Sunday, June 8, 2025
Home Blog Page 8

Is globalism on the ropes? Or is it simply rebranding?

Klaus Schwab

Even if the globalist project were ‘on the ropes,’ it could very well be replaced by a digital deep state made possible by the growing power of AI and its partnership with government

Editor’s note from LifeSite co-founder Steve Jalsevac: This is an extremely important report. Note that newly-appointed yet unelected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is mentioned several times in this discussion about globalist influencers. Carney is portrayed as one of the leading globalists in the world. How many Canadians are aware of this and understand its grave implications for Canada? Trudeau was only a puppet. Carney has been a puppet master.

by Frank Wright

(LifeSiteNews) — Is the liberal-globalist order finished – or is it simply “rebranding?” That is the question posed by Clayton Morris to Mel K, as they discuss the “remarkable coincidence” of the retirement of WEF leader Klaus Schwab and the death of Pope Francis in a new episode of “Redacted.”

Editor’s note from LifeSite co-founder Steve Jalsevac: This is an extremely important report. Note that newly-appointed yet unelected Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is mentioned several times in this discussion about globalist influencers. Carney is portrayed as one of the leading globalists in the world. How many Canadians are aware of this and understand its grave implications for Canada? Trudeau was only a puppet. Carney has been a puppet master.

(LifeSiteNews) — Is the liberal-globalist order finished – or is it simply “rebranding?” That is the question posed by Clayton Morris to Mel K, as they discuss the “remarkable coincidence” of the retirement of WEF leader Klaus Schwab and the death of Pope Francis in a new episode of “Redacted.”

“What are the chances my friends?” asks Morris. “Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum resigns and then immediately we also see WEF globalist Pope Francis … suddenly died on the same day.”

As Morris says, “It’s all very strange” – but what does it mean?

Morris says “WEF globalist Pope Francis was working with Klaus Schwab to form a one-world government” before asking:

“Are the globalists on the ropes right now and collapsing, or are they restructuring?”

He speaks to Mel K, author of Americans Anonymous and a campaigner for the restoration of “people power” to recapture America and its institutions from the grip of the worldwide social revolutionaries of globalism.

According to her, the globalist remnant is still in place but “reeling.” Powerful figures such as “Larry Fink – Mark Carney – [Friedrich] Merz” and the EU are all still in place and are responding in shock to Trump’s moves to reshape the American nation and the global order. This is seen in how they are “reacting to Trump’s tariffs – and their own lack of ability to go forward without America.”

The danger here, she says, is that the liberal-global model is a war economy at base – and this is why Trump’s drive to end the “forever wars” is countered by moves to spark global conflict:

“In order to continue on this road, they are pushing towards World War Three.”

Why does the globalist elite want war?

“They need the war to keep their financial model going,” Mel K explains, saying globalism is essentially a business – of death – and that peace would be fatal to its power.

“They are all partners of the world economic forum … pushing towards war by any means necessary to keep the financial system structure.”

Mel K sees the globalists as the self-appointed CEOs of Earth Inc.: “This is a group of people who look at the world as if ‘we own this planet; we are the holding company.’”

She argues that from its inception a century ago, the liberal global system has been based on the business of war – and the propaganda techniques used to sell them.

“The model has always been based around paying for both sides of wars in order to create a war economy.”

Mel K believes that the globalist project is responding to the threat of peace by “rebranding” – and not going quietly away. This threat is evident not only in the moves made by Trump to dissolve the former system, but also in European and Central American leaders such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele, who represent the post-global alternative of sanity, security, and a return to Christianity.

Even if the globalist project were indeed “on the ropes,” as Morris suggested, Mel K warns of its replacement by a digital deep state. With the growing power of artificial intelligence and its partnership with government – without government oversight – she warns that the total surveillance state proposed after the September 11 attacks may become a reality if it is not stopped.

Speaking to the threat of an AI-powered digital globalism – she says, “We are at a place where that is the battle.”

Yet the threat of digital globalism does not come only from the WEF and its allies. It also has a long history, going back to the attacks which sparked the “war on terror” and the rapid growth of surveillance, “security” measures, and what Matt Taibbi called “the censorship-industrial complex.”

“This goes back to 9/11,” Mel K tells Morris, explaining how “now we have all the tech bros” such as Elon Musk and Palantir’s Alex Karp – adjacent to the Trump administration or even in it.

“We can’t be too pro-anything that promises safety or security,” says Mel K, warning of the uncertainty in this moment of global change – and the danger of an all-powerful “global technocracy” emerging with promises of bringing stability and an all-too-familiar technological utopia.

As LifeSiteNews reported in January, the liberal global order celebrated by the Deep State and the Deep Church may simply be replaced by a new digital globalism.

One early sign of its emergence is the development of “precrime” profiling by AI in the UK and the U.S., where suspects can be identified by algorithm before they have committed a crime.

The people with this power are already working with the U.S. government.

As Clayton Morris reports, “Palantir is now working with DOGE.” The global company, named after the “all-seeing” stones of Saruman in The Lord of the Rings, is dedicated to assembling the sort of worldwide “total information awareness” rejected by the U.S. Congress after 9/11. It is a private entity out of government reach and oversight whose business model is to see and know everything.

It’s good to see “Dr Evil” stepping down, says Morris of the retirement of Schwab, but warns the global system is like “a hydra.”

He says many Americans are blinded to the dangers of global government by algorithm because they “like JD Vance.”

“Just ignore those ties to Palantir,” says Morris, sarcastically referring to the close relationship between the U.S. vice president and Peter Thiel – co-founder of Palantir and former business associate of Elon Musk at PayPal.

Call for prosecutions of treason

The two then speak of “frustrations” over the lack of criminal prosecutions of former U.S. officials who have “betrayed” Americans whilst in office.

“If they just went after some of the money and some of the players, we the people will start to actually feel we are in good shape.”

Morris and Mel K call for “following the money” – towards justice.

“We just want arrests,” says Morris. “We want prosecutions of these people.”

“They did it to Trump!” agrees Mel K, who begins to name names.

“What about Samantha Power?” asks Mel K, referring to the former USAID chief. “Or Mayorkas? These people betrayed the people of the United States.”

Alejandro Mayorkas, former head of the Department for Homeland Security, answered impeachment procedures over his “willful and systemic refusal to comply with the law” in admitting millions of illegal migrants by invoking the Holocaust. He was further charged with having “breached the public trust” – and lying to Congress. Attempts to impeach him were denounced as “antisemitic.”

“He didn’t get a pardon,” says Mel K, before moving on to the notorious campaign around Hunter Biden’s laptop. She cites “the fifty-one intelligence agents that conspired to lie to the country before an election” as a further example of treasonous officials who should answer for their crimes.

“If it was the other side they would have been indicted in four days.” That explains the “frustration” with the Trump administration, she said.

As Mel K argues in her book, people power is not only urgently required in the United States – but is practically possible. She says now is the time for communities to organize for justice, for their own interests against those of the corrupt elite – and shows how it can be done.

As LifeSiteNews has noted in the past, the emerging digital deep state is built on stolen goods – the details of your life – and the demand for a “data dividend” could fatally undermine the ballooning power of companies such as Oracle and Palantir, whose algorithms are created from every detail of your life they harvest online.

With the globalists struggling for world war and a sales pitch to save their brand from suicide, both Morris and Mel K remind viewers that people power can – and should – make a difference at this critical moment.

spot_img

Francis, the People’s Pope, went to heaven when Jesus is risen

by Marvin Ramírez

With the death of Pope Francis, the world bids farewell not only to a religious leader, but to a profoundly human figure, whose words and actions resonated beyond the confines of the Vatican, even beyond the walls of the Catholic Church. Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio on December 17, 1936, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, this son of Italian immigrants became the first Latin American pope and the first to choose the name Francis, inspired by Saint Francis of Assisi, a symbol of humility, peace, and love for the poor.

Since his election to the throne of Peter in March 2013, his papacy was a breath of fresh air—and at times a hurricane of wind—for a Church anchored in centuries of tradition. With a humble smile, simple shoes, and without the trappings of power typical of his predecessors, Francis made a difference from day one. He rejected the papal palace as a residence and preferred to live in a modest room in the Casa Santa Marta in the Vatican. These weren’t just symbolic gestures; they were clear signs of a pope who wanted to return to the roots of the Gospel.

Francis will be remembered for his unwavering defense of the poor, migrants, and the marginalized. In a Church sometimes perceived as out of touch with reality, he insisted on an “outgoing Church,” a Church that doesn’t withdraw into itself but reaches out to those in need. His papacy was marked by trips to the most forgotten corners of the planet: from refugee camps in Lesbos to the slums of Africa and Latin America. His phrase “Make a mess!” addressed to young people in Rio de Janeiro in 2013 became a call to action, to not settle for an unjust world.

But his leadership was not without controversy. Francis addressed thorny issues such as homosexuality, priestly celibacy, the ordination of women, and even the Church’s role in climate change with a frankness that disconcerted more conservative sectors of Catholicism. His encyclical Laudato Si’, in which he exhorted care for our “common home,” was applauded by environmentalists and criticized by climate change skeptics. His pastoral openness toward LGBTQ+ people—”Who am I to judge?”—sparked an earthquake within the Church, provoking both applause and strong resistance.

Internal reform of the Vatican was another bold undertaking. He fought corruption in the Roman Curia and sought transparency in the Holy See’s finances. His crusade against sexual abuse by members of the clergy was firm but criticized by some as insufficient. However, his willingness to listen to victims and his commitment to “zero tolerance” marked a shift from past attitudes.

As a Spanish speaker, Francis was a cultural and spiritual bridge between Rome and Latin America. His voice resonated with particular force among Spanish-speaking peoples, who saw in him not only the successor of Peter, but also one of their own. He spoke in clear, direct Spanish, often incorporating River Plate idioms, and his pastoral style was imbued with the warmth and closeness of a neighborhood priest. His election as Pope was experienced as a symbolic triumph for a continent deeply Catholic, yet historically neglected in the circles of ecclesiastical power.

Now, with his passing, the entire world—faithful and non-believers alike—stops to contemplate the mark left by this elderly pastor. Despite criticism, internal tensions within the Church, and the global challenges he faced, Pope Francis managed to re-enchant many with a faith lived from compassion and mercy. His life was a testimony that the Gospel can be radically human, profoundly political, and, at the same time, mystical. Francis wasn’t a perfect pope—none has ever been—but he was, without a doubt, a necessary pope. And in the end, as happens with great people, even his harshest critics recognized the coherence of his life and the honesty of his struggle. Everyone expressed their love and respect for this simple man, who dared to bear the weight of the symbolic scepter of the Apostle Peter, not like a throne, but like a shepherd’s crook. A shepherd who smelled of sheep, as he himself requested, and who walked among us with the tenderness of one who knows that true power is found in service.

Rest in peace, Pope Francis. The world mourns you, but also thanks you.

spot_img

A Model to Follow: US Treasury Highlights Argentina’s Economic Policies in New Agreement with the IMF

Argentine President Javier Milei and U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Presidency -- El presidente argentino Javier Milei y el secretario del Tesoro estadounidense Scott Bessent.Presidencia

by El Reportero Staff

During his speech at the 2025 Global Outlook Forum in Washington, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent praised the economic measures implemented by the government of Argentine President Javier Milei, within the framework of the recent financing agreement reached with the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

“Argentina represents a suitable model. The country deserves the IMF’s support, given that it has made significant progress in aligning itself with the required economic criteria,” Bessent stated, in what appeared to be a clear gesture of support for the South American country’s economic management.

The official recalled his visit to Buenos Aires in early April, where he met with Milei and the Minister of Economy, Luis Caputo. According to Bessent, the purpose of the trip was to express the US administration’s support for the reforms undertaken by Argentina.

He even anticipated that a potential adverse global economic scenario—fueled by an escalation in the trade war fueled by former President Donald Trump—could trigger a special line of financing for Argentina through the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), a tool historically used by the US to support countries facing currency crises. This was reported by various Argentine media outlets.

In other unrelated news:

“Addicted to love”: Petro rejects drug addiction accusations and responds with irony

Colombian President Gustavo Petro addressed recent accusations made by former Foreign Minister Álvaro Leyva, who in an open letter accused him of alleged drug addiction problems. In response, the president asserted this Wednesday that his only addiction is “to love.”

“We fall in love a lot. I’m going to say we’re addicted to love, on purpose,” Petro said during an official ceremony to enact laws related to animal protection. His statements struck a tone somewhere between ironic and reflective, referring to reports of his two-day disappearance during a visit to Paris in 2023—a fact cited by Leyva as evidence of possible drug use.

Petro not only denied the accusations but also took the opportunity to recall that he underwent surgery for esophageal cancer in Cuba in 2020. According to him, his body has since become intolerant of alcohol. “Unfortunately, I can’t get drunk. I liked Tapa Roja aguardiente, but now even my soul burns just by tasting it,” he confessed.

In this way, the Colombian head of state sought to dismiss rumors about his health and habits, stating that beyond speculation, his medical condition precludes any use of substances that could affect his physical condition.

spot_img

America’s bold ban on food dyes could spark global health revolution

by Marvin Ramírez and wire services

When did the United States start flooding its food with synthetic additives and petroleum-based dyes? The precise moment is hard to pin down, but the trend surged during the mid-20th century when processed foods took over grocery shelves. Bright colors became marketing gold, masking the growing presence of low-quality ingredients in candies, cereals, sodas, and snacks.

Now, decades later, a major turning point has arrived—one that may not only reshape the American food system but could also set a powerful precedent for countries around the globe. In a landmark announcement this week, FDA Commissioner Marty Makary unveiled sweeping reforms under the “Make America Healthy Again” initiative, spearheaded by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“The FDA is effectively removing all petroleum-based food dyes from the U.S. food supply,” Makary declared during a press conference. “These steps represent a new era in food safety and public health.”

The FDA’s bold plan includes three key actions. First, it will establish a national standard for transitioning to natural dye alternatives. Second, it will revoke authorization for certain synthetic colorings, such as citrus red number two and orange B. Third, it aims to eliminate six of the most commonly used synthetic dyes—red 40, yellow 5 and 6, blue 1 and 2, and green 3—by the end of 2026. Manufacturers are also being urged to remove red dye number 3 ahead of the previously extended deadlines.

These measures, officials say, are not just about policy—they’re a response to a groundswell of public demand. “Republican, Democrat, and independent moms showed up in high numbers to vote for President Trump on this very issue,” Makary noted, adding that “moms across America have spoken, and they want more honesty and humility from our nation’s healthcare leaders.”

Secretary Kennedy, known for his health advocacy and vocal skepticism of industry influence, believes this is just the beginning. While critics argue that food dyes are not the most serious health risk compared to tobacco or alcohol, Kennedy insists that allowing such additives amounts to “mass poisoning” of children.

Public concern about the effects of artificial dyes—particularly on children’s behavior and development—has grown steadily over the past decade. European nations, in contrast to the U.S., have long banned or restricted many of these substances. American companies often use safer formulas abroad, raising questions about why U.S. consumers were left behind.

For many, Kennedy’s actions are not only long overdue but inspiring. The move represents a rare moment of political unity, focused not on profits or party lines, but on public well-being. It’s also a rare confrontation with the powerful food and pharmaceutical industries that have long dominated U.S. health policy. And yes—this could come with risks for Kennedy himself.

Big Pharma and corporate food giants are not known for surrendering quietly. Their influence reaches deep into political circles, media narratives, and even scientific research. Could these reforms make Kennedy a target? Possibly. History has shown that when leaders challenge entrenched systems, especially those backed by billions of dollars, their lives and careers often come under threat.

Yet, the significance of these changes transcends American borders. By taking a firm stand against toxic additives, the U.S. sets an example for developing countries, many of which import and replicate American food standards. A healthier America could ripple outward, inspiring global movements to demand cleaner labels, corporate accountability, and safer food for all.

While challenges remain, and some skeptics continue to minimize the impact of food dyes, the momentum is shifting. As more scientific evidence links diet to long-term chronic diseases—from ADHD to obesity and even cancer—public tolerance for artificial enhancements is fading fast.

Ultimately, the FDA’s bold decision could mark the beginning of a new era—one where food nourishes rather than harms, and where public health takes precedence over profits. If Secretary Kennedy succeeds, the future of humanity may look a little brighter, and a lot more natural.

 

spot_img

Newsom takes on Trump over tariffs he says are hurting California

The Port of Los Angeles on October 2, 2021. -- El puerto de Los Ángeles el 2 de octubre de 2021.

Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the lawsuit Wednesday, saying the tariffs hurt “states, consumers and businesses”

by Alexei Koseff

With the state budget hanging precariously in the balance, Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a lawsuit today to block President Donald Trump’s tariff powers.

The lawsuit, which Newsom and Attorney General Rob Bonta filed in federal court in San Francisco, argues that Trump does not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally enact tariffs. Trump cited the United States’ large trade deficit to declare a national emergency earlier this month and impose sweeping import taxes on the rest of the world.

Visiting an almond farm in Turlock, which stands to lose export business to retaliatory tariffs, Newsom expressed anger over the “toxic uncertainty” of the president’s trade policy. He said the policies are harming California more than any other state and called the tariffs a betrayal of the voters who supported Trump because of his promise to bring down the cost of living.

“This is recklessness at another level. The geopolitical impacts are outsized. The trade impacts are outsized,” Newsom said. “No rationale, no plan, no conscience to what it’s doing to real people.”

In a matter of days in early April, Trump invoked the International Emergency Economic

Powers Act of 1977 to establish a universal 10% tariff on all countries importing goods to the United States, with even higher reciprocal tariffs on some nations, then abruptly reversed course hours after they took effect, pausing most of the reciprocal tariffs while ratcheting up the import tax on China to 145%.

The chaos tanked the stock market, a huge risk for California’s forthcoming budget, which depends disproportionately on income tax revenue from capital gains earned by the wealthiest taxpayers. The state is also particularly vulnerable to other economic pain from the tariffs, because China is California’s largest trading partner, propping up manufacturing, agriculture, tourism and major ports in Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland.

Other significant potential impacts for California include driving up the cost of construction materials just as Los Angeles begins rebuilding from a series of devastating fires that flattened several neighborhoods in January.

President Donald Trump listens to Gov. Gavin Newsom upon arrival on Air Force One at Los Angeles International Airport before the president surveys LA fire damage on Jan. 24, 2025. Photo by Mark Schiefelbein, AP Photo — El presidente Donald Trump escucha al gobernador Gavin Newsom a su llegada en el Air Force One al Aeropuerto Internacional de Los Ángeles antes de que el presidente inspeccionara los daños causados ​​por el incendio de Los Ángeles el 24 de enero de 2025. Foto de Mark Schiefelbein, AP Photo

California’s economic outlook is declining

Newsom said today that, anticipating higher inflation and higher unemployment from the tariffs, he has downgraded California’s economic outlook in a revised budget proposal that he plans to unveil next month. Though did not speak to Trump about the lawsuit, he said he gave the White House a heads up.

In a statement, the White House slammed Newsom for undermining Trump’s efforts to rescue American industry.

“Instead of focusing on California’s rampant crime, homelessness, and unaffordability, Gavin Newsom is spending his time trying to block President Trump’s historic efforts to finally address the national emergency of our country’s persistent goods trade deficits,” spokesperson Kush Desai said.

In their lawsuit, the fifteenth that California has filed against the Trump administration since January, Newsom and Bonta asked a judge to immediately pause Trump’s tariffs.

The state contends that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act specifies many remedies a president can take in response to a foreign economic threat, but tariffs are not among them. Without this specific authorization from Congress, the lawsuit argues, Trump’s actions are “unlawful” and “unprecedented.”

Joining Newsom in Turlock, Bonta said Trump was “attempting to override Congress and steamroll the separation of powers” and that his “rogue and erratic tariffs” must be stopped to prevent further damage to California’s economy.

“Trump has had to resort to creating bogus national emergencies that defy reason,” Bonta said. “Bottom line: Trump doesn’t have the singular power to radically upend the country’s economic landscape. That’s not how democracy works.”

Alan Sykes, who teaches international trade law at Stanford Law School, told CalMatters that California’s case has merits, but it may be difficult to win.

He said the international powers act is ambiguous about tariffs; they are not explicitly mentioned in the law, though there is language allowing for the regulation of imports and exports. But Congress has also passed other laws over the years giving away their constitutional power to set tariffs. Sykes noted that Trump could shift to citing those statutes instead if his tariffs are struck down.

“Congress has badly over-delegated authority to the president in this regard,” Sykes said. “I’m not terribly optimistic that the courts are going to rein that in.”

The lawsuit continues Newsom’s shift back toward a more aggressively confrontational stance against the Trump administration. After the Los Angeles wildfires, the governor sought to reset his relationship with Trump as he lobbied for federal disaster aid.

But even though Congress has yet to approve any further assistance for Los Angeles, Newsom has begun more vocally opposing the president’s economic policies in recent weeks.

In the wake of Trump’s tariffs announcement earlier this month, Newsom said California would pursue its own “strategic partnerships” on international trade. The state this week launched a new tourism campaign in Canada, which has been the second largest source of international visitors to California but has already seen a steep decline this year.

Newsom was unusually harsh when speaking about Trump’s tariffs in Turlock, calling them the “poster child” for stupidity and an example of “crony capitalism” because of the president’s willingness to exempt products from favored industries such as electronics manufacturing.

“This is the personification of corruption,” Newsom said. “How in the hell are we sitting by and letting this happen?”

spot_img

Mexico pushes back on US plans to build border military base: Wednesday’s mañanera recapped

There is collaboration, there is communication, but who operates in Mexico are the institutions of the Mexican state," Sheinbaum said in response to questions about the United States' military plans at Mexico's northern border. -- "Hay colaboración, hay comunicación, pero quienes operan en México son las instituciones del Estado mexicano", dijo Sheinbaum en respuesta a preguntas sobre los planes militares de Estados Unidos en la frontera norte de México. (Daniel Augusto/Cuartoscuro)

by Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies 

At her Wednesday morning press conference, President Claudia Sheinbaum rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that her government is afraid of cartels.

On the day she was named as one of “the 100 most influential people of 2025” by Time magazine, she also spoke about the United States’ security maneuverings both north and south of the Mexico-U.S. border.

Mexico sends diplomatic note to US 

A reporter asked the president about the United States’ reported plan to establish a military base on its southern border with Mexico.

The question came after United States Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum traveled to New Mexico on Tuesday to “announce the emergency withdrawal and transfer” to the U.S. Army “of administrative jurisdiction over approximately 109,651 acres of federal land along the U.S.-Mexico border,” according to a Department of the Interior statement.

“… The Department of the Army requested the withdrawal and transfer of these lands on an emergency basis to allow for the increase in regular patrols by federal personnel, construction of infrastructure to prevent unlawful entry, disrupt foreign terrorist threats to the U.S., and to curb illegal cross-border activities, such as unlawful migration, narcotics trafficking, migrant smuggling, and human trafficking,” the statement said.

Citing information from U.S. officials, the Associated Press reported on Monday that “a long sliver of federal land along the U.S.-Mexico border that President Donald Trump is turning over to the Department of Defense would be controlled by the Army as part of a base, which could allow troops to detain any trespassers, including migrants.”

Sheinbaum said on Wednesday that her government was speaking to its U.S. counterpart about its plans for the border region.

She told reporters that Mexico has also sent a diplomatic note to the United States, in which she said her government acknowledges that what the U.S. does “in its own territory” is “a decision for them,” but also expresses its expectation that U.S. military actions won’t “cross the border” and that there will continue to be “the same collaboration there has been until now in security matters.”

“… The last order that was set out is that the [U.S.] army can occupy certain federal territories [along the border]. We don’t know whether it is to continue building the wall [or] what the objective would be, but in any case what we always ask for is respect and coordination,” Sheinbaum said.

Sheinbaum: US ‘always looking to intervene more’ in fight against Mexican cartels 

A week after NBC News reported that the Trump administration is considering carrying out drone strikes on cartels in Mexico, a reporter asked the president whether the United States government has presented any “specific” proposal to her to combat the powerful criminal groups.

“They’re always looking to intervene more,” Sheinbaum responded, explaining that the U.S. government has long had a desire to come into Mexico as part of its efforts to combat organized crime.

Whether Mexico authorizes the U.S. to come into the country to combat cartels “depends very much on the president of the republic who is in office,” she said.

“…[Felipe] Calderón allowed the DEA to carry out operations in our country,” Sheinbaum said, adding that such operations were overseen by U.S. authorities rather than the Mexican government.

“We don’t [allow that]. We say there is collaboration, there is communication, but who operates in Mexico are the institutions of the Mexican state,” she said.

“… And until now there has been good acceptance [of that],” Sheinbaum said, telling reporters that the United States hasn’t done anything in Mexico since she took office without first coming to an agreement with her government.

She said earlier this year that surveillance flights by CIA drones over Mexico only occur after the government of Mexico has requested them in order to obtain information to be able to respond to prevailing “security conditions.”

On Wednesday, Sheinbaum said that United States security agencies “have permits to operate here, but they have rules.”

“In other words, there are agents from United States agencies who are in Mexico, who need permits to be in Mexico, and their way of operating is regulated by the National Security Law and now also by the constitutional reform we did,” she said.

“They have to be in permanent communication with Mexican authorities [and] send reports,” Sheinbaum added.

Sheinbaum staying grounded after appearance on prestigious Time magazine list 

A reporter asked the president about her inclusion on Time magazine’s list of “the 100 most influential people of 2025.”

“There are those who get carried away with these things,” Sheinbaum said before assuring the press corps that isn’t the case with her.

“You always have to keep your feet on the ground,” she said.

by Mexico News Daily chief staff writer Peter Davies (peter.davies@mexiconewsdaily.com)

spot_img

A reminder to call 811 before starting any excavation project

April is National Safe Digging Month, a reminder to call 811 before starting any excavation project, large or small.

Damaging an underground utility line during an excavation can result in thousands of dollars in repair costs.

SAN FRANCISCO, California — Every day in Central and Northern California, underground utility lines are damaged because homeowners and contractors fail to call 811 before starting excavation projects. Digging without knowing the location of underground lines is not only dangerous, but can also result in costly repairs and inconvenient outages. April is recognized as National Safe Digging Month to raise awareness about the importance of calling 811 before starting any excavation project.

Underground utility lines can be shallow, often just inches below the surface due to erosion, previous excavation or landscaping projects, ground shifting or settling, and uneven surfaces. Customers should call 811 at least two business days before beginning any excavation project, large or small, as damaging an underground utility line while digging is dangerous and can leave customers responsible for repair costs averaging $3,500.

“Calling 811 before starting any excavation project will keep you, your family, and neighbors safe and help you avoid costly repairs, averaging $3,500, if an underground line is damaged during excavation. Professional utility line locators will come to your home free of charge and mark the location of underground lines so you can dig safely, knowing what lies beneath,” said Joe Forline, PG&E Senior Vice President of Gas Operations. During the warmer summer months, there will be an increase in the number of digging projects, and unfortunately, many of these projects are being carried out without a toll-free call to 811 to mark utilities at project sites. In fact, according to a recent national survey conducted by the Common Ground Alliance (CGA), 56% of homeowners plan to dig without first calling 811. However, in PG&E’s service area alone, failure to call 811 before digging resulted in more than 1,300 incidents during 2024 in which underground utility lines were damaged due to digging.

2024 in numbers:

  • There were 1,302 incidents in Northern and Central California in which homeowners or contractors damaged underground gas or electric lines while excavating.
  • In 60 percent of incidents where an underground utility line was damaged due to excavation, there was no 811 call.
  • For homeowners specifically, that percentage rises to 89 percent.
  • The average cost to repair a damaged utility line is $3,500.
  • The leading causes of damage to underground utility lines while excavating are: building or repairing a fence, gardening and landscaping, planting a tree or removing a stump, drainage and irrigation work, and building a patio or deck.

Calling 811 is fast and free:

  • Customers should call 811 at least two business days before beginning any project involving excavation, regardless of the size. Customers can also visit 811express.com to have utility lines marked for their project site.
  • Professional workers from all utilities (gas, electric, water, sewer, and telecommunications) will be dispatched to mark the location of all underground utility lines at the project site, either using flags, spray paint, or both.
  • The 811 USA North call center, serving Central and Northern California, is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and offers translation services for Spanish and other languages.

PG&E Tips for Safe Excavation

  • Mark the project area with white: Identify the excavation zone by drawing a box around the area with white paint, white flags, white chalk, or even white flour.
  • Call 811 or submit a request online at least two business days before digging: Have the address and general location of the project, the project start date, and the type of excavation activity available. PG&E and other utilities will identify underground utilities in the area free of charge. Requests can be submitted no later than 14 days before the project begins.
  • Excavating Safety: Use hand tools when excavating within 24 inches of the outer edge of underground lines. Leave utility flags, stakes, or paint markings in place until the project is complete. Backfill and compact the soil.
  • Watch for signs of a natural gas leak: Listen for a “rotten egg” smell, listen for hissing, hissing, or roaring sounds, and look for blown soil, bubbles in a pond or stream, or dead or dying vegetation in a wet area.
spot_img

Raid or rumor? Reports of immigrations sweeps are warping life in California’s Central Valley

Elizabeth Chavez visits her husband, detained by ICE at the Golden State Annex. -- Elizabeth Chávez visita a su esposo, detenido por ICE en el Golden State Annex.

Rumors of immigration raids are changing life from Modesto to Bakersfield, with attendance down in the Fresno Diocese and some families afraid to go outside

by Nigel Duara

Truth be told, there’s a lot of white trucks in Modesto.

White Dodge Rams, white GMC Sierras, white F150s, white Ford Transit vans, white Suburbans, white Silverados, white Chevy Colorados. So many white trucks, all of them American-made: a sure sign of danger to people who read about a January immigration raid 130 miles south and spent the next two months watching for signs of the next one.

Regardless of who’s inside, those big white trucks have become a symbol of federal immigration enforcement in the heart of California’s farm country.

“They usually show up in white trucks, that’s the first signal,” said Lorena Lara, director of organizing for the Valley Watch Network, a coalition of volunteer dispatchers and legal observers who respond to reports of immigration raids in the Central Valley. “Then we look for license plates, they’ll say DHS, or there won’t be a license plate. The trucks have big antennas, like huge, always American-made. Sometimes you can see a divider between the front and the back.

“You don’t know which truck will be immigration (enforcement). And our dispatchers will get calls, saying there are trucks in the area, even if it turns out to be construction workers or something. Families are too scared to pick up their kids (from school). They’re too scared to go grocery shopping.”

New Valley Watch volunteers learn to watch for white trucks and vans as part of their training. Those volunteers said the effect lingers: When they’re driving to the grocery store or parking at the movie theater, they can’t help but notice them. And for a moment, they’re afraid.

This is the stated intention of the Trump administration’s plan to deal with illegal immigration, part of what the president promises will be the largest deportation program in American history.

“If you are here illegally, we will find you and deport you,” said Homeland Security Director Kristi Noem earlier this month. “You will never return. But if you leave now, you may have an opportunity to return and enjoy our freedom and live the American Dream.”

While immigration enforcement agents continue to detain individual people outside of their homes or at the entrance to a Walmart, the deportation program’s larger hope is to encourage people here illegally to self-deport by creating enough fear and mistrust among immigrant communities in places like the Central Valley.

It remains to be seen whether the self-deportation plan is working.

As to whether it’s creating fear — that part is working just fine.

“It feels like you’re on edge all the time,” said Blanca Ojeda, a Valley Response Network volunteer dispatcher and a recipient of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, a 2012 program that allows people who came to the country illegally as children to receive deportation deferrals every two years. “It’s constant.”

Attendance at Catholic masses is down in the Fresno Diocese, which includes most of the San Joaquin Valley. Callers to the Valley Response hotline have reported that agricultural workers aren’t going to the citrus fields. They’ve heard reports of parents keeping their kids home from school, a trend documented in attendance figures in similar California communities. The flea market in Fresno has emptied out.

The Catholic masses began shrinking after immigration raids in Bakersfield in January, said Diocese of Fresno spokesman Chandler Marquez, and the attendance drop has been especially pronounced “in parishes that fall within the rural areas of our diocese.”

A key factor in getting people to self-deport is making it easy – in this case with an app in which people can report that they’re leaving the country. But just as important is making people in the country illegally worry about what happens if they stay.

That’s where rumors come in. Most are spread naturally, through honest but wary people who mistake a parked white truck for an immigration enforcement vehicle. Sometimes, Ojeda said, volunteers show up to a report of a raid, only to find the rumors were prank calls.

The effect is the same: Fear has a firm grip on immigrant communities in the Central Valley. Ojeda said some families have refused to leave the house for fear of apprehension by immigration enforcement agents.

The Valley Response volunteers have been collecting their stories. One elementary school student complained in class in February that he didn’t have food at home. Upon investigation, Ojeda said, Valley Response volunteers found that the adults in the family hadn’t left the house since the January immigration raid in Kern County in January and were asking neighbors to pick up their kids from school.

“We got them connected with services, we brought them food boxes, but how many other kids are out there (who) didn’t speak up,” she said.

Ojeda said she gave a know-your-rights lecture at a Catholic church in Merced and noticed all the empty pews, even after a Sunday mass. She said the priest told her that his attendance is down 60 percent-70 percent, especially after the Trump administration issued an executive order allowing immigration raids at places that had protected status under the Biden administration, such as churches, schools and hospitals.

Reports have spread among the volunteers of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement impersonators putting blue and red lights on their cars and pulling people over, something that is happening across the country.

“We asked the (Stanislaus County) sheriff what we should do,” Ojeda said. “He told us that you have to pull over if you see (blue and red) lights, but call 911 immediately, if the person comes to your window, call (police) dispatch immediately and ask for their name, we’ll let you know whether yes, indeed it’s an officer, or not.”

The Stanislaus Sheriff’s Office did not return calls and emails from CalMatters. The sheriff has previously insisted in a video message that his office does not enforce federal immigration law. While California’s sanctuary state law dictates what police are allowed to do regarding undocumented people, the law doesn’t have any bearing on the actions of federal agents.

White lies to mom

When Valley Watch Network director Lorena Lara lies to her mother, she tries to make the lies believable. Sure, it looks grim, she says, but it will get better quickly. They can’t keep targeting people, there’s not enough agents. And even if there were, this government doesn’t have a plan to get rid of all the estimated 11 million undocumented people in this country.

She doesn’t believe any of it. The situation is grim, it’s likely not going to get better for people here illegally. The Trump administration does indeed have a plan – it’s published on the White House website. It’s called “Protecting the American People Against Invasion.”

Lara’s mother is an undocumented immigrant who brought Lara to this country from Mexico. Lara lies to her because, she said, the truth would be worse.

“I tell her, well, things are ok right now,” she said from her office in Fresno. “I’m lying by omission.”

It’s a role reversal for Lara and her mother.

“I remember, growing up undocumented, after a certain point, my mom would say, you know, everything’s going to work out, it’ll be fine, this year something’s going to happen with our (immigration) status,” Lara said. “In 30-plus years, nothing has happened. Nothing is fine.

“And now we have this.”

She’s not telling her mother that reports of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement activity are piling up every day. A public website that collects tips about immigration raids publishes the alerts.

“Saw an officer wearing green outfit with a black vest that said ‘POLICE,’ “ read one alert.

“FBI and ICE were conducting raids in Madera. They seen them behind the Lowe’s. There are a lot of trucks,” read another.

“Black truck with tinted windows and Government plates 100 percent sure it was an undercover,” read a third.

In addition to the Central Valley, there are immigration response groups covering every county, from Los Angeles and the Inland Empire to the Bay Area and the far northern reaches of the state.

Along with answering the hotline phone, the groups are organizing meetings with public officials, holding know-your-rights seminars in immigrant-dominant communities and handing out small red cards that explain people’s rights in English and Spanish.

Their efforts to get a friendly ear with elected politicians — especially sheriffs — have been difficult. And even when they get a meeting, such as the one with the sheriff of Stanislaus County, the outcomes have been dissatisfying.

Law enforcement in the Central Valley seems divided on how to balance its need for cooperation from immigrant communities with the presence of immigration agents in their cities and counties — and staying within the bounds of California’s sanctuary state law.

In Amador County, a foothill community on the east side of the valley, the sheriff has proclaimed that he will deliberately violate the sanctuary law by contacting immigration authorities as soon as he has someone in custody whom he believes to be in the country illegally.

Farther south, at the Fresno Police Department, deputy chief Mark Salazar is working to reassure immigrants that they can safely share tips and communicate with officers.

“The police department tries to ensure it has cooperation from Spanish-only communities,” Salazar said. “DEA, (Homeland Security Investigations), all of them, they know we don’t mess with immigration. We don’t mess with Border Patrol, we’re not here to do raids. And so when your federal partners are doing things like that, then (the community) has to know, it’s not us.”

Salazar said the risk of violating that understanding is grave.

“We can’t break that, because if we break it, I think we’ll go back to having crimes not solved,” Salazar said. “We’ll go back to (the) community not trusting us.”

To Lara, dissolving that trust is part of the Trump administration plan.

“Oh, a thousand percent, a thousand percent that’s part of their goal,” Lara said.

Is it working?

“Yes.”

So she tells her mother things that aren’t exactly true, because it’s easier.

“It feels protective,” she said. “It feels like the right thing to do at the moment because I’m trying to maintain a fine line about, like, educating my mom and also having her not spiral and be in the depressive mode.”

In a small conference room in Fresno, she starts to cry.

“The thing between her and I is that it’s unspoken,” she said. “It’s like, Mom, things aren’t fine. They’re worse. What are you gonna do now? Do you wanna stay here, do you wanna go back? And that’s a question that I personally haven’t had the courage to ask her.”

A call comes in over the hotline.

“Hi, this is Elizabeth, I have not heard anything from my husband,” said the voice on the phone. “I’m really worried about the fact that it’s already another day. The lawyer didn’t call me back, is there anything I can do? Like, just anything that can give me just a little bit of hope?”

Inside the ICE detention center

Elizabeth Chavez sits at a four-seat table in the Golden State Annex, an immigration detention facility outside Bakersfield. Seated to her right is her husband, Alfredo Naranjo, 31, wearing a red jumpsuit. Their three children are in their van in the parking lot, waiting with Chavez’s parents.

“We tell the kids he’s working,” Chavez said.

The eldest child is 5. Chavez worries that he’s starting to catch on to their ruse.

Behind the fear in the Central Valley, behind the smaller classes and empty church pews, is the reality of immigration detention. Along with the alarms, false and real, about white trucks idling behind a grocery store, there are the people sitting in places like this, waiting to learn their fates.

At the detention center’s chain-link courtyard entrance on a chilly weekend morning in March, a dozen people mill around under loops of razor wire, waiting to be buzzed in by the Geo Group private prison company employee who runs the front door.

Each door in this facility is remotely operated by unseen guards. Families walk through the metal detector and follow a guard’s directions to the meeting area. Every 20 feet is another hallway, another door, another buzzer.

A final turn and the detention center’s day room comes into view, about 20 tables spread out over a space about the size of a large public high school cafeteria. At each table is a person in an orange or red jumpsuit, sitting in tiny clumps with the people who came to see them.

Chavez has dyed her hair a dark shade of purple. She is chatty, vivacious and afraid. Her husband is quiet. Together, they try to explain how he woke up on a Tuesday morning ready to take Chavez to a hospital visit and instead arrived here.

It all started with the cat.

As they walked out of their house in Patterson, Chavez saw a white minivan parked outside of their house. Her husband saw a small, white cat on the ground, putting its paws on the passenger side’s doors.

“He’s like, look, the cat is trying to get inside the van, and I was like yeah that’s funny,” said Chavez, 25. “It never crossed our heads that there was people in there.”

They sat down in their car. Then they saw the minivan’s driver activate red and blue lights, no siren.

“All of a sudden someone is knocking on the window, like banging on the window, hard,” Chavez said. “Then they said (Naranjo’s) name, which threw us off so much, it didn’t cross our minds that it was ICE.”

Naranjo stepped out of the car. Chavez said the agents started yelling, then put handcuffs on him. Chavez asked the agents for a warrant, and was told they didn’t need one.

The agents told Chavez that Mexico was “asking for” Naranjo. She asked the agent what Naranjo was accused of doing and the agent told her to ask her husband. Naranjo denied knowing what they were talking about.

The agents knew Chavez’s name. Even though she has legal status in this country, she was immediately terrified that they were about to take her, too.

Friends directed her to the Valley Response hotline, which connected her with an immigration attorney. So far, the government of Mexico has not provided any documentation indicating that it asked for Naranjo’s detention.

“We don’t know specifically why ICE may have been targeting him,” said attorney Katie Kavanagh of the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice. “It’s in line with what we’ve been seeing in enforcement actions throughout northern (and) Central California. We are seeing a lot of folks, even with little or no history of criminal arrests, being targeted simply because they have an immigration history.”

Naranjo said he has crossed the border only once, in 2016, and has no other criminal charges against him, but did once get a speeding ticket. CalMatters was unable to find a criminal history for him in Mexico or determine if one exists.

“When he was talking to the kids, he broke down,” Chavez said about Naranjo’s first call after he was detained. “The kids were asking him, like, when are you coming back? How are you doing your homework? Aren’t you coming home?”

The eldest child started to cry, she said, and her middle daughter was starting to sniffle when she decided to lie. For now, the kids still believe he’s at work.

Now, Chavez worries Naranjo’s not eating. Sometimes, he told her, the meal times get pushed back by several hours, and if you miss it, you’ll stay hungry until the next one. But mostly, he tries to assure her that he’s fine and all of this will seem like a bad dream.

“Of course he’s gonna say everything’s OK, because he doesn’t want me to worry about it,” Chavez said. “But I just don’t really know if he’s OK.”

Kavanagh, the attorney who helped with the immediate response, is unable to take on their case. For now, they’re on their own.

So Chavez makes these weekly pilgrimages down to Bakersfield, a three-hour drive each way. Out in the parking lot, the kids don’t know their father is just a few hundred feet away.

Past the parking lot is State Route 99, the main north-south artery connecting the Central Valley, where Valley Response volunteers sometimes chase white trucks.

Further east, just visible on a clear day, is the Sierra Nevada mountain range, blue and snow capped and still, and beyond that an apartment complex in Denver and a a federal courthouse in Chicago and a car wash in Philadelphia where the largest deportation program in American history is just getting started.

spot_img

Trump’s defiance of the Supreme Court: A challenge to the rule of law—but not yet contempt?

by Marvin Ramírez and El Reportero staff

In an unprecedented move that has sparked outrage among legal scholars and civil rights advocates, the Trump administration has openly refused to comply with a U.S. Supreme Court order to facilitate the return of Kilmar Armando Abrego García, a Salvadoran man wrongfully deported from Maryland to El Salvador.

At first glance, this might appear to be a textbook case of contempt of court. A man who was legally residing in the U.S., who had a standing immigration court order protecting him from deportation, was forcibly removed—and now the government refuses to bring him back, even after the Supreme Court stepped in. But the reality is far more complex. And while morally alarming, the legal system’s response may not involve the punishment many are demanding.

The legal and moral crisis

Abrego García’s case is undeniably tragic. According to immigration records and a 2019 ruling by an immigration judge, he was not only eligible to stay in the U.S. but had been granted protection from removal. Nonetheless, he was deported in March 2025, an act the government has since admitted was done in error.

The courts moved swiftly. A federal district judge in Maryland ruled that the deportation was unlawful and ordered the government to bring Abrego García back. The Supreme Court echoed this in a 9–0 decision that instructed the government to “facilitate” his return—though it stopped short of spelling out precisely how that should be done.

What followed was an astonishing rebuke from the executive branch. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt claimed the judiciary had overstepped its authority and that the administration had no obligation to charter planes or negotiate with foreign governments under judicial order. The State Department also cited diplomatic complexities with El Salvador and noted that President Nayib Bukele’s administration had refused to cooperate.

Why contempt of court isn’t so simple

Many are now asking: if a U.S. citizen refused to obey a Supreme Court order, wouldn’t they face contempt charges? So why not President Trump?

The answer lies in the constitutional architecture of the U.S. government.

The Supreme Court, though the highest legal authority in the land, does not have its own enforcement arm. It relies on the Executive Branch—the very body defying it—for implementation. The Marshal of the Supreme Court isn’t going to march into the Oval Office and serve a contempt notice to the President. That’s not how American governance works.

Moreover, the Court’s language was deliberately cautious. By saying the U.S. must “facilitate” the return of Abrego García, the Justices left some interpretive wiggle room. This ambiguity could shield the administration from a technical finding of contempt. The government’s argument is essentially that it has tried to facilitate the return but is blocked by a sovereign foreign nation that refuses to cooperate.

In legal terms, contempt typically requires a willful failure to comply with a clear and specific court order. If the order is ambiguous or compliance is arguably impossible due to third-party actions—such as a refusal from a foreign government—it becomes exceedingly difficult to prove contempt in a court of law.

In short: while the administration’s actions may defy the spirit of the law, it may not be violating the letter of it—at least not in a way the courts are equipped to punish.

A constitutional crisis—without a legal remedy?

This situation isn’t just about Abrego García. It raises deeply uncomfortable questions about the limits of judicial authority and the potential for executive overreach in the modern presidency.

We’ve never seen a president flatly refuse to abide by a Supreme Court directive. Even Richard Nixon, under immense pressure during Watergate, complied with a court order to turn over the White House tapes. But the current refusal to comply, dressed up in legal ambiguity and political defiance, is being framed by the administration as a matter of executive discretion in foreign policy.

That framing is dangerous.

It implies that so long as the President cloaks his actions in the language of diplomacy or national security, he can effectively neuter the Court’s authority. If allowed to stand, this precedent could render judicial oversight irrelevant in future disputes involving immigration, human rights, or executive misconduct.

Political consequences in place of legal ones

Since the Court is unlikely to pursue contempt charges against a sitting president—and since such an effort would almost certainly fail without enforcement powers—the remaining checks must come from Congress and the people.

Already, Democratic lawmakers are mobilizing. Senator Chris Van Hollen has announced plans to travel to El Salvador to pressure President Bukele directly. Others are calling for formal censure or even impeachment proceedings, though the political appetite for such action remains uncertain.

It’s clear that this is not merely a bureaucratic mishap. It is a test of whether the United States still functions under the rule of law—or whether our constitutional safeguards are only as strong as the people in power are willing to honor them.

A Slippery slope

While Trump may not be held in contempt today, the erosion of legal norms is a slow process. If a Supreme Court order can be disregarded by claiming logistical difficulties or diplomatic interference, future presidents will take note. The precedent set here may not lead to immediate collapse, but it contributes to the steady hollowing-out of judicial authority.

And in that vacuum, power accrues elsewhere—to the Executive Branch, to strongman politics, to the idea that might makes right.

That is why this case matters—not only for Kilmar Armando Abrego García, whose life remains in limbo, but for every American who depends on a fair and functioning legal system.

Because in the end, the true danger isn’t that Trump won’t be held in contempt of court.

It’s that he doesn’t have to be.

spot_img

Musical Tribute to Selena Held

by Magdy Zara

To commemorate the musical legacy of the queen of Tex-Mex, a musical tribute has been organized for Selena, who passed away on March 31, 1995.

On this day, there will be an Easter egg hunt and Easter basket giveaways.

As you may recall, Selena made history in 1994 by becoming the first woman in Tejano music to win a Grammy. Her style blended mariachi, cumbia, polka, and waltz, characteristic of Tex-Mex. With her success, she became one of the biggest stars in Spanish-language music and earned a star on the Walk of Fame in 2017.

If you have singing talent and would like to participate by singing or dancing, you can join the list of those who will be paying tribute to Selena that day by calling 831-210-5215.

The event is on April 20th, starting at 11 a.m., at 925 N Sanborn Rd, Salinas. Admission is free.

Agrupación Folklórica Quetzalén presents its 2025 season

The Quetzalén community folk dance group is preparing its 2025 Tardeada Folklórica, where in addition to enjoying music and dancing, you can enjoy traditional Mexican food, desserts, an artisan market, raffles, family activities, live entertainment, and more.

The funds raised will help purchase costumes for its summer concert, “Así Danzan Los Niños,” and support its general operations.

Grupo Folklórico Quetzalén is a Mexican folk dance ensemble from Sonoma Valley, California. It was founded in 2008 as a project of Sonoma Valley High School seniors. This evening bash will be held this Sunday, April 20, from 2 p.m. to 8 p.m., at El Verano Elementary School (Sonoma Valley), located at 18606 Riverside Dr. Sonoma.

SFMOMA Hosts Art Bash

The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art is preparing one of the most anticipated evenings in the Bay Area, its signature benefit, which for one night transforms the museum into an immersive space of creativity and community.

The evening begins with cocktails and a dinner designed by Firelei Báez, who will transform the 7th floor galleries into a primeval forest of mystery and wonder. Guests will enter an unparalleled immersive space. During dinner, they will participate in a dynamic live auction led by Sotheby’s auctioneer Phyllis Kao.

In the evening, attendees can join the museum-wide party, which will feature guest artists Masako Miki and Jeffrey Sincich.

Additionally, live musical performances by Zack Fox, Martin Luther and Band, DJ Shortkut, DJ Lady Ryan, and more will be featured, in collaboration with the Stern Grove Festival.

Art Bash raises more than $2 million annually to further SFMOMA’s mission of making art accessible to all. Every admission helps fund the museum’s educational and family programs, as well as community engagement events.

This art bash will be next Wednesday, April 23, 2025, from 6 p.m. to 1 a.m. It is exclusive to those 21 and over. The San Francisco Museum of Art is located at 151 Third St., San Francisco.

spot_img