Wednesday, July 17, 2024
HomeSecond part of the lost 13th Amendment
Array

Second part of the lost 13th Amendment

­by Marvin J. Ramirez

Marvin  J. RamírezMarvin J. Ramírez

< Last week’s we published the first part of The Lost Thirteen Amendment to the Constitution. If you did not read it, I encourage you to do so by visiting www.elreporteroSF.com when it comes out. We are currently a little late in publishing our online edition.

The Thirteen Amendment deals with the prohibition to lawyers from running for public office because of their holding of a title of nobility, Esquire.

As we wrote in our first parte of this article last week, the time of its initial proposal in 1789, and again in 1810, there were 17 states in the Union. To become part of the Constitution, the 13th Amendment had to be ratified by 13 of the 17 states. It is fully accepted that ratification was achieved in 12 states.

Lisa Guliani is the author of most of this second parte to The “Lost” Thirteenth Amendment. Guliani came across some interesting documents on the missing 13th Amendment, which she relates in her own words, as follow. >

Of particular interest to me was one which refers to researcher David Dodge, who found a book in the Library of Congress Law Library which he discovered in the rare book section, titled “2 VA Law,” which is un-catalogued. The volume “reveals a plan to overthrow the constitutional government by secret agreements engineered by lawyers.”

As Dodge puts it, “There is no public record that this book even exists.” What??

Secret scheming by lawyers? Imagine that. Sound farfetched to you? It sounds right on the “money” to me. Throughout our history, bankers and lawyers have worked in conjunction to rule the world and destroy the United States. They almost succeeded a few times, and now look who’s at it again… Take the Depression of the 1930’s, for example, which was a classic case of illicit banking practices that impacted hard working members of society in extreme ways over an extended period of time. Ask any elderly person to tell you about the Great Depression.

If they can recall the past, they will surely provide explicit information about the harrowing days of that period. In current times, politicians, lawyers, bankers, and governmental agencies work together like some malignant tumor raging through the nation – further contaminating an already infected system, spreading more political and economic disease throughout the Machine and the country. Who suffers? We all do – everybody that is, except for the bankers and the lawyers, who always seem to float to the top of the cesspool.

The 13th Amendment is also called the “Title of Nobility” Amendment because it refers to the word “Esquire,” which was (and still is) used by attorneys behind their names.

The word comes from the English.

Back in the old days, the allegiance of “Esquire” lawyers was called into question by our forefathers. Why? Because they couldn’t be trusted as far as you could throw them.

An attorney with a title behind his name was deemed loyal to the monarchy in those days – therefore, our ancestors wanted to prohibit any person bearing such a title or those receiving “honors” (exemptions the rest of the citizenry are not privy to) from holding public office. I think it’s safe to say that people in general regard lawyers warily to this very day, with good cause. Why? Because things haven’t changed a whole helluva lot. They just leave a bad taste in your mouth… The reasoning behind the proposal of the 13th Amendment was so that those persons (lawyers) in political power positions could not dictate or influence public policy by using their skills to destroy or subvert the government. In fact, the 13th Amendment makes it very clear that any person within the ranks of government holding public office, found to have a title of nobility or to be accepting ­“honors” must lose his position and FORFEIT HIS CITIZENSHIP to the United States. Wow!! This is a serious penalty! Our Founding Fathers considered “titles of nobility” a great threat to the continuity of the Republic, and so this penalty was added to the amendment to get the point across that such titles would not be tolerated in American government.

The 13th Amendment was put into place to protect the People from corrupt, dishonest lawmakers. (What happened along the way?) At the time of its proposal in 1789, and thereafter, there were forces opposed to its ratification. Gee, does this come as any surprise? We know who they were – and are.

THEY were and are the Controllers and their henchmen – and THEY will tell you that this amendment was never ratified. However, there is evidence to suggest that this is just another lie among a dung-heap of lies we have been fed. THEY blow a lot of smoke up the ole chimney, don’t they?

We will continue next time, with: The Reasoning behind the proposal of the 13th Amendment.

RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -spot_img
- Advertisment -spot_img