Sunday, August 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 178

Mayans and Chinese were able to have a cultural exchange before the Spanish arrived?

Some theories suggest that the Chinese were able to set foot on American territory before the Spanish. We tell you about them

 

Shared/by México Desconocido

 

Currently there are several theories that question whether Europeans were the first civilization to encounter the peoples of America. One of them is the one that suggests a probable meeting between Chinese and Mayans. According to Hu Chundong, a professor at Peking University, there are some similarities between the Chinese and Mayan languages. Based on his comparison of the two languages, at least 22 words bear a resemblance, especially if the analysis focuses on the South Asian country’s dialect.

Fusang: the meeting between Mayans and Chinese?

Another of the tests proposed by Chundong is the resemblance of the Mayan art found in Campeche, Mexico, and the crafts of the Tang Dynasty. This same theory holds that a group of scholars in the Tang Dynasty wrote about a group of sailors who traveled to a distant country called Fusang. It was the Buddhist monk Hui Shen who first described Fusang in the year 499. According to his description, the place was 20,000 li from China, which is currently 8,316 kilometers.

According to the orientalist Joseph de Guignes, the place corresponds to the American coast and not to Japan or Afghanistan as others maintain. Hui Shen held that Fusang was a place with many edible, red, pear-like, oval fruits. He had wealth of gold and silver. Their society was organized and they wrote on paper made from vegetable bark. They wore loincloths and hunted deer.

Some speculate that this place could be between Mexico and Guatemala. As for the materials to make handicrafts, both civilizations favored the use of jade, to which they attributed healing powers and implemented its use in funeral rites.

Regarding religious thought, both cultures deified feathered serpents such as Kukulkan or the Chinese dragon Loong. In addition to considering the world in divine dualities.

However, there is a discrepancy in the theory of Joseph de Guignes, since Fusang would have converted to Buddhism according to Hui Shen, in addition to practicing cremation and owning animals such as horses, which did not arrive in America until after the conquest. The latter reinforces the idea that Fusang was in Afghanistan.

The Asians arrived before the Spanish

On the other hand, in 2002 the retired agent Gavin Menzies wrote the best seller 1421, the year in which China discovered the world, where he maintains that the Chinese admiral Zheng He arrived in America in 1421, that is, 71 years before the Spanish Christopher Columbus. If this thesis is true, the Chinese would have arrived in America earlier, but they would not have had the ability to inherit any relevant influence.

Finally, the most well-founded hypothesis is the one that refers to DNA studies, which concludes that during the ice age, different migratory currents from Asia settled in America, founding the original peoples, including the Mayans.

spot_img

Roman ‘Chocolatito’ Gonzalez vs Julio Cesar Martínez

by the El Reportero‘s news services

Roman González and Julio Cesar Martínez collide this weekend in a potential fight of the year contender.

‘Chocolatito’ was due to face Juan Francisco Estrada to complete their epic trilogy, but Estrada was forced out due to Covid-19.

Martinez swooped in to set up this mouth-watering clash, which pits the current WBC flyweight champion against the four-weight colossus from Nicaragua.

Gonzalez is a stunning 50-3 during his pro career and is fighting for the first time since his split-decision defeat to Edrada in March last year.

He will face a tough night against Martinez, who retained his WBC strap after his contest against McWilliams Arroyo was stopped due to an accidental head clash.

When is Chocolatito vs Martinez?

– The pair are fighting at super-flyweight as Martinez steps up.

– This weekend’s big fight will be held on Saturday, March 5.

– The Pechanga Arena in San Diego plays host.

– Things get underway at 8.30pm ET, with the main event expected around 11.30pm ET.

Which TV channel and live stream can I watch it on?

The fight will be broadcast worldwide on DAZN.

What they said

Chocolatito: “I understand and comprehend that sooner or later, I will have to say goodbye.

“That’s what truly motivates me, to get to that moment.

“I have some goals to complete in my career and then we’ll say no more.”

Martinez: “It was big news to have this big fight against an idol in Chocolatito Gonzalez.

“And I’m happy because I know that we are made for these kinds of challenges.

“So we are more than ready.”

spot_img

Remittances kick off the year with a 20 percent increase

But they were under US $4 billion for the first time in 8 months

 by the El Reportero‘s wire services

Remittance payments topped a landmark US $50 billion in 2021 and continued that strong performance in January.

The Bank of México reported that payments totaled US $3.93 billion in the first 31 days of 2022, a 19.6 percent increase on the figure for January 2021.

There were 10,589 remittances sent in January with an average value of $371. That was 10.4 percent more payments than in January last year and the average payment was 8.3 percent higher.

However, the total received for the first month of 2022 was still a fall on the previous month: 17.2 percent less than in December, when $4.75 billion was received. January also ended a run of eight consecutive months with payments over $4 billion.

It was a record breaking year in 2021 for remittances, which were $10 billion higher than in 2020.

The money is typically sent home by Mexican nationals living in the United States, but some experts speculate that an unknown percentage of remittances are part of money laundering schemes by criminals in Mexico.

President López Obrador has thanked the 38 million Mexicans in the United States for their contribution to the Mexican economy on various occasions. He has described those migrants as heroes and estimated that their payments benefit around 10 million families.

Remittances are Mexico’s second largest source of foreign currency after automotive exports.

Mexico News Daily

In other Mexico’s news:

19 million Mexicans on minimum wage in January, up 39 percent since December

Businesses have not fully recovered from pandemic, says expert

The number of Mexicans earning the minimum wage has increased 39 percent in the space of a single month to 19 million, official data shows.

Data from the national statistics agency INEGI shows that 5.3 million additional people were earning the minimum wage in January compared to December 2021.

The minimum wage increased 22 percent in January to 173 pesos (US $8.40) per day, or 5,186 pesos (just over US $250) per month, in most of the country. The minimum in the northern border region is 50 percent higher at 260 pesos per day.

Since records began, there has never been such a high number of minimum wage earners, and for the first time ever they are the largest cohort of workers.

INEGI data also shows that the number of people earning more than the minimum wage but no more than double that amount decreased by 11 percent, or 2.3 million workers, to just under 18 million between December and January.

Only 2.3 million people earn between three and five minimum wages, down from 3.5 million in December, while just 800,000 earn more than five times the minimum, or over 865 pesos per day or 25,950 (US $1,260) per month. A month earlier in December that figure was 1.3 million.

Héctor Magaña, head of the economy and business research center at the Tec de Monterrey university, told the newspaper El Universal that wages have generally decreased because businesses have not fully recovered from the pandemic-induced economic downturn.

“They tend to offer positions with lower remuneration than … in previous periods,” he said.

spot_img

Putin launched the first war in history; there was never a war before

by Jon Rappoport

And THAT’S why the US media and the government are so shocked and outraged.

The history of the world up until now has been one of peace.

Right?

I do seem to recall, though—so long ago it’s quite dim in memory—the US conducted war in Iraq more than once, and Afghanistan as well. And there was no outrage in the US press then.

And wasn’t there a US war in a place called Vietnam, or am I mistaken?

American journalists are now on wartime alert, fanning every flame of anti-Russian sentiment they can find.

And real red-blooded patriots should shout down and blot out anyone who dissents from absolute hatred of Russia.

Forget the fact that, for many years, the US government has been moving nuclear missiles closer to Russia. If more of those missiles were set up in the Ukraine, it would constitute an even greater threat.

Forget those moves, because they weren’t war. They were FOREIGN POLICY, which is quite different.

Americans aren’t supposed to think about that strange animal called foreign policy. It’s a subject every loyal patriot should make sure he never understands. It’s part of the patriot code.

For example, here is a secret piece of foreign policy carried out by a beloved President who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. You might remember him. Barack Obama. As you read the following details, make sure you don’t think they constituted WAR. There was absolutely no reason for the American press to report on them, or to stir up anti-war sentiment in the public.

The Guardian, January 9, 2017, “America dropped 26,171 bombs in 2016. What a bloody end to Obama’s reign,” by Medea Benjamin:

“…in 2016 alone, the Obama administration dropped at least 26,171 bombs. This means that every day last year, the US military blasted combatants or civilians overseas with 72 bombs; that’s three bombs every hour, 24 hours a day.”

“While most of these air attacks were in Syria and Iraq, US bombs also rained down on people in Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan. That’s seven majority-Muslim countries.”

“One bombing technique that President Obama championed is drone strikes. As drone-warrior-in-chief, he spread the use of drones outside the declared battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, mainly to Pakistan and Yemen. Obama authorized over 10 times more drone strikes than George W Bush, and automatically painted all males of military age in these regions as combatants, making them fair game for remote controlled killing.”

“President Obama has claimed that his overseas military adventures are legal under the 2001 and 2003 authorizations for the use of military force passed by Congress to go after al-Qaida. But today’s wars have little or nothing to do with those who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001.”

“Given that drones account for only a small portion of the munitions dropped in the past eight years, the numbers of civilians killed by Obama’s bombs could be in the thousands. But we can’t know for sure as the administration, and the mainstream media, has been virtually silent about the civilian toll of the administration’s failed interventions.”

“In May 2013, I interrupted President Obama during his foreign policy address at the National Defense University. I had just returned from visiting the families of innocent people killed by US drone attacks in Yemen and Pakistan, including the Rehman children who saw their grandmother blown to bits while in the field picking okra.”

“Speaking out on behalf of grieving families whose losses have never been acknowledged by the US government, I asked President Obama to apologize to them. As I was being dragged out, President Obama said: ‘The voice of that woman is worth paying attention to’.”

“Too bad he never did.”

Again, that was foreign policy, not war.

Shh. Don’t tell the children.

Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed, Exit From The Matrix, and Power Outside The Matrix.

spot_img

6 Health benefits of beans, a versatile superfood and source of protein

by Joanne Washburn

 

11/24/2021 – Beans may be infamous for causing (intestinal) gas, but they offer many benefits that make them worth incorporating into your diet. If you’re looking to pack in more nutrients or considering following a plant-based diet, eating different types of beans may be all that you need. Here’s everything you need to know about them:

  1. Beans are a great source of protein

Beans are some of the best plant-based sources of protein, providing about 15 grams per cup. Some great beans to eat for protein include lima beans, kidney beans and black beans.

It’s important that you consume protein every day because it’s what gives structure to your hair, nails, skin, muscles, tendons, ligaments and organs. And at times when your body doesn’t get enough energy from carbohydrates or fats, protein can serve as fuel for your cells.

Beans also make a great substitute for meat if you’re trying to eat more plant-based foods and less animal products.

  1. Beans are high in folate

Beans are also rich in folate (vitamin B9). Folate helps your body make healthy red blood cells, which transport oxygen from your lungs to other tissues. Folate is also crucial during early pregnancy, as it helps lower the risk of birth defects. Folate helps your body convert carbohydrates into glucose, which cells use for energy.

Black-eyed peas contain the most folate of any bean, with a half-cup serving providing around 100 micrograms of the nutrient.

  1. Beans fill you up

Beans are some of the most weight-loss-friendly foods you can eat. They are low in fat and calories but high in protein and fiber. Protein and fiber are two of the most significant nutrients for weight loss because they promote feelings of fullness for long periods. You’re less likely to snack between meals if you feel full.

  1. Beans are good for your heart

Beans contain many nutrients that help keep your heart healthy, such as folate, magnesium and fiber. Aside from helping your body make healthy red blood cells, folate also helps lower levels of an amino acid in the blood called homocysteine. At very high levels, homocysteine can increase your risk of heart disease and stroke.

Magnesium, on the other hand, is important for maintaining a healthy heart rhythm. It is involved in transporting potassium, calcium and other electrolytes into cells. Electrolytes are electrically charged minerals that help regulate heartbeat.

Lastly, the fiber in beans, particularly soluble fiber, can reduce the absorption of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) into your bloodstream. LDL is also known as “bad” cholesterol because it can accumulate along the walls of your arteries. If left unchecked, bad cholesterol can cause your arteries to harden and narrow, raising your blood pressure.

  1. Beans regulate blood sugar

Beans can help keep your blood sugar under control thanks to soluble fiber. This type of fiber can help slow the absorption of sugar into your bloodstream.

Beans also have a low glycemic index (GI), meaning they won’t cause a spike in your blood sugar after eating. As such, beans make a great addition to the diets of people with high blood sugar.

  1. Beans are packed with antioxidants

When you think of foods with antioxidants, you probably think of green leafy vegetables or colorful berries. But one of the best things about pinto beans, kidney beans and other legumes is the large amount of vitamins they contain, such as vitamins C, B1, E and K. These vitamins work as antioxidants, protecting healthy cells from inflammation and damage.

Inflammation and cellular damage are at the root of chronic diseases, including cancer. As such, eating antioxidant-rich foods like beans as part of a balanced diet may help keep chronic diseases at bay.

spot_img

Roman ‘Chocolatito’ Gonzalez vs Julio Cesar Martínez

by the El Reportero‘s news services

 

Román González and Julio César Martínez collide this weekend in a potential fight of the year contender.

‘Chocolatito’ was due to face Juan Francisco Estrada to complete their epic trilogy, but Estrada was forced out due to Covid-19.

Martinez swooped in to set up this mouth-watering clash, which pits the current WBC flyweight champion against the four-weight colossus from Nicaragua.

Gonzalez is a stunning 50-3 during his pro career and is fighting for the first time since his split-decision defeat to Edrada in March last year.

He will face a tough night against Martínez, who retained his WBC strap after his contest against McWilliams Arroyo was stopped due to an accidental head clash.

When is Chocolatito vs Martinez?

– The pair are fighting at super-flyweight as Martinez steps up.

– This weekend’s big fight will be held on Saturday, March 5.

– The Pechanga Arena in San Diego plays host.

– Things get underway at 8.30 p.m. ET, with the main event expected around 11.30pm ET.

Which TV channel and live stream can I watch it on?

The fight will be broadcast worldwide on DAZN.

What they said

Chocolatito: “I understand and comprehend that sooner or later, I will have to say goodbye.

“That’s what truly motivates me, to get to that moment.

“I have some goals to complete in my career and then we’ll say no more.”

Martínez: “It was big news to have this big fight against an idol in Chocolatito González.

“And I’m happy because I know that we are made for these kinds of challenges.

“So we are more than ready.”

 

spot_img

Attorney General Bonta Announces Nationwide Investigation into TikTok

Attorneys general concerned for safety and well-being of children 

 

Submitted by the California DOJ

 

OAKLAND – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced a nationwide investigation into TikTok for promoting its social media platform to children and young adults while its use is associated with physical and mental health harms to youth. Attorneys general nationwide are examining whether the company is violating state consumer protection laws and putting children at risk.

“Our children are growing up in the age of social media – and many feel like they need to measure up to the filtered versions of reality that they see on their screens,” said Attorney General Bonta. “We know this takes a devastating toll on children’s mental health and well-being. But we don’t know what social media companies knew about these harms and when. Our nationwide investigation will allow us to get much-needed answers and determine if TikTok is violating the law in promoting its platform to young Californians.”

The investigation will look into the harms using TikTok can cause to young users and what TikTok knew about those harms. The investigation focuses, among other things, on the techniques utilized by TikTok to boost young user engagement, including strategies or efforts to increase the duration of time spent on the platform and frequency of engagement with the platform.

Attorney General Bonta is committed to holding social media companies accountable, particularly when their actions may cause harm to California’s youngest residents. In November, Attorney General Bonta announced a nationwide investigation into Meta for providing and promoting its social media platform — Instagram — to children and young adults despite knowing that such use is associated with physical and mental health harms. Attorney General Bonta also co-led a bipartisan coalition in expressing support for hearings in the U.S. Senate on “Protecting Kids Online: Facebook, Instagram, and Mental Health Harms.” Earlier that year, Attorney General Bonta joined 43 attorneys general in urging Meta to abandon plans to launch a version of Instagram for children under the age of 13. Following heavy criticism and shocking new reports from Wall Street Journal and other publications, Meta announced in September that it would pause development of the new platform.

Leading the investigation is a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general from California, Florida, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Jersey, Tennessee, and Vermont. They are joined by a broad group of attorneys general from across the country.

 

spot_img

Democrats’ abortion bill goes down in flames after Manchin breaks with party in close vote

by CF Chief Editor

 

Nearly every Senate Democrat voted in favor of legislation Monday which would have radically expanded abortion rights beyond even the Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade.

The Women’s Health Protection Act would have forced every state to allow abortions for any reason until at least the point of viability, generally defined at around six months into a pregnancy, and banned most restrictions on abortion up to the point of birth.

Every Republican voted against the bill, and every Democrat except Sen. Joe Manchin voted in favor, NBC News reported.

The WHPA would have invalidated all state and local laws restricting what types of abortion procedures are permissible while banning requirements that doctors give women medical tests such as ultrasounds before administering abortions, unless such requirements also applied to “medically comparable procedures.”

The bill proposed various deregulatory measures that would have loosened safety requirements nationwide for abortion providers, such as ending restrictions on doctors prescribing pills via “telemedicine” for do-it-yourself chemical abortions at home.

Abortion is a procedure used “primarily by women,” the bill explained before justifying the use of the word “woman,’ and noting that “transgender men” and “non-binary individuals” need abortion rights too.

“Women’s decisions over women’s health care belong to women, not to extremist right-wing legislatures,” commented Sen. Chuck Schumer, who called abortion a “fundamental right.”

Jeane Mancini, the president of the March for Life, said it was the most radical abortion legislation in American history. “This bill is obviously designed by pro-abortion politicians to appease the abortion lobby. Lawmakers, regardless of party affiliation, must reject it,” she commented.

The bill is an apparent attempt to codify the Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade, which is being reconsidered by the Court and could potentially be overturned in June.

spot_img

Turkey to block Russian warships in Black Sea

Shared/by Naveen Athrappully
Epoch Times
February 28, 2022 – Turkey will restrict the transit of Russian warships through the Black Sea, according to Ankara’s foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu, who also affirmed that Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine comes under the “war” category.

“Is this a conflict or a war? We decided on that. Article 19 of the Montreux Convention is very clear. This is a war,” Cavusoglu said in an interview with CNN. The 1936 Montreux Convention allows Ankara to limit naval transit via the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits that connect the Marmara, Aegean, and the Black Sea.

Ships can pass through the straits after giving Turkey a diplomatic notification subject to certain restrictions on the weight of the ships, the arms they can carry, and whether the ships come from a Black Sea country such as Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Georgia, and Bulgaria.

However, during times of war warships are only allowed to pass through if they are not from nations classified to be belligerent. If Turkey is part of the war or feels that it is threatened, it can block the transit of all warships whether they come from a Black Sea nation or not. But the country does not have the right to block civilian vessels, even under adverse conditions.

“Now this conflict has turned into a war, in this case, this is how we apply Montreux for the parties, Russia or Ukraine. Article 19 provides an exception,” Cavusoglu said. “If the ship of the war country will return to its port, an exception is made. We will implement all the provisions of Montreux with transparency.”

This will allow Russian warships to get back to their bases. The minister warned against nations abusing this exemption.

Ukraine had earlier appealed to Turkey to block Russian ships from entering the Black Sea as Moscow launched an invasion of Ukraine’s southern coast from the region. Six warships and a submarine from Russia have passed through Turkey’s straits for the month as of Feb. 27.

Turkey has good relations with both Russia and Ukraine. Ankara has been cautious against acting strongly against Moscow as the country is dependent on Russia for energy imports as well as tourism and trade. Turkey has, however, called for an end to the war.

“On the fourth day of the Ukraine war, we repeat President [Recep Tayyip] Erdogan’s call for an immediate halt of Russian attacks and the start of ceasefire negotiations,” Ibrahim Kalin, a spokesperson for the Turkish president, said in a Feb. 27 Twitter post. “We will continue our efforts to help the people of Ukraine and end bloodshed in this unjust and unlawful war.”

spot_img

Grocery Workers Union to Escalate Contract Fight With Actions at Safeway Stores

submitted by UFCW 5

 

Union President Says Members Prepared for a Strike

Bay Area grocery store workers will step up their campaign to win a new contract with Safeway Stores next week with actions at two of the company’s largest stores.

 

When: Monday, February 28 from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM

Where: 1701 Santa Rita Road, Pleasanton and 525 El Camino Real, Menlo Park

 

After months of little progress at the bargaining table, United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 5 is teaming up with local unions in Colorado, Washington State and throughout California to pressure Safeway and other grocery employers to reward pandemic-weary workers with contracts that reflect the sacrifices that they continue to make and the risks they continue to take.

While Safeway continues to enjoy expanded profits resulting from the ongoing pandemic, the company has thus far been unwilling to seriously address legitimate issues raised by members, and as a result, strike preparations are underway, says Local 5 President John Nunes.

“Safeway workers deserve and expect to be rewarded for their ongoing hard work at significant risk to themselves and their families posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Their hazard pay was hard-won but short-lived. It is well past time that the company deliver some justice and share their bloated profits with the workers that have struggled to create them,” said Nunes.

Workers are demanding better wages, more full-time opportunities, health care improvements, and stronger enforcement of workplace health and safety standards.

“I don’t understand why it has to be such a battle every three years,” says Safeway worker Samantha Webster. “I don’t understand the mindset of these companies and how they can appear to not properly value the employees who are the key to their success and the drivers of their profits, particularly in light of what we have been through for the past two years.”

The union will expand its store site actions to additional Safeway locations in the coming weeks as well as to Lucky and Save Mart stores where negotiations also remain unresolved.

spot_img