, 2009. (PHOTO BY ORSETTA BELLANI)Image of the long protest that the Association of Relatives of those Affected by Chronic Kidney Failure (ANAIRC) hold in Managua since March 9, 2009. (PHOTO BY ORSETTA BELLANI)

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has taken three brothers and the father of Carmen Rios. All of them worked as laborers at Ingenio San Antonio, a sugar company of 40,000 hectares located in the Municipality of Chichigalpa, North West of Nicaragua. The mill is owned by Nicaragua Sugar Estate Ltd, part of Nicaraguan economic giant, Pellas Group. From the sugar cane, the company gets sugar, ethanol and the prestigious Rum Flor de Caña, exported worldwide.

The Pacific coast of Central America has been affected by the epidemic of CKD: in Salvador, chronic kidney failure is the leading cause of death among men, while among the Nicaraguan male population it has caused more victims than AIDS and diabetes together. However, the causes of the disease have not been fully elucidated.

In the Municipality of Chichigalpa, which has 45,000 inhabitants, about 7,000 people became ill from CKD. The family created the association ANAIRC (Nicaraguan Association of Those Affected by Chronic Kidney Failure), complaining that the Pellas Group is responsible for the deaths of their loved ones, former workers of Ingenio San Antonio. “The Pellas Group says they have nothing to do with the deaths and that pesticides banned in the United States, Canada and the European Union do not cause the disease”, explains Carmen Rios, president of ANAIRC. “ANAIRC was born in 2004 and the following year we marched along the 135 km between Chichigalpa and Managua. Since March 9th, 2009 we sit in this area in the center of the capital. We ask the Pellas Group to stop use pesticides that harm the health of workers and pollute the water that everyone drinks, we want to reforest the area and sit at a table of dialogue, to determine a compensation for the deaths and the damage they cause to our health. And we want people to know what’s behind the azure they consume, behind the rum they drink and the ethanol they put in their engines, they need to know that many people here in Nicaragua are dying.”

The community of La Isla (The Island)- sarcastically renamed “The Island of widows,” which is located within the Ingenio San Antonio and it’s completely surrounded by sugar cane fields, represents the most serious case of CKD. On The Island, 70 percent of men and 30 percent of women have been affected by kidney disease. In this place where the only option is to work in the mill, the first to get sick of CDK are laborers, but the disease also spreads to their families. This situation also causes many social and psychological problems, and creates a vicious circle that is very hard to exit, since the children of the deceased are still working in the same company.

“In 2006 the World Bank lent money to the Pellas Group to build the ethanol plant,” says Viola Cassetti from La Isla Foundation, a controversial foundation that works in Chichigalpa. “The workers filed a complaint alleging that some pesticides and the lack of adequate protections were causing an epidemic. The World Bank commissioned an investigation to Boston University, which after four years does not have a clear answer: it just published a report that said it did not find any direct connection between pesticides and CKD, but that it cannot exclude its existence. The epidemic can have various causes: it can be linked to pollution, and genetic factors may also influence. Another hypothesis that has been considered is the dehydration caused by excessive heat: laborers lose two liters of liquid every hour, so it’s a type of work that can be compared to running a race. They would have to drink ten liters of water a day and rest 45 minutes every 15 minutes of work.”

According to Martha Flores from the Recinos Inti Pacha Mama Managua association this explanation is too simple: “The heat is a characteristic of the climate of the area, it cannot be considered the cause of the that ease of all these people. In Chichigalpa, the water is contaminated with 18 different types of pesticides.” In fact, 98.7 percent of the wells are contaminated. The first to discover the presence of pesticides in the wells of Chichigalpa and bring up its links with CKD was Dr. Enrique Jose Rios Urbina, with the support of the laboratory analyses of the Autonomous University of Nicaragua. Dr. Rios Urbina, brother of the president of ANAIRC, worked at the hospital at Ingenio San Antonio, which is owned by the same Pellas Group and represents the only health facility in the ­area. According to reports the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal (PPT), which in October 2008 dealt with the case, “the witnesses alleged that the hospital concealed the real causes of the disease, and thus provides inadequate medical treatment. In the words of a particularly qualified witness, employers were fully aware of the facts and verbally oriented the medical professionals for failing to report on the diseases they suffered.”

When Dr. Rios Urbina made his finding public, he was fired. He later died from CKD.

 

­

Chávez gets his “knockout”

­

­by the El Reportero’s wire services

Hugo ChávezHugo Chávez

Honduran attorney Antonio Trejo, who represented peasants who have attempted to reclaim land in the Caribbean province of Colon, was murdered by unknown killers in Tegucigalpa, a human rights group announced Sunday.

Trejo was the legal adviser to the MARCA land reclamation movement and was shot to death Saturday night near the Toncontin International Airport, the Committee of Relatives of Disappeared Detainees in Honduras, or Cofadeh, said.

According to the versions of the murder published in the local media, Trejo attended a wedding on Saturday night in the southern capital neighborhood of America near the airport and when he left the noisy venue to answer a cell phone call he had received he was riddled with bullets by gunmen waiting outside. Trejo was taken to the state-run Escuela Hospital, where he died, the Cofadeh report added.

The attorney was brought to trial by the Public Ministry in August after a peasant demonstration in the capital in which the protesters, some of them from MARCA, were demanding land.

The protest was broken up by the National Police and several of the demonstrators were injured in the melee.

Trejo, Confadeh said, “played a significant role in the defense of the right to land by peasant cooperatives affiliated with MARCA: San Isidro, Despertar, San Esteban and La Trinidad.”

The attorney presented “legal motions for several years until he got a civil judge to issue a ruling that returned the lands to the peasants on June 29 of this year, 18 years after they were taken from them by landowners Miguel Facusse and Rene Morales,” Cofadeh said.

However, according to the humanitarian organization, during a Supreme Court recess, the landowners had their lawyers introduce a motion that was resolved in an illegal manner to benefit them.

On July 18, Trejo said at a press conference at Cofadeh headquarters that the landowners were influence peddling in the courts to reverse a ruling returning the lands to the MARCA peasants.

In Bajo Aguan, one of the most fertile areas of Honduras, groups of peasants are demanding land from the government. It is a tense region with frequent armed clashes between laborers and security guards working for local land Pro-­owners and over the past three years more than 60 people have been killed.

The violence has not fallen off despite the fact that the government signed an agreement with the landholders to buy more than 4,000 hectares (10,000 acres), some of it cultivated with African palm, from which palm oil is extracted, to return to the peasants.

Honduran authorities say that the clashes that continue to occur in the region are being provoked by armed criminal bands who say they are peasants.

Other groups of laborers who are demanding land are affiliated with the Unified Movement of Peasants of Aguan, or MUCA. (Reported by Hispanically Speaking News).

U.S. and Israel planning joint attack on Iran

by Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com

The Jerusalem Post reports today that the United States and Israel are planning a joint military operation to take out Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities.

The report appeared in Foreign Policy following a speech by presidential candidate Mitt Romney on foreign policy, including Obama’s stance on Iran.

“Iran today has never been closer to a nuclear weapons capability,” Romney said in a foreign policy address delivered at the Virginia Military Institute. “And it has never acted less deterred by America.”

CFR member and visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, David Rothkopf, reported that the White House and Israeli officials “assert that the two sides behind the scenes have come closer together in their views [regarding Iran] in recent days.”

According to the Post, Rothkopf quoted a “source close to the discussions” as saying that a surgical strike aimed at Iran’s enrichment facilities “might take only ‘a couple of hours’” at best and would be conducted by air using bombers and drones.

“Advocates for this approach,” according to Rothkopf, “argue that not only is it likely to be more politically palatable in the United States but, were it to be successful – meaning knocking out enrichment facilities, setting the Iranian nuclear program back many years, and doing so without civilian casualties – it would have region wide benefits. One advocate asserts it would have a ‘transformative outcome: saving Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, reanimating the peace process, securing the Gulf, sending an unequivocal message to Russia and China, and assuring American ascendancy in the region for a decade to come.’”

In addition to its nuclear program, the United States has stated it will attack Iran’s civilian population.

The U.S. is “reluctantly” considering additional covert action against Iran, according to the Christian Science Monitor. The plan calls for air strikes on power plants and other sites “that could impact Iranian civilian populations.”

In August, Richard Silverstein, who specializes in reporting on the Israeli national security state, posted a leaked document revealing details on the Israeli plan to strike Iran. The document states that Iran’s “internet, telephones, radio and television, communications satellites, and fiber optic cables leading to and from critical installations – including underground missile bases at Khorramabad ­and Isfahan – will be taken out of action” by the Israelis.

The nuclear reactor at Arak and the nuclear fuel production facilities at Isfahan will be targeted, according to the document. Other toxic chemical targets will be destroyed including “missile silos, storage tanks for chemical components of rocket fuel, industrial facilities for producing missile control systems, centrifuge production plants and more.”

In November, Eli Lake, writing for The Daily Beast, cited current and former U.S. intelligence officials who said Israel’s target list includes Iran’s electric grid, internet, cellphone network, and emergency frequencies for firemen and police officers.

“The existence of a program designed to cripple crucial civilian infrastructure not related to Iran’s nuclear program reveals that the Israeli-U.S. plan is to reduce the country to a Stone Age condition much the same way Iraq was leveled in 2003,” we wrote at the time.

On Oct.5, we reported on a report released by the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah delving into the human and environmental consequences of an Israeli military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.

“In our assessment, it is highly likely that the physical and thermal casualties as the result of the strikes will exceed 5,000 personnel at the nuclear sites. The secondary civilian casualties as a result of exposure to the release of toxic and radioactive materials could increase this number to over 80,000 citizens,” the executive summary states.

If the Foreign Policy report is correct, it now appears Israel and the United States may be ready to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities and produce a catastrophe that would rival Chernobyl in their toxic and deadly effects.

Seven ways to use honey for whatever ails you

by J. D. Heyes

Lots of us may like to use a little honey as a sweetener for our morning coffee, toast or tea, but there are several uses for this tasty little treat – in its pure, raw, non-pasteurized form, it can do more than just bring a smile to our face.

Manuka honey as the new ‘superfood.’ What is Manuka honey, scientifically known as Leptospermum Scoparium?

Well, it is honey that is produced by bees that pollinate Manuka trees, which grow almost exclusively in the East Cape region of New Zealand. Because it’s a bit of a rarity, it also tends to be pricier but according to Britain’s Telegraph newspaper, a recent survey of people who bought it showed that 58 percent believed

The island of the widows in Nicaragua it to be better than ordinary honey – even if they didn’t really know why. This might be why. Manuka honey has a long reputation for offering a number of health benefits.

For New Zealanders, local honey containing local pollen can help reduce the effects of hay fever, but for everyone else, Manuka honey has antiviral and antibacterial actions, which is why lots of people familiar with this superfood’s qualities down it at the first hint of a cold or sore throat.

“According to doctors, Manuka honey’s high sugar content creates a waterless environment in which the bacteria that are infecting a wound are unable to survive.

Also, thanks to the presence of an enzyme called glucose oxidase, it is acidic, which apparently adds to its unique antibacterial properties,” the Telegraph said.

“The therapeutic potential of uncontaminated, pure honey is grossly underutilized,” says Peter Molan, director of the Honey Research Unit at the University of Waikato in New Zealand.

“It is widely available in most communities and although the mechanism of action of several of its properties remains obscure and needs further investigation, the time has now come for conventional medicine to lift the blinds off this ‘traditional remedy’ and give it its due recognition.”

Honey as a natural energy booster. Do you down an energy bar or drink during your hectic day? Try a spoonful of honey instead; it’s been proven to deliver a significant boost of energy to athletes performing strenuous exercise.

“Numerous studies have singled out carbohydrates as a critical nutrient in endurance exercise,” says Richard Kreider of the University of Memphis Exercise and Sport Nutrition Laboratory. “Most of the studies to date have shown supplementation with glucose to provide the extra staying power. We were pleased to find that honey, a ‘cocktail’ of various natural sugars, performed just as well.”

Forget the fancy facial creams. Raw honey is exceptional for your face and skin, according to research. Try a “Gentle Honey Wash” consisting of a dollop of honey mixed with two tablespoons of warm water in the palm of your hand, then gently massage the mixture into your face or skin. “Honey has long been valued in Asia for its natural medicinal properties.

Combined with rice bran, honey is used there to treat diaper rash and even acne. Honey is also an excellent treatment for dry skin as it stimulates good circulation and helps to seal in moisture,” says holistic skin care expert Ettia Tal.

You can even make your own honey moisturizer, says travel and food writer Anna Brones: “If you’ve got a handful of sweet smelling herbs — think lavender — laying around and ready to be used, why not use them for your own homemade honey lotion? Warm honey over a saucepan until it gets to a liquid consistency. Pour honey over herbs and cap tightly; the ratio you want to use is one tablespoon of herbs per eight ounces of honey. Let sit for a week and then mix one teaspoon of liquid into an eight ounce bottle of unscented lotion.” Having trouble sleeping?

“A spoonful of honey before bed (by itself or in a cup of warm herbal tea) is a natural sleep remedy that can help you relax and fall asleep faster,” writes Natural News’ Elizabeth Walling. Suppress that cough and throat irritation. Pure, non-pasteurized honey is an excellent elixir for common wintertime ailments like coughs, colds and sore throats.

“Honey helps with coughs, particularly buckwheat honey. In a study of 110 children, a single ­dose of buckwheat honey was just as effective as a single dose of dextromethorphan in relieving nocturnal cough and allowing proper sleep,” writes health enthusiast and researcher Diana Herrington.

Boost your immune system with this natural antibiotic. According to recent research, defensin-1, a protein added to honey by bees, possesses antibacterial properties and could be used against drug-resistant bacteria.

This bee-produced protein “could one day be used to treat burns and skin infections and to develop new drugs that could combat antibiotic-resistant infections,” says a summary of the research published in the Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Balance the five elements “Honey has been used in ayurvedic medicine in India for at least 4000 years and is considered to affect all three of the body’s primitive material imbalances positively,” says Herrington.

“It is also said to be useful useful in improving eyesight, weight loss, curing impotence and premature ejaculation, urinary tract disorders, bronchial asthma, diarrhea, and nausea.”

This may be the United States, but don’t automatically asume you can vote

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin J. Ramirez

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: Ready for the election? Well, you must be ready, but is the ballot system ready for you? The following article, This may be America but don’t automatically assume you can vote, written by journalist Donna Anderson may bring some light to your expectations when you go to the polls. And even though there is no option for whom to vote for, at least there shouldn’t be any obstacles to voting for your candidate.

by Donna Anderson
Infowars.com

This is still America and everyone has the Constitutional right to cast their vote on Election Day but only 20 states will allow you to cast your vote without providing at least minimal identification, and most of them are working toward rectifying that situation even as we speak.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012, and the last day to register to vote is Tuesday, Oct. 9. With most states enacting stricter voter registration laws, it’s imperative that you make sure you’re registered as early as possible to allow time to gather up the necessary documents.

If you believe you’re already registered, think again. Almost every state in the Union has either changed their registration requirements or they have some type of voter registration legislation pending. If you’re planning to step up to the poll and make a difference with your vote, then you need to make sure your vote will be counted.

The single most important requirement across all states requiring voter ID is a state issued photo ID. That’s not to say that a photo ID is the only requirement, so again, don’t assume anything. To find out the exact voting requirements in your state visit the National Conference of State Legislatures website.

For the average American it would seem easy enough to get a driver’s license or some other form of photo ID that would be acceptable. But as Melissa Harris-Perry of MSNBC pointed out in her program on September 22, it’s not as easy as you might think.

According to Harris-Perry, restricted voting laws make it difficult for people of certain groups to qualify. The elderly, disabled, people of color, and students, in particular, are the groups least likely to have government issued ID. But in many cases, “Laws requiring a voter’s legal name to match the name on their photo ID could pose a problem at the polls for women who’ve changed their name through marriage or divorce. Women face considerable barriers to even getting a valid ID.”

Recent legislation passed in Pennsylvania makes it even tougher for women to vote. According to Harris-Perry, if you’re a man it’s easy. If your name is Joseph E. Voter your name can show up as Joe or J or Earl and that’s acceptable. But if you’re a woman, you need to provide proof using your legal name.

In the U.S. women change their name in 90 percent of marriages and divorces. Additionally, 52 percent of women age 18 and over don’t have their legal name on the birth certificate, and 34 percent of voting age women don’t have proof of citizenship under their legal name. An alarming 34 percent of voting age women with access to proof of citizenship have no documents with their current legal name, which means that as many as 32 million women without these documents will not be able to vote.

Elderly African American women are hit hardest, especially in large metropolitan areas. They may never have learned to drive so they won’t have a driver’s license. They may not have a birth certificate because they were born in segregated hospitals. And their name may have changed because they were married and divorced.

During the 2008 election almost one million more women turned out at the polls than men. If the same thing happens this year, these stricter voting laws can cancel out a lot of those votes and have a major effect on the outcome.

Each of the fifty states has its own voter registration laws. These laws are being enacted supposedly to prevent voter fraud but they’re really being used to manipulate election results, which is why it’s so important that you check to make sure you meet all the requirements – even if you’ve been registered for years. But registration requirements aren’t the only things that have changed.

In 32 states and the District of Columbia, any qualified voter may cast an early vote during a pre-designated period prior to Election day. However, you can’t just walk in and say you want to cast your vote, you still need to be registered, although some states allow you to register at the same time you’re casting your early vote. In some states you have to have a verifiable reason for why you want to vote early, such as a military assignment or a medical reason. Early voting periods can vary from state to state.

If you’re in the military or for whatever reason you reside in another state or country during part of the year you can request an absentee ballot. All states allow absentee voting however, in 21 states an excuse is required, while 27 states and the District of Columbia permit any qualified voter to vote by absentee ballot without offering an excuse. In eight states and the District of Columbia you can be issued a permanent absentee ballot so you never have to go to the polls again.

Of course, passing all of your state’s voter requirements and stepping up to the poll to actually cast your vote still doesn’t mean your vote will be counted, or that it’ll be counted properly.

Polls are open from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. on Election Day and anyone standing in line at 6 p.m. is guaranteed the opportunity to vote.

However, in most states the polls officially close at 8 p.m. It’s up to the discretion of each polling place whether or not they want to extend the hours beyond 8 p.m. But if they do and you cast your vote after 8 p.m. you’ll be forced to use a provisional ballot, which means your vote probably won’t ever be counted. If you don’t meet the voter registration requirements of your state you’ll also be issued a provisional ballot, assuming of course they actually let you vote.

Provisional ballots are kept separate from the regular ballots and the theory is that they are eventually counted, whether they change the results of the election or not. However, they’re only counted if you return to verify your eligibility within 2 or 3 days, depending on the state, if they’re counted at all. Only those provisional ballots deemed eligible are then counted on the second Wednesday after the election, and we all know how much weight they carry. More often than not the winner is declared before the polls even close.

It might seem prudent to vote early or use an absentee ballot, or even vote by mail if it’s available in your state. That way you can assure your vote will be there well before the deadline and it’ll be included in the count.

­But it’s important to note that unless there’s a challenge to the count, your vote might be left sitting in a mail bag in the back room of some warehouse and never get counted. And if there is a challenge and those mailbags are opened, your vote may be discounted for any number of reasons and you’ll never know about it.

Contrary to popular opinion, there is no oversight committee that stands there in the mail rooms manually checking and rechecking every single mail-in vote cast during an election. In some states you can ask for verification that your mail-in vote was counted but there’s really no way for you to be sure, or to even be sure that it was counted as a vote for the candidate you chose.

Donna Anderson writes for Examiner.com.

Third-party candidate on the ballot in 50 states, files lawsuit

Demands inclusion in presidential debates

Gary JohnsonGary Johnson

Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate for President – who is currently polling at around 5 percent of the vote – and his vice presidential running mate, retired Judge Jim Gray, have filed an antitrust lawsuit against the Democrats, Republicans, & the Commission on Presidential Debates for antitrust and anti-competitive acts. The voters deserve competition! The lawsuit comes after the PDC’s failure to respond to the following letter from Johnson last month:

Dear [Commission Member]

I am writing to request that the national Commission on Presidential Debates reconsider your current exclusionary requirements for participation in this fall’s Presidential and Vice-Presidential debates.

I am well aware of the history and genesis of the Commission, including the reality that it was created largely by the respective national leadership of the Democrat and Republican Parties. While I respect and understand the intention to provide a reasonable and theoretically nonpartisan structure for the presidential debate process, I would suggest that the Commission’s founding, organization and policies are heavily skewed toward limiting the debates to the two major parties.

Many credible polls indicate that a full 1/3 of the electorate do not clearly identify with either of those parties. Rather, they are independents whose voting choices are not determined by party affiliation. That 1/3 of the voters, as well as independent-thinking Republicans and Democrats, deserve an opportunity to see and hear a credible “third party” candidate. I understand that there are a great many “third party” candidates, and that a line must be drawn somewhere. However, the simple reality of our Electoral College system draws that line in a very straightforward and fair way – a reality that is reflected in your existing criteria. If a candidate is not on the ballot in a sufficient number of states to be elected by the Electoral College, it is perfectly logical to not include that candidate in a national debate. If, on other hand, a candidate IS on the ballot in enough states to be elected, there is no logic by which that candidate should be excluded.

Nowhere in the Constitution or in law is it written that our President must be a Democrat or a Republican. However, it IS written that a candidate must receive a majority of the votes – or at least 50% – cast by electors, and that any candidate who does so, and otherwise meets the Constitution’s requirements, may be President.

As the Libertarian Party’s nominees for Vice-President and President, Judge Jim Gray and I have already qualified to be on the ballot in more than enough states to obtain a majority in the Electoral College, and we are the only candidates other than the Republican and Democrat nominees to have done so.

However, the Commission has chosen to impose another requirement for participation: 15% in selected public opinion polls. Unlike your other requirements, this polling performance criterion is entirely arbitrary. Requiring a certain level of approval in the polls has nothing to do with fitness to serve, experience or credibility as a potential President. Rather, it has everything to do with the hundreds of millions of dollars available to and spent by the two major party candidates, the self-fulfilling bias of the news media against the viability of third party candidates, and an ill-founded belief that past dominance of the Republican and Democrat Parties should somehow be a template for the future.

It is not the proper role of a non-elected, private and tax-exempt organization to narrow the voters’ choices to only the two major party candidates. To the contrary, debates are the one element of modern campaigns and elections that should be immune to unfair advantages based upon funding and party structure. Yet, it is clear that the Commission’s criteria have both the intent and the effect of limiting voters’ choices to the candidates of the two major parties who, in fact, created the Commission in the first place.

­Eliminating the arbitrary polling requirement would align the Commission’s procedure for deciding who may participate in the critical debates with fairness and true non-partisanship, and it would not disrupt the process or make it unmanageable. Rather, it would simply allow the participation of a two-term governor who has more executive experience than Messrs. Obama and Romney combined, who has garnered sufficiently broad support to be on the ballot in more than enough states to achieve a majority in the Electoral College, and who, without the help of party resources and special interests, has attracted enough financial support to qualify for presidential campaign matching funds.

I urge you to remove the partisanship from the debates, and allow the voters an opportunity to hear from all of the qualified candidates – not just those who happen to be a Democrat or a Republican.

Thank you.

Governor Gary Johnson

Know your propositions

Your “yes” vote on one California proposition can save public education; a “no” vote on another can protect workers

by Zenei Cortez

Are you one of those voters who is absolutely sure for whom you are going to vote on November 6? Great!

Do you know how you are going to vote on the 11 propositions that will also be on the California ballot this year? If not, don’t worry. There is still time to study them and be an informed voter when you get into the ballot box.

What are propositions and why should you care?

In California, a ballot proposition is a proposed law that is presented to the voters for approval in a direct election. It can be a constitutional amendment or an ordinary statute. The California State Legislature can introduce propositions. But in a great example of what a democracy is, any California voter can put an initiative or proposition on the ballot if the qualifying steps are followed.

Now, if you are thinking, “I don’t have time to waste on figuring out my vote on the propositions. What difference does it make anyway?” Consider the following.

As far back as 1912, a proposition to abolish the death penalty failed to garner enough votes to pass. In 1979, there were 39 initiatives on the ballot and only three passed!

If you want an example that hits closer to home, consider Proposition 209, the California Civil Rights Initiative, which was passed in November 1996. It amended the state constitution to prohibit state government institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public constitution (think state college enrollment), public employment or public contracting.

And then there was Proposition 227, known as the English for the Children Initiative, which was passed in 1998. It effectively dismantled bilingual education in the state. This despite research that continues to show that bilingual works.

This year, two ballots demand your attention, and we hope your “yes” and “no” vote.

Proposition 30—the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act

Proposition 30 prevents $6 billion in schools cuts, puts money back into California’s schools and colleges, and protects students by keeping the school year from being shortened and class sizes increased. It also keeps cops on the street, balances the state budget and protects taxpayers and protects patient safety standards. Vote “YES” on Proposition 30.

Proposition 32—the Paycheck Protection Initiative

Proposition 32 is an attack on labor. It poses a threat to minimum wage, retirement pay, health care benefits, Workmen’s Compensation and many more workers’ safeguards. As written, proposition 32 effectively removes the right of unions to raise money for political campaigns in California. It only serves the very rich and large corporations. Vote ”NO” on Proposition 32.

To learn more about all of this year’s propositions, visit the California Secretary of State Web site: ­http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov.

Zenei Cortez is the Co-President of the California Nurses Association and Vice President of National Nurses United with 185,000 members across the USA.