Sunday, June 8, 2025
Home Blog

Pacquiao to pause training for Hall of Fame induction

By the El Reportero staff

The 2025 Boxing Hall of Fame weekend in Canastota will have a unique highlight as Filipino legend Manny Pacquiao—still an active boxer—joins the ranks of inductees. Preparing for his July 19 bout against WBC welterweight champion Mario Barrios, Pacquiao will briefly pause training to attend the ceremony and leave his handprints as a symbol of his legacy.

Though he retired after his 2021 loss to Yordenis Ugás, the three-year eligibility window has now opened the doors for his Hall of Fame induction. At 46, Pacquiao remains the only fighter to win world titles in eight weight divisions. His career continues to defy norms, even as he’s honored among boxing’s greats.

Pacquiao will share the stage with fellow inductees Vinny Paz and Michael Nunn. On the women’s side, honorees include Yessica Chávez, Anne Sophie Mathis, Mary Jo Sanders, and Cathy Davis. Other recognitions go to figures outside the ring: referee Kenny Bayless, cutman Al Gavin, referee Harry Gibbs, journalist Randy Gordon, and TV producer Ross Greenburg. Rodrigo Valdez and Owen Swift will be honored posthumously.

This weekend marks a celebration of both legacy and ongoing ambition. Seeing Pacquiao, Paz, and Nunn together symbolizes different eras of greatness. As Canastota becomes, once again, boxing’s center stage, fans look ahead: Can Pacquiao triumph in his return, or will history repeat itself, as it did for Sugar Ray Leonard, who lost to Héctor Camacho after his own post-induction comeback?

So far, Pacquiao appears to be in peak form. His speed, conditioning, and drive seem undiminished. July 19 will test that readiness. But this weekend belongs to recognition, celebration, and reflection—on a career filled with unforgettable nights, global triumphs, and a fighter who united nations through the power of his fists.

Pacquiao’s story isn’t finished just yet. His presence in Canastota is more than symbolic—it’s a reminder that greatness doesn’t always end with retirement. Fans around the world will watch closely as a living legend takes his place in history, while still daring to chase one more victory in the ring.

 

spot_img

Harp Concert at SJMA

by Magdy Zara

The Silicon Valley Youth Harp Ensemble offers a beautiful evening concert of harp music, which will be the perfect complement to your visit to the museum.

The harp is recognized for its elegant combination of form and function. Harps date back to ancient Egypt and produce expressive, soothing, and peaceful sounds.

The San Jose Museum of Art supports the Silicon Valley Youth Harp Ensemble Success Program (also known as YES), which aims to provide a friendly, musically fun social environment that encourages students to learn and share. Playing in an ensemble inspires students to continue their commitment to music. The YES Program is designed to offer sequential and practical objectives for students to develop performance skills and musical appreciation. The concert will take place this Saturday, June 7, starting at 2 p.m. at the SJMA, located at 110 South Market Street in San José. Admission is free with museum admission.

Wepa Fest Celebrates Puerto Rican Culture

San José comes together to celebrate Puerto Rican culture and heritage with Wepa Fest 2005, a show organized jointly by the Latin American Art and Culture Movement and San José Jazz.

For the second consecutive year, Wepa Fest is a free, family-friendly celebration that brings together Puerto Rican and Caribbean citizens to celebrate the music, culture, and food of this country.

Last year, it featured three renowned salsa bands: Latin Rhythm Boys, Orquesta Taino, and La Mixta Criolla.

This free event will offer top-notch musical performances based on Puerto Rican culture, including salsa, bomba, and plena, complemented by hands-on art activities for families, and Caribbean food and drinks. This will be a free, family-friendly event, taking place on June 13th, starting at 4 p.m., in Pobladores Park, located in front of MACLA, 510 S 1st St, San José.

RhythmALlogy: A New Children’s Program

The RhythmALlogy children’s program is an event created and directed by percussionist Aaron Kierbel. RhythmALlogy is an innovative interactive program for children that combines movement, body percussion, and group percussion.

Each of these sessions is specially designed to cultivate and unleash the rhythmic potential of children under 10 years old, who will experience irrepressible bursts of dancing, laughter, a unique sense of connection with others, and a temporary relief from self-criticism.

ALlogy draws on his talent to encourage children to explore and share their rhythmic spirit.

This children’s program has two performances on Friday, June 13th, one from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. and another at 12 p.m.

The event will be held at the Yerba Buena Gardens Children’s Garden, located at 799 Howard St, San Francisco.

La Moderna Tradición Orchestra in Concert

If you’re looking to enjoy classical Cuban music and dance salsa and timba, don’t miss the La Moderna Tradición Orchestra concert, which exudes the sweet and powerful sound of the Afro-Cuban charanga.

This concert features violins and wind instruments with Afro-Cuban rhythms. It will also feature Tregar Otton, Eduardo Herrera, Michael Spiro, Maru Pérez-Viana, Jason Moen, Pablo Caro, Ayla Dávila, Carlitos Medrano, John Calloway, and Sandy Poindexter.

The event is on June 18th at Yoshis located at 510 Embarcadero West in Oakland.

spot_img

Mexico’s Museum of Anthropology wins prestigious Princess of Asturias Award for Concord

by the El Reportero‘s news services

La Piedra del Sol Mexica es un artefacto icónico que es imperdible ver en el museo principal de la Ciudad de México.

The National Museum of Anthropology (MNA) in Mexico City has won the 2025 Princess of Asturias Award for Concord, as the foundation recognized on Wednesday the museum’s contribution to preserving Mexico’s anthropological heritage.

The Princess of Asturias Foundation, a prestigious Spanish non-profit private institution that promotes scientific, cultural and humanistic values, lauded the MNA as “heir to a long-standing tradition of defending and preserving an essential part of humanity’s anthropological heritage (that) simultaneously expresses the hallmarks of a great nation, signs of identity to which its people genuinely relate.”

The MNA opened in Chapultepec Park in 1964 with a design by Pedro Ramírez that was immediately viewed as a valuable example of modernity and the avant-garde. Its mission to research, conserve, exhibit and disseminate Mexico’s most important archaeological and ethnographic collections has made it one of the most important museums in Latin America and the most popular in Mexico City, attracting 3.7 million visitors in 2024.

The Concord Award, announced on Wednesday, is “aimed at recognizing the work of defending and advancing human rights, as well as of promoting and protecting peace, freedom, solidarity, world heritage and, in general, the progress of humanity.”

The foundation has seven other categories of awards: the Arts, Literature, Social Sciences, Communication and Humanities, Technical and Scientific Research, International Cooperation and Sports.

Winners of the Concord Award receive a prize fund of €50,000 (1 million pesos/US $56,900) and a sculpture created by the Catalan artist Joan Miró (1893-1983).

The MNA recently invested 45 million pesos (US $2.2 million) in the construction of five new rooms housing almost 6,000 archaeological, ethnographic and artisanal pieces from the pre-conquest section to an area showcasing Mexico’s contemporary cultural traditions, which opened in January.

Previous MNA distinctions include the Government of the Federal District’s 1808 Medal and the United Mexico Foundation 2010 “For the Excellence of What is Ours” Award.

The award comes a day after the museum had to close early on Tuesday, citing a shortage of security personnel.

Other National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) institutions, such as the Templo Mayor Museum, the Museo del Carmen and the Museum of Interventions, were also closed to the public.

The closure followed a Sunday announcement that the INAH changed its security from the Mexico City Auxiliary Police to a private company.

With reports from Expansión and El Universal

spot_img

California bill could raise car dealer fee cap to $500

by the El Reportero staff

California lawmakers are considering a bill that would significantly increase the amount car dealers can charge to process vehicle sales documents.

Currently capped at $85, the fee could jump to $500 under Senate Bill 791, which is set for a vote in the full state Senate. The bill, authored by Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose), would allow dealers to charge up to 1 percent of a vehicle’s purchase price, with a $500 maximum.

Supporters, including the California New Car Dealers Association, argue that dealers deserve compensation for the administrative burden of processing sales. However, consumer advocates say the bill would hurt buyers.

Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, called it a “huge giveaway” to large corporations like Tesla and CarMax. “Some dealers, like Carvana, don’t charge these fees at all,” she said.

Shahan noted that California currently has one of the most consumer-friendly caps in the nation. If the bill passes, it would reverse that trend and make buying a car more expensive for residents.

Cortese did not respond to a request for comment by deadline, though he has previously stated the bill aims to cover actual dealer costs.

Scam warnings issued for Medicare Fraud Prevention Week

Medicare loses $60 billion to $80 billion a year to fraud and this year, for Medicare Fraud Prevention Week, your local Senior Medicare Patrol has good advice on how to spot a con.

During Medicare Fraud Prevention Week, experts are warning seniors to stay alert for scams that cost the program up to $80 billion each year.

Karen Joy Fletcher with California Health Advocates said many scams begin with fake calls claiming to verify Medicare numbers. “They want to steal your information to bill for services you’ll never get,” she said.

Fletcher also warned of fraud involving unsolicited medical equipment or people offering free services in parking lots. These are often schemes to bill Medicare fraudulently.

One particularly harmful scam involves enrolling people into hospice care without consent. Once in hospice, Medicare may limit access to needed surgeries or treatments. MyMedicare.gov.

To guard against fraud, Fletcher urged people to regularly check their Medicare statements at MyMedicare.gov. “It’s the best way to catch suspicious charges early,” she said.

Caregivers should also monitor for unexpected deliveries or medical claims. If something doesn’t look right, contact the local Senior Medicare Patrol for help.

“Awareness is the best defense,” Fletcher said. “These scams are preventable if we stay

 

 

spot_img

Biden admin knew COVID shot risks in early 2021 but kept silent for months: Senate report

The Biden administration was warned of cardiovascular dangers associated with the COVID vaccines in February 2021 yet kept in quiet until June, according to a Senate report

by Calvin Freiburger

The Biden administration was aware of cardiovascular dangers associated with the COVID-19 vaccines as early as its second month in office yet delayed disclosing them for months, according to a report by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

The Daily Wire obtained a copy of the report, which uncovered a February 2021 email from Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group (VaST) co-lead Lauri Markowitz that reported of the almost 1,000 post-vaccination deaths reported at the time, those with “known” causes were “often cardiovascular.”

The report further noted that Israel, which began vaccinating earlier than the United States, notified CDC officials that it found “large reports of myocarditis, particularly in young people, following the administration of the Pfizer vaccine.”

However, “(r)ather than provide the public and health care providers with immediate and transparent information regarding the risk of myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, the Biden administration waited until late June 2021 to announce changes to the labels for the Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines based on the ‘suggested increased risks’ of myocarditis and pericarditis,” the report found. “Even though CDC and FDA officials were well aware of the risk of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, the Biden administration opted to withhold issuing a formal warning to the public for months about the safety concerns, jeopardizing the health of young Americans.”

“For a number of months, they were talking about these things. At some point in time, they actually internally said, ‘Is there a signal of myocarditis, a safety signal?’ And the answer was ‘Yes,’” said Republican Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, chair of the committee. “And yet, a couple of days later, they decided not to issue a warning on the Health Alert Network (HAN). Rather than provide informed consent, the federal health agencies, the Biden administration, covered it up. They downplayed the signals.”

Johnson added that the Biden administration stonewalled his committee, but the Trump administration is “beginning to produce records, pursuant to the chairman’s subpoena, that should have been provided years ago, without redactions, to Congress and the public.”

The federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports 38,615 deaths, 220,701 hospitalizations, 22,531 heart attacks, and 29,150 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of April 25, among other ailments. CDC researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.

An analysis of 99 million people across eight countries published in the journal Vaccine “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of mRNA-based COVID vaccines, as well as signs of increased risk of “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” and other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.” In April 2024, the CDC was forced to release by court order 780,000 previously undisclosed reports of serious adverse reactions, and a study out of Japan found “statistically significant increases” in cancer deaths after third doses of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, and offered several theories for a causal link.

In January, a long-awaited Florida grand jury report on the COVID vaccine manufacturers found that while only a miniscule percentage of the millions of vaccinations resulted in serious harm based on the data it had access to, such events do occur, and there are “profound and serious issues” in pharmaceutical companies’ review process, including reluctance to share what evidence of adverse events they did find.

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Last week, U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and vaccine chief Dr. Vinay Prasad co-authored a paper announcing new safety trials before future COVID-19 shot recommendations, but also that they anticipated continuing to recommend the shots for everyone older than 65 and for most children and adults with a wide range of “risk factors.”

This week, however, Health & Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that they were withdrawing recommendations for healthy children or healthy pregnant women to receive the shot. LifeSite.

 

 

spot_img

Headline: Sudden ICE arrests at courthouses tear families apart without due process

by Marvin Ramírez

Imagine a father stepping into court, not to flee from justice but to comply with it — to check in, to follow protocol, to resolve his case. Then, without warning, he disappears into detention, hundreds of miles away, leaving behind his children, his job, his American-citizen wife, and an entire life built over decades. That is exactly what is happening right now in our communities.

The recent case of Miguel Angel Lopez Luvian — a 47-year-old father of three from Livermore who has lived in the United States for 27 years — is a harrowing example. On May 27, Miguel walked into a routine immigration appointment in San Francisco, as he had done many times before. He was not evading the law. He had an active legal case, was complying with the process, and was the sole breadwinner for his family. Moments later, he was detained by ICE and swiftly relocated to a facility 250 miles away, in McFarland, California.

His wife Rosa, an American citizen, said she received a stunned phone call from him, urging her to contact his lawyer — then his phone went dead. Like countless others in his position, Miguel was complying with the system and actively pursuing legal resolution. Yet he was treated as if he were hiding or absconding from the law. His arrest feels more like an ambush than a lawful detainment.

Even more disturbing, the same day saw ICE agents conducting other “unusual” arrests in San Francisco, including detaining people just outside — or even inside — federal courtrooms. Attorneys and reporters described plainclothed agents who refused to identify themselves, taking individuals into custody without stating a reason. This is deeply troubling. Historically, immigration court has been a place where ICE exercises restraint, especially when individuals have pending legal matters. It’s supposed to be a zone where due process takes precedence. That norm now appears to be collapsing.

The consequences are devastating. These expedited detentions are inhumane not only because of how they’re executed, but because they disregard the complex human lives entangled in each case. People like Miguel are not criminals hiding in the shadows. They are parents, taxpayers, community members. They are spouses of U.S. citizens, caretakers of children, workers supporting local economies.

In Miguel’s case, he has paid taxes, supported his family, and lived peacefully in the Bay Area for nearly three decades. He and Rosa have been married since 2001 and known each other since they were teenagers. Despite their efforts to regularize his status, including appeals to higher courts, Miguel was detained with no warning — while his case is still active.

Is this what justice looks like?

Detaining people during pending court processes strips them not only of their legal rights but their humanity. It punishes people who are complying, discourages others from showing up, and threatens the very notion of due process. Moreover, these detentions fracture families overnight. Children are left without a parent, spouses without support, and families without income — all in the blink of an eye.

If the justification is the reimplementation of a so-called “rule of law,” as Homeland Security officials claim, then why is the law applied so unevenly and arbitrarily? Why are people who are complying being detained without resolution of their legal cases? Why are detentions occurring before the facts are fully reviewed?

This is not the return of lawful order — it’s the abandonment of fairness.

We must remember that justice is not about punishment for punishment’s sake. It is about process, rights, and respect for human dignity. A government that strips people of those principles while they are actively engaging with the system is a government acting in bad faith.

Furthermore, these actions inflict long-lasting trauma on children and spouses — many of whom are citizens — and deepen fear in immigrant communities. When breadwinners are taken without warning, entire families spiral into crisis. Community trust is shattered, legal processes are undermined, and America’s promise of fairness becomes hollow.

Protests are already forming, such as the June 4 rally in Livermorium Plaza demanding Miguel’s release. But rallies should not be the only way to stop the injustice. Elected officials, community leaders, and all Americans of conscience must demand a return to principled immigration enforcement — one that recognizes due process and the sanctity of the family.

Until then, we must ask: how many more families must be torn apart before fairness prevails?

With reports from KTVU, NBC Bay Area, and KPIX.

 

spot_img

US embassy debunks viral ‘narco-politician’ list

by the El Reportero’s wire services

The United States Embassy in Mexico denounced as “false” a supposed U.S. government statement that purported to identify various “political leaders in Mexico with ties to drug cartels.”

The embassy published the “false” statement to social media on Tuesday in a post that included a five-word message:

“WARNING. This information is false.”

The Embassy of Mexico in the United States also denounced the statement as “false.”

“About the supposed information that circulates on some [social media] accounts regarding a statement of the [U.S.] Department of State about Mexico, this embassy confirms that it is completely false,” it said.

Which politicians were named in the fake statement?

The statement denounced by the U.S. and Mexican embassies includes a U.S. Department of Homeland Security seal and has the heading “DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLITICAL LEADERS IN MEXICO WITH TIES TO DRUG CARTELS.”

It states:

“The State Department has confirmed the implementation of a secret sanctions mechanism targeting Mexican political figures identified as having ties to drug cartels. Marina del Pilar [Ávila], the Governor of Baja California, for her association with the leader of the ‘Los Rusos’ drug cartel in Baja California.

Ruben Rocha Moya (Sinaloa)

Américo Villareal (Tamaulipas)

Samuel García (Nuevo León)

Layda Sansores (Campeche)

Ricardo Monreal Ávila (Ex-Governor, Zacatecas)”

Rocha, Villareal, García and Sansores are current state governors. Monreal is the leader of the ruling Morena party in the lower house of Congress.

The context 

The circulation of the fake statement on social media and the U.S. and Mexican embassies’ denunciation of it came after Marina del Pilar Ávila revealed last month that the United States had revoked tourist visas for her and her husband, Carlos Torres Torres.

The Baja California governor asserted she hadn’t done anything wrong, declaring that the revocation of her visa was “an administrative decision, not an accusation.”

She rejected claims that she is involved in money laundering. The United States government hasn’t revealed the reason why it revoked the tourist visas of Ávila and Torres, who, like his wife, is a Morena party politician.

Citing unnamed United States officials, the U.S. investigative journalism organization ProPublica reported on May 15 that “the Trump administration has begun to impose travel restrictions and other sanctions on prominent Mexican politicians whom it believes are linked to drug corruption.”

“So far, two Mexican political figures have acknowledged being banned from traveling to the United States,” ProPublica said, referring to Ávila and her husband.

“But U.S. officials said they expect more Mexicans to be targeted as the administration works through a list of several dozen political figures who have been identified by law enforcement and intelligence agencies as having ties to the drug trade. The list includes leaders of President Claudia Sheinbaum’s governing party, several state governors and political figures close to her predecessor, former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, the U.S. officials said.”

A few days before ProPublica published its report, journalist Salvador García Soto wrote in a column for the newspaper El Universal that the Trump administration, “through its powerful Secretary of State Marco Rubio has commenced the ‘hunt’ for Mexican politicians, which, according to their investigations, have links to drug trafficking.”

García asserted that the Department of State has a so-called “list of Marco” that includes “at least 44 names of prominent officials and politicians” from Mexico with alleged links to drug trafficking, including federal ministers, governors, mayors and lawmakers.

He wrote that the list includes “politicians from all existing parties in Mexico,” but “the majority of those mentioned are active members of Morena, the party of President Sheinbaum, and some have a very close relationship with her and with the ex-president López Obrador.”

Asked on May 15 about a supposed U.S. “narcolista,” or “narco-list,” that includes the names of “narcogobernadores” (narco-governors) and other officials, Sheinbaum responded:

“There are a lot of rumors. They are rumors.”

She said that her government had not received any notification from the United States government about the existence of “lists” of politicians with links to drug cartels.

“In this case, you ask the Department of State and you’re told ‘No, there is nothing,’” Sheinbaum said.

On Wednesday, she expressed surprise that the U.S. Embassy felt the need to denounce the fake statement (and clearly fake at that) that has been disseminated on social media.

For its part, the government of Tamaulipas last month rejected claims that Villareal’s U.S. visa had been revoked.

ProPublica said in its report that the Morena party governor of the northern border state “has been frequently accused of having ties to drug trafficking, which he has denied.”

In early 2024, ProPublica, German state-owned news organization Deutsche Welle and crime-focused media outlet Insight Crime all published reports that said that people working for the 2018 presidential election campaign of former president López Obrador received between US $2 million and $4 million from drug traffickers affiliated with the Beltrán-Leyva Organization and the Sinaloa Cartel.

López Obrador rejected the reports, describing them as “completely false.”

By Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies (peter.davies@mexiconewsdaily.com)

spot_img

Dates: The natural sweetness your body will thank you for

Screenshot

by The El Reportero staff

In a world where we are increasingly conscious of what we eat, dates are re-emerging as an ancient food packed with health benefits. This fruit, native to the Middle East and cultivated for over 6,000 years, has been part of the diet of numerous cultures for one simple reason: it is a true natural superfood.

Eaten both fresh and dried, dates stand out for their sweet flavor, fleshy texture, and versatility in the kitchen. But beyond their culinary value, this fruit has a nutritional profile worthy of attention.

A Natural Source of Energy

One of the most obvious benefits of dates is their high energy content. With approximately 280 calories per 100 grams, mostly from natural sugars such as glucose and fructose, dates are an excellent snack for athletes or people with high physical demands. Unlike processed foods loaded with refined sugar, dates provide clean energy, along with fiber and micronutrients.

Rich in fiber and digestively healthy

Fiber is an essential component for healthy digestion, and dates are a good source of it. Consuming dates regularly can promote intestinal transit, prevent constipation, and help maintain a balanced gut microbiota. In fact, it is estimated that just three medium-sized dates can provide around 2 grams of fiber.

Furthermore, due to their satiating effect, they can be an ally in weight-control diets, as long as they are consumed in moderation.

Potassium and more: a cocktail of micronutrients

Dates are also rich in minerals, especially potassium, an essential electrolyte for muscle function and cardiovascular health. A few dates can provide as much potassium as a small banana.

They also contain magnesium, calcium, iron, and vitamin B6, key nutrients for the functioning of the nervous system, red blood cell production, and protein metabolism.

Antioxidants that Protect

It’s not just their sweetness that makes dates special: they are also an important source of natural antioxidants such as flavonoids, carotenoids, and phenolic acid, which help combat oxidative damage caused by free radicals.

Regular consumption of antioxidants is associated with a reduced risk of chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases. In this sense, dates represent a natural and tasty way to maintain long-term health.

A Substitute for Processed Sugar

More and more people are turning to dates as a natural sweetener. Grinding them can produce a thick paste that serves as a healthy sugar substitute in desserts, smoothies, breads, and cookies. Unlike refined sugar, which lacks nutrients, this date paste retains all the nutritional benefits of the original fruit. Furthermore, their moderate glycemic index means that their consumption does not cause sudden spikes in blood glucose, especially when accompanied by healthy fats or proteins.

How to incorporate them into your diet

Dates can be enjoyed alone as a snack, stuffed with nuts, in salads, yogurts, desserts, and even in savory dishes like tagines or couscous. One of the most appreciated varieties is the Medjool, known for its large size and softness, making them ideal for eating unprocessed.

It is recommended to store them in a cool place or in the refrigerator if they are fresh, and check for mold or fermentation before eating them.

A sweet legacy

Far from being a passing fad, dates remind us that nature offers sweet, healthy, and sustainable options. In a context where many people are looking to reduce their consumption of sugar and ultra-processed products, this fruit is positioned as a simple, effective, and delicious alternative.

More than just a fruit, dates are a legacy of nutritional wisdom that continues to bear fruit, from desert oases to modern tables.

spot_img

Bay Area’s homelessness crisis: Cities and counties struggle to work together

San Francisco police officers keep an eye on city workers as they sweep unsanctioned tents and belongings from a street in the Tenderloin. Martin Kaste/NPR -- Agentes de policía de San Francisco vigilan a los trabajadores municipales mientras retiran tiendas de campaña y pertenencias no autorizadas de una calle en Tenderloin. Martin Kaste/NPR

by the El Reportero’s staff

Despite billions spent over the last decade, the San Francisco Bay Area’s homelessness crisis continues to grow — driven by soaring rents, mental health and addiction challenges, and most critically, a lack of coordination between cities and counties.

The structural divide in California’s system exacerbates the issue: cities are tasked with building shelters and housing, while counties handle behavioral health and addiction services. Without close collaboration, critical gaps emerge, and many fall through the cracks. From San Francisco to San Jose, political leaders push bold strategies — often in conflict with each other and lacking cohesive support.

San Francisco: Service cuts vs. prevention initiatives

In San Francisco, Mayor Daniel Lurie’s $15.9 billion budget for 2025-26 includes deep cuts to homelessness programs, slashing funding for nonprofits that provide food, shelter, and other support. Advocates warn this will destabilize already vulnerable populations and undermine past progress.

Simultaneously, Lurie launched the Family Homelessness Prevention Pilot, partnering with Tipping Point Community. The 18-month initiative aims to keep families housed by offering cash aid, employment support, and legal assistance. While the concept has been praised, many question its viability amid broader budget reductions.

“There’s a contradiction in cutting services while launching new ones,” a Coalition on Homelessness representative said. “You can’t prevent homelessness if you’re also defunding the safety net.”

San Jose’s “responsibility to shelter” sparks debate

In San Jose, Mayor Matt Mahan introduced a “Responsibility to Shelter” policy that would penalize individuals who refuse shelter more than three times in 18 months, potentially leading to misdemeanor charges if they remain in encampments.

Mahan argues the city has invested significantly in interim housing — from tiny home villages to motel conversions — and believes residents should be required to accept shelter when it’s available.

“We’ve built the shelter. We’ve built the housing. Now we need a framework to require people to use it,” Mahan said.

Critics, including civil rights advocates and Santa Clara County officials, argue the policy is punitive and may criminalize people who avoid shelter for valid reasons, such as past trauma or restrictive facility rules. Santa Clara County, responsible for healthcare and case management services, has not endorsed the policy. Supervisor Susan Ellenberg stressed that counties cannot be expected to support growing city programs without a say in their design or funding.

“Cities can’t keep building and expect counties to endlessly fund support services,” Ellenberg said. “We need planning — not mandates.”

Oakland and Alameda County: A disjointed partnership

In Oakland, the divide between city and county is especially stark. The city handles shelters and outreach, while Alameda County manages behavioral health and supportive housing. But collaboration has been lacking.

When Oakland dismantled the large Union Point Park encampment in 2023, some residents were offered shelter — others were simply displaced. Advocates say the county failed to deploy needed mental health teams, leaving vulnerable individuals without help.

A 2022 Alameda County Grand Jury report highlighted the dysfunction, citing confusion, redundancy, and poor outcomes due to the absence of unified governance. Though some leaders have floated the idea of a regional homelessness authority, no substantial action has followed.

Fremont: Enforcement without infrastructure

In Fremont, officials have taken a harder stance, passing a controversial ordinance that bans camping in specific areas and punishes those who “aid and abet” the unhoused. Critics say the law is overly punitive, especially since Fremont lacks permanent shelter beds and relies on county-run facilities, which are often full.

“Fremont criminalized homelessness without offering a realistic alternative,” said a legal advocate with the ACLU of Northern California. “That’s not governance — that’s abdication.”

The city says the ordinance is intended to protect public spaces and encourage shelter use, but without adequate housing options, advocates view the policy as symbolic enforcement over real solutions.

Cities vs. counties: An undefined relationship

Throughout the Bay Area, the homelessness response is hampered by the lack of a formal structure outlining shared responsibilities between cities and counties. With budget pressures mounting, each side blames the other. Cities hesitate to fund services viewed as county obligations, while counties resist city-driven expansions that require ongoing support.

Senate Bill 16, a recent legislative effort, proposed requiring counties to cover 50% of city shelter costs to qualify for state homelessness funds. However, county opposition led to the bill being gutted. San Jose’s Mahan backed the bill, warning that cities are “at capacity” and cannot expand services without shared accountability.

“We’re leaving people outside because the system isn’t scaling,” Mahan said.

Conclusion: A call for unified action

The Bay Area’s homelessness crisis is not just a funding issue — it’s a governance failure. While cities move at varying speeds, counties face limits without influence over policy direction or budget control. Without a statewide mandate or regional coordination framework, efforts remain fragmented and often counterproductive.

As cities like San Francisco launch new programs while cutting existing ones, San Jose pursues enforcement-based strategies, and Oakland and Fremont struggle with disconnected policies, the overarching issue remains clear: disjointed leadership is blocking meaningful progress.

Until cities and counties align on responsibilities, funding, and goals, the region’s unhoused population will continue to suffer from the consequences of bureaucratic dysfunction.

– With reports from CalMatters and wire services.

spot_img

Sheinbaum: 50 percent steel and aluminum tariff is ‘unjust’ and ‘has no legal basis’

by Mexico News Daiily

The United States’ 50 percent tariff on imports of steel and aluminum — which took effect today — is “unjust,” “unsustainable” and “has no legal basis,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said Wednesday.

Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said Tuesday that Mexico would seek an exclusion from the tariff, which doubles the 25 percent duty that the United States imposed on steel and aluminum imports in March. If it doesn’t get one, the Mexican government will announce its response next week, Sheinbaum said.

U.S. President Donald Trump announced his plan to double the tariff on steel and aluminum imports last Friday.

“We’re going to bring it from 25 percent to 50 percent — the tariffs on steel into the United States of America, which will even further secure the steel industry in the United States,” he said at an event in Pennsylvania.

Trump signed an executive order to impose the higher tariff on Tuesday.

“I have determined that it is necessary to increase the previously described steel and aluminum tariffs to adjust the imports of steel and aluminum articles and their derivative articles so that such imports will not threaten to impair the national security,” Trump said in the order.

“In my judgment, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminum in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminum industries.”

A White House fact sheet said that Trump is “taking action to end unfair trade practices and the global dumping of steel and aluminum.”

“Foreign nations have been flooding the United States market with cheap steel and aluminum, often subsidized by their governments,” the White House said.

Last year, the United States and Mexico announced a series of steps aimed at curbing the circumvention of previous U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, particularly targeting products from China shipped through Mexico.

The new 50 percent tariff, like the 25 percent one it replaced, was imposed in accordance with Section 232 of the United States Trade Expansion Act, rather than the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which Trump has used to impose separate duties on most countries from around the world, including Mexico.

Mexico is the world’s second-largest exporter of steel, aluminum and products derived from those metals to the United States, according to 2024 data from the U.S. Department of Commerce. The value of those Mexican exports to the U.S. was US $34.83 billion last year, second only to China.

Sheinbaum: ‘It’s a measure we consider unjust’ 

Sheinbaum responded to the implementation of the higher tariff at her Wednesday morning press conference.

“It’s a measure we consider unjust,” she told reporters.

“It’s a measure for the whole world, not just for Mexico, the tariff is increased for all countries of the world with the exception of Great Britain, which stays at 25 percent,” Sheinbaum said.

“… In the case of Mexico, firstly, it’s unjust … because as we have said several times, Mexico imports more [from the United States] than it exports in steel and aluminum. Formally, a tariff is imposed when there is a deficit,” she said.

“… Secondly, from our perspective, it has no legal basis because there is a trade agreement,” Sheinbaum said, referring to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA.

She noted that the United States imposed the steel and aluminum tariff for national security reasons, before highlighting that “yesterday the White House spokeswoman said there is good collaboration with Mexico in all terms, including on the issue of security.”

“So we don’t think there is a basis” to impose the tariff on imports from Mexico, Sheinbaum said.

She also said that a tariff on Mexican steel and aluminum is “unsustainable because, as is the case with cars,” products containing steel cross the border during the production process.

Sheinbaum noted that she would discuss the issue with representatives of Mexico’s National Chamber of the Steel and Iron Industry on Wednesday, and highlighted that Ebrard would meet with U.S. officials on Friday.

She said that if Mexico fails to reach an agreement with the United States, her government will announce its response — but not an “eye for an eye” one — next week.

“Our responsibility is first to protect the employment of Mexicans, and second [to protect] the steel industry. A 50 percent tariff represents a very big impact for the steel industry,” Sheinbaum said.

“… We don’t agree [with the tariff], we don’t think it’s just or sustainable because it raises the price of everything. We hope to reach an agreement,” she said.

Ebrard: Steel tariff will have to be adjusted because economic impact will be ‘very big’ 

Ebrard told reporters on Tuesday that he doesn’t believe the 50 percent tariff can be sustained long term.

“As has happened with other [U.S.] tariffs, it will have to be adjusted because the economic impact is very big,” he said.

Indeed, Trump has made various changes to tariffs he has announced since returning to the White House in January. By doing so, and much to his chagrin, he gave rise to the acronym TACO — “Trump always chickens out.”

Ebrard described the 50 percent tariff on Mexican steel and aluminum as “unjust for Mexico because United States has a surplus” on the trade of those metals.

“It doesn’t make sense to impose a tariff on a product on which you have a surplus,” he said, repeating an argument he has made before.

The economy minister said he will formally ask for an exclusion from the tariff when he meets with U.S. officials in Washington D.C. on Friday.

“How do I see this measure? I see it as unjust, unsustainable and inconvenient,” he said.

Ebrard has been attempting to negotiate more favorable trading conditions between Mexico and the United States for months, and has made regular trips to Washington since Trump began his second term.

Before the U.S. tariff on steel and aluminum doubled, he had been attempting to win an exemption from the 25 percent duty on those metals as well as a U.S. tariff on foreign cars.

It remains to be seen whether Ebrard will be able to get any concessions from the United States government at his meeting on Friday.

In addition to the steel, aluminum and auto tariffs, Mexican goods not covered by the USMCA also face 25 percent duties when entering the United States.

The United States Court of International Trade last week ruled that Trump had exceeded his authority in using the IEEPA to impose fentanyl trafficking-related duties on non-USMCA compliant goods, but the U.S. government promptly appealed the decision and obtained a stay on the trade court’s ruling.

By Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies (peter.davies@mexiconewsdaily.com)

 

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1928574028022698383

spot_img
123...632Page 1 of 632

SELECTIONS

POPULAR TICKETS

POPULAR CATEGORY

ABOUT US

Welcome to our Marvin J. Ramirez website! We are an innovative newspaper located in the heart of San Francisco. With a relentless passion for telling powerful stories, we inform our community with truthful news, insightful analysis, and compelling reporting.

Contacto: lreportero@aol.com

FOLLOW US

© Copyright 2023. AMAYCOM.NET. All rights reserved.