by Mike Adams
Natural News

I’m not sure which is the more offensive way to create meat. There’s the current “factory farm” method where masses of hormone-jacked, antibiotics-injected cows are kept confined in what can only be called bovine concentration camps while they’re fed genetically modified corn, then slaughtered without compassion and subjected to diabolical meat-harvesting machinery that turns a cow carcass into corporate profits.

On the other hand, there’s the new method being touted across the media: Test tube hamburgers made from thin strips of meat grown in a nutrient vat laced with bovine fetus stem cells. Yumm!

The test tube meat strips actually pulsate and twitch during their laboratory growth phase, by the way, and they’re ultimately ground up with strips of test tube fat grown in a similar way to produce a fatty hamburger-like substance.

This has been accomplished by Professor Mark Post of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, who announced his team’s results at the American Academy for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) yesterday.

Test tube meat is here to save the world! “In October we are going to provide a proof of concept showing out of stem cells we can make a product that looks, feels and hopefully tastes like meat,” says Mark Post at the announcement (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9091628/Testtube-ham…). Of course, what does processed meat actually taste like anyway? MSG, sodium nitrite and processed salt, for the most part. So making lab-grown meat taste like today’s factory-processed meat only requires the injection of a few additives into the growth culture. Imagine growing meat patties with MSG inside every cell! Creating one hamburger will require 3,000 strips of meat, each just half a millimeter thick and grown in laboratory vats. Unlike a cow, which requires roughly two years to grow to the point of slaughter, a test tube burger can be produced in just six weeks.

The “benefits” of test tube hamburger production are being touted as substantial, including:

• More efficient conversion of plants to meat.

• Less environmental damage .

• More humane than killing animals.

• Is the only feasible way to feed more me atto the world.

Of course, they also said that GMOs would “feed the world.” Bill Gates calls genetically modified foods “high-tech agriculture” now, with the strong implication that technology is always superior to Mother Nature (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=1EE22C52BA26FA296CFC8A0361571555). But I’m not so sure about that. In fact, this whole thing sounds more than a little creepy to me.

Test tube meat to feed the masses? Gee, what could possibly go wrong?

I’m skeptical any time technology claims to outperform nature. Look what they’ve done with GMOs, chemical pesticides, vaccines, or nuclear power. In almost every case where “scientific progress” is touted as the solution for humankind, it ends up creating a nightmare that’s far worse than the problem it was trying to solve.

For the record, I choose not to eat cow meat. I’m not a vegetarian, but I’ve been around lots of cows on farms, and I see cows as conscious, aware mammals who have memories, emotions, families ­and social structure. They are every bit as intelligent as horses, and most people would cringe at the idea of eating a horse burger.

However, in a survival situation, I would have no hesitation eating grassfed beef if it were from a healthy farm source.

In fact, my personal supply of preparedness foods consists of several bags of USDA organic grass-fed beef jerky made without MSG or sodium nitrite. But when it comes to growing hamburgers out of stem cells in a petri dish, the whole thing just smacks a little too much of soylent green. How are we to know what they really put in the nutrient solution? Maybe it contains growth hormones to speed production. Maybe  it’s loaded with syntheticchemical vitamins instead of natural vitamins. Maybe it’s contaminated with Prozac or fluoride to make us all feel happy and oblivious while we eat synthetic meat. How are we to know what they do with it?

Artificial meat monstrosity

And then, of course, it’s only a matter of time before they start to genetically modify the test tube meat, perhaps using selected genes from the human genetic code to make the end product is more compatible with human biology while avoiding any risk of allergies. Sothen what do we have? Hybrid bovine / human meat.

So I guess if you set up a test tube meat lab, splice together a bunch of genes from various species (humans, cows, dogs, insects, ogres, possums and Janet Napolitano) and then grow a vat of some sort of convulsing fibrous tissue that can be made into a 99-cent hamburger, then the great masses will eat it! Who cares what the tissues are floating in, right? As long as it’s offered with a combo meal that includes French fries and an aspartamelaced Diet Coke, people will chug it straight down while watching NBA games and declaring, “We’re winning!” No doubt test tube hamburger makers will tout their meat as being “Cruelty Free” by saying “No animals were killed in the harvesting of this meat.” Maybe not, but how many humans will be killed in the consumption of it?

A mysterious financial supporter backs the entire thing By the way, this whole freak show of artificial meat production is being financed by an “…anonymous and extremely wealthy benefactor who Prof Post claims  is a household name witha reputation for ‘turning everything into gold’.” I wouldn’t be surprised at all to learn that Bill Gates was behind it — or someone similarly motivated by a global depopulation agenda.

Bottom line: Artificial meat may be an extraordinary idea, but given the total lack of ethics found in the scientific community today, I wouldn’t trust these people any farther than I could hurl a cow chip.

­por Hannah Stone guest blogger

Florindo Eleuterio Flores Hala

The capture of “Comrade Artemio,” one of the last of the Shining Path rebels’ old guard to remain at large, is a security success for Peru’s government, but is unlikely to affect the country’s burgeoning drug trade.

On Thursday, the news emerged that Artemio, whose real name is Florindo Eleuterio Flores Hala, had been seriously wounded in the early hours of the morning. Some reports (most links are in Spanish) said he was shot by his own bodyguards, who were working for the authorities, though others said he was hit in a confrontation with the police.

He was found on Sunday morning by a military patrol, lying gravely wounded in a hut near the river Misholla, in Tocache province, San Martin region. Later that day he was flown by military helicopter to Lima. As the veteran guerrilla fighter was carried on a stretcher into a police hospital, his hands heavily bandaged, he shouted some unintelligible words and raised a fist to the watching press.

Mexican party defines candidates to deputies and senators

The VIII National Council of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) will define this Sunday the list of candidates to the Chamber of Deputies and Senate for the elections next July 1 in Mexico.

Dolores Padierna, general secretary of PRD, who will be substituted because she aspires to a post in the Senate, welcomed the new national advisors and presented the proposal to the National Advisors.

The PRD National Congress held on Saturday elected the 64 advisors missing to install the Council this Sunday.

Either one or the other activities were postponed by members of this force that claimed greater participation in the process for the selection of candidates, as well as their imposition.

The VIII National Council will take oath to the six candidates to governorships, senates, federal deputies, assemblies and chiefs of delegations, besides the ratification to presidential candidate Andres Manuel López Obrador.

Alert on possible epidemic in Honduras prison burnt down

Prisoners survivors of the fire at the Farm Prison of Comayagua, Honduras, are now at risk of an epidemic by the lack of cleanliness in the place where experts of the Public Ministry collect evidence.

­Since the tragedy occurred on February 14 , the situation of disaster is complete and the inmates spend their nights out in the open, warned the Center for Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation of Victims of Torture and their Families.

This situation and other trauma caused by the incident generated insomnia in most of the inmates that are suffering from the lack of clothing, underwear, shirts, towels, sandals, toiletries, toilet paper, and others.

Prisoners need to receive more water than the one they currently receive from the centre where medical attention is not available full time and is provided only by nurses in the institution, added the release.

It is necessary that the Ministry of Health completed the application of anti-tetanus vaccine to survivors, so far only 40 have been vaccinated, stressed the civil organization.

He also ordered the prison authorities to allow the entry of food and supplies provided by the families of inmates and proceed to the immediate construction of a new prison in the area. (Christian Science Monitor and Prensa Latina contributed to this report).

Security industry boomed for years, but terror is rarely a focus

by Allison Linn
msnbc.com

When riots broke out in London this month, it didn’t take long before police began using security cameras to identify the alleged thugs.

And when a little boy went missing in New York City, security cameras were quickly used to track his last movements, although they didn’t end up saving his life.

In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the market for video surveillance cameras boomed in the United States and around the world. Shocked by the worst attack on U.S. soil in 60 years, everyone from small-business owners to executives of giant multinationals rushed to get advanced security measures in place.

A decade later, there haven’t been any more major terrorist attacks in the United States, but there are an estimated 30 million more security cameras. Instead of being used to prevent terrorist attacks, experts say cameras are more often used for mundane purposes like nabbing criminals or calling out bad behavior at the office — if they’re used at all.

Of course the use of security cameras predated 9/11, but the market exploded in the fear-tinged months following the attack. A wave of new security businesses sprang up, and existing security providers rushed to land new government and corporate contracts installing security systems.

After 9/11, many companies realized for perhaps the first time that they could be vulnerable, said Ray O’Hara, president of the security industry trade group ASIS.

“There was a lot of money spent right after 9/11 to upgrade corporate facilities,” said O’Hara, who is also an executive with the security firm Andrews International. “From a reactionary standpoint when you just sat there for a second and said, ‘Could this happen in Los Angeles?’ And (yourealized) the answer is yes.”

Story: How did 9/11 change you?

The attacks coincided with technological advancements that made it much cheaper to install and monitor surveillance cameras, allowing even small businesses and private residences to afford such protections.

Market research firm IMS Research estimates that more than 30 million surveillance cameras have been sold in the United States in the past decade. Video surveillance alone is a $3.2 billion industry, representing about one-third of the overall security market, according to 2007 figures from the Security Industry Association, a trade group.

That was the last time they gathered such data, a spokesman said.

Gregory Spear was one of those who saw opportunity soon after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. He founded Spear’s Security Industry Analyst to provide investors with information about the growing field.

After a burst of business in the first five years after the attacks, Spear said business slowed substantially, at least in part because no terror attacks occurred. Some security firms merged or went out of business, and the industry has stabilized in the last few years, he said. Business has stayed stronger outside the United States in countries such as Israel, he said. “You get attacked all the time in Israel, and you don’t get attacked in  Manhattan,” Spear said.

Still, the panic lasted long enough to create the increasingly accurate perception that there is a camera on every corner, and it’s now rare to enter an office building without seeing some evidence that you’re being watched. Few people are surprised to have their photo snapped when they walk into a building for a business meeting, or to have their identification photocopied just to meet a friend for lunch. A decade ago, those same visitors likely would have been waved through by a bored-looking security guard, if there wa any protection at all.

O t h e r u s e s Although advanced security measures are now commonplace, they are rarely being used to nab wouldbe  terrorists. Instead, security cameras often serve other purposes, such as catching students or workers who are misbehaving, or tracking down common criminals.

In London — where outdoor security cameras have long been more common than in U.S. cities police have posted screen grabs from security cameras onto a Flickr page, in the hopes that ordinary citizens will help them catch looters. The police have been assisted by civilian efforts such as the “catch a looter” Tumblr blog. Video cameras also were used to track the movement of 8-year-old Leiby Kletzky , the Brooklyn boy who was killed earlier this year while walking home alone.

The increasing prevalence of security cameras, often assisted these days by facial recognition software, have raised thorny privacy questions as Americans find their images captured with increasing regularity. But in the fearful days  after the Sept. 11 terroristattacks, people were much more likely to say that invasion of privacy was worthwhile because it also made us feel safer. Now, the advent of social networking means people have just grown more accustomed to living their lives in a more public way.

“I think that as we transition forward, the openness in our society — with the Facebooks and the social networks and what have you — is going to prevail because that’s the way we’re going to live,” said O’Hara, the security executive.

Advertise | AdChoices Privacy advocates warn that we may be too complacent about the fact that our pictures are being taken everywhere from the department store checkout counter to the high school hallway, as well as shared freely on social networks. That data can potentially be used by everyone from marketers to police investigators. “I do think it’s really important when we think about that question of where those data go in the world of social media,” said David Lyon, a professor of surveillance studies at Queen’s University in Canada.

Experts also warn that surveillance cameras — while perhaps the most obvious way in which our movements are tracked — are far from the only way personal information is now collected. In the wake of Sept. 11, and thanks also to technical advances, it’s become far more commonplace for companies to use devices such as keystroke ­trackers, which monitor everything you type on your computer.

“One thing that changed was that there was a new emphasis on attempting to obtain as much information as possible,” Lyon said. And while security cameras are everywhere, security companies increasingly are looking at the less visible threat of cyberattacks.

“Today’s buzzword is the cyber-issues. There’s just no doubt about that,” O’Hara said. “We used to worry about people coming over the fence. Now that’s probably the least (of what’s on) our minds.”

por Jonathan Nathan‚

Reprinted from BeyondChron

A family protests unjust Wells Fargo Bank’s foreclosure.

It’s been three months now that ACCE activists, municipal politicians, and local residents have protested the major bank branches in the Persia Triangle over foreclosure and home loan practices. Three months of hearing nothing but platitudes and get-back-to-yous from the banks. Three months of no relief. But the struggle of home ownership has been a longer — and realer — fight for the residents under threat. Two of them spoke to the press on Tuesday about their experiences before taking their cases — one more weary time — to the bank responsible for their hardships.

Maria Villareal embarked on the journey that has been her current home 14 years ago. The loan for her Naples Street home was originally owed to Wachovia, but was taken over by Wells Fargo. When Villareal’s husband went on disability and the family’s income stream dwindled, Wells Fargo sold the family an adjustable rate mortgage, a dangerous proposition that has become so destructive that it’s illegal in parts of the country. Adjustable rate mortgages are frequently targeted at low-income populations, often groups with little formal education and/or a language barrier.

Wells Fargo eventually ratcheted the interest rate to 8%, bringing monthly payments up to $5000. Villareal’s husband was forced to get off disability and is working under duress. Her children are also working to support the family. Villareal’s home has entered into the foreclosure. She’s currently asking that Wells Fargo give her a lower interest rate, a lower monthly payment, and a reduced principle. She adamantly insists that she doesn’t want anything for free — just the opportunity to pay for her home. The sale date for her home has been postponed indefinitely, but could be scheduled at any time. Monica Kenney’s story doesn’t go back as far, but it’s even more fraught with pain. Kenney purchased her first home in July 2008. “I realized a dream,” she said.

The Vienna Street home was 582 square feet and cost $352,000. The starting monthly payments on her loan from Wells Fargo were $2700. Kenney got the payments modified down to $2400 per month in 2009, but unforeseen disaster struck in January 2010 when she lost her job.

Over the course of the next eight months, she emptied her two retirement accounts to pay her house note, but by September, she was out of resources and still out of work. The following January, Wells Fargo told her that her home was in foreclosure, but that they were willing to work through the process with her. By now the way this story ends is a familiar refrain to anyone who’s followed the foreclosure crisis, but no homeowner assumes that she’ll be the one to fall. Kenney worked with the bank for months to come up with a solution, constantly being referred back and forth from department to department, from desk to desk, from phone call to phone call, never getting anywhere. She got the distinct impression that there was very little communication among different units within the bank, that she was being victimized by the bureaucracy. Finally, in June of last year, Wells Fargo offered her a forbearance. Essentially, they offered to let her pay $600 per month until she got a job, at which time her payments would revert to normal. The agreement would allow her to stay in her home while she weathered the storm of unemployment.Kenney agreed, and the plan was formalized in writing. She made her first $600 payment.

The next day the bank put her house up for auction. Wells Fargo has not returned that first payment to Kenney, and has refused to work with her to resolve the situation. Kenney was a victim of “dual-tracking,” a process that ACCE members have attacked publicly before, by which a bank pursues loan modification and foreclosure processes simultaneously, often without communication between the two divisions, often resulting in a home being sold even as an agreement is being reached to prevent foreclosure. Kenney’s home is now owned by Fannie Mae. Kenney hopes to work out an ­arrangement with Fannie Mae to get them to honor the forbearance agreement.

Kenney and Villareal led a small cadre of ACCE members and upset residents into the local Wells Fargo branch. Unlike past demonstrations and sit-ins, this one was quiet. But all was not lost. The regional manager for San Francisco happened to be in the office on Tuesday, and spent about a half-hour on the phone with his superiors and in conversation with Kenney and Villareal about the specifics of their situations. He made no promises, but said higher-ups at the bank would be in contact with ACCE, with Kenney, and with Villareal, and held out the possibility of hope. After three months, after three years, after fourteen years, that possibility was good news.