Wednesday, September 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 537

Pure Charanga in SF

by the El Reportero’s st staff

Pure Charanga in San Francisco

If in salsa music you distinguish Mambo, Guaguanco, Rumba and Merengue, you’re probably heard of Charanga – that especial sound of violins without horns and the whole percussion set accompanying the piano and the base guitar, wow! This is the Charanga playing this June 1, on Friday, at Roccapulco Super Club, 3140 Mission Street, SF. For more info call 415-821-3563.

Nicaraguan singer and composer Sergio

Charanga HabaneraCharanga Habanera

Tapia is honored What happens to be a four-decade plus one year of persistence and determination, singer and composer Sergio Tapia is actually celebrating his 41 years singing and recording like not to many soloists now-a-days.

The Nicaraguan community in the San Francisco Bay Area got together to give a well-deserved time of a life-time a big party, which also will be a fundraising for those in very big need in Nicaragua. Tapia, who a real estate agent during the day, three years ago was one of the prizewinners as Most Prominent Artists of the ‘Year by the Artists’ Association of Nicaragua Rafael Gastón Pérez’ and the National Assembly, who selected a number of Nicaraguan talents.

A l o n g Ta p i a w i l l a l s o p e r f o r m s i n g e r Martha Vaughan, Enoc Jerez, Anacela Contreras and Julio Lacayo. The event, organized by the non-profit organization FraterNca, will take place on June 4, at the State Room, 306 Baden Avenue, South San Francisco. For more info call FraterNica at 510-329-5778.

Fund raiser and all-night dance party with live music and DJs

Bring in the sultry summer season with a night of Latin music and dance presented by The Kanbar  Center for the Performing Arts and Canal Alliance. Let the music move you for an event that will include Salsa and Bachata dance lessons by Jose Santamaria, a known instructor, performer and choreographer; Latin music by DJ Gabby and DJ Coco and live Cuban music by Erick Barberia y su Timba Tonight; and a salsa performance by Jasdance Academy. Enjoy an evening of fiery Salsa

music and support the Canal ­Alliance’s Pathways  for Success for Marin’simmigrant community. All proceeds of the event will directly help people in need. Saturday, June 25, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 am., at the Kanbar Center for the Performing Arts at Osher Marin JCC, 200 North San Pedro Road, San Rafael.

spot_img

John Santos and Coro Folklórico Kindembo – La Esperanza

­­

­Sometido por John Murph

John SantosJohn Santos

John Santos provides further evidence as to why he’s one of today’s most significant figures in Afro-Cuban music. Not only does he demonstrate superb command as a percussionist, composer and bandleader, he knows how to deliver music that moves the mind and hearts as well as the body. Such is the case for the dazzling Filosofía Caribeña, Vol. 1, a non-stop body rocker that demands repeated listening because of its infectious rhythms and erudite intents. Santos underscores this music with political themes, touching upon the many commonalities between African-American and Latino communities in hopes to restore the once strong bonds. He pays tribute to numerous figures, ranging from Argentine singer Mercedes Sosa and percussionists Armando Peraza and Francisco Aguabella to his Cape Verdean father and San Francisco Bay Area mentors, Ron Stallings and Allen Smith.

The thematic eminence certainly lifts the music, most noticeably on John Calloway’s He Was One Of Us, which begins with Melecio Magdaluyo’s gushing tenor saxophone before the music quickly quells into pneumatic balladry, paving the way for Calloway’s ebullient flute solo. Santos’ gorgeous No Soy Combatiente, which features passionate lead vocals from Claudia Gómez and Pável Urkiza, and the anthemic Resistencia (Resistance), which provides the discs funkiest percussion breakdown. All of the compositions are sharply composed and arranged; they also allot plenty of space for extensive solos and group interplay yet also ­contain enough ingenious structures and melodic passages to prevent autopilot bluster. Santos fuels La Esperanza with similar auspiciousness.

This time he focuses more on traditional songs drawn from the Afro-Latin canon. Pairing down the instrumentation to mostly percussion, vocals, bass and strings, songs such as Shangó and Obatalá haunt and hypnotize because of their passionate antiphonic singing and rhythmic complexities. As Santos indicates in the liner notes, each song pays homage to significant sociopolitical activists and artists ranging from Amiri Baraka, Abbey Lincoln and Jiddu Krishnamurti on the enchanting Santos original La Esperanza to Felipe Alfonso Pérez founding member of the Conjunto Folklorico Nacional de Cuba on the gripping Tiempos de Oyá. Riveting throughout, La Esperanza is yet another shining jewel in Santos’ curatorial crown.

spot_img

At their peril, newspapers ignore new demographics

by Julio Morán

Hispanic Link News Service

For the third consecutive year, the number of journalists of color in U.S. newsrooms  declined, this time by nearly half a percentage point, to 12.79 percent. While the number of all professional journalists increased by about 100 to 41,600 in 2010, the number of journalists of color dropped by 200 to 5,300. Simple math indicates a net increase of 300 white journalists.

Those numbers are estimates because only about 60 percent of all U.S. print and online newspapers responded  to the annual survey by the American Society of News Editors (ASNE). Still, of the newspapers that did, nearly a third, 441, reported they had no journalists of color on their full-time staffs. Meanwhile, the 2010 Census reported that people of color now comprise 35 percent of the population and by 2042 are expected to make up more than half. It estimates that as early as 2020, they will comprise more than half of this country’s children.

In 1978 ASNE set a goal of having journalists of color working for the country’s daily newspapers equal their percentage in the U.S. population by 2000. By 1998, near stagnant at 11.5 percent, it was barely a third of the way there, so it shifted its target date forward a quarter of a century to 2025. The industry has given itself nearly a half-century to reach a movingparity target.

Not even keeping pace with population growth, it is further distancing itself from this growing young population by failing to respond to its interests or needs. The problem is worse in my home state. At 22.3 million, including 14 million Latinos, California has the nation’s largest population of people of color, 60 percent of the state’s 37.2 million residents.

Yet looking at the newsrooms of the state’s largest newspapers, Latinos are nearly invisible, particularly as top editors. At the San Diego Union-Tribune, Orange County Register, Los Angeles Times, San Jose Mercury News, San Francisco Chronicle and Sacramento Bee, the percentages range from 6.8 (Los Angeles Times) to 14.2 (Orange County Register), according to ASNE. The Chronicle and the Union-Tribune did not participate in the survey, but are believed to fall within that range.

The real dearth is in top editors. Among those newspapers, only one Latino name is listed on the mastheads: John Díaz, editorial page editor of the San Francisco Chronicle. (Although Tom Negrete is managing editor for production at the Sacramento Bee, his name is not on the masthead.) Real diversity has to start at the top. Latinos not only have to be in the decision-making process on stories, but they have to have a say in hiring. The most diverse newsrooms nationally are at newspapers where Latinos and others of color are among the top editors. California has one of the few Latinos as a top editor at a mid-size or larger newspaper.

Carolina García became editor of the Daily News of Los Angeles in 2008 after five years as editor of the Monterey County Herald. Her editorial page editor, Mariel Garza, is Latina. It is human nature to hire people with whom you feelcomfortable. The problem is that while most people of color seem to be comfortable with white people, not a lot of white people feel comfortable enough with us to hire us for important jobs.

This must change. The Latino population is projected to surge from 50 million today to nearly 140 million by 2050. Its share of the nation’s population is projected to double, from 16 percent to about 32 percent. That means nearly one of every three U.S. residents will be Latino. The Latino population increased by 15.2 million, or 43 percent, between 2000 and 2010, accounting for more than half of the 27.3 million gain in the total population. Latinos are part of this country’s landscape, like it or not.

The biggest threat to the demise of newspapers is not just the Internet. ­Newspapers are becoming irrelevant to a young and growing population of people of color who don’t see their reflections in them. I hope it doesn’t take Internet websites a halfcentury to understand the importance and value of diversity. Hispanic Link.

(Julio Morán, executive director of CCNMA: Latino Journalists of California, teaches journalism at the University of Southern California’s Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism. He is a former reporter for the Los Angeles Times and a member of three teams that won the Pulitzer Prize, including the Public Service Award for a series on Latinos in Southern California in 1984.)

spot_img

One in our favor

por Jorge Mújica Murias

mexicodelnorte@yahoo.com.mx

Check this out: “The City (and I skip the name to create suspense…) is intercultural, expressed in the sociocultural diversity of its inhabitants, sustained by indigenous and original populations and their people, as well as in the different nationalities, origins, languages and creeds, among other social collectives”.

Then check this: The government (of such unnamed city) shall “Promote that all media contribute to the strengthening of all cultures and human mobility”.

And the check this other one: “In the City … no person shall be the object of discrimination or exclusion due to their migratory condition. The public administration will guarantee the enforcement of programs and services geared to promote access and universal exercise of human rights”.

And this last one: All migrants have the right to “Regularize its migratory condition and access to a fair job which integrates freedom, equal treatment and benefits, as well as to have an adequate way of living which ensures his/ her health, food, clothing, housing, medical assistance and public education in all its levels, according to existing laws.” Good, enit? Yes, it is, but it is not a law in North Carolina or New México or Texas, and even less from Georgia or Arizona. Even more, it is not a law in any place ruled by a Democratic Party supermajority like Illinois.

It is the new Law on Interculturality, Attention to Migrants and Human Mobility in México City, approved a couple months ago by the Distrito Federal City Council, and officially presented to the citizenship this week in México City.

Is, whether some people like it or not, a law in complete favor or the migrant populations, a left-leaning law up to the point where the Party of the Democratic Revolution could be classified as leftist.

Long Live Human Mobility

This one is, I believe, a good approximation to what we have fi gured it should be a rational immigration law to treat migrants. And I refer to “treatment” because, as a State law, it could not legalize immigrants, just like in the U.S. the Arizona-like laws can not criminalize them, as the Courts have stated already. The new Mexico City law can only decide on the City’s treatment of immigrants. It is a law which changes the term of “migration phenomenon”, which makes me feel like a weird person doing something no one else does, as if immigration was a new thing and not something started 4 million years ago when the fi rst human being left Africa and became the  fi rst migrant of the world.

It is further, a law that does not look at immigrants like desperate lone workers moving only to find a job, but which includes “life partners, wives or husbands, lovers and live-in signifi cant others, as well as their bloodrelated relatives in a direct line without limit or degree, or up to the second degree in the case in a transversal line, and the people upon whom the migrant is related by guardianship or tutelage”. It is a law which rejects the US theory of the “melting pot”, the “E Pluribus Unum” which pretends that we all should forget our ancestry.

Instead, it calls to “have, keep and strengthen” the social and cultural” riches of all ethnic and national groups inside México City, and mandated the government of the City to create and enforce “support programs for immigrants and communities of a different ethnic origin regarding social, economic, political and cultural aspects, which should promote its visibility and to strengthen them in Mexico City”.

Furthermore, it is a law which mandates the City Government’s to “attend to and extend the rights (of the  law) to people born or living in México City or who leave it to reside elsewhere,” and to have programs to “promote, safe-guard, and defend the rights of Mexico City migrants living abroad”.

So to speak, the government of Mexico City could take to court any employer who violates the Rights of a México City worker in case ­of violation of his/her rights in Chicago and, in any case, could stand up to Homeland Security and La Migra anywhere in the United States.

In closing, it is a law which gives migrants their right to a legal status, jobs, housing, food, education and clothing, in clear opposition to the Federal Immigration Law signed this week by Mexican President Felipe Calderon, which considers a crime to hold a paying job without the proper immigration documentation, punished with deportation. And then some people wonder why some people consider me to be a lefty…

spot_img

What is HAARP? Part 6

­by Marvin Ramíre­z­

­­Marvin  J. Ramírez­Ma­rv­in­ R­­­­a­­m­­­­í­r­­­e­z­­­­­

FROM THE EDITOR: Given the latest tsunamis, earthquakes and hurricanes that have stricken several nations in the world, leaving many deaths and destruction, there are beliefs – based on scientific analysis – that t­hose events might have been man-made. El Reportero found the following article, which due to its length it will be published in seven parts. The is the sixth part.

In order to better read and follow up the complete story, we suggest you read part one, two and three in older editions in our website. You may access older editions at: https://elreporterosf.com/editions/?q=epublish/1.

— The FEIS and other Department of Defense documents indicate that interference problems would be too great to allow it to be located near other military facilities in Alaska. What kind of monster is it that they can’t even locate it near existing military bases?

Even the National Telecommunications and I n f o r m a t i o n A d – m i n i s t r a t i o n ( N T I A ) has reservations about HAARP transmissions.

They would only permit one of the test sites (Mineral Wells, Texas) to operate and so far have declined to extend all the requested frequency/power privileges necessary for the Alaska site. The enormous lobbying power of the military may overwhelm reason and force the NTIA to go along with the HAARP request. After all, Gakona is a “virtually uninhabited” area of the world. Electromagnetic radiation  has drawn increasinginterest in the form of health impact studies and research worldwide. The HAARP project will generate massive amounts of intentional and some unintentional radiation.

The HAARP environmental impact statements deny possible biological effects on humans, citing obsolete IEEE standards that basically say if the radiation  isn’t causing you to feelheat, it does not harm you. The preponderance of current studies indicate there can by promotion of cancer growth, disorientation, and other negative physical effects from low level, nonheating electromagnetic radiation. Why have our government agencies given their affirmation to something so clearly controversial?

After searching for answers to HAARP questions for the past year and a half, what has surfaced are very few answers and many more questions. How dangerous is HAARP (some physicists fear severe planetary consequences)? Commenting on HAARP in the April, 1994 issue of Physics and Society, C. L. Herzenberg says “…this technology  does present issues thatneed to be publicly addressed by the technical community”. Can HAARP change the ionosphere and weather patterns?? Can HAARP disrupt worldwide communications?? Can HAARP damage or destroy wildlife?? Will HAARP ­radiation change the migration habits of animals that come near it?? Can HAARP cause cancer?? Can the ionospheric effects of HAARP be controlled??

Why has the project been kept low profile and secretive, by the sponsors and the contractor (an ARCO subsidiary)? IT WILL CONTINUE ON THE NEXT EDITION.

spot_img

Banks hit hurdle to foreclosure

por Nick Timiraos

Joselin Reyes y otros partidarios escucharon mientras ciudadanos afectados: por la crisis de ejecución hipotecaria dieron recomendaciones en la demostración de Wells Fargo. (PHOTO FROM RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL)JJoselin Reyes and other supporters listened while citizens affected by the foreclosure crisis gave testimonials at the Wells Fargo demonstration yesterday.  (PHOTO FROM RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL)

Banks trying to foreclose on homeowners are hitting another roadblock, as some delinquent borrowers are successfully arguing that their mortgage companies can’t prove they own the loans and therefore don’t have the right to foreclose.

These “show me the paper” cases have been winding through the courts for several years. But in recent months, some judges have been siding with borrowers and stopping foreclosures after concluding that banks’ paperwork problems are more serious than previously thought and raise broader ethical questions.

This year, cases in California, North Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Maine, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Massachusetts and others have raised questions about whether banks properly demonstrated ownership.

During the fall, banks temporarily suspended foreclosures to address so-called robo-signing problems, where employees were approving legal documents without properly reviewing them. They said that in weeks they could fix what they considered to be simple clerical errors. But borrowers are uncovering new types of document problems, further delaying banks’ efforts to get foreclosures back on track.

In some cases, borrowers are showing courts that banks failed to properly assign ownership of mortgages after they were pooled into mortgage-backed securities. In other cases, borrowers say that lenders backdated or fabricated documents to fix those errors.

“Flawed mortgagebanking processes have potentially infected millions of foreclosures, and the damages against these operations could be significant and take years to materialize,” said Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., in testimony to a Senate committee last month .

Last month, the Maine Supreme Court reversed the foreclosure of Dana and Robin Murphy of Auburn, Me., after concluding that the mortgage company, a unit of HSBC Holdings PLC, filed “inherently untrustworthy” documents. An HSBC spokesman declined to comment.

The case began in 2008 when HSBC filed to foreclose on the Murphys, who hadn’t made a mortgage payment in two years. A trial judge initially rejected HSBC’s foreclosure because the bank couldn’t show it owned the promissory note—in effect, the borrower’s IOU.

The court later granted the foreclosure after HSBC submitted new ­paperwork. However, the Murphys found discrepancies and alleged that the documents were backdated. The court voided the foreclosure and sent the case back to the lower court to determine potential penalties.

Attorneys for borrowers reject the view that they are using arcane legal rules to secure free houses for clients who aren’t paying their bills. Efforts to gloss over incomplete or falsified evidence “can’t be tolerated by a free society,” says Thomas Ice, an attorney in Royal Palm Beach, Fla., who has a similar case before the Florida Supreme Court. “This is a huge assault on our legal system” that risks “turning us into a banana republic.”

 

spot_img

Says study: 93% of unborn babies contaminated with GMO toxins

by Ethan A. Huff,

Natural News

A landmark new study out of Canada exposes yet another lie propagated by the biotechnology industry, this time blowing a hole in the false claim that a certain genetic pesticide used in the cultivation of genetically-modified (GM) crops does not end up in the human body upon consumption. Researchers from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Sherbrooke Hospital Centre in Quebec, Can., have proven that Bt toxin, which is used in GM corn and other crops, definitively  makes its way intothe blood supply, contrary to what Big Bio claims — and this toxin was found in the bloodstreams of 93 percent of pregnant women tested. Published in the journal Reproductive Toxicology, the study explains that Bt toxin enters the body not only through direct consumption of GMOs, but also from consumption of meat, milk and eggs from animals whose feed contains GMOs. Among all women tested, 80 percent of the pregnant group tested positive for Bt toxin in their babies’ umbilical cords, and 69 percent of non-pregnant women tested positive for Bt toxin.

The only reason many countries even approved GM crops in the fi rst place was because they were told that GM crops were no different than conventional crops. The biotechnology industry has purported for years that the alterations and chemicals used in GM crop cultivation pose no risk whatsoever to human health, and that any GM substances that remain in food are broken down in the digestive system. Now that it has been revealed that such claims are complete fabrications, many groups are urging governments to pull GMOs from their food supplies.

“This research is a major surprise as it shows that the Bt proteins have survived ­the human digestive system and passed into the blood supply — something that regulators said could not happen,” said Pete Riley from GM Freeze, an alliance of organizations united against GMOs. “Regulators need to urgently reassess their opinions, and the EU should use the safeguard clauses in the regulations to prevent any further GM Bt crops being cultivated or imported for animal feed or food until the potential health implications have been fully evaluated.”

Most of the studies that have been used to validate the safety of GMOs have been conducted by the companies that created them in the fi rst place, so they are hardly a credible source for reliable safety data. Governments in North and South America, as well as throughout Europe, have essentially welcomed GMOs into the food supply based on fl imsy reassurances rather than sound science.

spot_img

Honduras headache clearing up but what is going in El Salvador?

by the El Reportero’s news services

Porfirio LovoPorfirio Lovo

Two developments, in two small neighbours in Central America, in the space of a week will cause serious domestic and international repercussions. Honduras is poised to shake off its pariah status and rejoin the Organization of American States (OAS) after President Porfirio Lobo finally managed to strike a deal with Manuel Zelaya nearly two years after he was ousted in a coup.

Meanwhile El Salvador, one of the top allies of the US in Latin America even after the left-wing Frente Farabundo Martí para la Liberación Nacional (FMLN) came to power in 2009, has been rocked by startling revelations about an entrenched organised crime network implicating business leaders, politicians, judges and the security forces.

Mexico considers cancelling state election

On 25 May the national leaders of the country’s three main parties announced that instead of allowing the electors of Michoacán to pick the next governor they may agree on a joint candidate. The proposal is a demonstration of how weak President Felipe Calderón Hinojosa now is and how vulnerable his key policy of using the army to combat drug trafficking gangs has become.

Michoacán has been the scene of a major upswing in gang violence in the past 10 days and the politicians now fear that elections, due this November, would be impossible. This admission raises questions for other state elections this year, especially in Nayarit, where 28 people were killed by gangsters on 25 May and which goes to the polls on 3 July, and also for the congressional and presidential elections due in July 2012. The US government has a clear understanding of what is happening in Mexico: on 24 May the US President nominated Earl Anthony Wayne, currently deputy ambassador to Afghanistan, ­to be the next ambassador to Mexico. Wayne, a career diplomat, was ambassador to Argentina from 2006 to 2009.

Paraguay, closer to becoming the region’s energy hub

Recent efforts by Brazil and Argentina to promote greater energy integration within the Southern Common Market (Mercosur) by providing concessions to their smaller partners, Paraguay and Uruguay, have finally made an integrated regional energy market a distinct possibility. In particular, both countries appear more inclined to accede to Paraguay’s longstanding demand to regain sovereignty over its hydroelectric output.

However, a fi nal decision, which rests in the hands of Argentina, has been stalled for political reasons, as the two Mercosur powerhouses assess the implications.

Cuba’s (r)evolution

On 19 April President Raúl Castro closed the ruling Partido Comunista de Cuba (PCC)’s sixth party congress with a defi ant vow “to defend, preserve and continue perfecting socialism, and never permit the return of capitalism”. It’s unclear what the 79-year old Castro meant by “capitalism”, but it’s certainly the case that the ruling gerontocracy that was (re-) confi rmed in the leadership may well struggle with the planned transition to a mixed system, whereby a centrally planned economy run by a one party state is expected to co-exist in harmony with a limited private entrepreneurial sector for the fi rst time in fi ve decades. (Latin News contributed with this report.)

spot_img

Top 10 media manipultion strategies

­

­­The Compulsive liar – The Internet site where all the fun starts. And your daily dose of entertainment

by Lhurey

The head of our mediaThe head of our media

Renowned critic and always MIT linguist Noam Chomsky, one of the classic voices of intellectual dissent in the last decade, has compiled a list of the ten most common and effective strategies resorted to by the agendas “hidden” to establish a manipulation of the population through the media. Historically the media have proven highly efficient to mold public opinion.

Thanks to the media paraphernalia and propaganda, have been created or destroyed social movements, justified wars, tempered financial crisis, spurred on some other ideological currents, and even given the phenomenon of media as producers of reality within the collective psyche.

But how to detect the most common strategies for understanding these psychosocial tools which, surely, we participate? Fortunately Chomsky has been given the task of synthesizing and expose these practices, some more obvious and more sophisticated, but apparently all equally effective and, from a certain point of view, demeaning. Encourage stupidity, promote a sense of guilt, promote distraction, or construct artificial problems and then magically, solve them, are just some of these tactics.

1 . The strategy of distraction

The primary element of social control is the strategy of distraction, which is to divert public attention from important issues and changes determined by the political and economic elites, by the technique of flood or flooding continuous distractions and insignificant information.

Distraction strategy is also essential to prevent the public interest in the essential knowledge in the area of the science, economics, psychology, neurobiology and cybernetics. “Maintaining public attention diverted away from the real social problems, captivated by matters of no real importance. Keep the public busy, busy, busy, no time to think, back to farm and other animals (quote from text Silent Weapons for Quiet War).”

2. Create problems, then offer solutions

This method is also called “problem -reactionsolution. “It creates a problem, a “situation” referred to cause some reaction in the audience, so this is the principal of the steps that you want to accept. For example: let it unfold and intensify urban violence, or arrange for bloody attacks in order that the public is the applicant’s security laws and policies to the detriment of freedom. Or: create an economic crisis to accept as a necessary evil retreat of social rights and the dismantling of public services.

3. The gradual strategy

Acceptance to an unacceptable degree, just apply it gradually, dropper, for consecutive years. That is how they radically new socioeconomic conditions ( neoliberalism) were imposed during the 1980s and 1990s: the minimal state, privatization, precariousness, flexibility, massive unemployment, wages, and do not guarantee a decent income, so many changes that have brought about a revolution if they had been applied once.

4 . The strategy of deferring

Another way to accept an unpopular decision is to present it as “painful and necessary”, gaining public acceptance, at the time for future application. It is easier to accept that a future sacrifice of immediate slaughter. First, because the effort is not used immediately. Then, because the public, masses, is always the tendency to expect naively that “everything will be better tomorrow” and that the sacrifice required may be avoided. This gives the public more time to get used to the idea of change and accept it with resignation when the time comes.

5. Go to the public as a little child

Most of the advertising to the general public uses speech, argument, people and particularly children’s intonation, often close to the weakness, as if the viewer were a little child or a mentally deficient. The harder one tries to deceive the viewer look, the more it tends to adopt a tone infantilising. Why? “If one goes to a person as if she had the age of 12 years or less, then, because of suggestion, she tends with a certain probability that a response or reaction also devoid of a critical sense as a person 12 years or younger (see Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”

6. Use the emotional side more than the reflection

Making use of the emotional aspect is a classic technique ­for causing a short circuit on rational analysis , and finally to the critical sense of the individual. Furthermore, the use of emotional register to open the door to the unconscious for implantation or grafting ideas , desires, fears and anxieties , compulsions, or induce behaviors …

7. Keep the public in ignorance and mediocrity

Making the public incapable of understanding the technologies and methods used to control and enslavement. “The quality of education given to the lower social classes must be the poor and mediocre as possible so that the gap of ignorance it plans among the lower classes and upper classes is and remains impossible to attain for the lower classes (See ‘ Silent Weapons for Quiet War ).”

8. To encourage the public to be complacent with mediocrity

Promote the public to believe that the fact is fashionable to be stupid, vulgar and uneducated…

9. Self-blame Strengthen

To let individual blame for their misfortune, because of the failure of their intelligence, their abilities, or their efforts. So, instead of rebelling against the economic system, the individual autodesvalida and guilt, which creates a depression, one of whose effects is to inhibit its action. And, without action, there is no revolution!

10. Getting to know the individuals better than they know themselves

Over the past 50 years, advances of accelerated science has generated a growing gap between public knowledge and those owned and operated by dominant elites. Thanks to biology, neurobiology and applied psychology, the “system” has enjoyed a sophisticated understanding of human beings, both physically and psychologically. The system has gotten better acquainted with the common man more than he knows himself. This means that, in most cases, the system exerts greater control and great power over individuals, greater than that of individuals about themselves.

­

spot_img

Boxing

Friday, May 28 — at Quebec City, Canada (ESPN2)

  • Sakio Bika vs. Jesse Brinkley
  • Eric Lucas vs. Librado Andrade

Saturday, May 29 — at Gelsenkirchen, Germany

  • ­WBC heavyweight title: Vitali Klitschko vs. Albert Sosnowski.

Saturday, June 5 — at New York, NY (HBO)

  • WBA light middleweight title: Miguel Cotto vs. Yuri Foreman
  • WBC lightweight title: Humberto Soto vs. Anthony Peterson
  • John Duddy vs. TBA.

Saturday, June 19 — at Oakland, CA (Showtime)

  • WBA super middleweight title: Andre Ward vs. Allan Green

Saturday, June 26 — at San Antonio, TX

  • Interim WBO bantamweight title: Eric Morel vs. Jorge Arce Julio Cesar
  • Chavez Jr. vs. John Duddy

Saturday, July 10 — at Hato Rey, Puerto Rico (Showtime)

  • WBO featherweight title: Juan Manuel Lopez vs. Bernabe Concepcion

Saturday, July 10 — at Las Vegas, NV

spot_img