Thursday, September 12, 2024
Home Blog Page 490

Third part of The Lost 13th Amendment

by Marvin J. Ramirez

Marvin  J. RamírezMarvin J. Ramírez

“…If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” – The 13th Amendment to the Constitution

“…A country cannot be both ignorant and free.” – Thomas Jefferson “The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American People.” – George Washington. This is the third part of the article: The lost 13th Amendment to the Constitution.

Last week we ran the second part of this multi-part article, in hope that it will provide our readers with information that has been kept a secret by the controllers of our country – the bankers and their private army of lawyers.

In her own words, Lisa Guliani’s article The Lost Thirteenth Amendment, brings out what our Founding Fathers intended to when they drafted the final work of the Constitution that would protect us from any eventual tyrant government that could arise and deprive Americans from their freedom and their wealth, and to enslave us. So following, Guliani’s continues with her denunciation.

Have you ever noticed how many lawyers there are in our government? We see them everywhere, in both high and low level positions. This is nothing new. Roughly half of our Founding Fathers were lawyers. As far as the top spot in government, 21 of our former Presidents were lawyers (or well-read in the law). The most recent former U.S. President just so happens to also be an attorney – Bill Clinton – who is, conveniently, married to another attorney, Hillary Rodham Clinton – Secretary of State.

Of those former Presidents who were lawyers, one was called the “Dark Horse” President (James Polk), another was the only U.S. president to never marry (James Buchanon), and still another married the daughter of a banker (William McKinley). This last example will segue nicely into a discussion about lawyers and bankers and a little known amendment to the Constitution numbered 13.

The 13th Amendment to the Constitution?

Not familiar with it? It’s no wonder. No one ever discusses the 13th Amendment – in fact, our so-called government has been ignoring its existence since the 1800’s.

However, it has been the subject of some controversy in certain circles, and for good reason. You see, the 13th Amendment, also called the “Title of Nobility” Amendment, which prefaced this article – deals with prohibiting LAWYERS from holding positions of public office within the U.S. government.

But, wait a minute. Lawyers are EVERYWHERE in our government, aren’t they? We see them scurrying around like little cockroaches all through the corridors of our federal buildings. Attorneys are constantly vying for public positions – in fact, it seems that the only way to even GET many of these governmental positions is to BE a lawyer. We have come to accept this as commonplace, standard practice – a requirement, even.

We may not like or trust this practice, but it has always been the way things were done. Or is it? Why haven’t we heard more about this 13th Amendment if such an important piece of legislation prohibits attorneys from holding these positions? Well, that is an interesting tale, but it may not surprise you very much. It is yet another example of the dog-and-pony show being performed before the American people, and is why we see the lawyers swarming all over government like germ-infested ­cockroaches spreading disease and polluting public policy. When this piece is finished, I am going to go wash my hands.

The 13th Amendment sought to keep lawyers from gaining a political advantage over others, thereby restricting them from achieving power and control over the rest of us. And, despite the fact that many of the Founding.

Fathers were attorneys, they realized quite keenly how easily a person skilled in that profession could exploit the system and the citizenry by using legal prowess, political savvy and government/corporate connections to personal advantage.

They wanted to ensure that each person had equality under the law. At least those great men had some scruples. It’s a shame that legislation proposed by men of real honor and integrity was overridden by some corrupt, greedy power-mongers lacking any scruples, honor, or integrity of their own.

Virginia was the final state required to ratify the 13th Amendment and add it to the Constitution. However, conveniently enough, a little thing called the War of 1812 got in the way. It is interesting to note the timing of the War of 1812 coincided with the proposal of the 13th Amendment. Very interesting. Focus on Virginia’s position on the ratification of this amendment waned due to the ensuing war and so, that state’s decision was not made known until 1819.

The length of this article is so large that we could probably run pieces of it for many weeks. But there are many other subjects that we must write about. But we will try writing more about this story.

Any one who would like to expand on the Lost 13th Amendment will be able to find it online by Googling the name.

White House proposes consumer protection agency

by Samuel González

Anti goverment torture activists protest in front of the San Francisco Federal Appeals Court: against Judge Jay Bybee, who helped design legal ways that would help the government torture Iraqi people. (photo by Marvin J. Ramirez)Activistas contra la tortura gubernamental protestan frente a la Corte de Apelacines del 9o Circuito de SF, contra el Juez Jay Bybee, quien ayudó a diseñar maneras legales para elicitar la tortura contra la gente en Irak. (photo by Marvin J. Ramirez)

Hispanic and black consumers, thousands of whom were victims of predatory lending that locked homebuyers into unfairly high interest rates, would gain safeguards under a new White House proposal.

The creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, submitted by the administration to Congress June 15, would protect consumers from unfair lending practices and promote transparency and accountability by lenders.

If approved, it would eliminate some practices that contributed to the financial downturn, the administration says.

According to a Pew Hispanic Center study, Hispanics who borrowed in the subprime market paid annual rates 2.6 percent points higher on 30-year fixed-rate conventional mortgages. For blacks the average rate was 3.0 percent higher. on President Lack of credit education and predatory lending by financial institutions left low-income families unable to make their mortgage payments and facing foreclosure.

Center for Responsible Lending spokeswoman Kathleen Day told Weekly Report that nearly one in two Hispanics who applied for a loan at the height of the 1lending boom was given a subprime loan.

A survey by the National Council of LaRaza found, in addition to unsustainable mortgage payments, many Hispanics have become overly dependent upon credit cards and pay excessive rates 13 percent have cards Nawith interest rates above 20 percent, keeping them in cycles of debt, according to the NCLR report.

In other news:

By 2025 whites may become minorities on college campuses

Before the year 2025, students of color will outnumber whites on U.S. college campuses for the first time, a new report projects.

By 2021, white students will make up barely 52 percent of the nation’s college student population and two or three years later, they’ll be in the minority, Chronicle Research Services calculates. Its study, designed to help higher education institutions plan ahead, measures the ethnic and racial makeup of current high-school graduating classes plus factors such as likely population growth, refined recruitment, pedagogical changes and overall accessibility.

In 2021, annual Hispanic student enrollment is projected to increase over 2009 enrollment by 276,000 and for Asian/Pacific Islanders by 79,000, while dropping by 237,000 for white students and 44,000 for black students.

CRS’s 59-page report is the first of a three-part series on what higher education institutions will look like in the years ahead. It is based on reviews of research and data on trends in higher education and interviews with experts who are shaping tomorrow’s colleges.

A “2008 Measuring Up” report by Chronicle researchers found that overall 59 percent of white students complete a bachelor’s degree within six years of enrolling but only 47 percent of Hispanics, 41 percent of African Americans and 39°/0 of American Indian students accomplish the same thing.

The new report can be found at http://research.chronicle.com/reports.html. By Arlinda Arriaga. Reach her via e-mail at arriaga86@yahoo.com.

Blacks, Hispanics save less

LOS ANGELES — Blacks and Latinos accumulate less in their 401(k) plans than whites of similar income levels, and tend to invest conservatively, a study by Ariel Investments and Hewitt Associates shows.

Among people earning less than $30,000 a year, whites averaged $8,000 in their401 (k) accounts. Blacks and :Hispanics averaged about half that amount.

For those earning more than $120,000, whites averaged savings of $223,000, blacks $150,000 and Latinos $154,000.

The differences result from behaviors such as waiting too long to start investing, borrowing too much from 401(k) plans and avoiding stocks, it said.

Cuts hurt college chances

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Hundreds of thousands of students are likely to be denied admission from low-cost community colleges across the country over the next year because of funding cuts at the same time that record numbers of students are turning to the open-admission schools, according to Ll.S. education ­officials.

The Obama Administration promises to aid the nation’s alonost 1,200 community colleges, which educate 12 million students, or 44°/0 of all undergraduates, including the majority of blacks and Hispanics. Hispanic Link.

 

Disclosing genetic risk for Alzheimer’s does not cause depression

by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Mich. – Telling people with a family history of Alzheimer’s that they carry a genetic variant that further increases their risk of developing the disease doesn’t cause lasting depression or anxiety, a new study found.

These findings help address a longstanding debate about whether disclosing such information causes lasting psychological harm, at least among those with a family history of Alzheimer’s disease, says Scott Roberts, a U-M researcher at the School of Public Health and co-author of the study findings, which appear today in the New England Journal of Medicine. People with a family history are already at higher risk, which is further increased if they also carry a certain version of the genecalled Apolipoprotein E (APOE).

Roberts and colleagues at Boston University, Case Western Reserve University, and Cornell Medical College tested 162 people with a parent with Alzheimer’s, which means their risk for developing the disease by age 85 is about 30-35 percent, compared to the general population risk of about 10-15 percent.

After an educational session about Alzheimer’s and genetic testing, researchers tested subjects for their APOE genotype to learn if they carried the genetic variant. The presence of the gene increases the risk for those with a family history of Alzheimer’s to more than 50 percent. For subjects who did agree to the test, specially trained genetic counselors then disclosed results and researchers followed

participants over one year to determine the impact of risk information.

The researchers measured anxiety, depression and test-related distress after six weeks, six months, and one year. Test-related distress did increase slightly ciudadesat six weeks for people with the risk-increasing form of the gene, but not at 6 months or one year, Roberts said. Anxiety and depression levels remained stable.

“Some people might say, ‘I’m thinking about this a lot,’ but it didn’t translate into long term depression or anxiety,” Roberts says.“The findings show if you do (disclose this genetic information) genetic counseling may be an important component to ensure that most people do not respond with significant distress.

“Genetic counselors help put the test results in context so that people understand the meaning and limits of the results,” Roberts says. For example, for participants with a 55 percent lifetime risk, counselors explained that there was a 45 percent chance that they would never develop the disease.

The APOE link to Alzheimer’s was identified in the 1990s, and traditionally, the medical community doesn’t favor disclosure of theAPOE genotype – orother genetic markers –unless telling patientsdirectly impacts clinical treatment, Roberts says.

­However, now that private companies offer genetic testing for a variety of conditions, the debate over clinical utility versus personal utility is growing.

Some argue it’s paternalistic to tell people what information they can or cannot know about their own genome, he says. It’s important to note that after the initial educational session, 20 percent of the subjects opted out of the actual test, which means the majority wanted to know.

“I think most adult children of Alzheimer’s patients would favor the right to at least have the choice,” he says.

Roberts conducted this research while at Boston University. He came to the U-M in 2006.

Roberts is second author on the paper, called “Disclosure of APOE Genotype for Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease,” and co-principal investigator on theRisk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer’s Disease (REVEAL), a series of randomized clinical trials examining the impact of a genetic susceptibility testing program for adult children of people with Alzheimer’s.

Calderón and PAN crushed in Mexican elections

by the El Reportero’s news services

The scale of the defeat of Mexico’s ruling Partido Acción Nacional (PAN) in the elections on July 5 was worse than even the most pessimistic opinion polls had forecast.

The defeat has already forced the PAN’s president to resign and triggered an unprecedented clash between panistas in Guadalajara in the PAN-controlled state of Jalisco. Not only was the PAN crushed in the congressional elections but it was also pushed back in the six gubernatorial and numerous state congress and municipal elections that were held simultaneously.

Overall, the PAN is now much weaker than it was at the comparable point in President Vicente Fox’s term (2000 to 2006). The only encouragement it can glean from that memory is that it did recover from the mid-term drubbing in 2003 to retain the presidency in 2006.

The verdict was crushing for President Felipe Calderón and his ruling Partido Acción Nacional (PAN). Fewer than 45 percent of the electorate bothered to vote, despite a major effort by the government to stress the importance of the elections. Of those that did vote, most voted for the opposition Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) but over 5 percent cast void ballots.

Apra back on top after Peru reshuffle

Javier Velásquez Quesquén, the former president of Congress, was sworn in as the new prime minister on July 11.

Although only six of the 16 new members are card-carrying members of President Alan García’s Partido Aprista Peruano (Apra), the new cabinet is more narrowly based than the outgoing one. Its senior fi gures now all take President García’s line that all the social unrest in the country is being fomented by radical leftists loyal to Presidents Hugo Chávez of Venezuela and Evo Morales of Bolivia.

Uruguay offers Bolivia sea access

The Uruguayan and Bolivian presidents will meet in this capital, especially to tackle, among other issues, the former’s offer to Bolivia access to the Atlantic Ocean In its first visit to Uruguay as head of State, Evo Morales will tackle with his host Tabare Vazquez important issues on the bilateral and regional agenda, but this subject has hit the local and international media headlines.

The issue has auspicious antecedents, because Vazquez stated at the beginning of the past week that “we talked about it with Evo several times and we want to make progress in that direction.”

“It is a gesture of solidarity by our government and our country towards a brother government and people,” the president said.The Uruguayan proposal includes readying a port in Montevideo for Bolivian trade that could start operating in 2010, with similar administration ­to that of the Chilean Arica port.

Urge solución en Honduras para estabilidad de la región

Para la estabilidad política, comercial y social de Centroamérica es necesario solucionar la situación de Honduras, afirmó hoy el ministro de Hacienda de Costa Rica, Guillermo Zúñiga.

En su opinión, las actuales condiciones en Honduras, tras el golpe de Estado que destituyó al presidente constitucional, Manuel Zelaya, pueden afectar mucho a su país y al resto de la región.

Zúñiga precisó que Centroamérica es un mercado de 80 millones de habitantes, por lo que si uno

Honduras’s future remains uncertaing following coup

by Maricela Cruz

Impoverished Hondura — with 7.4 million natives still at home and 600,000 or more residing in the United States is digging in for what may be a protracted wait as the Central American nation struggles to untie the political knot that has kept it off balance since June 28.

On that date, Honduran military leaders and political opponents of leftist President Manuel Zelaya staged a coup, arrested and deported their increasingly isolated leader and placed Roberto Micheletti, a former colleague of the president, in power. Zelaya lost favor with many countrymen for allegedly trying to alter the country’s Constitution to allowhim to remain in power after his term expires.

Initial international reaction to the coup was that the democratically elected government should quickly be restored to power and Zelaya allowed to serve until his term ends next year. But after his failed try to fly home July 5 and spreading concern about his leadership strength and friendship with Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, some analysts are moderating their assessments.

Peter Hakim, president of the Washington, D.C.-based think tank Inter-American Dialogue, offered this overview of the current situation to Weekly Report: “The incoming government has a certain advantage precisely because it holds the reigns of power. The longer it can keep Zelaya from returning to Honduras, the less likely he’s ever to do so.”

Understandly, Hondurans scattering throughout the United States express more concern about the welfare of their family members than the political turmoil in its capital Tegucigalpa.

They are fairly divided politically, added Manuel Orozco, director of remittances and developmental Inter-American Dialogue. He listed Miami, New York, Houston and New Orleans as among communities with greater concentrations, pegging the U.S. Honduran diaspora at about 600,000, with half that number arriving following Hurricane Mitch in 1998.

Among developments following the coup:

  • ­The Organization of American States has expressed support for Zelaya as the country’s democratically elected leader. So has the United Nations, which voted June 29 to pursue the restoration of power to Zelaya.
  • The U.S. cut some aid and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, favoring the return of Zelaya, called on former president Oscar Árias of Costa Rica to assist in bringing the political division to a peaceful resolution. (His first meeting brought no results.)
  • The Congressional Hispanic Caucus, consisting of nearly ell of the body’s two dozen-plus Democratic members, released a statement July 7 calling on ‘’Roberto Micheletti and those responsible for the removal of President Zelaya to respect the rule of law and restore the constitutional order… The Constitution of Honduras must not be disregarded.

“We fully support the efforts made by the Organization of American States, and we encourage our government to take the necessary diplomatic steps to ensure a peaceful restoration of the democratically elected government in Honduras.”

The smaller, all-Republican Congressional Hispanic Conference took a different view. “Rather than engaging in efforts to restore Zelaya to power, the U.S. should focus on demonstrating respect for the Constitution of Honduras, its democratic institutions, and the rule of law as the Honduran people work to resolve the current situation in their country.” Hispanic Link.

Annual fundraiser for Peruvian poor

by the El Reportero’s staff

Integrantes de la Hermandad de Fremont, con ocasión de la Novena realizada en octubre de 2007 bajo la dirección de Luz Bermúdez.Member of the Hermandad of Fremont, during the ocassion of the Novena that took place in October 2007, under the direction of Luz Bermúdez.

The Hermandad del Senor de Los Milagros de Fremont, a non profit organization will be celebrating its 11th Anniversary. The event is organized to raise funds for poor people in Perú. All proceeds will be donated to help families and children in need. The event will be held on July 18th 2009 from 7 p.m. to midnight at the Holy Spirit’s Great Hall in 37588 Fremont Blvd, Fremont California.

Tickets are sold at $30 a person, includes dinner, drink, desert, folkloric show, and live latin band. For reservations contact Andrés Bermúdez at 510-366-5801.

Syria Behind the Scenes: Screening and filmmaker discussion

“We are terrorists, we kill visitors with caffeine,” so joke Syrians in the new documentary film Tea on the Axis of Evil.

The American born and bred director and producer of the film, Jean Marie Offenbacher, will screen her film in its San Francisco premiere and offer her insider’s look into the life of this complex, post modern culture. In her documentary citizens from a wide range of social and religious backgrounds discuss family values, education, politics, and religion.

“Syria should be the model for change in the Middle East, but it becomes progressively less progressive as it is left in a diplomatic vacuum. The moderate voices are far more numerous and speak to the great possibility of peace in the region starting with Syria,” observes Offenbacher. “My film provides an intimate passage through Syria that gives voice to moderates as it seeks to build a bridge to greater understanding between our worlds.”

FREE for Members, $18 for Non-Members, and $7 for Students (with valid ID). To buy tickets call 415.597.6705 or register at www.commonwealthclub.org. On July 13, at Club office, 595 Market St., 2nd floor, San Francisco, California.

Mexican tall ship “Cuauhtemoc” arrives under Golden Gate Bridge

The Mexican Tall Ship “Cuauhtémoc”, will sail into San Francisco Bay under the Golden Gate Bridge, where local tall ship “Seaward” (callofthesea.org) and the San Francisco fireboat, “Phoenix”, will greet her to create a visual spectacle with over 27 sails, 259 crew and a water display.

It will sail in tandem with “Seaward” and “Phoenix”, along the waterfront, to her berth at Pier 27, and it will be arriving to San Francisco after a 30 day sail from Japan.

The ship will be open for free public tours on July 13 from 1:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on July 14-17 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., at Pier 27, San Francisco.

­Bachata Festival

Club Roccapulco presents the SF International Bachata Festival Big Pre-Party, featuring Julio Bravo and His Band Live. Thursday July 16.

Late Puerto Rican comedian will become first latino at the National Radio Hall of Fame

by Antonio Mejías-Rentas

German TV show host Thomas Gottschalk, left, gestures while Mexican-born opera singer Rolando Villazon, center,: performs with a Bavarian brass band, during the German TV show “Wetten dass.German TV show host Thomas Gottschalk, left, gestures while Mexican-born opera singer Rolando Villazon, center, performs with a Bavarian brass band, during the German TV show “Wetten dass.

­TRIBUTE: The late Puerto Rican comedian José Miguel Agrelot will become the first Latino to join the National Radio Hall of Fame.

Agrelot -who was listed in 2003 in the Guiness World Book of Records for having hosted a morning radio broadcast, Su alegre despentar, for 54 years, will receive the tribute Nov. 7 at the Museum of Broadcast Communications in Chicago Besides his longevity on Puerto Rican radio, he also became a beloved TV star. Following his 2005 death, Puerto Rico’s newest and biggest sports and entertainment venue was named Collseo Jose Miguel Agrelot.

Ironically, Fuerto Rico’s government is selling naming rights to the venue.

ONE LINERS: Mexican tenor RolandoVillazón, who had previously cancelled all 2009 engagements to undergo and recover from surgery of the vocal chords, has cancelled his May 3 scheduled performance in Carmen at the Viena (Austria) State Opera… the Archivo Digital del Tango, the fi rst digital correction of recordings and other audiovisual material related to Argentina’s national dance, was launched this month by the group Tango Via Buenos Aires… and singer, actor and model Julio Iglesias Jr., best known for his participation in reality shows such as Gone Country, is now competing on ABC’s The Superstars; he is also the son and brother, respectively, of international stars Julio and Enrique Iglesias…

FIRST DECADE: The New York International Latino Film Festival (NYILFF) is set to mark its 10th anniversary this summer with a slate of local and national premieres.

José Miguel AgrelotJosé Miguel Agrelot

The festival opens July 28 with the New York premiere of La Mission, a fi lm set in that San Francisco neighborhood written and directed by Peter Bratt and produced by his actor brother, Benjamin Bratt, He also stars in the fi lm, along with his wife Talisa Soto-Bratt and Jesse Borrego.

A highlight of the festival is the July 29 tribute to actor John Leguizemo that includes a screening of his fi lm Where God Left His Shoes.

Other premieres include the documentary Calle 13: Sin Mapa, about the Puerto ­Rican urban duo’s road trip through South America and Los Bandoleros/Fast and Furious, the latest installment in the action saga reuniting actor Vin Diesel with reggaetón stars Don Omar and Tego Calderón, Tickets go on sale July 4 for screenings, which move into two new venues this year. Complete schedule and ticket information at: www.NYLatinoFilm.com.  Hispanic Link.

­

Council on Foreign Relations callsfor sweeping immigration reform

by the El Reportero’s staff

The Council on Foreign Relations, one of the oldest and most respected nonpartisan foreign policy think tanks in America, issued on July 8, a sweeping report on U.S. immigration policy.

Developed by an independent task force comprised of bi-partisan leaders, including former Florida Governor Jeb Bush and Former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Thomas “Mack” McLarty, the report finds that the passage of comprehensive immigration reform is vital to the national interests of the United States.

The report offers a number of specifi c recommendations to reform current policy, but most notably insists that the time is now to pass comprehensive immigration reform. Failure to do so, argues the task force, “threatens to weaken America’s economy, to jeopardize its diplomacy, and to imperil its national security.”

­Legislation against mortgage scams

Supervisors David Campos and Sophie Maxwell introduced legislation today initiated by Asses- sor-Recorder Phil Ting and District Attorney Kamala D. Harris to put an end to loan modifi cation scams in San Francisco, according to a news release.

The Board of Supervisors ordinance would require a written contract outlining proposed services, prohibit loan modification consultants from collecting a fee before helping a homeowner obtain a favorable loan modifi cation, and provide for enforcement with criminal penalties and a private cause of action for aggrieved homeowners.

UC Berkeley workers and students to convene emergency town hall meeting

UC President Mark Yudof has proposed to slash the pay of 150,000 workers at the University of California system, impose up to 21 furlough days, or implement some combination of these two options in order to cover a funding shortfall from the State. Additionally, students at UC will face a minimum 9.3 percent increase in student fees this coming year, even as programs will be cut and class sizes increased.

Reactions to the president’s proposal from staff, students, and faculty at the University have been anger and distrust. In response, workers and students at UC Berkeley have come together to combat the atmosphere of fear and dread that UC has created: The Student Worker Activist Team, or SWAT, has announced an Emergency Town Hall Meeting on the campus for Thursday, July 9, to discuss alternatives and organize resistance to UC executives’ proposals.

With the mantra that we must all “share the pain”, UC boasts that 30 of its top executives have already taken a 5 percent salary cut. What they fail to mention is that seven of those executives had already received an average of 22 percent more in salary hikes over their predecessors in the past few years.

With friends like this

by José de la Isla

HOUSTON, Texas — Emerging from a June 25 White House meeting on immigration and 19 other congressional leaders and President Obama, Congressman Silvestre Reyes said he believed the U.S. House had the votes to pass comprehensive reform legislation­.

Yet, just hours before the policy conversation, Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel told reporters that while passage was “not impossible,… you wouldn’t need to have the meeting” if the Presidfent had the votes.

This is not the first time Obama’s man has been impolitic about the thorny immigration issue. This time around, however, Emanuel, who formerly represented in a Chicago district in Congress that was 25 percent Hispanic in population, pitted this important issue with another. “It’s also better that we continue to focus on improving the economy,” he said, as if to dismiss the importance of immigration as a policy matter.

This sic-‘em approach taunts other pit-bull issues in the waiting — health care, deficits, education, energy or the environment — with immigration. It’s characteristic tactic to urge delaying a showdown. “I think the more important thing is to get it started this year,” said Emanuel, as if getting it completed wasn’t more important.

But the fact is all this was started and went unfinished in 2007. Emanuel, in fact, is remembered for saying that immigration was the “third rail” of Democratic politics and warned Democrats to stay away from challenging Republicans on it (along with avoiding criticism of the war in Iraq). Most of those who bought in didn’t do as well in the mid-term election as those who ignored him. He seems to have gained some succor from Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.), a strong immigration reform advocate, who told The Wall Street Journal, “Hell, if we had the votes, we wouldn’t be calling you.”

On the other hand, Jim Manley, an aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), took issue about the votes. He noted that the Senate passed a bipartisan reform bill in 2006 and could do so again, saying, “The White House should leave the vote counting to us.”

At the meeting with Obama, Rep. Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.), chair of the Small Business Committee and the Hispanic Caucus, showed President Obama a list of 210 House members out of a total of 435 ready to vote for comprehensive reform. “I don’t know where Rahm Emanuel is getting that information,” she said.

Reyes and Velázquez were among the 20 Congress members attending the White House bipartisan meeting.

Obama told the legislators that the American people wanted tightened borders, cracking down on employers using illegal workers who drive down wages, and an effective way to recognize and legalize undocumented workers.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano will head a group of House and Senate leaders to start working through these issues.

Obama announced the FBI had cleared much of the backlog of background checks holding up the legal immigration process.

Homeland Security has been cracking down on unscrupulous employers exploiting the immigration situation.

At the meeting, Obama referred to “the overheated rhetoric and the occasional demagoguery on all sides of the issues.”

Yet, unless he and his man Emanuel are doing a good-cop-bad-cop act, there’s something unfunny about the mixed messages they are giving.

Emanuel’s White House message is different from the President’s. One has to wonder whether Emanuel has opened a new third rail on the immigration issue, one feeding demagoguery to the middle, making reform seem more unfeasible than it is, a diversion from other big-ticket matters.

When you are ahead on a 440-yard dash, as on immigration reform, it’s not smart to add another hundred yards. Hispanic Link.

[José de la Isla’s latest book, Day Night Life Death Hope, is distributed by The Ford Foundation. He writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service and is author of The Rise of Hispanic Political Power (2003). E-mail him at joseisla3@yahoo.com]. © 2009

Second part of the lost 13th Amendment

­by Marvin J. Ramirez

Marvin  J. RamírezMarvin J. Ramírez

< Last week’s we published the first part of The Lost Thirteen Amendment to the Constitution. If you did not read it, I encourage you to do so by visiting www.elreporteroSF.com when it comes out. We are currently a little late in publishing our online edition.

The Thirteen Amendment deals with the prohibition to lawyers from running for public office because of their holding of a title of nobility, Esquire.

As we wrote in our first parte of this article last week, the time of its initial proposal in 1789, and again in 1810, there were 17 states in the Union. To become part of the Constitution, the 13th Amendment had to be ratified by 13 of the 17 states. It is fully accepted that ratification was achieved in 12 states.

Lisa Guliani is the author of most of this second parte to The “Lost” Thirteenth Amendment. Guliani came across some interesting documents on the missing 13th Amendment, which she relates in her own words, as follow. >

Of particular interest to me was one which refers to researcher David Dodge, who found a book in the Library of Congress Law Library which he discovered in the rare book section, titled “2 VA Law,” which is un-catalogued. The volume “reveals a plan to overthrow the constitutional government by secret agreements engineered by lawyers.”

As Dodge puts it, “There is no public record that this book even exists.” What??

Secret scheming by lawyers? Imagine that. Sound farfetched to you? It sounds right on the “money” to me. Throughout our history, bankers and lawyers have worked in conjunction to rule the world and destroy the United States. They almost succeeded a few times, and now look who’s at it again… Take the Depression of the 1930’s, for example, which was a classic case of illicit banking practices that impacted hard working members of society in extreme ways over an extended period of time. Ask any elderly person to tell you about the Great Depression.

If they can recall the past, they will surely provide explicit information about the harrowing days of that period. In current times, politicians, lawyers, bankers, and governmental agencies work together like some malignant tumor raging through the nation – further contaminating an already infected system, spreading more political and economic disease throughout the Machine and the country. Who suffers? We all do – everybody that is, except for the bankers and the lawyers, who always seem to float to the top of the cesspool.

The 13th Amendment is also called the “Title of Nobility” Amendment because it refers to the word “Esquire,” which was (and still is) used by attorneys behind their names.

The word comes from the English.

Back in the old days, the allegiance of “Esquire” lawyers was called into question by our forefathers. Why? Because they couldn’t be trusted as far as you could throw them.

An attorney with a title behind his name was deemed loyal to the monarchy in those days – therefore, our ancestors wanted to prohibit any person bearing such a title or those receiving “honors” (exemptions the rest of the citizenry are not privy to) from holding public office. I think it’s safe to say that people in general regard lawyers warily to this very day, with good cause. Why? Because things haven’t changed a whole helluva lot. They just leave a bad taste in your mouth… The reasoning behind the proposal of the 13th Amendment was so that those persons (lawyers) in political power positions could not dictate or influence public policy by using their skills to destroy or subvert the government. In fact, the 13th Amendment makes it very clear that any person within the ranks of government holding public office, found to have a title of nobility or to be accepting ­“honors” must lose his position and FORFEIT HIS CITIZENSHIP to the United States. Wow!! This is a serious penalty! Our Founding Fathers considered “titles of nobility” a great threat to the continuity of the Republic, and so this penalty was added to the amendment to get the point across that such titles would not be tolerated in American government.

The 13th Amendment was put into place to protect the People from corrupt, dishonest lawmakers. (What happened along the way?) At the time of its proposal in 1789, and thereafter, there were forces opposed to its ratification. Gee, does this come as any surprise? We know who they were – and are.

THEY were and are the Controllers and their henchmen – and THEY will tell you that this amendment was never ratified. However, there is evidence to suggest that this is just another lie among a dung-heap of lies we have been fed. THEY blow a lot of smoke up the ole chimney, don’t they?

We will continue next time, with: The Reasoning behind the proposal of the 13th Amendment.