Wednesday, September 11, 2024
Home Blog Page 528

Relationship between medical access and HIV en latinos

by Con Ciencia News

Two years ago, Jose Garcia found out what HIV and AIDS mean. It was something he had never heard of until the day he was diagnosed with the diseases.

His lack of concern was so prominent that in 12 years, he had never visited a doctor until he felt sick: he had noticed spots on his skin and could not go to the bathroom. But it was too late. Garcia alternated working in the countryside and running a tobacco packing machine to send money to his family in Guatemala.

The disease took him by surprise, as he considered himself to be a completely healthy man.

These kinds of cases have led Wake Forest University Medical Center to conduct a study to identify whether a lack of access to medical care contributes to the fact that Latinos represent the highest mortality rate in patients with HIV, the virus causing AIDS.

“I hope this study helps Latinos in danger so that they will not continue with these disproportionate figures,” said Scott D. Rhodes, professor and study leader.

According to Rhodes, due to the increase of the Hispanic population in North Carolina, the number of sick people has increased.

“We want to identify why Latinos do not visit the doctor or undergo exams to determine whether they have HIV. We still do not know whether it is due to a lack of trust in doctors and nurses. There are many factors,” he said.

According to a report from the Center for Diseases Control, Latinos represented 20% of the new cases reported in 2004. This means four times more than nonHispanic Caucasians.

“My friends do not know anything about this disease, either. Every time we went to bars, we never used protection,” said Garcia, who says he is heterosexual.

Another of the reasons why Latinos do not visit the doctor is the lack of information in Spanish, the lack of medical insurance and the fear about their immigration status.

“For instance, here in North Carolina, there is a lot of information on diseases, but in English. How is a person who does not speak English supposed to learn about the disease?” said Rhodes.

According to Rhodes, the solution for this problem is to have better medical translation services and more interpreters, and to ensure that medical services do not depend on peoples’ immigration status.

“We need people to trust in us and to know they can gain access to medical services.

The current system confuses us and I think that is normal.”

For the study, at least 200 patients with HIV, such as Garcia, or patients with a high risk of being infected, were interviewed.

“This study will answer our concerns,” Rhodes concluded.

84 election fantasy: choosing between a black and brown president

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Blacks and Hispanics running for United States President? The highly visible presence of Mexican-American Bill Richardson, governor of New Mexico,, in the Democratic Party’s primary, and primary winner Barack Obama , son of a Kenyan businessman, have many young voters believing the two men are breaking new political ground. Not true. In a Hispanic Link column he authored a quarter century ago, Washington consultant Julio Barreto Jr. provides some context).

Presidential election year – 1984: First, the spirited nominating conventions in San Francisco and Dallas. Then, the grinding months of campaigning and debate. Finally, on Nov. 6, the nation’s electorate goes to the polls to choose.

Will it be:

  • The Democratic Party standard-bearer: A tough, charismatic liberal who promises   compassionate presidency, an embracing democracy – access and opportunity for all. By humanizing our national agenda, he’ll open up education and jobs for all those willing to pursue them. Spread the abundance.
  • The Republican Party standard-bearer: Tough and congenial, too, with the infectious smile of a winner. Social programs aren’t the panacea, he cautions. He warns of the spread of communism in our hemisphere and of the dangers of a high federal deficit. His blueprint for the nation stresses the work ethic. Let’s roll up our sleeves, America.

Pull the lever. Stamp your ballot. Your choices are:

  1. Jesse Jackson.
  2. Ben Fernández.

That’s the choice. A Black or a Hispanic.

Absurd? Impossible? Here we are, in July 1983, 16 months from ’84 election day, and Jesse Jackson is getting so much press as the “Black candidate” that it has to be turning the other Democratic candidates green with envy. And as of this moment, Ben Fernández, trying desperately to gain media attention talking about issues rather than his Mexican heritage, is the only declared candidate for the Republican nomination. He announced his candidacy at the National Press Club in Washington last week.

Both have qualifications and commitment arguably equal to those of the others who have lived, or presently reside, in the White House.

Jackson’s leadership talents are reasonably well known. Fernández’s aren’t. A self-made millionaire, he founded the National Economic Development Association (serving without compensation as its chairman and president for 15 months), is regarded as the father of an Hispanic financial industry which today boasts assets of $5.3 billion, served on Reagan’s transition team, held several posts with the Republican Party, was Special Ambassador to Paraguay, and even worked for General Electric early in his career.

In his “poor man’s campaign” for the Republican presidential nomination in 1980, he made the ballot in 18 states.

If the right Black or Hispanic presidential candidate came along, is it possible that U.S. voters could — in 1984 – look beyond their race or ethnicity and support one?

In the California gubernatorial race last November, Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, a Black who spent his whole political life appealing to the white majority, found out when California’s voters rejected him in the privacy of their polling booths after assuring him for months through opinion polls that he was their “choice.”

More recently, there was Federico Peña’s stunning victory in the Denver mayoral race.

With his “Kennedy charisma,” Peña waged a brilliant campaign which made him a surprise winner in Denver’s primary and showed him leading a dull, twice-defeated opponent by more than 15 percent days before the runoff. Peña won by a whisker. A switch of just 2,200 votes out of 154,000 would have reversed the result.

The Denver Post surveyed 120 voters as they walked from key polling places. Here are some comments reporters collected from those who chose Irish-American Dale Tooley over Mexican-American Federico Peña:

  • “I am afraid of partisanship with Peña”
  • ”The Spanish people are involved in crime.”
  • ”I don’t want a bunch of Mexicans running city government.”’
  • ”The Mexicans and Blacks will take over and the whites will be the minority.
  • ”I think I voice the opinion of a great number of whites. We’re being pushed into the background.”

An Anglo couple in their 60s was quoted: “We voted for Tooley because we’re bigots. Peña’s Hispanic and it’s scary to think about people who’ve never voted before, and they’re going to vote now.”

This, following a clean campaign in a “good” city.

The people, the media and the political establishment all are trying to cope with America’s newest Black and Brown revolution getting involved in the traditional political process. The way Jackson’s candidacy might rock relationships between White liberals and Blacks has Hamilton Jordan lecturing in Newsweek’s “My Turn” this month: “If Jesse Jackson enters the race, he must bear responsibility for the consequences of his running.”

That’s an outrageous, but not atypical, reaction.

That Blacks and Hispanics are believing that this nation might actually elect one of them as president has got to be the best news U.S. Americans have heard in a long time. It says that Blacks and Browns still believe the system can be fair to everyone, in spite of much evidence over the years to the contrary. It’s a refreshing, hopeful sign that our political apparatus can work for us all.

(Julio Barreto Jr. is a contributing columnist with Hispanic Link New Service.) ©2008

Sidebar Jesse Jackson ran for president in the Democratic Party’s primaries of 1980 and again in 1984. He wasn’t the first black to do so, however. Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm of New York campaigned for the Democratic nomination in 1972.

Millionaire banker Ben Fernández ran twice — also in 1980 and 1984 — for the Republican nomination.

Sometimes referred to as “Boxcar Ben,” he was born in a railroad boxcar in Kansas City, Kansas, one of seven children of immigrant farm-worker parents, He died in the year 2000.

Feeling nervous about ‘aliens’? So was Ben

by José de la Isla

HOUSTON – When a country undergoes fast and unexpected change or feels under threat, its people are subject to commit outrages. By now the list of offenses and crimes committed against immigrants that violate our own moral codes in the Unites States are worthy of a human-rights investigation.

Yet, is today different from other eras when intemperate prejudices by a loud minority shaped public attitudes?

One example some may remember hearing. It’s how Benjamin Franklin alienated German migrants to the colonies in the 1760s by calling them “Palatine Boors.” That’s the equivalent of saying they were “bad-mannered money suckers.” Franklin is now often used to illustrate how the German communities forming back then didn’t come about without rubbing the establishment the wrong way. He even had some complaints about their language and how English might be in jeopardy.

Sound slightly familiar?

The other part of the story, often left out, is that Ben Franklin, already famous and wealthy, stood for reelection to the Pennsylvania Assembly in 1764. He lost because the Germans, angry about the ethnic slur, turned out to vote against him.

A tempting moral could be one about political justice, but it actually runs deeper. That was 244 years ago. Much has happened since then.

Back then the national communities, with the exclusion of Native Americans, were getting established for the first time. It’s what we call nation-building today. But the form it took is virtually settled now, with our institutions, traditions and laws in place.

Yet “community”–with over 40 working definitions making the settlement part of town, neighborhood, subdivision, identity and interest groups–is a work in progress, and never really complete.

That’s just the nature of a dynamic society. It doesn’t really worry conscientious citizens. But something else is bothersome.

The editors of The Economist put their finger on it. “Countries, like people,” they said, “behave dangerously when their mood turns dark.” That darkness can result in bad law. It reflects anxiety turned into disdain. It is not fear. Fearful people cower. They run away. People act out of anxiety.

In her amazingly insightful book, “A Brief History of Anxiety,” Patricia Pearson recognizes the sense of alarm that makes up fear. She mentions dread, suspicion and anxiety.

The anxieties from 9/11 brought an end to the pop economics that had us believe we would get rich by willfulness and individualism and deregulation.

Followed by an endless war with a stateless, ununiformed enemy, it compromised civil rights and fed alien suspicions, the dread of a future continuing like our immediate past. Many today believe the more we work, the further behind we get. Ninety-nine percent of us didn’t advance economically in the last five years.

That’s what popular anxiety looks like to us. But by definition it is the result of someone new coming onto the scene. Plenty of people support the notion that somehow those “other people” are at least partly responsible. Even if they are not the disease, they are an unwanted symptom.

Referencing a WHO world mental health survey, Pearson points out that we are the most anxious people on earth. A person in the United States is four times more likely to experience generalized anxiety disorder than someone in Mexico. WHO reported that despite economic differences, 94.4 percent of Mexicans have never experienced depression or a major anxiety episode. (Other data show Mexicans, when they get here, get like us.) We are nine times more likely to experience anxiety than a Chinese laborer.

Pearson uses anthropological data to show that people in some cultures don’t even have a concept of fear as we know it. Others have ritual practices, which break the spells and bring relief.

Our communal cultural ritual for breaking the spell of rampant anxiety is an election. And as in colonial times, those who spur on dissention instead of encouraging civil community-building, even Benjamin Franklin, deserves to lose.

[José de la Isla writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service. He is author of The Rise of Hispanic Political Power (Archer Books). Email him at joseisla3@yahoo.com]. ©2008

How the prison business really works in the United States

by Marvin J. Ramírez

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin J. Ramírez

I can’t believe how ingenuous can politicians be in order to publically ‘show cause’ to why they should be elected, in their pursuit for fame and name at the time of elections.

A few weeks ago, I went to a press conference at the Excelsior District where was supposed to be the San Francisco Chief of Police Heather Fong, who failed to appear, along with Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval – who is leaving office because of term limits but running for judge – community activists, and relatives of murder victims Anthony Bologna and his sons Michael and Matthew, to hear about the wave of murders that are afflicting our City of San Francisco.

And as if more police force would solve the problem of violence, the politicians went on with fury calling for more funds for police force, and Sandoval so excitedly went on talking to the TV cameras and called for the troops, but, oopps! rapidly changed the statement to police presence. An honest mistake of words.

Meanwhile, District 11 Supervisorial candidate Julio Ramos, started distributing his campaign program right after the press conference, in which he calls for a faster 911 response time in the City, among other points for crime control.

And while the grieving family mourn their loved ones, and many more around the Bay Area and the nation resign to the police inability to solve most murder cases, and the public witness how hundreds of more kids being incarcerated and released with more criminal training every day after calls by politicians asking for a stronger stance on crime, crime is increasing more rapidly like never before.

Meanwhile, the feds ask the states to give more to the fraudulent war on terrorism that little by little is taking this nation into what was the Soviet Union: a police state without constitutional protections for the citizens, taking away education funding, while creating more jails and prisons, and recently building concentration camps around the country.

Why politicians mostly call for more money for police? Do they mean the police are going to take the criminals away and train them to be good citizens for the future? Do they sincerely believe that the cities will be free from bad people, and everybody else will live a happy ending, like in a Cinderella or Wonderland fairy tale?

What is happening to our country is beyond these calls for more money for street safety, because what our enforcement officers are mostly doing is just business as usual, a commercial business incarcerating human beings for profits for the benefit of bankers. Every person that is jailed represents a bond.

What the public don’t know is that your Federal and State “Statutes” are Bonds or Obligations of Record and are represented in the courtroom by the Recognizance Bond, which is a Bond of Record or Obligation for the payment of debt.

A condensed version of what is going on is that the Corporation of Corrections of America (CCA) as a corporation, creates or issues stock certificates based on prison population, goods or chattel as they are called in commercial law. The underwriter is the one who buys the stock from the Issuer the CCA with intent to resell it to the public or an entity or person, which is usually an investment banker.

The investment banker purchases all or part of the shares of the stock for resale to the public in the form of newly issued investment securities based on the shares of the stock.

Brokerage Houses and Insurance Companies Bid on the Investment Securities with a Bid Bond issued by the The General Service Administration (GSA), the business manager and purchasing agent for the world’s largest customer the U.S. Government.

The Bid Bond is then indemnified by a surety company through Performance and Payment Bonds. The Bid, Performance, and Payment Bonds are then underwritten by the Banks as Investment Securities for resale to the public. The Institutional Holders who own most of the Shares are:

  1. FMR [Fidelity Management Research Corporation 3, 084,024 shares at a value of $109,791,254 dollars.
  2. Legg Mason Inc. 1,235,563 shares valued at $43,986,042 dollars.
  3. Barclays Bank Pic 1, 041,671 shares valued at $37,083,487. There are seventeen more corporations owning various amounts of shares at varying dollar values. These can be viewed by going to http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=CXW.
  4. Turner, Jimmy 13,817 shares as of 23-May-03.
  5. Horne, John R. 5,751 shares as of 29-Jun-04.

As you can see by the above information, this system permeates every fabric of our society. Currently global terrorism is being funded by the prison system and the State’s Retirement Fund go to ­www.DivestTerror.Org this is a 115 page treatise on the Terrorism Investments of the 50 States.

If you want to know the whole scheme of the prison system business, visit: http://freedom-school.com/law/prison_treatise.shtml, in which you will find how, in detail, and very well documented, how every person’s criminal charges and convictions, become a security bond, and sold later as government securities.

That’s why you can’t trust our local, state and federal authorities to find a cure, especially to juvenile crime, because every government entity benefits from it, and those incarcerated are seen as clients, and there is no intention to rehabilitate, since it’s more profitable to keep them committing crimes. That’s why we will continue seeing more prison and less educational facilities built, and teachers being layoff.
Students are a financial burden to the system, while inmates are a financial gain.

Berkeley meets with Native North-Americans from the U.S.-Mexico border

by Juliana Birnbaum Fox

El activista Apache Enrique Madrid discute en una reunión con el Consejo de la Ciudad de Berkeley: sobre los derechos de los indígenas en la frontera de EE.UU. con México. (photo by Juliana Birnbaum Fox)Apache activist Enrique Madrid meets with Berkeley City Council about indigenous rights on the U.S. – Mexico border. (photo by Juliana Birnbaum Fox)

Berkeley City Councilmember Kriss Worthington and Vice Mayor Max Anderson hosted a special reception with three indigenous leaders from the U.S. Ð Mexico border last week, where they discussed ongoing militarization and its impacts. Margo Tamez, Lipan Apache of southeast Texas, Enrique Madrid, Jumano Apache of southwest Texas and Michael Paul Hill, Chiricahua Apache of Arizona shared personal experiences about the construction of a border wall, and disruptions to family, community, religious, cultural and economic structures.

Earlier this year, the Berkeley City Council passed a resolution condemning the federal decision to commit over $1.2 billion toward construction of a border wall.

“The border wall will have devastating consequences on the environment, economy and on human lives, not just around the border area, but across the country,” noted Councilmember Worthington.

Since the passage of this resolution, opponents of the border wall have gained support from various other cities and counties.

Vice Mayor Max Anderson introduced the visitors, commenting that Berkeley was proud to oppose the wall, which “is not just bricks, mortar and surveillance cameras, but a symbolic effort to divide people targeting those with the smallest capacity to resist.”

Berkeley’s stance is spreading to other cities and towns,” said Enrique Madrid, indigenous community member, land owner in Redford, Texas and archaeological steward for the state’s Historical Commission. “State laws can be passed that would create a legal obstacle to federal military interventions.”

It was in Redford that a U.S. Marine shot and killed 18-year-old Esequiel Hernandez, herding his sheep near his home in 1997.

“We had hoped he would be the last United States citizen and the last Native American to be killed by troops,” Madrid said.

Margo Tamez, an activist, poet and scholar, pointed out that the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, passed this year, now guarantees the right of native people to their traditional territories. “We are not a people of walls. It is ­against our culture to have walls. The Earth and the River go together. We must be with the river. We must be with this land. We were born for this land.”

Tamez’ mother, Dr. Eloisa Garcia Tamez, was told that she would be taken to court and her lands seized by eminent domain if she didn’t allow surveys for the US/Mexico border-wall onto her property.

The proposed wall will have devastating consequences on the local environment sand will result in landowners and farmers losing their land and access to river water for irrigation,” Worthington wrote in his recommendation to the City Council. “It will also negatively affect the relationship between the US and Mexico as well as to indigenous nations.”

The Latin American model

by the El Reportero’s news services

Fernando LugoFernando Lugo

The decision by the new President of Paraguay, Fernando Lugo, to appoint Joseph Stiglitz as his chief economic adviser is another signal that most of South America is moving onto a new economic track.

The obvious parallel was Bolivia’s decision in the late 1980s and early 1990s to rely on Jeffrey Sachs, then a fashionable development economist, to deregulate its economy.

Sachs was a keen proponent of the so-called Washington Consensus, which favored deregulation on a large scale and recommended only minimal state participation in the economy.

Bolivia’s Morales sets date for constitutional vote

President Evo Morales passed a supreme decree on August 28 establishing 7 December as the date for a national referendum on the new constitution.

The announcement represents a major breakthrough in Morales’s two-and-a-half year struggle to get a new constitution approved.

It shows that the government feels sufficiently buoyed by the results of the 10 August recall referendum – in which Morales received an overwhelming 67 percent of the vote, winning in 95 of the country’s 112 provinces – to abandon attempts at dialogue with the opposition prefects who have emerged as the main obstacle to Morales’ reform efforts.

Prefects defy Morales in Bolivia

Evo MoralesEvo Morales

Five opposition prefects from Santa Cruz, Beni, Pando, Tarija and Chuquisaca announced on August 27 that they would not permit a referendum on the constitution to take place in their departments.

The declaration by the prefects is likely to undermine their position further in their ongoing battle with the government of President Evo Morales.

The decision was announced at a meeting of the opposition prefects’ bloc, Consejo Nacional Democrático, held in Villa Montes, Tarija and followed an ultimatum issued by Morales the previous day that if the prefects continued to defy attempts at dialogue, he would call the referendum on the draft constitution by supreme decree to speed up the process.

Uribe squares up to Supreme Court and Liberals as parapolitical scandal deepens

Relations between Colombia’s President Alvaro Uribe and the supreme court took a sharp turn for the worse this week after revelations emerged in the press that two senior presidential advisers had received two emissaries from the top paramilitary leader, Don Berna, in the presidential palace. Uribe defended his advisers on the grounds that the supreme court was “trafficking in false witnesses.” He also took a pot shot at the leader of the opposition Partido Liberal (PL), César Gaviria. Mutual mudslinging ensued. The upshot is that the opposition is refusing to discuss political and judicial reforms which Uribe sent to Congress late on August 26.

Honduras opts for Alba

Traditionally one of the US’ most steadfast allies in Central America, Honduras would appear to be shifting its allegiances after President Manuel Zelaya announced plans to join the Venezuelan-led trade and integration initiative, Alternativa Bolivariana de las Américas (Alba).

Honduras signed up to Petrocaribe, Venezuela’s oil-supply pact in February [RC-08-03]. Zelaya has also upped his anti-US rhetoric, in a manner reminiscent of US bête noire, President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela. The president’s proposal to join Alba has yet to be ratifi ed by Congress and has proved divisive within the country. (Latin News contributed to this report).

Barack Obama’s strategy to gain Hispanic vote

by Jon Higuera

Barack ObamaBarack Obama

Cuahubtemoc “Temo” Figueroa has worked on many political campaigns during his career but h is ro/e for f he Obama cam paign is his most prominent. As the Latino Vote Director for the Democratic presidential candidate, his job is convincing Latino voters that Obama is the right man for the job. His background includes that of staffer to the late Congressman George Brown, who during his time was dean of the California delegation, serving as policy communications director for the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), and most recently, assistant political director for AFSCME, a public union representing government workers.

On a Sunday afternoon from campaign offices in Chicago, Figueroa discussed with Jonathan Higuera, former editor of Hispanic Link Weekly Report, Obama’s strategy to garner the Latino vote.

Jon Higuera: How do Latinos fit info Obama’s strategy to win thee presidency?

Temo Figueroa: The way we believe can win this race is by doing a few things. One is to expand the playing field. The last few cycles, the way it has worked: is the Democrats go to bed at night praying they will get Florida or Ohio to reach 270 electoral votes needed to win. We decided to create new paths to 270. That entails playing in a lot of states that have gone Republican in the last few cycles. We have ads running in 17 states that have gone Republican in the past, some since 1964. We’re in states like Virginia, Georgia, Iowa, North Dakota, Alaska, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Florida and Ohio.

We also have to expand the voting electorate. This campaign is focused like a laser beam on voter registration.

Historically campaigns have relied on other groups to do that but we in the Obama campaign are doing that. We believe the result will be the largest voter turnout in history.

Cuauhtemoc 'Temo' FigueroaCuauhtemoc ‘Temo’ Figueroa

That’s the mega picture. So where do Latinos fit? In the battleground of battleground states – New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado and Florida – they all have a high percentage of Latinos that vote. I hose elections have been incredibly close historically. !f we increase the amount of Latinos voting, it could make a difference.

JON: What is the on-the-ground strategy for registering more Latino voters?

TEMO: When it comes to voter registration, there are no secret weapons. It takes lots of volunteers, lots
of staff and people willing to go door to door. We have a large number of people will-

ing to give of their time to get this man elected.

Five months ago, we put out a call on the Internet for volunteers. We didn’t know what we’d get. Over 10,000 people applied. We picked 3,600 that we sent to 17 states.

JON: What will be the messages your candidate will use to appeal to Latinos?

TEMO: With a few exceptions, it’s not very dif-

ferent than the messages for all voters. The economy, jobs, how to pay for health insur-

ance. In some cases, these issues are more pronounced among Latinos. When there’s a mortgage crisis, who suffers the most? There were a lot of shysters preying on Hispanic communities. That’s a huge issue.Then, there are issues of particular importance to Latinos, especially in the Southwest, like comprehensive immigration reform.

People want to know what’s going to be done. We re hearing lots of rhetoric hyperbole from both sides on that issue but nothing is being done. Obama has said in front of Latino audiences and white audiences that will he fi ght for comprehensive immigration reform in his fi rst year as president.

He talks about border security fi rst and foremost and no one will jump to the front of the line, but he’s addressing that issue.

Also the Iraq war resonates higher among Latinos than in most other communities. We’ll say let’s put an end to this war and bring home our people.

JON: The campaign recently announced it is devoting $20 million focused on the Latino electorate. How and where will this funding be spent?

TEMO: A majority will be used on general market TV and radio in both English and Spanish. But it will also be spent on campaign literature in Spanish and bilingual, online organizing efforts, hiring of staff, training programs for grassroots organizers in Spanish and English, developing precinct leaders in battleground states and voter registration efforts.

What it’s demonstrating is we are fighting hard for every vote. We’re out to earn Latino votes in battle ground states. I’m proud of the training: programs we have going in these states.

JON: How will you win over Hillary supporters, many of whom are still harboring resentments that their candidate didn’t receive the nomination?

TEMO: One of the outcomes from having long primary contest was the feelings that supporters of candidates had toward their candidate. It’s expected. People worked years and had longtime relationships with the Senator from New York. But I’ve also seen the vast majority of her supporters, now supporting Barack. Among Latinos, Antonio Villaragoisa has been campaigning hard for us. Henry Cisneros, Hilda Solis and Nydia Velázquez and Jos6 Serrano were big Hillary supporters now on board with Barack.

My job has been to reach out to each and every one and listen to their comments and suggestions. They’ve done an amazing job in the primary and we’ve incorporated some of their strategies into our campaign. There are pockets (of resistance). It’s understandable some people are not quite there. But the vast majority is. The Senator herself is campaigning for us in Las Vegas and New Mexico.

JON: How are you addressing concerns that Obama has never visited Mexico or Latin America?

TEMO: After he won the nomination, the first trip he took was to Florida where he spoke to the Cuban American National Foundation. It was a comprehensive speech on Latin America. He didn’t just talk about Cuba but all of Latin America. He showed incredible knowledge of Latin America.

The speech is on our web site.

JON: Do you expect him to make a visit to any of those countries prior to the election?

Due to lack of space we were not able to provide you with the endind of this article – five paragraphs.

­

Boxing

August 28 (Thursday), 2008 In Brescia, Italy

  • Fabio Tuiach (21-1) vs. Walter Palacios (20-13-2).
  • Rodrigo Bracco (6-1) vs. Roberto Priore (4-3).

August 29 (Friday), 2008 At Casino Rama, Rama, Canada

  • Steve Molitor (27-0) vs. Ceferino Labarda (18-0).
  • (The Ring Magazine #4 Jr. Featherweight vs. Unranked) (IBF Jr. Featherweight belt) Martin Lindsay (12-0) vs. Alberto Garza (16-4-1).
  • Grzegorz Kielsa (6-0) vs. Arthur Cook (13-3-2).

In Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Jeffery Mathebula (21-1-2) vs. Julio Zarate (26-4-1).
  • Malcolm Klassen (22-4-2) vs. Manuel Medina (67-15-1).

At The New Alhambra, Philadelphia, PA

  • Mike Jones (14-0) vs. TBA.

August 30 (Saturday), 2008 At Ruben Rodriguez Coliseum, Bayamon, Puerto Rico

  • (PPV) Ivan Calderon (31-0) vs. Hugo Cazares (26-4-1) (For The Ring Magazine World Jr. Flyweight Championship) (WBO Jr. Flyweight belt).

At The Cebu City Waterfront Hotel, Cebu City, The Philippines

  • Rey Bautista (25-1) vs. TBA.
  • (The Ring Magazine #9 Jr. Featherweight vs. Unranked) Jason Pagara (14-1) vs. TBA.

At The Metro Auto Arena, Tampere, Finland

  • Amin Asikainen (24-1) vs. TBA.

September 5 (Friday), 2008 At Nöjesfabriken Arena, Karlstad, Sweden

  • Joey Abell (20-2) vs. Al Cole (34-14-3).
  • Allan Vester (27-6-1) vs. TBA.
  • Reidar Walstad (17-2-2) vs. TBA.
  • Anna Ingman (4-0) vs. Olivia Fonseca (2-1-2).

Panel on youth and guns at the Commonwealth Club

by Juliana Birnbaum Fox

873

At Youth and Guns: Stopping Violence Before It Starts, a panel of key players who work to reduce youth violence in California will discuss how to prevent homicide, the leading cause of death in 15 to 19 year-old Californians. They will ex- plore how a community can work to keep young people out of trouble and how to make California a safer state. On Monday, Sept. 8, at 5:30 p.m. at the Club offi ce, 595 Market St., 2nd fl oor, San Francisco The event is FREE for Members and Students and $18 for Non-Members. To buy tickets call 415-597-6705 or register at www.commonwealthclub.org.

Eviction Defense Collaborative Hosts Annual Awards

The EDC, a legal assistance provider for San Francisco tenants facing homelessness, will be hosting its Annual Awards Event on Tuesday, Sept. 9, from 5: 30 – 8:00 p.m. Wine and appetizers will be served, and live music by The Shut-Ins will be provided. At Morrison & Foerster, 425 Market Street in San Francisco. $20 suggested donation. For more information call 415-947-0797 x115.

Party to raise funds for Nicaraguans affected by Hurricane Felix

Son de Caña, a San Francisco-based salsa band, will be playing at an event to raise funds for the people in the Atlantic Coast in Nicaragua affected by Hurricane Felix. The event will be held during the celebration of Nicaraguan independence from Spain. There will be typical Nicaraguan food: Vigorón, Gallo Pinto, and from the Atlantic coast: Rondón. The special attraction of the day will be the competition of Palo de Mayo. On Sept 14 from 1:00 to 7:00 p.m. at Club Roccapulco, 3140 Mission Street in San Francisco. Tickets are $10 advance at $15 at the door. For information call 510-459-5950.

Shakespear in the ParkShakespear in the Park

Free Shakespeare in the Park’s latest offering: Pericles

Although a runaway hit in the Bard’s time, Pericles is now rarely produced.

The story centers around a young man, Pericles, who as a young man embarks on an epic journey that leads him from a tragic shipwreck to a joyful marriage and from the loss of his beloved daughter to a surprising reunion.

Free Shakespeare fans should arrive about an hour early to secure the best seating and bring a blanket, cushion and/or low-back folding chair for additional comfort while viewing the performance. Snacks and beverages are available and audience members are invited to bring their own picnics as well. See Pericles live in the Presidio Main Post Lawn (between Graham Street and Keyes Avenue) from Aug. 30 through Sept. 21. Saturdays at 7:30 p.m., Sundays and Labor Day Monday at 2:30 p.m.

For more information visit www.sfshakes.org or call the information line at 415-865-4434.

­

Alma Awards bring big-name winners

by Antonio Mejías-Rentas

América FerreraAmérica Ferrera

TRIPLE TRIUMPH: América Ferrera and Ugly Betty were the big winners at this year’s NCLR Alma Awards ceremony.

The actress won the unannounced (and Chevy sponsored) Entertainer of the Year award, while her hit ABC show took awards for outstanding performance by a Latino-led ensemble in a television series and outstanding directing (for Linda Mendoza).

The ceremony, hosted by executive producer Eva Longoria-Parker, was taped Aug. 17 in Pasadena, Calif. It will air Sept, 12 on ABC to coincide with national Hispanic Heritage Month celebrations.

The ceremony included lengthy tributes to special award winners Shakira (Humanitarian award from Edward James Olmos) and Linda Ronstadt (Trailblazer award, given by Placido Domingo). The Ronstadt tribute featured performances by Wynona Judd, Lucero and Mariachi Los Camperos.

Other special achievement winners were fashion designer Narciso Rodriguez; director Kenny Ortega, for High School Musical 2; and Spanish-langlanguaga film La misma luna.

Eva LongoriaEva Longoria

Other winners were TV actors Judy Reyes (for Scrubs), Olmos (Battlestar Galactica) and Charlie Sheen, who accepted his award for Two and a Half Men as “my superhero alter ego Carlos Estevez.” After joking about his lack of knowledge of the Spanish-language, he dedicated the win to his Spanish grandfather “who brought the Estevez clan 100 years ago and sikked it on Hollywood .”

The Almas are given to recognize Latino visibility in entertainment media.

SPECIAL TRIBUTE: The Latin Recording Academy has named Gloria Estefan as its 2008 Person of the Year.

Gloria y Emilio EstefanGloria y Emilio Estefan

The Grammy-winning recording artist, who along with husband Emilio Estefan defined the Miami sound of the 1980s, will receive her tribute at the organization’s annual fundraiser dinner, to be held Nov. 12 in Houston.

A day later, the Academy will hand out its Latin Grammy Awards at the city’s Toyota Center. Nominations are to be announced next month in Los Angeles.

FULLY FIT: Just months after giving birth to twins, Jennifer López is training for a triathlon and blogging about the experience for the next two weeks.

J-Lo will compete in her first triathlon, a fundraiser event for Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, an organization she has supported for several years.

She talks about it in the September issue of Self magazine, already in newstands, that features her on the cover. The blog can be found on the magazine’s website. Hispanic Link.