Sunday, March 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 21

New campaign demands action for babies left to die after failed abortions in Alberta

Government data reveal dozens of babies survive late-term abortions in Alberta hospitals each year – only to be left to die without care

by Richard Dur

Prolife Alberta recently launched LeftToDie.ca, a campaign built on what government data has consistently revealed: babies are being born alive after failed late-term abortions in Alberta hospitals – only to be left to die.

Government data shows at least 28 such cases in the past year (20 the year before, and 26 the year before that). The babies born alive after failed abortions are the survivors of a targeted, intentional procedure meant to end their lives in utero. They are delivered after 20 weeks or more – but against all odds, they emerge alive. They breathe. They move. They whimper. And yet they are abandoned without care.

No doctors rush to help. No nurses reach out. Only the quiet hum of the machine – not the steel of an incubator, but the machinery of protocol, paperwork, and moral failure. And the silence of those who turn away.

Children, swallowed by indifference. Not in darkness, but under the bright fluorescent lights of a hospital room. And the imprimatur of Alberta’s Health Services. With them dies humanity.

It is no secret that Prolife Alberta is strongly opposed to abortion – the practice of killing babies in the womb. But LeftToDie.ca is not about abortion. These human beings have already survived the attempt on their lives in the womb, only to be abandoned to death – after birth, outside the womb.

What is at stake here is simple – and yet it is everything: ensuring that when a child is born alive – breathing, moving, whimpering after birth – she receives the same care as any other newborn. Revising AHS health policies that permit otherwise would not regulate or restrict abortion in any way. But it could save a newborn child’s life.

The plea here is simple: revise provincial health protocols so that every newborn is treated as a patient, not a problem. Whether a child lives minutes, hours, or years, she deserves care and a chance at life – not abandonment.

It is also no secret that Alberta Premier Danielle Smith identifies as “pro-choice” on abortion. But this is not about abortion. It is about children who have already been born and then left to die – a disturbing reality Alberta’s premier once recognized and said so herself.

Twenty-five years ago, as a columnist for the Calgary Herald, Danielle Smith called the abandonment of babies born alive after failed abortions a “horrific practice.” She was right.

But words are no longer enough. A commentator may speak. A leader must act. And Danielle Smith is no longer a commentator. She is premier of Alberta. And every day her government does nothing, the silence grows louder, and the death toll of Alberta’s littlest citizens mounts.

If the breath of a child is not enough to stir us, what will be? Rarity is no excuse for injustice. Even one child left to die unnecessarily is one too many. And if we do not protect a child who is born alive, what does that say about us? About you, about me, about Danielle Smith – about us who call ourselves alive?

The silence has lasted long enough. It is time to end it – and to let the cries of children once left to die be heard.

Visit LeftToDie.ca to break the silence and protect children born alive.

Richard Dur is the volunteer executive director of ProLife Alberta and an award-winning political consultant with campaign experience across Canada. ProLife Alberta.

Richard Dur is the volunteer Executive Director of Prolife Alberta and an award-winning political consultant with experience on campaigns across Canada.

spot_img

Immigrant potential: America’s hidden strength ignored by Trump

by Marvin Ramírez

Marvin Ramírez, editor

In the ongoing debate over immigration, there is an overlooked truth that deserves serious consideration: the untapped potential of immigrants who grew up in the United States, but who remain undocumented through no fault of their own. These individuals were brought here as children, raised in American schools, nurtured by American values, and they love this country as deeply as any citizen. Yet, despite their dedication, the current administration has chosen to treat them as outsiders, pursuing deportations with little regard for the human and economic loss such actions create.

The United States has long thrived on the energy, discipline, and creativity of immigrants. To deny this reality is to deny the nation’s own history. Today, undocumented youth and long-term residents represent a resource of strength, not weakness. Many of them already contribute as essential workers, students, innovators, and community leaders. Their only barrier to full participation in society is a piece of paper that declares them unrecognized under the law.

What makes this particularly pressing is the recognition that the military itself has raised the idea of granting citizenship to non-citizens who serve in the armed forces. If the military is willing to acknowledge the loyalty, discipline, and sacrifice that immigrants are ready to offer in defense of this country, why is the administration unwilling to extend the same recognition to those who have grown up as Americans in every sense but legal status?

Consider this: these young men and women are already Americans in heart and in practice. They recite the Pledge of Allegiance, study the nation’s history, and often speak only English. Many of them dream of serving in the armed forces, becoming police officers, teachers, or professionals who strengthen their communities. Instead of investing in them, we are forcing them into the shadows or sending them away. And for what? To later seek out new immigrants to rebuild the very workforce and sense of commitment we already have at our fingertips?

If the administration is determined to secure borders and defend sovereignty, what better way to do so than to allow these aspiring Americans to put on the uniform and serve? Granting them a path to citizenship through service would both strengthen the military and honor the values of fairness, sacrifice, and opportunity that define this nation. It would also be a practical solution, ensuring that those who have already proven their loyalty and moral character are not wasted, but instead harnessed for the country’s future.

No policy can change the fact that these individuals already call America home. The question is whether the government will continue to treat them as strangers or finally recognize the reality that they are part of the American fabric. To deport them is to discard potential soldiers, workers, and leaders. To embrace them is to invest in the nation’s strength.

The Trump administration should reconsider its current approach and explore the wisdom of granting these immigrants—particularly those brought here as children—the opportunity to earn citizenship through service and contribution. Doing so would not be an act of charity, but an act of national interest. The United States stands to gain loyal citizens ready to defend and build the country they already love. The time to acknowledge this truth is now.

spot_img

USMCA’s 2026 review expected to tilt toward bilateral talks

The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) is up for a formal review in July 2026, but internal discussions have already begun. (Shutterstock) -- El Tratado entre Estados Unidos, México y Canadá (T-MEC) se revisará formalmente en julio de 2026, pero las conversaciones internas ya han comenzado.

by the El Reportero’s wire services

Mexico’s Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard signaled on Tuesday that the 2026 review of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) will likely rely more on bilateral negotiations than on trilateral discussions.

Ebrard’s comments followed similar remarks by U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who said the upcoming review of the free trade pact will “probably” proceed on a bilateral track.

Speaking at an event in Mexico City, Ebrard explained that it is normal for USMCA discussions to take shape in bilateral formats. “These talks always have a high bilateral component for natural reasons,” he said, noting that each country has unique trade relationships within the broader framework of the accord.

“As an example, Mexico is the principal exporter of tomatoes to the U.S., while Canada’s dominant export is lumber,” the minister said. “So there are many issues we manage separately, whether with the United States or with Canada.”

He added that Mexico also holds bilateral discussions with Canada on issues such as mining, while some topics — like the pact’s dispute settlement system — remain trilateral.

The 2026 review will mark six years since the USMCA replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). During his first presidency, Donald Trump had floated the idea of scrapping NAFTA in favor of two separate trade deals, one with Mexico and another with Canada, though that plan was never realized.

Trade between the three countries amounts to nearly $2 trillion annually, according to the U.S. Trade Representative. However, the agreement has come under strain this year as the Trump administration reintroduced tariffs on Mexican and Canadian exports, including steel, aluminum, and vehicles.

Washington’s Position
Greer elaborated on the U.S. perspective during remarks at the Economic Club of New York, where he said the U.S. intends to use the review to address specific frictions with each partner. World Trade Online reported his view that a bilateral format would allow Washington to pursue its goals more effectively.

His statements came shortly after both Mexico and the United States invited public input on the future of the agreement.

Last month, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum hosted Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in Mexico City, where both leaders pledged to reinforce the trade pact, according to El País.

Trump, however, has repeatedly criticized the agreement, citing the U.S. trade deficits with both Mexico and Canada. He has also linked the deal to border security concerns, pressing the neighboring governments to act against narcotics trafficking, especially fentanyl. In recent weeks, he has indicated that he does not simply want a review, but a renegotiation of the accord.

Former U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, who helped craft the original deal during Trump’s first term, echoed that sentiment in Mexico City last week. According to Bloomberg columnist Juan Pablo Spinetto, Lighthizer suggested that the 2026 revision will be “far tougher than most investors and strategists expect.”

“What began as a scheduled six-year review,” Spinetto wrote, “is rapidly transforming into a full renegotiation, one that will require considerable patience and skill from Mexico to safeguard its interests.”

Challenges Ahead
Adding to the uncertainty, a report from the U.S. State Department released in September highlighted that Mexico has yet to issue necessary implementing regulations in multiple USMCA areas. The absence of these rules, the report said, is complicating operations for industries such as telecommunications, financial services, and energy.

With the clock ticking toward 2026, the tone set by leaders in Washington and Mexico City suggests that while the USMCA remains intact, the road ahead could prove more turbulent than many stakeholders once anticipated.

With information from La Jornada, El Financiero and El País.

spot_img

Hidden power of fig leaves: The natural remedy you’re ignoring

by the El Reportero’s staff

Often overlooked and discarded, fig leaves—leaves from the Ficus carica tree—are emerging as a natural ally for health enthusiasts and researchers alike. While the fig fruit has long been celebrated for its taste and nutritional value, its leaves are now gaining recognition for their medicinal potential, supported by both traditional knowledge and modern science.

Fig leaves are large, roughly textured, and fragrant when crushed. They have been used for centuries across cultures—from ancient Greece to traditional Chinese medicine—to treat a variety of ailments, including digestive issues, respiratory problems, and skin conditions. In Mexico, grandmothers continue to use fig leaves to regulate blood sugar or soothe muscle pain.

The secret lies in the leaves’ rich array of bioactive compounds. They contain flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, and coumarins, which offer antioxidant, antibacterial, and anti-inflammatory effects. Additionally, fig leaves provide essential vitamins such as A, B1, and C, along with minerals like calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, and zinc. These nutrients work together to support overall wellness and bolster the immune system.

Health benefits backed by research

One of the most notable benefits of fig leaves is their ability to aid in blood sugar management. Studies have shown that compounds in the leaves help regulate glucose absorption and improve insulin sensitivity, potentially reducing the need for medication in some individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Digestive health also benefits from fig leaves. Their fiber content and mild laxative properties promote regular bowel movements, while certain bioactive compounds help protect the gastrointestinal tract. Fig leaf extracts have been found to reduce gastric damage and encourage healing of the stomach lining, offering relief for those with ulcers.

Heart health may improve through regular consumption of fig leaf infusions or extracts. Research suggests they can lower total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, maintain healthy blood pressure, and protect blood vessels. Anti-inflammatory properties make them useful for easing joint and muscle discomfort, including arthritis-related pain.

Additional advantages include strengthening the immune system, purifying skin, and enhancing hair health. Topical applications or homemade masks using fig leaf extracts can aid in treating acne, minor burns, or eczema.

How to use fig leaves

For internal use, fig leaf tea is the most common method. Boil two to three dried leaves in a liter of water for about ten minutes and enjoy, ideally on an empty stomach or before bed. Fresh leaves can also be crushed and applied as poultices for insect bites, swelling, or minor skin infections. Extracts or lotions made from the leaves offer a natural topical remedy for various skin concerns.

Precautions and storage

While generally safe, fig leaves can interact with medications for diabetes or high blood pressure, so consultation with a healthcare professional is recommended before regular use. Leaves are best harvested during spring and summer, selecting healthy, green specimens. They should be dried in a shaded, ventilated area and stored in glass jars or paper bags away from light and moisture.

Incorporating fig leaves into daily routines can provide simple, natural support for multiple health concerns. Though often overlooked, these leaves are a hidden gem in the world of herbal remedies—proving that sometimes nature’s remedies are right outside our window.

With reports by Lilo, Comunicóloga por la UNAM. Redactora de temas de bienestar general.

spot_img

California issues historic fine over lawyer’s ChatGPT fabrications

A courtroom at the San Diego County Superior Court in San Diego on Oct. 9, 2023. Photo by Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters -- Una sala del Tribunal Superior del Condado de San Diego en San Diego el 9 de octubre de 2023. Foto de Adriana Heldiz, CalMatters

The court of appeals said 21 of 23 quotes in an opening brief were fake. State authorities are scrambling to grapple with widespread use of artificial intelligence

by Khari Johnson

A California attorney must pay a $10,000 fine for filing a state court appeal full of fake quotations generated by the artificial intelligence tool ChatGPT.

The fine appears to be the largest issued over AI fabrications by a California court and came with a blistering opinion stating that 21 of 23 quotes from cases cited in the attorney’s opening brief were made up. It also noted that numerous out-of-state and federal courts have confronted attorneys for citing fake legal authority.

“We therefore publish this opinion as a warning,” it continued. “Simply stated, no brief, pleading, motion, or any other paper filed in any court should contain any citations— whether provided by generative AI or any other source—that the attorney responsible for submitting the pleading has not personally read and verified.”

The opinion, issued 10 days ago in California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal, is a clear example of why the state’s legal authorities are scrambling to regulate the use of AI in the judiciary. The state’s Judicial Council two weeks ago issued guidelines requiring judges and court staff to either ban generative AI or adopt a generative AI use policy by Dec. 15. Meanwhile, the California Bar Association is considering whether to strengthen its code of conduct to account for various forms of AI following a request by the California Supreme Court last month.

The Los Angeles-area attorney fined last week, Amir Mostafavi, told the court that he did not read text generated by the AI model before submitting the appeal in July 2023, months after OpenAI marketed ChatGPT as capable of passing the bar exam. A three-judge panel fined him for filing a frivolous appeal, violating court rules, citing fake cases, and wasting the court’s time and the taxpayers money, according to the opinion.

Mostafavi told CalMatters he wrote the appeal and then used ChatGPT to try and improve it. He said that he didn’t know it would add case citations or make things up.

He thinks it is unrealistic to expect lawyers to stop using AI. It’s become an important tool just as online databases largely replaced law libraries and, until AI systems stop hallucinating fake information, he suggests lawyers who use AI to proceed with caution.

“In the meantime we’re going to have some victims, we’re going to have some damages, we’re going to have some wreckages,” he said. “I hope this example will help others not fall into the hole. I’m paying the price.”

The fine issued to Mostafavi is the most costly penalty issued to an attorney by a California state court and one of the highest fines ever issued over attorney use of  AI, according to Damien Charlotin, who teaches a class on AI and the law at a business school in Paris. He tracks instances of attorneys citing fake cases, primarily in Australia, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

In a widely-publicized case in May, a U.S. district court judge in California ordered two law firms to pay $31,100 in fees to defense counsel and the court for costs associated with using “bogus AI-generated research.” In that ruling, the judge described feeling misled, said they almost cited fake material in a judicial order and said “Strong deterrence is needed to make sure that attorneys don’t succumb to this easy shortcut.”

Charlotin thinks courts and the public should expect to see an exponential rise in these cases in the future. When he started tracking court filings involving AI and fake cases earlier this year, he encountered a few cases a month. Now he sees a few cases a day. Large language models confidently state falsehoods as facts, particularly when there are no supporting facts.

“The harder your legal argument is to make, the more the model will tend to hallucinate, because they will try to please you,” he said. “That’s where the confirmation bias kicks in.”

A May 2024 analysis by Stanford University’s RegLab found that although three out of four lawyers plan to use generative AI in their practice, some forms of AI generate hallucinations in one out of three queries. Detecting fake material cited in legal filings could get harder as models grow in size.

Another tracker of cases where lawyers cite nonexistent legal authority due to use of AI identifies 52 such cases in California and more than 600 nationwide. That amount is expected to increase in the near future because AI innovation is outpacing the education of attorneys, said Nicholas Sanctis, a law student at Capital University Law School in Ohio.

Jenny Wondracek, who leads the tracker project, said she expects this trend to get worse because she still regularly encounters lawyers who don’t know that AI makes things up or believe that legal tech tools can eliminate all fake or false material generated by language models.

“I think we’d see a reduction if (lawyers) just understood the basics of the technology,” she said.

Like Charlotin, she suspects there are more instances of made up cases generated by AI in state court filings than in federal courts, but a lack of standard filing methods makes it difficult to verify that. She said she encounters fake cases most often among overburdened attorneys or people who choose to represent themselves in family court.

She suspects the number of arguments filed by attorneys that use AI and cite fake cases will continue to go up, but added that not just attorneys engage in the practice. In recent weeks, she’s documented three instances of judges citing fake legal authority in their decisions.

As California considers how to treat generative AI and fake case citations, Wondracek said they can consider approaches taken by other states, such as temporary suspensions, requiring attorneys who get caught to take courses to better understand how to ethically use AI, or requiring them to teach law students how they can avoid making the same mistake.

Mark McKenna, codirector of the UCLA Institute of Technology, Law & Policy praised fines like the one against Mostafavi as punishing lawyers for “an abdication of your responsibility as a party representing someone.” He thinks the problem “will get worse before it gets better,” because there’s been a rush among law schools and private firms to adopt AI without thinking through the appropriate way to use them.

UCLA School of Law professor Andrew Selbst agrees, pointing out that clerks that work for judges are recent law school graduates, and students are getting bombarded with the message that they must use AI or get left behind. Educators and other professionals report feeling similar pressures.

“This is getting shoved down all our throats,” he said. “It’s being pushed in firms and schools and a lot of places and we have not yet grappled with the consequences of that.”

spot_img

Mexico and US launch Mission Firewall to stop cross-border gun trafficking

México y Estados Unidos lanzan la Misión Firewall para detener el tráfico transfronterizo de armas

by Mexico News Daily 

Mexico and the United States announced on Saturday the launch of a new bilateral initiative aimed at disrupting the southward flow of illicit weapons across the Mexico-U.S. border.

Mexican and U.S. officials thrashed out the details of the joint project — called “Mission Firewall: United Against Firearms Trafficking Initiative” — at the inaugural meeting of the Mexico-U.S. Security Implementation Group, held last Friday in McAllen, Texas.

The establishment of the binational security group was announced earlier this month during U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit to Mexico.

The group is set to meet regularly to coordinate joint security actions and operations.

Mexico’s Foreign Ministry (SRE) said in a statement that the “main goals” of Mission Firewall include:

  • Increasing border operations to prevent weapons from entering Mexico.
  • Expanding use of the eTrace tool to strengthen firearms investigations in both countries.
  • Implementing ballistic identification technology across all 32 states of Mexico.
  • Strengthening information sharing between Mexican and U.S. authorities.
  • Increasing investigations and prosecutions of criminal cases involving firearms.

The U.S. State Department said that the U.S. would “increase inspections and coordination with Mexico to stop the southbound flow of firearms.”

It described Mission Firewall as “an ambitious bilateral effort to combat illicit firearms trafficking through an unprecedented level of collaboration between both nations.”

Many of the hundreds of thousands of firearms smuggled annually into Mexico from the United States end up in the hands of members of notorious drug cartels. They use the weapons to commit violent crimes, including murder.

The Mexican government has long called on its U.S. counterpart to do more to stem the southward flow of weapons, and has complimented the Trump administration for heeding that message. It also sued a number of United States-based gun manufacturers and distributors, accusing them of negligent business practices that have led to illegal arms trafficking and deaths in Mexico. The United States Supreme Court threw out Mexico’s US $10 billion lawsuit in June, but the Mexican government has continued to push U.S. authorities to crack down on arms trafficking to Mexico, where guns are only sold legally at two army-run stores.

On Monday, President Claudia Sheinbaum said that for “years” the United States “didn’t accept” that the trafficking of weapons from the U.S. to Mexico was a “problem,” or “did the Fast and Furious operation [in Mexico] with the consent of the then [president Felipe] Calderón.”

Now, “for the first time, the United States recognizes that it has to do operations to control … the illegal trafficking of weapons to Mexico,” she said.

The agreement to conduct Mission Firewall is “very important,” Sheinbaum said.

The United States Ambassador to Mexico, Ron Johnson, said on social media on Saturday that “for the first time,” the U.S. and Mexico were “implementing joint inspections, real-time info-sharing, and expanded investigations to stop weapons fueling cartels.”

“… Mission Firewall marks a new chapter in U.S.–Mexico cooperation,” he wrote.

The meeting in McAllen

The meeting in McAllen, a border city opposite Reynosa, Tamaulipas, took place just over three weeks after Rubio held security talks with Sheinbaum and other Mexican officials in Mexico City. He subsequently said that the U.S. and Mexico were “amplifying” their security cooperation in order to combat organized crime groups and the narcotics they traffic on both sides of the border.

The State Department said that representatives from six U.S. government agencies and their Mexican government counterparts attended the meeting in McAllen on Friday.

The SRE said that the U.S. government reported on the progress that has already been made to stop arms trafficking to Mexico. The ministry said that U.S. officials reported that since January, the Trump administration has “opened more than 125 arms trafficking investigations, seized firearms, and identified suspected members of criminal networks involved in this crime on U.S. territory.”

At the meeting, the Mexico-U.S. Security Implementation Group also announced “the formation of a bilateral working group to combat cross-border illicit finance and cooperate on civil asset forfeiture,” according to the State Department.

It also said that “at Mexico’s request, the United States has created a first-of-its-kind secure platform to allow information sharing regarding suspicious air shipments and packages to identify and interdict illicit drugs, chemical precursors, firearms, and illicit fuels.”

The ramping up of security cooperation between Mexico and the United States comes as U.S. President Donald Trump continues to pressure the Mexican government to do more to combat cartels and stop narcotics, especially fentanyl, from reaching the U.S.

So-called “fentanyl tariffs” that Trump imposed on non-USMCA compliant imports from Mexico in March remain in effect.

Sheinbaum has said on countless occasions that her government is willing to cooperate and collaborate on security issues with its U.S. counterpart, but won’t accept subordination or any violation of its sovereignty. She revealed in May that she had declined an offer from Trump to send the U.S. army into Mexico to combat cartels, and has ruled out the possibility of the U.S. “invading” the country or bombing cartel targets.

spot_img

San Francisco Department of Elections launches comprehensive testing of voting equipment ahead of November 4 Special Election

Photo credit: CBS News.

Community event

SAN FRANCISCO, Wednesday, September 24, 2025 – The San Francisco Department of Elections will begin Logic and Accuracy testing of the city’s voting equipment on Friday, September 26, continuing until all devices have been thoroughly examined. These tests are a critical step in ensuring that the November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election proceeds smoothly, with every vote accurately recorded and counted.

Testing will take place at the Department’s warehouse at Pier 31 and in the Ballot Processing Room at City Hall, Room 48. These locations will allow election officials to check every machine in conditions similar to those used on Election Day, including the ImageCast Evolution Ballot-Scanning Machine, the ImageCast X Ballot-Marking Device, and the ImageCast Central Scanner—all of which will undergo rigorous evaluation.

“Transparency at every stage of the election process is essential to safeguarding integrity and building public confidence in our local elections,” said Director John Arntz. “We remain committed to openness and accountability and invite the public to observe our procedures before, during, and after Election Day.”

Mandated by state law, Logic and Accuracy testing ensures that all voting equipment correctly records and tabulates votes, identifying and addressing any potential errors or malfunctions in advance. The process involves running test ballots through every machine, verifying that results match expectations, and confirming the reliability of tabulation systems.

Members of the public are encouraged to observe the testing in person at the locations listed above or via livestream on the Department’s website at sfelections.gov/observe. A detailed calendar of observable activities related to the November 4 election is also available online, providing opportunities for residents to witness everything from ballot preparation to equipment testing.

For more information on observing election processes, contact the Department of Elections at (415) 554-4375, email sfvote@sfgov.org, or visit the office in City Hall, Room 48. These efforts underscore San Francisco’s commitment to a transparent, secure, and trustworthy election process, ensuring that voters can participate with confidence.

spot_img

OECD follows IMF and raises Mexico’s economic growth outlook for 2025

Tanto el FMI como la OCDE atribuyeron la tendencia alcista de México a la fortaleza de su mercado externo, con exportaciones que hasta ahora se mantienen firmes pese a la incertidumbre de la política comercial de EE.UU. (Shutterstock)

by El Reportero

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) raised its forecast for Mexico’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2025, doubling its estimate from 0.4 to 0.8 percent. For 2026, it expects growth of 1.3 percent, up from a previously estimated 1.1 percent.

The upgrade comes shortly after the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised upward its forecast for Mexico’s GDP for this year to 1.0 percent, a sharp turnaround from its April forecast of -0.3 percent. The IMF projects growth of 1.5 percent in 2026.

The “OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report September 2025,” released Tuesday, highlighted stronger-than-expected exports despite global trade volatility. However, it warned that “the full effects of tariff increases have not yet been felt,” with early signs of inflation in consumption, labor markets, and global prices.

Regarding inflation, the OECD raised its forecast for Mexico in 2025 to 4.2 percent, up from 3.4 percent previously. For 2026, it anticipates moderation to 3.6 percent, noting persistent but easing pressures. The organization urged the Bank of Mexico (Banxico) to remain “vigilant” in the face of evolving risks, although it noted that monetary easing via rate cuts could sustain demand.

Along with resilient exports, lower interest rates could bolster growth in 2026, complementing trade dynamism. The OECD also called for maintaining fiscal discipline to ensure debt sustainability and maintain room for maneuver in future crises.

Risks persist, it warned, such as tariff increases, fiscal liabilities, and volatile crypto assets that could destabilize financial markets. Even so, the organization emphasized that Mexico’s external sector remains a stabilizing force in the face of trade tensions.

— With reports from El Economista, Mexico Business, and El País.

In other unrelated news:

US designates another Latin American gang as a terrorist organization

Listed as “one of the largest in the region”

The United States government designated Barrio 18 as a foreign terrorist organization on Tuesday, linking it to attacks against authorities and civilians in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio described Barrio 18 as “one of the largest gangs” in the region. Guatemalan media note that its name comes from a street in Los Angeles, California, where it originated.

“This measure demonstrates once again the Trump Administration’s unwavering commitment to dismantling cartels and gangs and ensuring the safety of the American people,” Rubio said in a statement.

In May, Washington had already designated the Haitian groups Viv Ansanm and Grand Grif as terrorist organizations. Earlier, in February, shortly after Trump took office, the US designated the Sinaloa Cartel, the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG), the United Cartels, the Northeast Cartel, the Gulf Cartel, and La Nueva Familia Michoacana as terrorist organizations, along with El Salvador’s Mara Salvatrucha and Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua.

spot_img

Mexico captured 24% of US import market that China lost between 2018-2024

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (SHCP) indicated that Mexico now has a comparative advantage of 35.6 percentage points over China in terms of the effective tariff rates applicable to both countries' exports to the United States. (Shutterstock)--La SHCP indicó que México ahora cuenta con una ventaja comparativa de 35.6 puntos porcentuales sobre China en términos de las tasas arancelarias efectivas aplicables a las exportaciones de ambos países a Estados Unidos. (Shutterstock).

by Peter Davies

Mexico News Daily

China’s loss is Mexico’s gain.

Between 2018 and 2024, the value of China’s exports to the United States declined by 18.5%, falling from US $538.5 billion in the former year to $438.95 billion in the latter year. China’s share of the U.S. market for imports declined significantly as a result.

According to Mexico’s Finance Ministry (SHCP), Mexico captured 24% of the U.S. market for imports that China lost in the 2018-2024 period.

The figure is included in the SHCP’s 2026 budget proposal, a 93-page document that was submitted to Congress earlier this month.

U.S. protectionism against Chinese goods helped Mexico to increase its share of the United States’ market for imports in recent years, allowing it to overtake the East Asian economic powerhouse as the top exporter to the world’s largest economy in 2023 and maintain the enviable position ever since.

Mexico’s share of the U.S. market for imports increased two percentage points between 2018 and 2024 to reach 15.5% while China’s share declined 7.8 percentage points to 13.4%.

The SHCP believes that Mexico now has an even greater opportunity to capture a bigger share of the U.S. market for imports, given that the Trump administration has recently increased tariffs on imports from China, a country known colloquially as “the world’s factory.”

Mexico’s trade advantage widens 

According to the SHCP, the United States’ “effective tariff rate” on imports from China between 2018 and 2024 was 6.6 percentage points higher than its effective tariff rate on imports from Mexico, which, along with the U.S. and Canada, is party to the USMCA free trade pact.

The difference in the effective tariff rates “allowed Mexico to gain around 24% of the participation” in the U.S. market for imports that China lost, the ministry said.

The SHCP said that Mexico now has a “comparative advantage” of 35.6 percentage points over China in terms of the effective tariff rates applicable to the two countries’ exports to the United States.

“The current magnitude [of the difference] opens up an even greater opportunity to expand [Mexico’s] exports, production and employment in the manufacturing sector,” the ministry said.

Mexico vs. China, and the world

“Despite a more uncertain international environment due to changes in trade policy,” Mexico “maintains one of the most favorable positions in global trade and, in particular, with its main North American partners.”

So reads an inset in the SHCP’s 2026 budget proposal, including in the document under the title “Resilience of Mexico’s external sector in the face of a new trade environment.”

The Finance Ministry said that Mexico’s advantage is “explained by four factors”:

  • A lower tariff rate to access the U.S. market compared to competitors.
  • “Preferential access” to the U.S. market thanks to the USMCA. (Most Mexican goods that comply with the USMCA can enter the U.S. tariff-free).
  • The “deep integration” of Mexico’s exports in “regional value chains.” (Mexico and the U.S. are said to be part of a “co-production system”).
  • The “flexibility of the exchange rate regime, which allows orderly adjustments and preserves competitiveness.”

The SHCP said that the United States’ effective tariff rate for imports from Mexico was 4.7% in July. It described the rate as “one of the lowest” among the United States’ trade partners.

The ministry said that the United States’ “global average” tariff rate was 9.7%. For the European Union, it was a slightly lower 9.1%, while for China it was a much higher 40.4%, the SHCP said.

It highlighted that 81% of Mexico’s exports to the United States didn’t face tariffs in July, mainly thanks to the UMSCA, which superseded NAFTA in 2020 and is scheduled for review in 2026.

The SHCP also noted that the United States’ effective tariff rate on imports from Mexico has “only increased” 4.5 percentage points in 2025 compared to last year, whereas the U.S. hiked duties on Chinese goods by 29.5 percentage points, and 7.4 percentage points, on average, on products from countries around the world.

Mexico’s trade advantage over other countries “doesn’t depend on circumstances” that are subject to change (oftentimes due to the apparent whims of the U.S. president), but depends rather on an “institutional framework” — the USMCA — “that limits exposure to tariff increases,” the ministry said.

Mexico’s worsened yet still favorable trade situation with the U.S. — which Mexican officials, including President Claudia Shienbaum and Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard, have emphasized on innumerable occasions — should help the country to continue to attract foreign investment in the years ahead. Indeed, foreign direct investment in Mexico hit a record high in the first half of the year.

SHCP highlights importance of USMCA review 

The Finance Ministry said that the 2026 USMCA review “will be decisive to consolidate a more predictable framework for regional trade and to give greater certainty to companies, even in the event of adjustment to rules of access and origin.”

“Clarity in these criteria will be key to strengthening investment plans and expanding production chains with greater national content,” the SHCP said.

The Mexican government is determined to achieve even more favorable conditions for Mexico-based companies that export to the United States. As things stand, U.S. tariffs apply to a range of Mexican products, including vehicles, aluminum, steel and goods that don’t meet USMCA rules.

The government’s plan to impose higher tariffs on a broad range of goods from China and other countries with which Mexico doesn’t have trade agreements is widely seen as an attempt to appease the U.S. ahead of the USMCA review, while also protecting Mexican industry and spurring increased domestic production — key objectives of the Plan México economic initiative.

Sheinbaum is confident that the USMCA will endure beyond the 2026 review, and frequently asserts that the way in which North America can be most competitive globally is as a united trade bloc and production hub.

Trump — who has both questioned whether the USMCA is still needed and indicated that he wants to “renegotiate” the agreement rather than just review it — is the X factor in the upcoming review, a president who has reshaped global trade in 2025, and shown he is prepared to violate the existing North American trade framework to exert pressure on both Mexico and Canada.

spot_img

How to plant and grow lots of nutritious and tasty tomatoes in your garden

by Evangelyn Rodríguez

  • When planting tomatoes, bury two-thirds of the tomato stem to promote strong root growth, stability and drought resistance.
  • Enhance planting holes with crushed eggshells (for calcium), worm castings (for microbes), compost (for water retention) and used coffee grounds (for nitrogen).
  • Use a post-hole digger for deep, wide holes to prevent soil compaction and encourage root expansion.
  • Provide 1-1.5 inches of water weekly. Irrigate in the morning and supply mulch to retain moisture and prevent disease.
  • Shallow planting leads to weak roots and dehydration, while inconsistent watering causes blossom-end rot and cracked fruit.

For home gardeners across North America, the quest for the perfect tomato – plump, flavorful and abundant – begins long before the first fruit ripens. The difference between a lackluster harvest and a bumper crop often comes down to a single, critical moment: planting day.

According to horticultural experts and seasoned growers, how a tomato is planted – not just where or when – determines its resilience, growth rate and ultimate yield. Whether you choose to plant tomatoes in urban containers, suburban raised beds or rural garden plots, the methods outlined here can double or triple a plant’s productivity without the addition of synthetic fertilizers or costly inputs.

Brighteon.AI‘s Enoch engine explains that avoiding the use of synthetic chemicals ensures safer, more nutritious food while protecting the environment and fostering biodiversity. Organic methods like composting and companion planting strengthen soil health and local food systems, promoting sustainability and resilience.

The best way to plant and grow tomatoes

Tomato plants are heavy feeders, demanding lots of potassium, phosphorus and nitrogen, although they require more phosphorus and less nitrogen to produce flowers and fruit. Yet, the most common mistake gardeners make isn’t under-fertilizing – it’s under-preparing the planting hole. Tomatoes planted in shallow, unamended soil develop weak root systems, making them vulnerable to drought, disease and nutrient deficiencies.

According to experts, the first six inches of a tomato’s life dictate its entire season. A deep, nutrient-rich hole encourages roots to drive downward, accessing moisture and minerals that shallow roots can’t reach. Planting tomatoes in 18- to 24-inch-deep, compost-amended holes is the first step to ensuring an abundant yield.

Step 1: Dig deep

Dig a hole twice as wide as the root ball and deep enough to bury two-thirds of the stem. This ensures:

  • Root proliferation: Tomatoes uniquely grow roots along their stems when buried. This helps create the necessary deep root structure for improved water and nutrient absorption.
  • Temperature buffer: Deep roots insulate the plant from soil temperature swings, which can stunt growth.

Pro tip: Use a post-hole digger to minimize soil compaction and save your back. Avoid pressing down on the soil after planting; loose dirt encourages root expansion.

Step 2: What to bury with your tomato

The secret to explosive growth lies in four soil amendments, each targeting a specific need:

  • Pulverized eggshells – Tomatoes need calcium to prevent blossom-end rot, a disorder affecting up to 50 percent of homegrown tomatoes. Dry eggshells are 95 percent calcium carbonate, but their slow release (over 2-3 months) matches the plant’s uptake curve. Grind 3-4 eggshells per plant into a fine powder (a coffee grinder works). Mix into the holes base.
  • Worm castings – Castings contain beneficial microbes that outcompete pathogens like Fusarium and Verticillium wilt.  Add ½-¾ cup per hole.
  • Compost – Compost improves soil structure, holding 5x its weight in water. Mix 2-3 cups of compost per hole, with extra at the bottom to lure roots downward.
  • Used coffee grounds – Coffee grounds provide nitrogen and trace minerals, reducing transplant shock. Add 2-3 tablespoons per hole. Avoid using fresh grounds as their acidity can inhibit germination. Test your soil if you’re planning to apply more than once monthly.

Step 3: The burial technique

Bury two-thirds of the tomato stem, leaving only the top 4-6 inches above soil. The stem’s white hairs (trichomes) eventually become roots when buried, increasing plant water uptake. If planted too shallow, the root ball can dry out, causing corky stem rot.

Step 4: Watering wisdom

Inconsistent watering leads to blossom-end rot and cracked fruit. To avoid this, ensure your plant receives:

  • Deep watering– Provide 1-1.5 inches per week (a rain gauge helps track)
  • Morning irrigation – Reduces foliar diseases like early blight
  • Mulch – Apply 2-3 inches of straw to retain moisture and block soil-borne spores

The difference between a mediocre tomato harvest and a record-breaking one isn’t luck – it’s what happens in the first hour of planting. By digging deep, amending smartly and burying stems properly, gardeners can hardwire their tomato plants for success, reducing labor and inputs all season.

spot_img