Thursday, September 3, 2026
Home Blog Page 507

Protesters successfully shut down California Monsanto office

by Jenn Walker
Newsreview.com

Fortune 500 corporation Monsanto shut down its local operations last week as protestors, holding signs and taking turns on handheld megaphone, demanded that the GMO giant needs to go.

The Davis rally was in solidarity with a grassroots attempt to shut down Monsanto offices across the globe. Locally, it worked: After catching wind of pothe planned demonstration, Monsanto employees were directed to avoid work on Friday, March 16.

Activist Pamm Larry leads hundreds of volunteers across the state in collecting 800,000 signatures before April 22 to qualify the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act initiative for this fall’s ballot.

The measure, if passed, would require that any food containing genetically engineered ingredients have a label indicating that the product was derived from genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. It would also mandate that foods cannot be labeled “natural” if they have been processed in any way (i.e., canned, cooked, frozen, fermented, etc.). “People don’t have time to take a college course on what is and isn’t labeled,” she says.

Genetically engineered foods, according to the initiative, are foods in which the genetic makeup has been altered through vitro nucleic acid techniques, cell fusion or hybridization techniques that don’t occur naturally. This includes foods that are genetically engineered to be resistant to pesticides in order to increase crop yields, such as the controversial corn variety created by Dow Chemical that is resistant to the herbicide 2,4-D.

While this initiative will not ban genetically engineered foods, it will ­allow consumers to make a choice whether or not to buy these foods, Larry says. And, while she did  not provide any numbers, she is confident the act will garner enough signatures to qualify for the ballot. Meanwhile, a committee called Stop the Costly Food Labeling Initiative has cropped up to oppose the ballot-measure effort.

This group is backed by the California Farm Bureau Federation, the California Seed Association, the Grocery Manufacturer’s Association and the Council for Biotechnology Information. The committee says regulation would be costly to the state and that it would put California farmers at a competitive disadvantage. Farmers in other states won’t be held to the same standards, they argue, and this would increase the food prices.

The committee cites an analysis released by the state Legislative Analyst’s Office, which estimates that regulation of the measure could cost up to $1 million annually. The LAO further predicts a cost burden for the courts to pursue violations.

The committee also emphasizes the fact that the FDA and medical experts have deemed genetically engineered foods safe for consumption. But Dr. Glayol Sahba, volunteer signature gatherer and Sacramento family physician, noted that the American Academy of Environmental Medicine called for a moratorium on genetically modified foods in 2009, concluding that “GM foods pose a serious health risk.”

The academy cites several animal studies that have shown health risks related to GMO consumption, including infertility, immune dysregulation, accelerated aging, and changes in the liver, kidney, spleen and gastrointestinal system. “Transgenic foods have only been around 10 years,” Sahba said. “We need to not expose people [to these foods] when we are not sure of the consequences to people and the environment.”

According to a statewide poll conducted by EMC Research in June of last year, 81 percent of California voters said they would support an initiative that required GMO foods to be labeled.

The push for GMO labeling is also gaining momentum around the country; as many as 14 states have attempted to pursue similar measures, including Connecticut, Michigan, Oregon, Washington and Vermont. Last week, 55 members of Congress signed off on a bicameral letter to the FDA in support of a petition filed by the Center for Food Safety advocating GMO labeling. Consumers want to see a change in the food system, Larry says, and are demanding transparency. “People are fired up,” she says. “Many of us in the country have felt powerless for a long time, [but] when we unite we can get something done.”

spot_img

Rigoberta Menchu confirms going to Colombia

por Prensa Latina

Rigoberta MenchuRigoberta Menchu

Rigoberta Menchu, Nobel Prize winner, confirmed she would travel to Colombia nest Saturday to be present at the process of the release of prisoners by the Colombian guerrilla.

In statements to Prensa Latina Wednesday Menchu assured she did not receive any official communication from the government of Colombia rejecting her participation in the exchange programmed from April 2 to 4.

Menchu highlighted the international relevance of the group headed by former senator Piedad Cordova, of whom Menchu mentioned her extraordinary work in favour of peace and with the prisoners of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (Farc).

The text is grateful for the interest of the group and limits the participation to the government of Brazil, the International Red Cross and the Colombian group.

Menchu, born on January 9, 1959, is a leader in the Quiche indigenous community and is a human rights defender. She has, besides the Nobel Prize, the Prince of Asturias Prize in 1998 and the appointment as an Ambassador for the United Nations Education, Science and Culture Organization (Unesco).

Colombia, Panama set up bilateral border security plan

Colombian Defense Minister Juan Carlos Pinzon and Panamanian Security Forces Minister Jose Raul Mulino will meet on Wednesday in this capitalto implement the so-called Bilateral Border Security Plan signed in 2011.

The instrument aims at improving the two countries’ capacities to respond to common threats on the border and to boost bilateral cooperation to fight transnational crime.

According to sources from the Colombian Defense Ministry, ­at the meeting, they will define the guidelines of an action plan and training mechanisms for the Panamanian armed forces.

The border between Colombia and Panama is 266 miles long, a separation that also marks the border between Central and South America.

 

spot_img

Agricultural terrorism Monsanto should be named enemy of the State

by Bob Livingston

Monsanto is the largest producer of genetically engineered seeds. Monsanto should be named an enemy of the State. It’s definitely an enemy of the people. Instead, the company has essentially become another branch of government.

Monsanto is engaged in government-sponsored agricultural terrorism. It’s government-sponsored because there is a revolving door between the company, the Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency and firms that lobby Congress on Monsanto’s behalf. Dow, Bayer, other chemical companies and Big Agriculture are Monsanto’s co-conspirators in agricultural terrorism.

In addition to contaminating our food supply with pesticides, hormones and genetic modifications, water supplies are being contaminated as well — even for those who live in the city far away from farmland. And anyone trying to grow crops uncontaminated by Monsanto’s genetically engineered (GE) frankenseeds can be slapped with a lawsuit if the prevailing winds or pollinating insects cause pollen from Monsanto-patented crops to mingle with non-Monsanto GE crops.

The Union of Concerned Scientists recently listed eight ways Monsanto fails at being a good steward of food and moves over to food and environmental terrorism:

Promoting pesticide resistance: Monsanto’s Roundup Ready and Bt technologies lead to resistant weeds and insects that can make farming harder and reduce sustainability. The idea is, supposedly, to create crops that ward off insects and other pests. But the result has been to create insects that are pesticide-resistant. And even worse, application of systemic pesticides like Dow Chemical’s Clothianidin or GE crops that kill “pests” are behind the deaths of hundreds of thousands of honeybee colonies through colony collapse disorder. In almost every case, the EPA and/or FDA ignored science or used junk science to justify approval of the chemicals and crops.

Increasing herbicide use: Roundup resistance has led to greater use of herbicides, with troubling implications for biodiversity, sustainability and human health. By planting crops engineered to be resistant to herbicides, farmers are able, in theory, to keep down weeds by spraying increasing amounts of herbicides. But these toxic chemicals are finding their way into our foods and contaminating our water supplies. Roundup’s key ingredient, glyphosate, is also linked to a decrease in the monarch butterfly population by killing the plants butterflies rely on for habitat and food. Roundup is also linked to the spread of fusarium head blight in wheat, which makes the crop unsuitable for human or animal consumption. Now we also know that use of these herbicides has created “super weeds” that have developed a resistance to Roundup. So Monsanto and Dow are combining to reintroduce the use of the herbicide 2, 4-D, one-half of the defoliant Agent Orange used in Vietnam. Agent Orange is a carcinogen that caused Hodgkin’s lymphoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukemia and other diseases in Vietnam veterans.

Spreading gene contamination: Engineered genes have a bad habit of turning up in non-GE crops. When this happens, sustainable farmers — and their customers — pay a high price. In other words, GE crops are contaminating the crops of those who want to use natural or heirloom seeds and eat and grow foods the way God intended. There is no way of telling what long-term ramifications of these contaminated crops will have on the foods we eat – and, therefore, our health. Plus, as we mentioned above, small farmers are being attacked in courts by Monsanto if their crops — through no fault of their own — become contaminated by Monsanto GE crops. According to a report released by Britain’s Soil Association, GE crops have cost Americans $12 billion in farm subsidies in the past three years and is bankrupting wheat and cotton farmers.

Expanding monoculture: Monsanto’s emphasis on limited varieties of a few commodity crops contributes to reduced biodiversity and, as a consequence, to increased pesticide use and fertilizer pollution.

Monoculture, the planting of a single crop on large swaths of land, is anathema to nature. Everyone knows that crops must be rotated to keep the soil properly balanced. Different plants that bloom and pollinate at different times are essential to sustain the nourishment needed by many insects, birds and animals. Yet Monsanto, Dow and huge corporate farms disavow the laws of nature for profit, and the environment suffers. Monoculture also provides a vast feeding ground that attracts ever-stronger pests, creating a cycle of increased use of pesticides to combat the problem created by the use of monoculture and more pesticides. And when the pests, as in the case of the corn rootworm develop a resistance to the engineered pesticide, they can wipe out thousands of acres of crops, driving up food prices and causing food shortages.

Marginalizing alternatives: Monsanto’s single-minded emphasis on GE fixes for farming challenges may come at the expense of cheaper, more effective solutions. Relying on genetic engineering to fix the problem creates more problems while limiting natural or less expensive solutions.

Lobbying and advertising: Monsanto outspends all other agribusinesses on efforts to persuade Congress and the public to maintain the industrial agriculture status quo. Worse, as noted above, it has become a revolving door that sees members of Congress passing to the company to become executives and lobbyists, and company executives moving to the regulatory agenagencies to regulate their former employer. This is simply crony capitalism at its worst.

Suppressing research: By creating obstacles to independent research on its products, Monsanto makes it harder for farmers and policy makers to make informed decisions that can lead to more sustainable agriculture. And through its system of crony capitalism, research benefitting the company — even when fraudulent — is approved by the regulatory agencies, while natural alternatives are suppressed or outlawed altogether. Independent organizations attempting to provide a rebuttal to the flawed research are often quashed and silenced.

Falling short on feeding the world: Monsanto contributes little to helping the world feed itself, 1and has failed to endorse science-backed solutions that don’t give its products a central role. In fact, what Monsanto is doing is acquiring a state-sponsored monopoly on seeds. GE crops create non-renewable seeds that do not germinate from year to year. This requires the farmer to go back to Monsanto each year to purchase the seeds for the next year’s crop, rather than saving seeds and using seeds from last year’s crop (using the seed corn). This also happens to farmers using heirloom seeds whose crops are contaminated by GE crop pollen.

The European Union has mandated labeling of GM ingredients in food and feed. But that doesn’t happen in the United States, and efforts are afoot to prevent special labeling. But evidence shows that exposure to GE plants and GM feed affects food animals in many ways.

What all this means is that even with the knowledge and desire to avoid GE or GM foods, as the Monsantos and Dows of the world gain more of a hold on world agriculture, it’s going to eventually become impossible to avoid exposure to them. Even planting your own garden with heirloom seeds won’t guarantee you the ability to avoid genetic pollution if someone nearby is using GE crops and pollinators cross pollinate the fields or winds blow the pollen into your garden and it pollinates your crop.

And pesticides and GE and GM foods are being linked to myriad negative health effects including attention- deficit hyperactivity disorder, obesity, diabetes and hormonal disorders.

The insecticide-producing Bt gene is even being detected in the blood tests of people who eat a typical diet, including in pregnant women and their fetuses. Research shows it also kills human kidney cells. Fascism is the union of government and big business. In this system, the people are pawns. Government, Big Agriculture and their partners in crime Monsanto, Dow and Bayer are engaged in a fascist system in which an unwitting populace is kept fat and stupid and without choices, and even those who understand and recognize the system for what it is are allowed fewer opportunities to opt out.

These are who the War on Terror should truly be against. And thanks to global activism and the growth of the Internet and advent of social media, the war on the real terrorists is gaining headway against their war on our health. We can battle agricultural terrorism on our own by minding what we are buying and eating. When you grocery shop, refuse to buy GMO products. Many food producers are now labeling their non-GMO foods as such. You can also use the “Non-GMO Shopping Guide,” available for download here. ­http://www.nongmoshoppingguide.com/.

spot_img

Sunday Street Mission Community meeting

by the El Repotero’s staff

Sunday StreetSunday Street

Sunday Streets co-presenting agencies, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency and Livable City invite you to participate in a discussion about Sunday Streets 4-series pilot project in the Mission. The Mission Sunday Streets Pilot features four consecutive events the first Sundays in May, June, July and August (5/6, 6/3, 7/1, 8/5) on the popular Mission route – Valencia from 14th-24th and 24th Street from Valencia to Hampshire.

The purpose of this pilot is to explore the feasibility of holding more frequent Sunday Streets events on an established route. Our first step is to hold one Sunday Streets per month in the Mission on a regular schedule for consistency – the 1st Sunday of each month – to see what the challenges are and how it works for the community.

Monday, March 19, 2012, 6:30 p.m. at Brava Theater, 2781 24th Street @York.

Some of the heaviest in salsa in San Rafael

Ray Obiedo Group featuring members from Carlos Santana Band Jeff Cressman – Trombone, Tony Lindsay – Vocals and Karl Perrazo on Timbales!

On Ray Obiedo Group featuring members from Carlos Santana Band.

At Georges Nightclub, on Thursday, March 22, 842 4th Street, San Rafael, California. For more info visit: www.georgesnightclub.com.

John Santos Sextet at Rhythmix Cultural Works

Rhythmix Island Arts presents the John Santos Sextet on Friday, March 23 at Rhythmix Cultural Center in Alameda, CA. Funding for this performance and workshop is through the National Endowment for the Arts.

John Santos will also present an Afro-Latin Percussion and Chants Workshop for under served youth ages 8-18 at the Alameda meetingBoys & Girls Club earlier that day as part of this series made possible with funding from the National Endowment for the Arts.

For more information about the workshop and performance, please contact please call Rhythmix Cultural Center at 510.865.5060 or visit www.rhythmix.org.

At Rhythmix Cultural Works, on Friday, March 23, at 7:30-9:30 p.m., 2513 Blanding Avenue, Alameda, California. $20 in advance, $25 at the door, Students/Seniors $15.

The most romantic group ever, Los Ángeles Negros and Central

American cumbia heavy, Los Hermanos Flores

An evening of music from the heart of Los Ángeles Negros will be captivating the audience, along with the stormiest cumbia band from El Salvador, Los Hermanos Flores.

On Saturday, March 24, 8 p.m., at Roccapulco Super Club, 3140 Mission Street, SF.­

spot_img

Tigres del Norte banned from Chihuahua for performing “Narcocorridos”

­Compiled by the El Reportero’s staff

Los Tigres del NorteLos Tigres del Norte

After singing ‘Narcocorridos’ or songs that allegedly glorify the drug trafficking industry in Mexico, the famous group, Los Tigres del Norte, will no longer perform in Mexico’s Chihuahua state. After performing the song, “La Reina del Sur” (The Queen of the South), at a cattle expo concert, the city of Chihuahua issued a statement banning future performances of the group.

City government officials stated, “The musical group will not get permits for future shows in the city limits, until such time as authorities decide otherwise.” They continued to state that the band had violated a three-month-old city law, which prohibited songs about drug trafficking and as a result will face a possible fine of 20,000 pesos or $1,585. Javier Torres Cardona, the City Governance Director, stated, “We ask concert organizers and the artists themselves to think about the difficult situation the country is in.”

Cardona’s statement refers to the close to 48,000 people in Mexico that have lost their lives as a result of drug related violence from December of 2006 until this past September. The state of Chihuahua, lying along the U.S. border, containing the city of Chihuahua as well as Ciudad Juarez, has and continues to witness regular drug related violence. Monday, five men were shot to death in a barbershop in Chihuahua, according to city officials.

The popular group expressed surprise through a Twitter posting and also stated that they were unaware of the city ordinance. However Los Tigres are accustomed to controversy surrounding their music. In 2009, they cancelled an appearance at an awards ceremony after they were asked to not play the song, La Granja or The Farm. This song allegedly alludes to the Mexican drug war. Other popular songs of the group include, Contrabando y Traición or Contraband and Betrayal as well as Jefe de Jefes or Boss of Bosses.

The government has attempted to censor similar narcocorridos from other musical groups since 2002.

­La Actriz Francia Raisa en la cuarta temporada de The Secret Life of the American Teenager

Los Ángeles, CA – Después de tres temporadas de la exitosa serie The Secret Life of the American Teenager, Francia Raisa la joven actriz de origen hondureño-mexicano, quien interpreta a “Adrian Lee”, una adolescente rebelde con una actitud irónica ante la vida, continúa con su camino al estrellato con el estreno de la cuarta temporada de la serie que saldrá al aire el próximo 26 de marzo por la cadena ABC Family y se encuentra en las grabaciones de la quinta temporada de esta aclamada serie.

Francia Raisa nominada en el 2011 a los premios Alma Awards, inició su carrera cinematográfica con la película Bring It On: All or Nothing compartiendo la pantalla con Hayden Panettiere.

Su más reciente proyecto cinematográfico es “Chastity Bites que relata la historia de una asesina serial que sacrifica a más de 600 mujeres vírgenes en el año 1600 y decide bañarse en su sangre para mantenerse más joven. Esta cinta hace burla de alguna forma de las facetas de la sociedad actual, de la obsesión por la belleza y la hipocresía de los adolescentes con respecto al sexo.

Francia Raisa también ha protagonizado las películas de Abc Family The Cutting Edge: Chasing the Drea” y The Cutting Edge: Fire & Ice.

spot_img

El Reportero was born 21 years ago

Dear readers:

Turning 21 can mean many things.

For me, it was almost like getting a star in the Hall of Fame. Year after year, it’s been a long way. But it has been lots of fun as well as lots of sacrifices, lots of hard work and dedication.

Those who don’t know me, I tell you, it’s been fun, but a different kind of fun.

I hardly had a social life for the last 21 years, which prevented me in part from achieving a fundamental human act that most people engage into: marriage.

Behind were left my dreams of having a lovely family, a wife, children. My reality was sitting in front of a computer day and night most of the time, writing, copyediting, doing layout, calling advertisers to place ads in the paper, and after a long week of exhausting work, distributing the product into business outlets through out the San Francisco Bay Area.

My home has been El Reportero – for the last 21 years. I’m usually asked: “Aren’t you tired of all that? Are you making money? You’re always working! Go out and have fun!”

The truth is, I hardly noticed all those things that people were telling I was missing. Through out all of these years I didn’t get tired, or maybe I didn’t notice that I was, and never knew if I made money or not, because, after all, after looking around, who really makes money nowadays? I see people with three or four houses, including two or more businesses that supposedly they own, and guess what, they are deeply in debt up to their neck. And the minute a crisis arrives they lose most of it. So, I thought, money is not what brings happiness, is what you do, and along the way you make the money you need to fulfill all the necessities to help you be happy.

For these people, my motto has been: “When you find the thing you like to making a living in life – let’s say, that magic job – you have just stopped working and have instead, found your lifetime hobby!

Your goal is not just to make money anymore, as long as you have a roof over your head, food and all the other amenities in life. Your passion is your hobby, and your hobby is your passion. And that hobby of ­mine that has kept me busy for 21 years, and made me forget that I was no longer the young man from 21 years ago. And I am still doing it.

My hobby – or my dream job – gives me what no other job would give me. When I finish the edition of the week, 10 of thousands of people will read what I give them to read. Isn’t that a most exciting and satisfying feeling on earth, especially when you learn your product is making an impact on people every time you print a new edition?

Whether it is criticism or praise to your work, it always teaches you and helps you grow intellectually and spiritually. It brings me closer to God, to my Creator, the Great Spirit.

El Reportero was born in March 1991, during a work-study class in the Journalism Department at San Francisco State University, while I was beginning my junior year for my Journalism Degree. And I thank all those merchants who have supported this endeavor by leasing space to advertise their businesses, because without them El Reportero wouldn’t exist today.

spot_img

Renaming America

by José de la Isla
Hispanic Link News Service

MEXICO CITY—Mississippi legislator Daniel Steve Holland introduced HB150 on Feb. 9 before the state House of Representatives’ Marine Resources Committee.

According to Mexican news service Notimex, the Democrat from Plantersville proposes to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

In his presentation before the committee, Representative Holland said he wants all official state dealings with the body of water south of Hancock, Harrison and Jackson counties to go by the new name. In his presentation, he did not refer to the Gulf of Mexico by name, instead to “the body of water.”

Of course, the proposal is intentionally anti-Mexican. It is a textbook example of how public officials stoke local cornpone nativism. It is how a no-name politician capitalizes on knuckle-headed prejudice and foments dissention.

Fortunately, there is serious brain science looking into whether minds like this are normal or psychopathic. (Really, I mean it.)

But the Mississippi name change can have some other consequences. For instance, this is a good time to consider whether to convert the Gulf of California to the Gulf of Arizona. That body of water refers to Mexico’s two California states, not the U.S. state, which does not border it. But if the name is changed to Gulf of Arizona, there’s no mistaking what we mean, even if Arizona does not border it, either. Still, Arizona is closer to that gulf than is U.S. California.

There’s precedent for everything not going by the same name everywhere. The U.S. side of the great divide is known as the Rio Grande while Mexico calls it “Río Bravo.”

For reasons of full disclosure, I have to admit having a personal interest in all this. Like the name “America” comes from an explorer and map-maker Amerigo Vespucci, the first definitive map of my native Texas was done by an ancestor, Frenchman Guillaume d’Isle (or alternately Delisle). The map is named “Carte de la Louisiane et du cours du Mississipi 1718.”

It was the first printed map using new technological methods of the time. Details show a variation of the name for Texas on it, contained in a reference to “Mission de los Teijas etablie en 1716” in East Texas. This is the map that named Texas.

But now that we are setting things straight, its okay with me if Mississippi decides to rename Texas “D’Isle” or “Delisle” (Thank you, very much) for the same reason America is named after Amerigo.

I alluded to Mr. Holland above as a “no-name” politician. This was not intended to insult him but to face up to the fact that some of us are insulted that an American elected official should have “Holland” as a name. This could lead people down at the diner to think foreigners are making our laws.

Heck, we could become the laughing stock of the world. Some people will think we’re all Dutch around here.

I propose, in official documents, we call all elected officials, who have the name of a foreign country, “Noname”. They can keep their Christian names for civic life, but they are not permitted to embarrass us officially with their foreign-country names.

Just so there’s no confusion, if more than one is Noname, each can file for an identity website on their state government website, such as www.Noname002.ms.gov, which provides their civic AKA name.

Failure to register, of course, requires forfeiture of drivers-license rights and denial of all state benefits, and they must provide proof of residency and literacy before voting in elections. They are “illegals,” needless to say, until such time as they become legally registered. We are not against legal nonames, just illegal ones.

Now that’s what I call bridging the gulf between Noname public officials and we, the people.

­[José de la Isla, a nationally syndicated columnist for Hispanic Link and Scripps Howard news services, has been recognized for two consecutive years for his commentaries by New America Media. His forthcoming book is “Our Man on the Ground.” Previous books include “DAY NIGHT LIFE DEATH HOPE” (2009) and “The Rise of Hispanic Political Power” (2003). Reach him at joseisla3@yahoo.com.]

See this column in Spanish and more at www.hispaniclink.com.

spot_img

Superintendent Carlos A. García announces plans to retire

­Submitted by Gentle Blythe SFUSD

Carlos Garcia announced today that he will retire from the San Francisco Unified School District in July 2012 after five years at the helm of SFUSD and 37 years in education. The SF Board of Education has entered into negotiations with Richard Carranza, Deputy Superintendent of Instruction, Innovation and Social Justice, to be his successor.

“It has been an honor and a privilege to serve this great community and work with the great educators and elected officials on our school board and in our city to make sure children come first,” said Superintendent Garcia. “Our work at SFUSD has restored my faith in the excellent opportunities that do exist in public education. School systems can stand for social justice and we can mobilize as a civil rights organization to close the achievement gap for our most underserved students.”

Board of Education commissioners lauded the superintendent for his ability to build a strong culture of collaboration focused on shared goals both within the district and between the district, the city of San Francisco and the community.

“On behalf of the board, we are sad to see Superintendent Garcia leave as we’ve made great strides under his leadership. As much as we would love for him to stay, we respect his decision to spend more time with his family,” said School Board President Norman Yee.

Mayor Ed Lee joined the school board president in thanking Garcia for his contributions to the city.

“It’s been my honor and pleasure to work side by side with Superintendent Carlos Garcia in a continued cooperative spirit to make our schools and community a better place for all our students and their families,” said Mayor Lee. “His bold, no nonsense, do it for the kids attitude has been a strong foundation for SFUSD and his leadership in preparing our youth for the 21st century innovation ­economy will leave a lasting legacy in our City.”

Next Superintendent for SFUSD

Board president Yee announced that the Board of Education will enter into negotiations with Richard Carranza who has served as SFUSD’s Deputy Superintendent for Instruction, Innovation and Social Justice since 2009.

Carranza said he is looking forward to the opportunity to continue to serve San Francisco’s children.

“I look forward to continuing to build upon the remarkable academic achievement trajectory of the SFUSD. My family and I are proud to live in a city that values children.”

Changes in SFUSD Since 2007

Carlos Garcia began his tenure as superintendent in SFUSD in July 2007. Over the past five years the district has increased student achievement test scores across the board and narrowed the achievement gap, including changing graduation requirements to meet the course sequence students must take to be admitted to a California state university. Numerous other new programs, designed to increase the number of SFUSD graduates continuing on to college.

The district has improved instruction for students who are just learning English while continuing to expand the availability of language immersion programs for native English speakers and English language learners alike, including opening a new K-8 Spanish Immersion school in the Mission (Buena Vista Horace Mann) and new Chinese Immersion School in the Haight-Ashbury neighborhood (Chinese Immersion School at D’Avila).

spot_img

Boxing

­Saturday, March 17 — at New York, NY (HBO)

Sergio Martínez vs. Matthew Macklin.

Magomed Abdusalamov vs. Raphael Love.

Edwin Rodríguez vs. Don George.

Saturday, March 24 — at Houston, TX (HBO)

WBC light welterweight title: Erik Morales vs. Danny Garcia.

James Kirkland vs. Carlos Molina.

Jose Luis Castillo vs. Jose Miguel Cotto.

Saturday, March 24 — at Brooklyn, NY (NBC Sports Network)

Zab Judah vs. Vernon Paris.

Saturday, April 14 — at Copenhagen, Denmark

WBO super middleweight title: Robert Stieglitz vs. Mikkel Kessler.

spot_img

The violent militarization of the local police

­by Bob Livingston

Personal Liberty Digest

No toda la policía es lo que esta foto y artículo reflejan. En algún lugar en nuestro communites hay todavía policías que: son sinceramente oficiales de paz dedicados a preservar esa paz y el orden, y que tratan a la gente con respeto. (Foto en algún lugar en los EE.UU.).Not all police are what this photo and article reflect. Somewhere in our communites there are still police officers who are truely peace officers dedicated to preserve peace and order, who treat people with respect. (Photo somewhere in the U.S.).

Law-abiding citizens are no longer safe from police. Once the motto for police officers was “To protect and serve,” but now it seems to be “To harass, assault and attack.”

Across the country, police officers are increasingly militarized and increasingly militant. They make up laws out of thin air, claiming that innocuous activities like watching or videotaping police activities – including arrests on public streets, walking in certain neighborhoods, parking on certain streets and putting trash in trash cans – are crimes.

While the vilest offenders are SWAT teams, even regular patrol officers become violent at the least provocation. Thanks to YouTube and similar content-sharing sites, more of these incidents are coming to light. However, capturing video of these incidents has put the videographer at risk from the police, who often unlawfully and forcibly take the phone or camera and erase its contents or remove its memory card.

It’s not unusual for the videographer to be roughed up and/or threatened with arrest in the process. A list of recent incidences of police brutality and other police misconduct can be read at Injustice Everywhere. Cops have come to think of themselves as gods above the law whose commands are to be obeyed immediately and without question.

Any hesitation often leads to the “suspect” being left bleeding and broken or quivering from electricity introduced by a TASER. It doesn’t matter if the person was unable to understand the command because of a language barrier, or if the person was unable to comply due to disability or defect. Officers expect immediateand complete compliance with no questions asked. They are shooting dogs for barking, tasing and pepper spraying children in schools and shooting wheelchair-vbound men in thevstreets. They apparently feelvthey operate above the law.

http://personalliberty.com/2012/02/13/the-violent-militarization-of-local-police/.

Many, if not most, patrol cars now carry dash cams. Sometimes, dash cam videos are preserved, which allows abused citizens – if they are persistent and dogged enough – to get justice and restitution occasionally. Such was the case shown here, where the officer threatened to shoot a suspect in the head for not revealing he had a concealed weapon in the car. Often, though, the dash cam video mysteriously disappears before trial.

According to a report by the CATO Institute, tens of thousands of raids are conducted by SWAT teams each year. The report claimed: These increasingly frequent raids, 40,000 per year by one estimate, are needlessly subjecting nonviolent drug offenders, bystanders, and wrongly targeted civilians to the terror of having their homes invaded while they’re sleeping, usually by teams of heavily armed paramilitary units dressed not as police officers but as soldiers. These raids bring unnecessary violence and provocation to nonviolent drug offenders, many of whom were guilty of only misdemeanors. The raids terrorize innocents when police mistakenly target the wrong residence. And they have resulted in dozens of needless deaths and injuries, not only of drug offenders, but also of police officers, children, bystanders, and innocent suspects.

The so-called War on Drugs is undoubtedly the casus belli for the increased militarization of the police. SWAT officers are armed and armored as well as, if not better than, soldiers. Drug task forces receive Federal funding to purchase assault weapons, armor and armored vehicles to use in drug raids. They no longer serve warrants by knocking on doors or by picking up suspects on the streets. Instead, they bash down doors or use chain saws to gain entry.

SWAT teams argue their safety requires they swarm into homes. But that doesn’t negate the fact that they create an explosive situation that often leads to innocent people being harmed or killed. Sadly, they often force their way into the wrong residence.

The instance in Tucson, Ariz., in which Iraq veteran Jose Guerena was shot 60 times by SWAT officers in his home is prima facie evidence of the danger these situations create. In the early morning hours Guerena’s wife, Vanessa, saw a man pointing a gun at her through the window. She awakened her husband, who was asleep after working the night shift. Thinking a home invasion was in progress, Guerena told his wife to get into a closet and grabbed his gun.

The SWAT team forced open the door and opened fire on Guerena, then stood by and watched him bleed for an hour before letting paramedics treat him. By then, he was dead. SWAT officers then lied about who shot first. The safety was still on Guerena’s gun, indicating he never fired. Nothing illegal was found in Guerena’s home. It is grounded in conservative American psyche to defend oneself and one’s home. Yet responding to an unannounced and violent intrusion by police will leave you as dead as it left Guerena.

And even if you aren’t shot dead, the police have no qualms about destroying your residence. They claim it is police procedure to gas the house, tear up floor boards, kick in doors and walls, and strew contents of cabinets and furniture to the winds. Requests for compensation are ignored, even if nothing was ever found. But it’s not just suspected drug dealers who feel the wrath of police officers. Just ask Marianne Godboldo of Detroit. Police thugs forcibly removed her daughter for the crime of Godboldo not giving her daughter a pill prescribed by a physician.

Most people dismiss claims of an increasingly violent and aggressive police force as either conspiracy theory or sour grapes by criminals. Minorities have long seen their claims of police brutality dismissed out of hand by white America. Many people naively believe that if they don’t commit a crime, they won’t have anything to worry about from police. But it’s high time that people see this for what it is and connect the dots on the news stories of today.

Congress has just authorized having as many as 30,000 unmanned drones patrolling the U.S. skies. The FBI and Department of Homeland Security are greatly expanding the definition of extremist and terrorist to include people performing normal activities or objecting to paying taxes. The USA Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act have given government carte blanche to detain Americans without charge and without trial and ship them to the Guantanamo  Bay prison resort.

In a series of debates on socialism in 1914, John Basil Barnhill said, “Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.” The government fears the people and the coming conflagration it has sparked. By tightening its grasp on liberty through the militarization of the police force, the pendulum is swinging to where the people are now beginning to fear their government. Where this will lead is anybody’s guess, but I predict it won’t be pretty.

­http://personalliberty.com/2012/02/13/the-violent-militarization-of-local-police/.

 

spot_img