Thursday, September 3, 2026
Home Blog Page 505

A different attitude toward art

by José de la Isla

Hispanic Link News Service

CIUDAD DE MÉXICO – Elizabeth Catlett died this month at age 96 in Cuernavaca, 80 miles distant from this city.

Most accounts of her passing simply referred to her as an African American and a bi-national, a Mexican citizen born and raised in the United States. A few typecast her as an “important African-American” artist to typify her work.

She was much more than that.

She was in the tradition of the 20th century masters. The National Council of Culture and the Arts of Mexico has described Catlett as an artist who always demonstrated in her art a profound interest “in social justice and the rights of black people and Mexican women.”

An obituary in the Los Angeles Times mentioned that the U.S. government had labeled her an “undesirable alien” in 1959. It mentioned that she was briefly held in a roundup of ex-patriots living in Mexico who were suspected of Communist activity. She was denied a U.S. visa throughout the 1960s.

The same obituary quoted her as once telling a St. Petersburg Times interviewer that in Mexico “as an artist you’re greatly admired rather than looked at as something strange. There’s a different attitude toward art in Mexico.”

Catlett’s better-known works include lithographs of the late ’60s of Malcolm X’s and Angela Davis’s images. Her best-known prints include Sharecropper (1968) and Malcolm X Speaks for Us (1969), expressing her lifelong commitment to art as a tool for social change, often incorporating the slogan, “Black Is Beautiful.”

Her well-known sculptures include Dancing Figure (1961), The Black Woman Speaks and Target (1970). Black Unity (1968) shows a mahogany fist on one side and African visages on the other. The sculptures Homage to Black Women Poets and Homage to My Black Young Sisters (both 1968) are red-cedar abstracts of a woman with raised head and fist.

Catlett had said she wanted to show the history and strength of women — urban, country, working and great women of history.

Her biography alone reveals how, in a sense, that one’s life and work fuse the same way nationality, ethnicity, identity, life mission and talents do.

Elizabeth Catlett was born in Washington, D.C. in 1915, the granddaughter of freed slaves, a math-professor father and truant-officer mother. In the 1930s she earned her undergraduate degree from Howard University in Washington, D.C.

She was exposed to the work of Mexican muralists Diego Rivera and Miguel Covarrubias, both of whom had worked extensively in the United States.

Covarrubias, in fact, as an illustrator for the New Yorker and other national magazines in the 1920s and ’30s had introduced to millions the image of sophisticated jazz-age Negroes and Harlem.

Catlett preferred doing semi-abstract sculptures after studying the form as a graduate student at the University of Iowa, earning a master’s in fine art in 1940. She sculpted Negro Mother and Child for her graduate thesis and won first prize in a 1940 Chicago exhibit of African-American artists, the Columbia Exposition.

That same year she chaired the art department of New Orleans’ Dillard University. Later in the 1940s she moved to Mexico City to study ceramics. She added struggles of Mexican workers to her commitment to African-American causes. She referred to “my two people,” even blending their physical features in her art.

She found like spirits in the Taller de Gráfica Popular, a collective known for mass-producing posters supporting populist causes. She met renowned artist Francisco Mora here and married him. He died in 2002.

­In Mexico Catlett gained an acceptance she had not known at home, the same as other U.S. artists, writers, musicians such as composer Aaron Copland have experienced. She continued championing black causes even after becoming a Mexican citizen in 1962.

Perhaps this has to do with artists having a responsibility like that of writers to show the quest for justice, catching individual temperament and mood, finding feeling and exposing their color and shape.

[José de la Isla, a nationally syndicated columnist for Hispanic Link and Scripps Howard news services, has been recognized for two consecutive years for his commentaries by New America Media. His forthcoming book is “Our Man on the Ground.” Previous books include “DAY NIGHT LIFE DEATH HOPE” (2009) and “The Rise of Hispanic Political Power” (2003). Reach him at joseisla3@yahoo.com.]  See this column in Spanish and more at www.HispanicLink.org.

spot_img

Study: Only 1 in 3 Latino college students earn a degree

Compiled by the El Reportero’s staff

One of the critical issues in higher education is the low numbers of Latino students who enroll, persist and graduate. In fact, only one in three Latinos receives either a two- or four-year degree or certificate after eight years. And, while the percentage of Latinos enrolled in higher education immediately after high school grew from 1972-2004, the percentage of Whit­e students doing likewise was larger.

These findings and others come from Challenges for Latino Students in Transitioning to Higher Education: Findings and Recommendations, a presentation delivered at the American Association of Hispanics in Higher Education (AAHHE) annual conference on March 9, 2012. The presentation was given by John W. Young, Senior Research Scientist and Director of the Higher Education Research Group at Educational Testing Service (ETS).

More than one million petitions delivered to Sen. Harry Reid’s office

A leading grassroots campaign to repeal ObamaCare today announced that it was delivering more than a million names of citizens who have signed petitions demanding repeal of the Health Care Act to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Ken Hoagland, chairman of Restore America’s Voice Foundation said that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was, “an assault on the Constitution and on the consent of the governed.”

Hoagland’s group has been airing television ads nationally for more than a year asking citizens to communicate with their legislators about the law. The ads feature Mike Huckabee and more recently, Herman Cain.

“Even if with the best intentions, there are troubling and fundamental Constitutional questions now being argued before the Supreme Court about the reach of our federal government,” he said. “As troubling is the fact that this wide-ranging legislation should not have been enacted without strong support from our citizens who will be forced to live under its many provisions,” Hoagland said.

“This law has profound consequences for our national budget, individual healthcare choices and our struggling economy and does damage to each. Most Americans believe it reaches too far into our personal choices and will raise healthcare costs.”

Many critics believe Obama’s groundbreaking plan is in severe jeopardy due to the fact that five of the justices involved in the hearings were opposed the plan from the beginning.

On the last day of the hearing the justices addressed two key issues.

The justices wanted to know whether the law could stand if the core requisite that most Americans must acquire insurance or face a fine is struck down, they also questioned the legitimacy of the growing state-federal Medicaid healthcare program.

The law, which is the latest attempt in 50 years to provide health insurance to the uninsured and slow down soaring medical costs to an already $2.6 trillion U.S. healthcare system, will be simmering in deliberation for three months and a ruling is expected in late June.

SAFE California Act of 2012

The Secretary of State announced that the SAFE California Act, to replace the death penalty with life in prison without the possibility of parole, qualified for the November ballot. Voters will have the first opportunity ever to choose between the death penalty and a sentence of life in prison with no possibility of parole. Join top spokespeople from the SAFE campaign for a briefing on the ballot initiative.

California is following a national trend. Connecticut will soon become the fifth state in just five years to replace the death penalty; California would become the eighteenth state in the United States to do so. The sponsor of Connecticut’s bill to replace the death penalty will be on the briefing call.

spot_img

Demonstrators confront Wells Fargo shareholders

by David Bacon

Thousands of demonstrators marched and rallied outside the shareholders meeting of Wells Fargo Bank, demanding that the bank stop foreclosing on homeowners: (PHOTO BE DAVID BACON)Thousands of demonstrators marched and rallied outside the shareholders meeting of Wells Fargo Bank, demanding that the bank stop foreclosing on homeowners.  (PHOTO BE DAVID BACON)

­Thousands of angry homeowners, immigrants, union members, Occupiers and community groups converged on the annual shareholders meeting of Wells Fargo Bank. In a carefully choreographed protest, simultaneous marches left Justin Herman Plaza on the city’s waterfront, site of the Occupy San Francisco encampment last fall. Demonstrators walked up parallel streets into the financial ­district, where they encircled the block in which the meeting was set to take place, in the Julia Morgan ballroom of the Merchant’s Exchange Building.

Beforehand, some demonstrators had moved into the building’s lobby, while others chained themselves together, putting sleeves around their arms to make it hard for police to cut them apart to arrest them.

A group of religious, union and community representatives had purchased shares of stock in the bank beforehand, supposedly allowing them to attend the shareholders meeting. Some even held proxies, allowing them to vote the stock belonging to others. As the rally swirled outside, and speeches and songs filled the streets now vacant of their normal traffic, the police closed off the building and refused to let the shareholders inside. María Poblete, from the housing rights organization Just Cause, and Cinthiya Muñoz, from Alameda County United to Defend Immigrant Rights, spoke from a flatbed truck in front of the bank, reminding the crowd of the reasons they’d brought their protests to the bank’s doors. “Shareholders want to meet about how to best reap profits from foreclosures, for-profit prisons and detention centers, student loans, and tax evasion,” Poblete shouted.

“Today the bank can see that there’s no more business as usual. We say no!” Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf, however, closed the meeting to the shareholders kept at bay by the police outside. “Wells Fargo’s actions today demonstrate what communities across this country have been experiencing for years: Wells Fargo is indifferent to the havoc they are wreaking in our communities and they do not want to be held accountable,” said Wallace Hill, whose home was foreclosed on by Wells Fargo in Oakland.

Earlier in April, housing rights activists met with Jon Campbell, Wells Fargo’s executive in charge of social responsibility. They proposed a series of measures to meet the crisis faced by families whose homes are underwater, and a moratorium on foreclosures. Campbell refused to consider any of their demands. The bank is the U.S.’s largest servicer of home mortgages.

“We are the 99%, and we won’t take no for an answer!” Muñoz shouted from the flatbed truck. Fifteen protesting shareholders were finally permitted across police lines, and went into the meeting.

When Stumpf began a presentation congratulating the bank for making a $15.9 billion profit last year, in the midst of foreclosures and a recession, they interrupted him. Police converged on them, took them out of the meeting, and cited and released them. Nine others were arrested outside.

Afterwards, the remaining shareholders approved a $19.8 compensation for Stumpf’s last year’s labor.

“The bank is pleased with the progress we’ve made in a tough economy,” bank Vice President Oscar Suris told the media. “We’ll continue focusing on our customers, and that includes our customers who are going through difficult economic times.”

 

­

spot_img

Women: Before getting pregnant, check your man’s diet

by Mike Adams
Natural News
Part 1 of 2

The day will soon come that informed women will refuse to date, marry or have children with men who follow poor nutritional habits.

“You eat junk foods? Put your pants back on and get out!”

You see, scientific evidence is mounting on the relationship between food choice and genetic integrity. Men who eat a lot of processed meats, fast foods and junk foods have low sperm quality. But it’s more than just an infertility question… it’s also a question of the transgenerational genetic integrity of his offspring.

A man who pursues an unhealthy diet, it turns out, not only increases the risk of numerous diseases in his direct offspring (cancer, diabetes, infertility, etc.), he also increases that risk for multiple generations of offspring.

This was recently demonstrates in a laboratory study conducted by Georgetown University Medical Center and presented at the American Association for Cancer Research (http://www. naturalnews.com/029198_cancer_epigenetics.html) which showed that cancer risk attributable to the junk food fed to parent rats was passed through two generations even if the direct offspring ate a healthy diet.

In other words, for all you women out there, if you choose to have children with a man who’s eating junk foods, not only will your children have an increased risk of disease, but their children will, too! And that’s true even if your children follow a healthy lifestyle!

Now sure, if you’re not concerned about your family line, then just mate with anybody who can produce sperm — and there are a lot of those to choose from. But two, three or four generations from now, the sperm that you chose to combine with your own eggs may turn out to be a ticking genetic time bomb that ends your family line forever through DNA mutations leading to disease and infertility. The genopocalypse I call this coming wave of global infertility the “genopocalypse,” which of course means the “genetic apocalypse.” This is all explained in a video I recently posted on www.Natural- News.TV which you can view at: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=0985DE77D4487C0ECA329AEE5F90D764.

The genetic integrity of the human race is collapsing due to exposure to DNA-altering toxic chemicals in foods, medicines, household products and personal care products. The cumulative toxic burden in first-world citizens has now reached such a high level of toxicity that genetic integrity may no longer be guaranteed from one generation to the next.

Infertility rates are skyrocketing, and even when babies are born through infertility intervention clinics, they suffer far higher rates of genetic mutations and abnormalities than babies conceived naturally.

We are now watching the genetic migration of the human race. It is slowly transitioning to a race of infertile mutants who express very high rates of diseases like cancer and health conditions like infertility. No one knows whether genetic integrity can be recovered once it compromised. The very nature of gene inheritance leaves that doubtful. The upshot of all this is that people who want a family future must be careful to choose healthy reproductive partners. Beyond the quality of the person you are deciding to have children with, you need to consider the quality of their eggs and sperm.

W­atchout for damaged eggs So far, we’ve talked about how women need to watch out for damaged sperm. But the good news for men is that sperm regenerates every few days, so by simply changing your diet right now, you can begin to produce healthier sperm a few days later. Switching to a healthy diet for 3 – 6 months can result in radically improved sperm quality.

But even this has its limits: The upper limit of male sperm viability is still heavily influenced by the diet of his mother during her pregnancy. Yep: The nutritional factors present during the growth of the fetus also strongly influence the lifetime reproductive viability of males.

For women, it’s even more serious. Women, you see, are born with all the eggs they’ll ever have in their lives. Those eggs were formed as a fetus, and the health of those eggs is largely determined by the diet of the pregnant mom carrying the female fetus.

So if you’re a woman, it is your mom’s diet that determined the genetic integrity of the eggs you carry right now. And changing your own diet won’t regenerate healthier eggs. So if you’re a man seeking a healthy partner to have children with, you need to ask about not just the diet of your female partner, but also the diet of her mother during that pregnancy.

It’s getting tricky, isn’t it? There’s nothing quite like interrogating your future mother-in-law about her eating habits… But it gets even more complicated than that. Next week 2nd part: Irradiated women’s eggs

spot_img

UN Court hears arguments in Nicaragua-Colombia dispuste over islands

por Dan Molinski

flag

BOGOTA — The International Court of Justice begins hearing arguments Monday in a long-running dispute between Colombia and Nicaragua over a Caribbean archipelago and the maritime borders surrounding the islands, which some say hold massive deposits of oil.

The case has been going on for over a decade and in 2007 the Hague-based court ruled Colombia has sovereignty over the San Andres archipelago’s three main islands–San Andres, Providencia and Santa Catalina–based on a 1928 treaty between Colombia and Nicaragua.

The new hearings by the court, which will run for two weeks, are to settle ownership of other, smaller islands in the archipelago not covered in the 1928 treaty, and to also settle the nations’ maritime borders in the area.

The islands are 140 miles east of Nicaragua and 480 miles northwest of Colombia.

Even after the 2007 ruling by the court, the United Nations’ highest judicial body, Nicaragua President Daniel Ortega continues to affirm Nicaragua is the rightful owner of the islands. Managua says the 1928 treaty that ceded the islands to Colombia is invalid because it was signed while the U.S. occupied Nicaragua.

In 2010, Colombia awarded national oil company Ecopetrol (ECOPETROL.BO, EC) and Spain’s Repsol YPF SA the rights to explore for oil in the vicinity of the San Andres islands, hoping it would allow Colombia to become an offshore oil driller for the first time and boost overall production.

San Andres marches in support of Colombia’s claim to disputed island

by Brandon Barrett

Colombia Reports

Residents of San Andres organized a march supporting Colombia’s sovereignty of the archipelago after the International Court of Justice (ICJ) began hearing Nicaragua’s claim to the territory Monday.

Colombia has maintained control over the territory, which includes the islands of San Andres, Providencia and Santa Catalina, since the 1928 Esguerra-Barcenas Treaty. Nicaragua has long disputed the treaty which was put into effect while the country was under U.S. military occupation.

The Hague-based court ruled in favor of Colombia’s sovereignty over the archipelago in 2007. The new hearings, which are expected to run for months, seek to determine the ownership of several smaller islands not included in the original treaty, as well as settle maritime borders in the area.

The two groupings of islands are thought to be rich in oil. Colombia’s state-owned oil company Ecopetrol began drilling on the island in 2010 before President Juan Manuel Santos suspended operations due to environmental concerns, although analysts think the move was made to avoid a political spat with the Central American country.

­Spain cuts medical services to undocumented immigrants

by Prensa Latina

Spain´s Socialist Workers Party (PSOE) called xenophobic the conservative PP government decision to cancel free medical services to illegal immigrants.

PSOE General Secretary Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba exposed the conservative government of Mariano Rajoy defense of education and health fund ammendments in Congress hearing of the 2012 general budget.

They are feeding sinister rumors on the immigrants´ health care “abuse” which is false and xenophobic, stressed the leader of the main opposition force.

spot_img

Senator concerned Interpol could arrest Americans under foreign laws

Denounces Obama’s continual bypassing of Congress

by Steve Watson
Infowars.com

Appearing on Infowars Nightly News Wednesday, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said that he fears the international police agency Interpol has been granted too much authority to operate without oversight in the United States.

Paul suggested that new powers granted to Interpol by president Obama could see U.S. citizens arrested or even extradited by the agency under foreign laws.

“I’m kind of concerned about having an international police force in our country with the ability, maybe, to extradite US citizens and send them to another country.” The Senator said.

“Egypt, as you know over the last few months has been holding some American pro-Democracy workers in their country and they were going to try them on trumped up political charges. So a couple of months ago I said ‘you know what, we send two billion dollars to a country that treats us this way?’ So I tried to hold up their foreign aid, and as a consequence, part of what I was doing, they released our American citizens.”

“Then they came home and Secretary Clinton went and released their aid. I wrote her a letter and said she shouldn’t do it because these prosecutions were still ongoing.” The Senator said.

“They also made the U.S. taxpayer pay a five million dollar ransom for these Americans to come home, promising they would come back to stand trial. But this week we have learned that Egypt has asked Interpol for a national warrant, they have these red letter warrants, that can be used anywhere in the world.­”

The Senator has also penned a letter to the president regarding the matter this week.

“Most people say ‘that could never happen inAmerica, we would never let that happen’, but Interpol is doing this in other countries.” Paul noted.

“Saudi Arabia ask Interpol to return a Saudi journalist from Malaysia, who had said something about Mohammed that they had found offensive, and they were going to accuse him of blasphemy.” The Senator added.

“Interpol picked him up in Malaysia and took him back to Saudi Arabia. He will now face the death penalty. But the scary thing is he is being picked up by Interpol. What kind of authority does Interpol have in the United States?”

The Senator pointed out that it was Obama who granted Interpol immunity to operate by way of Executive Order 12425, adding an amendment altering restrictions on other Governmental agencies to the limits the US Constitution.

Paul then spoke more generally regarding the administration increasingly attempting to bypass the Congress on important matters.

“One of the interactions in the last couple of weeks, it was very very telling,” said Paul, “was the interaction between Senator Sessions and Secretary Panetta in a committee, in which Panetta said that if we go to war, of course we’ll consult with the UN and get their approval. Sessions asked him ‘isn’t there a role here under the constitution for Congress?’ And Panetta basically just kept going on about NATO, the UN, and then he finally said ‘we would probably inform Congress of what we are doing, but never in there was there any understanding that they had to get approval or permission from Congress.”

When asked what could be done about such attempts to skirt Congress, the Senator cut straight to the point.

“I think the first thing is to try and stop him in his tracks.” Paul said.

“We tried very hard on the Libya motion. In fact, when he went to war in Libya we introduced his own words from 2007 when he ran for office and said that no president should unilaterally go to war without Congressional authority, which basically just re-states the Constitution.”

“And then he went around and did exactly the opposite when he became president. And this is not the first time a Democrat or a Republican has changed their mind once they became president, they believe in limitations on presidential power until they actually become president.”

The Senator spoke at length regarding other issues including moves to control and censor the internet, the backlash against the TSA, and his father’s ongoing campaign, and the rumors of him being nominated as a candidate for Vice President.

spot_img

Boxing

­April 14 At Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino, Las Vegas (HBO),

Brandon Rios vs. Richard Abril, 12, for the vacant WBA World lightweight title.

At Lima, Peru,

Jose Alfredo Rodriguez vs. Alberto Rossel, 12, for the interim WBA light flyweight title.

April 20 At Bell Centre, Montreal (ESPN2),

Adonis Stevenson vs. Noe Gonzalez, 12, super middleweights.

At Biloxi, Miss. (SHO), Jermain

Taylor vs. Caleb Truax, 10, middleweights;

Erislandy Lara vs. Ronald Hearns, 10, junior middleweights.

April 21 At Schwerin, Germany,

Karoly Balzsay vs. Dimitri Sartison, 12, for Balzsay’s WBA World super middleweight title.

At the Don Haskins Center, El Paso, Texas (SHO),

Abner Mares vs. Eric Morel, 12, for the vacant WBC super bantamweight title;

Anselmo Moreno vs. David De La Mora, 12, for Moreno’s WBA Super bantamweight title.

At TBA, Mexico,

Roman Gonzalez vs. Ramon Garcia Hirales, 12, for Gonzalez’s WBA World light flyweight title;

Jesus Silvestre vs. Edwin Diaz, 12, for the interim WBA World minimumweight title.

April 26 At Panama City, Panama,

Carlos Tamara vs. Ricardo Nunez, 12, IBF flyweight eliminator.

At the Crowne Plaza Hotel, Tulsa, Okla.,

Carson Jones vs. Allen Conyers, 12, for Jones’ USBA welterweight title.

spot_img

2012 San Francisco Carnaval King & Queen competition

by the El Reportero’s staff

Bailarinas de samba durante el concurso de Carnaval 2007.: (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)Dancer at Carnaval 2007 competition.  (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)

A fun and fierce multi-cultural music and dance competition to crown the 2012 San Francisco Carnaval King and Queen will showcase talented contestants from around the Bay Area. This high-energy competition provides all the excitement and colorful flavor of the forthcoming Carnaval, presented by San Francisco Cultural Arts Traditions.

The winners of the 2012 San Francisco Carnaval King and Queen will have the honor of representing San Francisco Carnaval at upcoming civic events and leading the San Francisco Carnaval Grand Parade on May 27.

It will be held at Public Works, 161 Erie Street, San Francisco, on Sunday, April 22nd from 6 p.m. – 11:30 p.m. $15 in advance; $20 at the door. Advance tickets must be purchased on the Carnaval website at SFCarnaval.org.

The San Francisco Carnaval Festival event will take two days, Saturday, May 26 and Sunday, May 27 (Memorial Day Weekend), from 10:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. on Harrison Street between 16th and 23rd Street. Free to the Public.

Spring Open Studios this weekend in the Mission–Support San Francisco artists!

Join us for Spring Open Studios in the Mission this weekend, April 14 and 15.

Stop by, have a glass of wine and check out the work. Spread the word-tell a friend, tell three or four.

Studio #101, Project Artaud (entrances at 401 Alabama near 17th and 2800 Mariposa between Alabama and Florida). Saturday, April 14 & Sunday, April 15 from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. Victor Cartagena www.victorcartagena.net.

Protest our war economy on tax day

Please join Courage to Resist, Northern California War Tax Resistance, and BAY-Peace: Better Alternatives for Youth in saying “Fund the Future of the 99%, NOT the Wars of the 1%!”

We will use poetry, song, dance and theater to spread our message. Come share your vision of what YOU think our taxes should support! Bring a  poem, your resisted tax dollars to redirect, participate in a performance or simply enjoy the fun.

Members of Northern California War Tax Resistance will be sharing resisted war taxes with passers by in an act of conscientious objection to war. Join us!

2-3 pm in front of Oakland City Hall (to prep if you want to be part of the flash mob).

3-4 pm march from City Hall to Federal Building with performances along the way.

4-5 pm, Oakland Federal Building, 1301 Clay St. for more performances in connection with Global Day of Action AGAINST Military Spending. For more info: http://baypeace.org/.

­April 19th, 10:30 a.m, Cindy Sheehan stands up to the IRS in Sacramento!

“When the IRS takes Cindy Sheehan to court to try to force her to support the war machine that killed her son, other war tax resisters from Northern California will be standing with her.

On April 19th at 10:30 a.m., the IRS will ask a judge of the U.S. Federal Court, California Eastern District (501 I St., Sacramento) to compel Cindy Sheehan to give them information that would help them collect money from her. Northern California War Tax Resistance supports Sheehan’s continued refusal to cooperate.”

At the Oakland Federal Building, April 17th, 2-5 p.m. 1301 Clay Street, Oakland.

spot_img

Colombian designer Adriana Castro nominated for rising start award

by the El Reportero’s staff

Adriana CastroAdriana Castro

Colombian designer Adriana Castro is among the nominees for the Fashion Group International’s Rising Star Award in the category of Accessories.

Castro recently received the 2011 Miami Award in the Women’s Handbags category and also had the honor of opening the 3rd Bogota International Fashion Week.

Her accessories and handbags of exotic animal skins that include alligator, ostrich and python have been welcomed into the wardrobes of celebrities like Eva Longoria, Jennifer Lopez, Kim Kardashian, Heidi Klum and Sarah Jessica Parker.

Famed stylist Patricia Field chose five of her handbags to accessorize leading ladies in the movie “Sex and the City 2.”

Her designs have also been featured in Vogue.

This is the third straight year that Castro has received this nomination. On previous occasions the prestigious award went to such trendsetters as Joseph Altuzarra and Tory Burch.

Jerry Velasco Honored with Life Achievement Award at NALIP This Year

Jerry Velasco, actor, producer, businessman, social activist, arts advocate and currently a candidate for the El Monte City Council, has been chosen by the NALIP (National Association of Latino Independent Producers) Board of Directors to receive its: Life Achievement Award in Media Advocacy. Velasco will be honored on April 14, 2012 at NALIP’s gala awards at its annual conference to be held at the Universal Sheraton in Universal City, California.

He was selected to receive the NALIP Life Achievement Award because of his humanitarian work and his lifelong commitment to social justice, labor and workers’ rights, which insured an improved quality of life and many benefits for workers and their families, not only in the entertainment industry, but in the U. S. labor movement in general.

Phenomenal success in the U.S. and Chile

For Prince Royce Prince Royce’s phenomenal success continues to impress in the United States and Latin America.­ After an astonishing performance at the Viña del Mar Music Festival where he earned top honors on Sunday, February 26th, and being nominated for 12 Latin Billboard Awards two days later; the 22-year-old artist closed the week this past Saturday, March 3rd with a completely SOLD OUT concert at the Movistar Arena in Santiago, Chile to the euphoric delight of over 12,000 fans.

Norka número 1 en Venezuela con su sencillo “Milagro”

El “Milagro” de Norka, en su versión pop se ubica en la posicion número 1 en los registros de nuevos ingresos y en 5to lugar en la lista de salsa, en su natal Venezuela. Asi mismo el tema asciende con fuerza en los Estados Unidos situandose en la posición número 16, en el chart de Media Base en su version tropical. Su primer sencillo sigue sonando, mientras la artista se prepara para una gira de clubs y festivales en Estados Unidos, que se iniciara en el mes de mayo en la costa oeste de los Estados Unidos.

spot_img

California State Grange supports GMO labeling for November ballot

by the El Reportero’s staff

Saturday thousa­nds of volunteers will fan out state-wide to launch a petition drive to get the California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act on the ballot in November. In the thick of the grass-roots initiative is the California State Grange, one of the leading partners in the effort.

The California State Grange has long supported the idea that GMOs (genetically modified organisms) in the food supply should be adequately tested and that consumers are entitled to know what’s in food they eat. The American people agree.

Yet despite overwhelming support for GMO labeling, for over a decade regulators and legislators at the national and state level have largely ignored public concerns. That’s why the Committee for the Right to Know is taking the issue directly to the voters of California. Now, with petitions in hand, over 1,500 volunteers will be gathering signatures at stores and farmers markets up and down the state.

“The bottom line is Californians have a right to know what’s in the food we eat and feed our children. It’s time to send a strong, direct message to those who govern us, whether they be agency or elected, that we want genetically engineered foods labeled,” says Pamm Larry, founder of the Committee For the Right to Know. Check the website, www.labelgmos.org for more information on this issue.

More than one million petitions delivered to Sen. Harry Reid’s office

Millions of citizens from every walk of life and every corner of the nation have signed petitions because they do not agree with this law

Washington, DC – A leading grassroots campaign to repeal ObamaCare today announced that it was delivering more than a million names of citizens who have signed petitions demanding repeal of the Health Care Act to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
 
Ken Hoagland, chairman of Restore America’s Voice Foundation said that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was, “an assault on the Constitution and on the consent of the governed.”

Hoagland’s group has been airing television ads nationally for more than a year asking citizens to communicate with their legislators about the law. The ads feature Mike Huckabee and more recently, Herman Cain.
 
“Millions of citizens from every walk of life and every corner of the nation have signed petitions because they do not agree with this law,” said Hoagland.

“Whatever is decided by the Supreme Court, we are asking Senators to obey the will of the people.”
 
 “Even if with the best intentions, there are troubling and fundamental Constitutional questions now being argued before the Supreme Court about the reach of our federal government,” he said.

“ As troubling is the fact that this wide-ranging legislation should not have been enacted without strong support from our citizens who will be forced to live under its many provisions,” Hoagland said.

“This law has profound consequences for our national budget, individual healthcare choices and our struggling economy and does damage to each. Most Americans believe it reaches too far into our personal choices and will raise healthcare costs.”

spot_img