Wednesday, September 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 532

Quick facts: FEMA, secret U.S. government

by U.S. Desk

In light of the recent popular protests in various parts of the world — particularly in Egypt — some conspiracy theorist have hinted at the possibility of the U.S. government using FEMA camps to hold potential protesters.

Some of these theories suggest that the government is prepared to turn FEMA camps into “concentration camps” holding “civilians” deemed a potential threat to the US government.

Such claims prompted Press TV to take a closer look at FEMA and its activities:

FEMA

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is an agency of the United States Department of Homeland Security, initially created by a Presidential Order on 1 April 1979. Fas.org.

FEMA had one original concept when it was created,  to assure the survivability of the United States government in the event of a nuclear attack on the nation.

It was also provided with the task of being a federal coordinating body during times of domestic disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and hurricanes.

Some people have referred to it as the “secret government” of the United States. It is not an elected body, it does not involve itself in public disclosures, and it even has a quasi-secret budget in the billions of dollars. The National Governor’s Association asked President Carter to streamline the nation’s disaster response mechanism. Endrtimes.blogspot.com.

Like the George W. Bush effort to bring agencies under the umbrella of Homeland Security, Carter created FEMA to combine the efforts of dozens of agencies. But just as Homeland Security has done with Katrina, the new FEMA bungled its first tests with the Washington Post reporting, “The new anti-disaster agency is on the verge of becoming a disaster itself.”

Prior to 1950, the federal government stayed out of local disasters for the most part, with only an occasional congressional appropriation when absolutely necessary. But in that year, Congress gave the president the power to declare disasters and dispense monetary aid. Newsmax.com.

Controversy surrounding FEMA

Not surprisingly, with the advent of FEMA, the number of national disasters began to balloon. However, it was not until Hurricane Andrew in August of 1992 that FEMA began to morph into what it now is. A lot of money went to the victims of Andrew, but politicians were beginning to see the potential in natural disasters. A community college got a new parking lot. Miami Beach got new art deco lifeguard stands. The then-governor of Florida, Lawton Chiles, obtained $25 million for a new prison that had nothing to do with the hurricane. Newsmax.com.

FEMA was not created under Constitutional law by the Congress. It was a product of a Presidential Executive Order.

FEMA has the power to suspend laws, move entire populations, arrest and detain citizens without a warrant and hold them without trial, it canseize property, food supplies, transportation systems, and can suspend the Constitution. Endrtimes.blogspot.com.

In 2004, the federal government used hurricane aid money to pay funeral expenses for at least 203 Floridians whose deaths were not caused by last year’s storms, the state’s coroners have concluded. Sun-sentinel.com.

As of 2008, FEMA had only spent about 6 percent of its budget on national emergencies; the bulk of their funding had been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure the continuity of the government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic.

Executive Orders associated with FEMA

Here are just a few Executive Orders associated with FEMA that would suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These Executive Orders have been on record for nearly 30 years and could be enacted by the stroke of a Presidential pen:

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with publicfunds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a 15-year period. Endrtimes.blogspot.com.

* EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. ­It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. Dmc.members.sonic.net.

spot_img

Boxing

­The Sport of Gentlemen

July 23

At Oriley Events Center, Springfield, Mo., B.J. Flores vs. Nick Iannuzzi, 10, cruiserweights.

At Mandalay Bay Events Center, Las Vegas (HBO), Amir Khan vs. Zab Judah , 12, for Khan’s WBA and Judah’s IBF junior welterweight titles; Peter Quillin vs. Jason LeHoulier, 10, middleweights.

At Ciudad Obregon, Mexico, Roman Gonzalez vs. Omar Salado, 12, for Gonzalez’s WBA flyweight title.

At Guadalajara, Mexico, Ulises Solis vs. Omar Nino Romero, 12, for Solis’ IBF light flyweight title and interim WBA World super featherweight title.

July 29

At Homebush, Australia, Billy Dib vs. Jorge Lacierva, 12, for the vacant IBF featherweight title; Junior Talipeau vs. Zac Awad, 12, super middleweights.

At South Point Hotel Casino, Las Vegas, Beibut Shumenov vs. Danny Santiago, 12, for Shumenov’s WBA World light heavyweight title.

 

spot_img

Thought you like this – is a little ‘strong’ on the adjectives, but so true

by an unknown author

Captain Bullshit Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming, Co-Chair of Obama’s deficit commission, calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he compared “Social Security” to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats. Here’s a response in a letter from an unknown farmer in Montana. I think he is a little ticked off! He also tells it like it is! “Hey Alan, let’s get a few things straight…

1. As a career politician, you have been on the public tit for FIFTY YEARS.

2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 54 YEARS (since I was 10 years old. I am now 64).

3 My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero ambition losers in return for votes, thus bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would have made Bernie Madoff proud.

4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and your ilk pulled the proverbial football away from millions of American seniors nearing retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age 67. NOW, you and your shill commission are proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN.

5. I and millions of other Americans have been paying into Medicare from Day One, and now you morons propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because you idiots mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal money from Medicare to pay the bills.

6. I and millions of other Americans have been paying income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you incompetent bastards spent our money so profligately that you just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come to the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.

To add insult to injury, you label us “greedy” for calling “bullshit” on your incompetence. Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for ­YOU!

1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?

2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and how much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers?

3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?

4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or, as usual, have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?

It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators called Congress who are the “greedy” ones. It is you and your fellow nutcases who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for what? Votes. That’s right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America for the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic political careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it. And you can take that to the bank, you miserable Asswipe. If you like the way things are in America, delete this. If you agree with what this fellow citizen says, PASS THE WORD ON!

spot_img

Los Pleneros de la 21 come back stronger than ever

­by Victor Franco Alonso

Los Pleneros de la 21Los Pleneros de la 21

Get ready to enjoy the legendary rhythms of Puerto Rico in hands of Los Pleneros de la 21. After more than 26 years on stage, the band founded by Juan Gutiérrez continues to spread its musical passion among the peoples of the world and to serve as a school for a new generation of Latinos. The band has toured over more than two hundred cities and has become the affirmation of Puerto Rican culture in important neighborhoods, such as Harlem or New York City. Its beats, that combine Jazz, Hip Hop or Blues, perfectly reflect the taste at the purest heart of Puerto Rico. The band’s performance is framed on the series Camino de la Cultura. Los Pleneros de la 21 will be accompanied by other two bands: La Mixta Criolla and Grupo Aguacero.

The event will take place Saturday, July 23 starting at 8 p.m. The chosen venue is the Brava Theater, at 2781, 24th Street, San Francisco. Tickets are $18 in advance and $20 at the door.

­T h i r d f e s t i v a l o f Peruvian food in SF

San Francisco’s Civic Center will again serve as setting for the third festival of Peruvian food in the city. In 2009, it took place in Roccapulco and its enormous success caused the festival to be moved to the center of the city, particularly to the Civic Center, where 20 restaurants were participating.

This year, this number will further increase, reaching 24 restaurants. The organization has emphasized that this will be a festival for the whole family, and will include games for children, two stages playing all kinds of music and soccer coaches. This is a festival that will gather the public for the taste in their palates. July 24 at San Francisco’s Civic Center.

For more information see http://festivaldecomidaperuana.com/?p=141

­Event for agricultural justice and healthy food

Join the Bay Area community to welcome the workers’ coalition from Immokalee to California. This is an opportunity to know this innovative agricultural work organization and its successful campaign for healthy food.

The organization wants to say stop to human rights abuses by the agricultural industry. A one-mile march will take place from the Center for Political Education, at 522 Valencia Street, Sunday, July 17 at 4 p.m. For more information: http://www.globalexchange.org/getInvolved/bayarea.php?uid=11592

 

­

spot_img

ICE’s ‘imprevements’ in deportation program fail to satisfy critics

Inmigrants in a rally­Inmigration rally

­­

by José A. Healy

Hispanic Link News Service

WASHINGTON, D.C. – As the U.S. government elaborates on “improvements” in its deportation criteria, community leaders and some states are challenging the policies as unfair and harmful to immigrant communities.

The federal immigration enforcement program, known as “Secure Communities,” will take extra care to avoid deporting undocumented victims or witnesses of crimes, John Morton, director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), promised in a press conference here June 17. Morton also announced that ICE will create an advisory committee to recommend how to focus better on deporting individuals who pose real security threats.

He said he is weighing whether to continue pursuing deportation action against individuals who have been charged only with minor traffic violations but haven’t been convicted. The changes to Secure Communities do not include an immediate halt to deportations of those found guilty of traffic violations such as driving without a license, or other minor misdemeanors.

“The program is not restricted just to those who are serious offenders. Obviously, we will identify and remove other offenders as well,” said Morton. Secure Communities was established in 2008 as an information-sharing program through which local jurisdictions transmit to the FBI fingerprints of detainees.

The fingerprints of undocumented immigrants eventually reach ICE, where officials decide whom to target for deportation, with emphasis on persons they identify as security threats.

The program came under criticism by many law enforcement and civil rights leaders after ICE’s own statistics showed that 60 percent of deportees under the program in the last three years were confocar para la deportación, enfatizando a las personas que identifican como amenazas a la seguridad.

El programa suscitó críticas de muchos dirigentes de la policía y de los derechos civiles después que las estadísticas del mismo ICE indicaron que un 60 por ciento de las personas deportadas bajo el programa en los últimos tres años había sido condenado sólo por delitos menores o que no había cometido ningún crimen. También se presentan interrogantes sobre el hecho que el programa causa que las víctimas de la violencia doméstica no reporten el abuso a la policía. Han surgido varios casos en los que los individuos que llamaron a la policía resultaron deportados después

que les tomaran impresiones de las huellas digitales.

“Tenemos que mejorar en el aspecto de asegurar que el programa se enfoque más en aquéllos que son de mayor riesgo a las comunidades”, dijo Morton.

Los agentes de ICE están recibiendo direcciones claras referentes a no iniciar el proceso de deportación contra las víctimas o los testigos de abuso, enfatizó, citando una nueva política que dirige a las autoridades estatales y locales a no mantener bajo detención por más de 48 horas a los individuos citados por infracciones migratorias solamente. Desde octubre del 2008 hasta marzo del presente, ICE deportó a 101.741 inmigrantes indocumentados mediante el programa de Comunidades Seguras. De esta suma, el 71 por ciento había cometido un delito, el 26 por ciento de estos, por delitos graves. No obstante, el 29 por ciento de los deportados no había cometido ningún crimen.

A pesar de los cambios al programa, los dirigentes comunitarios continúan opuestos. “No me parece que hubiera mucha mejora,” dijo jefe de policía jubilado de Sacramento, Arturo Venegas, Jr., vocero frecuente de las agencias policiales. “Nunca se ideó [el programa] para detener a las personas carentes de licencias de conducir ni que cometieran ofensas civiles”.

Según Morton, el programa se fundamenta sobre el compartir la información derivada de la toma de huellas digitales entre la FBI y el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional, y nunca se limitó a los inmigrantes criminales. Los estados no pueden negarse a participar, mantuvo. La FBI continuará transmitiendo la información derivada de las huellas digitales al Departamento de Seguridad Nacional, según la FBI. Venegas argumentó que las jurisdicciones locales y estatales pueden aprobar leyes que prohíban que sus agencias policiales tomen las huellas digitales de aquellas personas que cometan ofensas menores.

Previo al anuncio de Morton, los gobernadores de Nueva York, Illinois y Massachusetts declararon que sus estados dejarían de participar en el programa, aunque las huellas digitales que lleguen a la FBI desde ­aquellos estados todavía están siendo transmitidas a ICE. La Asamblea Estatal de California ya ha aprobado la ley TRUST, la cual suspendería la participación de California en el programa. Morton indicó que esta acción no es posible dada la naturaleza del programa de Comunidades Seguras.

Así no llegue a aprobarse un proyecto de ley, las agencias locales de policía y los condados podrían, por iniciativa propia, optar por no proveer a la FBI información derivada de la toma de las huellas digitales de personas detenidas que no consideran ser amenazas serias, según Quintin Mecke, vocero de Tom Ammiano, miembro demócrata de la Asamblea que representa San Francisco, y quien auspició la ley TRUST. Mantuvo ICE que toda jurisdicción a nivel nacional tendrá la obligación de activar el programa de Comunidades Seguras para el año 2013.

(José Healy es reportero con Hispanic Link News Service en Washington, D.C. Comuníquese con él a: josehealy@gmail.com).

spot_img

Poll: Few Americans fear ‘economic catástrophy’ if debt ceiling not raised

por Alexander Eichler
Of the 22 percent of

Americans who want the federal government to raise the debt ceiling, less than a third say that “economic catastrophe” would result from not doing so, according to a Gallup poll released Wednesday.

The poll examines Americans’ reasons for why they do or don’t want to see the debt ceiling raised. Only 22 percent of Americans want their member of Congress to vote in favor of increasing the debt ceiling, compared with 42 percent who would like their member of Congress to vote against it, a Gallup survey noted on Tuesday.

About a third of those who want the debt ceiling raised — 32 percent — said it should be done in order to “avoid economic catastrophe” when asked to give their reasons in an open-ended format.

Another 23 percent said it had to be done so as “to not default on debt,” 17 percent said it was “necessary” or there was “no choice,” and 16 percent said it should be done “to avoid [a] government shutdown” or a “suspension of services/benefits.”

By contrast, among the percentage who told Gallup they don’t want to see the debt ceiling raised, 38 percent said the U.S. already has “too much debt” and “cannot afford more.” Twenty-one percent said the U.S. needs to stop or cut spending, 13 percent said the country “needs to live within its means” and “budget better,” and 17 percent said that raising the debt ceiling “does not address [the] problem” and the country would only “keep raising [the] limit in [the] future.”

Economic catastrophe is more or less what members of the Obama administration have suggested will happen if the debt ceiling is not raised. In May, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner warned that if a deal is not struck by the August 2 deadline, and the U.S. defaults on its loans, it could precipitate a market panic “that threatens the health of our entire global economy and the jobs of millions of Americans.”

Yet as of Wednesday evening, the issue appears far from resolved. On ­Wednesday, the president had what reports describe as a contentious and unfruitful meeting with Congressional leaders, in which House Majority Leader Eric Cantor pressed Obama for greater spending cuts while remaining adamant that a deal could not raise tax revenues.

According to Reuters, Wednesday’s meeting ended with Obama warning those in attendance, “I have reached the point where I say enough.” While Cantor says a debt ceiling deal could not involve tax increases, nearly three-quarters of Americans are willing to accept some level of tax increases if it means reducing the defi cit, Gallup fi nds.

Only 20 percent of those responding to Wednesday’s poll said that they’d like Congress to reduce the deficit entirely through spending cuts, with no tax increases. A combined 73 percent said they would accept either a combination of spending cuts and tax increases, or a plan that relies entirely on tax increases. Thirty percent said they’d prefer budget reduction to be done “mostly with spending cuts,” while 32 percent said they’d like it to happen “equally with spending cuts and tax increases.”

The Gallup poll aligns with a number of others in recent months showing public tolerance of tax increases for the sake of defi cit reduction.

A Pew poll in June found that 66 percent of respondents supported raising taxes on incomes over $250,000, while  an Ipsos poll in May found that 61 percent of respondentsfavored tax increases as a means of getting the national debt down, either accompanied by cuts in existing programs or as the sole means.

spot_img

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Familes (Part Three of a series)

­

­by Marvin Ramíre­z­

­­­Marvin  J. Ramírez­Ma­r­v­i­n­ R­­­­a­­m­­­­í­r­­­­e­z­­­­

If you want to read series from the beggining (https://elreporterosf.com/editions/?q=node/5547)

 

N O T E F R O M ­T H E E D I T O R : Dear readers, I just ran into this super detailed article about the intricacies and composition of what is called the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). The FRB is the Central Bank of the United States, a privately-owned banking cartel, owned by the International Monetary Fund, which in turn is owned by a handful of corrupt families, whose only goal is to enslave the world under a global economy, a global heaLth organization (World Health Organization), a global judicial system (The Hague), private armies such as NATO, OAS – and under a new world government (United Nations,), which combined comprise what is now commonly known as The New World Order – disguised as ‘Globalism.’

By monopolizing the learning institutions in the U.S. and in most parts of the world, this banking elite has been able to implement and manage the current monetary system – an art piece of their own creation that controls practically all life – and death over the Earth.

They pay billions of dollars to universities to teach the arts of economics – through Masters and PhD degrees – to teach their own economic system, and a legal system that makes sure that no one understands – only lawyers – and most people are taught to obey, obey blindly, and with this, govern and impose their will through out the courts and the banking system.

The whole article was divided in four parts by the author. However, due that the first part of the series is 3,500 words, it will take El Reportero several weeks or months to publish a portion of it every week.

El Reportero suggests to anyone who finds any inaccuracy on this report to please email us with your comments.

by Dean Henderson

Infowars.com

Global Research

(Part three of a se­ries) The House of Morgan was cozy with the British House of Windsor and the Italian House of Savoy. The Kuhn Loebs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Lazards, Israel Moses Seifs and Goldman Sachs also had close ties to European royalty. By 1895 Morgan controlled the flow of gold in and out of the US. The first American wave of mergers was in its infancy and was being promoted by the bankers. In 1897 there were sixty-nine industrial mergers. By 1899 there were twelve-hundred. In 1904 John Moody – founder of Moody’s Investor Services – said it was impossible to talk of Rockefeller and Morgan interests as separate. [10]

Public distrust of the combine spread. Many considered them traitors working for European old money. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, Andrew Carnegie’s US Steel and Edward Harriman’s railroads were all financed by banker Jacob Schiff at Kuhn Loeb, who worked closely with the European Rothschilds. Several Western states banned the bankers. Populist preacher William Jennings Bryan was thrice the Democratic nominee for President from 1896 -1908. The central theme of his anti-imperialist campaign was that America was falling into a trap of “financial servitude to British capital”. Teddy Roosevelt defeated Bryan in 1908, but was forced by this spreading populist wildfire to enact the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. He then went after the Standard Oil Trust. In 1912 the Pujo hearings were held, addressing concentration of power on Wall Street. That same year Mrs. Edward Harriman sold her substantial shares in New York’s Guaranty Trust Bank to J.P. Morgan, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust. Judge Louis Brandeis convinced President Woodrow Wilson to call for an end to interlocking board directorates.

In 1914 the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed. Jack Morgan – J. Pierpont’s son and successor – responded by calling on Morgan clients Remington and Winchester to increase arms production. He argued that the US needed to enter WWI. Goaded by the Carnegie Foundation and other oligarchy fronts, Wilson accommodated.

As Charles Tansill wrote in America Goes to War, “Even before the clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan & Company in New York suggesting the flotation of a loan of $100 million, a substantial part of which was to be left in the US to pay for French purchases of American goods.” The House of Morgan financed half the US war effort, while receiving commissions for lining up contractors like GE, Du Pont, US Steel, Kennecott and ASARCO. All were Morgan clients. Morgan also financed the British Boer War in South Africa and the Franco-Prussian War. The 1919 Paris Peace Conference was presided over by Morgan, which led both German and Allied reconstruction efforts. [11]

In the 1930’s populism resurfaced in America after Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of 1929. [12] House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression, “It was no accident.

It was a carefully contrived occurrence…The international bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all”. Sen. Gerald Nye (DND) chaired a munitions investigation in 1936. Nye concluded that the House of Morgan had plunged the US into WWI to protect loans and create a booming arms industry. Nye later produced a document titled The Next War, which cynically referred to “the old goddess of democracy trick”, through which Japan could be used to lure the US into WWII.

In 1937 Interior Secretary Harold Ickes warned of the infl uence of “America’s 60 Families”. Historian Ferdinand Lundberg later penned a book of the exact same title. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas decried, “Morgan influence…the most pernicious one in industry and fi nance today.” Jack Morgan responded by nudging the US towards WWII. Morgan had close relations with the Iwasaki and Dan families – Japan’s two wealthiest clans – who have owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui, respectively, since the companies emerged from 17th Century shogunates.

When Japan invaded Manchuria, slaughtering Chinese peasants at Nanking, Morgan downplayed the incident. Morgan also had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison during WWII. After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland. [13]. IT WILL CONTINUE NEXT WEEK, with The House of Rockefeller.

For continue reading (https://elreporterosf.com/editions/?q=node/5623)

spot_img

The world loses the genius of the music made poetry: Facundo Cabral

­por Víctor Franco Alonso

FacundoFacundo Cabral

Poetry has been left without soul, the song is filled with dismay, the man’s freedom is totally restricted.

On July 9, at 5.20 in the morning, South America started to mourn in unison the murder of the genius and troubadour, Facundo Cabral, in Guatemala City. In fact, tears haven’t stopped and won’t stop anytime soon. The singer-songwriter died due to multiple gunshots fired by a band of strangers when he was on his way to the city airport in a vehicle steered by Nicaraguan businessman Henry Fariña.

The news of his death woke his followers up, like a dagger stuck in the heart and within few minutes all the international media echoed the event. It has been debated whether the crime entails political aspects or links to drugtrafficking. In statements to the newspaper El País, the Nobel Prize Laureate in 1992, Rigoberta Menchú, claims that it is the case.

No soy de aquí, no soy de allá, Cabral used to sing in one of his most well-known performances. He was from nowhere and loved to seize the days as if they were the last ones. “Blessed who doesn’t change the dream of his life for the daily bread”, he highlighted in an interview with the Argentine newspaper El Litoral.

He was born on May 22, 1937, and according to his own words, his mother gave birth in the streets of La Plata, province of Buenos Aires. Cabral had a very complicated childhood, and in one occasion when he escaped home, he arrived in Buenos Aires. There, he evaded the police fence that surrounded President Juan Domingo Perón, in order to ask him for a job for his family. He got it. During his teenage years, he fought thousands of battles, quitting his studies at an early age and being involved in quarrels that would deprive him from his freedom for about a year. Nevertheless, in his nomadic life he found light when he placed his fingers on a guitar.

It all began there.

He had enough stories in his back and in his head to share with someone whom only by barely touching the breeze of his songs would be captivated.

The honesty of his words could be sensed, the words of someone who lived with the basics and who turned the street into his school. A fervent believer, he didn’t trust governments or ideologies, but liberty and equality of men, who he believed was good by nature. He never silent his ­feelings and vindications, which forced him to exile during four years. UNESCO declared him World Peace Messenger. He shared stage with artists such as Alberto Cortez, Julio Iglesias, Pedro Vargas or Neil Diamond.

Nevertheless, he wasn’t a person who would easily settle and wanted to give even more to his public. “I turn the face to the enemy, the back to a good comment, because whoever takes compliments starts to be dominated”, Cabral asserted to El Litoral in one of his famous phrases.

Curiously, in his last concert he said goodbye to his followers, in order to rest in his homeland from the cancer that struck him; he wouldn’t go back on stage. This time he retires definitely from the world that gave him so much and that took away from him so much as well. In any case, he does leave a legacy of indelible and incomparable lyrics and emptiness. May he rest in peace, the genius, Facundo Cabral.

spot_img

15 food companies that serve you ‘wood’

Taco Bell's Food

By Miriam Reimer

The recent class-action lawsuit brought against Taco Bell raised questions about the quality of food many Americans eat each day. Chief among those concerns is the use of cellulose (read: wood pulp), an extender whose use in a roster of food products, from crackers and ice creams to puddings and baked goods, is now being exposed. What you’re actually paying for — and consuming — may be surprising.

Cellulose is virgin wood pulp that has been processed and manufactured to different lengths for functionality, though use of it and its variant forms (cellulose gum, powdered cellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, etc.) is deemed safe for human consumption, according to the FDA, which regulates most food industry products. The government agency sets no limit on the amount of cellulose that can be used in food products meant for human consumption. The USDA, which regulates meats, has set a limit of 3.5% on the use of cellulose, since fi ber in meat products cannot be recognized nutritionally.

“As commodity prices continue to rally and the cost of imported materials impacts earnings, we expect to see increasing use of surrogate products within food items. Cellulose is certainly in higher demand and we expect this to continue,” Michael A. Yoshikami, chief investment strategist at YCMNet Advisors, told TheStreet.

Manufacturers use cellulose in food as an extender, providing structure and reducing breakage, said Dan Inman, director of research and development at J. Rettenmaier USA, a company that supplies “organic” cellulose fi bers for use in a variety of processed foods and meats meant for human and pet consumption, as well as for plastics, cleaning detergents, welding electrodes, pet litter, automotive brake pads, glue and reinforcing compounds, construction materials, roof coating, asphalt and even emulsion paints, among many other products.

Cellulose adds fi ber to the food, which is good for people who do not get the recommended daily intake of fi ber in their diets, Inman said. It also extends the shelf life of processed foods. Plus, cellulose’s water-absorbing properties can mimic fat, he said, allowing consumers to reduce their fat intake. Perhaps most important to food processors is that cellulose is cheaper, he added, because “the fi ber and water combination is less expensive than most other ingredients in the [food] product.”

Indeed, food producers save as much as 30% in ingredient costs by opting for cellulose as a fi ller or binder in processed foods, according to a source close to the processed food industry who spoke with TheStreet on the condition of anonymity.

Inman said that in his 30 years in the food sciencebusiness, he’s seen “an amazing leap in terms of the applications of cellulose fiber and what you can do with it.” He said powdered cellulose has a bad reputation but that more of his customers are converting from things like oat or sugar cane fibers to cellulose because it is “snow white in color, bland and easy to work with.”

Most surprising, said Inman, is that he’s been able to remove as much as 50% of the fat from some cookies, biscuits, cakes and brownies by replacing it with powdered cellulose — but still end up with a very similar product in terms of taste and appearance.

“We’re only limited by our own imagination,” Inman toldTheStreet. “I would never have dreamed I could successfully put 18% fiber in a loaf of bread two years ago.”

He said cellulose is common in processed foods, often labeled as reduced-fat  or high-fi ber — products like breads, pancakes, crackers, pizza crusts, muffins, scrambled eggs, mashed potato mixes, and even cheesecake. Inman himself keeps a box of Wheat Thins Fiber Selects crackers, manufactured by Kraft Foods(KFT_)’ Nabisco brand, at his desk, and snacks on them daily, clearly unmoved by the use of wood pulp in its ingredients.

“Most consumers would be shocked to find these types of fi ller products are used as substitutes for items that they believe are more pure,” Yoshikami said. “We would expect increased disclosure to follow increased use of cellulose and other fi ller products as the practice increases in frequency.”

To that end, TheStreet rounded up a list of popular foods that use cellulose. It’s by no means an exhaustive list, and we suggest consumers read food labels carefully. Still, click http://www.thestreet.com/story/11012915/3/cellulose-wood-pulp-nev-er-tasted-so-good.html.

­(Please note the following lists are not exhaustive. Some companies list all ingredients on their Web sites. Other items were found in a local grocery store near TheStreet’s headquarters on Wall Street in New York City.)

­­

spot_img

Operation Castaway: ATF trafficked guns to Honduran criminal gangs

ATF emblemATF emblem

­

by Kurt Nimmo

Evidence indicates that the ATF not only provided weapons to Mexican drug cartels and gangs but also trafficked guns to criminal gangs in Honduras, including the murderous MS-13, or Mara Salvatrucha, known to work with the Sinaloa drug cartel.

inaloa, the largest drug trafficking organization operating in Mexico, has worked closely with Wacovia Bank. Last March, the bank revealed in court it had laundered nearly $400 million through a network of exchange houses, or casas de cambio, between 2004 and 2007. MS-13 is known for it brutality, including the murder of 28 Hondurans when gang members sprayed a bus with automatic gunfire in 2004.

New revelations about the federal operation – dubbed Castaway – came to light after Republican Rep. Gus Bilirakis sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder and acting ATF Director Ken Melson. “In recent days, it has come to light that the ATF and DOJ have participated in the act of ‘gun walking’ beyond the acts conducted within the scope of ‘Operation Fast and Furious,’” Bilirakis wrote to Holder and Melson.

The story broke on July 6 when journalists Mike Vanderboegh and David Codrea ran a story on Operation Castaway in The Examiner. “Virginia O’Brien, Special Agent in Charge at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Tampa Field Division, ran a gun-running investigation that was walking guns to Honduras using the techniques and tactics identical to Fast and Furious, it was reported to these correspondents this evening via private correspondence from a proven credible source,” the journalists wrote.

The ATF did not respond to the story when it was posted on July 6. The information also found its way to Chairman Darrell Issa of the House Committee on Oversight and Government ment Reform and Ranking Senate Judiciary Committee Member Charles Grassley.

The corporate media has yet to give Operation Castaway the coverage so far afforded to Operation Fast & Furious. Media Matters, the propaganda operation funded by the globalist George Soros, claims reportage on the growing scandal is some sort of right-wing conspiracy and defends the mendacity of government bureaucrats who have made excuses  for the illegal operations.

Obama has said AG Holder was not aware of Fast & Furious, so it is safe to assume the Holder and the Justice Department will claim they know nothing about Operation Castaway as well. As noted by Joseph Alan Sánchez writing for Infowars.com on Tuesday, the U.S. has shipped weapons south of the  border for over a decade.

“For at least a decade now, covert operation specialist Celerino ‘Cele’ Castillo III has been telling the world that the U.S. has been shipping guns south of the border on a regular basis as a sidebar to revelations of drug running from South America into North America. And now in the summer of 2011, the BATF is under fire for observing the sale and distribution of machine guns into Mexico. Congressional testimony in recent months is revealing a calculated plan called Operation Fast and Furious,” writes Sánchez.

Adding weight to Castillo’s accusation, one of the kingpins of the infamous Los Zetas drug running gang, Rejón Aguilar, told Mexican federal police earlier this month that the group purchased its weapons directly from U.S. government officials.

For his truth telling efforts and his Iran Contra whistleblowing, Castillo was convicted in 2008 on federal charges of dealing firearms without a license in a case marked by numerous irregularities and peculiar coincidences that raised the specter of a frame-up. Despite the denials, congressional Republicans believe the Fast & Furious scandal reaches the highest levels of the Justice Department.

Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with e Foods Direct (Ad)

They have asked the attorney general’s office to turn over a sweeping trove of emails, documents and other material to determine Washington’s role in the “reckless” operation that allowed U.S. semiautomatic weapons to flow to Mexican drug cartels, according to the Los Angeles Times. It should be obvious by now that the ATF is a renegade federal agency. Hearings should be held immediately calling for its decertification and the systematic disarming of its agents.

“Let’s transform them back into the stamp clerks (suitable for affixing labels on wine and whiskey bottles) that they once were. Then the only harm they can inflict on the body politic would be paper cuts,” writes Charles Heller, Executive Director of Jews For The Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

“Take away their badges. Badges are symbols of honor from a country as great as ours. BATFE Agents can carry business cards, like any other overpaid, tax consuming, foot dragging bureaucrat. Let’s convert these morally challenged individuals from jackboots to fur boots, or at least gumshoes without guns,” Heller concludes.

In addition to providing weapons to violent drug cartels favored by bankers, the Fast & Furious operation was cooked up to make it appear ­Americans legally selling firearms are engaged in criminal activity.

Democrats have wasted little time blaming the Second Amendment for the violence spawned by Mexican drug cartels and gangs using weapons provided by the U.S. government. In June, Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee, Elijah Cummings, tried to affix blame on law-abiding Americans.

His effort, however, was doomed to failure – at least in the “rightwing” media singled out by Media Matters and its patron, George Soros – when news of the complicity of the Obama administration, the Justice Department, and a renegade ATF hit the streets.

­

­­

spot_img