Friday, July 19, 2024
Home Blog Page 5

The panorama in Mexico prior to the presidential election

Andrés Manuel López Obrador won the 2018 presidential race to become the 67th president of Mexico and six years later, Mexico is ready to elect either the 68th president this Sunday, June 2

by Xochitl TC

In Mexico, three possible scenarios are outlined after Sunday, June 2, the day on which 98.9 million citizens will go to the polls to cast their vote and elect a total of 20,708 positions at the federal, state and municipal level; The president of the republic being the most relevant, since everything indicates that Mexico will have its first female president in history.

The greatest election in history

There are 629 federal positions and 20,079 state positions, which will be voted on next Sunday in Mexico and, below, we present what the panorama is prior to the largest election in the neighboring country, where for the first time two women and a man They face occupying the presidential seat.

Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo

She graduated with a degree in Physics from the Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), she has a Master’s degree in Energy Engineering and also a Doctorate in Energy Engineering from the same university. Since her beginnings as a politician in Mexico, she has held various positions in the country’s capital as head of delegation (county) and was a key player in the 2018 elections, serving as AMLO’s campaign spokesperson, in his race for the presidency.

Among the proposals of the standard-bearer of the Let’s Keep Making History coalition, made up of the MORENA, PVEM and PT parties, stand out scholarships for students from basic to university level, free access to the IMSS-Bienestar health system, strengthening of the National Guard to surveillance and security tasks, substantive equality in public positions for women and attention to gender violence and violence against women through the SOS Women Program.

Another of her campaign promises is the increase in the minimum wage, especially for personnel in the militia, the health system and the teaching system. In addition, she will support the current government’s proposal on the Welfare Pension Fund. Said public trust will take 40 billion pesos from unclaimed accounts by older adults holders of AFORES that are considered inactive, with the objective of creating a pension fund, whose trustee will be the Bank of Mexico.

Regarding environmental and mobility matters, she presents the proposal for the transition to clean energy, in addition to building renewable energy generators, without leaving aside the work carried out by PEMEX and CFE, as she expressed that she seeks to strengthen them as public companies. Likewise, she will continue the projects started with AMLO, such as the Maya Train, the Interoceanic Train, the Felipe Ángeles Airport (AIFA) and the Dos Bocas Refinery.

Xóchitl Gálvez Ruíz

She is a computer engineer graduated from the highest educational institution in Mexico, UNAM, and in her political career she has served as senator, head of delegation (county), secretary of dependency of the federal government during the government of Vicente Fox, being at the head of the National Commission for the Development of Indigenous Peoples.

She is a candidate for the Strength and Heart Coalition for Mexico (PRI-PAN-PRD), she seeks to strengthen the sports infrastructure in Mexico, to provide better resources to the country’s sports talent. The security plan is, without a doubt, the most solid, since she has proposed a total fight against organized crime to completely put an end to President AMLO’s “hugs, not bullets” policy.

She proposes creating full-time public schools where students have artistic, sports and cultural activities, and giving free Internet access to educational institutions.

Her environmental proposal is based on reactivating the fund for the protection and prevention of natural disasters, fully moving Mexico towards clean energy and reusing wastewater in urban areas. In that sense, she seeks to create more infrastructure spaces for pedestrian and bicycle mobility throughout the country.

Jorge Álvarez Máynez

He is running for the Citizen Movement party and has a degree in International Relations from the Western Institute of Technology and Higher Studies (ITESO), he also has a Master’s Degree in International Studies from the Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, and also a Master’s Degree in Constitutional Law and Human Rights from the Carbonell Center for Legal Studies.

The focus of his campaign has been to restore their right to happiness, providing environments where they have access to sports and the promotion of a healthy life. His political campaign has focused on attracting the vote of young people, who represent 27 percent of the voters, 26 million young people between 18 and 29 years old, who will be in charge of choosing on Sunday.

It should be noted that, despite Máynez’s attempts to obtain the youth vote, the electoral contest is in dispute between the candidates Claudia Sheinbaum and Xóchitl Gálvez. According to Demoscopía Digital, Sheinbaum has a voting intention of 52.6 percent while Gálvez Ruíz has 29.7 percent and Álvarez Máynez only 14.6 percent.

The Mexico that AMLO leaves

The management of President Andrés Manuel was based on the social policy of “For the good of all, the Poor first.” However, some studies reveal that the poor bore the brunt of this six-year term, since the increase in poverty occurred among the most vulnerable population. In that sense, the NGO Mexicans against corruption and against impunity indicates that in 2018 there were 8.7 million poor people in Mexico and by 2020 there was an increase of 2.1 million, in other words 10.8 million people were in the range of extreme poverty in Mexico just two years after AMLO began his term as president.

In addition to the increase in poverty rates, the perception of insecurity is worrying among citizens, because the increase in intentional homicides has been considerable, registering a 28.20 percent increase compared to the six-year term of Enrique Peña Nieto, a percentage that represents 176 thousand homicides so far in AMLO’s mandate.

Given the campaign promises that AMLO made six years ago, voters in Mexico are hours away from deciding a new course for the country or the continuity of the Fourth Transformation, a transformation that may be overshadowed because by the end of this “humanist” administration  by AMLO there will be 50.4 million people who do not have access to health services.

Open dance floor with the Pacific Mambo Orchestra

Pacific Mambo Orchestra

by Magdy Zara

If you want to dance to live music, to the sound of one of the most recognized Latin music orchestras in the Bay Area, we recommend not missing the opportunity that Freight & Salvage offers you, by presenting the great band Orquesta in its facilities of Pacific Mambo (PMO).

As we remember, Freight & Salvage is a non-profit community arts organization dedicated to promoting public awareness and understanding of traditional music, music that is rooted in and expressive of the wide variety of regional, ethnic and social cultures of the people of everyone.

For its part, the PMO, for its acronym in English, is a Grammy Award-winning orchestra and its repertoire is loaded with contagious energy and excellent musicianship.

Tonight before starting the rhythm wheel show, a free session will be offered. Event organizers remind that with an open dance floor, a ticket guarantees entry but not seats.

Freight & Salvage is located at 2020 Addison Street, Berkeley. Advance tickets are $32 and $37 at the door.

This night of music and dance is scheduled for May 24 starting at 8 p.m.

Cinema and music come together in the Davies Symphony Hall

The San Francisco Symphony Orchestra merges in a single presentation the impressiveness of the seventh art with the majesty of classical music.

On this occasion, the Disney film Encanto will be projected on a giant screen while the San Francisco Symphony performs the scores live.

You cannot miss the opportunity to enjoy with your family the magical story of an extraordinary family in the city of Encanto, with completely new songs by the Emmy, Grammy and Tony award winner, Lin-Manuel Miranda.

The presentations will be this Friday, May 24, starting at 7 p.m., and Saturday, May 25 at 2 p.m.

The Davies Symphony Hall is located at 201 Van Ness Av San Francisco; tickets start at $59.

Redwood City begins summer activities with tribute to Santana

From May 31 to August 30, Redwood City carries out its usual summer activities, which this year reach their eighteenth anniversary, which include concerts, movies, and many outdoor activities that are completely free.

The summer kicks off with a tribute to Santana, which seeks to faithfully recreate the drive and sound that have made Santana’s music a pillar in the history of rock music over the last five decades.

The artists that make up the band are veteran musicians who have spent decades perfecting their craft to bring you the legendary sounds of Santana. You’ll hear all the hits from Santana’s early years to today’s new favorites, and it’s all played with the same instrumentation, soul, and passion.

Among the activities scheduled for this summer, live music of various musical genres is planned every Friday night for fourteen weeks.

The tribute to Santana will be this Friday, May 31, starting at 6 p.m. at Courthouse Square, 2200 Broadway, Redwood City.

Colombia requests Spain to return the Quimbaya pre-Hispanic collection

The request was sent through a letter signed by the Colombian Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Culture, addressed to their Spanish counterparts

by the El Reportero‘s wire services

The Government of Colombia formally requested Spain to return the ‘Quimbaya Collection’, comprising more than 120 archaeological assets of pre-Hispanic origin found in the Museum of America in Madrid, the Spanish capital.

The request was sent through the Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of Cultures, Arts and Knowledge of Colombia through a letter addressed to the Spanish Foreign Minister, José Manuel Albares; and the Minister of Culture, Ernest Urtasun Domènech, according to local media from both countries.

W Radio detailed that the letter is signed by the Colombian Foreign Minister, Luis Gilberto Murillo, and the head of Culture, Juan David Correa, who explained in the letter the importance of the aforementioned archaeological collection for the country, and that its return represents one more step towards decolonization.

The El Diario de España, which had access to the letter sent by Bogotá to Madrid, indicated that the also called ‘Treasure of the Quimbaya’ arrived in that European country at the end of the 19th century, when the then Colombian president Carlos Holguín gave these pieces to Queen María Cristina, to thank her for her mediation in a border conflict with Venezuela.

However, Holguín’s luxurious gift was widely criticized because he delivered it to Spain without the Colombian Congress giving it its approval, an act considered irregular, which violated Colombian sovereignty and laws.

“This gift that was made to Spain was made by an illegitimate person who, although he represented the Government of that time, in 1892, did not comply with the rules that existed then or those that exist now regarding consulting the true owners,” said the Colombian Minister of Culture to El Diario, who also pointed out that this incident was a “brutal act for heritage.”

Endorsement of the Court of Colombia

The request of the Government of Gustavo Petro to Spain also has the endorsement of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, which in 2017 indicated in a ruling that “the transfer of the Quimbaya Collection violated clear norms of the political Constitution of 1886 then in force.”

For this reason, the constitutional court indicated, the Colombian Government should initiate the processes for the repatriation of these ancestral assets that are part of the historical heritage of Colombia and its sovereignty.

“The collection is made up of archaeological goods (ceramics, goldsmiths, lithics and organics) associated with the Quimbaya Classic period that were looted by local guaqueros and delivered by the Colombian Government to the Kingdom of Spain in 1893, ignoring their cultural value for our nation,” indicated the Colombian ministers in the letter sent to their Spanish counterparts, dated May 9.

Minister Correa told El Diario that he seeks to start talks with his Spanish counterpart, Urtasun, who months ago spoke of “decolonizing” Spain’s museums.

“We do not demand anything. We are not a Government that wants to move by force. Only a conversation about the position of the Ministry of Culture, the minister and the Spanish Government on the possible return of the Quimbaya collection,” he said.

Feds: Grocery chain profits soared during and after pandemic

Unrecognizable woman checking a long grocery receipt leaning to a full shopping cart at store.

Consumer groups allege price gouging

per Suzanne Potter

Consumer groups are accusing major grocery retailers – like Amazon, Kroger and Walmart – of price gouging, both during and after the pandemic.

The allegation of corporate greed comes after a new report from the Federal Trade Commission found profits for grocery chains jumped sharply, at rates that could not be justified by supply chain disruptions.

Angela Huffman is president of the nonprofit Farm Action.

“It’s one thing to raise your prices to cover higher expenses, but what these companies did is use the pandemic as an excuse to exploit the American people who needed to put food on their tables,” said Huffman. “And the FTC report shows that they’re still doing it, here in 2024.”

The report found that retailer profits rose to 6 percent over total costs in 2021, and 7 percent in the first three quarters of 2023 – compared to 5.6 percent in 2015.

According to a report from Help Advisor, California households pay the highest grocery costs in the country, averaging almost $300 a week – about $27 more than the national average.

The Food Industry Association blames today’s high prices on high labor costs and credit card payment fees.

Huffman said she thinks the feds should take anti-trust action to increase competition – and consider forcing the grocery behemoths to break up.

“That would be the ideal outcome is to take away their excessive power,” said Huffman. “But other than that, these companies can be fined for this kind of price gouging. And that’s another action we would support. There needs to be some kind of consequences.”

The FTC staff report recommends “further inquiry by the commission and policymakers,” but doesn’t propose specific remedies.

Noboa reluctant to hand over Glas to reestablish ties with Mexico

The Ecuadorian president commented that he wants to have a fluid and peaceful dialogue, “without intervention on one side or the other”

by the El Reportero‘s wire services

The president of Ecuador, Daniel Noboa, expressed his disagreement that the reestablishment of relations with Mexico, which were broken after the assault by the Ecuadorian public force on the Mexican Embassy in Quito last April, is conditional on the surrender of the former Ecuadorian vice president. Jorge Glas, arrested in that raid when he was taking refuge in the diplomatic headquarters and who is currently in La Roca prison in Guayaquil, province of Guayas.

“It does not seem to me personally or to the Government that the only condition and the only way to re-establish a relationship with Mexico is to give them a criminal,” said the president, in an interview with AFP in Paris, France, within the framework of his tour of Europe.

According to the president, his administration wants to have with Mexico “a fluid dialogue and a dialogue of peace, without intervention on one side or the other”; and he mentioned that they are “willing to talk about many things” and even promoted a free trade agreement with that nation for a long time.

“I think it would be better if we once again have diplomatic relations with Mexico for the fight against drug trafficking, since one of the groups that operate in Ecuador are Mexican cartels,” he said in this regard.

But he insisted that “if there are convicted criminals,” they will not allow “justice to be flouted in that way”; pointing out that Glas, who had already received asylum from Mexico at the time of his capture, “is a person who has been convicted of two criminal offenses, according to Ecuadorian laws in past governments” and “was someone who had been given measures alternatives so that he has house arrest”.

“He went to hide in an embassy. It is the equivalent of someone being in prison, escaping and from there going to take refuge in an embassy. It’s that simple,” he added.

Trust in the ICJ

On the other hand, he was confident that they will be “right” at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in The Hague, where Mexico filed a complaint against Ecuador and Quito responded with a counter-complaint later.

In that instance, in response to Mexico’s demand, public hearings were held on April 30 and May 1, where both countries presented their arguments.

“I believe that it will end up being clarified within the Court, if the embassy itself was denatured. We trust that we will be right. The moment a criminal is granted asylum, things begin to become intervention in national affairs, especially in national justice, and we do not agree,” he said in this regard.

At the beginning of May, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico, Alicia Bárcena, mentioned that if Ecuador gives “safe conduct” and hands over Glas, they could “start” talking to de-escalate the conflict.

In that instance, in response to Mexico’s demand, public hearings were held on April 30 and May 1, where both countries presented their arguments.

“I believe that it will end up being clarified within the Court, if the embassy itself was denatured. We trust that we will be right. The moment a criminal is granted asylum, things begin to become intervention in national affairs, especially in national justice, and we do not agree,” he said in this regard.

At the beginning of May, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Mexico, Alicia Bárcena, mentioned that if Ecuador gives “safe conduct” and hands over Glas, they could “start” talking to de-escalate the conflict.

The official then said that Ecuador miscalculated and showed “a lot of inexperience” with the assault on the Embassy and described it as “very poorly done” if Quito understood the granting of asylum to Glas as a provocation by the Mexican authorities.

She recalled that both nations had been talking about it before her country granted the benefit to the former vice president.

“Glas arrived at our embassy on Dec. 17 and requested asylum on December 21. We did not grant it to him without dialogue with Ecuador. It was not a unilateral act by Mexico; we spoke with the Ecuadorian authorities, they themselves sent us the legal files so that we could analyze the request. We studied them and continued with the bilateral dialogue,” he said then.

Lawmakers urge U.S. action to halt China’s organ trade

by Tyler Durden

Authored by Susan Crabtree via RealClearPolitics,

A group of leading China critics in Congress is urging the State Department to step up its efforts to curb Beijing’s gruesome $1 billion forced organ harvesting trade, which targets ethnic and religious minorities, including Uyghurs, Tibetans, Muslims, Christians, and Falun Gong practitioners.

Six members of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, or CECC, sent a letter last week to Secretary of State Antony Blinken asking him to utilize existing agency reward programs to provide monetary incentives for information that will “deter and disrupt the market for illegally procured organs” in China. Rep. Chris Smith, who chairs the CECC, and Sen. Marco Rubio, the commission’s ranking member, joined Democrat Rep. Jennifer Wexton of Virginia and GOP Reps. Michelle Steel of California, Zach Nunn of Iowa, and Ryan Zinke of Montana in signing the letter.

The State Department manages two programs that offer awards of up to $25 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of members of significant transnational criminal organizations. One focuses on violators of U.S. narcotics law, and another targets other crimes that threaten U.S. national interests, including human trafficking, wildlife trafficking, cybercrime, money laundering, and trafficking in arms and other illicit goods.

“We strongly support the Department of State’s efforts to issue rewards for wildlife and narcotics trafficking in the [People’s Republic of China],” the lawmakers wrote. “However, given the global demand for organ transplants and the evidence of the illegal trafficking of organs in the PRC, there is a pressing need to uncover first-hand information from those who witnessed or engaged in the practice.”

The State Department didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Communist China has long harvested prisoners’ organs, even though the government in Beijing initially asserted that all their organ extractions were from voluntary donors. But as far back as 2005, the top transplant doctor in China, then serving as the nation’s vice minister of health, admitted that roughly 95 percent of all organ transplants came from prisoners.

In recent years, leading researchers have documented a reprehensible aspect of these life-ending extractions: Prisoners of conscience – religious minorities and political dissidents are the main victims. There’s now extensive evidence that Chinese surgeons first honed their murderous organ harvesting practices on practitioners of Falun Gong, a meditation and exercise movement. In recent years, the regime expanded its pool of victims to China’s imprisoned Uyghur population as part of its systematic oppression of the Muslim minority group.

China has vehemently denied these claims, but in 2019, the China Tribunal, a non-governmental, independent commission in the U.K., concluded otherwise. The Tribunal investigated accusations of organ harvesting in China and found that some of the more than 1.5 million detainees in Chinese prison camps are being killed for their organs to serve

Set featured image

a booming transplant trade worth an estimated $1 billion a year. The Tribunal also found that the Chinese organ trafficking industry is harvesting organs from executed prisoners and political prisoners at an industrial scale, actions that constitute crimes against humanity.

In response to the Tribunal’s findings, more than a dozen United Nations human rights experts said they were extremely alarmed by reports that organ harvesting was targeting “specific ethnic, linguistic or religious minorities, including Uyghurs, Tibetans, Muslims, and Christians” detained in China. The experts, who operate under United Nations mandates but do not speak on the international organization’s behalf, called on China to respond to the allegations of illegal organ harvesting promptly and to allow international human rights monitors into hospitals and other areas to monitor the country’s organ extraction practices. China has ignored those requests.

In 2022, the American Journal of Transplantation, the leading medical transplant publication in the world, published a peer-reviewed article that uncovered compelling evidence that Chinese surgeons are systematically removing organs from prisoners while they are still alive, providing on-demand supplies for China’s organ export industry.

The practice violates the internationally accepted “dead-donor” rule that holds that organ procurement “must not commence until the donor is both dead and formally pronounced so.”

“Forced organ harvesting is an atrocity, and the disruption and deterrence of this practice should be a priority of the State Department,” the group of lawmakers wrote.

“Getting the PRC to account and fully address evidence of forced organ harvesting will be critical in ending this horrific practice and promoting, long term, the establishment of a truly voluntary organ donation system,” they continued. “With effective enforcement mechanisms, we can work towards ensuring organs are procured safely and ethically.”

Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics’ national political correspondent.

Could Mexican exports be affected by new US tariffs on China? ‘Stay tuned’ says USTR

by Mexico News Daily

The United States government on Tuesday announced plans to increase tariffs on a range of Chinese products across several “strategic sectors,” including electric vehicles (EVs), steel and aluminum, semiconductors and solar cells.

Will the United States impose additional measures targeting products made in Mexico by Chinese companies or goods shipped from China to the U.S. via Mexico?

“Stay tuned” was the message United States Trade Representative Katherine Tai conveyed to reporters on Tuesday.

Ambassador Tai attended a White House press briefing after United States President Joe Biden directed her to increase tariffs on US $18 billion of imports from China (see below).

As soon as the floor opened to questions, a reporter noted that major Chinese EV company BYD is planning to establish a manufacturing presence in Mexico, and asserted that the cars it makes south of the border “could flood the U.S. market” — even though the automaker itself says it has no intention of exporting to the United States.

“Why isn’t the administration preemptively announcing tariffs to hit these vehicles?” the reporter asked.

After expressing concern about BYD’s presence in Mexico – “at USTR, that is exactly what we are built to worry about” – Tai said that measures aimed at made-in-Mexico Chinese EVs, or other products made here by Chinese companies, “will require a separate pathway.”

“This is about imports from China. What you’re talking about would be imports from Mexico. Equally important — something that we were talking to our industry, our workers, and our partners about. And I would just ask you to stay tuned,” she said.

Later in the briefing, the trade representative was asked whether her “stay tuned” remark could be interpreted as her saying that “there could be some changes” to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) rules, which are up for review in 2026, or “to the law that would allow the U.S. to apply tariffs on goods from China that originate in Mexico or other third countries?”

“What I’m saying is the fact pattern that’s developing is one that is of serious concern to us and that, at USTR, we are looking at all of our tools to see how we can address the problem,” Tai responded.

The USTR, as the trade representative’s office is known, subsequently said that it could take several actions other than tariffs to stop China using Mexico as a workaround.

According to an Associated Press report, the office noted that there are provisions within the USMCA to “address unfair subsidies and efforts to avoid import duties.”

Donald Trump, who could be back in the White House in less than eight months, apparently favors tariffs. He said in March that he would impose a 100 percent tariff on cars manufactured in Mexico by Chinese companies if he wins the upcoming United States presidential election.

How will the new tariffs announced by the United States affect Mexico? 

Before considering the question above, let’s take a closer look at the tariffs announced by the U.S. government. The largest tariff increase is that for EVs made in China, with duties set to increase from 25 percent to 100 percent this year.

Tai said on Tuesday that “after thorough review of the statutory report on Section 301 tariffs, and having considered my advice, President Biden is directing me to take further action to encourage the elimination of the People’s Republic of China’s unfair technology transfer-related policies and practices that continue to burden U.S. commerce and harm American workers and businesses.”

“… While the [current] tariffs have been effective in encouraging the PRC to take some steps to address the issues identified in the Section 301 investigation, further action is required. In light of President Biden’s direction, I will be proposing modifications to the China tariffs under Section 301 to confront the PRC’s unfair policies and practices,” she added.

In a statement, the USTR said that “Ambassador Tai will propose the following modifications in strategic sectors:”

  • Battery parts (non-lithium-ion batteries): Increase rate to 25 percent in 2024.
  • Electric vehicles: Increase rate to 100 percent in 2024.
  • Face masks: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2024.
  • Lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2024.
  • Lithium-ion non-electrical vehicle batteries: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2026.
  • Medical gloves: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2026.
  • Natural graphite: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2026.
  • Other critical minerals: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2024.
  • Permanent magnets: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2026.
  • Semiconductors: Increase rate to 50 percent in 2025.
  • Ship to shore cranes: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2024.
  • Solar cells: Increase rate to 50 percent in 2024.
  • Steel and aluminum products: Increase rate to 25 percent in 2024.
  • Syringes and needles: Increase rate to 50 percent in 2024.

Those increased tariffs will provide Mexico with the opportunity to further increase its exports to the United States, according to Gabriela Siller, director of economic analysis at the Mexican bank Banco Base.

“The stronger the trade war between the United States and China, the more potential Mexico has to export to the U.S. market,” she told the El Economista newspaper.

Mexico has also already dethroned China as the top exporter of goods to the United States, sending products worth more than US $475 billion to the U.S. last year. Tariffs imposed on China by the Trump administration and maintained by the Biden administration are seen as the main factor that allowed Mexico to dislodge China from the top spot.

El Economista acknowledged that the new tariffs announced by the United States on Tuesday are primarily designed to benefit companies in the U.S.

However, “countries like Mexico could obtain secondary gains,” the newspaper said before noting that that the United States’ North American trade partners will benefit from a stronger industrial sector in the U.S. due to the integration of supply chains in the region.

One of the sectors in which Mexico and the United States are seeking to increase integration is semiconductors. United States authorities said in March that the U.S. would partner with Mexico in a new semiconductor initiative whose ultimate aim is to strengthen and grow the Mexican semiconductor industry.

Siller noted that Mexico is well placed to benefit from the increased U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods due to its proximity to the United States and because of the USMCA, which allows most Mexican exports to enter the U.S. market duty-free.

But — as Tai indicated — goods made in Mexico by Chinese companies may not enjoy tariff-free status in the U.S. market at some point in the not-too-distant future. Such a scenario would appear to be of significant concern to Chinese companies that have established a manufacturing presence in Mexico to circumvent tariffs imposed by the Trump administration.

Mexico gives China “a back door” into the United States because, along with the U.S. and Canada, it is party to the USMCA, The Economist reported last year. But that door, judging by Tai’s comments, is currently swinging in the wind and could slam shut — or at least be heavily reinforced with protectionist measures — very soon.

Among the Chinese companies with Mexican operations that would be affected by U.S. protectionist measures aimed at them are auto-parts manufacturers that supply U.S.-based automakers.

Will the United States’ higher tariffs work? Stopping rerouting through Mexico will be key. 

Following the U.S. government’s announcement of new tariffs on a range of Chinese goods, Reuters reported that “U.S. officials and trade experts say that without strong efforts to cut off transshipped or lightly processed Chinese goods from Mexico and other countries, China’s underpriced excess production will still find its way into U.S. markets.”

Eswar Prasad, trade policy professor at Cornell University and a former China director at the International Monetary Fund, told the news agency that “the new tariffs might keep out imports from China but it is likely that much of those imports could be rerouted through countries not subject to the tariffs.”

He said that Mexico and Vietnam have benefited from the United State-China trade war, and remarked that both countries need to avoid the “ire” of the U.S. government while they continue to seek benefits from Chinese manufacturing investment.

Mexico is thus in something of a catch-22 situation. President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has said that Chinese investment in welcome, but his government late last year reached an agreement with United States government to cooperate on foreign investment screening, a move that appeared to be motivated to a large degree by a desire to stop problematic Chinese investment in Mexico.

In addition, Mexico last month implemented new tariffs on hundreds of imports from countries with which it doesn’t have trade agreements – another move that appeared mainly directed at China.

The implementation of new tariffs by the Mexican government came amid growing concern in the United States about Mexico becoming a transshipment hub for Chinese goods headed to the U.S.

In a meeting with Mexico’s Economy Minister Raquel Buenrostro in February, Ambassador Tai, according to a USTR statement, “stressed the urgent need for Mexico to take immediate and meaningful steps to address the ongoing surge of Mexican steel and aluminum exports to the United States and the lack of transparency regarding Mexico’s steel and aluminum imports from third countries.”

USTR Senior Advisor Cara Morrow told Reuters that the trade agency has been speaking with Mexican officials about ways to reduce the routing of Chinese steel and aluminum through Mexico to the United States.

She said that U.S. officials have stressed to their Mexican counterparts that the aim of the USMCA is to promote North American integration and competitiveness, “not to provide a back door to China.”

For his part, William Reinsch, a trade expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, told Reuters that attempting to block Chinese excess production “is like squeezing a balloon.”

“It shrinks in one place and pops out in another,” he said.

BYD reacts to the tariffs announcement  

In late February, BYD’s Americas CEO Stella Li confirmed the company would build a plant in Mexico, and asserted it will only make vehicles for the Mexican market here.

“Our plan is to build the facility for the Mexican market, not for the export market,” she said.

Li said that officials in Mexico had been receptive to BYD’s plans to build a factory here.

However, Mexican officials who spoke with Reuters last month said that pressure from the United States had led the Mexican government to refuse to offer incentives to Chinese EV manufacturers planning to invest in Mexico. “Welcome to the country,” Mexico appears to be saying, “but don’t expect us to do anything for you.”

As for the higher tariffs announced by the United States on Tuesday, Li said they won’t have any impact on BYD.

“We don’t have plans to go to the U.S. market, so this announcement does not impact us at all,” she said.

“When we build a Mexican plant, we only consider the Mexican market and other countries’ markets, we have not considered the U.S.,” Li added.

Currently, very few Chinese vehicles are exported to the United States, a status quo the U.S. is clearly determined to maintain.

Reuters reported that in the first quarter of 2024 “Geely was the only Chinese automaker to export to the United States with 2,217 cars, according to data from the China Passenger Car Association.”

With regard to the planned BYD plant in Mexico, Li said there is a shortlist of potential sites, but explained that “deeper dialogue” was needed before a final decision could be made.

The plant is expected to have the capacity to make 150,000 vehicles per year.

Li said that BYD hadn’t discussed incentives with the Mexican government, and didn’t disclose any incentives the company is seeking from federal or state authorities. However, she indicated that she expected that authorities in Mexico – despite what the officials told Reuters last month – will be willing to roll out the red carpet for BYD, the world’s largest EV company by sales in the final quarter of 2023.

“I think all the states will try their best to give a best offer to attract us because we will be bringing a lot of technology there and create a lot of local jobs. Every state, and even the central government, would love this kind of investment,” Li said.

With reports from Reuters and El Economista.

How Congress is letting die an internet connectivity lifeline for millions

by Aaron Sankin

On April 30, a popular and widely used government program began the process of shutting down due to congressional inaction. With its demise, closing the digital divide becomes considerably more difficult.

The federal government first launched a broadband subsidy program during the depths of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, where internet connections became many peoples’ only window into the outside world. That effort, the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP), was made permanent as part of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. It offered a $30 monthly subsidy ($75 on tribal lands) to qualifying low-income households for broadband internet or cell phone bills. The program also offers up to $100 toward a computer or tablet.

However, it came with a major caveat: The $14.2 billion Congress allocated toward the program was a one-time thing. When the money ran out at some point in the future, Congress would have to infuse the program with more money or find a more permanent funding solution.

That future has officially arrived. More than 23 million American households, about 45% of all those eligible nationwide, will no longer receive the full subsidies that previously helped them get online. Two-thirds of those households had “inconsistent or zero connectivity prior to ACP enrollment,” a recent Federal Communications Commission survey revealed.

Partial subsidies of $14 ($35 for households on Tribal lands) will be available for some ISP customers for service in May, according to an FCC notice. But that will be the program’s last disbursement.

“Many recent press reports about the impending end of this program describe how ACP households across the country are now facing hard choices about what expenses they have to cut, including food and gas, to maintain their broadband access, with some households doubtful they can afford to keep their broadband service at all,” FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel wrote in an April letter to congressional leaders. “These press reports echo what the Commission has been hearing from ACP households directly, with many writing the agency to express their distress and fear that ending this program could lead them to lose access to the internet at home.”

Case in point: Alfredo Camacho, who lives in Guadalupe, California, told CalMatters that because he is no longer able to afford home internet service, he’s started taking his daughters to the parking lot outside a local library so the family can use the free wifi to do homework and look for jobs.

“This takes away grocery money,” said Camacho, who is one of around three million Golden State residents losing access to the subsidy. “Being a single father, $30 goes a long way.”

In anticipation of the shut-down, the program stopped accepting new sign-ups in early February. Participating households started receiving notifications about the program’s  potential shuttering in January. After it ends, internet service providers are required to allow ACP-using households to cancel without termination fees.

The program has been an essential part of how millions of Americans get online, with nearly one-in-five U.S. households relying on the subsidy to keep their internet subscriptions active. Uptake has been especially strong in areas with high-poverty rates in both urban and rural areas.

The program is “helping people who did not previously have access to get online,” wrote John Horrigan, a leading researcher tracking connectivity trends, who noted that enrollment has been especially high in diverse, high-poverty areas. “In other words, the answer to the question of whether the ACP is closing the digital divide is a clear yes.”

In 2022, the Biden Administration announced securing commitments from 20 providers to begin offering internet service with at least 100 Mbps speeds to ACP-qualifying households — for just $30 a month and without data caps. When combined with the $30 monthly ACP subsidy, internet connectivity became effectively free for low-income households.

The program also increased the reach of another Infrastructure bill-created effort: The Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program. BEAD is a $42 billion pool that subsidizes internet providers to build new broadband networks in parts of the country where infrastructure is lacking. A Common Sense Media study found that by allowing more people to sign up for internet service, ACP reduced the per-household BEAD subsidy necessary to incentivize internet providers to build new networks in rural areas by 25%. That meant money the government has budgeted to expand broadband coverage could go a lot farther in closing the rural digital divide.

ACP is also massively popular with the public. A survey released last year found 78% of registered voters supported extending its funding. That support crossed the political spectrum, with nearly all Democrats and just over two-thirds of Republicans responding in favor of its continuation.

On Capitol Hill, the program initially appeared to have uncommonly broad support. Last fall,  45 lawmakers, 29 Democrats and 16 Republicans, wrote to congressional leadership asking them to make ACP extension a priority. “We have a unique window of opportunity to ensure that every family and child — rural, urban, and suburban — have access to affordable broadband, and can thrive in the digital age. ACP has become a lifeline for Americans, and we cannot afford to let it expire,” they charged.

It has even united the left and right sides of the political spectrum. The Communication Workers of America, a labor union representing many telecom employees, has advocated for renewing the program. (Full disclosure: The CWA is the parent union of The NewsGuild-CWA, which represents employees of The Markup and CalMatters.) Non-profit advocacy groups like Common Sense Media and the National Digital Inclusion Alliance organized drives for supporters to call their representative about the program’s looming expiration. The R Street Institute, a libertarian think tank, has made its own push – hailing the program as a model for other government connectivity efforts. Conservative publisher Steve Forbes wrote a supportive op-ed for Fox Business.

“It’s often said there are three parties on Capitol Hill – Republicans, Democrats and appropriators. In a rare moment of bipartisan agreement, the first two have recognized the positive impact of the Affordable Connectivity Program,” Forbes wrote. “Now it’s time for the appropriators to get on board and find a solution to permanently fund the program.”

A coalition of more than 230 nonprofit groups and municipal governments, ranging from the NAACP to the City of San Antonio, Texas, wrote a letter begging congressional leaders to renew the program.

ACP didn’t just have bipartisan backing, it also had bipartisan uptake. A report by researchers at USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism found a nearly even split in households taking advantage of the subsidy residing in Democratic and Republican congressional districts.

In 2022, The Markup published an investigation showing how several internet service providers disproportionately offered the worst internet deals to poorer, less white, and historically redlined neighborhoods, in major cities across the country. By way of comment, many companies highlighted their participation in ACP as a defense against their inequitable infrastructure deployment and pricing practices. When it comes to closing the digital divide, ACP is the method the telecom industry points to as an ideal solution – and industry group USTelecom has come out in favor of its extension, alongside individual providers such as AT&T.

Companies have also announced their own, private efforts to fill in the gap left by ACP’s expiration. AT&T, for example, was one of the companies that rolled out one of the $30, 100 Mbps internet plans. The company will continue offering this low-cost plan, which will no longer be effectively free, after the end of ACP.

A directory of ongoing low-cost internet plans offered by internet providers, compiled by the National Digital Inclusion Alliance, is available here. The FCC’s Lifeline program, which provides a monthly $9.25 ($34.25 on Tribal lands) connectivity subsidy to eligible households, will remain in place; however, Lifeline’s eligibility qualifications are more stringent than the ACP’s.

The ACP has had its own controversies. A 2022 report from the FCC’s Inspector General identified some likely fraud in the program. “In the most egregious example identified, more than one thousand Oklahoma households were enrolled based on the eligibility of a single (qualifying), a 4-year-old child who receives Medicaid benefits,” the report noted.

Some Republican senators jumped on the report to attack the program. “Any extension of this program—if it should occur at all—must only happen after there’s a thorough review of the program’s effectiveness at increasing broadband adoption and preventing fraudulent, wasteful, and duplicative spending,” Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz told the Washington Post.

According to the Institute For Local Self-Reliance’s ACP Dashboard, there are 1.7 million Texas households currently using the program.

Last October, the Biden Administration requested Congress pass funding to keep the program active through the end of 2024. “Without this funding, tens of millions of people would lose this benefit and would no longer be able to afford high-speed internet service without sacrificing other necessities,” read a White House press release.

Those efforts have not proved successful.

While the $1.1 trillion spending bill passed in March avoided a government shutdown, it didn’t contain a provision to fund ACP – despite the pleadings of a supportive letter sent to Congressional leadership by dozens of U.S. senators.

Early this year, lawmakers introduced stand-alone legislation that would add $7 billion to fund the program through the end of the year. The House version, introduced by Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke of New York, has attracted 224 co-sponsors, including 22 Republicans. That’s above the threshold of 218 votes required to pass a bill. Even so, Republican leadership has not elected to move the bill out of the Appropriations Committee, where it’s been stalled since January.

On Tuesday, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania introduced a bill that would pay for ACP on an ongoing basis through the Universal Service Fund, a pool of money funded by fees imposed on telecommunication providers that currently pays for things like Lifeline and a program supporting broadband connections for schools and libraries.

This article is copublished with The Markup, a nonprofit, investigative newsroom that challenges technology to serve the public good. Sign up for its newsletters.

Education in Mexico, invaded by corruption within the teaching profession

For more than twenty years, teaching work has been tainted by the transparency of the process for educators seeking to obtain a formal job within the public education system in Mexico

by Xochitl TC

In Mexico, those people who seek to become teachers at the basic or upper secondary educational level must meet the requirements stipulated by the Ministry of Public Education (SEP), the most important being having a bachelor’s degree in education or some other area of teaching, for example. for example, history, literature or mathematics, as indicated in the last call of the System Unit for the Career of Teachers (USICAMM), which belongs to the same government body.

How many teaching positions are granted each year in Mexico?

According to press release number 137 issued by the SEP on July 12, 2023, for the 2022-2023 school year, 125,509 places were assigned, which highlighted that the designation of said jobs was for the “purpose to prioritize the best interests of girls, boys, adolescents and young people to contribute to access to their right to education and guarantee the provision of educational services.” However, different local media in the state of Puebla, Mexico, have focused their attention on an act of corruption within the teaching profession that – according to the authorities of the Mexican Government – can no longer be possible.

Case of sale of teaching positions in Tezuitlán, Puebla, Mexico.

Through the news outlet El Sol de Puebla, a group of teachers recently graduated from universities and normal schools in the region of Tezuitlán, Puebla, Mexico, made a public complaint against a teacher who belongs to the National Union of Education Workers , identified as “Samuel N”. The teacher in question belongs to section 51 of said organization and also “in his capacity as a union representative, he requested official documents and a payment of approximately 100 thousand pesos to 100 people, who were defrauded in their attempt to enter the educational service of the Ministry of Public Education (SEP)”, stated the newspaper in its digital version.

How much does it cost to be a teacher in Mexico?

Covering the expenses of a university teaching career in Mexico are high. Students must travel from their homes to the study center and if they are lucky they can travel within their own locality and in other cases, they must move to the capital of the country (Mexico City) or their entity to train as teachers; However, the amount invested in basic needs such as food, materials, practices, buses and payment for services such as Internet, will depend on the federal entity where they are located. The specialized financial supplement Dinero en Imagen indicated that “from its gastronomy to its educational proposal, each city in Mexico offers something different for young university students, and the regional differences are reflected in the cost of living” and for that reason, the Young university students invest approximately between 600 and 700 pesos per month.

After graduating, what’s next?

Those graduates of degrees in education or specialized teaching who wish to become professors assigned to the SEP must participate in a contest to assign a teaching position and it is through USICAMM that those interested “will compete on equal terms; “It will be public, transparent, equitable and impartial, in which the knowledge, skills and experience necessary for the learning and comprehensive development of students will be appreciated and ensure the hiring of personnel that meets the necessary professional profile,” this declaration cites said decentralized office of the SEP as part of its annual selection process for the admission of teachers.

In contrast to the admission processes that seek to be carried out in accordance with the law and transparency, there are testimonies that indicate the opposite.

A corrupt practice for more than 20 years

Originally from a municipality located in the northwest of the state of Michoacán, teacher Estela Ibáñez shared with El Reportero her experience in seeking better working conditions within the teaching of basic education in the public system. “I have been working in the public education system for 30 years and once tried to change schools to be closer to my town. At that moment I was able to realize that in the system there is a character called “coyote”, who was or, if they follow these practices, is the manager who “carries and brings” the teacher’s official documentation with the Education Union”, he said.

Likewise, she shared that “when I had the need to distance myself for a time from my duties as a teacher in front of a group, I had to find out what procedures I had to carry out and I first tried to change school campus and they told me that if I decided to do so I would have to pay an amount of 30 thousand pesos (approximately 1800 dollars). “I decided not to opt for a change of staff, but to request a leave of absence for six months and my payment was evidently suspended,” she argued. However, once her leave ended and she returned to her job as a teacher, “I had to give them a month of my salary so that my payments could be made normally, that is, that they would pay me my fortnights as they usually did before my license,” he said.

The sales practice that persists until this six-year term.

It was during the second year (2019) of the government of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, that the then head of the SEP, Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, declared that “the sale of teaching positions and extortion of teachers persisted, because in these practices senior managers of the education union and the SEP itself participate” and, unfortunately, it is a practice that has persisted throughout Mexico, that is, it has occurred for more than two decades in the 32 entities of the country.

Despite the attempts of the Government of the Republic to affirm that the sale of places no longer exists in Mexico, it is the testimonies of teachers that portray the reality that exists to this day.

How many teachers are there in Mexico?

The National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) is the body in charge of carrying out demographic censuses in Mexico and through the latest National Occupation and Employment Survey (ENOE), carried out in 2020, it showed that there were 1.2 million people with an occupation. as a basic education teacher, with 69.9% women and 30.1% men.

Jessica Soria, a preschool educator from the state of Jalisco, stated that she had to pay the equivalent of 9 thousand dollars to be placed in a basic teaching position, that is, a permanent job within the SEP, and due to His need to have a permanent job did not matter that the position was granted to him in the neighboring state of Nayarit.

On the other hand, Professor Juan Reyes from the Tierra Caliente area of Michoacán, shared that “although the vacancies are open to the general public and meet the academic profile requested,” the price of being a teacher in Mexico is high, since “that practice has not stopped. People must pay between 14,000 and 18,000 dollars to “buy” their workspace and start a teaching career in the federal education system,” he lamented.

Why is it so attractive to join the SEP as a teacher?

The issue of legal benefits plays an important role for those seeking to enter the SEP and pursue a teaching career or only enter as administrative personnel. Although the salary disparity is evident, because the lowest salary is 180 dollars per month; These days, Mexicans are looking for a job that provides them with job security, to have the right to medical service, vacation bonus, bonus, annual bonus, retirement, among others.

In contrast, stories standout such as those of Mr. Carlos López, who died in 2021 due to a respiratory illness and who unfortunately was not able to leave his 3 minor children a child’s pension. He was an administrative worker in one of the sections of the SEP in Veracruz and during the 4 years that he worked, he only worked in the office. The statute of State workers indicates that only “those minors whose parents have completed -at least- 5 years working within the federal worker system may have the right to a child’s pension.” Mr. Carlos, like other members of the SEP, had to cover a fee of 14 thousand dollars to pay for his work space.

The federal government regarding the sale of teaching positions

Óscar Flores, head of the Administration and Finance Unit of the SEP, stated last February during the morning conference of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador that “in the current administration efforts have been made to redirect resources for the benefit of the workers of education, increasing income, benefits and also, the basicization of more than 945 thousand people.

For his part, AMLO indicated that his government “does not want to sell positions or traffic with the teachers’ payroll, no one is allowed, even if they are the most extreme left or right, no one is allowed, in the country there are no longer tolerated corruption.”

Given the latent facts, these are the testimonies of people who have claimed to have resorted to purchasing a teaching position, because beyond the corruption that remains among high-ranking officials of the SEP, the great need to tell comes to light. with a job in line with legal benefits.

Five first steps to start a company

Happy Latin American man hanging an open sign at a local supermarket and smiling - reopening of business

Sponsored by JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The U.S. is not only home to more than 63 million Latinos, but it is also the place where this community operates almost five million businesses that generate more than $800 billion in annual revenue, according to Stanford University and the Latino Business Action Network’s State of Latino Entrepreneurship Report.

Female business owner of a charcuterie opening for service hanging the open sign on the door and while facing the camera smiling – People at work concepts

Growth in employment and income has increased for this community over the years, however starting a business is still a challenging task that requires a certain optimism, imagination, and perseverance. If you’re looking to start your own business, here are some important initial steps to consider:

  1. Know the business in and out. Whether you want to sell homemade sauces, open a place that serves coffee or offer Artificial Intelligence services, you should know your product or service, the market you have and the competitors. Briefly and simply describe what your business consists of, what need or market it serves and who your potential clients are.
  2. Create a Business Plan. A guide or roadmap focused on your business idea, the market and how you plan to reach your objectives, will not only help you open and face the challenges that exist in a business but also maintain it. Additionally, it will allow you to focus on your idea, see the path ahead and communicate it to potential investors. Agile start-ups only need the description of the proposal, what is needed, finances and potential clients.
  3. Assess the need for financing and look for it. The business plan you created will help you. Many entrepreneurs initially use their personal credit card to fund a business, but there are actually business credit cards, like Chase’s Ink Business Cash Card, that can help meet your needs while earning rewards like cash back on business purchases. If you’re looking to obtain a business loan, you can work with a bank or through the Small Business Administration. Alternatively, there may be public and foundation subsidies where you can do crowdfunding.
  4. Determine the legal structure and register your company. This affects your tax obligations and legal liability. Some options include sole proprietorship, or Unipersonal Company — one owner is responsible for the debts; partnership –if there are more than two people; corporation — to separate personal responsibility from that of the business; LLC — or Limited Liability (the most common). Seek legal assistance to determine what structure is best for you and your business.
  5. Register with the IRS. Consider whether you should have an employer identifier number among other things to keep tax obligations separate.

For more information and tips on how to start and manage a business, visit chase.com/es/business.

For informational/educational purposes only: Views and strategies described may not be appropriate for everyone and are not intended as specific advice/recommendation for any individual. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries do not warrant its completeness or accuracy.