Tuesday, September 1, 2026
Home Blog Page 148

The film “Sansón and I” portrays the reality of many young migrants

Screenshot

by Magdy Zara

Sansón and I, is an emotional documentary about a 19-year-old undocumented Mexican migrant, who is sentenced to life in prison without parole, and Rodrigo Reyes (filmmaker), who was the young man’s translator during the trial and remains deeply moved by the events, they become friends and then he decides to record a film to publicize his story, since according to what he says “it is a reality that is still valid”.

Reyes, who is the director of this masterful film production, states that he had no way of knowing more details about the case and the history of Sansón, since he did not have access to his records or files, which is why they begin to exchange cards.

After more than seven years writing to each other and more than a thousand letters, he decides to tell his story; For this, he travels to Sansón’s hometown, listens to testimonies of his life, meets his family, who help him with the making of the film, even collaborated as natural actors, which makes the production much more real. . His nephew Toñito plays the child Sansón and his sister Débora plays his mother.

Regarding the documentary, the director explains that it mixes a bit of fiction with harsh reality, “10 years ago I was working for a California court and they assigned me a homicide case, in which a 19-year-old Mexican was involved, who for three weeks I was practically speaking in his ear, after his sentence, I could not be calm and I wanted to know more about him”, there began what would later be a beautiful friendship.

“This film”, – he continues saying- “is the portrait of our friendship, what makes me the happiest. It is that my friend Sansón, being at the bottom, in the darkest, was able to get out of the cell, raise his voice and make themselves known”, says the filmmaker.

He says that what motivated him to publicize the story of Sansón is that “there are thousands of Sansóns who are forgotten and condemned in the prisons of the United States, and the worst thing is that the problems that these young people face in their countries of origin and when crossing the border they are still valid, they are still there and they are repeated day after day.”

When asked what he was looking for by showing this painful reality, Reyes responded by saying “I want us to accompany our migrant brothers, to be in solidarity with them, to raise awareness, to open our hearts to the thousands of Sansóns who are in prison, to be empathetic with the young people for whom the American dream has turned into a horrible nightmare.”

Rodrigo Reyes, who is also Mexican, has produced several documentaries on the subject of migration.

Sansón and I, premiered at the 2022 Tribeca Independent Film Festival in New York; in Mexico at the Morelia Film Festival and in San Francisco it was presented on Saturday, March 18 at the Roxie Theater in San Francisco.

spot_img

“It is completely undemocratic”: López Obrador rejects the possible arrest of Trump

RT – Latin America

 

The former US president assured that he will be arrested this Tuesday and called on his followers to protest

The president of Mexico, Andrés Manuel López Obrador, spoke on Tuesday about the possible arrest of former US president Donald Trump, something he described as “undemocratic.”

“Former President Trump is declaring that they are going to arrest him, I think today, for a supposed love affair,” López Obrador said during his morning press conference.

For the Mexican president, if the arrest takes place, the reason for this process would be the Republican’s political ban: “We are not sucking our fingers, which is so that it does not appear on the ballot,” he said.

“If I say this it is because I suffered from the fabrication of a crime, because they did not want me to be a candidate and that is completely undemocratic, because the people are not allowed to be the ones to decide,” he commented.

What Trump assures

The Mexican president spoke about it, after Trump assured that he will be arrested this Tuesday and called on his followers to protest.

“The main Republican candidate and former president of the United States will be arrested on Tuesday of next week. Protest, take back our nation!” Trump said through his Truth Social social network last Saturday, after denouncing that “American patriots They are being arrested and held captive.”

Trump could be charged with alleged felony falsifying business records and violating campaign finance laws by arranging a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels through her then-attorney, Michael Cohen, to change from his silence about alleged sexual encounters with the tycoon in 2006, which the former president denies.

Should he be indicted, it would be the first time a former US president has been charged and could turn his race upside down for the 2024 presidential election.

If he is charged, the way law enforcement prosecutes the former president could be unlike any other defendant in the country’s history. Although you may be fingerprinted and have a photo taken for police records, you will not be taken in handcuffs before TV cameras or placed in a cell. He will likely remain in the custody of Secret Service agents assigned to protect him, Bloomberg reported, citing a source familiar with the matter.

spot_img

House GOP chairmen ask Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg to testify on Trump probe

Shared from Rebecca Shabad and Ali Vitali and Kyle Stewart and Jesse Rodríguez

NBC News

 

Updated March 20, 2023, 4:16 PM –

 

WASHINGTON — Three House Republican committee chairmen sent Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg a letter Monday requesting he testify before Congress “about what plainly appears to be a politically motivated prosecutorial decision” in any potential indictment of former President Donald Trump in the prosecutor’s hush money probe.

“You are reportedly about to engage in an unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority: the indictment of a former president of the United States and current declared candidate for that office,” the letter said.

It comes ahead of a pending New York grand jury decision in the case.

“This indictment comes after years of your office searching for a basis — any basis — on which to bring charges, ultimately settling on a novel legal theory untested anywhere in the country and one that federal authorities declined to pursue,” the GOP lawmakers continued. “If these reports are accurate, your actions will erode confidence in the evenhanded application of justice and unalterably interfere in the course of the 2024 presidential election.”

The letter was signed by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio; House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky.; and House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil, R-Wis.

The letter is not a subpoena, but it marks the first investigatory action from the committees after House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., promised to scrutinize the people who have been investigating Trump.

The GOP chairmen argued that the Bragg’s “star witness” is former longtime Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who they alleged has a “serious credibility problem.” They asked that Bragg share documents since January 2017 of communications between his office and the Justice Department as well as other documents related to Trump. The chairmen asked that Bragg testify in a transcribed interview “about these matters as soon as possible,” and requested he provide the documents and contact committee staff to schedule his interview no later than 10 a.m. on Thursday.

A spokesperson for the DA’s office responded to the letter Monday saying, “We will not be intimidated by attempts to undermine the justice process, nor will we let baseless accusations deter us from fairly applying the law.”

“In every prosecution, we follow the law without fear or favor to uncover the truth. Our skilled, honest and dedicated lawyers remain hard at work,” the spokesperson added.

The request for Bragg’s testimony comes after Trump said Saturday that “illegal leaks” indicated he would be arrested Tuesday and called on supporters to protest. In posts on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump referred to reports that he could soon face possible criminal charges in New York related to a hush money payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Trump did not say Saturday whether he had been informed by law enforcement of a coming indictment. A spokesperson for Trump later clarified in a statement that there “has been no notification, other than illegal leaks from the Justice Dept. and the DA’s office, to NBC” and other news outlets.

NBC News reported Friday that law enforcement agencies are prepping for a possible Trump indictment as early as this week.

The grand jury likely hasn’t returned an indictment yet because its members were hearing testimony Monday from attorney Robert “Bob” Costello, a former legal adviser to Trump’s ex-longtime lawyer, Michael Cohen.

Over the weekend, congressional Republicans expressed support for Trump ahead of the grand jury’s possible decision. At the House GOP Conference’s retreat in Orlando, Florida, McCarthy gave a full-throated defense of Trump, dismissing Bragg’s investigation as politically motivated and saying the prosecutor is uninterested in cracking down on rising crime in New York City.

McCarthy, however, urged calm and said Americans shouldn’t protest if the former president is indicted and arrested.

 

spot_img

BREAKING on Silicon Valley Bank collapse: Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and FDIC

Submitted by the US Treasury:
WASHINGTON, DC — The following statement was released by Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen, Federal Reserve Board Chair Jerome H. Powell, and FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg:

Today we are taking decisive actions to protect the U.S. economy by strengthening public confidence in our banking system. This step will ensure that the U.S. banking system continues to perform its vital roles of protecting deposits and providing access to credit to households and businesses in a manner that promotes strong and sustainable economic growth.

After receiving a recommendation from the boards of the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, and consulting with the President, Secretary Yellen approved actions enabling the FDIC to complete its resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, in a manner that fully protects all depositors. Depositors will have access to all of their money starting Monday, March 13.  No losses associated with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank will be borne by the taxpayer.

We are also announcing a similar systemic risk exception for Signature Bank, New York, New York, which was closed today by its state chartering authority. All depositors of this institution will be made whole.  As with the resolution of Silicon Valley Bank, no losses will be borne by the taxpayer.

Shareholders and certain unsecured debtholders will not be protected. Senior management has also been removed. Any losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund to support uninsured depositors will be recovered by a special assessment on banks, as required by law.

Finally, the Federal Reserve Board on Sunday announced it will make available additional funding to eligible depository institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors.

The U.S. banking system remains resilient and on a solid foundation, in large part due to reforms that were made after the financial crisis that ensured better safeguards for the banking industry. Those reforms combined with today’s actions demonstrate our commitment to take the necessary steps to ensure that depositors’ savings remain safe.

spot_img

11th Annual Watsonville Film Festival

Compiled by Magdy Zara

 

With more than 40 new films, the 11th Watsonville Film Festival is currently taking place, with productions from Latino filmmakers with stories to entertain audiences, inspire and promote positive change.

This year’s festival features an exciting lineup of more than 40 films about ordinary people overcoming great obstacles to do the extraordinary, all focusing on issues relevant to the community.

Another aspect to highlight this year is that the festival includes world premieres of local short films and award-winning films.

The opening night was attended by actor Pepe Serna, who has appeared in more than 100 films and 300 television programs. Serna presented his latest films, Abuelo and Life is Art, followed by a question and answer session with Luis Reyes, director of the film and author of “Viva Hollywood.”

One of the particularities of this year is that the event is open to the public, accessible to all who want to attend, on a “pay what you can” basis, thanks to the generous sponsors and collaborators of the festival.

The main objective of the 11th Watsonville Film Festival is to empower local youth through video production and film culture as a way to transform the world, in addition to promoting cultural and economic development through the cinematic arts. .

The Festival takes place from March 3-12, at the Mello Center and Watsonville Public Library, with online viewing opportunities also available.

 

National anti-war protest

After the first anniversary of the war between Russia and Ukraine, and the recent visit of US President Joe Biden to Kiev, the anti-war movement in the United States, made up of 200 organizations, has planned a national protest against the war.

“Every day, the US war machine brings the world closer to unprecedented disaster. The Pentagon is determined to escalate all possible sources of tension: with Russia in the Ukraine, with China in Taiwan and many other cases. This powerful show of unity from organizations across the country is exactly what is needed at such a dangerous time,” the organizers said.

This demonstration will take place next Saturday, March 18, in several cities of the country simultaneously. In San Francisco it will take place at 12 p.m. In the Pacific Mission and 24th street BART.

For its part, the central protest will be on March 18, at 1 p.m., Eastern Washington DC time, in the vicinity of The White House.

 

13th San Francisco Salsa Festival

The facilities of the San Francisco Airport Marriot hotel will be the setting of the 13th San Francisco Salsa Festival, during these three nights there will be world-class performances, dancing, competitions, performances, social dancing, DJs, and workshops with the best salsa instructors in San Francisco.

The organizers of the event informed that for every night there will be live bands guests.

They further added “for the last 21 years we have traveled all over the world, from Mexico to China, Korea, Japan, Canada, England and Italy. We have had the opportunity to live abroad, give workshops and shows, and live an amazing life in the global salsa community.”

Along the way -they continued saying- we have been to the most incredible salsa congresses and festivals. We made a lot of friends and met the most amazing dancers in the world. Nothing would have been possible without this beautiful dance that we call salsa and it is because of them that we want to share it with you.

Regarding the value of the tickets, they reported that there will be discounts for large groups or students. For more information, contact them at liz@johnandlizproductions.com and for schedules, list of artists and information about the competition, visit http://sfsalsafestival.com. http://www.sfsalsafefestival.com/ or 510-697-1892.

The 13th San Francisco Salsa Festival will take place March 20-23.

 

Car and motorcycle exhibition

Several classic car and motorcycle clubs in the San Francisco Bay area have organized a Show & Shine showcasing more than 100 of the best from The Bays.

The free-admission event will include entertainment from several of the Bay Area’s favorite singers, including comedian Dennis Gaxiola, singers Martin Cantu, Akki Starr and more will perform, and will feature a special appearance by the band Malo with Richard Bean.

This will be a family activity, to be held on Saturday, April 1, starting at 11 a.m. until 7 p.m.,

The Hope Fest SF will be held in e

spot_img

Is California breaking its promise to cut health care costs?

by Kristen Hwang

 

California set up a fund to cut out-of-pocket costs for those enrolled in Covered California, but Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposed budget shifts that money to other expenses

Brian Iv works in a factory in Orange County, earning around $26 per hour. He suffers chronic pain from a lifetime of manual labor jobs and previous workplace injuries, but often treats the pain with home remedies or traditional Cambodian practices. Going to the doctor is too expensive, he said.

Iv recently got a raise and was able to purchase health insurance through his company, but for a long time he had a Covered California Silver Plan, a mid-tier plan under the state’s version of the federal Affordable Care Act marketplace. A visit to a primary care doctor cost nearly $50, and every time Iv picked up a prescription it was an additional $10 to $15. It was a lot for someone living paycheck-to-paycheck with little wiggle room in the budget.

“Right now, after COVID-19, everything is expensive,” Iv said. “Sometimes when you get sick you avoid that (expense). You have to keep the money to pay the rent, pay the bills, pay the car.”

Mid-tier health coverage like Iv’s Silver Plan is widely considered the best value for people who have insurance through Covered California. But in the past nine years, deductibles for the Silver Plan have grown nearly 88% after adjusting for inflation, increasing out-of-pocket costs for enrollees. In raw numbers, last year deductibles grew from $3,700 for an individual and $7,400 for a family with a Silver Plan to $4,750 and $9,500, respectively.

That’s why health care advocates are miffed that Gov. Gavin Newsom’s  budget proposal would sweep away $333.4 million set aside a couple of years ago for the state to defray health care costs for middle-income residents, transferring the money to the general fund. The proposal to move money out of the Health Care Affordability Reserve Fund is temporary, with plans to restore it in 2025 when current federal subsidies expire. But advocates say inflationary pressures and rising health care costs are reasons to use that money right now to help Californians struggling to pay the bills.

“We recognize there’s not a lot of room for new spending in the current budget situation, but we don’t see this as new spending. We see this as the existing commitment,” said Diana Douglas, policy director for Health Access California, which sponsored legislation to create the reserve fund.

The budget transfer idea is part of Newsom’s strategy to address a projected $22.5 billion deficit this year, a deficit that the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office predicts may be even worse come May when the budget will be revised based on actual state revenue.

Newsom’s spokespeople ignored multiple requests for comment.

Given the inflationary pressure people like Iv face, the governor’s proposal to transfer the money into the general fund is “mystifying,” said Scott Graves, director of research at the California Budget and Policy Center, a nonprofit policy research group.

“Why is the governor borrowing from a special fund that was set up specifically to help make health coverage through Covered California more affordable, right?” Graves said. “This is money for which every penny in the account could right now be used to bring down the cost of health care for Californians, but instead the governor is choosing to sweep that money out of the account.”

Stories like Iv’s are common, said Jaquelinne Molina, a caseworker at The Cambodian Family, a social services center where Iv receives case management for health care and financial aid issues. Most of the people she serves work in warehouses and factories for low pay and no benefits.

“It’s three years after COVID, but people are still behind on their light bills, their water bills from 2020 because they weren’t able to work due to COVID,” Molina said. “Right now everything is tight and it gets harder and harder every year.”

Broken promise?

Health care advocates say Newsom’s latest budget proposal follows a pattern of missed opportunities to make insurance more affordable under Covered California.

In 2020, the Legislature voted to reinstate a tax penalty on residents without health insurance in an effort to bring costs down. The economic theory goes: The penalty incentivizes people to buy health insurance, and the more people who participate in the health care marketplace, the lower the costs because risk is spread out among a mix of healthy and less-healthy consumers.

But that measure passed despite concern from advocates and legislators about forcing people who can’t afford insurance to purchase it. Most people who forego insurance cite high cost as the primary barrier.

“Advocates, including ourselves, clearly stated that we do not support the reinstatement of the penalty without additional assistance,” said Linda Nguy, a lobbyist for the Western Center for Law and Poverty.

Early on, that was the plan. In fact, on his first day in office, Newsom proposed using the money to bring down prices for people with Covered California.

“The governor, to his credit, proposed this idea of providing state subsidies in Covered California, augmenting the federal dollars, and proposed the individual mandate as a funding source for it,” Health Access Executive Director Anthony Wright said.

Influential advocacy groups supported reinstating the health insurance penalty, and the 2019-2020 budget included more than $1.4 billion over three years to bring down out-of-pocket costs for Covered California enrollees.

So far, the state has only kept that promise once, spending approximately $355 million in 2020 to enhance Covered California subsidies for middle-income residents. This meant an individual making up to $74,940 and a family of four earning up to $154,500 qualified for additional financial assistance. But when the federal government increased health care subsidies in 2021 as part of its COVID-19 pandemic relief package, the state stopped funneling penalty money toward cost reduction.

Kaiser Health News reported in November that the state has generated roughly $1.3 billion in penalty money from uninsured state residents. By statute, that money has always gone directly into the general fund, and from there could be moved into the reserve fund.

“There’s an argument to be made that those fines really should be plowed back into the system, especially for people who are low-income,” said former state Sen. Richard Pan, a doctor who chaired the health committee at the time the penalty was reinstated.

The remaining $1 billion originally budgeted for subsidies in 2021 and 2022 — roughly the same amount generated by the penalty — has never been spent on bringing down health care costs. Instead, it has stayed in the general fund.

“What we think has been happening, and there truly is not a lot of transparency on this, is that as money is put into the reserve, it is taken out the following year,” Douglas with Health Access said.

Who relies on Covered California?

Most people who purchase insurance through Covered California are low- to middle-income Californians, meaning individuals who earn roughly between $21,000 and $87,000 a year or families of four earning $45,000 to $180,000 per year.

At that income level, enrollees make too much money to qualify for Medi-Cal, the state’s public insurance for very low-income residents, but for a variety of reasons don’t have employer-based health insurance. They may be self-employed, a gig or part-time worker, or work for a small business. They may even opt to purchase insurance independently because it’s cheaper than what their employer offers.

Although more stable than the national insurance marketplace, Covered California has not been immune to the rising health care costs that plague the industry. Health insurance premiums have grown every year since the state first offered Covered California. That growth is less obvious than deductibles to enrollees because federal subsidies keep out-of-pocket premiums relatively stable for most enrollees. But federal subsidies are based on federal income limits and poverty levels, which don’t take into account California’s high cost of living.

Iv and his family rent a single room in a house in Garden Grove for $900 a month. In the past year, he said, expenses have tripled with inflation, with gas alone costing around $300 per month.

“At home, sometimes we don’t know what to cook and we don’t have food. Then we eat Cup Noodles,” Iv said.

Molina, the case worker from The Cambodian Family, said her clients who have deductibles and co-pays use their insurance less than clients with Medi-Cal, who typically don’t have to pay anything out-of-pocket.

“I’ve known families with kids who break or sprain their fingers and feet, and they don’t know for months because they can’t go to the doctor,” Molina said.

The federal government’s relief plan helped people afford Covered California. It lowered monthly premiums by 20%, and more than 90% of enrollees were eligible for financial help. The result was a record number of people signing up for health insurance last year: 1.8 million, a 9% bump from the previous year.

But when the American Rescue Plan was at risk of expiring in 2022, legislators and regulators saw an opportunity to lessen the staggering health insurance costs enrollees would face — double what they paid the year before. They proposed reinjecting penalty money back into the Covered California marketplace, as promised, for the first time since 2020.

In June, the Covered California board approved a $300-million cost-reduction plan: If the federal subsidies were not renewed, the money would be used to help alleviate the resulting out-of-pocket premium spikes. If subsidies were extended, the money would be used to eliminate deductibles for all Silver Plans.

Either way, the money would make health care more affordable. When the federal government opted to extend premium assistance until 2025, affordability advocates were excited by the chance to remove other cost barriers.

“Let’s get rid of deductibles,” Pan said. “Because what is a deductible? It’s just really a barrier to people being able to get care.”

To enforce the plan, Pan carried and Health Access sponsored a bill that would have required the state to bring down costs for Covered California enrollees. Newsom vetoed the bill, citing a “downturn in revenues” despite the state budget already including more than $300 million to implement the plan.

When the bill died, Covered California lost the ability to implement the plan, said James Scullary, spokesperson for the program. Instead, Silver Plan deductibles that would have been eliminated jumped about 20%.

“Covered California’s position is we are always looking for ways to make health care more affordable,” Scullary said. While deductibles have climbed, pharmacy costs decreased and out-of-pocket maximums remained relatively stable.

Some advocacy groups say they’re dismayed that increased cost-sharing is “not a priority for Gov. Newsom.” The majority of small business owners are middle-income Californians who often have trouble affording health insurance and find it too expensive to offer to their employees, said Bianca Blomquist, California policy and outreach director for the Small Business Majority.

“We are super disappointed,” Blomquist said. “If we’re talking about small businesses’ ability to recover from the pandemic, these are the kinds of programs that might not be obvious, but really help.” (Kristen Hwang reports on health care and policy for CalMatters.)

spot_img

Tucker Carlson exposes the January 6 insurrection hoax and is denounced by leaders of the Republican Party and, of course, the whore media

Paul Craig Roberts

The Democrat Party, Department of Justice, and US Media stand revealed as utterly corrupt and venal, an evil satanic force

 

by Paul Craig Roberts

 

The Speaker of the House of Representatives, Republican Kevin McCarthy, released video tapes of the alleged “January 6 Insurrection” to Tucker Carlson, who used the video evidence to demonstrate on his popular Fox News program that the “insurrection” was a hoax created by Democrats, media whores, federal agents, and Capitol Police. The rioting was done by federal agents pretending to be protesters and, with the police, acting as provocateurs.

For example, Carlson showed a video of Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick, who according to Democrats and whore media was beaten to death by “insurrectionists” on January 6 and died from head injuries, walking around inside the capital keeping protesters who had been allowed in the Capitol in line after he allegedly was murdered by Trump insurrectionists. Carlson reports the autopsy report from the Washington, D.C. Medical Examiner’s Office that rules Sicknick died from natural causes on January 7 unrelated to events on January 6, not from “death in the line of duty courageously defending Congress and the Capitol” as the Democrats’ Capitol police and whore media claimed.

Sicknick family members, who hoped to financially capitalize on his death disputed Carlson’s factual report, but a family member some time ago disputed the beating death, and Carlson showed video footage of Sicknick wearing a helmet.

The greatest outcries came from Rino (republicans in name only) “Republicans,” such as Mitch McConnell, the leader of “Republicans” in the Senate who denounced Carlson for telling the truth. For honored Members of the Establishment like McConnell, truth is disruptive and very unwelcome. McConnell sees Carlson as an obstacle to getting rid of Trump, who is a threat to the Establishment and must be exiled from political life.

McConnell was not the only Republican protesting the truth. North Carolina Republican Thom Tillis, Louisiana Republican John Kennedy, South Dakota Republican Mike Rounds, and of course the whore media, such as CBS, lied through their teeth, again claiming Sicknick was beaten to death. For CBS and the whore media, this is a chance to get Carlson. Just as Senate Republican Leader McConnell was a powerful ally of Democrats in getting rid of Trump, he has allied himself with Democrats in an effort to be rid of Carlson. Why do Senate Republicans choose for their leader a person who represents the ruling elite instead of the American people?

My most horrendous thought is that Kevin McCarthy’s critics are correct that McCarthy is himself part of the establishment and has given Carlson doctored videos in order to discredit him. Apparently, this is not the case. The real story is coming out. Unlike the presstitute media, The Epoch Times, available both online and in print, is providing objective reporting: https://www.theepochtimes.com/newly-released-surveillance-footage-challenges-official-jan-6-narrative_5105498.html?utm_source=Morningbrief&src_src=Morningbrief&utm_campaign=mb-2023-03-08&src_cmp=mb-2023-03-08&utm_medium=email&est=iKBavkQInuZMMZGIAmpJr50OkWmzos2HFpLgn9Z6OIRFrG996z20zQ%3D%3D 

The whore media, the Department of Justice (sic), the Democrats and Rino Republicans will lie, and lie, and lie. Will Americans continue to trust them and, thereby, be shorn of any possibility of representation in Congress? Are Americans too dense and too trusting of authority to remain a free people? The ruling establishment has them and will not voluntarily let go.

Currently the Justice (sic) Department is doing all it can to prevent attorneys for the wrongly accused Trump supporters from delaying the kangaroo trials and coerced plea bargains until they can view the 41,000 hours of video evidence that has been withheld from the defendants. I suspect that the corrupt Biden Justice (sic) Department has gamed this and that all is in the hands of corrupt Democrat judges and corrupt Democrat prosecutors. The January 6 Insurrection is a coup against those citizens who have figured out that American democracy has been replaced by an elite oligarchy in which the people have no voice.

The convictions of the “Trump insurrectionists” were either coerced plea bargains of people held in prison who could not afford to defend themselves or “convictions” obtained by corrupt Democrat judges and prosecutors withholding exculpatory evidence from the trial and substituting lies for facts. With Russiagate, January 6 Insurrection, and all the rest of the orchestrated hoaxes, the Justice Department has made it clear that the US justice system is capable of actually delivering Justice.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/growing-number-of-jan-6-defendants-ask-judges-to-delay-trials-in-light-of-newly-released-footage_5104983.html?utm_source=Goodevening&src_src=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2023-03-07&src_cmp=gv-2023-03-07&utm_medium=email&est=x3AwACxmYSzWMU2Il169K%2BxTC%2FkQe18kt0t4BRdfWdI2ifnjYnvwUw%3D%3D

The tyranny that Americans face is not in Russia and China. It is in Washington. Americans have no greater enemy than “their” government whether it is Democrat or Republican. Patriotic Americans who wrap themselves in the flag are too blind to see.

– Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist and author. He formerly held a sub-cabinet office in the United States federal government as well as teaching positions at several U.S. universities. He is a promoter of supply-side economics and an opponent of recent U.S. foreign policy.

spot_img

Eating seafood high in omega-3s helps protect against kidney disease

by Zoey Sky

 

Feb. 28, 2023 – Not sure what to make for lunch? Try featuring seafood in your main dish.

According to new research conducted by an international team of scientists, eating seafood and oily fish full of omega-3 fatty acids may help lower the risk of developing kidney disease.

While plant-based foods also contain omega-3s, consuming seafood regularly was also found to help slow down declines in kidney function.

Details of the study were published in The BMJ.

Chronic kidney disease and omega-3s

According to data, at least 700 million people worldwide have chronic kidney disease (CKD), a condition that increased the risk of kidney failure and death.

The results of animal studies have linked omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) to maintaining kidney function. However, the data from human studies remain unclear.

Unlike animals, whose diets are strictly monitored, human diets differ from person to person. Additionally, there may be some human error when it comes to over- or underestimating how much of one food someone eats.

But despite limited human evidence, current nutritional guidelines recommend the consumption of a healthy amount of seafood and fatty fish.

To learn more about the link between human health, seafood consumption and omega-3s, the study authors reviewed 19 studies from 12 countries that measured n-3 PUFA biomarkers in adults and their risk of CKD.

The biomarkers included:

– Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)

– Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)

– Docosapentaenoic acid (DPA)

– Alpha linolenic acid (ALA)

EPA, DHA and DPA come from seafood but ALA is found in plants like leafy green vegetables, nuts and seeds. (Related: Curcumin found to slow chronic kidney disease progression.)

Seafood consumption linked to lower kidney disease risk

The researchers assessed the risk of chronic kidney disease by estimating the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which shows how well the kidneys eliminate waste and excess fluid from the blood. A normal eGFR is 90 to 120 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Upon examining data from 19 studies, the researchers discovered that 4,944 volunteers (19 percent) developed chronic kidney disease during an 11-year observation period.

After excluding other factors like age, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking and other health conditions, the findings revealed that seafood helped reduce the risk of kidney disease by at least eight percent.

On the other hand, omega-3s in plant-based foods were not linked to a lower risk of chronic kidney disease.

According to the scientists, the study results are only observational and they can’t directly link omega-3s in seafood to better kidney health. They added that there may be other factors connected to kidney disease that they did not consider.

“Although our findings do not prove a causal relation between seafood n-3 PUFAs and CKD risk, they are supportive and consistent with current clinical guidelines that recommend adequate intake of seafood as part of healthy dietary patterns, especially when seafood replaces the intake of less healthy foods,” concluded the study authors in a media release.

The researchers said confirming the benefits seafood offers in preventing chronic kidney disease will require more randomized clinical trials.

Tips for a kidney-friendly eating plan

If you already have kidney disease, you need to watch what you eat and drink because your kidneys cannot remove waste products as they normally should.

A kidney-friendly eating plan can help you stay healthier and slow down damage to your kidneys. These tips are for people who have Stages 1 to 4 of chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis.

Different people will have different nutrition needs. If you are not sure where to start, consult a dietitian to create a kidney-friendly eating plan that suits your dietary needs.

A kidney-friendly eating plan can help protect your kidneys from more damage. This diet will also include foods that are easy on your kidneys and limit other foods and beverages so certain minerals in those foods, like potassium, don’t build up to high levels in your body.

Your kidney-friendly eating plan may change over time, but it will always give you the right amount of these three essential nutrients:

  • Proteingives you energy. It helps your body to grow, build muscles, heal and stay healthy.
  • Fat is another nutrient that gives you energy. The human body needs fat to carry out various bodily functions, such as using vitamins from your food and keeping your body at the right temperature.
  • Carbohydrates (carbs)are your body’s main energy source. Your body can more easily convert carbs into energy compared to protein and fat.

Make sure you get the right amount and the right types of protein

Not getting enough protein can result in weak skin, hair and nails.

On the other hand, consuming too much protein can make your kidneys work harder, which can cause more damage. This happens because when the body uses protein, it produces waste products that your kidneys have to filter.

To ensure your overall health, you may need to adjust how much protein you eat.

The amount of protein you need depends on your activity level, body size and health. Check with your doctor or dietitian to see if you need to limit protein or change the type of protein you eat.

Choose the right types of fat

Fat gives you energy and helps you utilize some of the vitamins you get from your food. Fat from food is also essential for your well-being.

However, too much fat can cause weight gain and heart disease. Limit fat in your meal plan and choose healthier fats like olive oil when cooking.

Choose whole grain carbohydrates

Eating too many carbs may also cause weight gain.

When you have kidney disease, it’s better to eat whole grains and healthy carbs like fruits and vegetables. Unhealthy carbs include hard candies, honey, sugar, soda and other sugary beverages.

Eat the right amount of calories

Your body needs calories for energy. Calories come from the carbs, fat and protein in the foods you eat.

How many calories you need depends on your age, size, gender and activity level. If you need to lose weight, you may need to adjust how many calories you eat.

Some people will need to limit the calories they eat while others may need to have more calories.

Choose and prepare foods with less salt

Sodium (salt) is a mineral found in almost all foods and it has crucial roles in various bodily functions.

The amount of sodium found naturally in foods is enough to keep a healthy level in your body, but eating packaged foods and adding salt to your meals can lead to eating too much sodium.

Too much sodium can make you thirsty and make your body hold onto water, which then results in swelling and an increase in your blood pressure.

Too much sodium can cause more damage to your kidneys and make your heart work harder. If you have kidney disease, you may benefit from limiting your sodium intake.

Generally, you should consume less than 2,300 milligrams of sodium per day.

You can limit sodium by avoiding salt and using more herbs and spices to season dishes while cooking. If possible, use fresh or frozen vegetables instead of canned vegetables.

If all you have is canned vegetables, drain and rinse them to remove extra salt. When eating out, ask your server to tell the chef not to add any salt to your meal.

Follow a balanced diet and eat seafood rich in nutrients like omega-3s to boost your kidney health. Foods.news.

spot_img

Federal judge strikes down Biden’s ‘Catch and Release’ border policy

by Chief Editor

CF

 

March 8, 2023 – Today, a federal judge sided with Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, ruling that President Joe Biden is responsible for the border crisis claiming the president effectively turned the southwest border into “little more than a speedbump.”

In a scathing 100-plus-page opinion, U.S. District Judge T. Kent Wetherell ruled that Biden’s catch-and-release policy is unlawful. The judge gave the administration seven days to comply with federal immigration law.

“Today’s ruling affirms what we have known all along, President Biden is responsible for the border crisis and his unlawful immigration policies make this country less safe. A federal judge is NOW ordering Biden to follow the law, and his administration should immediately begin securing the border to protect the American people,” Attorney General Ashley Moody told The Florida Standard.

The final order from Judge Wetherell of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Florida states:

“The Court finds in favor of Florida because, as detailed below, the evidence establishes that Defendants have effectively turned the Southwest Border into a meaningless line in the sand and little more than a speedbump for aliens flooding into the country by prioritizing ‘alternatives to detention’ over actual detention and by releasing more than a million aliens into the country – on ‘parole’ or pursuant to the exercise of ‘prosecutorial discretion’ under a wholly inapplicable statute – without even initiating removal proceedings.”

Biden admin withheld evidence

The case went to trial in January and lasted a week. On day one of the trial, the Florida Attorney General’s legal team presented bombshell evidence that the federal government wrongfully withheld until just before the trial. Uncovered Department of Homeland Security emails contained information that the Biden administration’s destruction of the Trump administration’s immigration structures left the U.S. Border Patrol with no other options except to release almost all immigrants encountered.

The final order also states:

“Collectively, these actions were akin to posting a flashing ‘Come In, We’re Open’ sign on the southern border. The unprecedented ‘surge’ of aliens that started arriving at the Southwest Border almost immediately after President Biden took office and that has continued unabated over the past two years was a predictable consequence of these actions.”

And, following:

“Thus, like a child who kills his parents and then seeks pity for being an orphan, it is hard to take Defendants’ claim that they had to release more aliens into the country because of limited detention capacity seriously when they have elected not to use one of the tools provided by Congress in §1225(b)(2)(C) and they have continued to ask for less detention capacity in furtherance of their prioritization of ‘alternatives to detention’ over actual detention.”

 

spot_img

US government increases pressure on Mexico to end GM corn ban

photo: The United States is exercising its rights under the USMCA to engage in “technical consultations” with Mexico over its biotechnology policies regard genetically modified corn. In the worst-case scenario, a breakdown in talks could lead to punitive US tariffs on Mexican imports. (depositphotos.com)

 

by Mexico News Daily

 

The United States government announced Monday that it was requesting “technical consultations” with its Mexican counterpart over Mexico’s plan to phase out imports of genetically modified corn by 2024.

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) said it made the request under the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Chapter of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), the free trade pact that took effect in 2020.

“These consultations regard certain Mexican measures concerning products of agricultural biotechnology,” it said in a statement.

If the two countries fail to reach a resolution through the consultations, the United States could request the establishment of a dispute settlement panel under the USMCA.

The U.S. could place punitive tariffs on Mexican imports if no resolution is reached via a panel.

“The United States has repeatedly conveyed our serious concerns with Mexico’s biotechnology policies and the importance of adopting a science-based approach that complies with its USMCA commitments,” said U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai.

“Mexico’s policies threaten to disrupt billions of dollars in agricultural trade and they will stifle the innovation that is necessary to tackle the climate crisis and food security challenges if left unaddressed.  We hope these consultations will be productive as we continue to work with Mexico to address these issues.”

The USTR said that Mexico is a “valued trading partner and the United States is committed to working with it to resolve these biotech issues and avoid any disruption in trade in corn or other agricultural products.”

However, “if these issues are not resolved, we will consider all options, including taking formal steps to enforce U.S. rights under the USMCA,” it said.

Mexico’s Economy Ministry (SE) said in a statement that the USTR request for consultations was aimed at addressing the government’s Feb. 13 decree on genetically modified corn.

The SE noted last month that the decree – which supersedes one issued in December 2020 – clarifies that only imports of GM corn for human consumption in the form of masa (dough) and tortillas will be phased out by 2024.

It said that Mexico is self-sufficient in the production of GM-free white corn and therefore the move to phase out GM corn for human consumption doesn’t have any impact on “trade or imports.”

However, according to a Reuters report, a representative from the U.S. National Corn Growers Association (NCGA) said that corn for food use, including both yellow and white corn, makes up about 21 percent of Mexico’s corn imports from the United States. Over 90 percent of United States-grown is genetically modified, according to the U.S. government.

The SE also said in February that the new decree scraps a deadline for ending the use of GM corn for animal feed and industrial purposes, replacing it with a gradual phase-out depending on supply. In addition, the decree extended slightly – until March 2024 – the deadline for ending Mexico’s use and import of glyphosate, a controversial herbicide.

The SE said Monday that the USTR’s consultations request wasn’t “contentious” but rather aimed at “finding a solution in a cooperative way.”

“For that reason, [Economy] Minister Raquel Buenrostro Sánchez, the head of the USTR, Ambassador Katherine Tai, and their teams have been holding constructive dialogue with a view to finding solutions that provide certainty to the interested parties,” it said.

“As this ministry has pointed out on repeated occasions, the objective of the decree is to maintain the production of tortillas with native corn, ensuring the conservation of the biodiversity of more than 64 types of corn in the country, of which 59 are endemic,” the SE said.

Mexico, the SE added, will use the consultations with the United States “to prove with data and evidence that there hasn’t been a commercial impact [from the phasing out of GM corn imports] and that … the decree is consistent with [the USMCA].”

The ministry also said that Mexican authorities will seek “a mutually satisfactory solution” in their talks with their U.S. counterparts.

Mexican and U.S. officials must meet within 30 days to engage in the requested consultations.

The NCGA said last month that the proposed ban on GM corn exports to Mexico “would be catastrophic for American corn growers as well as the Mexican people, who depend on corn as a major staple of their food supply.”

The president of that association, Tom Haag, said Monday that “we are pleased USTR is taking the next step to hold Mexican officials accountable for the commitments they made under USMCA, which include accepting both biotech and non-biotech commodities.”

“Mexico’s position on biotech corn is already creating uncertainty, so we need U.S officials to move swiftly and do everything it takes to eliminate this trade barrier in the very near future,” he said.

United States Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said in a statement that his department remained “unequivocal in our stance that the science around agricultural biotechnology has been settled for decades.”

The technical consultations “represent the next step in addressing the United States’ concerns with Mexico’s biotechnology policies,” he said.

“While we appreciate the sustained, active engagement with our Mexican counterparts at all levels of government, we remain firm in our view that Mexico’s current biotechnology trajectory is not grounded in science, which is the foundation of USMCA,” Vilsack said.

“… We remain hopeful that our concerns can be fully addressed but, absent that, we will continue to pursue all necessary steps to enforce our rights under the USMCA to ensure that U.S. producers and exporters have full and fair access to the Mexican market.”

The Mexican and United States governments are already engaged in talks over the former’s nationalistic energy policies.

In July, both the U.S. and Canada requested dispute settlement consultations with Mexico, arguing that the Mexican government is violating the USMCA with policies that favor state-owned energy companies over private and foreign ones, including many that generate renewable energy.

Mexico News Daily

spot_img