Monday, July 27, 2026
Home Blog Page 69

Canelo’s Saudi Gold Rush: Mikey Garcia on Alvarez’s $400M Goal, Titles, Crawford

by Tim Compton

Mikey Garcia says Canelo Alvarez is going to make $400 million soon and double his net worth as he heads into his May 3rd undisputed super middleweight championship bout against William Scull in Riyadh, and then Terence Crawford in September.

Garcia feels that Canelo (62-2-2, 39 KOs) has achieved it all, doesn’t care about titles anymore, and is only fighting for money. The only reason Alvarez is facing IBF super middleweight champion William Scull is that the Saudis want the undisputed championship to be on the line for the Crawford fight when he faces him.

Canelo’s $400 Million Goal

“He’s going to make $400 million. You know, he’s worth $200 million right now, maybe more. Maybe $300 million. Those extra $200 million will set you up for an even bigger life in the next years, not just for himself but for his generation. That’s what keeps him motivated,” said Mikey Garcia to Little Giant Boxing about Canelo Alvarez.

“He can do whatever he wants with his $300 million right now. That extra $200 million or $400 million he’s going to make is going to set up his generations. It’s going to set up his grandkids. So, that’s why he’s doing it. He doesn’t care about the titles any more. He cares about the money. He already accomplished everything. It’s not about the title no more. It’s about the money.”

If Canelo re-ups with Riyadh Season for a new contract when his current one expires, he’s got an excellent chance of increasing his net worth to $400 million. He would have to take much riskier fights than 38-year-old Terence Crawford to make that kind of money, though. The Saudis would likely want Alvarez to run the gauntlet through these fighters to get him to a half billion in net worth: – Dmitry Bivol – Artur Beterbiev – David Benavidez.

spot_img

MACLA Holds Its 4th Latin Art Exhibition

by Magdy Zara

The Latin American Art and Culture Movement’s annual auction exhibition has been scheduled, and it showcases the best of contemporary Latinx art from the Bay Area.

Featuring more than 30 artists with works ranging from sculptures and paintings to mixed media, the exhibition celebrates the diversity of Latinx art and culture and reflects current themes and perspectives.

The exhibition culminates with a live art auction, one of Macla’s signature charity events.

The exhibition will feature works by: Abby Aceves, Stephanie Baraja, Jesus Barraza, Irene Berrones Kolb, Ruby Bloo, Athena Calvillo, Irene Carvajal, Melanie Cervantes, Houyee Chow Jimenez, Arleene Correa Valencia, Yvonne Escalante.

You can experience the best of contemporary Latin art from the Bay Area, free of charge, at the Macla gallery located at 510 South 1st Street, San Jose, during gallery hours: Wednesday through Friday, 12 p.m. to 7 p.m.

Latin Jazz with Mission Varrio Project

Experience a free pizza and wine tasting set to the best Latin jazz in the Bay Area by the Cuban musical group Mission Varrio Project.

This will be a fabulous afternoon of food, wine, and music by the trio MVP, who will delight you with traditional Cuban Latin jazz, funk, rap, and raggae. Kai Lyons will play guitar, Kike Maniano will play piano, and Marcus López will sing and play bass.

This MVP performance will be this Saturday, April 5, starting at 3 p.m. at Estatuas Silvestry, located at 2629 Bayshore Blvd. in San Francisco.

Cirque du Soleil’s Big Top Returns to San Jose

Cirque du Soleil returns to San Jose, this time to premiere ECHO, a show driven by the power of change, the hope of youth, and the value of empathy. ECHO follows an inquisitive young woman named FUTURE as she delves into a fantasy world that explores our sacred bond with animals and nature.

Cirque du Soleil’s 20th Big Top show brings bold new visuals and a unique aesthetic to its run. ECHO invites audiences on a journey through a universe of color, wonder, and endless possibilities.

The show is Thursday, April 10, in the Big Top at the Santa Clara County Fairgrounds, starting at 7:30 p.m.

La Mezcla Celebrates Its Anniversary with a Concert

La Mezcla celebrates its 10th anniversary with two performances, commemorating its history of music, resilience, and community.

Teatro Brava is proud to present Concierto La Mezcla. Following a tour of the United States and Mexico, this will be the first full-length concert in the country.

The concert will take place at Teatro Brava, located at 2781 24th St, San Francisco, on Saturday, April 12 at 7 p.m., and on Sunday, April 13 at 4 p.m.

spot_img

The history of the pre-columbian era in Central America: A journey to its civilizations and deities

by the El Reportero‘s staff

The Central American region, made up of countries such as Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama, was home to various pre-Columbian civilizations that flourished thousands of years before the arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492. These cultures, although sharing certain similarities, also had unique characteristics that distinguished them, such as their religions, customs, social organization, and scientific advancements. Among the most notable are the Mayan, Olmec, and Mesoamerican civilizations, which left a profound legacy in both their architecture and worldview.

The Mayan civilization

The Mayans occupied a large part of what are now Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, and El Salvador. Their civilization reached its peak between 250 and 900 AD, although their influence lasted for centuries longer. The Maya are known for their advanced knowledge of astronomy, mathematics, and architecture, developing a hieroglyphic writing system, an accurate calendar, and monumental pyramids.

Religiously, the Maya had a pantheon of deities associated with the natural elements. One of the most important gods was Itzamná, the creator of the world, associated with the sun and wisdom. Chac, the rain god, was worshipped to ensure harvests. Furthermore, the Maya believed in a cosmic cycle, where life and death were interdependent. Ceremonies of human sacrifice, although controversial, were part of their religious practices, especially to honor the gods and ensure prosperity.

The Olmecs and their influence

The Olmecs, considered the “mother culture” of Mesoamerica, flourished between 1200 and 400 BC in what is now southern Veracruz and Tabasco, Mexico, although their influence reached Guatemala. This civilization left a fundamental legacy, especially in terms of architecture, with its colossal stone heads, and the creation of the first forms of writing and calendar.

In terms of religion, the Olmecs worshipped a series of deities related to nature and the elements. The most prominent figure in their pantheon was the Jaguar, considered a sacred being. They also had a relationship with water, and the god of corn was of great importance. The connection between corn and fertility was reflected in their agricultural and worship rituals.

The cultures of Nicaragua and Costa Rica

In Nicaragua and Costa Rica, pre-Columbian civilizations also developed advanced cultures, albeit with particular characteristics. In Nicaragua, peoples such as the Chorotegas and the Nicaraos were noted for their ceramic work, the hierarchical organization of their societies, and the worship of deities linked to agriculture, such as the god of corn.

In Costa Rica, peoples like the Diquí left an important legacy of stone sculptures, known as stone spheres, which remain a mystery to archaeologists today. Their worldview was centered on the worship of the natural elements, with a strong connection to the earth and the agricultural cycle. Gods associated with rain and the sun were central to their mythology.

Religious worldview and the deification of natural elements

Throughout Central America, deities were closely linked to the natural elements. The sun, the moon, water, and corn were central to the spirituality of pre-Columbian peoples. Corn, in particular, was seen as a symbol of life and rebirth. Many peoples had creation myths in which the gods created humans from corn, symbolizing the profound relationship between humans and the earth.

In short, the history of the pre-Columbian era in Central America is marked by the splendor of civilizations that achieved great advances in architecture, science, and religion. Their deities, many of which were representations of natural elements, reflect the importance of nature in their worldview. The influence of these cultures lives on in the region and continues to be an essential component of the identity of the Central American peoples.

spot_img

Bishop Strickland publishes open letter to Trump on war in the Middle East

‘If America desires to be a force for good in the world, it must act not with unchecked military aggression, but with justice, prudence, and a sincere pursuit of peace,’ Bishop Strickland urged President Trump

by Bishop Joseph E. Strickland

In the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, I write to you as a successor to the Apostles, compelled by my duty to speak the truth in charity and justice. The worsening crisis in the Middle East, from the war in Gaza to the growing regional conflicts – including U.S. military actions in Yemen – demands urgent moral reflection. As a shepherd of souls, I cannot remain silent while thousands suffer the consequences of escalating violence.

The Catholic Church upholds the sacred dignity of every human life, made in the image of God. The Catechism teaches us that “actions deliberately contrary to the law of nations and to its universal principles are crimes” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2313). This applies to all parties engaged in warfare, whether nations, militant groups, or coalitions. While a nation has the right to defend itself and protect its people, such actions must remain within the bounds of justice, proportionality, and moral law.

In Gaza, the indiscriminate killing of civilians – including women and children – has reached an intolerable scale. The people of Palestine, many of whom have no affiliation with terrorist organizations, suffer immensely. War cannot be waged without regard for the innocent. The same applies to Yemen, where U.S. military actions against the Houthis risk inflaming an already volatile situation. Each missile launched, each bomb dropped, threatens to push the region further into chaos, with untold humanitarian consequences.

The principle of just war is clear: war must be a last resort, waged only in defense, with proportional force, and never targeting civilians. It must aim not at conquest or retaliation but at restoring a just peace. Pope Pius XII warned that war often “creates more serious evils than it eliminates.” Today, as conflicts multiply across the Middle East, I fear we are seeing this tragic truth unfold before our eyes.

I urge this administration to reconsider its path. If America desires to be a force for good in the world, it must act not with unchecked military aggression, but with justice, prudence, and a sincere pursuit of peace. A nation cannot claim the moral high ground while contributing to the escalation of human suffering. I call upon you to seek diplomatic solutions, to demand an immediate end to the destruction in Gaza, and to approach the crisis in Yemen with restraint, lest the fires of war consume even more innocent lives.

The United States has long been shaped by Christian principles, yet it stands at a crossroads. Will it choose the path of justice and peace, or will it allow the cycle of violence to continue unchecked? I pray that our leaders will seek the wisdom of Christ, the Prince of Peace, and work toward a just resolution that respects the dignity of all peoples.

Respectfully in Christ,

Bishop Joseph E. Strickland

Bishop Emeritus

 

spot_img

US Strikes at Sinaloa Cartel’s Financial Structure

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accuses the criminal group of trafficking fentanyl and other lethal drugs from Mexico to the US.

by the El Reportero‘s staff

The US Treasury Department sanctioned and blocked the assets of individuals and companies on Monday allegedly involved in a money laundering network serving the Sinaloa Cartel, one of the most violent and powerful drug trafficking organizations in the world, recently designated a “Foreign Terrorist Organization” by the Trump administration. With this designation, the US government toughens its stance against the cartel, allowing for more severe sanctions and expanding cooperation with international agencies to combat its financial and logistical operations. In a statement, it was reported that the measure was carried out by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), in collaboration with the Government of Mexico and its Financial Intelligence Unit, as well as the Attorney General’s Office for the Southern District of California, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the FBI, among other US agencies. These actions are part of a broader strategy to stem the flow of illicit money that fuels organized crime operations in both countries.

“Drug trafficking proceeds finance the Sinaloa Cartel’s narco-terrorist activity and are only possible thanks to financial operators like those sanctioned today,” stated Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. The report also attributes to the criminal group a large portion of the illicit fentanyl and other lethal substances reaching the US, exacerbating the opioid crisis that has devastated entire communities in recent years. The US government has reiterated on multiple occasions that combating this illegal trafficking is a national security priority. Among those sanctioned are six individuals: Alberto David Benguiat Jiménez, Christian Noé Amador Valenzuela, Israel Daniel Páez Vargas, Salvador Díaz Rodríguez, Enrique Dann Esparragoza Rosas, and Alan Viramontes Sesteaga. They allegedly operate in Mexicali, Culiacán, and California, participating in extortion schemes and managing front companies to launder illicit proceeds. These individuals have been identified as key players in the cartel’s financial infrastructure, facilitating the conversion of enormous sums of money into seemingly legitimate assets that are then reinvested in the expansion of its criminal activities.

Likewise, seven companies used for money laundering were identified: Grupo Unter Empresarial, Grupo Vindende, Grupo Zipfel de México, Productions Pipo, Personas Unidas Hoas, Scatman & Hatman Corp, and Tapgas México. According to OFAC, these companies have been used to hide and move money derived from drug trafficking, employing complex international transaction networks to avoid detection by authorities. With these sanctions, the US freezes the assets and property of the aforementioned individuals and companies, even if they are controlled by US citizens. Similarly, any entity in which those implicated own a 50 percent or more stake will be subject to the measure, unless OFAC grants a specific license or exemption. These restrictions significantly hamper the cartel’s access to global financial systems, limiting its ability to move money and continue expanding its illicit operations.

“Today’s action is part of a government strategy to counter the illicit drug crisis in the US, which causes more than 100,000 deaths annually and an untold number of non-fatal overdoses,” the Treasury added. US officials have insisted that this crisis not only represents a public health problem, but also a threat to the country’s social and economic stability. In this context, the Government seeks to strengthen cooperation with Mexico and other nations to dismantle these criminal networks and prevent them from continuing to operate with impunity. With reports by RT.

 

spot_img

Prison-based program in CA aims to interrupt cycle of violence

by Ricky Rodas for Yes! Magazine.

When Cecilia González told family members she had volunteered to share her life story with men in prison, they were shocked.

González, 56, had spent most of her adult life recovering from the pain and trauma of childhood abuse and domestic violence. She has a loving family and a stable marriage of 25 years. Her family couldn’t understand why she would want to talk to the kind of person she’d spent her life trying to escape.

But for González, sharing her story was a way to bring her healing journey full circle. After years of perseverance, she’d established herself as a community services manager for House of Ruth, a nonprofit organization based in Pomona, California. Every day, she helps survivors wrestle with similar challenges to the ones she’s faced.

When she received an invitation to speak at the California Institution for Men, a prison in the city of Chino, California, in August, she saw a new opportunity to help interrupt the cycle of domestic and sexual violence: talking directly with people who have caused harm.

“I know that change is possible,” González says. “It’s good when somebody is able to tell you that a life without violence and any type of abuse in the home is possible.”

The panel was organized by a program called the Victim Offender Education Group. Founded by Insight Prison Project, the program provides rehabilitation activities for men at the California Institution for Men. The curriculum is grounded in principles of restorative justice, commonly defined as an alternative to punitive justice that promotes healing for the person who was harmed, the person who carried out the harm, and the communities they both belong to.

Although the group was not created specifically for people involved in domestic violence and intimate partner violence, it has increasingly focused on serving this population as it became clear that many program participants had committed these types of crimes, said Rev. Nora Jacob, a minister at Covina Community Church and program lead in restorative justice at the prison.

Jacob has been organizing education groups in prison settings since 2014 and has facilitated the rehabilitation of several cohorts of men who have committed a variety of crimes, including domestic violence and intimate partner violence. A two-hour session is held once per week and consists of a mix of readings and empathy-building exercises. Participants spend time sharing and self-reflecting on the decisions and circumstances that led to their incarceration.

“People come out changed,” Jacob says. At the introductory meeting, she tells participants: “We are asking you to share as much as you’re willing to share, and we are going to ask about everything.”

Reconciling with hurt is something that Jacob has had to do in her own life. As a child growing up in upstate New York, she was sexually abused. “What I’d been told about God—that a creator was real, that God had not seen or heard me when I cried out” she could no longer believe, she says. “So I rejected any kind of organized religion for a long time.”

Decades passed, and Jacob found herself married and living in Orange County, California. She then faced a crisis when her husband of 19 years suddenly passed away from a brain aneurysm. “One night I was contemplating suicide and called out to God—I didn’t believe in God—and had a feeling of the Holy Spirit coming over and reassuring me.”

Jacob, a library services director at the time, joined the Disciples of Christ denomination church in her county. She eventually enrolled in Claremont School of Theology where she spent time with social justice activists. After graduating, Jacob trained at Insight Prison Project in the Bay Area to be a restorative justice facilitator and eventually secured her current position at the California Institution for Men.

“I’m committed to restorative justice,” Jacob says. “I live differently because of restorative justice, and anything that can do that [kind of transformation] for a person I think is worth the pursuit.”

Restorative justice started gaining momentum among grassroots organizations in the 1970s, but it is not a new practice, as its roots are in Indigenous customs, such as talking circles. Restorative justice has grown in popularity for its potential to reduce recidivism, which is the likelihood that a previously incarcerated person will re-offend for the same crime. That’s what Jacob has seen among the men her program works with. Incarcerated individuals who take part in rehabilitative programs are less likely to reoffend than their counterparts who don’t, according to data compiled by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

The costs of violence

Domestic violence refers to any type of physical, sexual, or emotional abuse inflicted on a person by their partner, family member, or cohabitant. Intimate partner violence is similar, but refers specifically to violence from a partner, spouse, or ex-partner. These crimes don’t just affect the victims and their families; they also have huge financial implications for society at large.

Intimate partner violence against women costs California $73.7 billion in health care, lost earnings, criminal justice expenses, and survivor support, which accounted for 2 percent of California’s gross domestic product in 2022 alone, according to a joint study by UC San Diego and Tulane University. The study, which primarily uses data compiled from the California Violence Experiences Survey, measures both the tangible and intangible costs of intimate partner violence. The study also draws on data from other sources, including the U.S. Department of Justice, the state budget, health care providers, the Centers for Disease Control, and many others.

Jakana Thomas, PhD, an associate professor at UC San Diego and principal investigator for the survey, said that while the price tag might be high, it only represents a fraction of these crimes’ negative impacts because of gaps in data collection.

Thomas gave some examples, such as lack of data quantifying the amount of time police spend investigating intimate partner violence, or more specific data regarding health care costs and the impact on survivors’ quality of life. “ This is not just costing taxpayers,” Thomas says. “It costs the people who have to deal with that violence quite dearly, both financially and in intangible ways.”

Breaking cycles of abuse

For the panel event, González and other nonprofit advocates were paired with an education group member and filled the role of a surrogate survivor, someone who could tell their member how it felt to be the victim of domestic or intimate partner violence. The exercise represented the culmination of the members’ education and was meant to gauge whether each man could feel empathy for their surrogate survivor and remorse for the immense hurt they had caused others.

For the surrogate survivors, sharing their stories is potentially a cathartic experience, said Melissa Pitts, the chief program officer for House of Ruth, who also served on the panel. That’s because many survivors have never had the opportunity to address the people who caused them harm.

That’s what convinced González to participate in the panel. She said she was initially skeptical of the idea. “Then I thought about it and [realized] I’ve never been able to face any of my attackers and let someone know exactly how I felt,” González says.

Pitts said that organizations like House of Ruth are increasingly interested in restorative justice practices, while remaining survivor centered. One motivation, she said, is that domestic violence is widespread, but carceral solutions typically don’t get to the root of the problem. For example, many people who cause harm are replicating abusive patterns they learned in childhood, she explained.

The need is widespread. “If you go to the prison system, a corrections officer will tell you 90 percent of their caseload has experienced domestic violence growing up in the home,” Pitts says. “And then you can go to an affluent community with lots of monetary resources, and they are experiencing domestic violence.”

One former education group participant at the California Institution for Men, who requested anonymity because of safety concerns, believes the harm he committed stems back to his traumatic adolescence. The participant was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison for a domestic-violence-related murder.

The man said he grew up in a household where violence was commonplace. Years of neglect and abuse carried out by his father, mother, and other adults in his life pushed him toward drugs and gangs, he said. The violence also distorted how he viewed relationships. “The way that my mom, father, and stepfather talked about women led me to believe that you couldn’t trust women, and I carried that into my relationships,” he says.

Once incarcerated at the California Institution for Men, the man began to meet other people in rehabilitation classes who had faced similar struggles. After connecting with Jacob and other advocates affiliated with the Victim Offender Education Group, he decided to apply. He spent the next few years in group restorative justice circles unpacking his pain and learning to accept responsibility for the violence he inflicted upon women and others.

The man said his life-changing moment came when, after years of therapy and reflection, he took part in a surrogate survivor panel. “Hearing the raw emotions coming out of someone that had been a victim of a similar crime, it stirred up something in me which I had never felt, which was empathy,” he says. “I really started to realize the harm that I caused. Before, I always felt that no one cared about me, so why should I care about anybody?”

The participant was paroled over a year ago and is now involved in restorative justice advocacy, speaking to youth in juvenile hall. He also visits the California Institution of Men to share his story with those who are incarcerated. For him, being able to feel guilt and remorse for his past actions has been the key to genuinely turning his life around.

“For me, genuine change is remorse,” he says. “It changes who you are, so you don’t … continue to harm people.”

For González, participating in the panel didn’t go as well as she’d hoped. She said she left the event feeling like the incarcerated person she’d spoken with had more work to do, a sentiment she shared with Jacob afterward.

“The reaction I got from this individual wasn’t what I was expecting, so I walked out of there feeling a little confused,” she says. “I thought I was going to see the remorse. My expectation was to see something visual.”

Instead, the man didn’t say much and, according to her, didn’t appear to show empathy. Still, González said she believes in the program’s mission and thinks the person she talked to can benefit from it.

“Even with the harm he’s caused, I feel he deserves to have somebody continue to teach him, whatever needs to be done for him to come to terms with how he has caused harm,” González says.

She also walked away feeling proud of the progress she’d made to date.

“The biggest thing I took [away] is that change is so powerful,” she says. “Even as a victim, it’s possible to become 100 percent a survivor and have full control.”

spot_img

Mexico bans junk food in schools, U.S. keeps feeding kids unhealthy meals

by the El Reportero‘s staff

Starting this week, Mexico has enacted a significant public health law, banning junk food sales in all public and private schools across the nation. This move is a cornerstone of the government’s strategy to combat escalating rates of childhood obesity and diabetes, declared a health emergency by UNICEF. The initiative starkly contrasts with the situation in the United States, where unhealthy food options remain prevalent in schools despite similar health concerns.

The ban, overseen by the Ministries of Education and Health under the “Healthy Living” program, prohibits schools from selling food and drinks marked with black warning labels. These labels, introduced in 2020, identify products with excessive amounts of sugar, salt, fat, or calories. These prominent octagonal labels aim to quickly inform consumers about potentially unhealthy nutritional content, empowering healthier choices at the point of purchase, a standard now extended to school environments. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has championed the ban, emphasizing that simple, nutritious foods like bean tacos are preferable to processed snacks like chips or sodas. Consequently, popular items such as donuts, hamburgers, French fries, flavored milk, and candy are now barred. Schools are mandated to offer healthier alternatives, including fresh fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes, and lean proteins like eggs, cottage cheese, and chicken.

This decisive action responds directly to Mexico’s alarming health statistics. The National Health and Nutrition Survey indicates that 37 percent of children aged 5 to 11 are obese. Mexico leads Latin America in consuming sugary drinks and ultra-processed foods, which constitute roughly 40 percent of daily calories for preschoolers. This high consumption pattern is strongly linked not only to obesity but also to the early onset of chronic conditions like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular problems, straining the healthcare system. These figures underscore the urgency behind the government’s intervention to foster healthier eating habits from a young age.

However, implementing this nationwide policy presents considerable challenges. Mexico has previously struggled with enforcing similar regulations, particularly given the logistical hurdles. Many of the country’s 255,000 schools, especially those in underserved areas, lack basic infrastructure like reliable water access or electricity, making compliance and the provision of fresh alternatives difficult. School administrators are responsible for reporting violations, but effective government monitoring across such a vast and diverse educational system remains a concern. Furthermore, regulating informal vendors often situated just outside school gates, who offer many of the banned items, presents an additional enforcement hurdle. Despite these obstacles, the government is hopeful the ban will positively impact the long-term health of Mexican children.

U.S. school nutrition lags behind

While Mexico prioritizes child health through legislative action, the United States has not adopted comparable measures. Junk food, including sugary drinks, greasy snacks, and highly processed meals, continues to be readily available in many U.S. school cafeterias and vending machines. Options frequently include pizza, burgers, chicken nuggets, sugary cereals, and vending machines stocked with candy and chips, often displacing healthier choices. This raises the question of why a developing nation like Mexico is implementing progressive health reforms that the U.S., with far greater resources, has yet to embrace.

The U.S. faces its own significant childhood obesity epidemic, affecting nearly 20 percent of children and adolescents. Public health advocates have long campaigned for stricter school nutrition standards and reduced access to unhealthy foods and beverages. Mexico’s bold policy serves as a potential wake-up call, demonstrating a commitment to prioritizing children’s well-being over potential pushback.

Critics argue the U.S. continues to allow corporate interests to heavily influence school food environments, hindering meaningful reform. Instead of contributing to the obesity crisis, the U.S. could learn from Mexico’s example by implementing stricter nutritional guidelines, investing in healthier meal programs, reducing the availability of processed foods, and enhancing nutrition education. Adopting stricter standards is not merely about addressing obesity statistics; it’s an investment in cognitive development, academic performance, and reducing future healthcare costs. If Mexico can take these crucial steps, the United States arguably possesses the capacity and resources to do the same, safeguarding the health of its future generations.

spot_img

The US Education Department investigates Cal State San Bernardino as Trump dismantles the agency

 -- The CSU San Bernardino campus on April 22, 2024. El campus de la CSU San Bernardino el 22 de abril de 2024.

Cal State San Bernardino is among several dozen universities under federal scrutiny for programs that have targeted disadvantaged groups of students

by Deborah Brennan

Cal State San Bernardino is one of more than 50 universities under investigation by the U.S. Department of Education, even as President Donald Trump attempts to unravel the department.

A statement from the department’s Office for Civil Rights listed three California campuses — Cal State San Bernardino, Cal Poly Humboldt and UC Berkeley — among universities it says violated Title VI of the education code. That’s the section of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that prohibits organizations that get federal funds from discriminating based on race, color or national origin.

The investigations aim to “ensure universities are not discriminating against their students based on race and race stereotypes,” U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in the statement.

The Cal State University system is reviewing the claim and will cooperate in the investigation, said Amy Bentley-Smith, a Cal State spokesperson said in a statement.

“The CSU continues to comply with longstanding applicable federal and state laws and CSU policies and does not discriminate or provide preferences on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity or national origin,” she said.

A UC Berkeley official said the campus also is responding to the federal investigation.

“UC Berkeley has an unwavering commitment to having a campus free of discrimination,” Assistant Vice Chancellor Dan Mogulof said in a statement.

The Department of Education claims the three California universities violated civil rights laws by partnering with The PhD Project, which it describes as “an organization that purports to provide doctoral students with insights into obtaining a Ph.D and networking opportunities, but limits eligibility based on the race of participants.”

The PhD Project describes its mission as developing business school faculty and said this year it’s open to all applicants.

“Our vision is to create a broader talent pipeline of current and future business leaders who are committed to excellence and to each other, through networking, mentorship, and unique events,” it said in a statement . “This year, we have opened our membership application to anyone who shares that vision.”

Ahlam Muhtaseb, a professor of media studies at Cal State San Bernardino, said the federal complaint doesn’t make sense, because the university doesn’t offer a doctorate in business. It does offer a doctorate in educational leadership, and Muhtaseb believes that’s what the Department of Education is targeting.

“It’s frivolous because they are saying that we are infringing on the rights of white students because we have admitted 90% students of color,” into the educational leadership program, she said. “That is a ridiculous allegation because we are a Hispanic-serving institution.”

About 70% of students at Cal State San Bernardino are Latino, 10% are White, 6% are Asian and 5% are Black.

“So this is natural that this is the community that we serve,” Muhtaseb said.

The investigation, she said, “has a chilling impact. I see it as an attack on our marginalized communities.

It’s not clear how the Department of Education will conduct the investigation, however, because the Trump Administration is trying to eliminate the department.

On March 11, the department announced it was cutting its own staff by half. On March 14 it announced it would investigate the universities for alleged civil rights violations. Last Friday Trump issued an executive order to dismantle the department.

The Department of Education did not respond to an email from CalMatters, and the phone line for its press information office had an automated message stating that it was temporarily closed.

On Monday, a coalition of advocacy groups and state leaders, including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, sued to block the elimination of the department and the mass firing of its employees, arguing it would impair the administration of student loans, disability services and other functions.

They pointed out that Congress created the department and has sole authority to close it.

Faculty at campuses targeted by the investigation said it has already lost its original purpose.

“The Department of Education has been more or less dismantled in terms of its civil rights and student aid, but has now been turned against the institutions it was designed to support,” said Ryder Dschida, a history professor at Cal Poly Humboldt.

spot_img

Preparing Financially for Future Emergencies: Building Resilience and Readiness

A student sitting in a public library using his calculator to work out a math problem.

Sponsored by JPMorganChase

In an unpredictable world, financial emergencies can arise at any moment, whether due to unexpected medical expenses, job loss, or natural disasters. The Southern California Wildfires have underscored the importance of being financially prepared for such unforeseen events. Building financial resilience is not just about having a safety net; it’s about cultivating habits and strategies that help ensure stability and peace of mind in the face of uncertainty.

Here are some practical tips to help you prepare financially for future emergencies, empowering you to navigate life’s challenges with confidence:

  1. Create an Emergency Fund: Start by saving leftover money each month, gradually building up to cover three to six months’ worth of living expenses. You can set up automatic transfers from your checking to your savings account  to ensure consistent contributions without having to think about it. By storing your emergency fund in a high-yield savings account or money market account, it can earn interest yet still remain easily accessible.
  2. Budget Wisely: Use budgeting apps or spreadsheets to monitor your expenses and identify areas where you can potentially cut back. Also be sure to prioritize needs over wants by focusing on essential expenses and reduce discretionary spending to help free up more money for savings. Revisit your budget periodically to accommodate changes in income or expenses and ensure you’re on track.
  3. Manage Debt Effectively: Focus on paying off high-interest debt, such as credit card balances, and explore options to consolidate or refinance loans at lower interest rates to save money and simplify payments. Be cautious about taking on new debt, especially for non-essential purchases, to maintain financial flexibility.
  4. Protect Your Assets: Ensure you have adequate health, home, auto, and life insurance to protect against unexpected expenses and keep important financial documents, such as wills and insurance policies, in a secure location.
  5. Plan for the Long Term: Contribute regularly to retirement accounts, such as a 401(k) or IRA, to help secure your financial future and consult with a J.P. Morgan advisor to develop a comprehensive financial plan tailored to your needs.

Adjusting to a budget takes time, as it’s about finding the right balance between spending and saving. By implementing these tips, you can help build a solid foundation to withstand future emergencies and enhance your financial security. Regularly reviewing your budget against your actual expenses allows you to refine and optimize your financial strategy.

For more information, visit chase.com/financialgoals

INVESTMENT AND INSURANCE PRODUCTS ARE:

• NOT FDIC INSURED • NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY • NOT A DEPOSIT OR

OTHER OBLIGATION OF, OR GUARANTEED BY, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES

• SUBJECT TO INVESTMENT RISKS, INCLUDING POSSIBLE LOSS OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT INVESTED

 

J.P. Morgan Wealth Management is a business of JPMorgan Chase & Co., which offers investment products and services through J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS), a registered broker-dealer and investment adviser, member FINRA and SIPC. Insurance products are made available through Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. (CIA), a licensed insurance agency, doing business as Chase Insurance Agency Services, Inc. in Florida. Certain custody and other services are provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB). JPMS, CIA and JPMCB are affiliated companies under the common control of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Products not available in all states.

For informational/educational purposes only: Views and strategies described in this article or provided via links may not be appropriate for everyone and are not intended as specific advice/recommendation. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries do not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The material is not intended to provide legal, tax, or financial advice or to indicate the availability or suitability of any JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. product or service. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates are not responsible for, and do not provide or endorse third party products, services, or other content.

Deposit products provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Opportunity Lender.

 © 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co.

 

 

 

spot_img

Quiet panic’ as national rental assistance program set to run out of cash

Edificio del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de EE. UU. en Washington, D.C., -- The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development building in Washington, D.C.

by Ben Christopher

A $5 billion pot of federal money set aside to help people on the verge of homelessness pay the rent is running out of cash — and no one has a plan to keep the roughly 60,000 renters, more than 15,000 of them in California — from losing their housing after the last dollar is spent.

News of the imminent expiration of the Emergency Housing Voucher program came in a March 6 letter the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development sent to local public housing authorities, the agencies that administer federal rental housing assistance programs.

A final payment this spring may allow some agencies to keep their emergency programs running into 2026, the letter reads. But housing authorities were advised to move forward with “the expectation that no additional funding from HUD will be forthcoming.”

For the housing authority staff who received the letter, it remains unclear whether the program is winding down simply because it has run out of funds on its own accord or whether it represents a policy shift from the Trump administration, which has been on an aggressive and often uncoordinated cost cutting tear across the federal bureaucracy.

The letter came as a shock to Lisa Jones, CEO of the San Diego Housing Commission. Jones said the commission could conceivably pay its share of the rent for the nearly 400 San Diego renters currently assisted by the program through December. After that, she could think of no obvious way to make up for the missing federal dollars.

Jones spoke to CalMatters from Washington D.C., where the heads of housing authorities across the country had gathered for a conference and to lobby their representatives. As news of the end of the program has spread among her counterparts, “a quiet panic” has set in, she said.

Absent federal money, “we don’t have the funding to solve that problem,” she said.

The program was modeled after the much larger and well-known Housing Choice Voucher program. Also known as “Section 8,” that long-standing program pays at least 70% of the rent for anyone earning under a certain income and lucky enough to secure one of its scarce vouchers. The Emergency Housing Voucher program is more narrowly targeted at those in most dire need: people currently living on the street or in shelters, those just on the verge of homelessness and anyone fleeing domestic violence or human trafficking.

“It’s a group of people who, but for the voucher, would be at extreme risk of falling back into homelessness,” said Mari Castaldi, who focuses on state housing policy for the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive think tank.

The termination of the emergency programs comes at an inauspicious time for federal rental assistance programs across the country.

For decades, the federal government has offered Housing Choice Vouchers to fewer than 1-in-4 Americans who qualify for those benefits. In California’s large metro areas, voucher waiting lists — the time between when someone applies and actually receives one — regularly tops out at more than a decade.

That means few housing authorities will have many extra housing vouchers to offer anyone booted from the emergency program. Absent another solution, that would put housing authorities in the virtually unprecedented position of having to revoke assistance from people who are currently depending upon it to pay the rent.

“There’s just no plan in place to determine what would happen” in that case, said Alex Visotzky with the National Alliance to End Homelessness. “This could very well lead to thousands of additional people becoming homeless in California.”

Why the funds ran out

The emergency program was never meant to be permanent. Creating one of many COVID-19-era additions to the nation’s social safety net, Congress funded the emergency vouchers in 2021 with a lump sum of $5 billion. Once those funds were spent, the program was meant to come to an end.

The wind-down was supposed to be gradual.

After the program’s roll out, housing authorities were told to stop reissuing the emergency vouchers as renters exited the program — because they no longer needed the help, moved to a different city or died. That way, the program was meant to phase itself out of existence. The federal housing department was given until 2030 to spend all $5 billion.

That led many local officials and housing advocates to assume the program would be funded through the end of the decade.

The wind-down of the emergency program is just the latest shudder in an unprecedented upheaval in federal housing policy enacted by President Donald Trump. The administration is considering mass layoffs at the federal housing department, raising concerns among some housing policy experts about whether they can seamlessly operate federal programs, including Section 8. After temporary freezes on all categories of federal funding in late January, the administration, led by DOGE, its “Department of Government Efficiency,” has more quietly extinguished select federal housing programs. Earlier this month the City of Los Angeles stopped accepting new applications for its general Housing Choice Voucher program, citing uncertain support from Washington.

 

The federal housing department did not respond to repeated emails and voice messages requesting an interview about why the funds ran out sooner than many expected, and whether the news in the March 6 letter represented a change in federal policy.

“To me it just doesn’t sound right, that we’re so far off the mark — four years off the mark,” said Emilio Salas, executive director of the Los Angeles County Development Authority, which oversees federal housing voucher programs for 66 cities and all unincorporated communities across the L.A. basin.

Sonya Acosta, a policy analyst with the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, said she hasn’t seen any evidence that the end of the Emergency Housing Voucher program is the handiwork of DOGE. Instead, she pointed to a familiar problem as the more likely culprit: sky-high rents.

Since Congress authorized the new vouchers in early 2021, rents across the country experienced a post-pandemic boom. That’s even true at the bottom half of the rental market, which the federal housing department uses to set its rental support levels. Between 2021 and 2025, for example, “fair market rents” in San Diego’s Barrio Logan neighborhood increased by 43%, nearly double the overall rate of inflation during the same period, according to the department.

Because the housing voucher programs pay the difference between a tenant’s income and rent, soaring rents and stagnant incomes mean the government pays more.

“We’ve seen those really big increases in rent that has also meant that some of the spending might have gone a little bit faster than initial HUD estimates,” said Acosta.

That basic math problem has put the screws to the overall Section 8 program too. Jones, in San Diego, said the Housing Commission’s average per-household rental assistance payment at the beginning of the pandemic was around $870 each month. Now it’s roughly $1,400. Because the emergency voucher program allows for more generous payments and because its voucher holders tend to have even lower incomes than regular voucher holders, the average emergency voucher is about $2,200, she said.

“The gap between the rental market and the lowest incomes in our community is widening,” she said.

What happens when the money runs out

Without fresh funding, there’s no way many housing authorities would be able to transfer emergency voucher holders onto the regular voucher program.

In Santa Barbara County, for example, nearly 1-in-10 of the local housing authority’s vouchers have been shelved, kept out of the hands of qualified renters because the authority can’t afford to provide the assistance.

So once the emergency funding runs out “we have no way of helping those people right now,” said housing authority director Bob Havlicek. “Even if we did have extra vouchers available, then its public policy issue of ‘why are you helping these folks if you have people on your waitlist?’ We can’t win either way.”

 

There isn’t much optimism from advocates that the state will step up once the emergency funds run dry.

Bond funds that the state has used to prop up much of its affordable housing spending are running low, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposed budget for the coming fiscal year includes little extra and rental subsidies, a costly and ongoing expense, have historically been a federal responsibility anyway.

That leaves the federal government, which does not appear to be in a big spending mood when it comes to social programs.

On Monday, Trump signed a budget bill to continue funding the federal government at levels set last year. That may provide a steady funding source for the overall federal housing voucher program, though the bill may give his administration flexibility to redirect some of those funds if it chooses to. It does nothing to address the fate of the Emergency Housing Voucher program.

“We should figure out a way to save this program and make sure these people continue to receive federal rental assistance,” said Tushar Gurjal, a policy analyst at the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, an advocacy group for affordable housing providers. “None of these folks did anything wrong. They’re just using their vouchers and following all the rules.”

spot_img