by Cecilio Morales

Cecilio Morales

With the new year arrives a perfect moment to reconsider the anti-immigrant demand that newcomers assimilate.

In linguistics, it refers to altering a sound, as happens when a language adopts foreign words (for example, the Spanish lazo, which became the English lasso).The fifth meaning, also figurative, is what people have in mind in the immigration debate: to absorb immigrants, or any culturally distinct group, into the prevailing culture. Yet in all the meanings of “assimilate,” something is consumed, absorbed, incorporated (literally, to become part of a body) after some process of digestion and alteration.All of this means that “B” becomes somehow enmeshed in “A.”

In the case of the United States, what is that “A” and why does it deserve pre-eminence?

The answer is more complicated than it sounds.History tells us that the first so-called New World inhabitants were the Indians. The European colonists did not assimilate into Indian society.

Are anti-immigrant advocates suggesting that we at last show some respect for the native inhabitants?

Somehow, I think not.What is today the United States, history also tells us became the colonial territory of three European powers: England, France and Spain. Which one of their cultures deserves to be first? On what grounds?Let’s try history again.In 13 of the North American English colonies, a civil war broke out in the 1770s. The population was so divided that an estimated 100,000 loyalists fled abroad at the end of the conflict. At that time, cultural roots among whites were about evenly divided between England and Germany to the point that choosing a national language for the new nation was deferred as too divisive.We might be singing “O, sagt, könnt ihr sehen” on the Fourth of July had the Deutsch, or “Dutch” prevailed, but then we’re forgetting the “other Persons” of the Constitution, who were African and spoke multiple languages.

Then there’s the purchase of land from France (the Louisiana territory) and Spain (Florida).

By the 1840s and ‘50s, what was to become the third major European group of the early United States arrived: the Irish.

They were certainly not English.So remind me, again, in this mix of Africans, English, French, Germans, Irish and Spanish, by what reason was the culture and language of the English to be accorded legal supremacy, when even the English dared not debate it for fear they would lose a vote?But wait. There’s the entire Southwest and West, stolen outright by war and conquest. Its predominant language and culture was not English.

Why should the territory from Texas to California have to assimilate the culture and language of the last and most unlawful newcomers, the Anglos?

Much the same question could be raised about almost any corner of the Earth.

People have the inalienable right to their own language and culture. Asserting that right is in the best tradition of the United States (even though in many chapters of the nation’s history it was not observed), as it is of the United Nations and of Lady Liberty, whose powerful gaze watches over both from her island.

(Cecilio Morales is executive editor of the weekly Employment & Training Reporter in Washington, D.C. Reach him at ­Cecilio@miipublications.com).­ ©2007

by Javier Sierra

Javier Serra

The brush of destiny painted a very bad stroke on Olga Argüelles’s town. One hundred years of toxic bombardment have devastated Anapra, New Mexico, with a life sentence of an endless source of inmates for the state’s prisons.

“All of my 18-year-old son’s friends have been in prison,” says Argüelles. “Almost every single family in Anapra has had problems with the law. And it has been like this for generations.”

Also, the level education level of Anapra’s children is one of the country’s lowest. Argüelles says that there have been years when not one single high school student has graduated, and that sometimes a decade has gone by without any students getting their high school diplomas.

“Here we have three buses to take our children to elementary school,” she says. “But there is only one to take our high school students.”

What is going on in Anapra? Where did that brush stroke come from? Where did these one hundred years of solitude originate?

The answer lies just on the other side of the Rio Grande, in El Paso, Texas. There, for more than a century, the ASARCO smelter spewed hundreds of tons of some of the most toxic metals in existence, including lead. Because of the area’s prevailing winds, Anapra received an enormous portion of this toxic brush stroke, which left the land barren and Anaprans in a vicious circle of lead poisoning.

Lead is a toxin of great potency. Children —because of their natural inclination to put objects in their mouths— are most exposed and vulnerable to lead’s terrible effects, including irreparable brain damage, mental retardation and aggressive behavior.

“My son has a very high IQ,” says Argüelles. “But he has cognitive problems and his aggressiveness is incontrollable.”

This relationship between lead and aggressive, criminal behavior has been well documented by many studies in recent years. The conclusions of the most recent one, whose author is investigator Rick Nevin, are as stunning as they are persuasive.

Nevin looked into the crime rates in relation to lead levels in the environment in nine countries. And in all of them, up to 90% of the variation in violent crime was explained by lead.

In the U.S., for example, Nevin observed that there have been two sharp increases of lead poisoning in the 20th Century, one at the turn of the century, caused by the content of lead in paint; and the other after World War II, due to the addition of lead in gasoline. Some 20 years after those two historical circumstances, crime levels skyrocketed.

Nevin also observed that 20 years after the elimination of lead in paint and gasoline, crime levels dropped dramatically.

Lead, however, is not the only factor that influences crime levels. These future criminals, in most cases, grow up in places where guns, poverty and drugs are abundant.

“I would say that the inner-city environment provides the weapon, and lead pulls the trigger,” says Dr. Kim Dietrich, a researcher at the University of Cincinnati.

Lead arrived in Anapra in a different way, but the consequences are the same.

“Here, generation after generation, we are the children of lead,” says Argüelles. “It won’t let us learn, it makes us aggressive, it won’t leave us in peace.”

After decades of negligence by New Mexico officials, Argüelles and the rest of Anapra’s residents are demanding that the federal government investigate this situation and that a reopening permit be denied to the smelter that sentenced them to life in toxic conditions.

Learn more at ­www.sierraclub.org/lead. (Javier Sierra is a Sierra Club columnist).