Tuesday, July 23, 2024
Home Blog Page 507

Mexico in danger of collapse, says U.S. Army

­­by David Blair, Diplomatic Editor

The U.S. could intervene in Mexico

No more separation of families, stop the raids, asked demonstrators at the steps of the SF City Hall­
US troops storm Chapultepec in 1847
PHOTO COURTESY OF CASAIMPERIAL.ORG

The U.S. may be force-d to intervene in Mexico to prevent the country’s “rapid and sudden collapse” at the hands of organized crime and drug carteles, according to the US army

A report on the “Joint Operating Environment”, compiled by the army’s high command, places Mexico alongside Pakistan as a possible failed state of the future. The United States, which shares a 2,000 mile border with Mexico, would be the obvious destination for massive refugee flows if its neighbor descended into civil war.

President Felipe Calderón has deployed Mexico’s against organized crime. This battle against four major drug cartels, along with a myriad of local syndicates, claimed the lives of 5,367 members of the security forces or suspected criminals last year alone.

“Two large and important states bear consideration for rapid and sudden collapse: Pakistan and Mexico,” reads the US army’s report.

“The Mexican possibility may seem less likely, but the government, its politicians, police and judicial infrastructure are all under sustained assault and pressure by criminal gangs and drug cartels. How that internal conflict turns out over the next several years will have a major impact on the stability of the Mexican state.

“Mexico, with a population of 110 million, provides America with more migrants than any other country. It also lies astride the crucial smuggling routes linking the US with the drug-growing areas of South America, notably Colombia, which remains the world’s biggest source of cocaine.

If Mexico became a failed state, millions would flee across the northern border and organized crime gangs would have a secure base from which to penetrate America. This could leave Washington with little choice but to intervene, possibly by military means.

“Any descent by Mexico into chaos would demand an American response based on the serious implications for homeland security alone,” says the report.Mexico’s crime gangs have retaliated for Calderón’s offensive by targeting members of the security forces for murder. Dozens of soldiers have been beheaded. Many ordinary police officers and security officials accept bribes from the drug rings. This corruption,which may reach into the highest levels of the government itself, is a crucial factor obstructing Calderón’s campaign. Ultimately,it may also have the effect of destroying the state itself.

The U.S. Army’s report stresses that countries can collapse very quickly, pointing to the example of Yugoslavia which broke up during the civil wars of 1991 – 95. “The collapse of Yugoslavia into a chaotic tangle of warring nationalities suggests how uddenly and catastrophically state collapse can happen – in this case a state which had hosted the 1984 Winter Olympics at Sarajevo, and which then quickly became the epicenter of the ensuing civil war.”

Calderón won Mexico’s presidency by a tiny margin of less than one per cent during a controversial election held in July 2006. Despite this slender mandate,he has made the fight against organized crime the central goal of his leadership.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/centralamericaandthecaribbean/mexico/ 4271720/Mexico-in-danger-of-collapse-says-US-army.html

Richardson withdrawal stuns community

by Charlie Ericksen

WASHINGTON, D.C. Ñ Hispanic leaders are absorbing New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson’s decision to decline President
elect Barack Obama’s nomination as Secretary of Commerce with a mix of sorrow and disbelief.

The reality show scenario of a black president circled by a strong Hispanic supporting cast hit a snag even before Obama could take the oath.

Both men are progeny of international mixed marriages, Obama with a Kenyan father, Richardson with a Mexican mother. Both built reputations as public servants of conviction and strength, of contagious confidence who together could inspire this nation to believe in itself again.

“An individual of great integrity and commitment,” Dialogue on Diversity president Cristina Caballero described Richardson to Hispanic Link News Service, sharing a common reaction to his retreat. She singled out his support on women’s issues when he served 14 years in Congress. “When our organization started nearly 20 years ago, he was one of the first two leaders to step forward.”

The morning after Richardson’s Jan. 4 announcement,the Washington Post’s headline story called his withdrawal “the first visible crack in what had been one of the smoothest presidential transitions in modern history.”

In its lead editorial, the Post credited hi with making “the right decision” and questioned the Obama transition team’s failure to do its homework.

The Post editorial stated that while Richardson’s confirmation “would inevitably have been delayed and the controversy an unnecessary distraction for the new Obama administration,…it’s unclear whether the political ground simply shifted on them in the wake of the (Illinois Gov. Rod) Blogojevich arrest. ” Blogojevich is accused of inviting cash offers in return for appointment to Obama’s vacated U.S. Senate seat. Political realities, not people, drive the news machines in this town.

A federal probe was initiated this past summer into whether Richardson’s offi ce or a political action committee he helped form
encouraged a New Mexico state agency five years ago to hire a California company whose president made contributions totaling $100,000 to two Political Action Committees associated with Richardson.

Speculation had been building in Washington that a “pay-to-play” allegation involving a Richardson supporter could turn his confirmation hearing into a media feeding frenzy. Kindled by a growing public distrust of federal leadership, it was ignited by revelations concerning Blagojevich, alleged to have put the U.S. Senate seat being relinquished by the president-elect up for bid.

None of the Hispanic organizational leaders Hispanic Link News Service contacted expect Richardson to end up in jail. He has been charged with nothing, convicted of nothing. Almost to the person, Hispanic leaders accept his “unequivocal”statement that he and his Administration “have acted properly in all matters and this investigation will bear out that fact.”

The danger is a political one. Had he chosen to tough out his conformation hearing, the fl ack would have sliced up not just his own
image. The effectiveness of Obama’s administration would take shrapnel, too.The pending investigation, Richardson said,“promises to extend for several weeks or, perhaps,even months.”

Such an eventuality could impede Obama’s quick-start response to the national economic crisis and defl ect attention from other matters of serious concern.

Obama accepted Richardson’s withdrawal with expected deep regret, stating that he looked forward to “future service to our
country and in my administration.”

Hispanics continue to express confi dence in Richardson’s ethical behavior.

Obama’s two remaining Hispanic nominees on his 20-member Cabinet Ñ U.S.Rep. Hilda Solís of California as Secretary of Labor and Senator Ken Salazar of Colorado as Secretary of Interior Ñ confi dently await their Senate confi rmations.

Intent on making Obama keep his promise to the Hispanic community to create a diverse, inclusive administration, members of the infl uential National Hispanic Leadership

Agenda have already conferred and forwarded to Obama’s transition team the names of half a dozen seasoned, highly qualifi ed individuals as candidates to head the Commerce Department.

John Trasviña, the NHLA’s Washingtonsavvy chairman and president of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, told Hispanic Link News Service that the group identifi ed several individuals with strong credibility in the community who will receive widespread support if they’re nominated. Hispanic Link.

Warning about the split of the United States in three parts

by Marvin J. Ramírez

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin ­Ramírez­­­

I­n addition to an imminent collapse of the dollar – and the birth of the new currency called Amero, which will replace the dollar – along with the world financial system, millions of North Americans are also aware of the warnings coming from two former U.S. Secretary of States, Collin Powell and Madeleine Albright, and vice president-elect Joe Biden, just before the November Presidential election. They warned that something of great magnitude is going to happen in the U.S., either days before or after the swearing in of the new president of the United States. And nobody knows what it is.

But to hear a warning about the end of the United States, is something to laugh about, or to consider a joke, as it happened when I was talking over dinner with a local restaurant owner in San Francisco.

“I can believe anything, but not the split of the U.S.,” said Amadeo González, a local restaurant owner, very seriously.

But for Russian academic Igor Panarin, who for a decade has been predicting the split of the U.S., is not a joke, according to a Wall Street Journal article on Dec. 29. The article describes in details how the United States will be split in three portions, and he warns that the outlook is dire. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html

According to the article, Panarin predicted the collapse of the Soviet Union 13 years ahead of time and is now warning any American citizen who will listen:

“Based upon forecasts on classified data supplied to him by FAPSI analysts, he predicts that economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis in the U.S. When the going gets tough, he says, wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede from the union. Social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow. The U.S. will then split along ethnic lines, and foreign powers will move in.”

“Few took his argument — that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. — very seriously,” says the article.

Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations,” the article says.

“There’s a 55-45 percent chance right now that disintegration will occur,”he says. “One could rejoice in that process,” he adds,poker-faced. “But if we’re talking reasonably, it’s not the best scenario — for Russia.” Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.

Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline,and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says,the U.S. will break into six pieces — with Alaska reverting to Russian control.

Things to come will affect our lives. Most North Americans continue living their lives based on their Fox News, CNN, PBS,Univision and Telemundo broadcast, which project life as very normal.

But don’t forget this,most mainstream media is now owned by a few international conglomerates, thanks to the Bushes administrations, who got rid of the laws that regulated and helped prevent the media monopoly that we have now.

The media now is nothing more than the government’s mouthpiece. Have you ever wondered why CBS, NBC, ABC, etc., are the only holders in course of the airwaves licenses for so many decades and never rotate ownership? Have you ever wondered why most of them give you almost the same news at 6? They are supposedly owned by humanity, but in the U.S. they belong – through licenses to certain interest groups

TRANSITION WATCH: Ken Salazar to head Department of Interior

President-elect Barack Obama has topped previous administrations with the number of Hispanic officials nam­ed, according to White House chief of staff-designate Rahm Emanuel, as reported in Politico. “[W]e have more Hispanics in senior positions in this White House than under either President Bush or President Clinton,” he said.

Besides the better-known C­abinet appointments of the past, Emanuel based much of what he meant on Latino Assistants and Deputy Assistants to the President at any one time.

Otherwise, it looked like slow-motion to high expectations until Dec. 17 when U.S. Senator Ken Salazar (D-Colo.) was nominated as Secretary of the Interior. Salazar has been a leader on Capitol Hill on renewable energy, health care, farming and rural community issues. George W. BushKen Salazar ­ ­If confirmed, he will head a department with more than 70,000 employees and an annual budget exceeding $10 billion that manages and conserves most federallyowned land and administers programs related to indigenous populations. He has served in the Senate since 2005.

On Dec. 15, Obama named Nancy Sutley, of Argentine descent, as his choice to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality. (See Political Poop. page 2.)

As yet, no announcement has been forthcoming about the Secretary of Agriculture Cabinet post. U.S. Rep. John Salazar (DColo.), Ken’s brother, with strong backing by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, had been reported in contention. However, one Salazar in the Cabinet may be enough forthis administration. by the El Reportero’s news.

After being appointed to the powerful House Appropriations Committee, John Salazar virtually removed himself from contention.On Dec. 11, the Associated Press reported him saying he never asked to become agriculture secretary in the fi rst place and was happy joining the Appropriations Committee.

The name of Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.) has been bandied as likely to become U.S. Trade Representative.Reps. Marcy Kaptur of Ohio and Kendrick Meek of Florida and Rep. Hilda Solís of California indicated interest in replacing him as the fifth-ranking member in House leadership. But on Dec.16 Becerra bowed out of Trade Rep contention, deciding to stay on the House leadership ladder and on the important Ways and Means Committee, saying he was eager to get to work “in the People’s House just down the street from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The clock is ticking. I’m ready to go!”

That kind of enthusiasm is welcomed among the Democrats, but it can also cause, shall we say, issues,as happened last week when Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrión Jr., 47, a Democrat of Puerto Rican descent, was being mentioned as a possible nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

Rumors intensifi ed after Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa declared himself out of the running for any administration position. He said he wanted to continue at the helm in his West Coast city instead.

A funny thing happened on the way to Carrión’s “nomination.” On Dec. 5,he told some Yale students that U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton , now Secretary of State-designate, had called to congratulate him on his selection for a Cabinet post.

The remark came dur ing a question-andanswer period following Carrión’s lecture on Latino-Jewish relations, an event sponsored by Yale Hillel and La Casa Cultural. Intended to be “off the record,” it was reported in The Yale Daily News and attested to by ten students. Evidently, he thought the anecdote would not go beyond the room.

Carrión has been rumored in line for one of several positions, most recently the newly created Offi ce of Urban Policy.

A similar goof concerning Philadelphia lawyer Nelson Díaz, who is/was a HUD “mentionable.”

He told the Philadelphia Inquirer that he had received a call from “the transition team” about a job. The Washington Post
reported Díaz as saying, “If it’s high enough, I might be interested in looking at it.”

So far, there have been no formal statements or announcements by the transition team yet about Carrión or Díaz. However, on Dec.13 President-elect Barack Obama nominated NewYork City’s housing commissioner Shaun Donovan to lead HUD. Hispanic Link

 

 

San Francisco mass march for Palestine, manifestacion!

by the El Reportero’s staff

The American Indian Movement (AIM)-WEST calls out to all our relations, allies and supporters to join the marches; form a contingent
in every city, town or village, with flags, drummers and singers, dancers, banners, Elders and youth, to identify who we are, and that we stand in solidarity with the heroic peoples of Gaza!

AIM-WEST, will have a speaker to express the sentiment of the American Indian community, and call to end the killing and bombing of the people Gaza, in Palestine. We will also have spiritual advisors who can also convey words of healing and strength for both our peoples.

Saturday, Jan. 10, 2009 at Civic Center in San Francisco.For info call 415-577-1492. www.aimwest.info

A convening on the economic recession and the impact on the Bay Area arts community.

As a community and as individual arts organizations and artists, we have all begun to feel the impact of a troubled economy. How it will play out remains a question. Rather than wait for this financial impact to crescendo and then react individually, we can work collectively to build a consensus that will help guide our decision-making in the months ahead.

Please join us for a presentation and conversation with Jeremy Nowak, PhD, followed by a series of group discussions focusing on strategies for building partnerships and addressing the economic downturn as a community.

Monday, Jan. 12, from 3 to 6 p.m. (doors open at 2:30 p.m.), at Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, 701 Mission St., SF. RSVP by Friday
(1/9/09). Event is free and open to the public.

Sizzling Soledad Bar rio & Noche Flamenca perform at Zellerbach Hall.

Focusing on the three el ements of fl amenco—cante(song), toque (guitar) and baila (dance)—co-founder and artistic director Martin Santangelo and his celebrated star, Soledad Barrio, have perfecte­d the ancient art form. The husband and wife duo founded the ensemble in 1993, and it has quickly become one of the most sought-after dance companies in the world.

Tickets for Soledad Barrio & Noche Flamenca on Friday & Saturday, January 23 & 24 at 8:00 p.m. in Zellerbach Hall are priced at $24.00, $36.00 and $48.00.Tickets are available through the Cal Performances Ticket Offi ce at Zellerbach Hall; at (510) 642-9988 to charge by phone; at www.calperformances.org;and at the door. Half-price tickets are available for purchase by UC Berkeley students.

9th Annual Latino Education Summit

Hispanic Business Education and Training and the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Alameda County spearhead a diverse partnership of East Bay businesses, corporations, educational institutions and community agencies in presenting this highly successful event. The summit provides important information to college-bound students and their parents on how to successfully navigate the educational system.

The summit features distinguished speakers, a resource fair and workshops in English and Spanish on topics such as applying to college, financial aid, parental involvement and life on campus. Everything is free, including registration, light breakfast, lunch and parking.A drawing for two free computers and other prizes will take place at the end of the program, followed by lunch.

High school students, parents, teachers, school administrators, counselors, and business and community leaders are encouraged to attend.The event is open to all. The program takes place on the California State University Campus, Saturday, January 24th from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. For conference information and on-line registration contact: 510.885.3516
or www.csueastbay.edu/latinosummit.

Arts and entertainment figures gone in 2008

by Antonio Mejías-Rentas

GONE IN 2008: Sculptor Robert Graham, who created massive bronze works for civic monuments around the country, died Dec. 27 at 70. The Mexico-born and California-raised artist had been a­iling for six months and died of an undisclosed illness at a Santa Monica, Calif., hospital.

He died with family, including his wife, actress Anjelica Huston, at his side.

Graham’s best known public works include the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial in Washington, D.C., and sculptures depicting
boxer Joe Louis in Detroit and jazz musicians Charlie Parker and Duke Ellington,in Kansas City and New York, respectively.

In his adopted city of Los Angeles, Graham’s many public works include his 1984 Olympic Gateway and the massive Great Bronze Doors of the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, a 25-ton entryway completed over 5 years by about 150 artists.

Graham was born in Mexico City in 1938 and took his widowed mother’s maiden name; with her he migrated to San José, Calif., where he studied and lived before eventually settling in the Venice beach community of Los Angeles.

Other prominent Latino artists and performers who died in 2008:

• Mexican playwright Emilio Carballido, whose Rosa de dos aromas and many other plays were often performed in the United States. Jan. 11 at 78.

• Rafael Tufiño, Puerto Rico’s best-known 20th century painter. Jan. 13 at 85.

• New York-born actor Perry López, remembered for performances in Chinatown and Star Trek. Jan. 14 at 78.

• Cuban bass player and arranger Israel “Cachao” López, whose musical innovations helped create the mambo. After living in semi-retirement in Miami, his career was revived in the 1990s with a film and a series of recordings produced by actor Andy García and he continued to perform until weeks before his passing.Jan. 22 at 89.

• Spanish novelist and screenwriter Rafael Azcona, whose Belle Epoque was an Oscar winner. March 23 at 81.

SUMAC

• Cuban-American actor,director and producer Mel Ferrer. Feb. 2 at 90.

.• Spanish dancer Guillermina Martínez Cabrejas, best known as Mariemma. June 10 at 91.

• Mexican musician Ángel Tavira, who never acted before winning an award at the Cannes Film Festival, for El violín. June 30 at 83.

• Brazilian singer-songwriter Dorival Caymmi. Aug. 16 at 94.

• Brazilian screenwriter Leopoldo Serran, whose films Doña Flor e seus doi maridos and Bye Bye Brazil were international hits. Aug. 20 at 66.

• Mexican-American cartoonist and producer Bill Meléndez, who animated the Peanuts strip. Sept. 2 at 91.

• Cuban filmmaker Humberto Solás. Sept. 17 at 66.

• Mexican screenwriter and actress Berta Domínguez.Oct. 9 at 87.

• Peruvian soprano Yma Sumac. Nov. 1 at 86.

• Mexican actress María Elena Márquez, star of her country’s Golden Age of Cinema. Nov. 11 at 83.

• Chilean painter Pablo Domínguez. Nov. 25 at 46.

• Cuban composer Harold Gramatges. Dec. 16 at 90. Hispanic Link.

Los clasificados trabajan. Anuncia lo que vendes. Anuncia si necesitas encontrar empleados. Llama ahora mismo al 415-648-3711

Decision could prevent unducumented from fighting deportation in court

compiled by the El Reportero staff

In a decision that set the tone to end the rights of undocumented immigrants to have their day in court, Attorney General Michael Mukasey unraveled decades of legal precedent guaranteeing due process to people facing deportation.

According to an American Immigration Law Foundat­ion (AILF) communiqué,on Jan. 7 the Attorney General declared that henceforth,immigrants, asylum seekers,and all others in removal(deportation) proceedings do not have any right under statute or the Constitution to representation by a lawyer before they can be ordered deported. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and most federal courts have for decades operated under the premise that immigrants DO have such rights. The Attorney General has reversed many years of precedent and operation by simply declaring it so.

The Attorney General said that because there is no legal or constitutional right to a lawyer, immigrants do not have the right to legal counsel and thus no right to complain or request a new hearing when their lawyer is incompetent or fraudulent. It adds, it attempts to ameliorate the harsh impact of his revolutionary action by allowing reopening of cases in certain highly extreme circumstances, but his declaration will wipe out the rights of all but a handful of people with one stroke of his pen.

“We are outraged by this action” said Nadine Wettstein, the Director of AILF’s Legal Action Center. “With this ruling, the Administration is attempting to undermine an immigrant’s right to a fair hearing on whether he should be thrown out of the country. It is yet another in a long line of midnight changes and an example of this Administration’s disregard for fundamental principles of due process of law. It is also part of an ongoing attempt to eviscerate the federal courts’ role in protecting against Constitutional abuses by the immigration agency. We strongly disagree with the Attorney General’s pronouncements and are confi dent that federal courts eventually will reject this action.”

The Attorney General’s decision is Matter of Compean, 24 I & N Dec. 710 (A.G. 2009) is available at
http://www.usdoj.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol24/3632.pdf

The AILF brief is available at http://www.ailf.org/lac/chdocs/IACBrief.pdf.

CaliforniaAttorney General sues to overturn Bush’s rules on Endangered Species Act.

SAN FRANCISCO–California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr.announced that he has fi led suit in federal court to block an “audacious attempt” by the Bush Administration to gut provisions in the Endangered Species Act mandating scientifi c review of federal agency decisions that may threaten endangered species and their habitat.

“The Bush Administration is seeking to gut the Endangered Species Act on its way out the door,” Attorney General Brown said. “This is an audacious attempt to circumvent a time-tested statute that for 35 years has required scientifi c review of proposed federal agency decisions that affect wildlife.”

The new regulations,initially proposed by the Departments of the Interior and Commerce in August 2008 and made final on Dec. 16, largely eliminate a requirement in the Endangered Species Act that mandates scientifi c review of federal agency decisions that might affect endangered and threatened species and their habitats.

The changes allow federal agencies to undertake or permit mining, logging, and other commercial activities on federal land and other
areas without obtaining review or comment from federal wildlife biologists on the environmental effects of such activities.

What’s the white stuff in the bird poop?

by José de la Isla

HOUSTON — On Christmas Eve, political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, 81, passed away of natural causes. He was known for a 1993 article in Foreign Policy magazine that he turned into a book called “Clash of Civilizations and the New World Order.” He claimed conflict after the Cold War would center on cultural rather than ideological differences.

Presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and George H. W. Bush used Huntington’s new world order notion to define the period following the Cold War.

Huntington’s 2004 book, “Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity,” concerned his idea that our identity faced a possible cultural threat from large-scale Latino immigration. The notion was picked up by various ideologues and nativists to justify their prejudices. Some silly gooses out there hysterically took to talk radio, claiming some kind of “re-conquista” was in the works. Get this — they claimed Mexico was retaking parts of the Southwest. I heard Pat Buchanan saying as much on MS-NBC.

Huntington warned trends could “divide the United States into two peoples, two cultures and two languages.” Those who are familiar with the 1968 Kerner report about the riots of the times are familiar with that type of warning: “Our nation is moving toward two societies, one black, one white — separate and unequal.

”Anyone conscious during the past decade knows we are — and always have been — more than two.

It’s important to rehash this because Huntington — Reqiescat in Pace—expressed and inspired more fear than perspective about our national identity.

That became clear after reading “Man Without a Country” by Kurt Vonnegut, first released in 2005, two years before his passing.

There is much to recommend this short 146-page volume. It is a better warning about society and politics.Vonnegut, long thought of as a science-fiction writer and author of such classics as “Slaughterhouse Five” and “Breakfast of Champions,”is really an observer of our times. He was interested in science. He studied anthropology.

Vonnegut co­nfessed, “It was a big mistake for me to take a degree in anthropology.”

It is probably a lucky thing he did. Its mission is to look for differences among groups of humans, unlike politics, which is mostly about leverage for one group over another. Recently I overheard a discussion between two 19-year-old classmates, one black, one white, both in their first year of college. One said her issue was they came from “different cultures.” They were from similar circumstances,socio-economic status.

She meant, I think, that she perceived a difference in someone who was not from her Long Island town, who shared her lifestyle, language inflections and attitudes about popular entertainment.

Differences, yes, but not about culture. It is mostly about how they identify. Some Japanese youth paint their hair bright, outlandish colors and dress in fantasy costumes to identify outside a homogeneous group. Identity can be voluntary and changeable. It is often what is called a meme. It is not prescribed; most culture is.

Here is where Huntington errs. He mistakes people’s identity and turns it into the plot of The Manchurian Candidate. It is not only a mistake to mislead this way but disingenuous. Consequently, many unsuspecting people turned a political situation into cultural superstition and threat.

The lesson? A nationality like ours ought never to become a cult.

Vonnegut says in his book, “Even the simplest jokes are based on tiny twinges of fear.” He asks, “What’s the white stuff in bird poop?”

The answer is “That’s bird poop, too.”

That’s why it’s best to read Huntington as if he were telling jokes.

The laugh’s on those who believed him.

 [José de la Isla writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service. He is author of The Rise of Hispanic Political Power (Archer Books). E-mail joseisla3@yahoo.com.] ©2008

 

There are two United States: one is illiterate

by Chris Hedges

November 16, 2008 “Truthdig” — – We live in two Americas. One America, now the minority, functions in a print-based, literate world. It can cope with complexity and has the intellectual tools to separate illusion from truth. The other America, which constitutes the majority, exists in a non-reality-based belief system. This America, dependent on skillfully manipulated images for information, has severed itself from the literate,print-based culture. It cannot differentiate between lies and truth. It is informed by simplistic, childish narratives and clichés. It is thrown into confusion by ambiguity, nuance and self-reflection. This divide, more than race, class or gender, more than rural or urban, believer or nonbeliever, red state or blue state, has split the country into radically distinct, unbridgeable and antagonistic entities.

There are over 42 million American adults, ­20 percent of whom hold high school diplomas, who cannot read, as well as the 50 million who read at a fourth- or fifth-grade level. Nearly a third of the nation’s population is illiterate or barely literate. And their numbers are growing by an estimated 2 million a year. But even those who are supposedly literate retreat in huge numbers into this image-based existence. A third of high school graduates,along with 42 percent of college graduates, never read a book after they finish school. Eighty percent of the families in the United States last year did not buy a book.

The illiterate rarely vote, and when they do vote they do so without the ability to make decisions based on textual information. American political campaigns, which have learned to speak in the comforting epistemology of images, eschew real ideas and policy for cheap slogans and reassuring personal narratives.Political propaganda now masquerades as ideology.Political campaigns have become an experience.They do not require cognitive or self-critical skills.They are designed to ignite pseudo-religious feelings of euphoria, empowerment and collective salvation.Campaigns that succeed are carefully constructed psychological instruments that manipulate fi ckle public moods, emotions and impulses, many of which are subliminal. They create a public ecstasy that annuls individuality and fosters a
state of mindlessness. They thrust us into an eternal present. They cater to a nation that now lives in a state of permanent amnesia. It is style and story, not content or history or reality, which inform our politics and our lives. We prefer happy illusions. And it works because so much of the American electorate, including those who should know better,blindly cast ballots for slogans, smiles, the cheerful family tableaux, narratives and the perceived sincerity and the attractiveness of candidates. We confuse how we feel with knowledge.

The illiterate and semiliterate, once the campaigns are over, remain powerless.They still cannot protect their children from dys
functional public schools.They still cannot understand predatory loan deals,the intricacies of mortgage papers, credit card agreements and equity lines of credit that drive them into foreclosures and bankruptcies. They still struggle with the most basic chores of daily life from reading instructions on medicine bottles to fi lling out bank forms, car loan documents and unemployment benefi t and insurance papers. They watch helplessly and without comprehension as hundreds of thousands of jobs are shed. They are hostages to brands. Brands come with images and slogans.Images and slogans are all they understand. Many eat at fast food restaurants not only because it is cheap but because they can order from pictures rather than menus.And those who serve them,also semi-literate or illiterate, punch in orders on cash registers whose keys are marked with symbols and pictures. This is our brave new world.

Political leaders in our post-literate society no longer need to be competent,sincere or honest. They only need to appear to have these qualities. Most of all they need a story, a narrative. The reality of the narrative is irrelevant. It can be completely at odds with the facts. The consistency and emotional appeal of the story are paramount.The most essential skill in political theater and the consumer culture is artifi ce.Those who are best at artifi ce succeed. Those who have not mastered the art of artifi ce fail. In an age of im ages and entertainment, in an age of instant emotional gratifi cation, we do not seek or want honesty. We ask to be indulged and entertained by clichés, stereotypes and mythic narratives that tell us we can be whomever we want to be, that we live in the greatest country on Earth, that we are endowed with superior moral and physical qualities and that our glorious future is preordained, either because of our attributes as Americans or because we are blessed by God or both.

The ability to magnify these simple and childish lies, to repeat them and have surrogates repeat them in endless loops of news cycles, gives these lies the aura of an uncontested truth.We are repeatedly fed words or phrases like yes we can,maverick, change, pro-life,hope or war on terror. It feels good not to think. All we have to do is visualize what we want, believe in ourselves and summon those hidden inner resources,whether divine or national,that make the world conform to our desires. Reality is never an impediment to our advancement.

The Princeton Review analyzed the transcripts of the Gore-Bush debates, the Clinton-Bush-Perot debates of 1992, the Kennedy-Nixon debates of 1960 and the Lincoln Douglas debates of 1858. It reviewed these transcripts using a standard vocabu lary test that indicates the minimum educational stan dard needed for a reader to grasp the text. During the 2000 debates, George W.Bush spoke at a sixth-grade level (6.7) and Al Gore at a seventh-grade level (7.6).In the 1992 debates, Bill Clinton spoke at a seventh-grade level (7.6), while George H.W. Bush spoke at a sixth-grade level (6.8), as did H. Ross Perot (6.3). In the debates between John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon, the candidates spoke in language used by 10th graders. In the debates of Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas the scores were respectively 11.2 and 12.0. In short, today’s political rhetoric is designed to be comprehensible to a 10-year-old child or an adult with a sixth-grade reading level. It is fi tted to this level of comprehension because most Americans speak,think and are entertained at this level. This is why serious fi lm and theater and other serious artistic expression, as well as newspapers and books, are being pushed to the margins of American society. Voltaire was the most famous man of the 18th century. Today the most famous “person” is Mickey Mouse.

In our post-literate world, because ideas are inaccessible, there is a need for constant stimulus. News,political debate, theater, art and books are judged not on the power of their ideas but on their ability to entertain.Cultural products that force us to examine ourselves and our society are condemned as elitist and impenetrable.Hannah Arendt warned that the marketization of culture leads to its degradation, that this marketization creates a new celebrity class of intellectuals who, although well read and informed themselves, see their role in society as persuading the masses that “Hamlet” can be as entertaining as “The Lion King” and perhaps as educational. “Culture,” she wrote,“is being destroyed in order to yield entertainment.”

“There are many great authors of the past who have survived centuries of oblivion and neglect,”Arendt wrote, “but it is still an open question whether they will be able to survive an entertaining version of what they have to say.”

The change from a printbased to an image-based society has transformed our nation. Huge segments of our population, especially those who live in the embrace of the Christian right and the consumer culture,are completely unmoored from reality. They lack the capacity to search for truth and cope rationally with our mounting social and economic ills. They seek clarity, entertainment and order. They are willing to use force to impose this clarity on others, especially those who do not speak as they speak and think as they think. All the traditional tools of democracies, including dispassionate scientific and historical truth, facts, news and rational debate, are useless instruments in a world that lacks the capacity to use them.

As we descend into a devastating economic crisis, one that Barack Obama cannot halt, there will be tens of millions of Americans who will be ruthlessly thrust aside. As their houses are foreclosed, as their jobs are lost, as they are forced to declare bankruptcy and watch their communities collapse, they will retreat even further into irrational fantasy. They will be led toward glittering and self destructive illusions by our modern Pied Pipers—our corporate advertisers, our charlatan preachers, our television news celebrities, our self-help gurus, our entertainment industry and our political demagogues—who will offer increasingly absurd forms of escapism.

The core values of our open society, the ability to think for oneself, to draw independent conclusions,to express dissent when judgment and common sense indicate something is wrong, to be self-critical,to challenge authority, to understand historical facts,to separate truth from lies, to advocate for change and to acknowledge that there are other views, different ways of being, that are morally and socially acceptable, are dying. Obama used hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign funds to appeal to and manipulate this illiteracy and irrationalism to his advantage, but these forces will prove to be his most deadly nemesis once they collide with the awful reality that awaits us.

Exonerations correct only a small number of wrongful convictions

by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Mich.—Criminal justice scholars often say that the true number of false convictions is unknown, but a recently published University of Michigan study challenges that belief.­

Among defendants sentenced to death in the United States since 1973, at least 2.3 percent – and possibly more – were wrongfully convicted, said U-M law expert Samuel Gross.

If defendants who were sentenced to prison had been exonerated at the same rate as those who were sentenced to death, there would have been nearly 87,000 non-death-row exonerations in the U.S. from 1989 through 2003. Only 266 were reported during that time frame, he said.

“The main thing we can safely conclude from exonerations is that there are many other false convictions that we have not discovered,” said Gross, whose research focuses on the death penalty, false convictions and eyewitness identification.

He co-authored the by José de la Isla study with Barbara O’Brien, an assistant law professor at Michigan State University.

“In addition, a couple of strong demographic patterns appear to be reliable,” the study indicated. “Black men accused of raping white women face a greater risk of false conviction than other rape defendants; and young suspects, those under 18, are at greater risk of false confession than other suspects.”

Since 1989, almost all of the exonerations fall into three categories:rape convictions because of post- conviction DNA testing; murder convictions—and especially death sentences—which are sometimes subjected to detailed post-conviction reinvestigation;and drug and gun possession convictions that were produced by concerted programs of police perjury that later unraveled.

Gross, the Thomas and Mabel Long Professor of Law, said capital exonerations are less common for defendants convicted of murdering more than two victims. They are more common for those convicted of murdering children.

These patterns could reflect differences in the quality of the evidence and the likelihood of error based on the age and number of victims, Gross said.

“The low exoneration rate among multiple murder cases may simply mean that defendants who are convicted of killing more than two victims are less likely than others to linger on death row or have their death sentences reduced,” he said.

Capital exonerations also appear to be more frequent among cases in which the criminal investigation was unusually difficult, or where common items of direct or circumstantial evidence of guilt were missing. Other patterns include:

• Exonerated defendants were less likely to have serious criminal records than executed defendants. Gross said he expected an opposite result because the police might attach too much weight to a suspect’s violent history and pursue weak, and sometimes false, cases against plausible-seeming suspects who committed other crimes.

• The confessions are three and a half more common among the accused executed (52 percent) than those exonerated (15 per cent). Many accused for murder confess, and the majority of the confessions are real. Without a confession,especially one that is voluntary, increases the risk of false condemnations.

• The rule for the confessions

repeats itself in the trial. Some accused for crimes that carry capital punishment do not dispute actively their fault before the court. These tacit admissions of fault are more common among the accused executed (38 percent) than between the exonerated ones (13 percent) that were sentenced to death. In other words, among the prisoners sentenced to death the risk that their convictions had been an error is greater in cases in which the accused affirmed actively his innocence during the judgment.

• The clearest proof that a difficult investigation increases the risk of error is the time that passes between the crime and the arrest of the accused. In average, the investigations before to the arrest, in cases with judgment of death penalties that were then exonerated, were a two times and longer than average in the cases that ended in execution.