Wednesday, July 17, 2024
Home Blog Page 579

Tap water is free and is healthy

by Marvin J Ramirez

Marvin RamirezMarvin Ramirez

Not long ago, people got their water only from the tap. Now, almost most people buy water in a bottle, sometimes thinking the quality is better.

A water seller came by my office sometimes ago. He offered me one of those big water gallons for free.

“For free? I asked. Yes, he said, but I would need to sign up for a contract. I said: “No thanks. I don’t think I need it.”

“Where do you get your water from” he asked. I said, “from the tap.”

Then we entered into a short, friendly discussion, and I was able to explain to him that we have ran articles – sponsored by KQED – in the paper about the this subject, and I assured him that in fact tap water in San Francisco is one of the ones in the nation. And that bottled water could be of less quality.

According to the International Bottled Water Association (IBWA), North Americans drank 5 billion gallons of water in 2001. That’s about the same amount of water that falls from the American Falls at Niagara Falls in two hours.

The business of selling bottled water has grown to great proportions in more than a decade, and have taken a large space at nearly every supermarket, convenience store and vending machine from coast to coast, where dozens of brands compete for consumers’ dollars. In four years, industry experts anticipate that bottled water will be second only to soda pop as America’s beverage of choice, according to a report.

Water, of course, is essential to human health. Drinking enough water to replace whatever is lost through bodily functions is important. Besides the water inside the bottle, which according to experts  is not different or perhaps not any better from tap water, cities around the globe are taking now steps that could reduce the consumption of bottle water.

Noticing on the environmental impact caused by the huge number of plastic bottle out there in the market, are many cities nationwide and globally.

A push to bring back the tap, led by mayors who want to cut down on global warming is underway.

According to a report, nothing irks Salt Lake City Mayor Ross (Rocky) Anderson more than seeing people tote water in plastic bottles. In fact, he argues, his city has some of the best tap water in the country. Several months ago, Anderson instructed department heads to stop buying bottled water for the city’s 2,200 workers and provide coolers and fountains instead.

And this is now happening in San Francisco, where the city is going to stop buying bottle water for city employees, which has been costing the city millions every year.

Anderson is urging the U.S. Conference of Mayors to promote tap water as a way to limit greenhouse-gas emissions.

Most water brands are packaged in a plastic derived from crude oil, polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Those containers are then transported on diesel-burning trucks-or shipped in from exotic destinations like Fiji, generating greenhouse gases.

Water from the tap, is good, and healthy. Stop buying water when you can get for free, while you will protect the environment.

Boxing – The Sport of Gentlemen


Saturday, July 14

– at Hamburg, Germany, 12 rounds,

heavyweights: Luan Krasniqi (30-2-1, 14 KOs) vs.

Tony Thompson (29-1, 17 KOs).

Saturday, July 14

– at London, 12 rounds, featherweights:

Nicky Cook (27-0, 15 KOs) vs. Steven Luevano (32-1, 14 KOs);

12 rounds, lightweights: Willie Limond (28-1, 8 KOs) vs.

Amir Khan (12-0, 9 KOs).

Saturday, July 14

– at Dublin, Ireland, 12 rounds,

middleweights: John Duddy (20-0, 15 KOs) vs. Alessio Furlan

(19-8-5, 8 KOs).

Saturday, July 14

– at Orilla, Ontario – 12 rounds,

IBF super bantamweight title: Steve Molitor (23-0, 9 KOs)

vs. Takalani Ndlovu (27-3, 17 KOs).

Saturday, July 14

– at Atlantic City (HBO) – 12 rounds,

IBF welterweight title: Kermit Cintron (27-1, 25 KOs)

vs. Walter Dario Matthysse (26-1, 25 KOs); 10 rounds,

welterweights: Arturo Gatti (40-8, 31 KOs) vs.

Alfonso Gomez (16-3-2, 7 KOs).

Saturday, July 14

– at Biloxi, Mississippi (PPV) –

10 rounds, light heavyweights: Roy Jones Jr.

(50-4, 38 KOs) vs. Anthony Hanshaw (21-0-1, 14 KOs);

10 rounds, welterweights: Oscar Diaz (25-2, 12 KOs) vs.

Juan Manuel Buendia (14-1-1, 8 KOs); 10 rounds,

super featherweights:  Zahir Raheem (28-2, 16 KOs)

vs. Derrick Gainer (40-7-1, 24 KOs).

Pesticide leaves Latin American banana workers sterile

by the El Reportero wire services

Approximately 5,000 agricultural workers from Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Honduras and Panama have filed five lawsuits in the United States, claiming they were left sterile due to the exposure to the pesticide, DBCP, in the 1970s.

Jury selection for the first of the lawsuits is scheduled to begin Tuesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

According to Duane Miller, one of the attorneys representing more than 30 Nicaraguan plaintiffs who worked on plantations from 1964 to 1990, this is the first time any case for a banana worker has come before a U.S. court.

Legal experts said the issue is raised by the cases that whether multinational companies should be held accountable in the country where they are based or the countries where they employ workers.

If those workers win the cases, a door could be open for others to file similar claims in the U.S., where juries are known for awarding bigger judgments.

“The administration of justice in developing countries in comparison to the administration of justice in the U.S. – there’s a big gap,” said Alejandro Garro, a Columbia University law professor.

“The significance of it is we’re talking about a global economy where big business does business all over the world and where we don’t have a uniform type of justice,” he added, according to an Associated Press report.

Dole Fresh Fruit Co. and Standard Fruit Co., now a part of Dole, is accused by the upcoming lawsuit, which was filed in 2004, of negligence and fraudulent concealment while using the pesticide.

According to the lawsuit Dow Chemical Co. and Amvac Chemical Corp., manufacturers of the pesticide, “actively suppressed information about DBCP’s reproductive toxicity”.

Attorney Erin Burke, who represents Westlake-based Dole, and Kelly Kozuma, a spokeswoman for Newport Beach-based Amvac, declined to comment.

A spokesman for Midland, Michigan-based Dow, Scot Wheeler said in an e-mail that the lawsuits were without merit, and that “there are no generally accepted studies in the scientific community of which we are aware which establishes an effect on sterility in banana farm workers” exposed periodically to the chemical.

Wheeler also wrote that workers bringing these claims rotated jobs often or changed jobs altogether with enough frequency that long-term exposure would have been fairly unusual and it is not likely that there is any injury whatsoever related to DBCP.

It was so a special treatment for a special girl

by Marvin J. Ramírez

Left to right: Sharon Elizalde, Shazanna Tejeda, Janine Racasa, Nicole Marie, Mina Alexandra Santiago, Linda Elizalde.Left to right: Sharon Elizalde, Shazanna Tejeda, Janine Racasa, Nicole Marie, Mina Alexandra Santiago, Linda Elizalde.

­

Surrounded by all those who love her, Nicole Marie Santiago-Bermúdez was greated like a princess on June 23, when she celebrated her 15th birthday in a big Quinceañera party at the Sons of Italy hall in the Excelsior District in San Francisco.

At the beat of congas and bongos with Christian music, her father, Israel Santiago, from of Río Piedras, Puerto Rico, beat the instruments with extraordinary mastery, while the band’s other members backed him up with base and piano. Meanwhile, her mother, Adriana Bermúdez-Santiago, who at 15 was a beauty pageant herself in her native Nicaragua, attended and greeted the guests before everyone sat down to eat the delicious food cooked by Anna’s Restaurant.

Born on June 23, 1992 in the city of San Francisco, Nicole, who prior to her quinceañera party graduated from the 10th grade at Living Hope Christian School, a year ahead, and with honor, transferred to San Francisco Christian School, where she plans to graduate with her High School Diploma.

Nicole entered the path from a girl to a teenager status, or ‘señorita according to the Hispanic culture with a vision of some day attend a university and become a lawyer of a doctor.

Twice in her life, accompanying her mother, Nicole visited women prisons in Nicaragua as a missionary, to bring hope and love to those who lost their freedom for crimes committed. Today she has signed up as a volunteer at a local senior citizen’s center.

Students’ fast for the D.R.E.A.M Act came to an end

from the El Reportero staff

Hunger strike for educationThree of a group of 26 students, rest in front of the SF City Hall during a seven-day hungry strike protest to ask Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to support and act in favor of the D.R.E.A.M. Act, which will allow undocumentes students to pay and receive resident’s fees and benefits. (Photos by Marvin J. Ramírez).Adelia SánchezAdelia Sánchez

Eight days have past, and the students fasting for the D.R.E.A.M. Act (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) survived.

During the week-long fast, students from the California Dream Network have delivered the message that they refuse to give up hope. On July 9, students, parents, community leaders, education and immigration advocates from across the state gathered at San Francisco Civic Center Plaza to announce the end of the event.

“Till now, the office of Nancy Pelosi has hesitated in taking action … this hungry strike has been specifically focused at her to take action as a leader of the Congress,” said Adelia Sánchez, from the Coalition for Immigrant Rights. “I know we are facing a very challenging  year, but I very positive and have no doubt that we are and will receive the respect that we deserve as a community.”

This statewide fast, organized by college and university immigrant student groups that form the California Dream Network, was aimed at urging Speaker of the House Pelosi to move forward on immigration reform that includes the bipartisan federal D.R.E.A.M. Act, which would provide a path towards citizenship for undocumented youth.

On July 2, over 26 campus members held a one-day fast at four locations: Santa Ana, Pasadena, Bakersfield and San Jose, then moved in a caravan from each location to join the fast in San Francisco on July 5.

The current immigration laws, which set high assessments to higher education for undocumented students, are major obstacles for those youth trying to obtain legal status for college and the military. But with the Senate recently failing to move forward a viable immigration reform bill, the students must depend on the House of Representatives where Congressional leaders still have an opportunity to demonstrate their leadership.

Despite the unfriendly statement by a media personality, saying “let them fast until they starve to death then that solves the problem,” students have been fasting successfully for eight days, from July 2nd to 9th, in the hope of pursuing a college education and building a better future. Now the fast has ended, but the momentum continues, read a statement.

­

Commentary: What next after collapse of immigration bill?

by Javier Rodriguez

The recently defeated Senate immigration proposal and the one waiting to be addressed in the lower house, the Strive Act, are neither pro-immigrant nor pro-worker Immigration reform.

Both fall far short of the human rights standards set forth by the United Nations International Covenant for the Protection of Migrant Workers.

Under both proposals, the legalization offer is a torturous, expensive process of 10 to 15 years wait for the coveted “green card.” Combined with a guest worker program, a destruction of the family unity concept for a point system and, of course, the so-called national security framework which endangers civil and human rights standards, making mass persecution and the criminalization of immigrants palatable.

The two proposals are gross corporated esigned legislations that if approved will maintain undocumented immigrants in suspension of their basic human rights, leaving them brutally exploitable.

More than ever, the challenge of what is to be done comes to the fore.

Either the people and their organized forces conform to the crumbs on the negotiating table or fight back.

In the base, the millions of immigrants themselves are in a quandary.

But for the future of family unity and the millions more to come, the well-being of this nation’s whole working class and our civil and human rights as a society, the stakes are very high. The result will set the path for a higher or a lower standard of living for all for years to come.

Apologists for the dead Senate bill have been saying that while the proposals are not perfect to “fix” the broken immigration system under present conditions “it’s the best we can get.” Additionally, it has to happen this year because the presidential campaign will take precedence and there will not be another opportunity for years.

It’s imperative to look at history. From 1982 to 1986, until President Ronald Reagan signed the amnesty law, the masses of undocumented immigrants, then an estimated six million, organized and demonstrated militantly.

We mounted the massive effort for amnesty into the historic “Jesse Jackson for President campaign of 1984. It was this campaign through California’s Democratic primary, which I was directing in the Latino community.

10~000 GATHER IN DOWNTOWN L.A.

On May 19 of that year we held the largest yet street protest for immigration rights, 10,000 in downtown Los Angeles.

Jackson and my brother Antonio Rodríguez led it. It was for legalization’ no raids or deportations, and against the Simpson-Mazzoli immigration bill.

We then tactically had Jackson stay at the home of Carmen Lima, an undocumented immigrant female leader of the Los Angeles grassroots movement.

That was a radical and highly symbolical move by the highest African-North American leader of the time.

From there we catapulted to the San Francisco Democratic National Convention, where several hundred Latino delegates frenetically demanded from the leadership to kill the bill.

13ut what put the icing on the cake was civil disobedience.

The offices of the top gurus of the National Democratic Party, the law firm of Mannat and Associates in Beverly Hills, were taken by 30 undocumented immigrants and leaders and held for several days.

The Simpson-Mazzoli bill was killed and replaced by lRCA 1986, the Simpson Rodino law.

Although it introduced employer sanctions and set four years of residency in the country to qualify, it was a generous amnesty. It empowered millions with “a permit to work, a one-year wait to get the green card and six total to gain citizenship and vote”.

It was the class action lawsuit, then the mass upsurge, the street heat, the presidential campaign, civil disobedience, militant tactics and a radical leadership that did it. The rest is history.

In this potentially last stage of the present struggle for the empowerment of the millions of undocumented workers, conditions for a more creative expression to fight back have to be analyzed and logically placed into practice.

IN 2006, HISTORYWAS MADE

In 2006, history was made with the largest mass movement in this country’s history. Today’s gigantic struggle for immigration reform is rich in its political and organizational expressions and legacy.

The immigrant rights movement and the immigrant worker have generated respect and solidarity, not only here but worldwide. In Los Angeles alone, the May 1 National Great American Boycott stopped a whooping 75% of production in, almost all the industries where Latino immigrants labor was critical.

Latest polls clearly indicate majority support for legalization. The millions who marched in 2006 and 2007 did so to demand empowerment, not near slavery.

WE NEED TO PUSH RIGHT BUTTONS

We need to push the right buttons. Set the network of forces on the chosen targets which could give premium political results that will essentially force the political establishment to concede.

All targets in the political arena are fair game, including the Republicans, the Democrats, the Latino Establishment and brokers. The fundamental tactics of mass expression include street demonstrations, the boycotts and civil disobedience that exist in our political memory and our history. Hispanic Link.

(Political strategist Javier Rodriguez was the initiator of the 1.7 million digitally counted mass protest of March 25, 2006 In Los Angeles. E-mail him at jrodhdztf@hotmail.com)

Mexico — beautiful, beloved and broke –– except for Carlos Slim

by Andy Porras

México lindo y querido — beautiful and beloved, as the old ballad proclaims — is also a land of depressing disparity. It is, as a recent study sizes up, almost 50 percent dirt poor.

Then, too, Mexico is the home of the world’s richest man, Carlos Slim Helu. His family came to Mexico from Lebanon just before the 1911 Mexican Revolution.

Is there something wrong with this picture? Many Mexicans, rich or poor, think so.

Slim is a cigar-smoking, 67-year-old tycoon worth, as of July 4, $63 billion.

He doesn’t believe in charitable causes a la Bill Gates. His influence in his country all but offends.

If you’re a young Mexican you were probably born in one of Slim’s Star Médica hospitals and use electricity carried by his Condumex brand cables.

You also drive on roads paved by the Slim’s CILSA construction company and your vehicle uses fuels pumped from his Swecomex drilling platforms.

More than likely you communicate through his Telmex phone lines. Plus, you probably smoke Slim’s tobacco, sold under the Marlboro brand, and shop at Sears Roebuck of Mexico, a subsidiary of his colossal Carso Group.

This Mexican mogul, who cites his having traded baseball cards as a youngster as what trained him for the future, is giving monopoly a totally new meaning.

He claims that the New York Yankees are still his favorite baseball team, but he follows Barry Bonds’ home run quest with passion.

In a recent interview, he said that he searches for undervalued businesses, infuses them with cash, and then uses the size of his holdings to overwhelm the competition. Today he owns controlling stakes in more than 200 businesses.

In a country where nearly 50 percent of the population lives in poverty and thousands risk their lives in search of a survival wage across the U.S. border, you might understand why Slim’s wealth causes some resentment. Coupled with the fact that his philosophy is based on a “conviction that poverty is not fought with donations, charity or public spending,” he has not exactly endeared him to Mexicans living outside his hacienda.

It’s been reported that Slim’s business holdings are now so vast that sometimes he loses track of what he owns. His companies employ more than 200,000 people. He says that by keeping those companies strong he’s making his most important contribution to Mexico’s economy.

Slim once explained to a U.S. reporter that while words speak to many people,  “to some of us, it’s the numbers.”

According to Professor Celso Garrido, a Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) economist, the domination of his country’s conglomerates chokes off growth of smaller companies,  thus resulting  in the shortage of good jobs and driving many Mexicans to seek better lives north of the Rio Grande.

Forbes Magazine notes that Slim’s fortune has surged in the last two years by at least $23 billion because of his holdings in Mexico’s booming stock market, although unemployment and wages have remained more or less the same.

As Slim’s fortunes continue to blossom, so has criticism. The Mexican media has mentioned that he has pledged to donate $6 billion to three charitable foundations and plans a new building for an art museum directed at exposing disadvantaged Mexicans to European art.

“A museum for European art?” asks Ernesto Beltrán of Sacramento, now a naturalized U.S. citizen who crossed into the United States in the trunk of a Cadillac. “Most Mexicans know the real story behind that endowment is to build a new building for his Soumaya Museum, named after his late wife.”

Beltrán comments that it would be hard to live one day in Mexico without purchasing any of the  products produced by a Slim corporation. “Señor Slim is so wealthy and powerful. In a country with so many poor people, it’s almost criminal.”

So what are the chances for our southern neighbor becoming a nation of more haves than have-nots?

There are two, slim and none. Hispanic Link

(Andy Porras is publisher of the Sacramento area bilingual monthly “Califas.” Reach him at califasap@yahoo.com) © 2007

Letters to the editor

AB 1634, what many call “the Pet Extinction Act” now moves to the State Senate having passed by one vote in the Assembly. In what appears to be more of a puppet show at the Capitol and a turn toward communism, the new amended version thanks to Assembly member Lloyd Levine, allows a family to breed their dog one time but prohibits the pups to be sold and must be given away free! The adult dogs must then be sterilized. Families that are violators can be fined and charged criminally.

Last week at the Pacific Convention of the California Veterinary Medical Association there were many angry disputes between the state’s veterinarians.Security had to be called to protect the leadership that continues to back the bill even though its members were not allowed to make that decision.

Dr. Ron Cole, President of the San Francisco Dog Training Club calls AB 1634 the Big Lie stating that the numbers supplied by Assemblymember Levine are gross, exaggerated and a tactic employed by animal rights activists for decades even though euthanasia at shelters has been going down statewide, even in the worst areas.

He continues, “The truth is that the public is tired of Big Lies, whether they are about W.M.D. or a supposed pet population problem… we should be able to count on our elected representatives not to perpetuate the Big Lie and not to enact such an unpopular and unjust law.”

The National Animal Interest Alliance, a long-term advocate of neutering pets, opposes the bill because it robs dog and cat owners of the ability to make critically important decisions about whether and when to have surgery performed on their pet and grants this decision to the government. PetPAC, a grass roots coalition recently formed to fight AB 1634, marched with their dogs as a contingency in the recent Pride Parade.

Once again, GOP ignores its expanding ‘Hispanic deficit’

by Raúl Reyes

From César Chávez’s 1960s boycotts to the immigrants rights movements of today, Sí se puede has long been a stock phrase in Hispanic politics.  While it translates as “Yes, we can,” the real message has always been greater.  Sí se puede means we’ll fight the good fight, we’ll persevere, we’ll never give up.

These three words are routinely invoked everywhere from high school assemblies to presidential campaigns.  It’s the Latino call to action.

Yet lately I’m wondering if the GOP has decided on a strategy of No se puede — No, we can’t — when it comes to Hispanic voters.

At the June 28-30 convention of the National Association of Latino Elected & Appointed Officials, Republicans opted out of the forum for presidential candidates.  All of the GOPers except for Rep. Duncan Hunter of California sent their regrets to the nonpartisan group, and the forum was canceled.  In contrast, all of the major Democratic hopefuls appeared at a separate forum at the NALEO event.

The GOP no-shows are surprising considering Florida is home to the USA’s most conservative Hispanics. The state’s three Hispanic House members are Republican, as is Sen. Mel Martínez, chairman of the Republican National Committee. Some state leaders did not even try to put a positive spin on the lack of interest from their candidates.

“Republicans have blown off the state of Florida,” said Republican State Rep. Juan Zapata. “Turning their back on this event is kind of shameful.”

Coming in the wake of the harsh rhetoric from conservatives who contributed to the collapse of the Senate’s immigration proposal, does this mean that Republicans are giving up on Latinos?

If so, they have a lot to lose. Until recently, the GOP had been making inroads among the Hispanic electorate, which traditionally has leaned Democratic. George W. Bush made a concerted outreach to Latinos and in 2004 drew a record 40 percent of the Hispanic vote.

A new USA Today/Gallup poll shows those gains have eroded. By a three-to-one margin, Hispanics say they are Democrats or lean that way. Only 11 percent of Hispanics called themselves Republicans, down from 19 percent in 2005. Meanwhile, the number calling themselves Democrats rose from 33 percent to 42 percent.

Although Latinos are still underrepresented at the polls, our political influence is rising. Under the 2008 primary schedule, more than three-quarters of the Hispanic electorate will have a chance to vote for a presidential nominee before Feb. 5, giving us a historic chance to influence who will be the next occupant of the White House.

Florida’s Jan. 29 primary offers nearly another million Latino voters an opportunity to weigh in early on presidential nominations.

Several states voting on Super-Duper Tuesday Feb. 5 — Arizona, California, Colorado, New Jersey, New York, Illinois and New Mexico — and March 4, when Texans chime in, have significant Latino populations.

I can understand why Tom Tancredo, who once derided Miami as “a Third World country,” might not want to attend a gathering of influential Hispanics. Ditto for Fred Thompson, the potential candidate who recently linked Cuban immigrants to “suitcase bombers.” Yet it’s hard to see why McCain, architect of the failed Senate proposal, would not make time for NALEO.  And aren’t Romney and Giuliani, both of whom have Spanish-language web sites, interested in meeting the leaders of our community?

The Republicans damaged their standing among Latinos by allowing the tone of the immigration debate to become offensive to most Hispanics. So the NALEO convention would have been a prime opportunity for them to demonstrate they are still committed to the nation’s largest minority group.  Instead, by snubbing NALEO, the Republicans sent the misguided message that Latinos are not important to the GOP.  In the future, even more Hispanics just might say Sí se puede – to Democratic candidates.

(Raúl Reyes practices law in New York City. Reach him at rarplace@aol.com.)

© 2007

Appeal for end to killings in Guatemala

by the El Reportero’s wire services

GUATEMALA – Politicians from all parties appealed on 5 July for an end to the violenc. The country’s murder rate has increased sharply in recent weeks prompting some politicians to claim that General Otto Pérez Molina, the rightwing candidate for the Partido Patriota, wants to create a climate of fear to improve his chances in the forthcoming general elections. Pérez Molina advocates tougher anti-crime policies (mano dura).

Since campaigning started officially in mid May, 44 politicians have been murdered: in the whole of the previous election campaign only 23 politicians were killed. The country goes for the polls in the first round of elections on 9 September.

On 4 and 5 July, 12 people were murdered including two (centre left) candidates for office. So far this year 30 candidates for public office, mostly from the left and centre left, have been gunned down. In the past month alone eight candidates have been killed. In addition, the killing of political organizers and even violent attacks on party activists fly-posting on behalf of their candidates has increased.

Bolivia’s constituent assembly awards itself four more months

BOLIVIA – Delegates to Bolivia’s constituent assembly celebrated the anniversary of their election on 2 July by extending their mandate to draft a new constitution by four months until 14 December.

Debating in the assembly in Sucre provided a marked contrast with the carnival atmosphere in the affluent east of the country, where the Media Luna departments of Santa Cruz, Tarija, Beni and Pando staged big events to mark a year since they voted “yes” in referenda on autonomy.

Departmental prefects and civic committees presented individual statutes of autonomy that provide a direct challenge to the assembly which is supposed to decide the nature of the autonomy to be established in Bolivia.

Cuba, facing drop in food production

HAVANA – Cuba is repaying debts to farmers and promising higher prices for milk and meat in an attempt to increase flagging food production in a communist society that depends on the state for most of what it eats.

It’s trying to head off a crisis in its food system: Production dropped 7 percent last year, imports are becoming more expensive and consumers complain their tiny government salaries don’t allow them to buy more than a few items a month at supply-and-demand farmers markets.

Hundreds march in Ecuadorian Amazon to protest Chevron’s delay tactics

LAGO AGRIO, Ecuador – Hundreds of local indigenous people and campesinos marched today to protest Chevron´s delay tactics as a judgment approaches in a landmark multi-billion dollar environmental lawsuit against the company.

After the march, the community members, including leaders of several indigenous tribes and dozens of cancer victims, gathered at Texaco’s (now Chevron’s) first Ecuadorian oil well — opened 40 years ago in 1967 — in formation to spell the international “SOS” distress signal, and the words “Justicia Ya” (Justice Now) in 40-foot letters across the rainforest clearing.

The stunning images, captured by photographers from a helicopter circling overhead, send a message from the people of the Amazon to the Live Earth concert broadcast this Saturday, organized by former US Vice President Al Gore to draw international attention to the effects of global warming and the world’s unsustainable dependence on fossil fuels.