Monday, August 31, 2026
Home Blog Page 601

Are you about to lose your home? Then you must read this article to save it

­by Marvin J. Ramirez

­Marvin  J. RamírezMarv­in J. Ramírez­­

Despite of news media keep saying that thing are getting better and the economy is going on the right direction, million of people continue fighting for their right to keep their homes banksters, while the court continue ruling against home owners, with some excemptions. El Reportero brings you the following article gathered online for the benefit our readers.

In Landmark National Bank v. Kesler (full ruling), 2009 Kan. LEXIS 834, the Kansas Supreme Court held that a nominee company called MERS has no right or standing to bring an action for foreclosure. MERS is an acronym for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, a private company that registers mortgages electronically and tracks changes in ownership.

The significance of the holding is that if MERS has no standing to foreclose, then nobody has standing to foreclose – on 60 million mortgages.Ellen BrownAuthor, Attorney by online wire services Here it is. On August 28, 2009 the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas rendered an opinion based calmly on existing law and relentlessly applying it to the chagrin of all participants in the securitization scheme.

MERS was the appellant seeking to invoke due process rights which it said were violated when they failed to get notice of the fact that their “interest” was being wiped out. The Court said simply that MERS — or any nominee” didn’t have any interest and proves its point by reference to simple statements in the documents and the simplest of laws and interpretation of the role of MERS and the requirements of recordation. The splitting of the note and mortgage creates an immediate and fatal flaw in title.

Title carriers take notice — all previous foreclosures falling within the scope of this opinion are subject to either compensation to the homeowner or reinstatement of the homeowner as possessor and owner of the home, or both. The implications of this ruling cannot be overstated — but neither should it be overused.

This is one state, but it is likely to serve as the basis for most appellate opinions rendered on securitized loans. The tide has turned.

The moral of the story is that those encumbrances (mortgages) don’t exist in most cases, the foreclosures were all fatally flawed, the people who have been chased out of their homes, still own those homes, and the parties seeking to enforce the note can do so only as unsecured creditors and only if they prove that they lent the money that funded the loan and only if they are willing to be subject to counterclaims, cross claims, affirmative defenses and defenses of the borrower relating to predatory lending, appraisal fraud, securities fraud, rescission under all available theories of law, damages, treble damages, punitive damages, exemplary damages and consequential economic damages.

This is the start of what will be a long line of cases running through state courts and Federal Courts finding that MERS, the whole “Nominee” business plan, assignments from those without power to assign, splitting the note and mortgage ­making the mortgage unenforceable, necessary and indispensable parties, vacating judgments procured by fraud, and all the other basic black letter law flaws in the securitization of loans are exposed for what they are — a scheme that would and did wreak havoc on the notice and recording requirements of each and every state, a scheme whose execution created fatal flaws in title, and the intent to buy-pass the basic requirements of law in effect since at least the 17th century.

This case must be read multiple times and very carefully as it contains a succinct discussion of the decisions in other states. I will be referring to this case and analyzing it in the days ahead for our blog readers and for my clients who have retained me as an expert witness. I agree with every word in this opinion — a rarity and I am relying on it as corroboration for all my prior writing and expert opinions rendered in all cases across the country.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

spot_img

Laser therapy can greatly reduce disconfort, stains on the skin

by the Universidad of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Michigan.— After 56 years of discomfort, embarrassment, and even pain, Maureen Dillon was finally able to go out in public with only one layer of makeup on. She felt beautiful for the first time since adolescence. She jumped in a pool without worrying about her makeup washing off and revealing a strawberry-colored cheek and nose.

Dillon had lived with port wine stains since birth, and they became darker and brought more distress as the years went on.

After dealing with blood vessel clusters and papules, swelling and infections, Dillon’s family doctor sent her to see Jeffrey Orringer, M.D., director of the Cosmetic Dermatology and Laser Center at the University of Michigan Health System. Orringer used lasers that, over eight treatments, removed Dillon’s port wine stains.

Three of every 1,000 children born has a port wine stain, which is made famup of numerous dilated vessels in a localized part of the skin. They can occur anywhere on the body, but most laser treatment patients have port wine stains on the face or neck.

“There are lots of theories about why port wine stains develop, but the truth is that no one really knows why a child is born with a port wine stain,” Orringer says.

Even though he cannot explain why Dillon or anyone else gets the vascular birthmark, he has good odds of making them better with the laser therapy: 75 percent to 80 percent of patients have their port wine stain lighteBrattned by at least 50 percent, and the mark disappears completely in 15 percent to 20 percent of patients.

“When this type of laser therapy is performed by an experienced physician, risks are really very low,” Orringer says. The combination of state-of-the-art lasers with experienced anesthesia doctors makes the treatments essentially pain-free for children undergoing the procedure, he added. Adults generally tolerate the treatments in the clinic setting without the need for anesthesia.

Treatments typically take just a few minutes. The patient reclines in a chair, wearing goggles to protect the eyes, while the doctor­uses the laser in small circles to reach the entire surface of the port wine stain. Bruising occurs for up to two days after each treatment. Dillon said the look reminded her of black currant jelly. When the bruising wears off, the strawberry-colored port wine stain is not there either.

“It was just amazing,” Dillon said. She no longer requires the antibiotics or prednisone that she needed for infections and swelling from the birthmark.

Orringer recommends that those with port wine stains seek treatment early in life as they normally worsen over time; however, he has also treated older patients with great results.

spot_img

CODEPINK speaks out, “Obama end Afghan War”

by Chanaye J. Thomas

CODEPINK protest during Obama’s vist to SF.: (photo by Chanaye J. Thomas)CODEPINK protest during Obama’s vist to SF. (photo by Chanaye J. Thomas)

The UK Guardian, and countless other news sources recently reported that President Barack Obama is quietly deploying an extra 13,000 troops to Afghanistan, an unannounced move that is separate from a request by a U.S. commander for even more reinforcements.

In San Francisco a group of protesters, including the organization CODEPINK, held a demonstration against Obama’s escalating of the war at Union Square, across from where the President was to speak at an Organizing for America fundraiser.

­“Right now we have a CODEPINKer who is inside and she will be presenting Obama with a stack of petitions to have a responsible withdraw plan and an exit strategy to get out of Iraq, as well as reports of her recent trip to Afghanistan,” said Rae Abileah of CODEPINK.

“It’s an appeal to the humanity of these leaders to say what for? Why are we attacking innocent civilians?”

Around 5:30 p.m. on Oct. 15, CODEPINK climbed to the roof of the Cheesecake Factory, directly above the Macy’s building in Union Square San Francisco to reveal a 50ft banner across from where the event was being held and where Obama was scheduled to appear.

While still on the roof and as the banner which read “Obama end Afghan War” had been almost completely revealed, the loyal security guards showed up to bring it down before the police intervened. The police took the names of two of CODEPINK members and told them “not to worry about it,” said Marina, a CODEPINK member.

According to news reports, they 13,000 extra troop acre composed of mainly engineers, medical staff, intelligence officers and military police. About 3,000 of them are specialists in explosives, who are being sent to try to fght the growing fatality rate from roadside bombs. “Last week Obama decided to send 13,000 more troops to Afghanistan.

That’s not a noble peace qualifier, that’s not what we think a real peace president would do, so we want to help support the president do what he was elected to do” said Rae.

When El Reportero asked Rae if she had any last comments she said, ”We are all out here because President Obama made a lot of promises and now we need to remind him to fulfi ll them, hopefully he’ll take our messages to heart, but I’ll believe it when I see it.”

CODEPINK is a women-initiated grassroots peace and social justice movement. ­They direct their energy on working to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, stopping new wars, and redirecting U.S. resources into health care, education, green jobs and other life-affirming activities.

 

­

spot_img

Cuba won’t let blogger to to U.S. to receive award

by the El reportero’s news services

Yoani SánchezYoani Sánchez

HAVANA — A Cuban blogger who has become an international sensation for offering frank criticism of her country’s communist system said she was denied government permission Monday to travel to New York to receive a top journalism prize.

Yoani Sánchez had hoped to go to Columbia University for a Wednesday ceremony to receive her María Moors Cabot Prize, the oldest international award in journalism.

“Immigration just confirmed that I remain prohibited from leaving the country,” she posted on her “Generation Y” blog.

There was no confirmation from the government, but Cuban authorities almost never comment on such matters.

Sánchez’s husband, Reynaldo Escobar, who uses his own blog to provide searing criticism of everyday life in Cuba, said in a phone interview that his wife spent the morning discussing her travel request with immigration offi cials, then posted word of the denial.

In May, Cuban authorities denied Sánchez permission to fl y to Madrid to accept the Ortega y Gasset Prize in digital journalism for creating Generation Y, which gets more than 1 million hits a month. Around the same time, Time magazine deemed Sánchez one of the world’s 100 most infl uential people.

Indigenous groups across the region flex their muscles

Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa and assorted cabinet ministers received more than 30 indigenous leaders in the presidential palace Carondelet this week in an effort to pre-empt an escalation in protests against the new Water Law and the government’s mining plans.

Correa’s decision to give the indigenous a hearing shows he is acutely aware of how the Peruvian government’s mishandling of protests in the Amazon led to bloody clashes with security forces in June.

Peru’s President Alan García failed to consult the indigenous about development plans in the area: a commission belatedly travelled to Bagua this week to assess the causes of the protest.

How different would a Piñera government be?

The opinion polls for Chile’s presidential election still point to a decisive, second-round run-off between a rightwing billionaire, Sebastián Piñera from the Alianza por el Cambio, and Eduardo Frei, from the ruling Concertación, on January 17.

The first round on 13 December is likely, according to the opinion polls, to knock out Marco Enríquez Ominami, an independent socialist and Jorge Arrate, a radical leftwinger. Here we look at how different a Piñera government might be from the Concertación administrations of the past 20 years.

Hondurans agree on constitution; no deal on Zelaya

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras — Honduras’ opposing factions agreed Tuesday on nearly every point of a pact to end the political crisis except the central issue: ousted President Manuel Zelaya’s return to the presidency.

Negotiators said Zelaya’s camp has promised that if he returns to power, he will drop his efforts to change the Honduran constitution, an initiative that led to his June 28 ouster.

Juan Barahona, a Zelaya supporter who has led street protests against the coup, walked out of the talks Tuesday in protest of the agreement on the constitution. He vowed to continue fighting for a new constitution on his own even if Zelaya is restored to offi­ce.

Critics say Zelaya was seeking to extend his time in office by removing a constitutional ban on presidential re-election, as his ally Hugo Chavez has done in Venezuela. Zelaya denied that was his intention, but soldiers fl ew him into exile at gunpoint after he ignored court orders to drop a referendum to ask Hondurans if they wanted an assembly to rewrite the constitution.

Zelaya sneaked back into Honduras on Sept. 21 and is holed up at the Brazilian Embassy. The United States and other countries have suspended aid to the Central American country to pressure the interim government to restore Zelaya.

(AP and Latin News contributed to the report.)

spot_img

Latino groups’s quest: oust Dobbs from CNN

by Erick Galindo

Twice now, Lou Dobbs has mentioned: Roberto Lovato on his “Lou Dobbs Tonight” program carried by CNN. Lovato is an investigative reporter and former community organizer. On the aig Dobbs labeled him a ‘’flea” and a “bozo.”

Dobbs annoyance stems from the fact that Lovato is part of a national movement to get the controversial commentator dropped from CNN. Lovato’s group, Basta Dobbs, is conducting one of three major campaigns tar geting the conservative anchor.

Drop Dobbs Now and Democracia Ahora’s campargn entitled “Enough is Enough!” are the others.

“At some point the :Latino community had to do something to push back against the tide of hatred that seals the cup and pocketbook of Lou Dobbs and CNN’” Lovato told Weekly Report.

The majority of Dobbs’ shows deal with immigration, a problem Lovato says, “has the potential to change the course of American history.” In 140 broadcast hours this year from Jan. 1 through July 23, “Lou Dobbs Tonight” devoted 77—more than half—to the topic of immigration.

Dobbs has claimed that immigrants carry diseases across the border, are criminals and steal jobs from U.S. workers as pan of a major Mexican conspiracy to re-conquer the Southwest as part of the fabled Aztlan. In 2007 he falsely related a substantial rise in leprosy cases to immigrant flow across the border.

Lovato gives the CNN show credit for one positive advance in the Hispanic community: Dobbs’ attacks have brought the community to its feet, he says. They have facilitated the movement, seriously damaged his credibility with the public, and put in question CNN’s impartial image as “the most trusted name in news.~

This year Dobbs aired a piece questioning the citizenship of President Barack Obama even as CNN itself had already discredited the so-called “birthers” movement.

In August, he affiliated himself with the Federation for American Immigration Reform, an anti-immigrant special interest group, prompting Media Matters President Eric Burns to issue an open letter to CNN Vice President Jonathan Klein.

“Mr. Dobbs represents an ongoing threat to CNN’s credibility as a serious news organization’ in no small part because of his polemical coverage of immigration issues and his continued Use of his CNN show to lend prominence to groups such as FAIR,” wrote Burns.

But according to Lovato, Dobbs threatens more than his reputation. “I know the kind of dangerous threat represented by CNN and Lou Dobbs.” Lavato said. “He is willing to draw on some of the famed gutters of imagery and language that perpetuate racism and hate and somehow call it news.”

CNN has defended Dobbs opinions and he has repeatedly defended his right to be on the air and state his partiality. Yet, his diatribes have contributed to a rise in hate crimes in the community~ according to a report by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

“This kind of really vile propaganda begins in hate groups’ makes its way out into the larger anti-immigration movement’ and’ before you know it, winds up in places like ‘Lou Dobbs Tonightt on CNN,” said Mark Potok’ director of the Intelligence Project. “This country needs a robust debate on immigration, but it does not need a debate based on racist allegations and bogus conspiracy theories.”

Lovato said the movement is making great strides and has grown by the tens of thousands in the past few weeks alone, giving him optimism to complete the mission.

“What is happening now is a national and multi-prong, multi-focused effort and that’s something they have never had to face,” he said. “It’s something bigger they didn’t think the community capable of ever really taking on. It’s actually really exciting that way.”

Lovato said the movement has also made progress at CNN and some inside the network have privately admitted ­that there is pressure. The fact that extreme caricature zealots, like FOX’s Glenn Beck, continue to lose sponsors is also something that concerns the network.

Dobbs has begun to drop in the ratings which could be why he chose to acknowledge Lovato on the air and invite him to come on “Lou Dobbs Tonight” to debate immigration: a move that could re-energize Dobbs’ ratings. But Lovato and other leaders of the movement say they are past the stage of trying to debate Dobbs.

“At this point we are going over his head,” Lovato said. “We’re talking to his bosses. CNN tells us that it is feeling the massive attack, I mean, executives are seeing the national growing pressure from Latinos throughout the United States. Hispanic Link.

spot_img

Signs that things are getting out of control

by José de la Isla

HOUSTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has attracted considerable public attention by bringing up the specter of hateful political speech, making the historical connection to violence in the San Francisco community she represents in Congress.

She did so by referring to the killings 31 years ago of Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk in that city at the hands of former Board of Supervisors member Dan White.

She brought it up because now is looking a lot like then.

In ’78 the Board was split 6-5 over pro-growth, pro-neighborhood positions when White resigned. Then he wanted his job back. Moscone, a liberal, would make the decision about conservative White’s political future.

White was the lone vote opposing San Francisco’s landmark gay rights ordinance which had passed that year. Time magazine referred to Milk as “the first openly gay man elected to any substantial political office in the history of the planet.” White and Milk had previously sparred over a group home that Milk favored in White’s district.

Ten days before White killed Moscone and Milk, California Congressman Leo Ryan, while on a fact-finding mission to Jonestown, Guyana, was murdered by cult members of San Francisco-based People’s Temple, led by Jim Jones. Ryan was a critic of Scientology, Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church and destructive cults, religious groups that cause harm to their own members and others. Nearly a thousand people committed mass suicide or were murdered in Guyana.

Jonestown was the largest loss of U.S. civilian lives in a non-natural disaster up to that time. Ryan became the only congressman ever murdered in the line of duty.

The moral lessons from the two incidents did not stay on the surface like a good tattoo. Instead, they faded away.

November 1978 was the perfect storm of political issues, polarized world views and hysteria from Armageddon-preaching pulpits.

Together they created a fever that preys on people who can barely hang on, or whose neuroses takes the form of an egomaniacal heroism.

The pulpit calls, the thin philosophies and fear-evoking, end-of-life-as-we-know-it ideologies provide the atmospherics that give license to individuals on the brink of committing some out-of-bounds act of defiance. You can feel the seething.

Exaggerated, you say? It’s really not that bad right now? Oh?

The classic example about lynch-mob blinded rage is found in Dallas, 1963. In his book Death of A President, William Manchester noted that 110 murders had occurred there the year before President Kennedy was killed. The city had led the nation in homicides. Through his meticulous research, Manchester came to believe that the political climate there had been a factor in Kennedy’s death.

On hearing the news that the President had been killed, a fourth-grade class in a wealthy Dallas suburb burst into applause. As a teenager in Houston, I witnessed

a crowd do the same. A docent at the Texas Book Depository Museum told me five years ago he understood Dan Rather had reported something similar.

The infraworld — Jonestown and 110 murders in Dallas — are underlying signs that things are getting out of control.

Another is the license many people and their political leaders are taking to permit harm to come to others, deny undocumented immigrants drivers licenses, restrict places they can live, encouraging family disunification, permitting dragnets and prohibiting access to schooling. These are signs of an unnatural national coarseness. All are about the moral code breaking down and decency escaping the body politic.

Yet, one demonstration sign the mob holds up is true, however: “They Are Taking Our Country Away!”

­The ones who seethe with anger, demean the presidency, talk smack, believe guns are good and follow slogans like sheep are taking good parts of our country away and making it look like a destructive cult.

[José de la Isla’s latest digital book, sponsored by The Ford Foundation, is available free at www.DayNightLifeDeathHope.com. He writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service and is author of The Rise of Hispanic Political Power (2003). E-mail him at joseisla3@yahoo.com.] ©2009

spot_img

There is a plan to exterminate us in mass

by Marvin J. Ramirez

­Marvin  J. RamírezMarv­in J. Ramírez­­

A few months ago, headlines hit the sky with the news that Obama’s science czar considered forced abortions, sterilization as population growth solutions.

According to news reports, John Holdren, director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, considered compulsory abortions and other Draconian measures to shrink the human population in a 1977 science textbook.

During the last year, El Reportero has received a considerable number of links to blogs that describe how the U.S. government is following the agenda of the banking elite to reduce the population, not only in the U.S., but in the rest of the world.

According to a FoxNews article, President Obama’s “science czar,” Paul Holdren, once floated the idea of forced abortions, “compulsory sterilization,” and the creation of a “Planetary Regime” that would oversee human population levels and control all natural resources as a means of protecting the planet — controversial ideas his critics say should have been brought up in his Senate confirmation hearings.

The article proceeded: Holdren, who has degrees from MIT and Stanford and headed a science policy program at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government for the past 13 years, won the unanimous approval of the Senate as the president’s chief science adviser.

He was confirmed with little fanfare on March 19 as director of the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy, a 50-person directorate that advises the president on scientific affairs, focusing on energy independence and global warming.

But many of Holdren’s radical ideas on population control were not brought up at his confirmation hearings; it appears that the senators who scrutinized him had no knowledge of the contents of a textbook he co-authored in 1977, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” a copy of which was obtained by FOXNews.com.

The three authors of the 1,000-page book, summarize their guiding principle in a single sentence, which advocate totalitarian measures: “To provide a high quality of life for all, there must be fewer people.”

Holdren and the Ehrlichs, according to the article, offer ideas for “coercive,” ­“involuntary fertility control,” including “a program of sterilizing women after their second or third child,” which doctors would be expected to do right after a woman gives birth.

The Swine Flu pandemic, dear readers, did not appear as an accident. It was a man-made disease created for human extermination.

spot_img

Mexican journalist receives prestigious award

by the University of Michigan

Lydia CachoLydia Cacho

In recognition of mexican journalist Lydia Cacho’s determination to defend powerless children and women from violence and exploitation, and to insist on her right and responsibility to write the truth, Cacho will be presented with the U-M Wallenberg Medal at 7:30 p.m. Thursday in Rackham Auditorium. After receiving the medal, she will deliver the Wallenberg Lecture.

­Lydia Cacho Ribeiro, a journalist, feminist and human rights activist, uncovered the most sordid secret of Cancún, the idyllic vacation resort, when she denounced a child prostitution and traffi cking ring hidden in luxury hotels that was organized by businessmen and protected by politicians and thugs.

Cacho’s book “The Demons of Eden” (2005), which captured national and international attention, details the role of the businessman Kamel Nacif Borge, known as the “King of Denim,” in protecting Jean Succar Kuri, an associate and hotel owner implicated in the operation of a child prostitution and traffi cking ring. The book brought nationwide attention to systemic corruption involving powerful business interests, politicians, law enforcement and judges.

After publication of her book, Cacho was arrested, beaten and threatened with rape. Taped conversations between the governor of the state of Puebla and Nacif Borge, in which they discussed plans for her detention, including the threat of rape, were subsequently published in the press, causing national outrage.

Cacho became the first woman in Mexico to file a federal lawsuit against government and judicial offi cials for corruption. By a narrow vote, the Mexican Supreme Court rejected the report of its own commission and dismissed her case, resulting in a renewed public outcry. The perpetrators in turn accused her of defamation, but the Mexican Supreme Court ruled that the content of her book was true.

According to International PEN and Reporters Without Borders, Mexico is the most dangerous country in the Americas for journalists and writers. Since 2000, 55 ­journalists have been killed and eight disappeared. Many have been forced into exile. Despite ongoing threats to her life and harassment, Cacho remains a determined and outspoken journalist and activist. She directs CIAM, a community-based organization in Cancún that works to bring attention to sexual exploitation and violence against women and children, and aid to its victims.

Cacho has received wide recognition for her work as a humanitarian and a journalist, including the Amnesty International Ginetta Sagan Award for Women and Children’s Rights in 2007 and the UNESCO/Guillermo Cano Freedom of Expression Award in 2008.

The Raoul Wallenberg Endowment, established in 1985, recognizes those whose courageous actions call to mind Wallenberg’s extraordinary accomplishments and values. A 1935 graduate of the U-M College of Architecture, Wallenberg, as a Swedish diplomat, saved the lives of tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews near the end of World War II.

­

spot_img

Unity behind de facto government cracks

­by the El Reportero’s news services

Manuel ZelayaManuel Zelaya

The ousted president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, ­remains holed up in the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa, 10 days after his unexpected return to the country. Talks with the de facto president, Roberto Micheletti, have not materialized.

There are clear signs, however, that the broad spectrum of political and business leaders that backed the June 28 coup is withdrawing its unconditional support of Micheletti.

Not only is there a sense that he overstepped the mark this week by suspending civil liberties for 45 days, ostensibly in response to Zelaya’s ill-judged calls for insurrection, but there is also impatience with his obduracy. The Church, business sectors and the armed forces are now all involved in searching for a resolution to the crisis

 

spot_img

Latinos, other members of Congress jump into Honduras’ fracas

by Erick Galindo & Camila Rodríguez Campo

Nearly 350 hotel workers and housekeepers were joined by prominent women leaders, students, community and clergy leaders on an all-day Bay area tour from Santa Clara Hyatt Regency San Francisco: to Grand Hyatt San Francisco, carrying the “Hope Quilt” in its 2nd leg in the 7-city “Hope for Housekeepers” National Tour. (PHOTO COURTESY BY UNITE HERE)Nearly 350 hotel workers and housekeepers were joined by prominent women leaders, students, community and clergy leaders on an all-day Bay area tour from Santa Clara Hyatt Regency San Francisco to Grand Hyatt San Francisco, carrying the “Hope Quilt” in its 2nd leg in the 7-city “Hope for Housekeepers” National Tour. (PHOTO COURTESY BY UNITE HERE)

Tensions continue to mount in the Americas with the tumultuous political climate of Honduras. Ousted Presiden­t Manuel Zelaya’s return to his country under the protection of the 13raizilian Embassy h­as not only escalated the risk of violence but it has raised the stakes in U.S. chambers.

The rift between Republicans, who support conservative coup-installed president Roberto Micheletti, and Democrats, who defend democratically elected populist Zelaya, is underpinned by a confrontation between Senators John Kerry (D-Mass.) and Jim DeMint (R-S.C.).

Kerryblocked U.S. StateDepartmentfunding for DeMint’s Oct. 3 trip to Honduras.

The senator’s aides had called the visit a “factfinding” trip, but also told The New York Times that the senator was going to Honduras to encourage the coup government to “resist” U.S. government pressure.

Three other Republican members of Congress accompanied DeMint, and three more, all Cuban Americans, are scheduled to travel there Oct. 5.

Obama Administration policy calls for reinstatement of Zelaya, although U.S. officials stated in the last Organization of Americas meeting that the way Zelaya returned to his own country was irresponsible and foolish. They stressed the importance of recreating a peaceful democratic environment.

Six House members sent a letter to the president of the Honduran Congress on Oct. 3 clarifying that the GOP legislators’ view did not reflect that of the U.S. Congress as a whole, which includes the all-Democrat, 24member Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Arizona’s Raul Grijalva joined 15 other House members in a letter urging Obama to take stronger action against the coup regime.

Despite the U.S. posture and lack of international support for Honduras’ de-facto government, DeMint acquired logistical support for his trip through the U.S. Department of Defense.

The trio of Cuban-American congressional members represent Florida districts.

The Diaz-Balart brothers, Lincoln and Mario, and lleana Ros-Lehtinen, all Republicans, made arrangements to travel to Honduras Oct. 5 to explore whether current U.S. policy is “undermining the democratic aspirations of the Honduran people and vital U.S. national security and commercial interests,” as Ros-Lehtinen framed it.

Zelaya was seized and spirited out of the country on June 28 for what his foes called constitutional violations. Now his associates are attacking Micheletti for suspending constitutional rights. His regime has already tear~ gassed the Brazil Embassy where Zelaya has taken refuge.

The coup government recently ordered the closure of media outlets, including Radio Globo, one of that country’s largest broadcasters. Responding to world reaction, coup leaders later lifted sanctions.

Ros-Lebtinen has remained adamant of her support of Micheletti.

“I am traveling to Honduras to conduct my own assessment of the situation on the ground and the state of U.S. interests in light of the U.S.’s misguided Zelaya-focused approach,” she said.

The de-facto government

gave Brazil a ten-day ultimatum either to give political asylum to Zelaya or to turn him in to the Honduran authorities to keep its diplomatic status. Brazil responded by warning ­Honduras that invading the Brazilian Embassy would be a major violation of international law.

Ros-Lebtenin explained her visit, “I wish to ensure that the Honduran people and democratic constitutional government have the opportunity to tell their side of the story, given that the international community has ignored the will of the Honduran people throughout this process.”

Neither her fact-finding mission nor those of the Díaz-Balarts included a meeting with Zelaya, Ros-Lebtinen communications director Alex Cruz, traveling with her, told Weekly Report. “It’s not part of our agenda.” Hispanic Link.

 

­

spot_img