Tuesday, November 26, 2024
Home Blog Page 577

Bush’s mortgage plan is a laugh at the people

by Marvin J Ramire­z

Marvin RamirezMarvin Ramirez

Even though this is his last term, President Bush continues playing games with the people.

He works for the bankers who own this nation. Don’t forget that they print the money, not the government, since the Federal Reserve is a private corporation and which keeps a two-party system form of government that allows only a few allied to own the airwaves (CBS, ABC, Univision, Telemundo, etc) to tell us ­the story they wants us to hear.

With his speech showing that he is trying to help homeowners on the verge of foreclosure, he is now coming up with a solution, after he said, talked to the bankers, his real bosses.

President Bush outlined a plan which will help strapped homeowners save their homes, right!

But minutes after he launch his plan in the media, callers were told to wait until a counselor could answer their questions, according to an Associated Press news report.

“Only a fraction of the homeowners who face huge jumps in their mortgage payments appear likely to be helped by the plan, negotiated by the Bush administration, to freeze the low introductory rates on their subprime loans for five years. After that, they could be in the same position again,” says the article.

But what people don’t know is that they – the home owners – really don’t owe anything in their homes, because at the time they signed the promissory note, the house was paid off with it. All this is part of the banking fraud perpetrated on the people.

As an anonymous person online asks: What did my local bank lend me?

Answer: The real fact of the matter is that the banker deposited your loan papers (as money) into the bank, and then lent you the same value of your asset (credit application, promissory note, mortgage note) by simply depositing your asset and then lend you the same value of your loan papers. But only banks are allowed to do that. Is what  some call, creating instant money.

Mr. Bush knows that, and he knows that the housing prices you see escalating so fast, to the point that make people to invest the last penny  in their piggy bank, with hopes of making a fortune after refinancing it two years later, it was infl ated by the ­appraisers, according to recent news reports. So, the price is not real.

And the plan drafted by the Bush administration will work only for those privilege who have been able to keep their mortgage payments on time, not the ones who stopped their payments. And this started to happened when the banks refused to refinance at the beginning of the current real estate, subprime loan crisis.­

spot_img

Foreclosure solutions forum to address crisis

by Juliana Birnbaum Fox

Marilyn Reynolds (en el micrófono), miembra de ACORN, anuncia la crisis hipotecaria en el Este de Oakland durante un conferencia: de prensa. (photo by Jennifer Salgado)Marilyn Reynolds (speaker), a member of ACORN, announces the foreclosure crisis in East Oakland at a press conference. (photo by Jennifer Salgado)

Oakland members of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) held a press conference this Thursday to announce plans to address the local effects of the nationwide mortgage meltdown. They called on homeowners and tenants to attend a December 8th Foreclosure Crisis and Solutions Forum, which will discuss possibilities for providing relief to victims of predatory lending and others affected by the growing problem. The forum will be attended by Senator Don Perata and other elected officials and representatives of financial institutions, along with local residents.

“There are communities falling into devastation because of these foreclosures,” said Marilyn Reynolds, a local ACORN member who announced the group’s plan to address the problem. “We ask that banks restructure loans, working with existing borrowers and those in foreclosure.”

Other proposed actions include a temporary stay on foreclosures by lenders and long term, fixed-rate loan modifications that would replace the adjustable rate mortgages linked to the crisis. ACORN is also calling for continued support and resources for targeted outreach in order to educate borrowers and prevent the disaster from worsening.

“Banks could save someone’s credit, livelihood and self esteem by doing something as simple as a stroke of the pen,” Reynolds said. “I’m hoping they will have a heart and restructure these unscrupulous loans.” She expressed frustration at the misconception that the crisis was the fault of uneducated borrowers.

“I know a lot of collegeeducated young people whose credit is ruined and who are going to be without a place to live, or have to go back to live with parents,” she said. “The small print in their loans would be hard for the average lawyer to sort out.”

Dorothy Hicks, a victim of the crisis who is also organizing with ACORN, pointed out that tenants are also feeling the negative impacts of foreclosures. When lenders have foreclosed on the owners of rental units, utilities have been turned off and in some cases tenants have been evicted in violation of the law.

Californians of color are particularly vulnerable to foreclosures. A report released by RealtyTrak showed that five of the top ten cities for foreclosures in the third quarter of 2007 are in California. A previous ACORN study showed that minorities are disproportionately affected by the crisis; for example, higher-income Latino homebuyers were more likely to receive a high-cost loan than low-income whites.

“We must continue to make comprehensive reforms to the sub-prime industry now,” said Leslie Marks, a foreclosure victim and single mother living in Oakland who is among the organizers of the forum.

“We’re calling on people who have been affected by this crisis or know someone who has, and the community as a whole, to attend the December 8 meeting,” Hicks stated. The event will be held from 9:30 a.m. to noon at the East Oakland Senior Center at 9255 Edes Avenue. For more information, contact Oakland ACORN at 510-434-3110, ext.235, or at ­caacornoaro@acorn.org.

spot_img

Chávez loses referendum in Venezuela

by the El Reportero news services

Hugo Chávez­Hugo Chávez

President Hugo Chávez narrowly lost both parts of the referendum to reform the constitution on 2 December.

The result does not mean that Chávez’s grip on the country’s institutions has been weakened.

No opposition leader called on Chávez to make good on his threat “to go” if he was defeated in the referendum.

Paradoxically, Chávez’s influence in Latin America may even have been strengthened because his ready admission of his defeat (before all the ballots had been counted) underlines his democratic credentials and demolishes the rightwing claim that free elections are not possible in Venezuela.

Calderón rethinks relations with Gordillo

MEXICO – President Felipe Calderón’s private secretary, César Nava, said on 24 November that the government is rethinking its relations with Elba Esther Gordillo, the hugely influential leader of the teachers’ union and leader of the Partido Nueva Alianza.

Felipe CalderónFelipe Calderón

The statement, by one  of Calderón’s chief advisers, has huge implications. Gordillo sees herself as one of the country’s power brokers: she claimed that she tilted the 2006 election Calderón’s way. This year, however, her importance in elections has been less meaningful.

Draft constitution “approved” in Bolivia amid bloodshed

Against a backdrop of violence which saw at least four dead and 130 injured, on November 24, delegates from the ruling Movimiento al Socialismo (MAS) pushed a draft of the new constitution through the constituent assembly.

Jurisdiction ruling in Nicaragua-Colombia will be Dec 13

Whether it has jurisdiction  to decide a border dispute between Nicaragua and Colombia over a tiny group of Caribbean islands, will be decided on Dec. 13. The U.N.’s International Court of Justice (ICJ) will rule on December 13.

Nicaragua petitioned the ICJ, the United Nations’ highest tribunal based in The Hague, to grant it sovereignty over the archipelago and end the row that Colombia says started nearly 200 years ago and was settled nearly 80 years ago.

“The judgment will deal solely with the preliminary objections raised by Colombia regarding the jurisdiction of the court,” the ICJ said in a statement.

The two nations, separated by Panama and Costa Rica, lay claim to the isolated Caribbean Islands San Andres and Providencia off Nicaragua’s Atlantic Coast, as well as several keys and some 50,000 sq km of fishing waters.

According to a Reuter’s repor­t, Colombia told the court in June border disputes were inevitable after the fall of the Spanish Empire in the Americas and the one in question was “definitively settled” in 1928, when Nicaragua and Colombia signed a treaty granting Colombia sovereignty over the islands.

But Nicaragua’s Sandinista government in the 1980s annulled the accord and argued it was signed while Nicaragua was under U.S. military occupation.

Many Nicaraguans consider the treaty a U.S. payoff to Colombia for arranging the independence of Panama from Colombia in order to build the Panama Canal.­

spot_img

Study: juveniles of color are sentenced disproportionately to life without parole

by Adolfo Flores

Antonio Núñez, a 14-year-old youth from California, paid a high price for his actions during a night out with older friends. He participated in kidnapping, 7and was behind the wheel of a subsequent high-speed chase by police. Núñez received the state’s most severe sentence after the death penalty, life without parole (LWOP).

Children of color, in particular, are disproportionately ­sentenced to LWOP in the United States, according to a study by the University of San Francisco School of Law.

California has the highest racial disparity in the nation, with Latino youth being five times more likely to receive life without parole than white children.

Núnez is one of 94 Latino youth out of a total of 227 sentenced to LWOP in that state, according to the study, Sentencing Our Children to Die in Prison.

The report attempts to raise awareness on the issue.

Plans are for it to be used as a lobbying tool to pass S.B. 999, a California bill that seeks to abolish the practice.

“There is severe racial profiling that goes well throughout the system,” said study co-author Michelle Leighton, director for human rights programs at the Center for Law and Global Justice. “This disparity continues across the country.”

In North Dakota, for example, Latino children are 16 times more likely to receive LWOP than white children. In Pennsylvania Latino children are three times more likely.

“Youth of color have a disadvantage at every stage of the criminal justice system,” Leighton said.

Children of color, for example, are held in custody, prosecuted as adults in criminal courts, given adult sentences and are more likely to do their time in adult prisons than whites.

The study claims the U.S. government is aware of the problem but has done little to address these disparities. It adds the government does not even collect data on racial disparity among juveniles receiving LWOP.

Experts argue these sentences have an adverse effect on their development.

“They’re subjected to violence and sexual violence at the hands of other prisoners and in some cases correctional officers,” said Alison Parker, senior researcher in the U.S. program of Human Rights Watch.

Parker, who has conducted past research on the issue, said the number of youths receiving LWOP in California alone has increased by 47 since 2005.

During her research she has spoken with authorities on these disparities. Their answer is that children of color commit more crimes than white youth.

“We can’t say conclusively that the fact that more kids of color are sentenced to life without parole is due to racism,” Parker said.

Through out the world there are 2,388 youth sentenced to die in prisons. Of those, all were sentenced in the United States except for seven in Israel. They are the only two countries that have youth serving LWOP.

The report claims the United States directly violates the International Civil and Political Rights Covenant, which states that juveniles can be tried in adult courts in “exceptional circumstances.”

Connie de la Vega, coauthor of the study, argued the thousands of juveniles sentenced to LWOP well exceeds its mark of “exceptional circumstances.

The authors argue the United States maintains that it only sentences juveniles to LWOP at the state level, not the federal level, and that states don’t have to follow international law.

Parker called the argument “ridiculous because states are obliged to follow international law. There are youths serving LWOP in federal prisons, I found one.”

She said that during her research she met one youth at the U.S. Penitentiary in Ellenwood, Pa.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics stated they had no data because there were no youths serving LWOP in federal prisons.
­Hispanic Link.

spot_img

Boxing

Saturday, December 8 – at Las Vegas (HBO PPV)

  • 12 rounds, WBC welterweight title: Floyd Mayweather Jr. (38-0, 24 KOs) vs. Ricky Hatton (43-0, 31 KOs).

­Sunday, December 23 – at Tokyo

  • 12 rounds, WBC bantamweight title: Hozumi Hasegawa (22-2, 7 KOs) vs. Simone Maludrottu (25-1, 10 KOs).
spot_img

Cesar Latin All Stars to perform at Metronome

by Juliana Birnbaum Fox

Poncho SánchezPoncho Sánchez

Cesar’s Latin All Stars will be playing live music. The ten-piece Latin orchestra, led by Cesar Ascarrunz, plays salsa, merengue, boleros and cumbias to dance the night away. Starting Dec. 7th, every Friday and Saturday night from 9 p.m. – 2 a.m. at the Metronome Dance Center. Tickets are available at the door, at 1830 17th Street (at De Haro) in San Francisco. For more information call 415-252-9000, or visit www.metronomedancecenter.com.

Latin Jazz Sensation Poncho Sánchez Performs at Chabot College

The sizzling sounds of Poncho Sánchez come to the Chabot College Performing Arts Center in Hayward. Recognized as one of the premiere Latin ensembles of our time, Sanchez mixes Afro-Cuban rhythms with bebop to create his own style of music, inspired by the conga playing of Cuban great Mongo Santamaria.

On Friday, Dec. 7 at 8:00 p.m. at the Chabot College Performing Arts Center, located on campus at 25555 Hesperian Boulevard in Hayward. The group performs under the direction of Jon Palacio, Director for Jazz Studies at Chabot College, and a former alumnus of both the Jazz Ensemble and the Jazz Orchestra.

Tickets are $25 for general admission and may be purchased by calling (510) 723-7233 or by visiting ­www.chabotcollege.edu/music.

City College holds Job Fair

Current and future positions available at City College of San Francisco will be highlighted at the fourth annual Job Fair Friday, Dec. 7 from 9 a.m. – 4 p.m. at the Hotel Kabuki, 1625 Post Street, San Francisco. Jobs available include full and part-time faculty, administrative, and support staff. Participants can meet College department representatives, obtain applications and job announcements, learn how CCSF’s hiring process works and get answers on site. For full details about the Job Fair, telephone (415) 241-2246 or visit the College’s Human Resources Department web site at www.ccsf.edu/hr.

Campaign Boot Camp at the Commonwealth Club

Attorney/activist Christine Pelosi, daughter of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, will discuss public service through grassroots organizations and community politics, and offer a glimpse into American politics and the hectic world of campaigning. Pelosi has over 30 years of experience in voter contact, education and mobilization in local, state and federal efforts. On Wednesday, Dec. 12, check in for the event is at 6pm, the program starts at 6:30, and at 7:30 there will be a reception and book signing. Pelosi will be at the Club office, 595 Market St., 2nd Floor, San Francisco. Tickets are $12 for Members, $20 for Non-Members. To buy tickets call 415/597-6705 or register at ­ www.commonwealthclub.org.

Dance and learn about Foundation for El Salvador

The Foundation of Disabled ­and Handicapped for Integral Development in El Salvador, an organization benefitting people disabled during the Salvadoran war, will host an evening with Orquestra “Son de Caña.” Dance and inform yourself about the Foundation whose president will update us on the ecological and cultural project to be built in the province of San Vicente, El Salvador. On Saturday, Dec. 15th, 7-12 p.m.at the Women’s Building, 3543 18th St. in San Francisco.

spot_img

Menudo revive en Making Menudo

por Antonio Mejías-Rentas

New MenudoNuevo Menudo

MENUDO VIVE: La banda de chicos latinos más famosa de la historia ha sido revivida en un reality show de TV que reveló a sus ganadores la semana pasada en una transmisión a nivel nacional.

Los cinco nuevos miembros de la banda fueron anunciados el 20 de noviembre en la fi nal de MTV de Making Menudo. Hicieron su debut ofi cial el miso día en programa diario TRL de la cadena. El nuevo Menudo comenzó con una campaña publicitaria bilingüe que incluyó apariciones programadas la semana pasada en programas como Despierta America y Escándalo en Univisión y Telefutura, respectivamente, así como en el Desfile del Día de Gracias de Macy en NBC.

Los cinco miembros seleccionados a través de Making Menudo, que resultaron de audiciones de talento nacionales y eliminaciones al estilo reality, son Carlos Olivero, Chris Moy, Emmanuel Vélez Pagan, José Bordonada Collazo y José (“Monti”) Montañez. Aunque no era un requisito en la competencia, todos comparten raíces puertor- riqueñas con los miembros originales de Menudo.

Los nuevos miembros de la banda tienen un contrato de grabación con Epic, 4que lanzará un EP de cuatro canciones en las tiendas Target el 18 de diciembre. Se espera un CD completo en la primavera.

Menudo original, que tuvo varias listas en los ‘70s y ‘80s, grabó 35 álbumes, vendió más de 40 millones de discos y fue un éxito de taquilla en el mundo.

Ricky MartinRicky Martin

La banda lanzó las carla 4reras de varios intérpretes, tales como Ricky Martin y Robby Rosa.

Robby RosaRobby Rosa

ARTE COSTOSO: Un día después de que la Corte Suprema de Virginia bloqueó la venta de una altamente valorada pintura de Rufino Tamayo, otra pintura por largo tiempo perdida fue subastada en poco más de $1 millón, Tres personajes, un colorido óleo, el 20 de noviembre por Sotheby’s en Nueva York.

La obra había sido robada a sus dueños y encontrada hace cuatro años en un basurero por una mujer de Nueva York. Su precio de venta de $1,049,000 fue un poco menor del récord establecido en 1993 por unno de los artistas mexicanos más importantes del siglo 20.
­Hispanic Link.

spot_img

Did Mexico cause the war in Iraq?

­by José de la Isla

HOUSTON — A lingering question has surfaced: Did Mexico and the undocumented traffic that crosses its northern border into the United States cause the war in Iraq?

If “illegal immigration” is becoming a presidential campaign issue, you should ask each and every candidate about his or her position on this.

The issue might have stayed in the closet had it not been for a recent essay and a round of commentaries in the high-brow tabloid New York Review of Books. It started this way.

Christopher Jencks, in the Sept. 27 issue, presented one of the best summaries in print in the English language about immigration-policy issues.

He was reviewing Patrick Buchanan’s ridiculous book, State of Emergency.

In his essay, Jencks argued that about half of the undocumented immigrant men and women hold regular jobs. The other half work off the books. The regular half provide employers with a Social Security number. The Social Security Administration (SSA) credits their retirement accounts with both workers’ and employers’ contributions. But what if the account doesn’t belong to anyone? What if no one claims it at retirement time?

Jencks says State University of New York political scientist Peter D. Salins estimates “no match” accounts hold more than $586 billion. Most “no matches” come from fake numbers migrants who lack papers use to get work.

There are two outstanding facts about U.S. immigration to take further into consideration. One is that migrants from Mexico make up 60 to 65 percent of this total (depending on the place, time and circumstances).

And those who use fake, or other people’s, or made up Social Security numbers may never claim the money they and employers contributed.

Basically, after the Treasury collects the money, it allows the SSA to carry the amount as a receivable for bookkeeping purposes. And Treasury uses the funds to pay other government expenses.

The biggest one is the war in Iraq. Right now it is running coincidentally about $500 billion, according to the National Priorities Project. If no one claims this SSA windfall, it’s free money to pay for the war.

Some may claim the funds do not automatically go to cover war expenses. True. So let’s say it goes to Medicare and Medicaid and we launder it that way. That means undocumented migrants are actually huge contributors to the U.S. fiscal well-being.

Since Mexicans and “illegal immigrants” cannot be heroes in this scenario, would there have been an Iraq war unless they caused it? You know we would not pay for it in our right minds. Forget about the alleged falsified CIA-intelligence information, the invented “weapons of mass destruction” and the later argument about punishing Saddam for torturing his own people.

Couldn’t U.S. foreign-policy leaders now claim the Iraq War was really an immigration sweep to prevent “no-match” dollars from causing inflationary pressures inside the government.

The war in Iraq was the fastest way to spend the money.

This has a perverse logic to it. By more tightly regulating our fluid borders immediately after 9/11, we forced millions of undocumented visitors from Mexico to stay here in order to pay for what they started.

So it makes sense then to have them pay. As a suspicious class of people, their illicit activities — like renting, seeking work, driving, having families, going to college, getting sick — is just like what terrorists would do. So it’s not demented to say these immigrants are not unlike terrorists. And it is not shameful for this nation to apply the unclaimed money to fight terrorism.

Some have argued low-skill immigration is needed because immigrants will do the jobs most of our citizens won’t. Now, with this new understanding, we can have immigrants who do our other dirty work pay for our war, too.

We don’t want to foot it ourselves with new taxes, nor do we want our grandchildren stuck with the bill. We want to go shopping at the mall, remember? Well, here it is. The “Illegal” part of immigration is necessary because that way our millions of undocumented workers will never have the right to claim their money.

Let’s keep vilifying them, so we won’t feel bad about taking the dough.

Now tell me again, what is it about “illegal” you don’t understand?

­[José de la Isla, author of “The Rise of Hispanic Political Power” (Archer Books, 2003) writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service. E-mail joseisla3@yahoo.com]. ©2007

spot_img

The old man’s last gasp

by José de la Isla

HOUSTON – Fidel was calling by cell phone during Hugo’s final remarks at the National Stadium in Santiago de Chile, after King Juan Carlos of Spain had told Chávez, Venezuela’s president, to shut up.

The convalescing Cuban dictator wanted to tell Chávez he was thinking about the Chilean volunteers who had gone off to fight against Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza in the 1960s.

Is Fidel’s reminiscence of consequence? You decide.

The Somoza regime was in trouble after Sandinista guerrillas, funded by the Cuban regime and the Soviet Union, were engaging the government. But support for the Sandinistas didn’t mushroom until after the devastating 1972 earthquake that struck Managua (and the Somozas stole much of the international aid sent). Jimmy Carter withdrew U.S. support to the Nicaragua regime, and Somoza resigned in 1979.

Daniel Ortega, a member of the multiparty junta, was later elected president. He served from 1985 to 1990, backed by Castro. The well-armed, U.S.-backed Contras moved against Ortega as he tried out socialist approaches. Encountering considerable internal dissent, he directed his hostility toward the United States.

More than 30,000 Nicaraguans died in the conflict between the Sandinista government and the Contras. It brought on in the U.S. the Iran-Contra scandal, where Col. Oliver North and members of the Reagan Administration defied Congress’s Boland Amendment, sold arms to Iran, and used the proceeds to supply the Contras.

Since those times, the Soviet empire has collapsed. With it went the Soviets’ direct and indirect trade subsidies to Cuba. Ever since, the Cuban regime has been less able to provide basic goods to its people. It has moved into tourism and even some alleged narcotrading to get hard currency.

In light of the resulting consumer scarcities, black marketing and rising human rights abuses, preparations for the 1991 Fourth Congress of Cuba’s Communist Party brought some expectations of change. According to journalist Andrés Oppenheimer’s book, “Castro’s Final Hour: The Secret Story Behind the Coming Downfall of Communist Cuba,” 1.1 million opinions were collected by the party and compacted into 76 reports filling 9,063 pages. Reformers even thought about a structural change with a reform-minded prime minister directing the government.

A classified report went to the Central Committee that counted 3,300 people who wanted free farmers markets. Nearly 100 said they wanted a multiparty system and 50 proposed a market economy. These numbers were barely a whisper but they were considered a roar to a system that barely tolerates dissent and certainly not opposition. Popular demand for reforms could not be altogether ignored.

Raúl Castro even was reported in support of some of the reforms. But he was conspicuously absent at the convening of the Congress. He did not appear until toward the end. Fidel put a stop to that reform movement.

That’s why the secret poll, reported this month by the International Republican Institute, should not have come as much of a surprise. Younger and more educated Cubans drive up the numbers to show overwhelming support for a more democratic system (76 percent) and a market-driven economy (84 percent).

Once affiliated with the Republican Party but now reputedly non-partisan, the IRI conducted 600 man-on-the street interviews on the island. The methodology used, where respondents didn’t know they were being interviewed, remains a controversial technique among pollsters.

What is not controversial is that the Old Man, in his fantasy ideological heroics and scarcity economics, did not take people’s simple needs into account. Instead, he created depression-like queues for mealtime commodities. The 1991 poll and the more recent one also suggest people don’t want to let go of the gains their country has made, as in health care and education.

Among the Old Man’s last gasps over the cell phone to Hugo Chávez were not braggadocio concerning how many he helped live but about squandering lives and the country’s treasury to resist, to fight, to die — for God knows what.

[José de la Isla, author of “The Rise of Hispanic Political Power” (Archer Books, 2003) writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service. E-mail ­joseisla3@yahoo.com). ©2007

spot_img

Do not use “illegal alien,” use instead, undocumented

by Marvin J. Ramirez

Marvin RamirezMarvin Ramirez

It happens in many aspects of our lives.

Sometimes people, due to a sense of superiority, disrespectfully call people names – maybe purposely to offend or disgrace. It could be said to a person who is overweight. And without respect or consideration, someone might call him or her, fat. Or it might be to a person with a physical disability, being called cripple. And the same works for a person who is undocumented in the country.

Out of respect, and this is to remind everyone reading this article, who uses pejorative terms when referring to people as ‘illegal’, being undocumented is not a crime. In common law, for something to be crime, there would have to be an injured party. Common Law is still used in this country by million of people. (On later articles, I will talk about it).

People migrate because of wars or economic hardship in their countries, where most of the time they are proprietors.

So, they have to seek ways to support their families in foreign lands, and most of the time, there is no way one can wait until there is a visa available.

Name calling becomes more part of the culture when our own media uses pejorative terms in their headlines to label a certain class of people. This incites those who harbor hate and dislike against immigrants.

With this respect, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists (NAHJ), concerned with pejorative terms to describe a part of our community – approximately 11 million undocumented people – has called on the national media to stop using the term “illegals” as a noun, “short hand for illegal aliens.”

According to Juan Fidel Larrañaga, an education advocate in New Mexico, the NAHJ is particularly troubled with the growing trend of the news media to use the word “illegals” as a noun, shorthand for “illegal aliens,” he says. Using the word in this way is grammatically incorrect and crosses the line by criminalizing the person, not the action they are purported to have committed.

Shortening the term in this way also stereotypes undocumented people who­ are in the United States as having committed a crime. Under current U.S. immigration law, being an undocumented immigrant is not a crime, it is a civil violation. Furthermore, an estimated 40 percent of all undocumented people living in the U.S. are visa overstayers, meaning they did not illegally cross the U.S. border, Larrañaga says.

“In addition, the association has always denounced the use of the degrading terms “alien” and “illegal alien” to describe undocumented immigrants because it casts them as adverse, strange beings, inhuman outsiders who come to the U.S. with questionable motivations. “Aliens” is a bureaucratic term that should be avoided unless used in a quote.

Next time, please members of the public and the media, use undocumented, not illegal.

­

spot_img