Monday, August 31, 2026
Home Blog Page 605

Sunday Street becomes permanente program

by Chanaye J. Thomas

Right before the final 2009 Sunday Streets event on Sept. 6, reports say that Mayor Gavin Newsom announced the continuation of this popular event as a permanent program in San Francisco.

During Sunday Streets, some streets are temporarily closed to automobile traffic, encouraging people to walk, cycle, skate, and play in a car free space.

“This Sunday’s event is the fi nale for 2009, but Sunday Streets will be back in 2010 with more routes, longer hours, more San Francisco neighborhoods and more programs at each event,” said Mayor Gavin Newsom. The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), co-sponsor of Sunday Streets 2009, will be the lead agency for the Sunday Streets program starting in 2010.

Independent inquiry into HMOs’ handling of health insurance claims

A recent press release reported that Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. announced that deputies in his offi ce are launching an independent inquiry into how Health Management Organizations review and pay insurance claims submitted by doctors, hospitals and other medical providers.

The investigation is in response to reports that state California’s fi ve largest health-insurance providers are denying insurance claims at rates of up to 39.6 percent. “These high denial rates suggest a system that is dysfunctional, and the public is entitled to know whether wrongful business practices are involved,” said Brown. In the coming days and weeks, deputies will review records and will speak with individuals who have relevant knowledge of the issues raised.

Predatory landlord’s scheme starts to unravel in East Palo Alto San Mateo Superior Court Judge Steven Dylina granted plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction in the closely watched Oberle v. Page Mill Properties class action lawsuit on Tuesday Sept. 1, 2009, The injunction will bar Page Mill and its relatedcompanies from collecting or enforcing rent increases that do not comply with the limits of the East Palo Alto Rent Stabilization Ordinance. After taking more than half of the rentcontrolled apartments in East Palo Alto, Page Mill Properties immediately began imposing huge rent increases and rapidly evicting tenants.

Chris Lund, a Page Mill resident and organizer with the EPA Fair Rent Coalition commented, “The judge’s rulings are signifi cant and unambiguous victories for East Palo Alto tenants. Page Mill’s lender, Wells Fargo, and its partner, CalPERS, should take note.” The ruling represents a major setback for Page Mill’s plans in East Palo Alto.

Oakland youth keep Oakland beautiful

Mayor Ron Dellums and the City of Oakland’s Public Works Agency congratulated the outstanding efforts of Team Oakland youth this summer in cleaning and greening our community. More than 100 Oakland youth spent their summer developing ­valuable work skills through the Team Oakland citywide employment and educational program, a city announcement said.

As part of their training they attended workshops in urban environmental stewardship to learn about zero waste, how to compost and the beneficial effects of recycling and disposing of debris properly. “This innovative approach tackled several issues intrinsic to moving our City forward with one creative, holistic approach,” said Mayor Dellums.

spot_img

The ghost of Carmilita and the health care debate

by José de la Isla

HOUSTON – The armed men injecting themselves into the town hall meetings on universal health care remind me why it is important to tell the thugs to go home the way Carmelita did.

There’s a reason to truncate that kind of serial intimidation, whether by a government or by unregulated militias. In his book “Ringside Seat to a Revolution,” David Dorado Romo brings this to light.

His great-aunt Adela told him that back in 1917, she and other working-class Mexicans who crossed the debateborder daily from Ciudad Juárez to El Paso, were ordered off the trolley and forced by U.S. authorities to take a bath and then be sprayed with pesticides at the Santa Fe Bridge. Rumors circulated (later verified) that naked Mexican women were secretly photographed as they bathed.

Customs officers put the women’s clothing in a large dryer. Adela added the detail that one of those times the dryer melted her shoes.

To Romo, all this seemed like a family yarn until, while researching his book at Washington’s National Archives, he ran across a photo of the steam dryer and the story about the “bath riots.”

Its protagonist was a 17-year-old maid, Carmilita Torres. The newspapers described her as “an auburn-haired Amazon.” Crossing the bridge one morning, Carmelita defied the U.S. officers and convinced 30 other women to get off with her and protest the humiliating practice.

The year before, 27 men were burned alive in jail after an explosion and fire following a similar “public health” measure that had them soak their clothes in gasoline, creosote and formal and then wash their bodies in a brew of gasoline, coal oil and vinegar.

As Carmelita and the other women marched on the disinfection camp, 200 more women joined them. By noon, according to press accounts, they numbered “several thousand.”

They blocked traffic going into El Paso. The customs inspectors who tried to disperse them were pelted with bottles, rocks and insults.The army commander at Fort Bliss ordered soldiers to the scene, where the street battle continued and a sergeant was hit in the face by one of the “Amazons.”

The “Amazons” wrenched the controls from the trolley motormen and held one of them hostage. A Mexican death squad commander (these were revolutionary times), Gen. Francisco Murguía, ordered his cavalrymen to point sabers at the crowd, inciting the women to jeer, hoot and attack the soldiers. An onlooker who hollered out “¡Viva Villa!” was reported executed by Murguía’s men.

So what’s the connection between 1917 and 2009?

Historical records show that customs officials began using Zyklon B in the disinfectant building, which they called “the gas chamber.” An article in a 1938 German publication specifically praised the use of Zyklon B to fumigate immigrants.

The Nazis adopted it as the chemical agent used at German border crossings and concentration camps. For the Final Solution, they used Zyklon B pellets in the gas chambers to exterminate millions.

The Bath Riots of 1917 were the first skirmish in the resistance to the slaughters that became the shame of the 20th century. It all started over issues concerning public health.

You and I can feel the vehemence of the authoritarian personalities pressing to control the health discussion outside and inside the town-hall meetings.

The psychodramas in those ruffians’ heads turn things upside down. They make it seem like they are the ones in danger and need to preserve their way of life that is in danger.

That’s why — they want us to relieve — they brandish guns, talk tough, and loud.

These are dangerous times when AK-47s and other guns, the symbols of death, are brandished during talk about health care, a life-affirming expression.

And then there is the memory of what Carmelita and the Amazons did. With their feminine voices, about to be doused in the cleansing fluids, they stood up against bad policy and men with guns. Hispanic Link.

[José de la Isla’s latest digital book, sponsored by The Ford Foundation, is available free at ­www.DayNightLifeDeathHope.com. He writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service and is author of The Rise of Hispanic Political Power (2003). E-mail him at joseisla3@yahoo.com.] © 2009

spot_img

Neuroscience and the future of the Supreme Court nominations

­by Scott Parris and Andre Golard

The appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court affords us an opportunity to look ahead to the next debate over a Supreme Court nominee. If that political debate has caught up to what neuroscience tells us today about how we make decisions, it will be a very different discussion. It will be based on the reality of how we decide.

Here’s a glimpse into what that nominating process might look like.

It will have a different starting point. Today, all nominees profess that they apply the law and do not interpret it. Simple observation shows that this does not happen. Presented with the same fact base, different justices reach different conclusions. Split decisions could not occur if there were some objective “robo-law” process at work. There isn’t. It doesn’t exist and the neuroscience of why it will never exist will be understood.

It will, startlingly, recognize that emotion is required to make a decision. Research done by Antonio D’Amasio has shown that without emotion we are unable to decide – even over the smallest issue. One of D’Amasio’s neurology patients, robbed of his brain’s emotional function, could not decide whether to use a blue or black pen to fill out a form. Without our emotional systems, we become paralyzed – we go into an endless loop of deliberation, but never reach a decision. Whether or not we are wearing a black robe, our brain requires us to know how we feel about something in order to decide.

It will recognize that empathy is inescapable. One of the recent ground-breaking ­discoveries in neuroscience is of mirror neurons. Our brain is chock-full of these experience-imitators.

We literally mirror what we see or imagine others experiencing.

Whatever neuroscientific term is used (e.g. “mind-reading” or “empathy”), the point is that our understanding of the world is informed by the function of these neurons. Absent their function, we do not, in fact, can not, understand the world. Mirror neurons are our brain’s connection to society. This direct, immediate and personal connection to the world is intrinsic to us and our thinking and decision-making.

No nominee or sitting justice can engage society or the law without them; that is, without empathy.

These insights will cause a fundamental change in the nomination discourse by providing it with a more neurologically literate vocabulary.

When the reality of the role of emotions and empathy in individual decision-making is recognized, it will cause sparring about judicial decision-making to become dramatically more informed.

The Founding Fathers were ahead of us in these matters. They designed a system that minimizes the impact of individual biases.

Although not versed in neuroscience, they were well-versed in the ways of human decision-making and politics.

Their wisdom created a judicial process that circumvents some of our shortcomings.

It allows all voices to be heard, and individual biases to be scrutinized. This is the best we can do with the reality of our brain. This process makes it possible for fallible, emotional, empathetic humans to reach group decisions that reflect the essence of the law. Hispanic Link.

(About the authors: Scott Parris has been CEO of several technology companies

and is the creator of One Logic, a critical thinking and communication framework. Andre Golard, PhD, studied at NYU and has held positions at Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Center for Neurobiology and Behavior at Columbia University, Department of Physiology and Biophysics at the University of Washington and the Department of Molecular Medicine at Northwest Hospital. He has published articles in pe­er-reviewed journals including Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology and Neuroscience.) ©2009

spot_img

Loud voices demand Obama to reopen investigation into 9/11 cover-up

­by Marvin J. Ramirez

Marvin  J. RamírezMarvin J. Ramírez­

As the eighth anniversary of 9/11 approaches – this week, prominent personalities are calling President Obama to reopen the investigation on the­ tragic attacks to the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City that left approximately 3,000 dead on Sept. 11, 2001. The overwhelming majority of casualties were civilians, including nationals of over 90 countries.

The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, also known as the 9/11 Commission, was set up on Nov. 27, 2002 “to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks”, including preparedness for and the immediate response to the attacks.

However, the government conclusions that the attacks had been planned and perpetrated by outside terrorists, were rejected from the very beginning by a number of scholars, scientists, engineers and architects experts in demolition who did their own research and study, while the corporate media served as an instrument to shut down these dissident voices. To this day, those critics continue to claim that the attacks were nothing more than an inside government job responding to a secret banking elite plan to advance their New World Order agenda and suppress the constitutional rights on the people to gain total control of the country and the masses.

The 9/11 commission served as the instrument for the government to create a false flag of alert – with the corporate media’s complicity – to create panic within the population, and therefore be able to pass any unconstitutional laws that restrict the fundamental rights of the people and to create a police state in the country.

Then came the final product that would guarantee that the President could do anything he wanted to control the people, overstepping the sovereignty of all of us, and so turning the United States of America into a straight forward dictatorship, like in the Soviet Union or China: the USA Patriot Act.

The USA PATRIOT Act, commonly known as the “Patriot Act”, is a statute enacted by the United States Government that President George W. Bush signed into law on October 26, 2001. The contrived acronym stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Public Law Pub.L. 107-56).

The Act increases the ability of law enforcement agencies to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial, and other records; eases restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States; expands the Secretary of the Treasury’s authority to regulate financial transactions, particularly those involving foreign individuals and entities; and enhances the discretion of law enforcement and immigration authorities in detaining and deporting immigrants suspected of terrorism-related acts. The act also expands the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the USA PATRIOT Act’s expanded law enforcement powers can be applied.

As I write this article, prominent celebrity, actor Charlie Sheen sent a letter to President Obama demanding a 20-minute meeting, entitled “20 Minutes With The President.” The letter was published exclusively on radio talk show host Alex Jones’ Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com websites this week.

According to Alex Jones, the letter cites evidence backed up by a substantial online bibliography. It proves the official story behind 9/11 is a fraud and that this conclusion was also reached by the majority of the 9/11 Commission members, a fact that mandates President Obama to reopen the investigation into the terrorist attacks.

In the words of Jones, Sheen expresses his hope that President Obama will follow through on his promises of change, accountability and government transparency by using his executive powers to re-examine 9/11, adding that he voted for Obama with the understanding that he would follow a different course to the Bush administration.

“However, as Sheen highlights in his letter, the course of Obama’s first year in office clearly indicates that he will do nothing to reverse policies crafted by the Bush regime, and in fact has sought to exceed outrages of the previous administration in areas such as warrantless wiretapping, rendition, detention without trial, and wars in the Middle East – all of which arrived as a consequence of 9/11,” Alex Jones says.

Sheen’s letter is a public declaration demanding the truth behind 9/11 as America approaches its eighth anniversary since the tragic events of that day. His questions are shared by a majority of victims’ family members, according to Bill Doyle, the representative of the largest 9/11 families group.

The letter focuses around the fact that no less than 60 per cent of the 9/11 commissioners have now publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack.

Sheen also presents a plethora of other evidence to illustrate how the official story is a fraud, including the revelations of whistle blowers like FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, who recently ­broke a Federal gag order to expose how Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were working for the U.S. government right up until the day of 9/11, Jones says.

Meanwhile, just a few days ago, President Barack Obama’s environmental adviser Van Jones, who became embroiled in a controversy over past inflammatory

statements, has resigned his White House job after what he calls a “vicious smear campaign against me.”

An article on American Online on Wednesday, Sept. 9, reported that the resignation of Jones, an administration official specializing in environmentally friendly “green jobs” with the White House Council on Environmental Quality was linked to efforts suggesting a government role in the 2001 terror attack.

According to the article, the matter surfaced after news reports of a derogatory comment Jones made in the past about Republicans, and separately, of Jones’s name appearing on a petition connected to the events surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. That 2004 petition had asked for congressional hearings and other investigations into whether high-level government officials had allowed the attacks to occur.

The poll results from the readers of the article overwhelmingly gave thumps up for approval to Jones comments. Of 88,176 votes, 79,244 approved it.

And my question is, why the media decided to cover this one?

I suggest and suspect that the media can see there is heat on the subject and that the public really wants to know, and want an investigation to reopen, but the government pressures the media to keep it low key.

My opinion is that an investigation can only help to bring the truth up and people should not feel threaten if they have nothing to hide.

spot_img

U.S. energy demand on the decline due to population migration

­

by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Michigan.— As Congress and the White House explore ways to encourage Americans to conserve energy, a new study by the University of Michigan shows that the average individual energy demand for heating and cooling has decreased over the past 50 years.

The reason? The country’s population shift to the more moderate and warm climates of the American West and Southwest, says Michael Sivak, a research professor at the U-M Transportation Research Institute.

The study, published in Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, found that the U.S. population shift has resulted in an 11 percent reduction in combined energy demand per person for heating and cooling since 1960.

“The relative increases in population in more moderate climates and, at the same time, in warmer climates imply a reduction in the combined energy per person—the shift to more moderate climates because of narrower ranges between winter and summer temperatures, and the shift to warmer climates because it is more energy-efficient to cool than to heat,” Sivak said.

Sivak performed three analyses based on 1960 and 2006 population data for the 50 largest metropolitan areas in the United States, which account for 54 percent of the U.S. population.

ALMAcool buildings [one heating (cooling) degree day occurs for each degree the average daily outdoor temperature is below (above) 65 degrees Fahrenheit]; 2) effective energy demand, based on heating and cooling degree days and incorporates the energy efficiencies of heatingThe three approaches included: 1) nominal energy demand, based only on “heating and cooling degree days”—units that relate to the amount of energy needed to heat and and cooling appliances; and 3) practical energy demand, based on degree days and appliance efficiencies, as well as the efficiencies of power-generating plants.

Based on climatological considerations only, Sivak found that while the energy demand for cooling (air conditioning) increased by 23 percent from 1960 to 2006, the demand for heating (which dominates the combined demand) decreased by 14 percent.

Overall, the nominal energy demand for both heating and cooling dropped 6 percent.

Using the effective energy demand approach, which accounts for energy used by furnaces, boilers, electric heaters and air conditioners, Sivak found a 12 percent reduction in energy demand since 1960.

The most comprehensive practical energy demand measure, which also incorporates the energy used by power plants, yielded the 11 percent figure reported above.

For more information on Sivak, visit ­www.umtri.umich.edu/people.php?personID=40.

spot_img

Protests over Obama health reform

by El Reportero’s news services

A socialist health care system is what many consider is the Obama plan,: and that was the theme of the most recent march against it in Washington. (photo by Wire services)A socialist health care system is what many consider is the Obama plan, and that was the theme of the most recent march against it in Washington. (photo by Wire services)

Protesters are angry at what they say is reckless public spending Tens of thousands of people have marched from the White House to Capitol Hill in Washington to protest against Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms.

The demonstrations came as the US president sought to boost support for his plans ­during a Minneapolis rally.

Addressing a crowd of 15,000, Mr Obama said he refused to accept no change on his top domestic priority.

He said he would not allow special interests to “use the same old tactics to keep things the way they are”.

“I will not accept the status quo. Not this time. Not now,” Mr Obama said in the democratic-leaning state, which has one of the country’s smallest numbers of uninsured residents.

‘Taxed to death’ But in Washington protesters attacked Mr Obama’s administration for what it called out-of-control spending – on healthcare, the stimulus packages and the bailout of the banking and car industries.

Mr Obama said he will not allow special interests to dominate the debate Healthcare in the US costs $2.2tn a year, or 16% of the country’s GDP – nearly double the OECD average.

The protestors insist that spending tax dollars on a government-run health insurance option will increase infl ation and lead the country to economic ruin.

“Born free, taxed to death,” one protester’s sign read while another, held up by an immigrant from Ukraine, said: “I had enough of socialism in the ­USSR.”

The march – co-ordinated by the conservative grouping Freedomworks, a grassroots movement calling for lower taxes and smaller government – brought together protesters from across different states.

‘Door open’ Days after urging Democrats and Republicans in Congress to work together, Mr Obama said his plan was open to ideas from across the political spectrum.

HEALTHCARE IN THE US

46 million uninsured, 25 million under-insured Healthcare costs represent 16% of GDP, almost twice OECD average Reform plans would require all Americans to get insurance Some propose public insurance option to compete with private insurers “If you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen. My door is always open,” he said. He warned, though, that he would not waste time with those who believe: “it’s better politics to kill this plan than improve it”.

It is estimated that some 46 million Americans do not have health insurance, and a further 25 million are thought to have inadequate insurance.

The healthcare plans currently being considered in Congress are all attempting to expand coverage, while also reforming the system to prevent spiralling costs. The bill would expand coverage to 97% of Americans, at a cost of some $600bn. (BBC New contributed to this report).

 

spot_img

Bachelet moves to end Pinochet-era copper funding for military

by the El Reportero

Michelle BacheletMichelle Bachelet

Chile’s President Michelle Bachelet sent a bill to congress this week calling time on an entrenched feature inherited from the Pinochet dictatorship: the appropriation for the military of 10 percent of copper export earnings.

The timing of the move is astute. It serves a dual purpose. On the domestic front, it should boost Eduardo Frei, the presidential candidate for the ruling Concertación, who is lagging in the polls with just three months until general elections.

This is because the opposition is split. Frei’s rival Sebastián Piñera favours annulling the law but the right-wing Unión Demócrata Independiente (UDI) has misgivings. On the regional front, improving the transparency of military spending is a clear gesture to the nascent defence council of the Union of South American Nations (Unasur), and a response to Peru.

Chávez ends ‘rogue states’ tour in Moscow Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez arrived in Moscow, Russia on Sept. 9 on the second last leg of a two-week foreign trip that took him to Libya, Algeria, Syria, Iran, Turkmenistan and Belarus – with a quick detour to Venice, Italy for a red carpet moment with the US fi lm director Oliver Stone – before a fi nal stop in Madrid, Spain, tomorrow (11 September).The tour has raised eyebrows; however much of it was noise.

The US, nonetheless, has ­watched warily as Chávez has strengthened political, economic and security ties with Iran and Russia in particular.

D’Escoto, Obama to talk Cuban Five Case General Assembly President Miguel D’Escoto will hold talks with U.S. President Barack Obama on the case of the fi ve Cuban antiterrorists imprisoned in the U.S.

The Nicaraguan diplomat will carry two letters signed by the relatives of the Cuban Five whose rights the U.S. overrides.

One letter protests the visas denied to Adriana Pérez and Olga Salanueva, the wives of Gerardo Hernández and René González, while the other will not be disclosed for the moment.

Guerrero’s mother Mirta González said the English copy sent to Obama “Letters of Love and Hope” shows the most humane side of the Five and hopes the gesture will help Obama become acquainted with the case.

spot_img

If Obama doesn’t act, Honduras ready to erupt

by Antonio González

President Obama is headed for a headache as hopes for a democratic resolution of the crisis in Honduras fade. If deposed President Manuel Zelaya, who was democratically elected in 2005, is not soon restored to power in this U.S.-dependent Central American country, a popular rebellion is inevitable. Civil war may ensue.

Latin American analysts fear more coups will be attempted by extremist forces in Guatemala, Ecuador and Bolivia, given Washington’s appearance of tacit acceptance of the coup.

The initial positive reaction by President Obama gathered by denouncing the coup has withered away as the coup government thumbs its nose at the world, closes down media outlets, and violently represses protesters.

However reluctantly, Washington, D.C., is at the center of this dilemma because of this country’s decades-old intimate ties with Honduras’s elite. At the recent summit between Mexico, the United States and Canada, Obama decried critics who advocate a more aggressive U.S. policy to restore President Zelaya to power. Obama stated, “…the same forces that decry U.S. intervention in Latin America now want us to intervene in Honduras.

They can’t have it both ways.

But classifying calls for this country to honor its own policies as intervention is wrong. No one wants U.S. troops or proxyforces to march in. The president’s critics are accurate in that he has only partially/belatedly enforced laws that mandate cutting off aid to countries that overthrow elected governments.

Laughably, our State Department still hasn’t declared that a coup occurred, leaving us isolated in the world with a ~half-coup” policy. The Organization of American States, the UN and European Union among others have taken clearer and tougher positions toward the two-month-old political-military dictatorship.

In practice, the soft Obama policy of backing Costa Rica President Oscar Arias’s feeble brokering efforts has given the coupist government breathing space to outlast Zelaya’s backers. Indeed, the de facto effect of Obama’s policy enables the coupist-government to play out the clock until November, when a blatant cooked “demonstration~ election will keep a rump government in power.

Already Brazil, Mexico Conand Colombia have stated they will not support any Honduran “government” that results from the ~demonstration” elections.

There are several implications if the situation continues to deteriorate. Fraying relations between the U.S. and Latin America will accelerate downward, even more so if coups are attempted in other countries.

The Honduran “street” is radicalizing. Before the coup, President Zelaya had low approval ratings. Today he is the hero of a growing movement that recently mobilized 300,000 protesters. If the coup continues, armed rebellion will begin. Dictatorship lead to massive refugee flows. Already there are reports of rebel training camps along the Honduras-Nicaragua border.

President Obama can ill afford another disappointment among U.S. Latinos now that he has postponed immigration reform till next year.

What explains President Obama’s misplay?

First, he was occupied with the domestic economic crisis and the Middle East.

Second, his initial, mostly-correct attitude towards the coup was soon modified by a State Department lukewarm toward President Zelaya.

In essence, U.S. reluctance to squeeze out the Honduran “coupists” reflects concerns over revolutionary trends in Latin America that deposed Zelaya agreed with.

This is a serious strategic mistake that will haunt Mr. Obama if not corrected soon. No matter what one thinks of the civic revolutions in places like Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and until recently Honduras, they are democratically elected, non-violent and popular, representing long-held yearnings for change.

Obama should engage with Latin America’s efforts to develop itself through home-grown, alternative models. No serious analysis can defend U.S.-inspired western economic policies that have so clearly failed to provide progress for Latin America’s 400 million strong population over the last generation.

independienteand together with close allies (Canada, Colombia, Mexico, Panama, Peru) issueHow can Obama right his course? Simple, He should receive President Zelaya publicly—something he has yet to do, State should declare a coup has occurred and immediately cut off all aid to the de-facto government, seize its U.S. assets, a public deadline to the coupists to step down from power now and receive amnesty.

If not, announce that sooner or later its conspirators will be tried for crimes for which they are patently guilty.

The coupists will turn tail in weeks, Hondurans and Latin Americans will breathe a sigh of relief and President Obama will be lauded for leading the pursuit of democracy and justice. Hispanic Link.

(Antonio Gonzalez is president of the William C. Velasquez Institute in Los Angeles.. Email: ­media@wcvi.org).

spot_img

Good-hearted young lady graduates with honors

Nicole Marie Santiago-BermúdezNicole Marie Santiago-Bermúdez

­The Santiago-Bermúdez family had more than joy this year, when their beautiful daughter, Nicole Marie Santiago, obtained her high school diploma during this year graduation at the San Francisco Christian School.

Nicole, an exceptional young lady who has endured family tragedies and has learned to overcome obstacles to continue advancing toward a university education, graduated with honors. She transferred to SFSU already and is majoring in Political Science.

The daughter of Israel Santiago, a native of Puerto Rico, and Adriana Bermúdez, from Nicaragua. Nicole started at the age of 12 caring for others. She used to travel to Nicaragua with her mother to provide inmates with food, clothing and bibles.

And lately, she worked helping elderly people, and volunteer at her local church helping kids from her the neighborhood, by taking them to the park and joining them in art projects. Right now she is part of the America Count tutor program, which tutors unprivileged kid.

spot_img

El Salvador’s romantic heart in S.F.

­by the El Reportero’s staff

Los CojolitesLos Cojolites

The creator of so many of the most romantic pieces lately, Álvaro Torres, brings his powerful voice to many of his fun in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Among his most successful hit include: Algo especial” (Something Special), “Acariciame” (Caress Me), “Un poquito de amor” (A Little Bit of Love), “La Unica” (The Only One), “Lo Que Se Dice Olvidar” Si Estuvieras Conmigo (If you were here with me) and “Nada se compara contigo” (Nothing Compares to You). The show include the participation of other artists.

On Saturday, Sept. 5, at 7 p.m. at Roccapulco Supper Club, 3140 Mission Street, SF. For more info call 415-821-3563.

What’s Washington doing about health care event

The League of Women Voters of San Francisco (LWVSF) and OWL of San Francisco (The Voice of Midlife and Older Women) invite you to participate in discussion about health care. The panel of speakers include experts in the health care issue.

On Thursday, Sept. 10, from 6-7:30 p.m., at the Koret Auditorium, SF Main Public Library, Lower Level. For more info call 415-989-8683.

A jewel of Veracruz in the Mission

Los Cojolites, a collective of soneros who currently work and live together in Jaltipan, Veracruz, Mexico, brings the rhytmn of Joroche with all its Veracrucian flavor.

Los Cojolites are a collective of soneros who currently work and live together in Jaltipan, Veracruz, Mexico.

The name “Los Cojolites” comes from a bird (Pencople purpurascens Wagler), a kind of pheasant that was vererated as a god of the trees by the ancient Nahuatl speaking people who lived around this area. The Cojolite Bird is especially known for the length of is song, a full uninterrupted five minutes of it, at the crack of dawn.

Friday, September 11th, at 8:00 p.m. Door opens at 7:00 p.m., at the Brava Theater, 2781 24th Street @ York St., San Francisco. More info call at 415-648 3349.

Mexical Classical star Horacio Franco in the Bay Area

Horacio Franco is now at days one of the most succesfull mexican classical musicians, his vast repertoire ranges from Renaissance, Baroque and contemporary works.

­Enjoying virtual rock star status he has broken the stereotype of the traditional

classical musician. He is particularly devoted to those living in the more vulnerable and unprotected sectors of societies everywhere.

A frequent soloist with virtually every Mexican orchestra, Horacio Franco also appears with distinguished ensembles around the globe, among them: American Composers Orchestra (Carnegie Hall debut, 1994), San Francisco’s Philharmonia Baroque Orchestra, City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra, Berliner Symphoniker, Hungary’s Franz Liszt Chamber Orchestra, Tokyo Solisten. Of special note is Horacio’s record of appearances over seven consecutive seasons with the famed Academy of St. Martin in the Fields.

spot_img