Sunday, July 26, 2026
Home Blog Page 480

Third-party candidate on the ballot in 50 states, files lawsuit

Demands inclusion in presidential debates

Gary JohnsonGary Johnson

Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate for President – who is currently polling at around 5 percent of the vote – and his vice presidential running mate, retired Judge Jim Gray, have filed an antitrust lawsuit against the Democrats, Republicans, & the Commission on Presidential Debates for antitrust and anti-competitive acts. The voters deserve competition! The lawsuit comes after the PDC’s failure to respond to the following letter from Johnson last month:

Dear [Commission Member]

I am writing to request that the national Commission on Presidential Debates reconsider your current exclusionary requirements for participation in this fall’s Presidential and Vice-Presidential debates.

I am well aware of the history and genesis of the Commission, including the reality that it was created largely by the respective national leadership of the Democrat and Republican Parties. While I respect and understand the intention to provide a reasonable and theoretically nonpartisan structure for the presidential debate process, I would suggest that the Commission’s founding, organization and policies are heavily skewed toward limiting the debates to the two major parties.

Many credible polls indicate that a full 1/3 of the electorate do not clearly identify with either of those parties. Rather, they are independents whose voting choices are not determined by party affiliation. That 1/3 of the voters, as well as independent-thinking Republicans and Democrats, deserve an opportunity to see and hear a credible “third party” candidate. I understand that there are a great many “third party” candidates, and that a line must be drawn somewhere. However, the simple reality of our Electoral College system draws that line in a very straightforward and fair way – a reality that is reflected in your existing criteria. If a candidate is not on the ballot in a sufficient number of states to be elected by the Electoral College, it is perfectly logical to not include that candidate in a national debate. If, on other hand, a candidate IS on the ballot in enough states to be elected, there is no logic by which that candidate should be excluded.

Nowhere in the Constitution or in law is it written that our President must be a Democrat or a Republican. However, it IS written that a candidate must receive a majority of the votes – or at least 50% – cast by electors, and that any candidate who does so, and otherwise meets the Constitution’s requirements, may be President.

As the Libertarian Party’s nominees for Vice-President and President, Judge Jim Gray and I have already qualified to be on the ballot in more than enough states to obtain a majority in the Electoral College, and we are the only candidates other than the Republican and Democrat nominees to have done so.

However, the Commission has chosen to impose another requirement for participation: 15% in selected public opinion polls. Unlike your other requirements, this polling performance criterion is entirely arbitrary. Requiring a certain level of approval in the polls has nothing to do with fitness to serve, experience or credibility as a potential President. Rather, it has everything to do with the hundreds of millions of dollars available to and spent by the two major party candidates, the self-fulfilling bias of the news media against the viability of third party candidates, and an ill-founded belief that past dominance of the Republican and Democrat Parties should somehow be a template for the future.

It is not the proper role of a non-elected, private and tax-exempt organization to narrow the voters’ choices to only the two major party candidates. To the contrary, debates are the one element of modern campaigns and elections that should be immune to unfair advantages based upon funding and party structure. Yet, it is clear that the Commission’s criteria have both the intent and the effect of limiting voters’ choices to the candidates of the two major parties who, in fact, created the Commission in the first place.

­Eliminating the arbitrary polling requirement would align the Commission’s procedure for deciding who may participate in the critical debates with fairness and true non-partisanship, and it would not disrupt the process or make it unmanageable. Rather, it would simply allow the participation of a two-term governor who has more executive experience than Messrs. Obama and Romney combined, who has garnered sufficiently broad support to be on the ballot in more than enough states to achieve a majority in the Electoral College, and who, without the help of party resources and special interests, has attracted enough financial support to qualify for presidential campaign matching funds.

I urge you to remove the partisanship from the debates, and allow the voters an opportunity to hear from all of the qualified candidates – not just those who happen to be a Democrat or a Republican.

Thank you.

Governor Gary Johnson

spot_img

Know your propositions

Your “yes” vote on one California proposition can save public education; a “no” vote on another can protect workers

by Zenei Cortez

Are you one of those voters who is absolutely sure for whom you are going to vote on November 6? Great!

Do you know how you are going to vote on the 11 propositions that will also be on the California ballot this year? If not, don’t worry. There is still time to study them and be an informed voter when you get into the ballot box.

What are propositions and why should you care?

In California, a ballot proposition is a proposed law that is presented to the voters for approval in a direct election. It can be a constitutional amendment or an ordinary statute. The California State Legislature can introduce propositions. But in a great example of what a democracy is, any California voter can put an initiative or proposition on the ballot if the qualifying steps are followed.

Now, if you are thinking, “I don’t have time to waste on figuring out my vote on the propositions. What difference does it make anyway?” Consider the following.

As far back as 1912, a proposition to abolish the death penalty failed to garner enough votes to pass. In 1979, there were 39 initiatives on the ballot and only three passed!

If you want an example that hits closer to home, consider Proposition 209, the California Civil Rights Initiative, which was passed in November 1996. It amended the state constitution to prohibit state government institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public constitution (think state college enrollment), public employment or public contracting.

And then there was Proposition 227, known as the English for the Children Initiative, which was passed in 1998. It effectively dismantled bilingual education in the state. This despite research that continues to show that bilingual works.

This year, two ballots demand your attention, and we hope your “yes” and “no” vote.

Proposition 30—the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act

Proposition 30 prevents $6 billion in schools cuts, puts money back into California’s schools and colleges, and protects students by keeping the school year from being shortened and class sizes increased. It also keeps cops on the street, balances the state budget and protects taxpayers and protects patient safety standards. Vote “YES” on Proposition 30.

Proposition 32—the Paycheck Protection Initiative

Proposition 32 is an attack on labor. It poses a threat to minimum wage, retirement pay, health care benefits, Workmen’s Compensation and many more workers’ safeguards. As written, proposition 32 effectively removes the right of unions to raise money for political campaigns in California. It only serves the very rich and large corporations. Vote ”NO” on Proposition 32.

To learn more about all of this year’s propositions, visit the California Secretary of State Web site: ­http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov.

Zenei Cortez is the Co-President of the California Nurses Association and Vice President of National Nurses United with 185,000 members across the USA.

spot_img

Jennifer’s upcoming series The Fosters being condemned by ‘One Million Moms’ group

­

by the El Reportero’s news services

Jennifer LópezJennifer López

The seemingly always-outraged group known as One Million Moms now has its sites set on Jennifer Lopez, or rather, her new ABC Family show “The Fosters”, because it follows “a lesbian couple and their diverse family.”

Though the show has yet to air a single episode or even film the pilot, the premise is enough to enrage the conservative watchdog group.

In a released statement, One Million Moms accused ABC of having “lost their minds” for continuing to grow the list of so-called “anti-family programs.

One Million Moms was also the group behind the protest of JC Penney when the company announced openly gay Ellen DeGeneres as a new spokesperson.

A portion of Christian groups latest statement:

ABC Family reported the comedy-drama pilot, working with the title “The Fosters,” is about two women raising a “21st century,” multi-ethnic mix of foster and biological kids. While foster care and adoption is a wonderful thing and the Bible does teach us to help orphans, this program is attempting to redefine marriage and family by having two moms raise these children together. One Million Moms is not sure how the explanation will be given on how the biological children were conceived. None of this material is acceptable content for a family show.

Hollywood is continuing to push an agenda that homosexuality is acceptable when scripture states clearly it is a sin. As Christians, the Bible also says that we must speak up against sin. If we remain silent then we are guilty of sin also.

Lopez will be an executive producer for the hour-long project.

­Casting has not been announced. It’s still in the pilot stage and hasn’t been picked up for a series yet. Let’s stop this dead in it its tracks.

One Million Moms is asking supporters to help write to ABC Family and urge them not to air programs such as Lopez’s which they claim promote anti-family agendas. They are also asking advertisers to pull commercials from the network as well.

The group has also taken issue with Skittles commercials, TV Land’s “The Soul Man”, ABC’s “666 Park Avenue”, Urban Outfitters stores, NBC’s “The New Normal”, Gap stores, both DC and Marvel Comics, and many other stores, ads, and programs.

Artists Unite to Save Argentina’s Endangered Patagonia Bird

Argentine actor Ricardo Darin and musician-composer Gustavo Santaolalla have collaborated on a documentary aimed at saving from extinction an endangered bird species endemic to Argentina.

“El Ocaso del Maca Tobiano” (Twilight of the Hooded Grebe) is the title of the documentary narrated by Darin – who had a starring role in “Son of the Bride” – with music by Santaolalla, who won back-to-back Oscars for the soundtracks of “Babel” and “Brokeback Mountain,” and who has joined the conservation campaign launched by the ecological organization Aves Argentinas (Argentine Birds).

The documentary is directed by the naturalists and documentary filmmakers Marcelo Viñas and Juan Maria Raggio and, according to the Argentine portal Infobae, will premiere Oct. 9 in Buenos Aires movie theaters and can later be seen on the Internet by registering with the Web site set up by the campaign.

The hooded grebe is a bird found in lakes and lagoons of Patagonia between November and March, and which migrates to the Atlantic coast for the Southern Hemisphere winter. (Reported by Hispanically Speaking News).

spot_img

Bats: Beyond mith and mistery

­by the El Reportero’s staff

Diego el Cigala (al centro -at center)Diego el Cigala (al centro -at center)

Conservation Speaker Series – Bats are the only mammal that can truly fly. They are the second largest group of mammals and can be found on every continent except Antarctica. Learn more about these fascinating creatures, their unique biology, and why there really is no reassure to fear them.

Join Oakland Zoo keepers as they talk about bats, myths, conservation, and the special care the Zoo’s bats receive. Program Fee: $10-$20 sliding scale. Tickets at the door. Oakland Zoo is located at 9777 Golf Links Road, Oakland, California. On Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, 6:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m. www.oaklandzoo.org.

Spanish Gypsy singer just nominated for his third Latin GRAMMY Bay Area debut

The Bay Area is thrilled with the news of Diego el Cigala’s much anticipated debut here this Fall. Noted as a pioneer for his unique approach to Latin American music forms such as the bolero, tango and Afro-Caribbean jazz, Cigala has deep roots in the culture of Spanish Gypsy flamenco.

And then he went on to win another for a more flamenco-oriented CD “Picasso en Mis Ojos” which featured guests such as the legendary Paco de Lucia and Latin jazz master Jerry Gonzalez. Returning to the bolero, his 2008 project “Dos Lagrimas” united him with giants of Cuban percussion Tata Guines and Changuito and established his ongoing collaboration with the musicians who will be appearing with him at Zellerbach: guitarist Diego del Morao, pianist Jaime Calabuch Jumitus, percussionist Sabú Porrina and Cuban bassist Yelsy Heredia.

This is Cigala’s first major North American tour and will include stops in Los Angeles, Berkeley, Miami, Chicago, Detroit, Vancouver, Toronto and New York City from October 20 through November 6, 2011.

On Sunday Oct. 23, 7 p.m., Zellerbach Hall, UC Berkeley Campus.

For tickets and information http://www.BayAreaFlamencoFestival.com or call (800) 838-3006. $30/$50/$75 (Tickets not available through Cal Performances).

Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor at Commonwealth Club

­In a rare public appearance, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor will discuss the need for a better-informed citizenry as well as her life, career, and views on the role of the U.S. Supreme Court. In conversation with former Chair of the Commonwealth Club Board of Governors, Dr. Mary Bitterman, Justice O’Connor will also share her thoughts on pertinent social issues ranging from the current election to abortion. They will discuss how these challenging issues may be resolved through civic education.

O’Connor, the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court, strongly believes that America suffers from a lack of civic education, and this is hurting Americans’ capacity to solve 21st century challenges. Justice O’Connor served on the Supreme Court for over two decades until her retirement in 2006.

 

spot_img

No more abuse, exploitation say domestic workers

­by Marvin Ramí­rez

Domestic workers march agains abuse and explotation.: (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)Domestic workers march agains abuse and explotation.­ (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)

One of the most unprotected segment of the U.S. work force, vented their frustration Friday the 13th on this month, to tell employers: No more abuses, no more exploitation.

A colorful mass of people comprised­ mostly of women of different ethnic groups marched from 24th Street and Mission and headed to 26th to Valencia Street and returned to Mission St. to end the march at the Women’s Building on 18th Street.

The march was intended to highlight the legal victories where domestic workers have won hundred of thousands of dollars in backpay from employers who fail to pay minimum wage and overtime.

The National Domestic Workers Alliance joined hundreds of workers from Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Washington DC, Miami, Seattle, Chicago, New York and Denver to share strategies, develop a national agenda, and march for ­domestic worker rights and dignity.

Domestic workers women march on Nov. 13 on Mission Street in route to the Women Building,: where they would be attending workshops to learn how to protect their labor rights. (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)Domestic workers women march on Nov. 13 on Mission Street in route to the Women Building, where they would be attending workshops to learn how to protect their labor rights. (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)

Immigra­nt women who work in other people’s homes are subject to many forms of exploitation and abuse. Some employers refuse to allow sick days or pay for overtime; often wages are less than the minimum wage.

For practical purposes, says a written declaration, these women have few enforceable legal protections. So some are getting together to support and protect each ­other.

A speaker from the AFL-CIO offered verbal support, but these workers are outside the reach of the labor movement — they are banding together to learn to demand their rights and negotiate for themselves.

They are looking into the creation of a California Domestic Worker Bill of Rights and build a national movement of domestic workers.

­­

spot_img

Arab Americans continue to face both stigma and acceptance

by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Michigan.— Arab and Muslim Americans continue to face an unusual degree of both discrimination and acceptance, according to a University of Michigan researcher who headed an in-depth study of the nation’s most visible Arab and Chaldean communities.

“The post-9/11 backlash against Detroit area Arab and Muslim Americans was strong and immediate,” says U-M researcher Wayne Baker, co-author of “Citizenship and Crisis: Arab Detroit After 9/11,” just published by the Russell Sage Foundation. “Detroit was drawn into the ‘War on Terror’ almost by political reflex and in many respects the impact is continuing.”

Baker, a research scientist at the U-M Institute for Social Research (ISR) and a professor at the U-M Stephen M. Ross School of Business, is part of the Detroit Arab American Study Team that includes U-M researchers Sally Howell, Ann Chih Lin, Andrew Shryock, Ronald Stockton, and Mark Tessler and Princeton University research Amaney Jamal. All are co-authors of “Citizenship and Crisis.”

In the book, the team explores how the cultural prejudices that have often marginalized the Detroit Arab community came to a head after 9/11, and analyzes how the Arab communities of metropolitan Detroit have continued to thrive despite significant backlash from the crisis.

“Arabs and Muslims living in the U.S. repeatedly face situations in which their countries of origin, or Arabs and Muslims generally, are cast as enemies of the cimaUnited States and its allies in the Middle East,” says Baker. “As a result, Arab Americans must continually prove themselves, assuring their fellow nationals that they belong here, that they are loyal, that they are not a threat to national security.”

As such, the book’s authors believe Arab Americans highlight the contradictions in the multicultural ethos that dominates the concept and practice of citizenship in the U.S. Arab Americans have been singled out for harsh treatment including selective surveillance, deportation, and detention without due process, as well as presumptive freezing of financial assets, vandalism, and personal insults. But they have also been the beneficiaries of the politics of inclusion and acceptance.

Detroit has seen the establishment of the Arab American National Museum, the expansion of Arab American community organizations, and the election and appointment of Arab and Muslim citizens to political office, the authors point out. The area has also seen new partnerships between Arab American civil rights organizations, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the U.S Department of Homeland Security, as well as the creation of Arab American and Islamic studies programs in area universities, and the founding and expansion of at least a dozen new mosques.

The Detroit Arab and Muslim communities have also faced additional challenges – the intensification of violence in Iraq, further dispossession and bloodshed in Gaza and the West Bank, a devastating Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006, and the continued scrutiny, suspicion, and tactical harassment of Arab and Muslim Americans by the law enforcement arms of their own government.

But the authors conclude ­that there are also good reasons for optimism, and for hope that the tensions between inclusion and stigma ultimately serve to bind the community, spurring efforts to organization and activism that are essential to the Detroit area Arab community’s success.

spot_img

Peruvian government accuses Chile of espionage

­

by the El Reportero’s news services

Alan GarcíaAlan García

Salvadoran authorities say at least 192 people were killed by floods and landslides that swept through the country last week.

El Salvador’s Civil Protection agency says in a statement that 89 of the victims were killed in the state of San Vicente, where days of heavy rains caused mud and boulders to sweep down the side of the Chichontepec volcano before dawn a week ago.

The agency said Sunday that dozens more remain missing. It says that more than 14,000 Salvadoran have been affected by the floods and mudslides that were indirectly linked to Hurricane Ida’s passage through the region.

Peruvian President Alan García cut short his trip to the Asia Pacific

Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Singapore, returning to Lima this morning to deal with a brewing spying case. Mr. Garcia abruptly announced his return—which comes a day earlier than had been scheduled—in order to publicly address an alleged incident of Chilean espionage involving an officer from the Peruvian Air Force. This newest diplomatic spat between the two countries had already provoked the cancellation of a meeting yesterday between President Garcia and his Chilean counterpart, Michelle Bachelet.

A Peruvian Air Force official Victor Ariza Mendoza, is accused of passing secret documents detailing Peru’s projected future military acquisitions to Chilean intelligence officers in exchange for money.

Obama’s new multilateralism founders on Honduras

When U.S. President Barack Obama addressed the Fifth Summit of the Americas in Trinidad on April 17 he pledged an era of equal partnership and a new chapter of engagement with the region that reflected his stated preference for multi-lateralism in regional affairs.

Seven months later, the administration’s patience with multilateralism appeared to have already worn thin, amid the failure of the efforts led by the main hemispheric Organization of American States (O.A.S.) to bring about a resolution to the Honduras coup crisis.

Obama has moved to re-assert the U.S. as the ultimate arbiter in Latin America, probably out of sheer frustration, but also at the cost of principle and in doing so has provoked a fresh rift with the region.

Zelaya backtracks as congress refuses to take orders

The ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya claims that the de facto president Roberto Micheletti breached and voided the Tegucigalpa-San José Agreement when he moved on Nov. 5 to install a ‘unity and national reconciliation’ government with himself as its head.

Few have taken note of the fact that Zelaya had by then already declared the agreement void, and had rejected an offer from Micheletti to overcome their differences.

This has thrown the international participants in the crisis into confusion.

Environmentalists alarmed by Puerto Rico policies

­SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – Sweeping from lush mountain rain forests to pristine beaches, a corridor of land protected by Puerto Rico’s last governor hosts dozens of rare and endangered species and was championed by celebrities who helped fight off resort proposals.

Now new Gov. Luis Fortuno has revoked the reserve as part of a drive to bring jobs and investment for the U.S. territory’s struggling economy. And activists see a broader pattern of looser protection for the island’s environment.

Fortuno’s Oct. 30 order allows large-scale development inside the 3,200-acre 1,300-hectare) parcel of land immediately north of El Yunque, the only tropical rain forest in the U.S. National Forest system.

(Latin News, AP and AQ Online contributed to this report)

spot_img

Soledad O’Brien detail her motivations in Producing Latino in America

by Soledad O’Brlen

I have only begun to tell our stories with “Latino in America”.

Let me start by saying I think it’s an enormous victory that a major network has enhanced its coverage of our community this year, culminating in this two-part, four-hour documentary.

I am also very proud to have co-authored with Rose Arce a book about our community, “Latino in America,” published in October by Celebra (Penguin USA).

Some of the chief goals of both projects were to initiate conversations about our community, enhance our visibility and start a conversation about relevant issues. Ali the comments thatThe NiLP Network drew make me feel as if we have been successful on all those fronts, just by having engaged you.

When I began to plan our project, I saw it as a news documentary about a vast population, people with roots in some 21 countries who had distinct histories and very different experiences. There is no way to do justice to that range of experiences, even with a number of pieces and an additional four hours of documentaries.

What my team decided was that we would call it “Latino in America” because it was not to be a documentary about history or descendency, as the term Hispanic might imply, but about what happens after we’ve arrived, about an American experience we share and an identity that is born of this country, one that brings together people with roots from all over the Latin world, people who predate the U.S. or came yesterday, people who have some shared values but don’t necessarily have similar racial or ethnic roots or even language.

IT’S ABOUT REAL PEOPLE

It is a storyabout a group of Americans and their U.S experience.

We also decided that, in the spirit of CNN, we were doing a NEWS documentary. That means that we follow real people through their human experiences wherever they may take them, their ups and d:owns and how they confront the greatest issues our community is facing, whether that be by achieving their dreams or confronting obstacles.

If they falter, we watch them falten When they succeed, we are there to record the moment.

Some of you have spoken about negative and positive images in the documentary and it is clear there is vast disagreement as to what each of those means. A lot of it reflects the socioeconomic status of the person defining the terms, their own life experience and the way they see media.

EDUCATORS HAILED US

Many educators have hailed us for telling the story of what an enormous sector of our young population is facing in overcrowded and underfunded schools that do not address their unique needs as children of families struggling with a host of economic, cultural and immigration issues.

Others would rather we had highlighted only success stories and stayed away from casting a spotlight on the struggles of our schoolchildren.

The same was true of immigration stories. So many in our community told us we could not do a story about Latinos without showing how our controversial immigration debate is tearing apart families and encouraging some folks to target the most vulnerable among us. Others wanted no immigration experiences because they considered them depressing.

At the end of the day, I am a journalist and I made every effort to report the unfolding drama of human beings in our community. I take many of your suggestions to heart and because we are not a community that fails to speak up when trouble is afoot.

I feel the same about teen dropout rates, suicide and teen pregnancy. Our community suffers disproportionately from these ills. Our rates are rising. They are higher than they are for other ethnic or racial groups and they are undercutting the lives of our young people.

I am surprised how many people have written on the NILP site and others that they wondered why we’d look at these issues in our community rather than some other community.

That tells me that Latinos, even leaders who make policy decisions, live unaware of exactly what the statistics are and I feel even more strongly that even our own community needs to be educated about what’s happening to too many of our children.

We need to challenge bad schools, shabby health education, even look at our own family dynamics. Not talking about these issues is not going to make them go away, nor is doing PR for those who have escaped them going to change the reality too many face.

The challenge, and it is one I certainly find daunting, is to discuss these issues in context. I did my level best this time. I have learned a lot and I continue to listen, have an open mind and learn more. I am continuing to tour this country many months after this project is over in hopes of getting more ideas, more input, continuing to educate myself about our community and its issues. I pledge to you that I continue my mission to illuminate the many good things about our culture and our life here.

There are many stories yetto be told, about our incredible successes, our astronauts and Congresspeople and Ivy League graduates, as well as how our schools are failing our future leaders. I have just begun to tell them. And, for every one of you who wanted more, I say thank you many times over for joining me in the fight to tell our story . . . and “stand by.”

[Soledad O’Brien is a CNN anchor and special correspondent. In addition to repointing and producing that network’s ~Latino in America,” she a/so respond for the recent CNN seri­es, “Black In America.” To view the full-length version of her commentary, go to www.hispanicilak.org. To view additional reactions to “Latino in America,” including remarks by RaUI Yzaguirre, visit The NILP Network at info@latlnopollcy.org. The Natilona/ Institute for Latino Policy (NILP) /s head quarter at 101 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10013-1933. Telephone: 1-800-590-2516].

spot_img

This is not a difficult concept!

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin J. Ramirez

NOTE FROM THE PUBLISHER – It’s an honor for me to introduce to you the following article that I am sure will open up your mind to understand matters of money that our secondary and university schools are not programmed to teach us.

And precisely now when the Financial Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives has just passed (Nov. 19) the bill of Senator Ron Paul, which will allow that the Federal Reserve bank be audited, this article will allow you to understand how it is that the money is created, and why the banks really do not loan you the money that you think they lent you.

“All the perplexities, confusion and distresses in America arise not from defects in the constitution or confederation, nor from want of honor or virtue, as much from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.”

– John Adams in a letter to Thomas Jefferson.

by Jerre Kneip

The Federal Reserve System is a private corporation owned by its 12 District Banks which are, in turn, owned by a limited number of stockholder banks, both foreign and domestic. The initial issue stock is not traded and ordinary investors cannot own it.

The Federal Reserve System (FED) and its member banks create the “money” of the United States, known as the “dollar”, out of thin air through their authority to issue credit. The FED and its member banks loan this credit to individuals, businesses and to the various levels of government, including the United States Treasury, for which they charge interest.

The United States Treasury issues debt instruments in the form of Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills which are purchased by investors, including the FED, which the Treasury is obligated to redeem at face value plus interest. All money of the United States is created and comes into circulation through this lending process, but only the Principle amount is created, all of which must be repaid with interest. But the Interest is never created; it must be obtained through additional borrowing.

The United States Mint prints and coins the currency of the United States. The Mint prints the millions of bills of all denominations and sells them to the FED at its cost of production (approximately 3Ç each) which, in turn, issues them to the banking system at their face value. Only a very small fraction of the money in circulation is in the form of paper currency or coins; the vast majority is in the form of book entries and is transferred electronically or by check.

Through this system the FED has no debt while the United States Treasury and many States and local governments are foundering on debt.

The term “money” is not defined in the Constitution for the United States; however, several of the clauses in the US Constitution that mention money are:

Article I, Section 8, Clause 2. The Congress shall have Power…To borrow Money on the credit of the United States. [Editor’s note – A BIG MISTAKE]

Article I, Section 8, Clause 5. The Congress shall have Power…To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.[Ed. note – If the Congress has the power to coin Money why should it borrow Money?]

Article I, Section 8, Clause 6. The Congress shall have Power…To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7. No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.

Article I, Section 10,  Clause 1. No State shall…coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debt.

The Founder’s understanding of the authority for the creation of money was stated in Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England as follows: “The coining of money is in all states the act of the sovereign power”.

In the United States, the sovereign power is vested in the People, who established their State governments which, in turn, drew up a contract between themselves – the Constitution for the United States of America – by which certain powers were delegated to the federal government, among them those stated above. Federal powers were further restricted by the adoption of the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights. At Amendment Article IX, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” and at Amendment Article X, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Nowhere in the Constitution is the Congress authorized to re-delegate any of its delegated powers to any other entity. Since the sovereignty resides in the people, the issue of the Medium of Exchange, that is, the Money, belongs to the people who have delegated that authority to their representatives, the Congress.

The solution to “All the perplexities, confusion and distresses in America” recognized by Adams, that we are experiencing today, should become obvious. Now the banks create the medium of exchange and loan it at interest to the government, creating perpetual debt and ultimate bankruptcy.

We must reverse the process.

The medium of exchange (money) must be created by the government for the benefit of the people and loaned at a fee to the banks, and to the States and local governments, and spent into circulation for the legitimate expenses of the government. The issue then becomes a technical problem of balancing the inflow of money to meet the needs of the productive capacity of the people through their conversion of resources into useful products and commodities.

The accompanying diagrams illustrate the processes – as it is now, and how it should be.

As illustrated, this system would provide the funds necessary for full employment of resources, both natural and human, with out inflation of the money supply. There would be no need 2for a tax on the industry or labor of the people since any excess in the money supply which might cause inflation, would be drawn off through small duties and excises. Improvement in production efficiencies would result in lowering of costs and rising of labor rates. The money supply would increase with the natural increase in the population and the increase in physical output. Savings would be invested in factors of production to share in the generated profits since there would be no compounding of interest by the banks, and there wo­uld be no benefit in speculation other than the risk of new ideas and ventures becoming new industries. Funds for major purchases such as homes or autos would be available at small fees to cover the cost of administration. There would be no need for taxes on property of any kind, either real estate or the product of labor. Prosperity would become a product of effort and ingenuity and not of speculative schemes, political influence and greed.

[Jerre Kneip is publisher of The Free Press “Serving the People who seek Truth, Liberty and Justice” since 1994. $25 for 12 monthly issues. For sample copy send $2 to The Free Press, P. O. Box 2303, Kerrville, Texas 78029]

spot_img

An entire generaton is at stake

by Janet Murguía

Though much attention has been paid to the growing diversity of the U.S. population and the vital role Latinos will play in our country’s future, it’s time to focus on a sobering, little-discussed fact: By 2030, Latino children will make up half of the U.S. child population living in poverty.

How can we allow such a large and growing group of our current and future population to continue down this road?

The answer is clear. We can’t.

Let’s examine the figures Since 1990, the number of Latinos under age 18 has doubled, making them one of the fastest-growing segments of the national population.

We are talking about U.S. citizens. More than 90 perent of these 16 million children were born here. Their growth projection is propelled not by immigration, but by U.S. birthrates. Latino children are clearly poised to become an even more critical portion of the country’s economic health, social well-being and political power.

But new data from the Population Reference Bureau paint a sad mosaic for their future, one that shows up to 44 percent of all U.S. children living in poverty in 2030 to be Hispanic.

That future is not so hard to believe when we consider the current predicament of Latino kids. Today, more than one-fourth of Latino children live in poverty. Three-fifths live in low-income families. More than one-fourth of Latino four-year-olds are not enrolled in early childhood education programs. Almost one-fifth have difficulty speaking English. One in five does not have health insurance.

About two out of every five teens and preteens are obese or overweight. Only 55 percent graduate from high school. And Latino youth are overrepresented in the juvenile justice system and adult jails.

The National Council of /La Raza/ has fought to overcome these major challenges through our youth programs, ensuring that Latino children have access to health care, a better education, fair housing and credit programs, an immigration system that does not tear families apart, and a reformed juvenile justice system. We are in crisis. More must be done.

To engage others in this effort, NCLR convened youth experts, policymakers ers and community leaders for the first time ever in the nation’s capital this month to develop a comprehensive policy agenda to address the well-being of Latino children.

­This isn’t an effort that should be confined to NCLR or the Latino community. Everyone needs to get involved. If our youth succeed, we all succeed. If they fail, we all fail. To reverse these unacceptable trends, there are countless ways individuals like you who are reading this can take action. You can:

Take a young person under your wing. Fight for better schools for all kids. Volunteer to teach English at your neighborhood center. Write to Congress and the president and ask for comprehensive immigration reform. Demand health care reform that includes all children, foreclosure prevention programs that keep families in their communities, and job programs that stabilize neighborhoods.

Each child in this nation, regardless of the color of her skin, the origin of his parents, and the neighborhood she grew up in, deserves the opportunity to claim a piece of the American Dream. All children should have the same opportunities for success that so many others take for granted. In a country as great as ours, we all deserve nothing less. Hispanic Link.

(Janet Murguía is president and CEO of the National Council of /La Raza/. Email her at opi@nclr.org) ©2009

spot_img