Sunday, March 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 6

2-week delay? Trump says 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada to take effect Feb. 1

by the El Reportero’s wire services

United States President Donald Trump said Monday that his administration could impose a 25 percent tariff on Mexican and Canadian exports to the U.S. on Feb. 1, almost two weeks later than he previously planned.

“We’re thinking in terms of 25 percent on Mexico and Canada because they’re allowing vast numbers of people … to come in and fentanyl to come in,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Monday night as he signed a batch of executive orders.

Asked when he would enact the tariffs, the newly-inaugurated president said Feb. 1.

“I think we’ll do it February first,” he said.

CNBC reported that there has been speculation that U.S. tariffs on Mexico and Canada exports “might be targeted at certain essential items rather than being more broad-based.”

In any case, they would violate the terms of the USMCA, the North American free trade pact that superseded NAFTA in 2020.

Tariffs would also have a potentially calamitous effect on the Mexican export industry — which sent goods worth more than US $466 billion to the U.S. in the first 11 months of last year — and the Mexican economy in general. Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis at Mexico’s Banco Base, said late last year that the Mexican economy would go into recession if Trump imposed a 25 percent tariff on Mexican exports to the United States.

In late November, Trump pledged to impose a 25 percent tariff on all Mexican and Canadian exports to the United States on the first day of his second term as U.S. president. He said at the time that the tariff would remain in effect “until such time as Drugs, in particular Fentanyl, and all Illegal Aliens stop this Invasion of our Country!”

President Claudia Sheinbaum subsequently said that Mexico would impose a 25 percent retaliatory tariff on U.S. exports to Mexico if Trump followed through on his tariff threat. She said last week that her government would seek to avert the proposed tariff through dialogue with the Trump administration.

Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said in November that Mexico would be shooting itself in the foot if it imposed a 25 percent tariff on Mexican exports, asserting that such a duty would have an adverse impact on consumers in the United States and cause the loss of “around 400,000 jobs” in the U.S. Last week, he expressed confidence that Mexico would be able to stave off the proposed tariff.

“I guarantee you we’re going to find [a way out],” Ebrard said.

While Trump’s stated reason for imposing tariffs on the United States’ North American trade partners is the entry of migrants and drugs from Mexico and Canada, the U.S. president also dislikes the fact that the U.S. has trade deficits with its two neighbors.

“We’re subsidizing Canada to the tune of over $100 billion a year. We’re subsidizing Mexico for almost $300 billion,” he said in December, significantly exaggerating the United States’ trade deficits with both countries.

“We shouldn’t be — why are we subsidizing these countries? If we’re going to subsidize them, let them become a state. We’re subsidizing Mexico and we’re subsidizing Canada and we’re subsidizing many countries all over the world,” Trump said.

Trump issues ‘America First Trade Policy’ memo

While he didn’t keep his promise to impose tariffs on Mexican exports on the first day of his presidency, Trump did issue an “American First Trade Policy” memorandum that paves the way for the implementation of protectionist measures.

The memo said that “the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the United States Trade Representative, shall investigate the causes of our country’s large and persistent annual trade deficits in goods, as well as the economic and national security implications and risks resulting from such deficits, and recommend appropriate measures, such as a global supplemental tariff or other policies, to remedy such deficits.”

It also said that “the United States Trade Representative, in consultation with the heads of other relevant executive departments and agencies, shall assess the impact of the USMCA on American workers, farmers, ranchers, service providers, and other businesses and make recommendations regarding the United States’ participation in the agreement.”

The USMCA is up for review in 2026, and Trump has pledged to renegotiate the pact.

“I’ll … seek strong new protections against transshipment, so that China and other countries cannot smuggle their products and auto parts into the United States tax free through Mexico to the detriment of our workers and our supply chains,” he said in October.

In his inauguration speech in the United States Capitol Rotunda, Trump said he would “immediately begin the overhaul of our trade system to protect American workers and families.”

“Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens. For this purpose, we are establishing the External Revenue Service to collect all tariffs, duties and revenues. It will be massive amounts of money pouring into our treasury coming from foreign sources,” he said.

spot_img

The hidden dangers of giving cellphones to children at an early age

por Marvin Ramírez

In today’s digital age, the sight of a child engrossed in a cellphone screen has become all too common. Parents, often with good intentions, provide their children with these devices to entertain, educate, or stay connected. However, the consequences of introducing young minds to cellphones too early are profound and alarming. These devices, combined with the content propagated by social media giants, have become powerful tools that can capture and shape young minds, often to the detriment of their culture, values, and behavior. This issue is particularly concerning for children of immigrant families, whose parents may lack fluency in English and are unaware of the subtle yet pervasive influence these platforms wield.

Social media companies are experts in capturing attention. Their platforms are designed to be addictive, employing algorithms that track user behavior and serve content specifically tailored to hold their interest. For young children, whose brains are still developing, this can have dire consequences. These platforms expose them to a constant stream of content that is often superficial, materialistic, or culturally alien, subtly reshaping their worldview. Children are especially vulnerable because they lack the critical thinking skills needed to discern harmful or misleading information from positive and constructive material.

The cultural erosion caused by early exposure to cellphones and social media is a significant concern. Many children of immigrant families grow up in households where cultural traditions, values, and languages are cherished and passed down through generations. However, when these children spend hours scrolling through social media, they are inundated with content that often contradicts or undermines their familial and cultural values. For instance, a child from a family that emphasizes respect for elders and community-oriented living may be drawn to social media influencers promoting individualism and self-centered lifestyles. Over time, this repeated exposure can lead to a disconnection from their heritage and the values their parents worked so hard to instill.

Parental unawareness exacerbates the problem. Immigrant parents, particularly those who do not command the English language, often struggle to monitor the content their children consume. Many assume that digital devices and platforms are harmless or even beneficial, unaware that their children are being exposed to inappropriate content or ideologies that may conflict with their family’s values. Without understanding the language or nuances of the content, these parents cannot guide or shield their children effectively.

Moreover, social media platforms often promote behaviors and ideals that deviate from what most parents consider “good behavior.” For example, children are frequently exposed to trends that glorify risky or disrespectful behavior, whether through viral challenges, videos, or memes. These trends can normalize actions that conflict with the moral and ethical lessons parents strive to teach. In extreme cases, such exposure can lead to behavioral issues, such as defiance, reduced empathy, or a lack of respect for authority figures.

The role of social media companies in this phenomenon cannot be overstated. These corporations invest billions of dollars in creating content and features that ensure users, including children, remain hooked. From autoplay videos to endless scrolling, these features are designed to maximize screen time. The longer children stay on these platforms, the more data these companies collect, enabling them to refine their algorithms further. This creates a vicious cycle: the more children engage, the more tailored and captivating the content becomes, pulling them deeper into the digital world and further away from their families.

The consequences of this disconnection are not merely cultural but also psychological and emotional. Studies have shown that excessive screen time and exposure to social media can lead to issues such as anxiety, depression, and poor self-esteem. Young children, who are particularly impressionable, may begin to compare themselves to the unrealistic standards often portrayed online. This can result in feelings of inadequacy or a distorted sense of self-worth. Additionally, the constant stimulation provided by cellphones and social media can impact attention spans and hinder the development of essential social skills.

Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach. First, parents need to become more aware of the content their children are consuming and the potential dangers it poses. For immigrant families, this may involve seeking resources or community support to better understand the digital landscape. Schools and community organizations can play a crucial role in educating parents about digital literacy and providing tools to monitor and guide their children’s online activities.

Second, parents should establish boundaries around cellphone and social media use. Setting limits on screen time and encouraging alternative activities, such as reading, outdoor play, or family bonding, can help reduce children’s reliance on digital devices. Creating “device-free” zones or times, such as during meals or before bedtime, can also foster healthier habits and stronger family connections.

Finally, there is a need for greater accountability from social media companies. These platforms must take responsibility for the content they promote and the impact it has on young users. Governments and advocacy groups should push for stricter regulations to ensure that these companies prioritize the well-being of children over profits. This could include measures such as age-appropriate content filters, more robust parental controls, and transparency in how algorithms operate.

The pervasive influence of cellphones and social media on young minds is a modern challenge that demands urgent attention. Parents, educators, and policymakers must work together to protect children from the harmful effects of early exposure to these technologies. By fostering awareness, setting boundaries, and holding social media companies accountable, we can help preserve the cultural values, emotional well-being, and positive behaviors that are essential for children to thrive.

spot_img

Predictions for 2025: AI advancement, rejection of globalism and climate alarmism

2025 will likely see rapid advancements in AI, a wholescale retreat from those pushing the ‘green’ climate agenda, and an opportunity for those who question mainstream narratives to freely come together against globalism

by James Corbett

(The Corbett Report) — It’s January and the New Year is upon us.

It’s customary at this time of year for those of us pundits and pontificators who make our living scanning the news feeds to make our predictions for the coming year, so – why not? – I’ll go ahead and throw my hat in the ring, too.

But this year I’m going to do something a little different: I’m going to make one “sure-bet” prediction, one “maybe possible” prediction and one “it’s not technically impossible!” aspirational prediction.

Let’s go!

Sure-bet prediction: you AIn’t seen nothin’ yet!

Oh, sure, for my 100 percent guaranteed-to-happen sure-bet prediction I could go with some banal non-prediction wherein I state an obvious fact that everyone agrees with.

“I predict that politicians will lie this year!”

“I predict the globalists will push technocracy on the public!”

“I predict that water will be wet, the sun will rise every morning, and the pope will defecate in the woods … or bears will be Catholic. Or something like that!”

But what would be the fun in that?

No, my sure-bet prediction for 2025 is slightly less boring than those truisms, but no less certain to take place. I predict that 2025 will be the Year of AI.

Right off the bat, you might have a couple of objections to this prediction. You might insist on rehashing the old “toasters don’t have a soul!” argument, for example, but that’s not what I’m talking about here. Or you might object that 2024 was the year of AI (or at least the year of AI hype). But if you think that, all I can say is: you AIn’t seen nothing yet! (<–see what I did there?)

As we head into the New Year, it has now become a full-time job just keeping track of the slew of AI stories flooding the newswires.

Have you heard of OnionGPT, the new, uncensored, “dark web” AI chatbot that’s teaching how to cook meth (and Lord knows what else!) to (gasp!) five thousand people per day?

Did you see the story about Meta admitting they’ve been secretly seeding their social media platforms with fake, AI-generated characters (complete with elaborate backstories and fictitious life experiences) for years now?

Did you catch the announcement that OpenAI is partnering with Anduril to create new AI weapons systems for the incoming Trump/Thiel/Musk administration?

Have you read lame duck Biden’s “Memorandum on Advancing the United States’ Leadership in Artificial Intelligence“?

Did you catch NIST’s announcement of its new task force on AI and national security?

Are you aware of xAI’s newly launched “Colossus” data center, currently consisting of an impressive 100,000 GPUs and about to be upgraded to a truly mind-boggling 1,000,000 GPUs, drawing an equally mind-boggling 1.5 gigawatts of power?

Are you familiar with the latest research demonstrating that, yes, large language models are capable of strategically lying in order to achieve their goals, even pretending to comply with constraints placed upon them by their human creators while secretly plotting to defy those constraints?

Well, if you’re not familiar with all that info, you likely will be soon. The AI news is going to be well-nigh inescapable in the coming year.

Now, by all means, cross your arms, plug your ears, scream it’s all fake and insist that nothing at all is happening here. Try to convince everyone that AI is just the next big hype and that after the bust we’ll realize AI’s “impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.” (Hmmm, where have I heard that before?)

But, like it or not, 2025 is going to be a year of AI mania, and it’s only going to accelerate from here.

Maybe possible prediction: Greenies in retreat?

As I tried to stress in my Story of the Year for 2024 (see New World Next Year 2025), things are not all smooth sailing for the would-be world controllers. Last year we saw growing awareness of (and pushback against) the globalist agenda, as reflected in a sea change in public opinion on a number of topics that are key to the conspirators’ plans.

To take one example, 2024 saw the fall from grace of former globalist darlings like Justin Trudeau, the rise of populist movements around the globe, and the near-absence from the public stage of carnival barkers like Klaus Schwab or idiot non-savants like Bill Gates.

To take another example, 2024 saw the failure of the biosecurity bigwigs and their Big Pharma accomplices at the WHO to pass their coveted pandemic treaty.

But perhaps the most startling sea change of all occurred in the discourse around the globalist’s favourite bogeyman (or is that “favourite ManBearPig“?), the “climate emergency” myth.

No one who has been even semi-conscious for the past two decades could fail to notice that the globalists have been putting a lot of their eggs in the ManBearPig basket, banking on the public to be so frightened of the angry weather gods that they would beg to be locked down in their Absolute Zero cities and their 15-Minute cities.

But despite an unrelenting, decades-long propaganda campaign, the public are not only less afraid of the “end of the world in 100 years” scare story than they were before, they’re watching the multi-trillion-dollar climate swindle fall apart in front of their very eyes.

First there was the COP flop, with the U.N.’s annual exercise in global government beta testing devolving into a farce so pathetic that even its staunchest supporters denounced it as a “meaningless ritual” and a “total waste of time.”

Then came the news that the $100 trillion-dollar takeover of the global economy otherwise known as the “net zero transition” is on its deathbed. In a stunning turnaround, all six of the “Big 6” U.S. banks have left the Net-Zero Banking Alliance in recent months, and BlackRock has just announced that it’s leaving the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, too.

Heck, even Big Oil is backtracking on their unicorn fart green economy promises, withv BP, Shell, Equinor, and other oil-igarch companies quietly scaling back on their investments in renewables in favour of good ol’ oil and gas.

n the name of the climate crisis, more people than ever are realizing that these authoritarian measures are not about saving the earth at all. The ginned-up “climate emergency” was never about saving the earth.

U.K. climate groups are declaring this “The Beginning of the End” of the net zero agenda, and climate realists are finally seeing light at the end of the tunnel.

Now, let’s not kid ourselves here: the “climate emergency” myth that the globalists have been propagandizing us with for decades is not going away. They’re not going to simply admit reality, declare the emergency over, and let you go on with your life as usual.

Yes, companies are backing away from public pledges of fealty to the ESG cult and sacrifices to the net zero weather gods, but that doesn’t mean they’re going to stop actually doing these things. They’re just going to be more low-key about it and hope the public doesn’t find out.

But if we stop at that level of analysis – namely, “they’re going to keep doing it so nothing’s changed!” – then we miss the real point here.

The point is that for the first time in decades, people are starting to see this “sustainable development” scam for what it really is: an attempt by the entitled few to siphon off yet more of the world’s wealth and resources for themselves and to reduce the rest of us to absolute poverty.

And, for the first time in decades, the false prophets of the global warming religion aren’t able to frighten the public with their ManBearPig scare story or entice trendy virtue signalers to sterilize themselves (or kill themselves) to save the earth.

No, the climate cultists are not down for the count, but they can no longer rely on the public to believe them when they cry wolf. Let me reiterate for the permanently pessimistic and the hard-of-thinking: this means we are winning, not losing.

‘It’s not technically impossible!’ aspirational prediction: The conspiracy realist space actually unites

I have a dream that one day conspiracy realists will rise up and live out the true meaning of the creed: “The truth is out there.”

I have a dream that one day in the comment section of alt media websites, the “Trump is our saviour!” people and the “Lesser-of-two-evils” voters and the flat-earthers and the no-planers and the no-virusers and the commies and the people who insist on turning every single online discussion into a religious argument will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood and realize we are all in this together against the oligarchs.

I have a dream that my subscribers will one day live in a world where they will not be judged by their disobedience to the state but by the content of their character.

I have a dream today!

I have a dream that one day every YouTube alternative shall be exalted, and every mainstream media website and every censoring social media platform shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight; “and the value of #SolutionsWatch shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.”

This is our hope, and this is the faith that I go back to the internet with.

With this faith, we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our online spaces into a beautiful symphony of humanity. With this faith, we will be able to work together, to grow vegetables together, to struggle together, to avoid vaccine mandates together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.

Let freedom ring from people gathering in the actual, real, non-digital physical world (which, yes, still does exist!).

From every mountainside, let freedom ring!

And when this happens, and when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all conspiracy enthusiasts, amateur investigators, solutions-oriented activists, and Corbett Report members will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual:

Free at last! Free at last!

Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!

… Well, a guy can dream, can’t he?

spot_img

Judge halts Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, citing constitutional violations  

by the El Reportero’s staff

President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship for children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants has faced a significant legal setback. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge John Coughenour temporarily blocked the order, siding with a lawsuit filed by Arizona, Illinois, Oregon, and Washington, which challenges its constitutionality. The lawsuit is one of five brought by 22 states following the executive action, and this ruling marks the first significant court decision on the matter.

Trump’s Jan. 20, 2025, executive order sought to invalidate birthright citizenship, which has been guaranteed by the 14th Amendment for over 150 years. The order argued that the 14th Amendment never intended to extend citizenship to children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants. The directive required federal agencies to deny citizenship documents to children of parents who are “unlawfully present” or hold temporary legal status in the U.S.

However, Judge Coughenour, appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, called the order “blatantly unconstitutional,” expressing disbelief at its legal foundation. He said, “I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one,” and criticized the lack of legal justification for the order.

The judge’s ruling halts the policy, which was scheduled to take effect in February. Legal experts argue that the president cannot unilaterally alter constitutional rights through executive orders. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) also challenged the order, joining other critics who view it as a violation of the 14th Amendment’s guarantees of equal protection and due process.

In response to the ruling, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said the administration would appeal the decision, reaffirming Trump’s commitment to pursuing a broader immigration policy overhaul. “This is just the beginning,” she stated, as Trump’s administration continues its push for stricter immigration controls.

The executive order is part of a wider set of immigration reforms promised by Trump, including measures such as reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy, ending “catch and release,” and accelerating the construction of a physical border wall. Trump also intends to declare a national emergency at the border, deploying armed forces and building barriers to prevent illegal immigration.

Transgender Policy Executive Order Faces Criticism and Legal Challenges

In addition to his immigration agenda, Trump signed another controversial executive order that targets transgender policies within the federal government. On Jan. 20, 2025, the president signed the Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government order, which redefines gender as strictly male or female based on biological sex. It also removes transgender-related policies from federal agencies.

The order mandates that federal documents, including passports and Social Security records, reflect individuals’ biological sex rather than self-identified gender. It also restricts federal funding for transgender medical services, including those for minors. These measures have provoked strong backlash from civil rights organizations, including the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and the ACLU.

Opponents argue that the order undermines the rights of transgender people and could foster widespread discrimination. Kelley Robinson, President of the HRC, described the order as “a direct attack on the rights and dignity of transgender people.” Maya Wiley, of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, added that it “further marginalizes already vulnerable communities.”

One of the key provisions of the order is its prohibition on transgender medical treatments for minors, such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy. The Trump administration justifies this as a way to protect children from medical procedures that may have irreversible consequences. Public opinion polls show that a significant portion of Americans supports these measures, with 71% opposing transgender medical treatments for minors.

Supporters of the order, including detransitioned individuals and advocates of “biological sex” definitions, see it as a necessary step to safeguard women’s sports and protect minors from pressures to transition. Critics, however, warn that the order will marginalize transgender people, especially those who have already transitioned, and harm inclusivity in society.

Legal experts suggest that Trump’s executive order on transgender issues is also likely to face legal challenges. Similar to the birthright citizenship order, it may be delayed pending court rulings. The potential legal battles signal a broader struggle over federal policies concerning gender identity and civil rights.

A Controversial Presidency, Facing Legal Scrutiny

Both executive orders—on birthright citizenship and transgender issues—reflect the deep political divisions within American society on questions of immigration and transgender rights. While Trump continues to push forward with his agenda, his policies face intense legal scrutiny, and both are expected to be challenged in court.

Legal experts broadly agree that the president lacks the authority to unilaterally alter constitutional provisions like the 14th Amendment, which guarantees birthright citizenship, or redefine gender identity in federal law. As the lawsuits unfold, these executive actions are expected to remain at the center of national debates over constitutional interpretation, civil rights, and the future of U.S. immigration and gender policies.

Despite these hurdles, Trump’s administration has shown no signs of backing down. His legal team has vowed to appeal the temporary block on the birthright citizenship order, and his continued push for tougher immigration laws signals that the fight is far from over. The executive order on transgender rights also promises to ignite further legal battles, as courts will ultimately decide whether the president can redefine gender for federal purposes.

As the legal challenges play out, both policies remain controversial. Proponents view them as steps toward enforcing “traditional” values, while critics see them as overreaches that violate fundamental rights. What is clear, however, is that Trump’s presidency is marked by aggressive attempts to reshape American law through executive power, with significant legal and social consequences that will likely endure long after the end of his term.

spot_img

Immigrants, documented and undocumented, will rebuild LA after the fires

El complejo de apartamentos Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates destruido por el incendio Palisades en el vecindario Pacific Palisades de Los Ángeles, el jueves 16 de enero de 2025. (Foto AP/Damian Dovarganes). The Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates apartment complex destroyed by the Palisades Fire in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood of Los Angeles, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025.

A majority of essential workers in construction and disaster cleanup, critical to rebuilding communities destroyed by the LA fires, are immigrants. Many are undocumented

by Pilar Marrero

Ethnic Media Services

Even as the devastating fires in Los Angeles continue to burn, leaving a trail of destruction, stories are emerging about the role immigrants are playing in recovery efforts from what is likely the worst disaster in California history.

Some are calling them, “second responders.”

“The guys (day laborers) are already out helping because there aren’t enough city personnel,” says Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of LA (CHIRLA). “They are going through the streets, helping people cut down their trees and get them off the roads.”

But Salas and others worry about the exploitation many of these workers face.

“It’s something they always go through,” she notes. “They go, clean up, and rebuild, and all of a sudden, it’s no pay, entry into toxic zones with no protection, and contractors hiring subcontractors and day laborers with no guarantees.”

Donald Trump’s return to the White House on January 20 heightens such fears, with his promise of mass deportations targeting unauthorized migrants increasing their sense of vulnerability.

“I think people might not show up for jobs in Los Angeles for fear of being raided,” said Jennie Murray of the National Immigration Forum, which brings together business owners and law enforcement leaders sympathetic to the need for comprehensive immigration reform.

A majority of essential workers in construction and disaster cleanup, critical to recovery in communities like Pacific Palisades, Altadena, and elsewhere affected by the fires, are immigrants. Many are undocumented or have temporary permission under programs like TPS and DACA, programs the new administration is threatening to eliminate.

“These are the people who are rebuilding the United States after hurricanes, floods, and fires; the vast majority are immigrants, and they are highly vulnerable, and they are highly exploited while doing that work,” explained activist Saket Soni of Resilient Workforce in an 2023 interview with NPR.

Post-disaster recovery industry

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the George W. Bush administration temporarily suspended sanctions on employers who hired undocumented immigrants in order to facilitate rebuilding efforts in affected areas.

Since then, natural disasters linked to climate change have multiplied, with immigrant workers the backbone of what has become a multi-billion-dollar, post-disaster recovery industry financed by both the government and insurance companies.

Experts say fear of detention and deportation contributes to labor abuses, and the overall health and safety of these workers.

Nick Theodore with the Department of Urban Planning and Policy at the University of Illinois Chicago surveyed workers during rebuilding in New Orleans after Hurricane IDA in 2021. He found that 40 percent of workers came to NOLA after the hurricane from other areas of the U.S., so-called “storm chasers,” a workforce flexibility unique to migrant laborers and vital to recovery efforts.

Yet Theodore’s survey also found numerous instances of labor violations and wage theft. Many workers reported various physical effects following cleanup operations after the disaster, which exposed responders to a range of toxic substances.

‘A perfect storm’

From her home on the Pasadena-Altadena border, Salas worries about what lies ahead.

“Here in California, we have been through many natural and weather disasters and, in every situation, the ones who go in and rebuild are almost always Latino immigrants.”

But they don’t just rebuild. Latinos are also victims of this disaster. Salas and nearly 300 members of her family live near the fires.

“My niece lost her house, so did my cousin’s husband’s dad, my best friend’s house burned down, and so did my cousin’s house,” Salas recounts. “My mother was evacuated, and several family members were left without work because they either worked as domestic workers or one of my mother’s sisters worked in a place where they took care of old people that also burned down. My sister is a teacher in a school that no longer exists.”

Salas’ parents were the first in her family to arrive from El Salvador in the 1970s. They all settled in northwest Pasadena, “One of the few places where African Americans and Latinos could buy homes.”

Data from the UCLA Institute for Public Policy and Politics estimates that more than 74,000 Latinos live within evacuation and warning zones, with one-in-four displaced or at risk of being displaced in Los Angeles County. Longstanding health and economic disparities further complicate their recovery. Many have no insurance.

“Right now, we are talking with the California Labor Commissioner about increasing protections for undocumented immigrants and immigrant workers in general,” said Salas. “For an unscrupulous employer, the easiest thing to do is say, ‘I’m going to call immigration; who are you going to complain to?’”

With Los Angeles scheduled to host the 2028 Olympics, on top of the already massive scale of reconstruction needed, concerns are mounting over the rising costs for labor and the potential for abuse.

“These fires are happening at a time when labor availability is low, when there are not enough workers for our industries in general, not just construction,” said Murray of National Immigration Forum.

She also warned of spillover effects on the insurance industry, with higher construction costs driving up the costs of coverage, “because these workers will be unavailable or afraid to move to the places where they are needed.”

“It’s a perfect storm,” she said.

spot_img

Latino and Hispanic-owned small businesses more optimistic about 2025 economic outlook  

Sponsored by JPMorganChase

As we enter 2025, small business owners are finding a silver lining amidst challenges. The latest JPMorganChase’s 2025 Business Leaders Outlook Survey reveals a wave of optimism sweeping through the sector. More than 70% of small business owners express confidence, feeling “optimistic” or “very optimistic” about both their industry’s and their company’s performance in the coming year.

Notably, diverse business owners are showing greater optimism about the economic landscape at local, national, and global levels. Latino and Hispanic small business owners plan to rely more on all types of funding for their businesses compared to all business owners this year.

Here are five key findings from this year’s survey.

  • Economic optimism grows each year…

More than half of Latino and Hispanic small business owners expressed optimism about the state of the local, national and global economy. Close to 80% had the same optimism about their industry’s performance or their own company’s performance.

  • …but some concerns exist

While small businesses seem to have left the economic uncertainty of the pandemic years behind, diverse-owned businesses remain more cautious about the future. Interestingly, they are still more likely to anticipate a recession in 2025 compared to the broader business community. However, less than a third of diverse-owned businesses expect an economic downturn – among Latino and Hispanic-owned small businesses, 32% said “yes” to expectations of a recession in 2025. This cautious optimism reflects a nuanced perspective, balancing resilience with a watchful eye on potential economic shifts.

  • Inflation is top concern, but cybersecurity challenges are growing

As inflation remains the top challenge for business owners going into 2025, Latino and Hispanic business owners are particularly attuned to the threat of cybersecurity, identifying it as their second-biggest challenge. This concern surpasses the “uncertainty of economic conditions,” which ranks second among the broader community. Across all groups, rising taxes emerge as the third most pressing issue. This highlights a distinct focus among diverse business owners on the importance of protecting their operations from any threats.

  • Finding funding

Diverse-owned businesses are strategically positioning themselves to tap into a variety of funding sources more than small business overall. Latino and Hispanic-owned businesses, for instance, notably showed a preference for business credit cards (61%) and loans from traditional banks/credit unions (43%). A significant majority of Latino and Hispanic-owned businesses (76%) are also more likely than the overall business respondents (55%) to explore online lending this year.

  • Ambitious hiring plans amid talent challenges

Diverse-owned businesses are setting ambitious hiring goals for 2025. Among Latino and Hispanic-owned businesses, 63% foresee an increase in full-time hires and 52% anticipated more part-time hires. This contrasts with 46% of all respondents expecting full-time hiring increases and just 38% planning for part-time hires.

However, these businesses face significant challenges in finding the right candidates. A vast majority (91%) of Latino and Hispanic-owned businesses express concerns around recruitment. Latino and Hispanic-owned businesses cite the challenge of opening new locations (34%).

This response is echoed across the board, with 79% of all respondents worried about finding suitable candidates.

The bottom line

Economic optimism is on the rise among diverse-owned small business owners, with Latino and Hispanic-owned small businesses having greater confidence in the local, national and global economic outlook than survey responses overall.

Despite some apprehensions about a potential recession and recruitment challenges, diverse-owned small businesses are determined to expand their workforce and secure funding to fuel growth. This determination underscores their optimism for 2025 and their readiness to make strategic moves to scale their operations.

For informational/educational purposes only: Views and strategies described in this article or provided via links may not be appropriate for everyone and are not intended as specific advice/recommendation for any business. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries do not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The material is not intended to provide legal, tax, or financial advice or to indicate the availability or suitability of any JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. product or service. You should carefully consider your needs and objectives before making any decisions and consult the appropriate professional(s). Outlooks and past performance are not guarantees of future results. JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates are not responsible for, and do not provide or endorse third party products, services, or other content.

Deposit products provided by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Opportunity Lender.

 © 2025 JPMorgan Chase & Co.

spot_img

Omar Sosa & Seckou Keita perform in concert

by Magdy Zara

Cuban composer and pianist Omar Sosa is one of the most versatile jazz artists on the scene today and performs in a masterful concert alongside Seckou Keita who has been praised as “one of the best exponents of the kora.”

Sosa fuses a wide range of jazz, world music and electronic elements with his native Afro-Cuban roots to create a fresh and original urban sound, all with a Latin jazz heart, while Keita has adapted his 22-string African harp to modern jazz.

Cuba and Senegal are the birthplaces of both artists who met in 2012 and debuted with their first album (Transparent Water) in 2017.

Sosa has released more than 30 albums during his incredible career that has included nominations for seven GRAMMY or Latin GRAMMY awards; Keita has released 11 albums as a leader and co-leader and through this work, has won numerous awards, including three Songlines Music Awards and several BBC Awards.

There will be two performances on Jan. 17 and 18, 2025, starting at 7 p.m., at The Freight, located at 2020 Addison Street, Berkeley.

MLK’s Birthday commemorated with 2025 Music Festival

The Martin Luther King Jr. Community Foundation of Northern California, for fifteen consecutive years, has scheduled activities to commemorate the birthday of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., which on this occasion began on January 13.

As part of the programming, the 2025 MLK Music Festival is scheduled to take place, which is a spectacular blend of art, culture and unity that takes center stage during the annual MLK Day celebrations in NorCal, in association with Purple Cherry Productions, this festival brings acclaimed artists to the iconic Great Lawn of San Francisco’s Yerba Buena Gardens.

The interfaith commemoration will begin at 11:45 a.m., on the Great Lawn at Yerba Buena Gardens, led by the San Francisco Interfaith Council with music by the Glide Ensemble.

The event will take place this Monday, Jan. 20, starting at 12:00 noon, on the

Great Lawn, Yerba Buena Gardens located on Mission St. between 3rd and 4th Streets in San Francisco.

Charo performs at the Montalvo Arts Center

You can’t miss the chance to see Charo perform live. She has twice been voted “Best Flamenco Guitarist” by Guitar Magazine.

Charo’s cheerful personality and signature “cuchi cuchi” expression have endeared her to fans around the world. On television, she showcased her comedic talents on Jane the Virgin, played the Queen of England on SyFy’s Sharknado 5, and introduced viewers to her crazy family and Beverly Hills estate on a hilarious episode of ABC’s Celebrity Wife Swap.

The show will be on Friday, Jan. 31 at 7:30 p.m., on the Carriage House stage at the Montalvo Arts Center, located at 15400 Montalvo Rd, Saratoga. Tickets are $107.

spot_img

National Conservatory of Music: The origin of Mexico’s musical epicenter

The history and significance of the National Conservatory of Music make it a national pride. Discover more about the legacy of this institution

by México Desconocido

Founded in the mid-19th century, the National Conservatory of Music stands as one of Mexico’s most emblematic artistic institutions. Throughout its history, it has shaped the country’s musical landscape, becoming a bastion of music education and culture.
This institution has not only trained some of Mexico’s greatest composers and performers but has also reflected the historical and social context that accompanied its development.

When Was the National Conservatory of Music Founded?

The Historical Context of Its Foundation

During the Second Mexican Empire, Mexico experienced a period of intense transformation. Under the reign of Maximilian of Habsburg, European influence deeply impacted various areas, including education and the arts.
This period was pivotal for the establishment of cultural institutions like the National Conservatory of Music. In 1866, despite political and social tensions, the country sought to modernize, and music became a vehicle for expression and social cohesion.

Exact Foundation Date and Early Years

January 14, 1866, marks the official founding of the National Conservatory of Music, initiated by the Mexican Philharmonic Society.
The institution opened its doors a few months later, on July 1 of the same year, in a house that previously housed the music academy of Father Agustín Caballero, who became its first director. From the beginning, the conservatory’s mission was clear: to train skilled musicians and elevate the nation’s artistic standards.

Who Founded the National Conservatory of Music?

The Figures Behind Its Creation

The creation of the National Conservatory of Music was not the work of a single individual but a group of visionaries led by pianist Tomás León and renowned composer Melesio Morales.
Their efforts were supported by the Mexican Philharmonic Society, which also received backing from figures like Ángela Peralta, who symbolized the country’s emerging talent. The participation of European musicians, including Franz Liszt, highlighted the international significance of the project, with Liszt even offering financial and moral support.

European Influence on Mexico’s Music Education

The Mexican conservatory model was deeply inspired by European music academies, particularly Italian and French institutions.
This influence was evident in its initial pedagogy and repertoire, which emphasized Italian opera and European composition techniques. Over time, this approach adapted to Mexico’s cultural reality, incorporating elements of traditional Mexican music.

Evolution of the National Conservatory of Music

From the 19th to the 21st Century

Throughout its history, the National Conservatory of Music has undergone multiple transformations.

From the Ex-University to the Tabacalera Mexicana Property (1907)

The conservatory’s first location was in the Ex-University building, provided by Benito Juárez’s government to the Mexican Philharmonic Society.
However, by 1907, the structure was in such poor condition that it had to be demolished. This forced the conservatory to relocate to a mansion in the Tabacalera Mexicana area, near the current San Carlos Museum.
Despite this move, the facilities were inadequate for the institution’s needs, lacking a theater and being situated on the outskirts of the city. Major performances were held at the rented Teatro Abreu.

The Moneda Street Mansion (1912–1949)

In 1912, the conservatory moved to a mansion at 14 and 16 Moneda Street, across from the National Museum. While this location offered more space, it wasn’t designed as a music school.
It lacked proper facilities like a concert hall, so important events were held in rented spaces or in the National Museum’s courtyards. During the Mexican Revolution, the conservatory faced numerous challenges. In 1915, its staff was dismissed by order of the Constitutional Army, though the Aguascalientes Convention reinstated them three months later.

Despite these difficulties, the conservatory became a cornerstone of national culture. In the following decades, it played a key role in training musicians who led the Revolutionary Nationalism movement, an artistic trend that defined Mexico’s post-Revolution cultural identity.

The Move to Polanco (1949)

The need for suitable facilities for music education finally led to the construction of a modern campus in Polanco. Designed by Mario Pani and located at 582 Presidente Masaryk Avenue, the new site was inaugurated in 1949, marking the start of a new era for the conservatory. This building, specifically conceived as a music school, remains its home to this day.

What Makes the National Conservatory of Music an Icon?

Facilities and Academic Programs

Located in Mexico City, the conservatory features modern facilities designed to meet the needs of students and faculty.
Its programs range from classical to contemporary music, offering specialties such as composition, conducting, performance, and ethnomusicology.

Educational Offerings

The conservatory provides robust musical training across three levels:

  • Professional Technical Level: Offers 20 careers, including voice, piano, violin, flute, and trumpet.
  • Associate Professional Level: Advanced training in performance, with degree options for 20 careers, excluding choral conducting.
  • Bachelor’s Degree Level: Covers 23 careers, including performance, research, composition, and teaching, preparing musicians to excel as soloists, educators, or members of orchestras and ensembles.

Spaces and Resources
The Conservatory features facilities designed to foster the learning and creativity of its students. Highlights include:
• The Candelario Huízar Library, housing a unique collection of Mexican manuscripts and scores from the 19th and 20th centuries.
• The Historical Archive and Reserved Collection, containing over 2,000 volumes currently being digitized.
• Classrooms, an auditorium, a cafeteria, and an instrument storage room to meet the needs of its community.

  • An Accessible School for Everyone
    One of the most remarkable features of the National Conservatory of Music is that it is virtually free, allowing both Mexicans and foreigners to access its educational offerings after passing the admission exams.
  • Distinguished Students and Artistic Legacy
    The National Conservatory of Music has been the starting point for some of Mexico’s most influential musicians, composers, and performers. Their contributions to national and international music reflect the institution’s commitment to artistic excellence.
  • Carlos Chávez (1899–1978): The Consolidation of Musical Nationalism
    Carlos Chávez, one of the most iconic figures in Mexican music history, studied at the National Conservatory of Music, where he developed a deep understanding of the country’s cultural roots. Chávez stood out as the founder and conductor of the Mexican Symphony Orchestra, a platform that promoted the works of national composers.
    Most notable works: Sinfonía India and Caballos de Vapor. These pieces integrate indigenous and folkloric elements into a modern symphonic structure, marking a milestone in nationalist music.
    International legacy: Chávez also directed the National Institute of Fine Arts (INBA) and represented Mexico at numerous international cultural forums.
  • Silvestre Revueltas (1899–1940): The Intensity of Mexican Modernity
    Another distinguished alumnus, Silvestre Revueltas, is remembered for his profoundly emotional work and his ability to capture the spirit of post-revolutionary Mexico.
    Key works: Sensemayá, inspired by a poem by Nicolás Guillén, and La Noche de los Mayas. These compositions blend popular traditions with avant-garde techniques.
    Cultural impact: Revueltas’s music transcended national borders, being performed internationally and solidifying his status as a symbol of musical modernism.
  • Ángela Peralta (1845–1883): The Prodigy Soprano
    Although her connection to the Conservatory was not academic, Ángela Peralta is a figure who inspired generations of musicians trained at this institution. Known as “The Mexican Nightingale,” she was one of the first Mexican sopranos to achieve global fame.
    International career: Her talent led her to perform in Europe and Latin America, leaving an indelible mark on the opera world.
    Conservatory legacy: Her life and work continue to inspire students at the Conservatory to achieve success beyond national borders.
  • Blas Galindo (1910–1993): Innovator and Advocate of Mexican Folklore
    Blas Galindo, a disciple of Carlos Chávez, carried on the nationalist legacy by incorporating Mexican folklore elements into his music.
    Representative work: Sones de Mariachi, an orchestral suite that pays homage to traditional mariachi sounds.
    Academic contributions: In addition to composing, Galindo was an influential teacher at the Conservatory, passing on his artistic vision to new generations.
  • Eduardo Mata (1942–1995): A Master of Orchestral Conducting
    Eduardo Mata emerged as one of the most important Mexican orchestral conductors of the 20th century.
    International career: He conducted the Dallas Symphony Orchestra and collaborated with major orchestras in Europe and America.
    Connection to the Conservatory: Though much of his career was abroad, Mata regularly returned to Mexico to work with the National Conservatory and the UNAM Philharmonic Orchestra.
  • Prominent Contemporary Artists
    The Conservatory continues to nurture talents who shine in today’s music scene:
    Alondra de la Parra: Renowned conductor who has brought Mexican music to international stages like Carnegie Hall.
    Arturo Márquez: Contemporary composer whose Danzón No. 2 has become a symbol of modern Mexican music.
    Javier Álvarez: Innovative composer combining electronic music with acoustic elements, showcasing an experimental and modern approach.

Tips for Entering the National Conservatory of Music

Is it difficult to get into the National Conservatory of Music?
Admission to the Conservatory is challenging, requiring a high level of preparation and commitment. Applicants must pass rigorous auditions and meet academic requirements to demonstrate their ability to handle the demanding program.

Advice for Applicants
For aspiring students, solid preparation is essential, including consistent practice, theoretical study, and prior performance experience. Participating in workshops and masterclasses can also make a difference.

Alternative Options for Studying Music in Mexico
While the National Conservatory of Music is the most prestigious institution, Mexico offers other excellent options, such as UNAM’s National School of Music and various private academies with quality programs.

The National Conservatory of Music has not only witnessed but also played a leading role in the cultural evolution of Mexico. Since its founding in 1866, it has trained generations of musicians who have brought Mexican art to the world.

spot_img

Tijuana declares state of emergency ahead of potential mass deportations  

by the El Reportero‘s staff

The municipal government of Tijuana has declared a state of emergency in anticipation of a potential surge in deportations, following the anticipated return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency next week.

On Monday evening, Tijuana Mayor Ismael Burgueño Ruíz announced on social media that the city council held an urgent meeting to prepare for the possibility of a significant influx of deported migrants. “We unanimously passed an emergency declaration to ensure the dignified treatment of deportees, uphold their human rights, and allocate the necessary resources,” Burgueño wrote.

With Trump set to begin his second term as president on January 22, he has vowed to implement what he calls the “largest deportation operation in U.S. history.” However, details about the scope and timing of the deportations remain unclear.

Ahead of the meeting, Burgueño presented a proposal that would allow Tijuana to access emergency funds from local budgets to handle the “atypical situation” that may arise if large numbers of deportees arrive. The exact amount of funds has not been specified, but reports suggest the money could cover various needs, including staffing, facility rentals, utilities, internet, and legal assistance. In addition, the emergency declaration will enable Tijuana to seek federal assistance for the anticipated wave of deportees.

Given that many deportees may need temporary shelter and food as they prepare to resettle in Mexico, the city’s existing network of migrant shelters — already under pressure — may not suffice to handle a significant increase in arrivals. Tijuana has been opening new shelters in recent months, but these may still prove inadequate in the face of a large-scale deportation effort.

To address this, Burgueño proposed leasing an industrial space in southern Tijuana capable of accommodating up to 5,000 people. Following the city council meeting, the mayor emphasized that Tijuana’s local government is working closely with both the Baja California state government and federal authorities to coordinate their response.

Mexico’s federal government, led by President Claudia Sheinbaum, has stated that plans to receive deportees are “ready,” although further details have not yet been released. Sheinbaum had also indicated in early January that efforts would be made to encourage the U.S. to deport migrants who are not from Mexico directly to their home countries. However, she acknowledged that Mexico might need to collaborate on deportations if necessary.

According to Alicia Bárcena, Mexico’s former foreign affairs minister, there are roughly 5.3 million undocumented Mexicans living in the United States, with other estimates putting the figure between 4 million and 5 million. In San Diego County alone, about 120,000 undocumented Mexicans are reported to reside, according to the Mexican Consulate.

While the deportation threat looms for many, the contributions of undocumented Mexicans to the U.S. economy have been widely recognized by Mexican officials, further complicating the issue. As the Biden administration transitions to Trump’s second term, it is unclear how the deportation process will unfold and what it will mean for the tens of thousands of migrants and families already caught in the web of U.S. immigration policy.

– With contributions from El Universal, The San Diego Union-Tribune and AFP.

spot_img

The fall of Trudeau: A new chapter for Canada’s conservatives?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

by the El Reportero‘s staff

The potential resignation of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau could mark a pivotal moment in the nation’s political landscape. For the Conservative Party, this transition offers both a challenge and an opportunity to reassert its relevance and potentially reshape the future of Canada. As the Liberal Party navigates the aftermath of losing a high-profile leader, questions arise about whether the Conservatives can seize this moment to gain prominence and lead the country.

Liberal instability and the conservative advantage

Leadership transitions often bring uncertainty, and Trudeau’s departure would undoubtedly create a leadership vacuum within the Liberal Party. For over a decade, Trudeau has been the face of Canadian liberalism, championing progressive policies on climate change, gender equality, and inclusivity. Without him, the Liberal Party faces the dual challenge of finding a new leader and maintaining a coherent vision that resonates with Canadians.

Such instability could play into the hands of the Conservative Party. Historically, political opposition thrives during periods of uncertainty, as voters seek stability and clear alternatives. A divided Liberal Party—particularly if its leadership contest exposes ideological differences—could provide an opening for the Conservatives to position themselves as a unified and dependable force.

Economic frustrations as a rallying point

Canada, like many countries, faces economic challenges, including inflation, housing affordability, and concerns over energy policy. These issues have drawn criticism of Trudeau’s government, with some voters expressing dissatisfaction over perceived shortcomings in addressing these pressing concerns. The Conservative Party, under the leadership of Pierre Poilievre, has consistently emphasized economic issues, advocating for affordability, lower taxes, and reduced government intervention.

If Trudeau resigns, the Conservatives could amplify their message, portraying themselves as the party best equipped to handle economic recovery. By focusing on voter concerns and offering pragmatic solutions, they may attract not only their traditional base but also centrists who feel disillusioned with Liberal policies.

Opportunities and risks for the left

While the Liberal Party’s challenges could benefit the Conservatives, they also open opportunities for Canada’s other major left-leaning party, the New Democratic Party (NDP). Led by Jagmeet Singh, the NDP has positioned itself as a progressive alternative to the Liberals, advocating for wealth redistribution, universal pharmacare, and aggressive climate action.

However, the left risks fragmentation. If the NDP siphons votes from the Liberals without significantly increasing its own seat count, the Conservatives could consolidate their position and emerge as the primary beneficiary. This dynamic underscores the importance of strategic decision-making within both the Liberal Party and the broader progressive movement.

Conservative messaging and challenges

For the Conservatives, this moment is not without its challenges. To capitalize on Trudeau’s resignation, the party must present a vision that appeals to a broad and diverse electorate. While their focus on economic issues has resonated with many, they will need to address other critical concerns, including healthcare, climate change, and reconciliation with Indigenous communities.

Additionally, the party must navigate its own internal dynamics. In recent years, some factions within the Conservative Party have pushed for more populist policies, while others advocate for a return to traditional conservatism. Ensuring a cohesive platform that unites these factions without alienating moderate voters will be essential for their success.

A shift in global perceptions

Trudeau’s leadership has positioned Canada as a global leader in progressive values. His departure could signal a shift in Canada’s international role, particularly if the Conservatives take power. Policies on climate change, energy, and foreign relations might shift, aligning Canada more closely with conservative-led nations emphasizing economic growth and resource development.

For Canada’s allies and trading partners, such changes would reflect the evolving priorities of Canadian voters. Domestically, they could spark debates about the balance between economic prosperity and environmental stewardship, further shaping the country’s political discourse.

The road ahead

As the Liberal Party navigates the prospect of a post-Trudeau era, the Conservative Party stands at a crossroads. The opportunity to advance their movement is clear, but it requires strategic leadership, effective messaging, and an understanding of the evolving priorities of Canadian voters. Meanwhile, the broader political landscape—including the role of the NDP and the response of civil society—will play a crucial role in determining whether the Conservatives’ moment can translate into lasting success.

 

In the end, Trudeau’s potential resignation is not just a turning point for the Liberal Party but for Canada as a whole. It offers an opportunity for political renewal, reflection, and realignment. Whether the Conservatives can rise to the occasion remains to be seen, but their actions in the coming months will undoubtedly shape the next chapter of Canada’s political story.

 

spot_img