Wednesday, October 14, 2026
spot_img
Home Blog Page 58

Independence Day Celebration in San Francisco

By Magdy Zara

Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica commemorate their independence during the month of September, and colorful celebrations have been planned throughout the city. Below, we list some of them so you can share with your family and reconnect with your roots.

Share a Mexican Night, where you will experience a cultural experience with the Ballet Folklórico México Danza. The venue is the Douglas Morrison Theater, located at 22311 N 3rd St, Hayward, next Saturday, September 13, starting at 7 p.m.

To celebrate Guatemala’s Independence, there will be a marimba concert at the Palacio Latino, where attendees can also sample traditional Guatemalan food such as a delicious Atol broth, meat, chicken or duck broth, or pepián. The event is this Sunday, September 14th, starting at 1 p.m. at 13993 San Pablo Ave. For reservations, please contact unnai123@hotmail.com.

In Redwood City, the 2025 Fiestas Patrias celebration will be a joint event for several Latin American countries.

For this event, the Courthouse Square will be transformed into a festive, beautiful, and fun setting.

You can enjoy live music and entertainment, authentic Mexican food, craft vendors, and the traditional Flag Ceremony presided over by the Consul General of Mexico.

Redwood City’s Fiestas Patrias are scheduled for this Sunday, September 14th, from 2 p.m. to 8 p.m., at Courthouse Square, 2200 Broadway, Redwood City. Admission is free to the public.

The Consulate General of Mexico in San Francisco, the Mexican Civic Committee of San Francisco, and MNC Inspiring Success invite the general public to the celebration of El Grito de Dolores, which includes a cultural program beginning with the flag raising at 8 p.m.

This celebration takes place on Monday, September 15, at the Civic Center Plaza, 355 McAlister Street. As you may recall, this is a free annual event.

Teatro Nahual Premieres “Two Husbands for Enriqueta”

If you want to have a unique time and see one of the funniest comedies of recent times, you have to attend the world premiere of “Two Husbands for Enriqueta,” a play by Teatro Nahual.

The play “Two Husbands for Enriqueta” is based on the classic play, “The Wise Women” by French playwright Molière. This comedy ridicules intellectual pedantry and hypocrisy in 17th-century French society.

The play will premiere on Saturday, October 4 at 7:30 p.m. and on Sunday, October 5 at 2:00 p.m. at Second Stage-Mountain View for the Performing Arts.

On October 11, 18, and 25, it will be presented at 7:30 p.m. at the Movimiento de Arte y Cultura Latino Americana (MACLA) in Madrid. San José.

For more information and to purchase tickets, visit: www.teatronahual.org

spot_img

Keith Thurman dismisses Canelo vs. Crawford as “Celebrity Boxing”

by the El Reportero‘s news services

Keith Thurman believes Terence Crawford missed a chance to level the playing field ahead of his September 13 clash with Canelo Álvarez. The former welterweight champion argues Crawford could have pushed for a catchweight below 168 pounds but instead agreed to fight at Canelo’s full super middleweight limit.

That decision, Thurman says, makes the matchup feel more spectacle than sport. He has gone so far as to label it “celebrity boxing,” pointing out that Crawford is jumping multiple divisions for an immediate title shot. “Crawford never said, ‘Let’s do this at 162.’ He didn’t bring that up,” Thurman told Fighthype. “That’s why I see it as celebrity boxing.”

The remarks contrast with UFC president Dana White, who recently dismissed celebrity boxing as “goofy” in an interview with Ring Magazine. Yet Thurman maintains that Crawford’s fast track to a 168-pound title fight, without facing ranked contenders first, resembles an exhibition and undermines boxing’s competitive structure.

Question Marks for Crawford

Crawford has not fought since narrowly defeating Israil Madrimov in August 2024. Instead of easing into the division with tune-ups, he chose to leap straight into a bout with one of boxing’s most experienced champions. Thurman suggested the decision may have been strategic—avoiding the risk of looking vulnerable—but it leaves doubts about how Crawford will handle the extra weight and Canelo’s power.

Why Thurman Favors Canelo

“Canelo’s experience is the difference,” Thurman said. “We’ve never seen Crawford carry that kind of weight for 12 rounds.”

Álvarez, who has faced top competition throughout his career, brings far more big-fight experience than Crawford, whose standout wins came at lighter weights. Even his biggest welterweight victories—over Errol Spence Jr., Shawn Porter, Kell Brook, and Amir Khan—came against fighters no longer at their peak.

Fighting for Legacy

Thurman acknowledges Canelo could knock Crawford down, but he insists the real intrigue lies in whether the smaller man can endure three weight classes above his natural division.

For Crawford, Thurman argues, this isn’t about money but about cementing his legacy against one of boxing’s best.

– With reports by Michael Collins.

spot_img

Ignacio Allende in the Mexican Independence: Father of the Nation?

Ignacio Allende was a key leader in the Mexican Independence. Discover his most significant actions and why he is one of the founding fathers.

by El Reportero news services

Every September, a question arises that sparks debate: Was Ignacio Allende the true Father of the Nation? Official history grants that title to Miguel Hidalgo, but the truth is that Ignacio Allende’s role in the Mexican Independence was so decisive that he is also recognized as one of the nation’s fundamental heroes.

Ignacio Allende in the Independence Plot

Ignacio Allende, born on January 21, 1769, in San Miguel el Grande (today San Miguel de Allende, Guanajuato), was a captain in the Queen’s Dragoon Regiment. His military experience gave him a central role in the secret meetings in Querétaro, where, along with Miguel Hidalgo, Juan Aldama, and Josefa Ortiz de Domínguez, he organized the uprising against the Spanish Crown.

Allende was one of the main liaisons between civilians and the military within the conspiracy. His strategic skill helped lay the foundations for the independence movement that would erupt in 1810.

Allende’s Role in the Beginning of Mexico’s Independence

Although it was Hidalgo who delivered the famous Grito de Dolores, Allende played a decisive role in the beginning of the War of Independence. He led insurgent troops and, thanks to his military training, became the tactical mastermind behind several battles.

He was present at the capture of the Alhóndiga de Granaditas and at the Battle of Monte de las Cruces, where the insurgent army achieved one of its most resounding victories. His discipline contrasted with Hidalgo’s more improvisational style, which generated tensions between the two leaders, but also reflected the diversity of perspectives within the movement.

Strategist of the Insurgent Movement

Allende believed in the need to transform the insurgency into a formal army. He sought to organize troops with discipline and hierarchy, convinced that improvisation could cost them the cause.

This military vision was key to giving continuity to the movement after its initial successes and failures. Although differences with Hidalgo led him to distance himself at times, the combined leadership of both parties proved essential to sustaining the struggle.

Capture of Ignacio Allende, leader of the Mexican Independence

In 1811, after the defeat at Puente de Calderón, Allende, Hidalgo, and other insurgents began their retreat north. However, they were betrayed and captured in Acatita de Baján.

Allende was taken to Chihuahua, where he was shot on June 26 of that same year. His death, far from extinguishing the movement, strengthened the spirit of those who continued the fight for independence.

Today, Allende is remembered as one of the great leaders of the Independence. His military vision, his courage in battle, and his conviction place him among the undisputed protagonists of national history.

Determining whether or not he was the true Father of the Nation is less important than recognizing that, along with Hidalgo and other insurgents, Allende laid the foundations for Mexican freedom. Every September, his name resonates as an essential part of that chorus of voices that shaped independent Mexico.

– With reports from México Desconocido.

spot_img

A nation in mourning: Violence is never the answer to political differences

Marvin Ramírez, editor

by Marvin Ramírez

Today our nation grieves. On Wednesday, September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was murdered at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. The conservative leader, known for addressing college campuses and mobilizing young voters, was pronounced dead at the scene after what authorities described as a targeted attack. He leaves behind a wife and two young children. His assassination—a crime that has already shocked millions—has struck a deep chord, not only among conservatives but also among Americans of all political persuasions.

Charlie Kirk was, without doubt, a powerful figure in the conservative movement. His influence on young people, his advocacy for family values, faith, free expression, and constitutional liberties were central to his work. Many admired him; many others disagreed with him. But whether one loved him or opposed him, one cannot deny that he was a man who exercised his right to speak and to persuade peacefully, through words and ideas—not through violence. He used the tools that democracy provides. For that alone, his presence was an example of how political life in a free nation should operate.

What happened to Kirk is not merely a crime against one person. It is an attack on the very foundation of free society: the ability to speak, to organize, and to participate in shaping the future of the nation without fear of death. When disagreements turn into violence, when words are silenced by bullets, we all lose. America loses. Humanity loses.

In moments like these, it is tempting for both sides of the political spectrum to retreat into their corners, to point fingers, to inflame further anger. But if we are honest, we must admit that this cycle of hate and dehumanization is precisely what creates an environment where tragedies like this can occur. Conservatives are not monsters. Progressives are not enemies. They are fellow citizens, neighbors, coworkers, and friends. They are human beings. When any group teaches itself to despise and demonize the other, it plants seeds of violence that eventually grow into destruction.

The United States has long prided itself on being a beacon of democracy and a defender of liberty around the world. Yet in recent years, political assassinations, violent protests, and attacks on individuals for their beliefs have made headlines with disturbing regularity. These acts do not represent the majority of Americans, who yearn for peace, justice, and stability. Instead, they are carried out by small groups driven by radical ideologies—groups that often receive disproportionate attention and legitimacy through sensationalist media coverage.

It is time to say, with one voice, that this is not who we are. Violence does not strengthen democracy; it destroys it. Silencing opposing views through bloodshed is not justice; it is tyranny. Those who raise their fists and weapons against political opponents do not defend freedom—they betray it.

Charlie Kirk’s legacy will be debated for years to come, as is the case with all public figures. But one thing must remain beyond dispute: no American should fear for their life because of the ideas they speak. Freedom of expression is not a partisan value. It is not conservative or liberal. It is a human right and the cornerstone of our republic. If we lose that, we lose everything.

This tragedy calls for more than mourning; it calls for reflection. Have we, as a people, abandoned the principles of civil discourse and mutual respect? Have we allowed hatred to replace dialogue? Have we permitted the loudest, most extreme voices—whether in politics or the press—to drown out the quiet but steady call of our better angels? If so, then we must turn back, before the path leads us to even darker places.

To my fellow citizens on both sides: let us honor Charlie Kirk’s memory not with more division, but with a renewed commitment to peace. Let us meet speech with speech, idea with idea, ballot with ballot—not gun with gun. Let us remember that behind every belief is a human being, with dignity, with worth, with a family that loves them.

The world is watching. America still has the opportunity to prove that democracy is stronger than violence, that words are stronger than weapons, and that our common humanity is greater than our divisions. But that choice belongs to each of us, here and now.

Charlie Kirk’s voice has been silenced, but ours has not. May we use it not to deepen the wounds of hate, but to heal them.

spot_img

Crawford adds power ahead of super middleweight title bout with Canelo

by the El Reportero staff

LAS VEGAS — Terence Crawford’s camp says the undefeated champion has added punching power as he prepares to move up two weight divisions to challenge Canelo Alvarez for the undisputed super middleweight title on Sept. 13 at Allegiant Stadium.

Crawford’s sparring partner, Steven Nelson, said the 36-year-old has kept his trademark speed and movement while gaining strength at 168 pounds.

“He’s always had power, but now it’s different,” Nelson told Fighthype. “He still has the speed, the movement, the ability. The only thing that’s changed is his power. People are going to see on September 13.”

Crawford (41-0, 31 KOs) has fought most of his career at lightweight, junior welterweight and welterweight, collecting titles in each division. His last bout was in August 2024 against WBA junior middleweight champion Israil Madrimov, where observers noted his power appeared limited against a naturally larger opponent.

Despite the questions, Crawford’s supporters believe the added size gives him a chance to upset Alvarez (63-2-2, 39 KOs), who remains one of boxing’s most dominant champions. Alvarez has held the undisputed crown at 168 pounds since 2021.

Alvarez is known for throwing fewer punches than many of his opponents but landing with heavier impact. In his most recent defense, he defeated William Scull by unanimous decision despite throwing only 152 punches over 12 rounds.

Skepticism about Crawford’s ability to compete at super middleweight has also come from former heavyweight champion Mike Tyson, who told Sports Illustrated that Crawford’s performance against Madrimov was not impressive. “You gotta look good in order to not mess up your next fight,” Tyson said.

Crawford, who turned professional in 2008, has been criticized for sitting out the past year rather than testing himself against contenders at 168. His camp argues that the layoff has allowed him to adapt physically before facing Alvarez.

The fight will mark Crawford’s attempt to become a four-division world champion, while Alvarez seeks to defend his status as one of boxing’s biggest stars.

—With reports from ESB / Boxing News 24/7.

spot_img

Paint Sausalito Celebrates Its Third Annual Edition

By Magdy Zara

The third annual Paint Sausalito event kicked off on August 18th. This is a unique opportunity to celebrate art outdoors, bringing together live painting sessions, artist talks, and a shared passion for this unique art form.

The Sausalito Center for the Arts has an outdoor talk scheduled for this Sunday, September 7th, dedicated to the art and essence of painting outdoors.

A closing reception is scheduled for next Sunday, September 14th, where you are invited to the final hours of an outdoor Paint Sausalito exhibition.

The outdoor talk will be on Sunday, September 7th, while the closing reception (Last Look) is on September 14th, both at the Sausalito Center for the Arts, located at 750 Bridgeway Sausalito, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.

Live, outdoor music in Valencia

With three simultaneous stages, the free monthly party takes place on Valencia Street in San Francisco, taking place on the second Thursday of every month.

Take advantage of this opportunity to spend time with family or friends. You can dance to salsa, samba, R&B, rock, and much more, while Valencia Street becomes a giant party.

Attendees can also enjoy a cocktail and stroll the streets while exploring one of San Francisco’s most vibrant neighborhoods.

The event is this Thursday, September 11, starting at 5 p.m., on Valencia Street between 16th and 19th Streets, San Francisco.

San Francisco celebrates Mexican Independence

Mexican independence was a long process that, like all wars of independence, was fought in stages. Therefore, it has several important dates, two of which fell during the month of September.

For this reason, several organizations have planned activities to commemorate this important date.

The 24th Street Latino Cultural District organizes the Fiesta de las Américas annually to celebrate Mexican Independence Day. This year, it presents a varied program that includes live music, mariachi bands, a show band, several dance companies with traditional dance performances, craft and food sales, and more.

This event will take place this Saturday, September 13th, starting at 11 a.m., on 24th Street from Folsom Street to Bryant Street in San Francisco.

The Mission Cultural Center for the Latino Arts is celebrating its Noche Mexicana 2025 event with an unforgettable evening of culture, cuisine, and community.

The invitation is extended for this Saturday, September 13th, 2025, starting at 5 p.m., at the MCCLA, located at 2868 Mission Street, San Francisco. Tickets are $5.

For more information and to reserve your table, please contact info@missionculturalcenter.org

spot_img

Celebrating Latin American roots and sharing history in the U.S.

by the El Reportero staff

Every year, the month of September is filled with flags, music, dances, and traditions that commemorate the independence of numerous Latin American countries. In particular, September 15 marks a key date for five Central American nations: Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica, which commemorate their independence from Spain, proclaimed in 1821 in Guatemala City. For Latin American communities in the United States, this commemoration not only commemorates a historical event but also serves as a bridge between cultural heritage and the lives of new generations.

Central American independence emerged after three centuries of Spanish colonization, marked by social and economic limitations imposed on the region’s inhabitants. The 1821 proclamation temporarily united Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica under the name of the United Provinces of Central America. Although the union dissolved 18 years later, each nation developed its own institutions and traditions, keeping alive the spirit of freedom that began that day. Festivities include civic parades, school ceremonies, flag-raising, traditional music, and typical cuisine—from Salvadoran pupusas to Guatemalan tamales—that evoke cultural identity and allow history to be tangibly experienced.

In Mexico, independence is celebrated on September 16 with “El Grito de Dolores,” the famous ceremony commemorating the beginning of the struggle in 1810 led by Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla. Chile celebrates on September 18 with “Fiestas Patrias,” featuring parades, ramadas, folk music, and traditional foods. Other countries, such as Costa Rica, also have dates close to September, turning this month into a vibrant calendar of patriotic symbols for the entire Latin American community. In U.S. cities with large Latino populations—such as Los Angeles, Houston, Miami, New York, Chicago, and San Francisco—the festivities adapt to a multicultural environment, organizing community events, cultural fairs, concerts, parades, and school competitions, where children learn about history and culture while enjoying the celebration.

For young Hispanics born in the United States, these festivities go beyond a civic event or a parade. They are an educational tool that allows them to learn about the history of their countries of origin, the heroes who fought for independence, and the values ​​that inspired their freedom. Parents, grandparents, and teachers play a fundamental role, passing on stories, songs, dances, and recipes that might otherwise be lost over time. Thus, commemorative events become a living learning experience about history and culture, strengthening young people’s identity and sense of belonging.

Each Central American country has its own unique traditions. In Guatemala, a school flag parade and marching bands mark the day, while in Honduras, civic events are held with patriotic speeches and painting and poetry contests in schools and communities. El Salvador stands out for its school parades and folk dance performances. Nicaragua organizes marching bands, official events, and cultural festivals that include traditional foods and games. Costa Rica, although smaller, celebrates with school ceremonies and public events that commemorate independence and promote historical education from an early age.

The independence celebration also strengthens the bond between the different Latin American communities in the U.S. It is common for events to bring together Guatemalans, Salvadorans, Hondurans, Nicaraguans, Costa Ricans, and Mexicans, creating spaces for cultural exchange where music, cuisine, and traditions are shared. This strengthens community ties and allows young people to feel part of a larger community, appreciating the diversity of histories and cultures that converge in a single country.

Furthermore, preserving these traditions in the United States is an act of cultural resistance against homogenization. Teaching children and grandchildren about their countries’ origins, independence heroes, and cultural richness ensures that historical memory remains alive. Every parade, school event, or community festival is an opportunity for young people to recognize their roots, develop pride in their heritage, and share their history with new generations.

Independence celebrations in the United States also provide visibility for the Latino community. Local media, municipal governments, and schools often cover these events, showcasing the region’s cultural richness and fostering respect and understanding of diversity.

spot_img

Rethinking street cleaning: When neighborhoods could take the lead

by Marvin Ramírez – Opinion

In many San Francisco neighborhoods, residents are familiar with the dreaded street-cleaning signs: “No Parking Street Cleaning” on certain days or hours. The city’s sweeping trucks arrive, and cars that remain parked are slapped with fines, sometimes reaching $108 or more. While the goal of keeping streets clean is understandable, the system often feels excessive, especially in areas where litter is minimal and street conditions are already pristine.

Consider new construction neighborhoods or recently revitalized blocks where trash is rarely seen. Most newly built residential buildings even have their own staff making sure sidewalks and street curves remain clean. Despite this, the city’s sweeping crews pass through, issuing citations to anyone who didn’t move their vehicle. The logic behind mandatory street cleaning doesn’t always align with actual neighborhood needs, creating a tension between municipal regulations and daily life.

One potential solution is to allow neighborhoods to take control of their own street maintenance. Residents could organize voluntary cleaning efforts, ensuring sidewalks and streets remain tidy, while the city exempts those blocks from regular sweeping fines. This approach acknowledges that many community members are responsible and willing to maintain a clean environment. It also avoids penalizing people simply for following their everyday routines—and this model could work especially well in non-commercial zone neighborhoods, where ommunity participation is stronger, and pedestrian movement is very minimal.

Furthermore, shifting responsibility to neighborhoods could foster a greater sense of ownership and pride. Streets could be cleaner not because of fines and schedules, but because residents actively care for their environment. The city could still provide support with resources like trash bags, collection bins, or occasional professional sweeps, but the day-to-day upkeep could become a local effort rather than a strictly enforced mandate.

This model might not work everywhere, and it would require a coordinated system to ensure consistency and safety. But in areas where community involvement is strong, it could reduce unnecessary fines and build stronger connections among neighbors. Street cleaning could move from a punitive process to a collaborative one, striking a balance between city standards and neighborhood realities.

Ultimately, the conversation isn’t about eliminating street cleaning but about making it smarter and more flexible. By empowering neighborhoods to manage their own streets, San Francisco could maintain clean roads without alienating residents or imposing undue financial burdens.

 

spot_img

Opinion: Are contraceptive pills silently altering women—and society?

by the El Reportero‘s staff

Elon Musk is no stranger to controversy. But his recent warning about hormonal contraceptives deserves a careful look beyond the headlines and tweets. Musk highlighted a study linking hormonal birth control to changes in women’s brains, emotional responses, and even broader social behavior. Whether one agrees with his style or not, the substance of the concern is worth examining.

Tens of millions of women around the world take hormonal contraceptives—primarily pills, patches, or injections—to control fertility. On the surface, these medications promise freedom, convenience, and control over reproductive decisions. Yet research increasingly suggests that these chemical interventions may carry risks far beyond those most of us are told about.

According to Musk, the “use of hormonal contraceptives by tens of millions of women could plausibly be having population-level effects on behavior, including political behavior.” The study he referenced found that women on hormonal contraceptives tend to have stronger emotional responses than naturally cycling women and remember fewer details of negative events. These are not minor observations—they point to possible structural and functional changes in the brain, particularly the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, a region responsible for fear processing and emotional regulation.

Musk has repeatedly sounded alarms about the health risks of these medications. Last year, he noted that hormonal birth control could contribute to weight gain, double the risk of depression, and triple the risk of suicide. While some dismiss these statements as sensationalist, peer-reviewed research increasingly corroborates concerns about mental health impacts.

Beyond mood and memory, hormonal contraceptives have been linked to serious medical conditions, including breast cancer, hair loss, gestational diabetes, glaucoma, blood clots, strokes, cervical cancer, and hardening of the arteries. In 2005, a division of the World Health Organization classified chemical contraceptives as Group 1 carcinogens—the same category reserved for substances with sufficient evidence of causing cancer in humans. The implications are stark: millions of women may be taking medications that have a documented potential to contribute to life-threatening conditions.

Hormonal contraceptives have also been connected to structural changes in the brain. Studies in 2015 found that long-term use can thin or shrink regions involved in emotional regulation and decision-making. When these medications are taken during puberty—a critical period for brain development—they can produce lasting alterations. Other studies link contraceptives to reduced memory performance, changes in sexual attraction, and, in some cases, sexual dysfunction.

Tragic consequences have even occurred. In the Netherlands, 27 women died after taking a hormone pill prescribed to treat acne and excess hair growth, a drug frequently used off-label as contraception. While such cases are rare, they underscore the seriousness of potential risks.

The consequences extend beyond human health. Synthetic hormones from contraceptives often find their way into water systems, disrupting wildlife ecosystems. In some species of fish, hormonal contamination has caused gender mutations and even threatened populations with extinction. Additionally, boys exposed to these synthetic hormones in utero or through environmental contamination have a higher risk of prostate and urinary tract problems later in life.

Beyond physiological and ecological concerns, there are ethical and societal implications. Hormonal contraceptives do not merely prevent fertilization; in some instances, they can terminate early-stage embryos, raising questions about their classification as abortifacient drugs. Cultural reliance on these medications may also create a demand for abortion when contraceptive measures fail, further entangling reproductive health with ethical debates.

One must also consider the subtle psychological and social dimensions. If millions of women experience altered emotional processing, memory retention, or risk assessment due to contraceptive hormones, how might this influence interpersonal relationships, professional environments, or even political decisions? While these population-level effects are complex and difficult to quantify, the potential is real and deserves public awareness.

This is not an argument against women’s autonomy or access to contraception. No one is suggesting that women should be denied reproductive choices. But it is increasingly clear that millions of women may be making these choices without a full understanding of the neurological, emotional, and societal implications of hormonal contraceptives. Transparency, informed consent, and further research are imperative.

Ultimately, the conversation Musk has reignited should not be dismissed as eccentricity. Women deserve to know both the benefits and the risks of the medications they take every day. Science is still unraveling the full picture, but existing evidence demands careful consideration. Health providers, policymakers, and women themselves must engage openly with the data, asking difficult questions and weighing the consequences.

Hormonal contraceptives revolutionized reproductive freedom. Yet every revolution carries trade-offs. It is time to examine the hidden costs—on individual health, on society, and on the very biology of the next generation. Ignoring these findings would be as reckless as ignoring any other known risk to human well-being. Women’s autonomy and health are not mutually exclusive; informed choice is the bridge that must guide the path forward.

– With reports by Andreas Wailzer with LifeSite.

spot_img

Mexico says works created by AI cannot be granted copyright

by the El Reportero news services

In an era where artwork is increasingly influenced and even created by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Mexico’s Supreme Court (SCJN) has ruled that works generated exclusively by AI cannot be registered under the copyright regime. According to the ruling, authorship belongs solely to humans.

“This resolution establishes a legal precedent regarding AI and intellectual property in Mexico,” the Copyright National Institute (INDAUTOR) said on Aug. 28 in a statement on its official X account following the SCJN’s decision.

The SCJN’s unanimous decision said that the Federal Copyright Law (LFDA) reserves authorship to humans, and that any creative invention generated exclusively by algorithms lacks a human author to whom moral rights can be attributed.

According to the Supreme Court, automated systems do not possess the necessary qualities of creativity, originality and individuality that are considered human attributes for authorship.

“The SCJN resolved that copyright is a human right exclusive to humans derived from their creativity, intellect, feelings and experiences,” it said.

The Supreme Court resolved that works generated autonomously by artificial intelligence do not meet the originality requirements of the LFDA. It said that those requirements are constitutional as limiting authorship to humans is “objective, reasonable and compatible with international treaties.”

It further added that protections to AI can’t be granted on the same basis as humans, since both have intrinsically different characteristics.

What was the case about?

In August 2024, INDAUTOR denied the registration application for “Virtual Avatar: Gerald García Báez,” created with an AI dubbed Leonardo, on the basis that it lacked human intervention.

“The registration was denied on the grounds that the Federal Copyright Law (LFDA) requires that works be of human creation, with the characteristic of originality as an expression of the author’s individuality and personality,” INDAUTOR said.

The applicant contested the denial, arguing that creativity should not be restricted to humans. In the opinion of the defendant, excluding works generated by AI violated the principles of equality, human rights and international treaties, including the United States, Mexico and Canada agreement (USMCA) and the Berne Convention.

However, the Supreme Court clarified that such international treaties do not oblige Mexico to give copyrights to non-human entities or to extend the concept of authorship beyond what is established in the LFDA.

Does the resolution allow registration of works generated with AI? 

Yes, provided there is a substantive and demonstrable human contribution. This means that works created in collaboration with AI, in which humans direct, select, edit or transform the result generated by AI until it is endowed with originality and a personal touch, are subject to registration before INDAUTOR.

Intellectual property specialists consulted by the newspaper El Economista explained that to register creative work developed in collaboration with AI, it is important to document the human intervention and submit the creative process in a way that aligns with the LFDA.

spot_img