Friday, July 19, 2024
Home Blog Page 568

Seven Latina leaders honored in Washington by Congressional Hispanic Caucus

by Alex Meneses Miyashita

Janet MurguíaJanet Murguía

Seven Latina professionals were honored for their accomplishments by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute during its Latina Leaders Celebration Oct. 2.

The event was one of several that were part of the CHCl’s 2007 Hispanic Heritage Month-related activities held in Washington, D.C. from Sept. 30 to Oct. 3.

Activities included a two-day public policy conference hosted by Congressional Hispanic Caucus members, a comedy night featuring Carlos Mencia and an awards gala Oct. 3.

Among this year’s CHCI Latina leaders were award-winning actress América Ferrera, well known for her role as Betty Suárez in hit television comedy Ugly Betty.

Ferrera plays a shy but determined first generation young Latina who is employed at a fashion magazine and makes her way up the career ladder through hard work.

“I feel very honored and somehow very undeserving” of this award, Ferrera said.

The awards have been presented to successful, ground-breaking Latinas for the past five years by Rep. Hilda Solis (D=Calif.), who serves as the event’s honorary co-host.

“I’m happy that we had one of the premier young up-and-coming stars in the community, who spoke so very humbly, but also people who have been working for many years who don’t always get the pat on the back for doing all the hard work they do on behalf of the Latino community,” Solis told Weekly Report.

Other awardees included: Ivelisse Estrada, senior vice president of corporate and community relations for Univisión Communications Inc.

Aida Giachello, executive director of the Midwest Latino Health Research’Training and PolicyCenteratthe Universityof Illinois, Chicago.

­Carmela Lacayo, president and CEO of the California-based Asociación Nacional Pro Personas Mayores.

Gloria Molina, member of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.

Short nurses strike put hospitals on notice

by Ali Tabatabai

Nurses on a three-day strike in front of St. Lukes HospitalNurses on a three-day strike in front of St. Lukes Hospital

On the second day of their strike, nurses gathered outside of St. Luke’s hospital on Thursday to protest what they call a reduction of services in lower income areas.

The California Nurse’s Association (CNA) accused the Sutter Health network of shifting vital medical services away from hospitals such as St. Luke’s to more affluent neighborhoods.

“Sutter should show more respect for both the communities it serves and its caregivers, not abandon them,” said Zenei Cortez, member of the CNA council of presidents.

Kevin McCormack, spokesperson for St. Luke’s said the claim was a distraction from Sutter’s new contract agreement with it nurses and that CNA was using the event as a tactic to get more nurses to join their union.

McCormack added that St. Luke’s has offered its nursing staff a 25.5 percent pay raise in the new contract.

Strikes and lockouts are expected to continue throughout the week at several Bay Area hospitals within the Sutter network.

Narrow CAFTA-DR win in Costa Rica

by the El Reportero’s news services

Óscar AriasÓscar Arias

The government-led “Yes” campaign narrowly won the referendum on the free trade agreement between Central America, the Dominican Republic and the US (CAFTA-DR) on 7 October. The margin was fewer than 50,000 on a decent turnout of around 60 percent of the electorate.

President Oscar Arias, who was elected in 2005 promising to ratify the deal signed in 2004, recognized the strength of the opposition with a conciliatory speech when the result was declared. Leaders of the “No” campaign, however, challenged the vote and demanded a recount. International observers said there were no obvious problems with the vote.

Calderón goes off-piste

Felipe Calderón Hinojosa is becoming unpredictable. On economic policy, he has confounded orthodox neoliberals by not only introducing, but extending, price controls. On foreign policy, he is shifting Mexico away from the US and closer to Latin America. Within Latin America, Mexico is seeking a rapprochement with Venezuela and Cuba.

No one’s backyard

Left-right: Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Venezuela Hugo Chávez, and Bolivia Evo MoralesLeft-right: Brazil President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Venezuela Hugo Chávez, and Bolivia Evo Morales

The high profile welcome received by Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad during his visit to Bolivia and Venezuela was a conscious rebuff to the foreign policy goals of George Bush and Tony Blair.

This is part of a long-term trend, as Latin America has moved to the left and become increasingly disenchanted with the broad thrust of western policy-making in recent years. Indeed many of the sentiments expressed by its more radical governments are also shared by those of its moderates and underline the increasing loss of influence that Washington is suffering in what it used to consider as its “own backyard”.

Brazil last week pointedly supported Iran’s right to develop nuclear energy and opposed the imposition of sanctions on Burma’s military dictatorship.

While the Iranian president’s visit to Bolivia was intended to signify the opening of diplomatic relations between the two countries, Iran has already established relations with Chile, Mexico, Brazil, Ecuador and Argentina among others. Brazil’s foreign minister, Celso Amorim, recently visited Iran and, during a joint press conference with President Bush at Camp David, Lula publicly defended Iran as “an important trade partner” with whom Brazil has “no political divergence”. Rejecting US calls to shun the Iranian regime, Lula insisted, “we will continue to work together on what is in our national interest.”

Lula also defended Iran’s right to develop nuclear energy for peaceful means at the UN general assembly, while some other Latin American leaders went further.

Nicaragua’s president, Daniel Ortega, asked rhetorically: “Even if they want nuclear power for purposes that are not peaceful, with what right does [the US] question it?” (Guardian Unlimited)­

Presidential candidates continue to snub Latino issues forums

by Alex Meneses Miyashita

Janet MurguíaJanet Murguía

Only four presidential candidates—all Democrats— showed up at a forum sponsored by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute Oct. 3 during its annual Hispanic Heritage Month activities in Washington’ D.C., spurring 5criticism from some Latino leaders at the event.

“It’s a mistake for the other candidates not to have been here’ Janet Murguía’ president of the National Council of La Raza, told Weekly Report. “It’s a missed opportunity.”

All Democrat and Republican candidates were invited to participate, according to the CHCI. This includes eight Democrats and ten Republicans.

The quartet of Democratic candidates who spoke at CHCl’s 2007 public policy conference included Sen. Joe Biden (Del.), Sen. Hillary Clinton (N.Y.), former Sen. Mike Gravel (Alaska) and Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Ohio).

Democratic leaders at the event sharply criticized the absence of Republican candidates, stressing it was not the first time that they failed to address members of the Latino community.

“Republicans have been completely absent and I think that is an insult to our community’~ Sen. Robert Menéndez (D-N.J.) told a group of reporters in Spanish. ¢¢lf they… have rejected the opportunities to communicate with our community why they should be the president of the United States, I think the people will reject them in November of next year.~Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.) also chided them’ noting that all of the Republican candidates, except for Rep. Duncan Hunter (Calif.), refused to attend the National Association of Elected and Appointed Officials conference in Orlando in June. “This is a very clear message to the Latino community that the Republican candidates in particular do not value the Latino community and are not interested in trying tc have R diRlQ9Ue’’’She told Weekly Report.

Other recent instances in which Republican candidates have not participated in a public forum addressing issues of concern to Latinos and communities of color include a debate on PBS end another sponsored by Univisión with instant translation.

The Republican National Committee rejected the notion that the party is not interested in reaching out to Hispanics and earning their vote.

“That s just a political campaign that the Democrats want to do,” Hessy Fernandez, the director of Hispanic communications with the RNC, told Weekly Report.

Fernandez emphasized it was “ironic” that Democrats went on to criticize Republican candidates when only four of their candidates showed up at a forum put together by a “Democrat” organization.

“This organization tends to serve the interests of the Democratic Party,” she said.

The CHCh chaired by Democratic Rep. Joe Baca (Calif.), defines itself as a nonprofit nonpartisan organization.

But its 13 policy sessions were hosted by members of the all-Democratic Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

Roybel-Allard said there were probably “very valid” reasons as to why four of the eight Democratic candidates failed to confirm their presence at the forum.

“It was probably a result of the (legislative schedule) conflict we have here in Washington’” she said, adding that Democratic candidates “have made an effort to show up at other events that have been put on by the Latino community.”

New Mexico GQV. Bill Richardson (D)’ the only Latino running for president, was among the absentees.

Campaign spokesperson Tom Reynolds confirmed to Weekly Report they had a prior scheduling in Nevada.

Richardson also missed the CHCl’s gala the evening of Oct. 3, an event he was confirmed to attend, because of “plane malfunctions,” Reynolds said.

An Associated Press article on Richardson’s campaign stop in Boulder City’ Nevada stated the governor “is hoping for a strong showing in Nevada, scheduled to hold the second caucus in the nation Jan. 19.”

One report had Obama’s camp excusing his absence to celebrate his wedding anniversary at home, but he made campaign stops in IOWR that day. The RNC’s Fernandez maintained the GOP candidates “ere putting forth a positive agenda that benefits Latinos,” and criticized in particular Clinton’s universal health plan as e proposal that Hispanics “don’t want.”

Clinton, the leading presidential candidate among Democrats and Republicans according to recent polls, was the only candidate at the forum who received a standing ovation from CHCI conference attendees, which to~ taled more than 600 at the forum.

“This was an opportunity for her to talk to the Latino community that really has been very supportive of her,” Fabiola Rodríguez Ciampoli, director of Hispanic communications for Clinton’s campaign, told Weekly Report. “It was definitely an invitation we could not have missed.”
Hispanic Link.

Día de los Muertos exhibit at the Oakland Museum

by Juliana Birnbaum Fox

Una joven admira los altares del Día de los Muertos en el Centro Cultural de la Misión: (file photos by Marvin J. Ramirez)A young woman admires the altars during the Day of the Dead (file photos by Marvin J. Ramirez)

The Mexican festival of Día de los Muertos honors the enduring connection and communication between the dead and the living. The Oakland Museum of California’s eighth annual Days of the Dead exhibition, Pasajes y Encuentros: Ofrendas for the Days of the Dead, highlights three thematic “passageways” that connect the dead with the living: tradition, humor and spirit. The exhibition, which takes place from October 13th through November 25th features altars and artworks by Bay Area Latino artists. A free Sunday afternoon community celebration on October 21 includes music, ceremonies, craft activities, a mercado and creation of a community altar. For more information go to www.museumca.org.

Radio Bilingüe Live from a landmark indigenous summit

Radio Bilingüe will originate a live broadcast and webcast from the site of a landmark summit of Indian representatives from throughout the Americas on October 11, 12, and 14. The gathering is hosted by the traditional governments of the Yaqui and Tohono O’odham peoples and will take place in Vícam, in the heart of Yaqui territory.

Radio Bilingüe’s news coverage will highlight the efforts by Indian elders to protect their ancestral homelands and way of life from the growing threat of urban development, industrial contamination, deforestation, and corporate greed. The schedule includes a live broadcast of Radio Bilingüe’s flagship program Linea Abierta on Thursday October 11, and Friday October 12 from noon to 1:00, and La Hora Mixteca will air live interviews on Sunday, October 14, at noon. Noticiero Latino will air timely news features, and Radio Bilingüe Internet will maintain an active blog service from the summit. The talk shows and news feeds will also be available online via webcast and podcast through Radio Bilingüe’s website www.radiobilingue.org.

City College of San Francisco Board of Trustees to meet October 11 and 25

The Board of Trustees of City College of San Francisco will hold its regular monthly meetings on October 11 and 25. The Board will hold its study session on Thursday, October 11 at 5 p.m, and its action meeting on Thursday, October 25 at 6 p.m, both in the Auditorium at the College’s 33 Gough Street facility. The public is invited to attend both meetings. For further information, visit the City College of San Francisco website at www.ccsf.edu.

“Sock it to me” concert at the Jerry Garcia Amphitheater

A benefit concert collecting new socks and underwear (tag still attached) for San Francisco’s homeless will feature Big Brother & the Holding Company and Stymie & the Pimp Jones Luv Orchestra, with special appearances by Wavy Gravy and YouthSpeaks! The “Sock It To Me Concert” takes place on Saturday, October 13 at the Jerry Garcia Amphitheater from 6 to 9:30pm. Check your sock drawer and look for anything with a tag on it, or pick something up on they way. Examples from last year went far beyond our wildest dreams.. If it’s an undergarment and still has a tag on it, bring it down! This show will feature psychedelic blues-rock, simmering funk, comedy, spoken word and rock.

Oscar may speak Spanish again

by Antonio Mejías-Rentas

Belen Rueda en El OrfanatoBelen Rueda in the Spanish thriller “The Orphanage”

With an Oct. 1 deadline for countries to submit fi lms for Academy Award consideration, entries from Spain and various Latin American countries are already in the run for a nomination in the foreign language category.

Spain’s entry is El orfanato, a horror fi lm directed by Juan Antonio Bayona that’s set in an orphanage. The film has gained international acclaim prior to its commercial opening in Spain, Oct. 11. It was fi rst seen last May in Cannes, Last week it had its U.S. premiere at the New York Film Festival.

Should El orfanato pick up an Oscar nomination, it would be the 20th for Spain, which has won the foreign language award four times, the last time In 2004 for Alejandro Amenábar’s Mar adentro.

El orfanato is produced by Mexican director Guillermo del Toro, whose El laberinto del fauno was nominated last year in representation of Mexico. This year’s Mexican submission is also an international hit that premiered in Cannes and has yet to open commercially in its own country. Carlos Reygada’s Stellet Licht is about the moral confl icts of a man in a Mennonite community in northern Mexico.

Most of its dialogue is in the old German dialect of its people.

Mexico has been nominated a total of seven times. Prior to last year’s nomination for Laberinto, it competed in 2002 with El crimen del padre Amaro and in 2000 with Amores perros.

Another early submission came last week from Argentina, hoping to compete with XXY, a fi lm about a teenage hermaphrodite which marks the directing debut of Lucia Fuenzo.

She’s the daughter of Luis Puenzo, director of the 1985 La historla ofi cial, Argentina’s sole Oscar winner. Argentina has been nominated fi ve times.

A rare entry from Puerto Rico has also been submitted: director Carlitos Ruíz first film, Maldeamores.

The fi lm, about three Unconnected love stories, was produced by Oscar winning actor Benicio del Toro.

Puerto Rico has been nominated once: in 1989 for Jacobo Morales’s Lo que le paso a Santiago. Nominations for the 80th Academy Awards will be announced by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences on Jan. 22.

The awards ceremony is scheduled to take place Feb. 24 in Hollywood.

HispanicLink.

Santa Clara Board of Supervisors resolves to investigate Prudencial strike

by Juliana Birnbaum Fox

Prudential Overall Supply laundry workers, on strike in protest of the working conditions at the company’s Milpitas facilities, spoke out last week regarding alleged unfair labor practices and the possible impact on county uniform service. Milpitas workers walked out on September 11 after weeks of alleged labor law violations by the company. Prudential Overall Supply contracts with Santa Clara County to provide uniforms for hundreds of county employees.

“I am concerned about the fi rm’s ability to continue to provide the contracted services to the County due to the current job action,” said Supervisor Pete McHugh.

The Board of Supervisors unanimously resolved to investigate whether the strike is causing a disruption in the county’s laundry services and if there are grounds for termination of the contract, becoming the second California government to begin an investigation into possible Prudential service disruptions.

San Francisco residents fi le suit to stop construction of power plant in Potrero

A proposed combustion turbine power plant in the Potrero neighborhood was the subject of a lawsuit fi led in federal district court on September 24th as local residents attempted to stop the city from receiving the permits necessary to allow its construction. The fi ling parties allege that the proposed project, consisting of three combustion turbine “peakers” designed to supply energy in times of excess demand, has not been properly studied by the Environmental Protection Agency and Bay Area Air Quality Management district.

The lawsuit disputes the assumption that the aging Mirant plant nearby cannot be shut down without a replacement plant that continues to disproportionately pollute the Potrero and Bayview Hunters Point neighborhoods.

“There are green alternatives to these polluting power plants,” stated Joshua Arce, Executive Director of Brightline Defense Project, the non-profi t legal aid organization that fi led suit of behalf of the complainants. “The city should promote any alternative….that is not accompanied by further contamination of the community.”

“I’ve lived all my life in Potrero, and I too want the power plant closed, but it makes no sense to me to close one dirty power plant with three dirty plants,” said Regina Hollins a plaintiff in the case who lives blocks from the proposed site. “Too many of my friends and neighbors are sick and suffer from asthma.”

City officials announce first publication of guide for released prison inmates

A press conference held last month named September “Reentry Month,” focusing attention on the importance of reducing crime and saving public resources in San Francisco through providing close supervision, accountability and support forex-offenders returning to the community after being released from prisons and jails.

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, Public Defender Jeff Adachi, District Attorney Kamala D. Harris, and Sheriff Michael Hennessey announced the first-ever publication of Getting Out & Staying Out: A Guide to San Francisco Resources for People Leaving Jails and Prisons, a comprehensive resource guide to help recently released individuals navigate San Francisco’s public benefits, housing, health and employment service programs.

­“Recidivism is a dangerous and expensive cycle,” said DA Harris. “To address it, we must resolve that while we stand tough on crime, we will also be smart on crime. For nonviolent offenders, being smart means ensuring their transition to law abiding citizens, and this guide is one tool to help in that transition.”

The bill of sale

by Esther J Cepeda

Do you see a dollar sign on my forehead?

There’s a Mexican saying: “el nopal en la frente.” It translates as “having a nopal on the forehead –” a reference to the native prickly green vegetable. It means that your dark skin, eyes and hair make it obvious you’re a Mexican.

Merchants have turned the phrase on its head, so to speak. That “nopal” is now a dollar sign and rather than being a slam, it’s a target countless U.S. businesses are gleefully setting their sights on.

According to the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia’s Terry College of Business, Hispanics will wield $860 billion in purchasing power in 2007 and more than $1.2 trillion by 2012. Put into perspective, the 2007 Hispanic consumer market in the United States is about the same size as Mexico’s entire economy in terms of its gross domestic product.

Sounds impressive and — at a time when Hispanics in communities across the country are still trying to define their social and political power — it feels good to have cash-register clout. But at what cost?

The marketing blitz aimed at the wallets of this nation’s 49 million Hispanics seems like a win-win situation: a community is offered goods and services via culturally and linguistically sensitive messages and marketers make more money by tapping previously overlooked consumers.

More than that, there’s the implicit sense of legitimacy for a community currently besieged by negativity resulting from the immigration debate. Big businesses’ marketing message: “Never mind politics, we like you — and your money!” is a welcome relief from the barrage of cable TV talk shows and “letters to the editor” bemoaning this country’s “burden” of an estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants.

But aside from feeling good to be recognized, what are we getting in return?

Come-ons for ultra-cheap, jumbo-sized packages of Flamin’ Hot Cheetos at Wal-Mart to add to our staggering rate of obesity-related type-2 diabetes, cable programming packages featuring nearly limitless channels of Spanish-language soap operas even as we complain we just don’t have time to take English-as-a-second-language classes, and big luxury pickup trucks whose monthly costs would better serve a mortgage payment.

Don’t get me wrong, I love that we can buy empanadas and Cuban sandwiches at Yankee Stadium and send money to grandma with a debit card rather than by wire transfer. Who wants to complain about Verizon Wireless’s unlimited family calling plan? But buyer beware when it comes to tequila companies sponsoring Mexican art museum exhibits, slick celebrity gossip magazines “En Espanol,” and high-interest World Cup soccer-themed credit cards.

“As a Latino community, we can’t let the market tell us who we are,” Julia Alvarez told me last spring as she prepared to release her latest book, “Quinceañera.” It takes an unvarnished look at the multi-million dollar Sweet 15 industry which sells young girls the fairytale fantasy of a princess-like coming-out party and takes the focus off surviving the treacherous teen years.

“When marketers are looking at us, hoping to sell 400 million dollars in quinceañera products, and want to capture our population young so they can have them for the rest of their consumer lives,” said Alvarez, “we have to take the reigns to protect our young people. The market just wants to sell us stuff – it’s what they do.”

This is a crucial moment for Hispanic consumers. Now that we have choices tailor-made to us, let’s be smart about making them.

Realize that we can go to Hispanic Day at the baseball game without going overboard on the “new” salt and lime-flavored beer. We can take the kids to McDonald’s without making it our whole food pyramid. We can shop around for the best interest rate on a mortgage rather than rely on the place offering “press 2 for Spanish.”

Don’t let that “nopal” on your forehead become a sign that reads “sucker.”

(Esther J. Cepeda is a columnist with the Chicago Sun-Times. Contact her at chihuahua33@hotmail.com). (c) 2007

A tradition written in Spanish

­by José de la Isla

HOUSTON — At a time when so much that is significant about Hispanics is commonly believed to have little or no precedent, two national Latino groups celebrate journalistic landmarks this year.

The series of examples come out of journalism history and lead right to what you are reading today.

The first printing press in the New World was installed in 1539 by Spaniard Juan Pablos in Mexico City. It wasn’t until a century later, in 1639, that José Glover took the first press from England to Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The earliest Spanish-language newspaper in the United States, El Misisipi, began publishing in 1808 in New Orleans. The territory had been bought from France only five years before. The paper was affiliated with the Louisiana Gazzette, much as some metropolitan English-language newspapers today publish separate Spanish editions. In 1813, William Shalter and José Álvarez y Dubios brought out La Gaceta de Texas in Natchitoches, nearly a quarter century before Texas became an independent republic.

Between 1813 and 1937, there are records of 431 Hispanic newspapers published in the United States, nearly all in Spanish. Their scope spanned the virtual birth of the nation all the way to the eve of World War II.

Most of them appeared in California, Texas and other Southwestern states. But the Hispanic press was also significant in New York, Florida, Illinois, Missouri and Pennsylvania.

In no small way, these presses circulated the news and drove home important concerns — the annexation of territories, settlement and environmental issues, labor concerns, wars and conflicts, urbanization and poverty. A number were affiliated with unions, faiths and causes, taking sides on public policies.

They disseminated important expressions of working people, creating a publishing tradition. Every U.S. region has its unique Hispanic publishing legacy, leaving its distinct marks in state histories.

From these independent enterprises emerged two professional organizations a quarter century ago. Both were born in the Southwest, where they held their annual conferences together for the first couple of years. They have since moved their bases to the Greater Washington, D.C. area because so many of the decisions that affect their members are made there.

The National Association of Hispanic Publications today serves some 150 owners of Spanish-language and bilingual newspapers that reach 25 million readers.

The National Association of Hispanic Journalists has more than 2,000 members who work as editors, reporters, photographers, news directors and other professionals in broadcast as well as print media. Both are celebrating their 25th anniversaries.

While their coverage often overlaps what Englishlanguage media report on, there’s an important difference. They stress what their Latino communities need to know, and they speak editorially on their behalf.

Emphasizing that commitment is the Leadership Award NAHJ is bestowing Oct. 4 at its annual honors banquet in Washington, D.C. The recipient is a former newsroom colleague, Maggie Rivas-Rodríguez, now a University of TexasAustin journalism professor.

Driving is a right, not a privilege

by Marvin J. Ramirez

Marvin RamirezMarvin Ramirez

(This is the first part of a series of three parts)

In our previous edition editorial, I wrote about the constitutional rights provided by a good number of U.S. court decisions to driving, and suggested in a letter sent to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and several media organizations to look into those decisions so they can understand, that every individual in the United States has the right to use the U.S. highways and that no state shall infringe that right by demanding a driver’s license.

It means that driving is not a privilege, as interpreted by the California Department of Motor Vehicles, rather it is a right.

My goal in writing the letter and emailing those court decision was to help our city officials draft a local legislation that would permit those undocumented drivers, to be able to take a driving test at an accredited driving/traffic school, and present it to the city for the issuance of a driving permit within the City and County of San Francisco limits.

This would stop the San Francisco Police Department Motorcycle Unit to continue confiscating their cars for not having a driver’s license, and it would bring the city extra revenues instead of receiving revenues from the confiscation of the cars from poor families.

I hope the following decisions will aid the Board and the citizenry, to understand the meaning of the laws and be able to claim justice for themselves.

Right to Travel

DESPITE ACTIONS OF POLICE AND LOCAL COURTS, HIGHER COURTS HAVE RULED THAT AMERICAN CITIZENS HAVE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT STATE PERMITS

by Jack McLamb

For years professionals within the criminal justice system have acted on the belief that traveling by motor vehicle was a privilege that was given to a citizen only after approval by their state government in the form of a permit or license to drive. In other words, the individual must be granted the privilege before his use of the state highways was considered legal.

Legislators, police officers, and court officials are becoming aware that there are court decisions that disprove the belief that driving is a privilege and therefore requires government approval in the form of a license.

Presented here are some of these cases:

CASE #1: “The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived.” Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.

CASE #2: “The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

It could not be stated more directly or conclusively that citizens of the states have a common law right to travel, without approval or restriction (license), and that this right is protected under the U.S. Constitution.

CASE #3: “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.

CASE #4: “The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right.” Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

As hard as it is for those of us in law enforcement to believe, there is no room for speculation in these court decisions. American citizens do indeed have the inalienable right to use the roadways unrestricted in any manner as long as they are not damaging or violating property or rights of others.

Government — in requiring the people to obtain drivers licenses, and accepting vehicle inspections and DUI/DWI roadblocks without question — is restricting, and therefore violating, the people’s common law right to travel.

Is this a new legal interpretation ­on this subject?

Apparently not. This means that the beliefs and opinions our state legislators, the courts, and those in law enforcement have acted upon for years have been in error. Researchers armed with actual facts state that case law is overwhelming in determining that to restrict the movement of the individual in the free exercise of his right to travel is a serious breach of those freedoms secured by the U.S. Constitution and most state constitutions. That means it is unlawful.

The revelation that the American citizen has always had the inalienable right to travel raises profound questions for those who are involved in making and enforcing state laws. CONTINUES NEXT WEEK.