Monday, September 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 336

UN calls for decriminalizing drugs use worldwide

American press silence

by Justin Gardner
The Free Thought Project

A little-noticed public statement issued by the United Nations last week contains a dramatic shift in thinking on the issue of “illicit” substance use. After recommitting to the failed idea of prohibition just last year, the UN is now calling for the worldwide decriminalization of drug use and possession.

The statement, put out by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the U.S. is in the midst of a nonsensical debate over health care, calls for “ending discrimination in health care settings.” The WHO calls on states to end discrimination against “marginalized and stigmatized populations” in a variety of ways, and includes a blunt and rather shocking statement on the drug war.

“We, the signatory United Nations entities, call upon all stakeholders to join us in committing to taking targeted, coordinated, time-bound, multisectoral actions in the following areas. Supporting States to put in place guarantees against discrimination in law, policies, and regulations by… Reviewing and repealing punitive laws that have been proven to have negative health outcomes and that counter established public health evidence. These include laws that criminalize or otherwise prohibit…drug use or possession of drugs for personal use.”

This is an admission that the problem of drug abuse is a public health issue, not a criminal justice issue. Locking people in cages for the victimless behavior of ingesting substances arbitrarily deemed illegal by the State does nothing to reduce drug use or supply, as evidenced by the utter failure of the War on Drugs.

Prohibition has also denied people the miraculous healing powers of cannabis. For decades medical research of cannabis was stifled by a drug war borne of racism and political suppression. But research has increased exponentially in recent years as governments around the world take steps to decriminalize this medicinal plant, notably among states in the U.S.With this awakening have come amazing stories of healing through cannabis, such as stopping seizures in children with debilitating epilepsy, treating post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans where all other treatments have failed, and healing a host of other illnesses without the dangerous side-effects of pharmaceutical drugs.

In terms of health care, prohibition is truly discriminatory, and the drug war only degrades public health.

Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001 and it has been a resounding success. Drug usage rates, addiction rates, overdose deaths and sexually transmitted diseases have all declined.

The WHO statement is also notable because it contradicts the UN’s reaffirmed support of prohibition during their 2016 “special session on drugs.” The special session was the first to be held in almost two decades, and many were expecting a softened approach from the failed war on drugs.

Despite the pleas of countries like Mexico—suffering from horrendous black market drug violence—to “move beyond prohibition,” a prohibition framework remained in place. In the UN’s 1998 ‘special session on drugs’ the world body agreed to work toward a “drug free world” by 1998. The sheer lunacy of this position is blatantly obvious now more than ever. Despite decades of prohibition and trillions of dollars spent, drugs remain easily accessible.

The WHO statement comes at a time when the U.S. drug war is in a pivotal moment. More and more U.S. states are decriminalizing cannabis at both the medicinal and recreational level, putting themselves at odds with the ongoing federal prohibition of cannabis as a Schedule 1 narcotic. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a well-known rabid prohibitionist, is taking steps to ramp up the drug war, calling for increased police measures and prison sentences—even though this approach is proven as a failure.

There is little hope that Sessions and other drug warriors around the world—such as Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte who is now having his police forces murder drug users on the spot (with the explicit blessing of Trump)—will pay any attention to the WHO call for decriminalization. Nevertheless, the WHO statement is an encouraging sign that the tide has turned against prohibition. As the drug war is dismantled piece by piece—in Portugal, U.S. states, Mexico (which recently legalized medical cannabis) and Canada (soon to legalize recreational cannabis)—the wisdom of ending prohibition will become ever more obvious.

spot_img

Guantanamo child detainee receives apology, $10 million from Canada

The former child prisoner will be compensated for abuses he suffered while he was detained by the US in Afghanistan and Guantanamo Bay

by Jessica Corbett

Toronto-born Omar Khadr—who was captured by the U.S. military in 2002 when he was just a teenager and held at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba—will receive an apology and reportedly $10.5 million ($8 million USD) from the Canadian government for failing to protect him from abuse while he was detained for more than a decade.

Khadr sought $20 million from the Canadian government in a civil suit, and the Toronto Star reports that last month his attorneys met with representatives from Canada’s Department of Justice to finalize the settlement details. A federal source told the Globe and Mail that the apology and compensation are expected this week.

Prominent Canadians, activists and newspaper editorial boards have rallied behind Khadr for several years through public statements, visits to MPs, a parliamentary petition, and a letter writing campaign. Following reports of the upcoming apology and compensation, Laura Pitter, senior national security counsel at Human Rights Watch, tweeted: “This is fantastic news! Hope it sends signal to US about healing power of apology, redress.” Journalist Glenn Greenwald said on Twitter: “At least Canada pays & apologizes for its gross abuses. US courts have shamefully refused all suits, citing secrecy.”

CBC Radio-Canada shared the reactions of human rights groups:

“For 15 years Omar Khadr’s case has been a stark reminder of the many ways that an overreaching and unchecked approach to national security readily runs roughshod over universally protected human rights,” said Alex Neve, secretary general of Amnesty International Canada.

Neve said Khadr’s rights were violated or ignored in Afghanistan, at Guantanamo Bay and in Canadian prisons, and that U.S. interrogators, jailors and officials refused to recognize him as a child soldier.

The previous Conservative government offered “inflammatory rhetoric” instead of making an effort to help him, Neve said.
The National Council of Canadian Muslims said it would welcome a “long overdue” apology and compensation.

“It is the right decision in light of the callous and unlawful treatment meted out to Mr. Khadr with the complicity of Canadian officials,” NCCM executive director Ihsaan Gardee said in a news release.

Addressing reporters from Dublin on Tuesday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said: “There is a judicial process underway that has been underway for a number of years now and we are anticipating, like I think a number of people are, that that judicial process is coming to its conclusion.” Trudeau, who has garnered criticism for his silence on the topic, did not comment on the compensation.

Once the youngest detainee at Guantanamo Bay, Khadr, now 30, says he suffered various abuses—including beatings, sleep deprivation, rape threats, and being forced to urinate on himself—during at least 142 interrogations in Afghanistan and Guantanamo.

Khadr’s defense team has maintained that he was pushed into fighting by his father, Ahmed Said Khadr, a supposed associate of Osama bin Laden who was killed in 2003. Khadr was shot and captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan in July 2002, at the age of 15, after a firefight.

He was accused of throwing the grenade that killed Delta Force Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Speer, though those charges were never proven. After being detained and interrogated at a U.S. prison in Bagram, Afghanistan, for three months, Khadr was transferred to Guantanamo Bay, where he remained for 10 years.

In 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canadian officials had interrogated Khadr under “oppressive circumstances”—after three weeks of sleep deprivation while in U.S. custody—then shared evidence with U.S. officials, which “offends the most basic Canadian standards about the treatment of detained youth suspects.” However, the court also ruled that it could not force the Canadian government to request that the U.S. send Khadr back to Canada.

The Bush administration, and then the Obama administration, fought to convict Khadr of war crimes. As part of a Pentagon plea deal that capped his sentence at eight years and would allow Khadr to return to Canada after serving some time in the U.S., he told a Guantanamo Bay military commission that he threw the grenade and pled guilty to five charges.

Khadr has since has told reporters he is uncertain whether he threw the grenade, and pleaded guilty so he could return to Canada. The Star has published classified photos that suggest the then-teen was buried in rubble when Speer was killed. In 2012, Khadr was transferred to back Canada, where in May 2015 he was released on bail to live with his attorney’s family, after nearly 13 years behind bars.

spot_img

Increased cases of child abuse in Guatemala

by the El Reportero’s wire services

A total of 708 cases of child abuse were reported so far in Guatemala by the Judicial Organization, said the newspaper La Hora on its website.

In 2009, when the crime ‘Abuse against minors’ was included in the ‘Law against sexual violence, exploitation and human trafficking’, 26 cases were presented to the various jurisdictional institutions.

Norma Ramirez, attorney from the department of Children and Teenagers of the Public Ministry, said in a communiqué that one of the reasons leading to increased reports is that the people’s awareness has risen compared to previous years.

Ramirez also said that the staff of the Attorney Office for Children and Teenagers must be increased due to the high amount of reports received daily.

Guatemala has two agencies and eight attorney assistants to investigate child abuse, empowered only to handle cases of the capital city’s municipalities.

The attorney office said that in 85 percent of the cases the offender is one of the parents or someone very close to the family.

Peru: investigation into former president opened

Five ministers of former President of Peru Alan Garcia´s cabinet will be questioned by the attorney´s office, as part of an investigation for corruption into García, while difficulties prevail to extradite former President Alejandro Toledo.

According to sources from the Public Ministry quoted by the local media, the summonses include four junior officials of the latest management of García (2006-2011), during the investigation into the tender of the electric train in Lima.

The tender for the project was given to Brazilian company Odebrecht, with which Garcia had free-flowing ties, that admitted briberies during the management of García, as well as Alejandro Toledo (2001-2006) and Ollanta Humala (2011-2016).

The nine former officials from the Garcia´s management were summoned as witnesses, while former minister of Transportation Jorge Cuba and other junior officials remain in prevention detention as they were pointed by Odebrecht as the recipients of part of the bribery ($8 million USD) given for the aforementioned project.

Meanwhile, Rafael Vela, coordinator attorney for Money Laundering, expressed concern about the delay of Judge Abel Concha, who has not presented at the United States justice a warrant arrest for former president Toledo.

Guatemala court orders ex governor sent back to Mexico to face charges he denies

Extradition ordered, Duarte coming home Guatemala court orders he be sent back to Mexico to face charges he denies

A court in Guatemala yesterday ordered the extradition of Javier Duarte to face charges of embezzlement and ties to organized crime.

The former Veracruz governor attended his third hearing yesterday in Guatemala City, this one for federal charges, where he denied them all and agreed to be extradited to Mexico.

Mexican authorities expect he will be sent back in two weeks.

Duarte’s attorney, Carlos Velázquez, said his client agreed to face the charges in order to get to the truth. He said Duarte was the victim of political persecution.

Yesterday’s was the second of two hearings to review the evidence against the former governor, suspected of embezzling billions of pesos. Duarte also agreed to extradition at the first hearing, which heard evidence from state of Veracruz prosecutors.

Evidence was given at the hearings showing he had set up shell companies, made dodgy real estate deals and bought a yacht in the United States.

“I did not commit these crimes and I wish to prove so before the judicial authorities in my country,” Duarte said.

spot_img

Boxing Schedule – The Sport of Gentlemen

JULY 1, 2017
O2 Arena, Greenwich, London, UK (Sky)
Frank Buglioni vs. RickySummers
Matthew Ryan vs. Ted Cheeseman
Ballsport, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany (MDR)
Dominic Boesel vs. Karo Murat
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico (TyC / VTV)
Luis Cusolito vs. Victor Proa
France
Karim Guerfi vs. TBA
JULY 2, 2017
Suncorp, Brisbane, Queensland, Austrailia (PPV)
Manny Pacquiao vs. Jeff Horn
Jerwin Ancajas vs. Teiru Kinoshita
Umar Salamov vs. Damien Hooper
Shane Mosley Jr vs. David Toussaint
Michael Conlan vs. Jarrett Owen
JULY 7, 2017
Tampa, FL, USA (Telemundo)
Sammy Valentin vs. TBA
TBA (ESPN Deportes)
“Golden Boy Boxing”
JULY 8, 2017
Copper Box, Hackney Wick, London, UK (BoxNation)
Billy Joe Saunders vs. Avtandil Khurtsidze
Darryll Williams vs. Jahmaine Smyle
Asinia Byfield vs. Sammy McNess
Gary Corcoran vs. Larry Ekundayo
Braehead Arena, Glasgow, Scotland, UK (5)
Josh Taylor vs. Ohara Davies
Jason Easton vs. Steve Jamoye
Zapopan, Jalisco, Mexico (Televisa)
Mariana Juarez vs. Terumi Nuki
JULY 14, 2017
Buffalo Run, Miami, Oklahoma, USA (Showtime)
Antoine Douglas vs. Bruno Sandoval
Kenneth Sims Jr vs. Rolando Chinea
Ivan Baranchyk vs. Keenan Smith
Glenn Dezurn vs. Adam Lopez
Joshua Greer Jr vs. Leroy Davila
Los Angeles, CA, USA (Estrella)
“LA Fight Club”
JULY 15, 2017
Forum, Inglewood, CA, USA (HBO / BoxNation)
Miguel Berchelt vs. Takashi Miura
Jezreel Corrales vs. Robinson Castellanos
Joe Smith Jr vs. Sullivan Barrera
Nassau Coliseum, Uniondale, NY, USA (PBC on FOX)
Omar Figueroa Jr vs. Robert Guerrero
Jose Pedraza vs. Jamel Herring
Marcus Browne vs. Sean Monaghan
Artur Szpilka vs. Adam Kownacki
Eric Walker vs. Patrick Day
Wembley, Wembley, London, UK (ITV)
Chris Eubank Jr vs. Arthur Abraham
Wild Horse Hotel, Chandler, AZ (Facebook Live)
John Vera vs. Daniel Cruz
Rico Ramos vs. Juan Lopez
Abel Ramos vs. Emmanuel Robles
JULY 21, 2017
Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina (CN23)
Isidro Ranoni Prieto vs. TBA
JULY 29, 2017
Barclays, Brooklyn, NY, USA (Showtime)
Mikey Garcia vs. Adrien Broner
Jarrett Hurd vs. Austin Trout
AUGUST 4, 2017
Chukchansi Park, Fresno, CA, USA (UniMas)
Jose Carlos Ramirez vs. TBA
TBA (ESPN2 / ESPN Deportes)
“Golden Boy Boxing”
AUGUST 11, 2017
Argentina (TyC / VTV)
Caril Herrera vs. Julio Escudero
Sebastian Papeschi vs. Francisco Torres
AUGUST 15, 2017
Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan (beIN)
Shinsuke Yamanaka vs. Luis Nery
AUGUST 18, 2017
TBA (ESPN Deportes)
“Golden Boy Boxing”
AUGUST 26, 2017
StubHub Center, Carson, CA, USA (HBO / BoxNation)
Miguel Cotto vs. Yoshihiro Kamegai
SEPTEMBER 9, 2017
California, USA (HBO)
Wisaksil Wangek vs. Roman Gonzalez
Ekaterinburg, Russia
Shane Mosley vs. Magomed Kurbanov

spot_img

Mexican population grew more than a million in one year

by the El Reportero’s wire services

The Mexican population has grown one percent in one year, equivalent to 1,200,000 inhabitants, and reached 122,300,000 people by late 2016, it was reported today.

The data correspond to the last national household survey conducted by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), according to which women predominate in Mexico.

According to reports from the statistical agency, the country’s population has rosen from 121,100,000 people in 2015 to 122,300,000 in 2016.
Of these figures, about 51.4 percent are women and 48.6 percent are men. Of that total, nearly 23.2 percent live in rural areas and 76.8 percent lives in urban localities.

INEGI estimates that Mexico has about 32.9 million households, 1,100,000 more than in 2015, and they are made up, on average, by 3.7 members.
The average age of the head of households is 48.7 years and in almost one of three households (27.3 percent) the head is a woman.

SICA summit preparatory technical meeting begins

Directors of foreign policy from the member nations of the Central American Integration System (SICA) began today in this capital the preparatory technical meeting for the 49th Summit of Heads of State and Government of the regional mechanism.

According to the Costa Rican Foreign Ministry, experts will prepare the final statement to be approved by the presidents at the end of the summit, which begins today and will conclude on Thursday this week.

Tomorrow will be the turn of foreign ministers and presidents will have theirs on Thursday.

Host President Luis Guillermo Solis and the presidents of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Panama and the Dominican Republic have confirmed their attendance, while those of Nicaragua and Belize will be represented at the meeting by their foreign ministers.

During the summit, Costa Rica will hand over SICA’s presidency pro tempore to Panama, which will take over in the second half of the current year.

The regional mechanism has the main objective of achieving the integration of Central America, to turn it into a Region of Peace, Freedom, Democracy and Development, and is the institutional framework for the Central American Regional Integration, created by Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama.

Airlines in Mexico Fined for Illegal Charges to Passengers

The Federal Attorney’’s Office of Consumer (PROFECO) has imposed fines on Volaris, Interjet, Aeroméxico, VivaAerobus and JetBlue Airways for improper charges to passengers, it was known today.

A statement from PROFECO explains that the sanctions were the result of charging the first suitcase of passengers documented on flights from Mexico City to the United States and Canada.

The Office of the Attorney General said that it has open proceedings against United Airlines and American Airlines for the same infraction, which will be resolved in the coming days.

It also pointed out that the measure applied by airlines contravenes provisions of the Federal Consumer Protection Law, the Civil Aviation Act, and its regulations.

Likewise, it was determined that the sanctioned companies have engaged in misleading advertising, discriminatory acts, abusive clauses in their adhesion contracts and other practices that violate the rights of passengers.

The fine totaled 22.4 million pesos (about one million 200 thousand dollars).

spot_img

California’s very expensive free lunch?

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:

El Reportero welcomes any opinions contrary to the statements made in the following article regarding ‘single payer’ health insurance.

by Marilyn M. Singleton, M.D., J.D.

California’s state senate’s unipartisan passing of a sweeping single-payer health care bill, the Healthy California Act, has drawn attention to single payer as a solution to the decaying Affordable Care Act. The ACA decreased competition and plan availability in health insurance and leaves patients holding the bag of unaffordable premiums, deductibles, and copays. It’s no surprise that a majority of state residents polled were in favor of universal, government-run health care — as long as it doesn’t raise their taxes.

But as the fanfare died down, pragmatists in the state assembly put the bill on hold as “woefully incomplete.”

The unrealistic bill provides that every California resident, regardless of age, employment, or immigration status, would be eligible for coverage with no premiums, copayments, or deductibles. Additionally, patients could see any “willing” provider without a referral and receive any service deemed medically appropriate, including chiropractic, vision, dental, ancillary health or social services, and National Institutes of Health-approved alternative therapies. Insurers are only allowed to offer coverage for services that are not offered by the state.

“Providers” would be paid on a fee-for-service basis unless and until the Healthy California board establishes another payment methodology. The government thus has the unilateral ability to fix prices and payment methods – including State IOUs.

According to the California senate’s own study, the estimated cost of the single-payer program is $400 billion, while California’s total budget for 2018 is $179.5 billion. The bill naively or slyly makes no mention of funding. The top contenders are (of course) a 15 percent employer tax, a 2.3 percent sales tax increase, a 2.3 percent gross receipts tax, and existing healthcare-directed federal, state, and local funds.

California’s default funding method is fleecing the taxpayers and then redirecting targeted tax revenues. Recently, voters approved California’s 2016 Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act, which added a $2 per pack tax because the funds would go to physician training, disease prevention, medical research, Medi-Cal, and tobacco-use prevention and reduction. Gov. Brown now plans to shift some of the revenue to the general fund.

And then there’s the lure of the Golden Bear. The Supreme Court ruled in Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa County [Arizona] that the one-year residence requirement to receive free non-emergency medical services from the county violated the Equal Protection Clause by creating an “invidious classification” that impinges on the right of interstate travel by denying newcomers “basic necessities of life.” California has three border states and a large border country. If the Supreme Court has their say, the law could cover every soul who has a foot on California’s golden soil. Who will pay for the free-riders after the middle class has been taxed out of the state?

It is no wonder the assembly wants the senate to provide a “workable legislation that addresses financing, delivery of care, and cost control.”

Let’s face it. Why would we trust the government to manage our medical care? The obvious example is the Veterans Health Administration. Congress has introduced a staggering 1,440 bills relating to veterans’ health since January 1, 2017. Several of these bills are directed toward the ability to fire demonstrably incompetent or rule-breaking employees who have remained on the job for years and receive pensions and bonuses.

The real tragedy is that the call for single payer ignores what patients really want. Deloitte’s 2016 Consumer Priorities in Health Care Survey found that patients overwhelmingly wanted “personalized provider interactions”. Of course, with a universal, government-run system comes universal privacy eradication and intrusion into our medical records. Secondly, people wanted “economically rational coverage.” They did not say free; they just want value for their dollar. They want convenient access. None of these things will be found in a government-run health care factory staffed by “willing” providers.
In truth, single payer is not a cure for a broken system, but another manifestation of the attempt to depersonalize patients and doctors and convert them to obedient participants trapped in a system with no exit. They will have no choice but to ignore the reality that when the government runs out of money and the taxpayers are drained dry, payments and services will be reduced.

We must think local. Tap into physicians love and joy in delivering charity care, and use insurance for its intended purpose: major unexpected expenses. Most importantly, ensure that patients and physicians can always deal directly with one another in an atmosphere of a trusting personal relationship.
With time to reflect, let’s hope our legislators realize that losing the hallmarks of good medicine is not worth of cost of free single payer.

(Dr. Singleton is a board-certified anesthesiologist and Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Board member. She graduated from Stanford and earned her MD at UCSF Medical School.

Dr. Singleton completed 2 years of Surgery residency at UCSF, then her Anesthesia residency at Harvard’s Beth Israel Hospital. While still working in the operating room, she attended UC Berkeley Law School, focusing on constitutional law and administrative law.  She interned at the National Health Law Project and practiced insurance and health law.

She teaches classes in the recognition of elder abuse and constitutional law for non-lawyers).

spot_img

The persecution of the most vulnerable for political gain

As we enter into the fifth month of the presidency of Donald Trump, immigrant communities would have been the most hit by the new law just passed by the House.

As this edition goes to press, the news of a bill backed by Trump to crack down on undocumented immigrants passed the U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday, drawing criticism from immigration activists and others who called them a threat to civil liberties.

The target is the so-called “Sanctuary City,” a status designated by local government to protect undocumented immigrants who are jailed for whatever minor offenses, even for traffic violations.

The House voted 228-195 to pass the “No Sanctuary for Criminals Act” that would withhold some federal grants to so-called “sanctuary city” jurisdictions that do not comply with certain federal immigration laws.

Also passed was “Kate Law, ” named for Kate Steinle, who was shot dead in San Francisco in 2015 by an undocumented immigrant who had been deported five times.

It must be noted that it is well-known undocumented labor is part of the daily life in the United States, and restaurant chains, construction companies, private homes, etc., utilize these men and women to perform jobs most American won’t do. And so, they are part of the growing economy in the country. And they are not criminals. However, with so many laws mining our lives, anyone may hit one of them and get arrested for a violation.

And the sad thing is that when someone runs for public office they try to blame the easiest target, so they find a perfect one in undocumented people. But it is not fair to continue inflicting pain to millions who had left their countries to serve and help the US economy with their low-cost labor that most citizens won’t do. And this anti-Sanctuary Law really unfairly hurt the most vulnerable.

The legislators and politicians know that these sanctuaries don’t protect the criminal, it just protects the person from being automatically deported without the benefit of due process – a right to see a judge, a process that is guaranteed in a democracy and in the Constitution.

Sanctuaries provide some protection for undocumented immigrants under laws that limit how much cooperation local police may have with federal immigration authorities.

The “No Sanctuary for Criminals Act” prohibits sanctuary cities from adopting policies that restrict police officers from asking individuals about their immigration status or the immigration status of others.

Imagine that a hateful neighbor wants to take revenge against his undocumented neighbor because he has a pretty wife, and calls the police on the guy, and accuses him of selling drugs, when in fact is a fabrication. So he is arrested.

Well, the sanctuary protection will not notify the immigration, rather, the suspect will be investigated and probably released after it is found that he is innocent. So the wife and his children didn’t lose their loved one. The family remained intact. But now all this could change.

And although both bills will need approval from the Senate to become law, the panic will already be spread onto the community.

Texas is going through its own persecution case of Latinos.

A federal judge will hear arguments to decide whether the harsh anti-sanctuary cities law will take effect in September.

Anger at Texas’ strict new immigration law simmered as a thousand Latino policymakers and advocates gathered in Dallas this weekend, ahead of a hearing in which civil rights groups will ask for the measure to be blocked.

A federal court in San Antonio will hear arguments on Monday, with Judge Orlando García to decide whether to grant a preliminary injunction that would stop the law, known as SB4, from taking effect on Sept. 1.

SB4 is in some aspects redolent of Arizona’s SB1070, a “show me your papers” law that was passed in 2010 but largely neutered by court challenges. Conference-goers in Dallas also recalled California’s Proposition 187, a measure passed by voters in 1994 that would have denied social, health and educational services to undocumented immigrants. It was swiftly halted in court.

The Texas law would in effect ban “sanctuary cities” – places that offer limited or no cooperation with immigration authorities – by criminalizing and fining officials who do not accede to requests to hold immigrants for federal pick-up and potential deportation.

The human face of the case is that many people enter the US without documents because sometimes they are too poor to qualify for a visa in their country, and because visas are almost impossible to obtain. The requirements are too high for this people to fulfill. They just want to work, work and work, and so they cross the border for survival.

I feel for those many – who probably have been living in the country for decades and have no criminal record – that will be victimized by this law, and who will leave their families behind for petty offenses such as traffic violations.

And also for those businesses that benefit from low-cost labor, which allow them to keep consumer prices low for the general public.

And with this I am not endorsing the presence of those who are real criminals who deserve to be taken away. But to soften those harden hearts.

Why cannot this government pass to another page by embracing everyone and start a new chapter of reconciliation? Why every administration has to go through the same process of persecuting the most vulnerable, in the name of security?
(News services contributed to this article).

spot_img

Green beans: Health benefits

by Megan Ware RDN LD

Green beans, string beans, or snap beans are a rich source of vitamins A, C, and K, and of folic acid and fiber. They have similar nutritional benefits to snap peas and okra.

Bean farmers harvest green beans while the beans are still in their pod before they have had a chance to mature.
Nutritional content

Consuming fruits and vegetables of all kinds can help reduce the risk of many adverse health conditions.

Many studies have suggested that including more plant foods, such as green beans, in the diet decreases the risk of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and overall mortality.

Consumption of fruit and vegetables also promotes a healthy complexion, increased energy, and overall lower weight.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Nutrient Database, one standard cup of canned snap beans (about 150 grams)
contains:
28 calories
0.55 grams of fat
5.66 grams of carbohydrate
2.6 grams of fiber
1.94 grams of sugar
1.42 grams of protein
In terms of nutrients, it contains:
17 milligrams (mg) of calcium
1.2 mg of iron
18 mg magnesium
30 mg of phosphorus
130 mg potassium
24 micrograms (mcg) of vitamin A
52.5 mcg of vitamin K
32 mcg of folate

However, one cup of drained canned snap beans also contains 362 micrograms of sodium. Consumers should rinse canned beans before use. For the best source of nutrients and lowest sodium, choose fresh or frozen greens beans for cooking.

Green beans also contain folate, thiamin, riboflavin, iron, magnesium, and potassium.

Health benefits

The nutrients provided can help reduce the risk of a number of health conditions.

Cancer

Green beans contain a high amount of chlorophyll.

This may block the carcinogenic effects of heterocyclic amines that are generated when grilling meats at a high temperature. Individuals who prefer their grilled foods charred should pair them with green vegetables to decrease the risk.

Fertility and pregnancy

For women of child-bearing age, consuming more iron from plant sources such as spinach, beans, pumpkin, and green beans appears to promote fertility, according to Harvard Medical School.

Other studies have shown a correlation between a woman’s level of fertility and the level of according to, including iron, that she consumes.
Pairing iron-rich foods with vitamin C-rich foods like tomatoes, bell peppers, or berries can improve iron absorption.

Adequate folic acid intake is also needed during pregnancy, to protect the fetus against neural tube defects. One cup of green beans provides approximately 10 percent of daily folic acid needs and 6 percent of iron.

Depression

Meeting daily folate needs may also help with depression.

Adequate folate consumption can prevent an excess of homocysteine in the body.

Too much homocysteine can stop blood and other nutrients from reaching the brain, and it can interfere with the production of the feel-good hormones serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine, which regulate mood, sleep, and appetite.

Bone health

A low intake of vitamin K is associated with a higher risk of bone fracture.

Adequate vitamin K consumption improves bone health by modifying bone matrix proteins, improving calcium absorption, and reducing urinary excretion of calcium.

One cup of green beans provides 14.4 micrograms of vitamin K, or almost 20 percent of the daily requirement, 4 percent of a person’s daily need for calcium.

It is important to remember that it is not the individual vitamins, minerals, or antioxidants alone that make vegetables like green beans such an important part of our diet.

It has been proven that isolating these healthful nutrients in supplement form will not provide the same outcomes. It is best to consume them as part of a healthy, varied diet.

How to incorporate more green beans into the diet

Green beans are available fresh, frozen, or canned. It is important to rinse and drain canned beans, as this reduces the sodium content by up to 41 percent.

Fresh beans should be crisp and bright green in color. Refrigerating them in a bag can maintain freshness.

spot_img

Standing up for all of our students – everyone’s responsibility

by Devin Dillon, Interim Superintendent of the Oakland Unified School District (OUSD)

As I look back on the school year, I’m proud to work for one of the most diverse school districts in the country. More than half of the students in the Oakland Unified School District speak a language other than English at home.

Yet this school year was also one of the toughest for immigrant and refugee families in our district. After the election, we started hearing from many of our students that they were afraid for themselves and their families.

In the midst of this climate of fear, we knew that the school district needed to take action.

During the past school year, the Oakland Unified School District took important steps to stand behind all of our students and families, regardless of immigration status.

The district reaffirmed its status as a sanctuary school district. It also joined an amicus brief backing Santa Clara County in its lawsuit against President Trump’s executive order that threatened to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities.

As a lifelong educator and the Interim Superintendent, it’s my job to make sure that nothing gets in the way of our children’s education.

That’s why it is important for all students and families in Oakland to know that this is a sanctuary district. That means we do not ask for or require proof of legal immigration status upon enrollment, nor is any such information gathered by our schools.

Together, we affirmed our commitment to doing everything possible to ensure students and their families are safe at school, no matter where they were born or what barriers they have overcome to be here.

There are also steps you can take to see what kinds of immigration relief you might qualify for – and to get help covering the cost of legal services and application fees.

If you live or go to school in Oakland, you can access free or low cost legal services through the Oakland Immigration Project, a project led by trusted immigration organizations serving Oakland. The Oakland Immigration Project aims to help qualified Oakland immigrant families apply for immigration relief and work authorization to open the door to economic stability and success.

At this critical time, I want to reaffirm our values as a school district that is welcoming to all students. Together, we will continue to protect all of our students so they can access a quality education.

To access free or low cost legal services in Oakland, go to: www.oaklandimmigrationproject.org. For more information on what the Oakland Unified School District is doing, stay tuned to our website at: www.ousd.org.

spot_img

A new farmworker union is born

MOUNT VERNON, WA - 15JUNE17 - Members of Familias Unidas por la Justicia vote to ratify a contract negotiated with Sakuma Brothers Farms after four years of strikes and boycotts. Copyright David Bacon

Indigenous Oaxacan farm workers win themselves a union in the Pacific Northwest

by David Bacon

Bob’s Burgers and Brew, a hamburger joint at the Cook Road freeway exit on Interstate 5, about two hours north of Seattle, doesn’t look like a place where Pacific Northwest farm workers can change their lives, much less make some history. But on June 16, a half-dozen men in work clothes pulled tables together in Bob’s outdoor seating area. Danny Weeden, general manager of Sakuma Brothers Farms, then joined them.

After exchanging polite greetings, Weeden opened four folders and handed around copies of a labor contract that had taken 16 sessions of negotiations to hammer out. As the signature pages were passed down the tables, each person signed. Weeden collected his copy and drove off; the workers remained long enough to cheer and take pictures with their fists in the air. Then they too left.

It was a quiet end to four years of strikes and boycotts, in which these workers had organized the first new farm-worker union in the United States in a quarter-century-Familias Unidas por la Justicia (FUJ).

The union itself will not be like most others. At the ratification meeting held the previous night, many of the people packed into the hall of Mt.
Vernon’s Unitarian Church spoke with each other in Mixteco or Triqui. Members of Familias Unidas por la Justicia come originally from towns in Oaxaca and southern Mexico where people speak indigenous languages that were centuries old when the Spanish colonized the Americas.

“We are part of a movement of indigenous people,” says Felimon Pineda, FUJ vice president. An immigrant from Jicaral Cocoyan de las Flores in Oaxaca, he says organizing the union is part of a fight against the discrimination indigenous people face in both Mexico and the United States: “Sometimes people see us as being very low. They think we have no rights. They’re wrong. The right to be human is the same.”

According to Rosalinda Guillen, director of Community2Community, an advocacy organization that helped the workers organize, “Indigenous culture plays a huge role, especially people’s collective decision-making process. The strong bonds of culture and language give the union a lot of its strength.”

Sakuma Brothers Farms hires about 450 workers every year to pick its strawberries and blueberries from June through October, in its fields in Burlington and Mt. Vernon, Washington. About half live in the local area, and half come north for the picking season from Santa Maria, Madera, Livingston, and other farm-worker towns in California. The migrants from the south live in the company’s labor camps for the duration of the work.

Almost all Sakuma workers arrived from Mexico years ago, and have been living in the United States ever since.

Almost all Sakuma workers arrived from Mexico years ago, and have been living in the United States ever since. They depend on this seasonal job picking berries for a large part of their yearly income.

In 2013, workers grew angry about a low piece rate and bad conditions in the labor camps, and protested to company managers. One was fired and told to leave the camp where his family was living. The rest of the company’s workers then stopped the harvest to get his job and housing back. In the weeks that followed they began negotiating with the farm’s owners, the Sakuma family. They elected a committee to speak for them, which became the nucleus of Familias Unidas por la Justicia.

In the course of negotiations, the workers discovered that the company had recruited 78 laborers in Mexico, and brought them to the United States under the H2A visa program. These contracted workers could only work for the employer that recruits them, and could only stay for the duration of a work contract limited to several months, after which they had to return to Mexico.

“In 2013, the wages for the H2A workers were $12 an hour, and our wages were $9.37,” says Ramon Torres, one of the original strikers. “When we found that out, our first demand was that we get the same pay.”

Under the H2A program rules, employers have to show they can’t find workers in the United States before they can recruit contract workers abroad. After the 2013 picking season ended, Sakuma Farms sent letters to the workers involved in the work stoppages, saying they’d been terminated for missing work. The farm then applied to the Department of Labor for visas to bring in 479 workers-enough to replace its entire workforce.

Torres calls this a watershed moment for the workers, whose response to Sakuma’s visa request was brilliantly effective. “We wrote letters, to prove to the government that we were ready to work. When people heard that the company was saying that they couldn’t find any workers, everyone signed the letter. Everyone. We filled out 489 letters.”

After union members and supporters handed in the letters at Department of Labor offices in San Francisco, Seattle, Washington, D.C., and Chicago, the company withdrew its application. With no H2A workers to pick the berries, it was forced to rehire the strikers for the 2014 season. “That made our members even stronger in their support for the union,” Torres says. “Everyone understood then that the company wanted to replace us, and that we needed a union to protect ourselves. That made our struggle easier.”

This article was cut to fit space. To view the entire article, please visit:

http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com/2017/06/a-new-farm-worker-union-is-born.html

spot_img