Saturday, March 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 14

Decades of science highlight the diet that best protects long-term brain health

by El Reportero‘s staff

A growing stack of scientific evidence suggests that one of the most effective defenses against cognitive decline might not come from pharmaceuticals or cutting-edge technology, but from everyday food choices. An expanding body of research – strengthened by new findings presented at the American Society for Nutrition’s annual meeting – shows that what people eat in their 40s, 50s and beyond can meaningfully shape their cognitive future, sharply reducing the likelihood of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

What is emerging from decades of nutrition science is a clear, practical blueprint: the MIND diet, a nutritional approach that fuses the best elements of the Mediterranean diet with the proven heart-protective DASH plan. Unlike many popular diets that cycle in and out of public attention, the MIND diet was developed specifically with brain preservation in mind. Its structure is grounded in rigorous, long-term evidence rather than dietary fashion.

A diet engineered for the brain

Researchers emphasize that this diet’s advantages extend across racial and ethnic groups. The most recent studies followed men and women from varied backgrounds—including African American, Latino and White participants—and found that the brain-protective effects were both consistent and significant. This widened scope brings new credibility, suggesting the benefits hold true for much of the population.

The core recommendations are simple: fill the plate with leafy greens, whole grains, nuts, beans, olive oil, fish and especially berries. These foods are dense in antioxidants and compounds that help temper inflammation—two chronic processes linked to long-term neurological damage. By contrast, the diet asks followers to sharply limit foods known to promote inflammation and oxidative stress, including red meat, butter, cheese, pastries, fried food and heavily processed items.

As one nutrition expert explained, the diet’s power lies in its design. “The MIND framework intentionally targets the nutrients and food patterns most strongly tied to slower cognitive aging,” said Enoch of BrightU.AI. He noted that earlier research showed that people who adhered closely to this plan performed like individuals seven and a half years younger on cognitive tests.

Evidence measured over decades

The MIND diet’s credibility is bolstered by real-world, longitudinal evidence. In one major study published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia, researchers analyzed more than 30 years of data from over 5,000 women. Those who followed the DASH eating pattern most faithfully during midlife were 17 percent less likely to experience multiple cognitive complaints later on—complaints that often precede serious neurological disorders.

A landmark Rush University study offered even more striking results: strict adherence to the MIND diet correlated with a 53 percent reduction in Alzheimer’s risk. Even moderate adherence—far from perfect—still produced a 35 percent reduction. These findings underscore a hopeful message: meaningful benefits come not only from perfection but from consistent, incremental improvement.

Practically speaking, the diet recommends three daily servings of whole grains, a salad plus one additional vegetable each day, nuts most days, beans several times per week, poultry and berries at least twice weekly, and fish once a week. Limits are equally clear: less than a tablespoon of butter per day, cheese only sparingly, and fried or fast foods no more than once a week. Berries, especially blueberries and strawberries, stand out because of their strong clinical record in supporting brain function.

How diet shifts the brain at the genetic level

Modern research is now going beyond food patterns to investigate why this diet works. One sophisticated study examined transcriptomic data—patterns of gene activity—from autopsied brain tissue. Scientists discovered that individuals who followed the MIND diet tended to share a distinctive expression pattern across 50 key genes. This pattern aligned strongly with slower cognitive decline and reduced dementia risk.

In other words, the diet appears to do more than nourish the brain—it shapes how brain cells behave at a molecular level. This “genetic signature” provides some of the most compelling evidence yet that dietary choices can directly influence the biology underlying cognitive aging.

A proactive approach to lifelong brain health

As pharmaceutical treatments for dementia continue to yield mixed results, researchers and clinicians are increasingly turning their attention to preventive strategies rooted in lifestyle. Nutrition, it appears, is emerging as one of the most powerful tools available—accessible, affordable and within personal control.

While no diet can guarantee lifelong cognitive preservation, the scientific consensus is becoming clearer: the MIND diet offers a meaningful, evidence-based pathway to protect cognitive function well into older age. The lesson is straightforward but profound. The choices made at the dinner table today will echo through the decades ahead. And for those hoping to safeguard their mental clarity, the best time to begin may be right now.

With reports from Ava Grace, Food.news.

 

 

spot_img

ICE opened a detention center in a former California prison. Detainees are suing over conditions inside

The CoreCivic California City Immigration Processing Center in California City on Sep. 22, 2025. Photo by Miguel Vasconcellos for CalMatters -- El Centro de Procesamiento de Inmigración de California City, operado por CoreCivic, en California City el 22 de septiembre de 2025.

Immigrants in California’s newest ICE detention center allege they’re experiencing inhumane conditions and that they’re not getting access to lawyers. Until recently, the site was a state prison

by Nigel Duara and Cayla Mihalovich

CalMatters

Seven detainees at an immigration detention center in California City have sued U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, alleging the facility is polluted by sewage leaks, infested with bugs and is denying people access to food, water and their lawyers.

The lawsuit filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California also claims detainees do not have appropriate clothing for the chilly desert nights, nor appropriate medical attention for life-threatening conditions. The lawsuit alleges detainees with mobility issues don’t have access to wheelchairs, and in some cases are unable to bathe or dress themselves.

The plaintiffs are seeking to make the lawsuit a class action on behalf of all detainees housed at the California City Immigration Processing Center, which is about 75 miles east of Bakersfield and run by the private prison company CoreCivic.

“In their haste to warehouse hundreds of men and women in this isolated facility, defendants have failed to provide for the basic human needs of the people for whose lives and wellbeing they are legally responsible,” the lawsuit alleges.

ICE opened the immigration detention center at the site of a closed prison and began admitting detainees in August. On average, there were about 480 people held in the detention center each day in September, and the facility has the capability to house up to 2,560 people. The lawsuit asserts 800 people are now housed there.

A spokesperson for ICE declined to comment on the lawsuit for this story.

In September, a state disability rights group conducted a two-day inspection of the facility and found that its operators failed to distribute medication for life-threatening conditions and did not schedule timely surgeries for people that needed them.

CalMatters reported on conditions at the detention center last month. Ryan Gustin, a spokesperson for CoreCivic, in a written statement at the time said the site provides robust medical care. He said those services adhere to “standards set forth by our government partners.”

The detention center’s accelerated opening was part of the Trump administration’s plan to execute the largest deportation program in U.S. history. California City’s mayor previously told CalMattersthe federal government opened the facility without proper permits or a business license as required by state law.

“In the rush to expand capacity, ICE has cobbled together a patchwork system of county jails, private prisons, and newly converted facilities across the country. The rapid and haphazard growth of the detention system has outstripped any meaningful system of accountability or oversight,” the lawsuit alleges.

The lawsuit was filed by Prison Law Office, a nonprofit organization that focuses on conditions in California prisons; along with the American Civil Liberties Union, the advocacy group California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice and the law firm  Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP.

Conditions in immigration detention facilities have long been the subject of complaints and lawsuits. Counties in California have the option to inspect immigration detention facilities, although few do. Three of the four counties in California that host the facilities have not held inspections.

Seventeen people have died in ICE facilities this year, two in California. The agency’s official list of deaths in custody documents 15. Two subsequent deaths — one each in California and New York have not yet been added to the ICE list.

One plaintiff in the lawsuit, Yuri Alexander Roque Campos, alleged that he has been denied medication for a heart condition for days at a time. The lawsuit alleges the lack of medication led to him being hospitalized twice.

“During the last hospitalization, a doctor told Mr. Roque Campos that he could die if this were to happen again,” the lawsuit alleges. “Mr. Roque Campos has yet to see a cardiologist and still does not consistently receive his medication.”

 

spot_img

‘Last time the US came to Mexico, they took half the territory,’ Sheinbaum warns

The last time the United States came to Mexico with an intervention, they took half the territory. So, it's not that we don't want support, we do. But not with foreign troops, that's something else," the president said. (Juan Carlos Buenrostro/Presidency)-- «La última vez que Estados Unidos intervino en México, se apoderó de la mitad del territorio. Así que no es que no queramos apoyo, sí lo queremos. Pero no con tropas extranjeras, eso es otra cosa», declaró el presidente.

by Peter Davies

At her Tuesday morning press conference, President Claudia Sheinbaum responded to U.S. President Donald Trump’s latest threats of intervention in Mexico, as well as new travel advice for Mexico that was issued by the Canadian government.

Among other issues, Sheinbaum spoke about the people who remain in custody after being detained in Mexico City’s central square on Saturday for allegedly attacking police at the end of a large anti-government protest march.

Here is a recap of the president’s Nov. 18 mañanera.

Sheinbaum says — once again — that US intervention in Mexico ‘won’t happen’

Asked about Trump’s comment on Monday that launching “strikes in Mexico to stop drugs” would be “OK” with him, Sheinbaum once again declared that a U.S. military intervention in Mexico “won’t happen.”

“… I’ve said it many times,” the president noted.

“In the conversations I’ve had with President Trump, over the phone, he has … said: ‘We offer you a United States military intervention in Mexico — whatever you need to combat criminal groups.’ But I have told him every time that we can collaborate, that they can help us with any information they have, but that we operate within our own territory, and we do not accept intervention from any foreign government,” Sheinbaum said.

“I’ve told him this over the phone, and we’ve also said it to the State Department, to Marco Rubio. And they’ve understood; in fact, the agreement we have with them is one of collaboration and coordination,” she said.

Sheinbaum stressed that “respect for sovereignty” and “respect for territorial integrity” are among “the first points” of a “joint statement on security cooperation” issued in early September.

She also said that the U.S. government has acknowledged in a statement that it won’t intervene in Mexico unless her administration requests such assistance.

“And we’re not going to ask for it because we don’t want interventions from any foreign government,” Sheinbaum said.

“There is collaboration and there is coordination, but there is not subordination, nor can we allow an intervention. … The last time the United States came to Mexico with an intervention, they took half the territory. So, it’s not that we don’t want support, we do. But not with foreign troops, that’s something else,” she said.

Sheinbaum says that Revolution Day military parade will go ahead in CDMX, despite new ‘Gen Z’ march 

Sheinbaum said that the annual Revolution Day military parade will take place in Mexico City this Thursday, even though a new “Generation Z” protest march is planned for the same day in the capital.

The first “Gen Z” march in the capital last Saturday turned violent, with some protesters attacking police officers in the Zócalo, Mexico City’s main square.

Sheinbaum declared that the Revolution Day parade “will take place on Nov. 20, as it always does.”

“… We have to have respect for what the Mexican Army represents,” she said.

When a reporter suggested that there could be a clash between protesters and military personnel participating in the parade, the president dismissed such a possibility, before modifying her language and saying, “we don’t think” anything will happen.

According to a post on Sunday by the Generación Z México account on the X social media site, a protest march from the Angel of Independence Monument to the Zócalo will take place for the second time in less than a week this Thursday, starting at 11 a.m.

The same account promoted the anti-government marches against insecurity that took place last Saturday in Mexico City and other cities across the country.

Most of the participants were not members of Generation Z — people born between 1997 and 2012 — and before the protest took place, Sheinbaum accused opposition parties of infiltrating the Gen Z movement.

The president denounced the violence in the Zócalo that marred Saturday’s protest in Mexico City and left 100 police officers and 20 other people with injuries.

According to a post on Tuesday by the Generación Z México account, a protest will also be held at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) in Mexico City at 9 a.m. Thursday.

“We invite you to participate in our protest at UNAM,” reads a digital flyer. “For our people, for Generation Z.”

Sheinbaum: ‘There has to be evidence for any accusation’

A reporter noted that there is a lot of “commotion” on social media about protesters who were arrested at the end of the demonstration in Mexico City last Saturday. At least three of those people face charges of attempted murder, while 15 others face other charges, including assault of police officers.

Asked about those in custody, Sheinbaum said “there has to be evidence for any accusation” against them.

“The Mexico City Attorney General’s Office is handling the cases, and obviously, for any investigation file that is opened, there has to be evidence of the accusations,” she said.

“Yesterday we saw very disturbing images,” Sheinbaum said, referring to photos and video footage she presented of acts of violence being committed against police officers.

“The Attorney General’s Office has to show that the people who are detained really participated in an illegal act,” she added.

Sheinbaum responds to Canada’s new Mexico travel advice 

A reporter noted that the Canadian government has issued updated travel advice for Mexico, advising Canadian citizens to “avoid non-essential travel” to 14 states, with certain exceptions in each state.

Those states are Chiapas, Chihuahua, Colima, Guanajuato, Guerrero, Jalisco, Morelos, Michoacán, Nayarit, Nuevo León, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tamaulipas and Zacatecas.

Asked whether her government was aware of the new travel advice, Sheinbaum first noted that “a lot” of Canadian tourists come to Mexico. Tourism Minister Josefina Rodríguez promptly noted that Canadian tourist numbers are up 11% this year.

Sheinbaum said that her government would ask the Canadian Embassy in Mexico about the Canadian government’s new travel advice, which warns against travel to some of Mexico’s most violent states.

The president subsequently declared that official advisories against travel to certain parts of Mexico are not very effective, “because Americans, Canadians [and] Europeans continue arriving to the southeast, to the center, to the entire country.”

International tourist numbers increased 6.4% annually in the first nine months of the year to reach 34.7 million. The total number of “international visitors” — including cruise ship passengers and day trippers from the countries that border Mexico — increased 13.9% to reach 71 million between January and September.

Mexico’s top source country for tourists is the United States, which advises U.S. citizens not to travel to six Mexican states (Colima, Guerrero, Michoacán, Sinaloa, Tamaulipas and Guerrero) and to “reconsider travel” to seven others.

by Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies (peter.davies@mexiconewsdaily.com)

spot_img

El Super workers demand fair contract and immigration safeguards ahead of Thanksgiving rush

por el equipo de El Reportero

As one of the busiest grocery shopping weeks of the year approached, El Super workers across Southern California intensified their call for a fair contract, holding a large rally on Tuesday, November 25, outside an El Super store in Los Angeles. The demonstration came amid rising concerns over immigration raids in public spaces and ongoing labor negotiations that workers say have stalled for months.

Employees, supported by community leaders and immigrant-rights advocates, urged Chedraui USA—the parent company of El Super—to agree to a contract that includes living wages, safer working conditions, and clear immigration protections for workers and customers. With Thanksgiving sales surging, workers said the need for economic stability and safety inside stores has never been more urgent.

Negotiations between the company and approximately 700 unionized employees represented by United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) locals have been ongoing since April, when the previous collective bargaining agreement expired. Since then, workers say the company has rejected almost every major proposal, including requests for guaranteed protocols in the event of an immigration enforcement operation. Workers note that similar protections were included in recent agreements between other large grocery chains and their unionized workforces.

“With the wages El Super pays us, my coworkers and I struggle to put food on our own tables. Especially at Thanksgiving,” said Araceli Pinedo, a cashier at a South Los Angeles store. Pinedo explained she supports a family of four and was forced to take a second job after her hours were cut. “I stretch every dollar, use coupons, and even go to the park for free vegetables just to supplement what I can buy.”

Other workers echoed the sentiment, saying the company’s wage proposals fall far short of what is needed to survive in today’s Southern California economy. El Super’s most recent offer, union representatives say, includes hourly raises ranging from just 1 to 22 cents. Workers argue that this structure would allow wages to stagnate even as California’s minimum wage continues to increase—leaving long-time employees earning barely above the legal minimum.

“For seven months, we have been fighting for a contract that pays a living wage and protects our community,” said employee Fermin Rodríguez. He emphasized that the absence of immigration protections leaves both workers and customers vulnerable. “We want the company to establish clear security protocols for how to proceed during an immigration raid, so families feel safe to shop in the store; restrict immigration agents’ access to non-public areas; and put these protocols in our contract so they are guaranteed rights, not just empty promises.”

Concerns over immigration enforcement were shared by local leaders who joined the rally. Giovanni García, chair of the Voices Neighborhood Council, urged the company to recognize the needs of its predominantly Latino workforce. “I ask El Super to respect your workers and give them the family-sustaining wages that they deserve, and commit to including immigration protections as part of their contract agreement,” Garcia said.

Jose Ugarte, deputy chief of staff for Los Angeles City Councilmember Curren Price, said the company’s refusal to adopt basic protections threatens the wellbeing of the entire community. “Our Latino community’s economic power is immense,” Ugarte noted, adding that residents and elected leaders would continue supporting workers in their push for a contract that guarantees dignity, stability, and safety.

Workers are also seeking improvements to staffing levels, injury prevention measures, and more predictable schedules—issues they say affect both employee wellbeing and customer service. Many stores, the union argues, operate with inadequate staffing, leading to longer lines and heavier burdens on employees.

El Super is part of Chedraui USA, a subsidiary of Grupo Comercial Chedraui, Mexico’s third-largest supermarket operator. The company runs 383 stores across the United States under various brands, including Fiesta Mart, Smart & Final, and El Super, serving predominantly Latino communities in five states.

As negotiations continue, workers say they will maintain pressure through public actions and community outreach. With the holiday season underway, they hope the company will reconsider its position and work toward an agreement that reflects the economic realities faced by thousands of working families. – With reports.

 

spot_img

Did Mexico grant FIFA a full tax break for the World Cup?

Un balón gigante del Mundial de 2026 da la bienvenida a los viajeros que llegan a la entrada de la Terminal 2 del Aeropuerto Internacional de la Ciudad de México (AICM). (Andrea Murcia/Cuartoscuro)

by Mexico News Daily

Alone among the three co-hosts of the 2026 World Cup, Mexico has granted soccer’s global governing body FIFA a full tax exemption for the 40-day tournament involving 48 national teams.

The U.S. and Canada, the other co-hosts, only agreed to specified tax benefits at the national, state and local levels.

Still nearly seven months out from the inaugural match, which will be held in Mexico City’s Estadio Azteca on June 11, the concession has caused consternation.

As a result of the agreement confirmed by Mexico’s Finance Ministry (SHCP) on Monday, FIFA and any companies it designates will be exempted from paying taxes during the 2026 World Cup matches held in Mexico City, Monterrey and Guadalajara.

The stipulation has its origin in FIFA’s 2026 Revenue Law, which features transitional articles declaring that companies “participating in the organization, development and execution of activities related” to the tournament are exempt from paying taxes.

The SHCP’s proposal “releases all individuals and legal entities” covered by the Revenue Law from tax and administrative burdens.

The loss of potential tax revenue has caused a mild fuss in some corners, but politicians and tax experts have defended the accord as a good business decision.

The criticism comes from the fact that World Cup tourists buying merchandise, drinks or anything else from FIFA partner brands will not be contributing to Mexico’s tax revenues.

Additionally host countries typically suffer a financial deficit since they spend more money — investing billions in infrastructure, stadiums and preparation — than they earn, because the direct profits from ticket and marketing rights go to FIFA.

However, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has brushed aside the negative comments, pointing out that her government has worked with FIFA to limit the terms of the 10-year-deal deal that was signed in 2018 during the Enrique Peña Nieto administration.

Sheinbaum said talks with FIFA have sought to avoid a disproportionate fiscal impact and ensure that the benefits are applied only to the activities essential for the organization and celebration of the event.

“The talks with FIFA aim to establish clear limits on the tax benefits originally agreed upon, ensuring that these are applied responsibly and under the direct supervision of the Mexican State,” an SHCP official told ESPN.

Whereas Canada granted customs and tax benefits primarily on the importation of goods and the U.S. forced FIFA to negotiate with each of the 11 venues to obtain tax benefits, Mexico was at a comparative disadvantage, tax attorney Miguel Ángel Rosas told ESPN.

Rosas cited Mexico’s lack of modern infrastructure, saying: “The best way for Mexico to respond in order to host these types of events is to offer tax incentives.”

This approach could benefit Mexico over time, he said, because “this could open doors for other international events to take notice.”

Deputy Claudia Anaya concurred, saying that “connectivity between cities, highway infrastructure, logistics and maintenance of stadiums, airports, all of that” gives Canada and the U.S. a distinct advantage.

“So, yes, sometimes the one who has the least must offer the most in order to [participate],” she said.

In the end, the original agreement — which the SHCP insists will not compromise tax collection or fiscal equity between national and foreign taxpayers — resulted in Mexico being granted the right to host 13 games instead of 10.

It is estimated that 1.5 million people will visit Mexico during the World Cup, with a projected economic impact of approximately US $3 billion.

With reports from ESPN, El País, Debate and El Economista

spot_img

Venezuelan sweet Tricolor Foundation Holds Fundraiser

Dulce Tricolor Venezolano works to maintain Venezuelan cultural traditions in the Bay Area. (Courtesy: https://dulcetricolor.com/)-- Dulce Tricolor Venezolano trabaja para mantener las tradiciones culturales de Venezuela en el Área de la Bahía.

By Magdy Zara

To raise funds for the Venezuelan Sweet Tricolor Foundation, a live dance and music show will be held.

This will be an afternoon full of joy and family fun where vibrant dances, music, and traditional Venezuelan food will take center stage, all in true Venezuelan holiday style.

This colorful event is being held to raise funds and support the Venezuelan Sweet Tricolor Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to teaching and preserving Venezuelan folk dance for youth and families throughout the Bay Area.

Attendees will have the opportunity to sample a Venezuelan Christmas feast, which includes: hallaca, chicken salad, ham bread, and a beverage of their choice. Tickets range from $10 to $40 and are available at https://www.zeffy.com/…/a-latin-american-holiday

The event takes place this Saturday, November 15, starting at 11:30 AM, at 655 Magdalena Ave, Los Altos.

SFMOMA Opens Alejandro Cartagena Exhibition

The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art opens its doors to present Ground Rules, an exhibition by Alejandro Cartagena that explores themes from more than 20 series of work, including documentary images, collages, vernacular photographs, and AI-generated videos.

Cartagena is a Dominican artist who lives and works in Monterrey, Mexico, and for more than twenty years has explored social, urban, and environmental issues through portraiture and landscape photography.

The exhibition explores for the first time the themes that have been constants throughout his career, such as land use, the border between Mexico and the United States, climate change, growing economic inequality, and the effects of accelerated suburban sprawl.

The exhibition will be open to the public from November 22 of this year, starting at 2:00 PM, until April 9, 2026. The SFMOMA is located at 151 Third Street in San Francisco.

John Santos celebrates his 70th birthday with a concert. With a concert featuring a long list of renowned guest artists and his sextet, John Santos celebrates his 70th birthday.

Also known as the man of the Latin music renaissance, percussionist and composer John Santos celebrates his birthday with a magical night of Latin jazz with his telepathic sextet. Some of his special guests include vocalists Destani Wolf and Zoe Ellis, percussionist Orestes Vilató, trumpeter Skylar Tang, vibraphonist Kyle Athayde, and more.

This concert will serve as the closing event for what he describes as a challenging year. It will take place on Thanksgiving weekend, Friday, November 28, at the Miner Auditorium, located at the corner of Franklin & Fell in San Francisco, starting at 7:00 PM. Tickets can be purchased at:

https://www.sfjazz.org/…/prod…/25-26/john-santos-sextet/

spot_img

Painting stolen from Teotihuacán church returns a quarter of a century later

Los habitantes de Mazapa, pueblo situado en la zona que rodea las pirámides de Teotihuacán, celebraron la recuperación de una pintura del siglo XVIII de San Francisco de Asís, que había sido perdida durante mucho tiempo, y que volvió a su lugar en la iglesia. (Registro de Arte Perdido)

by the El Reportero‘s news services

A treasured 18th-century painting of Saint Francis of Assisi — taken in a nighttime heist from a church in México state nearly 25 years ago — has returned after years of investigation and faith-fueled waiting.

Dated Dec. 3, 1747, the oil painting was stolen from the Church of San Francisco Mazapa on Jan. 6, 2001. Eighteen works disappeared that night, but only this one has resurfaced.

The parish is in a town of 3,300 adjacent to the Teotihuacán archaeological zone, a massive UNESCO World Heritage Site that includes the Pyramid of the Sun. It’s about an hour’s drive northwest of Mexico City.

The painting stands out for many reasons, including its large, church-display size of 159 centimeters high by 101 centimeters wide (5.2 feet by 3.3 feet) — making it comparable to some of the world’s most famous single-panel gallery paintings.

Its recovery began roughly eight years ago, when the alleged owner took it to the Morton Auctions house in Mexico City and left it on consignment, said historian David Collepardo.

The piece was flagged as stolen, and reported to Interpol, after a database check with the Art Loss Register, which tracks missing art and antiques worldwide.

“We stopped the auction process,” said Collepardo, Morton’s manager of antiques and books. “The Art Loss Register filed the corresponding reports with the prosecutor’s office.”

And why did a resolution take so long? Collepardo said it was due to legal red tape.

Published reports indicate that the person who brought the stolen painting to the auction house was never reprimanded or criminally charged. Authorities attempted to contact that person, but no response was received.

The outcome is typical of sacred art thefts in Mexico, where stolen items are sold or transferred through intermediaries, but legal actions focus on recovering the artwork rather than on prosecution.

The Mexican government has an international campaign to recover Mexican artifacts that uses the slogan #MiPatrimonioNoSeVende (“My Heritage is Not for Sale”).

The returned painting shows Saint Francis of Assisi holding a skull and a crucifix, stigmata on his hands and feet, and bears a dedication to Don Gregorio Juan, an Indigenous mayor of Mazapa.

Community members said its arrival restores a lost part of their identity.

“The recovery of our painting is of inexplicable significance to the faith of local people,” said parish priest Teodoro García Romero.

The Art Loss Register confirmed on Instagram that it worked pro bono with Morton Auctions to secure the return.

Photos posted show more than 1,000 residents celebrating on Sunday as the artwork was rehung in the parish.

“It’s a reminder that stolen cultural heritage, feared lost forever, can be returned to its rightful home,” the registry wrote.

With reports from El País, Milenio and ARTnews

spot_img

CalKIDS expands opportunity for over 5 million children during National Scholarship Month

by El Reportero’s staff and reports

California is marking National Scholarship Month by celebrating the expanding reach of CalKIDS, the state’s pioneering scholarship and savings program now supporting more than five million children. Officials say the initiative is reshaping how families prepare for higher education by offering early financial support and fostering a college-going culture statewide. Launched in 2022, the California Kids Investment and Development Savings Program—CalKIDS—provides up to $1,500 in scholarships for eligible public school students and $175 for every child born in California on or after July 1, 2022. The program is administered by the ScholarShare Investment Board and chaired by State Treasurer Fiona Ma, CPA, with the goal of making higher education more accessible for families regardless of income. State figures show that more than 750,000 students have already claimed their scholarships, using the funds for tuition, books, housing, and other educational expenses at accredited colleges, universities, and vocational schools across the country. Treasurer Ma called CalKIDS a powerful tool for equity. “CalKIDS is a catalyst for building family assets and expands access to education,” she said. “For older students, it offers real financial support to meet immediate education needs. For younger families, it plants the seeds of lifelong financial literacy.” For many students, the benefits are immediate. Abigail Lopez of CSU San Bernardino said her CalKIDS scholarship reduced the stress of paying for essential school costs. “I found out about it my first year of college and wanted to use it to pay my tuition, books, and housing,” she said. “It relieved some stress I had about paying for things for school.” Parents of newborns say the program brings peace of mind. Lindsay Ferguson of Orange County described her son’s automatic scholarship as a meaningful early step toward future planning. Educators also see significant impact. Cindy Duran, a CalWORKs counselor at Saddleback College, said the automatic account creation is critical. “Most students aren’t aware of it,” she noted, adding that funds can be claimed easily online. About 60 percent of public-school students in grades 2–12 qualify for CalKIDS, along with all children born in California since mid-2022. Families can confirm eligibility by visiting CalKIDS.org and entering a student’s Statewide Student Identifier or the 13-digit number on a newborn’s birth certificate. State leaders say CalKIDS supports California’s cradle-to-career vision by encouraging savings habits and expanding access to higher education, helping ensure every child has a path toward a brighter future.

spot_img

Mainstream media continues to downplay attacks against Christians in Nigeria

After US President Donald Trump called attention to the genocide in Nigeria, the press claimed there are no mass killings there

by Jonathon Van Maren

On Saturday, the Nigerian government was caught off guard by a post on Truth Social from U.S. President Donald Trump.

“If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” he wrote. “I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action.”

Trump added, in his signature style, “I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians! WARNING: THE NIGERIAN GOVERNMENT BETTER MOVE FAST!”

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth responded beneath the post: “Yes sir.” Trump elaborated on his post Sunday, stating, “They’re killing record numbers of Christians in Nigeria. They’re killing the Christians and killing them in very large numbers. We’re not going to allow that to happen.”

Predictably, the mainstream press pivoted immediately to trotting out a claim they have been making for years: That there is no targeted mass killing of Christians in Nigeria, and that there is certainly no genocide underway. The BBC led their coverage by stating that “claims of a genocide against Nigeria’s Christians have been circulating in recent weeks and months in some right-wing U.S. circles.”

This is manifestly deceptive. Many journalists and Christian organizations have been trying to draw the world’s attention to the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria for years; I wrote a long report titled “The Slow-Motion Genocide of Nigeria’s Christians” for The European Conservative in 2021 after conducting eyewitness interviews. Some readers might also recall the mass kidnapping of Christian schoolgirls by Boko Haram, and the horrors they endured from the Islamist captors. Some are still missing.

The BBC, however, reported in their coverage of Trump’s remarks that “Groups monitoring violence say there is no evidence to suggest that Christians are being killed more than Muslims in Nigeria, which is roughly evenly divided between followers of the two religions.” This slant is unsurprising considering the fact that the BBC actually profiled one of the primary groups butchering Christians, the Fulani, in 2021 with the title: “Nigeria’s hipster herders — the funky Fulanis.” The profile only made one vague mention of the Fulani’s penchant for attacking Christians and burning churches.

In fact, a surface perusal of the reports coming out of Nigeria in the last year make it clear that, contrary to the BBC’s coverage, Christians are being systematically targeted, kidnapped, and killed. A total of 7,800 Christians were abducted as of August.

“More than 7,000 Christians had been killed in Nigeria during the first 220 days of 2025, a civil-society watchdog said,” Newsweek reported recently. “This is an average of 35 killings a day, according to the recent report published by the Nigeria-based human-rights NGO International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law (Intersociety) … The violence has displaced at least 12 million Christians since 2009, according to Intersociety. That year marked the start of Boko Haram’s insurgency to establish a caliphate in Nigeria and the broader Sahel.”

Since 2009, the group estimates that 125,000 Christians and 60,000 liberal Muslims have been killed. The claim that Christians and Muslims are being killed in “roughly even” numbers is not even remotely true — and the reason that media outlets are making the claim to begin with is to obscure the truth of what is happening on the ground. In fact, many outlets have repeatedly attributed Islamist attacks on Christians to climate change, insisting that the slaughters are primarily pastoral disputes over grazing grounds rather than religiously or ideologically motivated.

Despite that, the BBC went so far as to claim that “Trump earlier announced that he had declared Nigeria a ‘Country of Particular Concern; because of the ‘existential threat’ posed to its Christian population. He said ‘thousands’ had been killed, without providing any evidence.” The BBC could have uncovered such evidence with a very cursory online search, and I suspect they also have the capacity to conduct on-the-ground interviews. I could connect them with sources without any difficulty.

Whether or not the Trump administration decides to follow through on his threat of concrete action, his words in defense of Nigeria’s Christians have had an immediate effect. “Trump’s threat triggered alarm across Nigeria,” the BBC noted. “Many on social media urged the government to step up its fight against Islamist groups to avert a situation where foreign troops are sent into the country.” Government spokespeople hastened to assure the global press that stopping Islamist violence was of utmost concern.

“While Christians used to be vulnerable only in the Muslim-majority northern states, this violence continues to spread into the Middle Belt and even further south,” Open Doors, which monitors the persecution of Christians worldwide, observed recently. “The attacks are shockingly brutal. Many believers are killed, particularly men, while women are often kidnapped and targeted for sexual violence. More believers are killed for their faith in Nigeria than anywhere else in the world.”

“These militants also destroy homes, churches and livelihoods. More than 16.2 million Christians in sub-Saharan Africa, including high numbers from Nigeria, have been driven from their homes by violence and conflict. Millions now live in displacement camps.”

No doubt Nigerian Christians are heartened to hear that the president of the United States sees their plight, even while much of the world deliberately turns a blind eye.

 

spot_img

San Mateo breaks its own vote: The appointed sheriff and the cost to democracy

Marvin Ramírez, editor

Undersheriff Dan Perea, who by law and custom should have been the natural interim leader, was dismissed from serious consideration

by Marvin Ramírez –

November 14, 2025 – San Mateo County has crossed a line it cannot uncross. With the appointment of Ken Binder as sheriff — installed through a process controlled entirely by the Board of Supervisors — the county has replaced the will of the voters with the will of five elected officials. The Board may call the process “transparent” and “participatory,” but no amount of community forums or multilingual outreach can erase the reality: the public was invited to speak, not to choose.

This appointment does more than fill a vacancy. It rewrites the meaning of the sheriff’s office itself. In California, the sheriff is intentionally not a political appointee. The office exists outside the control of boards and mayors so that no law-enforcement chief becomes an extension of political power. That safeguard has now been breached.

Binder — a seasoned law-enforcement leader from Santa Clara County — may very well bring order, but he arrives without the mandate that gives a sheriff legitimacy: the people’s vote. The Board’s decision ensures that the county will go nearly five years without a sheriff chosen by its own residents. That is not stability. It is disenfranchisement dressed up as reform.

Supervisors congratulated themselves as they appointed Binder. They spoke of “a new spring,” “a new beginning,” and “a moment of unity.” They applauded the public forums, the questions submitted, the meetings held in multiple languages. But one truth remains unspoken: the community was never given the power to decide.

Public comment is not democracy. A multilingual website is not democracy. A forum streamed on Zoom is not democracy.

Democracy is the ballot box — and the ballot box was bypassed.

The Board emphasizes that Binder’s qualifications justify their decision. But qualifications are not the issue. Legitimacy is. Even the most qualified sheriff must derive authority from the governed, not from political appointment.

Equally concerning is the unmistakable effort to wipe clean any continuity with the prior administration. Undersheriff Dan Perea, who by law and custom should have been the natural interim leader, was dismissed from serious consideration. Now, under Binder, his future is uncertain. That exclusion reveals something deeper: a deliberate clearing of the deck, a reshuffling of power, and a restoration of the same internal alliances that Sheriff Corpus once challenged.

Independence — the cornerstone of the sheriff’s office — has been replaced with dependency. Binder begins his term tied not to the electorate but to the Board that appointed him, the same Board he will one day be expected to scrutinize or resist when circumstances demand it. That structural tension is exactly what the Constitution sought to avoid. Now, it has been locked into place.

Supporters of the process insist that the public was engaged at every step: 7,600 website visits, hundreds of questions, dozens of speakers. Yet none of it was binding. None of it replaced the power of the vote. And none of it restores the principle the Board has now severed — that the sheriff belongs to the people, not to politicians.

San Mateo County now faces a sobering reality: the shield of constitutional independence around the sheriff’s office has been pierced. A precedent has been set that future boards may use whenever an elected sheriff becomes inconvenient or politically undesirable.

This editorial is not about Ken Binder the man. It is about the method that installed him. The county’s democratic order has been weakened, not strengthened, by a process that may have been open to the eye but closed to the will of the people.

And so we pose a question that every resident of San Mateo County must confront:
If the people cannot choose their own sheriff, what other offices will soon be declared too important, too urgent, or too “crisis-ridden” to trust to voters?

This is not the restoration of faith that the Board promises. It is the quiet erosion of electoral power — the beginning of a new political norm in which democratic inconvenience justifies democratic override.

Let us be clear: The sheriff is not an administrative hire. The sheriff is the people’s guardian of justice. And when the people are denied the right to choose that guardian, something far more important than a single office is lost.

What has been wounded is not simply a process.
What has been violated is not only a tradition.
What has been ignored is not merely a vote.

What has been broken is the very foundation of local democracy.

If San Mateo County is to repair that foundation, the path is unmistakable: return the sheriff’s office to the ballot and restore the people’s authority. Public comment cannot replace public consent. And no amount of applause in the Board chambers will drown out this truth:

Democracy begins with the voter — and it dies when the voter is replaced.

 

 

spot_img