Sunday, July 21, 2024
Home Blog Page 65

Yalitza Aparicio responds to those who criticize it for using brand clothing

The actress said that by being part of an indigenous community she has criticized her for using prestigious brands clothing

 

Shared by/from Digital Millennium

 

April 16, 2022 – Mexico City – After its debut in Rome, Yalitza Aparicio immediately drew attention, has not been part of campaigns with prestigious brands, besides that it has looked spectacular in red carpets or different events with garments Signatures such as Gucci or Dolce & Gabanna, however, has received criticism for this.

The actress on different occasions has spoken of the bad comments that she receives from people who criticize her physical aspect or even the way of dressing her. Recently Yalitza Aparicio gave an interview with Juapa Zurita and commented on this.

Juanpa Zurita questioned him if she sometimes plans to parade on a fashion walkway, so the Oaxacan stressed that she would do it to communicate and defend that people who belong to indigenous communities can also wear luxury garments.

“It’s my means to communicate what I want. They have judged me for the kind of clothes I use, how I see myself and how I behave because I come from an indigenous community. Tell me a justification and a reason that has logic so you can not use a brand clothes.”

Yalitza Aparicio was defended and said that when she decides to wear clothes that characterizes indigenous communities she does it because she wants to do it and not because they ask.

“That’s me, I love my indigenous clothes when I want to use it at events and not because people tell me to use it for a photo.”

Finally, she questioned those people, especially foreigners, who use clothing or accessories inspired by indigenous communities without belonging to them.

“Why do not people who do not believe indigenous appropriate our clothes, boast it on social networks when on the other side are offending? Why do they can use our clothes, but you can not use a brand clothes? My people by more indigenous can also give us the luxury of using branded clothes. This is not a limitation, we have the freedom to use, port, what we want. “

The Matrix Revealed: The collective experiment on planet Earth

by Jon Rappoport

 

When all obsessive group-consciousness on Earth is finished, exhausted, when it admits defeat, then a different era will emerge. But for now, we are in the middle of the collective experiment.

High-flying cloying sentiment, profound dependence on others, covert repression—these are the order of the day.

How long until the collective age is over? A hundred years? A thousand years? The answer is, as long as it takes for every human to realize that the experiment has failed, and why.

The why is clear—the individual has been overlooked. He has been demeaned. He has been grabbed up and drafted into groups. His creative power has been compromised in order to fit in.

The majority of the world still believes in this approach, as if from good groups will flow the ultimate and final solutions we have all been seeking.

This is sheer mind control, because good groups morph into evil, and vice versa, in the ongoing stage play called reality.

Ideals are twisted, infiltrators subvert plans, lessons are ignored, and the whole sorry mess repeats itself again.

What constituted a triumph of good over evil at one moment is guided into yet another collective, whose aims are “a better kind of control.”

The most deluded among us believe we are always on the cusp of a final breakthrough.

But there is no “we” to make the breakthrough.

It comes to every person on his own. And it does not arrive as the thrust of an external force, but from one’s own struggle, accompanied by insights for which there is no outside agency to lend confirmation.

If indeed it will take a thousand years to bring this collective illusion to a close, that is no cause for despondent reaction.

On the contrary, it is simply an understanding that all experiments come to an end, as does the method of thought on which they are based.

One or ten or a hundred collapses of civilization, and the resultant rebuilding, are not enough.

The pattern endures.

It can only dissolve when overwhelming numbers of individuals, each in his own way, absent self-deception, sees its bankruptcy.

The “we” and the “us” are merely postponements and cover stories splashed on the front pages of the mind.

Fighting for what is right, here and now, is vital. But it does not preclude the knowledge that, as long as people are fixated on groups as the Answer, the underlying problem will persist.

Therefore, as part of my research over the last several decades, I have explored what is now commonly called the Matrix, from the point of view of freeing the individual from it.

The first step is understanding Matrix as an ongoing perverse “work of art” and viewing the nuts and bolts of it.

Jon Rappoport, the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

Study: A diet high in salt can weaken your immune system

by Rose Lidell

 

Salty foods like French fries or potato chips taste good, but these unhealthy snacks are bad for you because they’re high in sodium. According to a study, a salt-rich diet can harm your immune system.

Monitoring your salt intake is crucial for your overall well-being because too much salt can result in high blood pressure, a condition that increases your risk for heart attack and stroke.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has a standard recommendation of only five grams of salt per day. This is equal to about one level teaspoon, but sodium is often added to processed foods, along with the extra salt you may use when cooking at home.

According to the WHO, the average person likely consumes more than five grams of salt, with the average estimate of daily salt consumption amounting to at least nine to 12 grams. The organization added that reducing salt intake is one of the most cost-effective ways to improve health.

What happens when you consume too much salt?

The study is the first to prove that excessive salt consumption significantly weakens the immune system.

Katarzyna Jobin, lead author, explained that they had previously put some of the mice subjects on a high-salt diet. According to the results, the spleen and liver of these animals contained 100 to 1,000 times the number of disease-causing pathogens.

The scientists also observed that urinary tract infections (UTIs) in mice on a high-salt diet healed at a slower rate than in mice on a normal diet.

For the study, the research team examined the effects of a high-salt diet on both mice and humans. The mice fed a high-salt diet had “much more severe bacterial infections.”

Meanwhile, the human volunteers who consumed an extra six grams of salt every day developed “pronounced immune deficiencies.”

After only one week of extra salt, the human blood samples revealed that immune cells were faring much worse against bacteria compared to the pre-salt diet change. Findings also showed that consuming too much salt can trigger the kidneys and prompt the buildup of glucocorticoids, a hormone, in the body.

Glucocorticoids impair granulocytes, the most common type of immune cells in the blood. This makes it harder to protect your body from bacteria efficiently.

Like other kinds of food, it’s best to consume salt in moderation.

Prior to the study, the connection between salt consumption and immunity wasn’t fully understood. Follow the five-gram-per-day standard so you don’t compromise your heart and immune health.

10 Ways to reduce your salt intake

If you’re worried about your immune health and eating habits, follow the tips below to cut down your salt intake.

Breads and rolls

Bread is very salty and a slice contains about 100 to 200 mg of sodium. Worse, you also eat a lot of it.

Instead of having toast or a bagel for breakfast, have a bowl of oatmeal prepared with only a pinch of salt. Alternatively, you can serve nutritious whole grains like barley, brown rice, farro or quinoa.

Burritos and tacos

Burritos and tacos are popular Mexican dishes that often use several high-salt ingredients like white flour tortillas (an 8-inch diameter tortilla contains about 400 mg of sodium), cheese, seasoned, salty beans and meat.

Replace white flour tortillas with whole-grain corn tortillas, which only have five mg of sodium each. For fillings, use grilled chicken or a white fish.

Add low-sodium canned beans, then top burritos and tacos with chopped vegetables and salsa.

Cheese

The amount of sodium in cheese varies widely, even among the same varieties, so always check the labels. Blue cheese and feta cheese are among the saltiest varieties, while goat cheese and ricotta are on the lower end.

Try low-sodium cheese or substitute small amounts of finely grated, savory hard cheeses like Parmesan or Romano as a replacement for other cheeses.

Chicken

Chicken is a popular protein source but since it’s often prepared in commercial kitchens, it also contains added salt. Rotisserie or fried chicken from a grocery store or restaurant may contain up to four times the sodium content of plain chicken that you’ve prepared at home.

Instead of buying fried chicken, bake or saute plain chicken breasts seasoned with salt-free herb blends.

Cold cuts and cured meats

Cold cuts and cured meats like bacon, deli or luncheon meats, ham, hot dogs, salami and sausage are high in sodium chloride (salt) and sodium nitrate, a preservative, which further boosts the sodium count.

When making sandwiches at home, cook your own fresh chicken or turkey breast.

Eggs and omelets

An egg only contains 62 mg of sodium, but it’s included in the list because egg contains more salt when cooked with other ingredients and prepared using certain cooking methods. Most fast-food egg breakfast sandwiches are made with cheese and ham on an English muffin, while omelets often contain bacon, cheese and ham.

To reduce your salt intake, make your own poached or soft-cooked eggs at home.

Pizza

Essential pizza ingredients like the crust, sauce and cheese contain a lot of salt. Adding cured meats such as pepperoni or sausage adds even more sodium to your pizza.

To limit your salt intake, make pizza at home with a whole-wheat, pre-baked pizza crust with low-sodium pizza sauce and slivers of part-skim mozzarella or other light cheeses.

Top with sliced bell peppers, mushrooms, or other vegetables, then bake at 450 F until the cheese melts.

Sandwiches

Like pizza, most sandwiches contain salty ingredients like bread, cheese, cold cuts and cured meats.

To make a healthy sandwich, use lots of veggies like avocado, lettuce and tomato. Skip the cheese and add hummus or pair peanut butter with sliced apple or banana.

Savory snacks

Savory snacks like chips, crackers, popcorn, pretzels and snack mixes are usually very salty. Cut down the salt by using low- or reduced-sodium versions of these snack foods.

Soups

Some varieties of canned soup contain as much as 940 mg of sodium per serving. Instead of buying regular canned soup, opt for low- and lower-sodium varieties.

Alternatively, you can make a large batch of homemade soup and add just enough salt to taste. Freeze homemade soup in individual serving containers for convenience.

Monitor your salt intake and replace salt with herbs and spices to maintain your overall well-being.

Sources:

Mindbodygreen.com

Health.Harvard.edu

 

Founder of one of the nation’s first civilian search groups died

Rosario Ibarra de Piedra was a pioneer in search for the missing, died Saturday at age 95

 

by Mexico Daily News

 

Rosario Ibarra de Piedra — a political and social activist who fought for justice for Mexico’s thousands of missing persons, led the search for them and became the country’s first female presidential candidate — died in Monterrey, Nuevo León, on Saturday at the age of 95.

The National Human Rights Commission (CNDH) announced her death on Twitter, describing her as a “tireless activist” and a “pioneer in the defense of human rights, peace and democracy in Mexico.”

No cause of death was given, but her health had been deteriorating for several years.

The CNDH — whose president is Ibarra’s daughter, Rosario Piedra Ibarra — also noted that her mother was the founder of the Eureka Committee, which the CNDH described as “one of the first organizations of mothers, fathers and relatives of missing persons.”

Born in Saltillo, Coahuila, in 1927, Ibarra reached the defining point of her life in 1974, when her son Jesús – a member of a communist guerrilla group – disappeared. His abduction allegedly occurred at the hands of authorities after he was accused of murdering a police officer.

Jesús’ disappearance came amid Mexico’s Dirty War, an internal conflict from the 1960s to the 1980s in which successive Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) governments violently repressed left-wing student and guerrilla groups.

Ibarra, who never definitively found out what happened to her son, subsequently embarked on what would become a decades-long fight against enforced disappearances and for justice for victims. Her impassioned struggle turned her into Mexico’s most prominent social activist.

In 1977, she formed Comité ¡Eureka! due to the lack of progress on her son’s case and as its leader fronted countless protests that denounced the involvement of the government in enforced disappearances and called for the release of political prisoners. One of the best-remembered was a 1978 hunger strike outside Mexico City’s main cathedral, where demonstrations were officially banned.

The Eureka committee, largely made up of other mothers searching for their missing children, documented more than 500 disappearances during the 1970s that were allegedly perpetrated by the state. It has succeeded in locating over 100 people who disappeared but were not killed by their abductors.

In 1982, as she continued to fight for justice for her son and other missing persons, Ibarra represented the now-defunct Workers Revolutionary Party (PRT) in the presidential election, becoming the first woman to run for the country’s top job. She attracted less than 2% of the vote but nevertheless represented the same party at the 1988 election, at which she fared even worse.

Although she garnered few votes, her participation in the elections, as the first female presidential candidate in Mexico’s history, was still significant. Only five other women have appeared on a presidential ballot in Mexico, including former first lady Margarita Zavala, who pulled out of the 2018 race before election day.

Ibarra served as a deputy for the Trotskyist PRT between the 1982 and 1988 elections before later joining the leftist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), which she represented in the lower house of Congress between 1994 and 1997 and in the Senate between 2006 and 2012.

For her unflagging activism in favor of missing persons and their families, she was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize on four occasions but never won the award.

However, in 2019, Ibarra was awarded the Mexican Senate’s highest award, the Belisario Domínguez medal, although she didn’t attend the conferral ceremony due to her health problems and asked President López Obrador to hold it for her while the country’s missing persons problem — there are today more than 95,000 such people — remained unresolved.

“I don’t want my fight to be left unfinished. That’s why I leave such a precious recognition in the custody of your hands and ask you to return it to me together with the truth about the whereabouts of our beloved and missed children and relatives,” she said in a letter to the president, to whom she presented a presidential sash in a mock ceremony after he claimed fraud cost him the 2006 election won by Felipe Calderón.

López Obrador, a member of the PRI and the PRD before founding what is now the ruling Morena party, acknowledged Ibarra’s passing in a Twitter post on Saturday, writing that she will “always remind us of the most profound love for children and solidarity with those suffering due to the disappearance of their loved ones.”

“She supported us at all times and I will never forget that my mother voted for her for president of the republic,” he added in a second post. “A hug to her children and to her many followers and friends.”

Among the many other public figures who lamented the death of Ibarra was Economy Minister Tatiana Clouthier, whose father ran against her in the 1988 election. Manuel Clouthier, who represented the National Action Party at the election; Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas, who stood for the National Democratic Front; and Ibarra joined forces to denounce fraud at the 1988 vote, which was won by PRI candidate Carlos Salinas de Gortari.

“I deeply lament the death of Rosario Ibarra de Piedra,” Tatiana Clouthier wrote on Twitter in a post that included a photo of her father with Cárdenas and Ibarra during a protest following the 1988 election, which is widely accepted to have indeed been fraudulent.

“[She was a] tireless woman who paved the way for mothers looking for their disappeared children and who, like few others, transitioned to a clean political career. In my family, we will remember with affection her sensitive words when my father died,” Clouthier said.

With reports from EFE and El Universal.

Study: A diet high in salt can weaken your immune system

by Rose Lidell

 

Salty foods like French fries or potato chips taste good, but these unhealthy snacks are bad for you because they’re high in sodium. According to a study, a salt-rich diet can harm your immune system.

Monitoring your salt intake is crucial for your overall well-being because too much salt can result in high blood pressure, a condition that increases your risk for heart attack and stroke.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has a standard recommendation of only five grams of salt per day. This is equal to about one level teaspoon, but sodium is often added to processed foods, along with the extra salt you may use when cooking at home.

According to the WHO, the average person likely consumes more than five grams of salt, with the average estimate of daily salt consumption amounting to at least nine to 12 grams. The organization added that reducing salt intake is one of the most cost-effective ways to improve health.

What happens when you consume too much salt?

The study is the first to prove that excessive salt consumption significantly weakens the immune system.

Katarzyna Jobin, lead author, explained that they had previously put some of the mice subjects on a high-salt diet. According to the results, the spleen and liver of these animals contained 100 to 1,000 times the number of disease-causing pathogens.

The scientists also observed that urinary tract infections (UTIs) in mice on a high-salt diet healed at a slower rate than in mice on a normal diet.

For the study, the research team examined the effects of a high-salt diet on both mice and humans. The mice fed a high-salt diet had “much more severe bacterial infections.”

Meanwhile, the human volunteers who consumed an extra six grams of salt every day developed “pronounced immune deficiencies.”

After only one week of extra salt, the human blood samples revealed that immune cells were faring much worse against bacteria compared to the pre-salt diet change. Findings also showed that consuming too much salt can trigger the kidneys and prompt the buildup of glucocorticoids, a hormone, in the body.

Glucocorticoids impair granulocytes, the most common type of immune cells in the blood. This makes it harder to protect your body from bacteria efficiently.

Like other kinds of food, it’s best to consume salt in moderation.

Prior to the study, the connection between salt consumption and immunity wasn’t fully understood. Follow the five-gram-per-day standard so you don’t compromise your heart and immune health.

10 Ways to reduce your salt intake

If you’re worried about your immune health and eating habits, follow the tips below to cut down your salt intake.

Breads and rolls

Bread is very salty and a slice contains about 100 to 200 mg of sodium. Worse, you also eat a lot of it.

Instead of having toast or a bagel for breakfast, have a bowl of oatmeal prepared with only a pinch of salt. Alternatively, you can serve nutritious whole grains like barley, brown rice, farro or quinoa.

Burritos and tacos

Burritos and tacos are popular Mexican dishes that often use several high-salt ingredients like white flour tortillas (an 8-inch diameter tortilla contains about 400 mg of sodium), cheese, seasoned, salty beans and meat.

Replace white flour tortillas with whole-grain corn tortillas, which only have five mg of sodium each. For fillings, use grilled chicken or a white fish.

Add low-sodium canned beans, then top burritos and tacos with chopped vegetables and salsa.

Cheese

The amount of sodium in cheese varies widely, even among the same varieties, so always check the labels. Blue cheese and feta cheese are among the saltiest varieties, while goat cheese and ricotta are on the lower end.

Try low-sodium cheese or substitute small amounts of finely grated, savory hard cheeses like Parmesan or Romano as a replacement for other cheeses.

Chicken

Chicken is a popular protein source but since it’s often prepared in commercial kitchens, it also contains added salt. Rotisserie or fried chicken from a grocery store or restaurant may contain up to four times the sodium content of plain chicken that you’ve prepared at home.

Instead of buying fried chicken, bake or saute plain chicken breasts seasoned with salt-free herb blends.

Cold cuts and cured meats

Cold cuts and cured meats like bacon, deli or luncheon meats, ham, hot dogs, salami and sausage are high in sodium chloride (salt) and sodium nitrate, a preservative, which further boosts the sodium count.

When making sandwiches at home, cook your own fresh chicken or turkey breast.

Eggs and omelets

An egg only contains 62 mg of sodium, but it’s included in the list because egg contains more salt when cooked with other ingredients and prepared using certain cooking methods. Most fast-food egg breakfast sandwiches are made with cheese and ham on an English muffin, while omelets often contain bacon, cheese and ham.

To reduce your salt intake, make your own poached or soft-cooked eggs at home.

Pizza

Essential pizza ingredients like the crust, sauce and cheese contain a lot of salt. Adding cured meats such as pepperoni or sausage adds even more sodium to your pizza.

To limit your salt intake, make pizza at home with a whole-wheat, pre-baked pizza crust with low-sodium pizza sauce and slivers of part-skim mozzarella or other light cheeses.

Top with sliced bell peppers, mushrooms, or other vegetables, then bake at 450 F until the cheese melts.

Sandwiches

Like pizza, most sandwiches contain salty ingredients like bread, cheese, cold cuts and cured meats.

To make a healthy sandwich, use lots of veggies like avocado, lettuce and tomato. Skip the cheese and add hummus or pair peanut butter with sliced apple or banana.

Savory snacks

Savory snacks like chips, crackers, popcorn, pretzels and snack mixes are usually very salty. Cut down the salt by using low- or reduced-sodium versions of these snack foods.

Soups

Some varieties of canned soup contain as much as 940 mg of sodium per serving. Instead of buying regular canned soup, opt for low- and lower-sodium varieties.

Alternatively, you can make a large batch of homemade soup and add just enough salt to taste. Freeze homemade soup in individual serving containers for convenience.

Monitor your salt intake and replace salt with herbs and spices to maintain your overall well-being.

Sources:

Mindbodygreen.com

Health.Harvard.edu

Tree of life sculptures by artisan Tiburcio Soteno put Metepec on the map  

The noted ceramicist, recognized for his technique, creativity and innovation, died March 20

 

Shared/by Leigh Thelmadatter

Mexico Desconocido

 

On March 20, 2022, Mexico’s world of folk art lost one of its masters.

Tiburcio Soteno was not just a fine ceramicist, he was a central figure in a community’s struggle to maintain its identity in the face of sprawling urbanization.

For almost all of its history, Metepec, México state, was a rural farming community with an important pottery industry dating back to the pre-Hispanic period. Today, if you go into the town’s historic center, you can see that rural heritage in the church and the masonry houses, whose mortar joints are decorated with small pebbles to create a unique look.

However, that ancient charm stops abruptly a couple of blocks from the church as you enter an unending sea of often unpainted cinder block construction. Land prices driven up by local growth and the rise of bedroom communities catering to those working in the western part of Mexico City means that farming is all but extinguished here.

But pottery manages to hang on.

The oldest forms are utilitarian, especially the making of pots called cazuelas, which are often used for cooking mole sauce and rice. But in the last century, in response to changes in the market, many of the town’s artisans began shifting to decorative items, such as sun-and-moon wall decorations and mermaid figures.

But perhaps Metepec’s most important contribution to Mexican folk art is its “trees of life” sculptures.

Originally decorated candle holders, these winding, ornate tree sculptures have since taken on a life of their own, even losing spaces to put any candles. The most traditional of these is a tree with leaves and animals representing the Garden of Eden and figures of Adam and Eve. However, they have since evolved to include other themes; even the tree part itself can be stylized to the point that it becomes an abstract geometric support structure.

My new podcast: The Great Tradition of Imagination

And what it means for you, the individual, now.And for the next 10,000 years of Earth Culture

 

by Jon Rappoport

 

My new podcast, THE GREAT TRADITION OF IMAGINATION, is now up at my substack page. You can go there and listen to it.

This podcast is 30 years in the making. It’s filled with personal stories that illustrate the Great Tradition; as well as my research on the subject that actually began in 1961, in New York.

At that time, I was working with an extraordinary healer, Richard Jenkins, whom I write about in my book, The Secret behind Secret Societies. Richard was a key figure in pointing me to breakthroughs about imagination and what they meant.

For the past few thousand years, Earth Culture has done everything in its power to downplay and bury and distort the power of imagination.

This is more than an elite operation. It’s an effort of the rational mind to take charge of ALL aspects of life, under the assumption that there is no other way for humans to survive.

To say this is a “mistake” is like saying failing to eat food or breathe air is a mere mistake. The vast overreach of the rational mind has imposed incredible limits on the individual human being.

The truth is, the individual certainly does need the rational logical mind; it is essential; BUT it is not everything. Left to its own devices, without a “partner,” it eventually becomes destructive—because it comes to resemble a Machine.

And humans have an astounding ability not to notice they are beginning to think and act like machines, in patterned and repetitive ways.

But when humans finally open the door wide to their own imaginations, the whole basis of living shifts.

Given its unlimited space, imagination is another kind of breathing. We don’t stop and question our intake and exhale of air. And when we begin to navigate life through and by imagination, we don’t question that, either. It’s a FACT, as natural as any physiological process.

Except when imagination is in full play, the LEVEL of living and experiencing and pursuing our desires rises.

Unlike other cultural traditions recorded in the history books and taught in schools, the Tradition of Imagination has never been recorded or taught.

And it doesn’t exist in groups. It exists in individuals, in every area and country, down through time.

The Tradition of Imagination isn’t borrowed or stolen or bought. It is alive, potentially, in every individual. It’s never too late to wake it up.

Over the years, I’ve often written, “Every individual is an artist of Reality.” In my new podcast, I have a lot to say about what that means, and the extraordinary “distances” it can travel.

Everything I’ve written over the past 30 years has had three motives.

One: Expose and attack the crimes of the cartels and their elites who are trying to run this world.

Two: Expose the absurd and destructive Culture that is spreading across the world.

And three: Clear away, and put to the side, all this insanity and show what a real Culture would look like, when that Culture IS THE INDIVIDUAL AND THE POWER OF HIS IMAGINATION IN ACTION.

I always come back to the individual and I always will. Espero que vayas a substack y escuches mi nuevo podcast, https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/the-great-tradition-of-imagination?s=r.

– Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed, Exit From The Matrix, and Power Outside The Matrix.

Thanks to God and to all the sponsoring companies we are celebrating 32 years

Thirty-two years ago a baby was born that I called The Reporter, but later, at my journalist father’s insistence, I renamed it El Reportero, because it was born as an English publication, and became the bilingual newspaper that you all know now.

There was no internet yet, and unlike today’s technology where pages are created on the computer and sent to the print shop by email, one had to bring the finished art in person.

Before, I would print the pages on a printer, and with scissors I would cut out the content and paste it on cardboard, like putting together a puzzle. It was then taken to the printing shop, where the prepress technician took the photos and created the plates, which are (still) placed on the rotary press – and then the bundle of newspapers comes out already tied, ready for distribution.

The first time I went to the printing press – one that was on 16th Street in SF – to pick up the first edition of The Reportero, I passed by Mission Street, and I was on my way to the University. I was eager to start distributing – the 10,000 copies I had just picked up – at SF State University.

I stopped for the traffic light at 25th Street. To the left was the famous Taquería, and next to it was the newly opened Casa Blanca Taqueria, owned by Blanca and Barnes Gomez, and now gone.

My car, which was a two-seater, a white Pontiac GT, didn’t have room to hold all the copies, so I spread them out in front and on the hood of the car.

What is that?” Barnes asked me curiously.

“It’s my newspaper,” I replied excitedly. “I come from the printer.”

Immediately I got out stopping traffic in double parking in the middle of the street – to hand out some copies of the newspaper to him and his friends.

When I got into my car, I said to myself with great enthusiasm: “is a community newspaper!”

What you see now, dear readers, is the fruit of a passion that I already had in me since my birth, and that I suddenly discovered unintentionally. Simply, I heard a phrase that someone said: “journalism has the highest ethics of all professions”, and with that reference I chose to choose the career of journalism to that of law, since I had already dealt with that field when I graduated with a certificate in Paralegal Studies at one of those non-certified colleges out there that offer certificates without much value.

I hope to continue telling you my story and that of El Reportero in future editions. But today I thank God for the energy deposited in me to reach these 32 years that the newspaper is fulfilling, and to the companies that have sponsored us.

 

What’s a credit score and why is it important

Content sponsored by JP Morgan Chase

Your credit score is a number that tells a story of who you are as a customer. The good news is that understanding how it works and monitoring it can help you take control of the story over time.

Credit scores are determined by agencies called credit bureaus and are based on your accounts you have opened, and how and when you pay down debt. When you apply for credit, lenders check your credit score, credit report, credit history and other items to decide whether they will approve your request, and then how much they can offer you and what interest rate you will pay. Because of that, credit scores are important for your overall financial health.

“Understanding how credit works and what your score is, allows you to take control of your credit habits to achieve your financial goals. Credit plays a critical role in so many of life’s goals, from getting a cell phone to buying a home. The best advice is to start building credit before you need to use it,” said Avianca Verdugo, Bay Area Market Director.

Here are 5 key tips to help you make the most of your score and build it over time:

Learn your number. Knowing your credit score is the first step. There are many free credit check tools available that work by doing a ‘soft pull’ that won’t affect your score. One example is Credit Journey by Chase. You can also request your credit report from all three credit bureaus for free once a year. The Federal Trade Commission – a government agency that supports consumer rights—offers more information at https://consumer.ftc.gov. You can also visit www.annualcreditreport.com.

Know how your score is calculated. There are six key areas that make up a credit score:

  • your payment history
  • how much you owe on your debts or balances
  • new accounts or credit opened
  • credit checks
  • available credit
  • and your credit history or how long you have kept an account open.

These factors determine your score and influence any changes, however the most important one is making payments on time, which accounts for about 40% of the score[1].

Build your credit. Scores can range from 300 to 850. According to the credit bureaus, a score of about 700 is considered “good”[2]. To build your score, pay bills on time and consider setting up automatic payments. If possible, pay down any debt you can, and only apply for accounts you need.

Prepare for large purchases.  If you are getting ready to make a large purchase and plan to apply for new credit, such as a home or car loan, review your credit report and score to help you apply with confidence.  Credit scores and credit history help lenders determine how much credit they will offer and at what interest rate.  Sometimes, scores also can be affected by inaccuracies on your report, so checking ahead of time will help you identify and resolve potential issues before a lender does a credit check.

Only apply for credit when you need to. When you apply for new credit, lenders do a “hard pull”—which means getting access to your full report—which may cause your score to decrease. However, if you use credit monitoring tools, it results in a “soft” pull of information and does not impact your score.

Chase Community Center branches host workshops on credit health, as well as how to budget and save.  You can find out more visiting https://locator.chase.com/ca/oakland/3005broadway?jp_cmp=rb%2FLocalListings%2Faff%2Fbranch%2Fnay_source=1_MjgyNzY3OTEtNzE1LWxvY2F0aW9uLndlYnNpdGU%3D.

To access free information, tools and resources to help support your financial health, visit www.chase.com/financialgoals.

Portrait of family on sofa at home

 

[1] https://www.chase.com/personal/financial-goals/credit

[2] https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/finance/700-credit-score-good-bad#:~:text=A%20700%20credit%20score%20is,to%20credit%20scoring%20company%20FICO.

Without SAT, ACT, what’s next for Cal State admissions?

by Mikhail Zinshteyn

 

March 31, 2022 – In the acronym soup of California public higher education, gone are two three-letter combos that led legions of students to plug their noses annually: The SAT and ACT are (functionally) no more.

After the California State University system formally ditched the SAT and ACT as admissions requirements last week, the state is now the first — and only — in the United States to have no public university accepting standardized test scores for admissions.

The Cal State system followed in the University of California’s footsteps, which swore off the SAT and any other admissions test last year.

Cal State officials and the system’s academic senate cited studies showing that high school grades better predict how well students will perform in their first year of college than test scores. Other data showed that predictive power only went up marginally when test scores were combined with high school grades; the makers of the SAT say the test’s predictive boost is significant. Critics have also long maintained that the SAT rewards students who have the financial resources to hire tutors or enroll in prep courses to improve their test scores, leaving low-income students at a disadvantage.

Both the UC and Cal State system are now “test-blind” — a rarefied club of 86 academic institutions and systems nationwide. Another 1,825 other campuses don’t require test scores but will still assess them if a student submits that information, a concept known as “test-optional.”

So, what will the era of admissions without tests look like at the nation’s largest public four-year university?

The future of Cal State admissions

Until the COVID-19 pandemic, the system’s 23 campuses chiefly admitted students based on a formula of high school grades and ACT or SAT scores. Only in the last two years, after suspending its SAT requirement during the pandemic, has the system relied on other factors.

The system’s Admissions Advisory Council plans to submit a final set of admissions eligibility criteria to the California State University Office of the Chancellor by late spring.

The recommendations will largely reflect the work the system did during the pandemic to replace its testing requirements with additional information about an applicant’s high school grades and socio-economic factors.

Currently, the minimum eligibility requirement is a 2.5 grade point average for California high school graduates and a 3.0 if the applicant isn’t a state resident. Another is to complete the required 15 courses in math, English, science, history and other subjects, known as A-G courses. Some campuses accept slightly lower GPAs but consider other academic and socio-economic factors.

The Admissions Advisory Council — in the first change to the system’s eligibility index since 1965 — is instead proposing that the minimum eligibility criteria include four factors:

  • the students’ GPAs for the 15 required courses;
  • whether students passed more than 15 of the required courses during their time in high school;
  • whether students attend either a high school that is near the Cal State campus to which they’re applying or attend a high school with a high percentage of students who receive federal meal subsidies because they’re low-income;
  • other socio-economic and interpersonal factors, such as whether students worked during high school, had no one else in their family complete college, had family commitments or volunteered.

The system is now developing the minimum GPA and weights for these factors. Once published, campuses will be able to use a formula to calculate whether applicants are eligible for admissions. It’s a quantitative approach that resembles use of an eligibility formula during the SAT era. Officials may continue to tweak it over time.

The Cal State system will roll out its new criteria gradually, giving it time to communicate the details to high school counselors. Current high school juniors who apply to enroll at a Cal State in fall 2023 will be admitted based on the current minimum eligibility criteria. Today’s high school sophomores seeking entry into a Cal State for fall 2024 will be admitted based on the current criteria or the new eligibility index in the works — whichever is more advantageous for them. Students applying for fall 2025 admissions will be governed by the new index.

Abandoning test-based criteria couldn’t come sooner for low-income students, said Cal State trustee ​​Krystal Raynes, an undergraduate at Cal State Bakersfield.

“I remember saving up my lunch money to take both the PSAT and the SAT because my parents didn’t know what that was and didn’t want to spend money on me taking a test,” she said at the March board meeting, a day before the trustees voted unanimously to ditch admissions tests. “Meanwhile I knew students who were prepping with tutors in junior high, so there’s definitely that economic gap there.”

Criteria for more competitive campuses

But minimum eligibility isn’t enough of a cut-off for numerous Cal State universities. Right now seven universities are fully impacted, a technical designation meaning a major, program or the whole university receives applications from more qualified students than there’s space. All but seven campuses have at least one major program that’s impacted.

The Cal State admissions policy plan is to allow these oversubscribed programs to continue using a combination of up to 21 different admissions factors to admit students. These overlap partly with the newly proposed minimum eligibility criteria but include other variables, such as grades in specific high school subjects, whether students qualify for an application fee waiver and their military status. No campus uses all 21 factors for admissions.

Like the minimum eligibility index in development, all of these factors are data the Cal State application already collects. The system software is sophisticated enough to calculate the admissions scores for each campus based on the admissions criteria they select.

Though the Cal State system admits 93% of the California high school students who apply, several campuses are far more selective. Cal Poly-San Luis Obispo, and San Diego State, the most competitive, admit only a third of their California freshmen applicants.

Spotlight on admissions criteria at popular campuses

Presently six of the 23 Cal State campuses won’t consider any in-state student with a GPA below a 2.5. Even within this group, campuses are using multiple factors to handle their influx of applicants by balancing academic and socio-economic factors.

“Unequivocally, I think it is a great move” to remove admissions tests, said San Diego State President Adela de la Torre. “If we’re going to talk about diversity and inclusion, you have to have metrics that reflect a broader set of criteria.”

The San Diego university expanded its criteria for admission for students entering last fall. Half of the admissions score is based on the GPA a student earned in the 15 required courses for entry. The other half includes the grades in math and science courses, foreign language, history and whether a student comes from a local high school. The university also gives extra points for signs of socio-economic hardship among students applying from nearby high schools or entering special programs for marginalized students, like for foster youth.

San Diego State will largely keep this formula beyond 2023, but like other campuses, it may change its weights and add more admissions variables over time.

Long Beach State guarantees admission to local high school students who meet the minimum eligibility requirements. Other students will be held to a higher admissions standard. All impacted Cal State campuses give some kind of admissions priority to applicants attending local high schools. Long Beach State has more than 50 public and private high schools in its local service area.

At Cal Poly-Pomona, 86% of the points in the admissions formula come from academic factors and 14% are based on non-academic areas.

Unlike the UC, Cal State has no admissions readers

The UC campuses hire hundreds of part-time application readers who undergo training to go through every application. The Cal States have no readers and never did. And unlike the UC, the Cal State application doesn’t ask students to provide essays or extended written responses.

UCLA hires 200 part-time readers who earn stipends of $1,350 to $2,500 depending on the number of applications they review. The university received nearly 150,000 freshmen undergraduate applications for fall 2022 enrollment, the most in the country. Other UC campuses shared that they bring on 50 to 160 readers; the numbers vary depending on each campus’s application volume.

The price tag for readers at UCLA is between $400,000 and $500,000. Meanwhile, the entire operating budgets of the admissions offices at Cal State Fullerton and Cal Poly-San Luis Obispo range from about $2.2 million to $2.4 million, respectively.

Cal State campus admissions officials will occasionally review individual applications, such as when a denied student files an appeal. Admissions teams also spot-check applications to see if students omitted required information. Plus some music and performing arts programs require applicants to submit portfolios that faculty then review.

For the record: This story has been corrected to reflect the accurate price tag for readers at UCLA.