by QMI Agency
Many artificial food dyes that color everything from breakfast cereal to ice cream should be banned because they pose cancer risks, a new report from the Center for Science in the Public Interest says.
“These synthetic chemicals do absolutely nothing to improve the nutritional quality or safety of foods, but trigger behavior problems in children and, possibly, cancer in anybody,” said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson, co-author of the report, Food Dyes: A Rainbow of Risks.
Manufacturers worldwide each year use about seven million kilograms of artificial colors in common prepared foods like cookies, candy, pop and ice cream.
The three most widely used food dyes —Red 40, Yellow 5 and Yellow 6 — are known to be contaminated with carcinogens, the Washington-based health watchdog organization said. Evidence suggests, but does not prove, that other dyes — Blue 1, Blue 2, Green 3 and Red 40 — cause cancer in animals, the CSPI report said.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration already recognizes Red 3 as a carcinogen, but the Ronald Reagan administration prevented a ban being placed on Red 3, as required by U.S. law in the case of any food additive known to cause cancer.
About 100,000 kg of Red 3 dye are used annually world wide in processing food.
As of Tuesday, European food manufacturers will be required to add a warning on product packaging if the product contains one of six artificial colors linked to cancer and other health issues.
Hair dyes used by millions of women are linked to chemicals that can cause cancer Secondary amines can be found in hair dyes used by millions of Britons Both home coloring kits and salon dye can contain chemicals Could react with smoke and fumes and form highly poisonous chemicals Hair dyes used by millions of women are linked to chemicals that can cause cancer Secondary amines can be found in hair dyes used by millions of Britons. Both home coloring kits and salon dye can contain chemicals. Could react with smoke and fumes and form highly poisonous chemicals
by Fiona Macrae
Hair dyes used by millions of women contain chemicals linked to cancer, British scientists have warned.
They say that both home hair coloring kits and the dyes used at expensive salons pose a potential risk to health.
Writing in a respected scientific journal, they say chemicals in permanent hair dyes can react with tobacco smoke and other pollutants in the air to form one of the most powerful cancer-causing compounds known to man.
With more than a third of women and one in ten men regularly coloring their hair, the researchers say it is ‘imperative’ that the risk to health is quantified.
However, the cosmetics industry has strongly disputed the claim.
The warning comes from scientists at Leedsbased company Green Chemicals who conducted a review of the chemistry surrounding hair dye. They said that all the information was already available and they simply ‘joined the dots’ to make the link with cancer.
They warn that chemicals called secondary amines, which are either found in all permanent hair dyes or are formed in them, can penetrate the skin and stay on the hair for weeks, months or even years after the dye is applied.
Over time, they could react with tobacco smoke and exhaust fumes, to form highly poisonous chemicals called N-nitrosamines. Known to cause cancer, these are banned from use in cosmetics.
But the Leeds reasearchers argue that they can still be generated via a simple chemical reaction.
Hair dye has previously been linked to a range of cancers, including tumors of the breast, bladder, ovaries and brain and leukemia.
There are also concerns that increasing numbers of people are becoming allergic to their contents, sometimes with fatal results.
The sale of home hair dye kits alone is worth an estimated £321million a year and the figure is expected to rise as the population ages.
Professor David Lewis, one of the authors of the study, and an expert in the chemistry of various dyes, said: ‘At this stage, we can’t be sure of the amount of Nnitrosamines produced or the level of risk these compounds pose but it is clear a potential hazard exists.
‘In the interest of consumer safety, it is imperative that a thorough and independent investigation is conducted to establish the levels of toxicity of these compounds and the potential risks.’
A spokesman for Green Chemicals, which is about to launch its own ‘ultra-safe’ range of hair dyes, said that despite numerous studies of the subject the danger posed by the chemicals in hair dye reacting with the air has been missed or ignored until now.
But manufacturers insisted that the possibility of the chemical reaction has been long known.
Dr Emma Meredith, of the Cosmetic, Toiletry & Perfumery Association, said the law forbids using secondary amines in a form that can react in this way.
George Hammer, the owner of Urban Retreat at Harrods, the world’s largest hair and beauty salon, said: ‘Chemical companies have a huge vested interest in keeping this under wraps.’
The warning is set out in the journal Materials.
In 2009 the Mail revealed that women who use hair dyes more than nine times a year have a 60 per cent greater risk of contracting blood cancer. A year later the European Commission banned 22 hair dyes, which put long term users at risk of bladder cancer.
