Saturday, August 31, 2024
Home Blog Page 468

Study floats undocumented as U.S. economic liferaft

por Luis Carlos López

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A major immigration study released here this month by political economist Raúl Hinojosa-Ojeda is helping trigger new efforts to move a comprehensive immigration bill onto Congress’s front burner.

The national policy review states that implementing a program to bring the nation’s estimated 11.9 million undocumented residents onto a path to legalization would create $1.5 trillion in U.S. economic growth over the next ten years.

Hinojosa-Ojeda’s research is receiving world wide attention, with positive reaction and recognition among several influential U.S. policymakers, plus a few brickbats from anti-immigration forces, he told Hispanic Link News Service. It is stirring thousands of blogosphere debates.

Following a well-attended news conference here, the University of California at Los Angeles professor met with interested Administration and World Bank officials, hosted a briefing for 50 congressional staffers, shared findings from his multi-year project in detail with D.C. think tank brain trusts, and held additional one-on-ones with international and domestic media.

The assessment, “Raising the Floor for American Workers: The Economic Benefit of Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” compressed to 25 pages for mass distribution, projects that legalizing undocumented immigrants, in combination with a program that allows for a future immigration flow based on labor market needs, is far more pragmatic and profitable than any alternative deportation-only scheme being promoted by some members of Congress.

“If we pursue a deportation-only policy, it will drain our already anemic economy by $2.6 trillion over the next ten years and cost billions to implement,” Hinojosa-Ojeda, who serves as executive director of the North American Integration and Development Center, affi rmed. He called undocumented immigrants “a hidden economic engine” that is constantly being repressed, maintaining, “Legalization empowers workers immediately to become much more committed and integrated in the economy.”

The report was released Jan. 6 to the press by the Center for American Progress and the Immigration Policy Center, and discussed with a panel of economic and social strategy experts.

Hinojosa-Ojeda told Hispanic Link his organization will continue encouraging and producing community impact studies, suggesting that any on the effect of workplace raids on the welfare of communities where they were conducted could prove of particular value. He said he anticipates communities nationwide to use the report’s data to construct actions that will benefi t them. Among the report’s other fi ndings:

• Contrary to public perception, low-wage workers will benefi t from legalization of undocumented workers.

• The number of unauthorized immigrants residing in the United States has increased dramatically since the 1990s from an estimated 3.5 million to its present total, estimated at nearly 12 million.

• Despite the huge increase in federal funding for border security — a 714 percent growth since 1992 — the apprehension rate for undocumented immigrants has declined since 2001.

• Increased border enforcement does not effectively deter undocumented immigrants from entering the United States.

• A massive deportation strategy creates other negative consequences. With tougher enforcement, fatalities along deserts and other dangerous crossing areas increase; the underground market for smugglers places further stress on the immigrants, and unfair labor practices continue to exploit undocumented workers.

These issues, Hinojosa-Ojeda said, would be mitigated with legalization reform.

At the study’s release, Daniel Griswold, director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, echoed Hinojosa-Ojeda’s conclusions by presenting the institute’s recent finding on the economic benefits of legalization.

Both studies concluded that increased enforcement and reduced low-skill immigration will have a negative impact on the income of all households.

­“I think it is very significant that two independent studies came to the same conclusion,” Griswold said. “The common feature is that legalization provides better jobs for middle-class Americans.”

Hinojosa-Ojeda confirmed that sparked a lot of negative commentary along the right-wing media, particularly criticism from blogs.

“It’s creating a massive buzz on the right wing but they haven’t been able to negate the fundamentals,” he said.

In addition to Hinojosa-Ojeda and Griswold, other experts weighed in on the benefits of legalization were Heather Boushey, senior economist at the Center for American Progress, and Benjamin Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Council.

The panel was moderated by Vice President for Immigration Policy and Advocacy at the Center of American Progress Angela Kelley.

For the complete report visit: http://immigrationpolicy.org/special-reports/raising-floor-american-workers.

 

 

Time for a new narrative

por José de la Isla

HOUSTON – Some academics, when they rethink how we look at an idea, refer to a “new narrative.” This is kinda a no-fault way not to apologize but to change the storyline. It’s also called “reframing,” sometimes. People in the political arena do it all the time.

For instance, Sarah Palin didn’t quit as Alaska’s governor but refused to become a lame-duck just to travel and draw a paycheck. It was, heck, a selfless act: “I’m not putting Alaska through that,” she said. After having promised “efficiencies and effectiveness,” she was just delivering on her word.

New narrative, reframing.

But sometimes, there’s no framing at all. And without an interpreter or a context, some information feeds the devil in us. We think the worst.

Take for example how much has been made of a Zogby International Poll a couple months ago that reported one-third of all Mexicans wanted to come to the United States.

Since one of our national characteristics is our love-fear relationships (since the times of the Puritans), here was a finding that appealed to our sense of danger, something to pout about. It was fuel for those who distort data to stoke anti-reform fears. It soaks the mind in a brine which makes it seem doing anything is like doing everything wrong.

The problem with that is as stand-alone opinion, it’s just plain wrong-headed, even if the data are accurate. That one was validated by a Pew Research Center poll.

The narrative feeds the belief that everyone else in the world who is having a hard time wants to come here. And we don’t want “our” jobs and “our” neighborhoods displaced by others. We are the insiders, they are the outsiders.

But how does that square with the opening line of a Dec. 19 article in The Economist: “For the first time in history, across much of the world, to be foreign is a perfectly normal condition.” Or put another way, it’s not all about you and the way it was.

According to the Gallup polling organization, about 700 million, or 16 percent of

the world’s population, want to move to another country. Of these, 210 million would choose a European destination, 165 million the U.S., 45 million Canada, and 10 million would choose Singapore.

Our narrative suggests that the 700 million are the “others,” and not us. It presupposes people mostly want in here. It does not tell us that we also want out.

Another Zogby poll blows a hole in the old interpretation. It fi nds 25 percent of the present generation of U.S. 18-to-29-year-olds believe they will live a signifi cant part of their lives in another country. Zogby calls them and the new attitudes and perspectives arising from an internationally conscious generation, First Global citizens.

It seems that as this country begins to think about immigration as part of the public policy agenda for Washington, a Ground Hog’s Day phenomenon will take hold. In the movie by that name, the events of that day are repeated over and over. The same thing happens when the same old yammerers take the mike and say the same old nasty things about others.

This is the narrative that needs a new scenario. The play must be reframed.

It helps to think of our country as one place, some of us call it home, where people come and go, and we are replenished by the movement of humanity. Take.

Then in the next scene. we who are a little over the hill join our sons and daughters in attitude and perspective as First Global citizens. It’s a wrap.

­[José de la Isla writes a weekly commentary for Hispanic Link News Service. His latest digital book, sponsored by The Ford Foundation, is available free at www.DayNightLifeDeat hHope.com. E-mail him at joseisla3@yahoo.com.]

Don’t let freedom slip

por Marvin J. Ramirez

­Marvin  J. RamírezMarv­in R­amír­ez­­­­­­­­

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR This long article will show everyone of you our readers how precious is freedom, and we are about to lose it – and I mean lose our free country if we – concerned people, cops, army soldiers, those political fools who don’t know who they are really working for – don’t wake up now and stop the New World Order taking force now. El Reportero is presenting your with this opportunity to read it for history learning purposes and aid you to think in making a difference now.

According to the unknown sender of this article, which it may be long, but it is worth reading because if we don’t learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it. Praise to God for those who are willing to teach us from their experiences. This is a story by Kitty Werthmann, a woman from Austria who believes America is truly the greatest country in the world, and does not want us to lose our freedoms the way other people lost theirs.

Because of the lack of space, we are going to publish it in three parts. This is the first one.

The full 63-minute story is available on CD for $15 or $12 with purchase of another item at Realityzone.com

Don’t let freedom slip

by Kitty Werthmann

What I am about to tell you is something you’ve probably never heard or will ever read in history books.

I believe that I am an eyewitness to history. I cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history. We elected him by a landslide – 98 percent of the vote. I’ve never read that in any American publications.

Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force.

In 1938, Austria was in deep Depression. Nearly one-third of our workforce was unemployed. We had 25 percent inflation and 25 percent bank loan interest rates.

Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily. Young people were going from house to house begging for food.

Not that they didn’t want to work; there simply weren’t any jobs. My mother was a Christian woman and believed in helping people in need. Every day we cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry people – about 30 daily.

The Communist Party and the National Socialist Party were fighting each other. Blocks and blocks of cities like Vienna, Linz, and Graz were destroyed. The people became desperate and petitioned the government to let them decide what kind of government they wanted.

We looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany, where Hitler had been in power since 1933. We had been told that they didn’t have unemployment or crime, and they had a high standard of living. Nothing was ever said about persecution of any group — Jewish or otherwise. We were led to believe that everyone was happy. We wanted the same way of life in Austria. We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of unemployment and help for the family. Hitler also said that businesses would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back. Ninety-eight percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have Hitler for our ruler.

We were overjoyed, and for three days we danced in the streets and had candlelight parades. The new government opened up big field kitchens and everyone was fed.

­After the election, German officials were appointed, and like a miracle, we suddenly had law and order. Three or four weeks later, everyone was employed.

The government made sure that a lot of work was created through the Public Work Service.

Hitler decided we should have equal rights for women. Before this, it was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home. An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldn’t support his family. Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for marriage.

Hitler Targets Education – Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children: Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang “Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,” and had physical education.

(Next week will continue with part two: How parents were threaten with jail if did not sent their children to attend the government’s National Youth Day.)

A message from youth

Jóvenes y niños marchan por la paz en el Distrito de la Mision: (photo by Marvin J. Ramirez)Youth march in the Mission District for peace.­ (photo by Marvin J. Ramirez)

­1.) We are sending a message of love and peace to our youth. Speaking as ONE MISSION, we will not accept or tolerate violence as a way of life in our community.

­2.) We want to highlight the collective work that Community Based Organizations and individual members do on a daily basis; working to prevent crime in our community and empower youth and families. (Despite the Mayor and Police Department taking sole credit for the reduction of crime.

3.) We are fighting back against the Mayor’s Office for the devastating cuts, not only DCYF funded programs, but also the compolete elimination of entire programs that serve youth in our community. We are literally fighting to keep our children and youth alive and safe; ensuring them the right to a better quality of life and the pursuit of happiness.

Signed by Mission Community Peace Collaborative: Mission Beacon-Precita Center; HOMEN; Mission Girls; MiCoCo; Safety Net Boys & Girls Club; Mission Prep; SF Promise; Mission Graduates; Arriba Juntos; United Playaz; CRN; CARECEN; Instituto Familiar De La Raza; CUAV.

Students help enable cleaner cooking fuel in Nicaragua

­

­by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Mich. – Cleaner cooking fuel for parts of the developing world that still rely on wood is the goal of a University of Michigan student project. Engineering students are designing and building better biodigesters, which turn animal waste and food scraps into a biogas to power a stove.

In a biodigester tank, the waste can mix with water in the absence of oxygen, allowing the anaerobic bacteria already present in the waste to break it down into biogas and compostable material.

Cooking with biogas is healthier and more environmentally-friendly than cooking with wood.

“Fine particulates are released into the kitchen and the women who are in the kitchen all day have to breathe this in,” said Heather Dorer, an engineering undergraduate student who traveled to Nicaragua in August 2009 as part of this project.

During the 10-day trip, students learned about the biodigesters currently in use there and installed one. They have since used this knowledge to develop a new conceptual design for digesters that is appropriate for rural Nicaragua and similar cultures elsewhere. They expect to have a prototype by May, and to return this summer to continue the project.

“We’re improving the designs by increasing the user friendliness and also improving the yield of the biogas,” said Zijia Li, an undergraduate engineering student.

Students involved in this project belong to the organization BLUElab, which stands for Better Living Using Engineering Lab. BLUElab works toward sustainable solutions to development problems both domestically and internationally.

“Today’s engineering students are magicians at solving problems, but only a select few are capable of finding important problems and implementing economically and environmentally sustainable solutions in the real-world,” said associate professor Steve Skerlos, founder of BLUElab and associate chair in the Department of Mechanical Engineering.

­“I’m impressed with how this team of engineering students has grasped the technical as well as human and economic dimensions of this multidisciplinary design project. Their experiences in BLUElab and the Multidisciplinary Design Program will clearly place them well among the leaders and best of our undergraduates.”

 

Right prevails in Chilean elections for first time in 52 years

by the El Reportero’s news services

Sebastián PiñeraSebastián Piñera

Sebastián Piñera won election in Chile on 17 January, becoming the first right-wing presidential candidate since 1958 to come to power by the ballot box. Piñera defeated Eduardo Frei, of the ruling Concertación, which will see its 20-year stranglehold on power since the return to democracy come to an end when Piñera dons the presidential sash on 11 March. Chile was the only Latin American country not to have experienced a post-dictatorship alternation of government. Piñera’s big challenge will be preserving cohesion in his Coalición por el Cambio. He borrowed a lot of social-democratic rhetoric during his campaign and presented himself as a pragmatic centrist, but the ultra-conservative Unión Demócrata Independiente (UDI) is the senior partner in his coalition.

Bolivia’s Morales sworn in for second term

Today (22 January) Evo Morales will be sworn for a second term as president.

Morales begins his second term with a massive mandate leaving him well placed to achieve his main priority – the implementation of the new constitution which strengthens state control of the economy; enshrines indigenous rights and provides for greater decentralisation.

U.S. accused of ‘occupying’ Haiti as troops flood in

HAVANA: Retired Cuban leader Fidel Castro today called on the United Nations to assume a monitoring role in Haiti, and he decried the US military “occupation” of the quakeravaged Caribbean country.

Castro, in an opinion article published in the local newspapers, said that neither the United Nations nor Washington have given a proper explanation of the US military role in the wretchedly poor nation.

“Amid the Haitian tragedy, with no one knowing how or why, thousands of (US Marines) and paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division and other military forces have occupied Haitian territory. Even worse, neither the United Nations nor the (US government) has offered an explanation… of this movement of forces,” Castro wrote.

Castro, 83, said that the announcement of other countries to send more troops to Haiti will contribute to chaos “and complicate the international cooperation, already a complicated task.”

­In other related news: France accused the US of “occupying” Haiti on Monday as thousands of American troops flooded into the country to take charge of aid efforts and security.

The French minister in charge of humanitarian relief called on the UN to “clarify” the American role amid claims the military build up was hampering aid efforts.

Alain Joyandet admitted he had been involved in a scuffle with a US commander in the airport’s control tower over the flight plan for a French evacuation flight.

“This is about helping Haiti, not about occupying Haiti,” Mr Joyandet said.

Geneva-based charity Medecins Sans Frontieres backed his calls saying hundreds of lives were being put at risk as planes carrying vital medical supplies were being turned away by American air traffic controllers.

But US commanders insisted their forces’ focus was on humanitarian work and last night agreed to prioritise aid arrivals to the airport over military flights, after the intervention of the UN.

Blackwater charges dropped; Iraqis jeer

by Erick Galindo

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Iraqi government will pursue civil charges following U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina’s decision to throw out manslaughter charges against five former Blackwater security guards accused of killing 14 Iraqis on Sept. 16, 2007.

The decision was announced New Year’s Eve here (with time zone difference, New Year’s day in Iraq). In all, 17 Iraqis were killed and 20 wounded in the Baghdad incident.

The decision by Urbina, who sits as the first Hispanic to serve on the District of Colombia Superior Court, was met with disdain and jeers by Iraqis, many of whom view the shootings as a symbol of U.S. disregard for their lives.

Iraq called the decision “unacceptable and unjust.” It said it will ask the U.S. Justice Department to review the criminal case.

Family members of the dead and survivors called the decision a mockery of the justice that the United States was supposed to bring to their country. Officials there say the government will help victims file a lawsuit against the United States “What happened yesterday confirms that the trial was biased,” said Ali Adeeb, a top adviser to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki.

Adeeb promised the Iraqi government will put diplomatic pressure on the United States to ensure that the victims “get justice.”

The 28-year veteran of the court said prosecutors had acted inappropriately in using the guards’ statements, acquired under the auspices of immunity, as evidence.

Judge Urbana also criticized prosecutors for withholding “substantial exculpatory evidence” from the grand jury that indicted the defendants, as well as for presenting distorted versions of witnesses’ testimony and improperly telling the grand jury that some incriminating statements had been made by the defendants were being withheld.

“The explanations offered by the prosecutors and investigators in an attempt to justify their actions and persuade the court that they did not use the defendants’ compelled testimony were all too often contradictory, unbelievable and lacking in credibility,” Urbina wrote.

Prosecutors contended the guards indiscriminately fired on unarmed civilians in an unprovoked assault near a crowded traffic circle.

One of the survivors, Mahdi Abdul Khudor, who lost an eye in the shooting, said the guards burned people inside their cars. The guards claimed they had been am bushed by insurgents and they fired in self-defense.

During the investigation into the incident, the guards, State Department contract employees at the time, were told by State Department investigators that they could be fired if they did not talk to investigators about the case and that whatever they said would not be used against them in any criminal proceeding.

In his 90-page opinion, Urbina found that in a “reckless violation of the defendants’ A panel with perspectives from across the political spectrum will address this report and other studies on the economic effects of immigration reform at the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C. that morning.

Last month, U.S. Rep. Luis Gutiérrez constitutional rights,” investigators and prosecutors had extensively used those statements and disregarded “the warning of experienced senior prosecutors” that “the course of action threatened the viability of prosecution.”

­The decision is considered a major blow to the Justice Department, which has struggled to distance itself from the stigma left by former Attorney General Alberto Gonzáles. It also brings to a halt one of the highest profile prosecutions to arise from the Iraq war.

The shooting had strained relations between the Iraqi government and the Bush Administration at the time and called into question United States’ growing reliance on private security contractors in war zones.

Blackwater, the much-publicized government contractor, has since been expelled from Iraq and changed its name to Xe Services.

Many of the company’s former guards have switched to other security firms and have stayed in Iraq.

Ex IRS agent accuses the government for her eventual dead

by Marvin J. Ramirez

­Marvin  J. RamírezMarv­in R­amír­ez­­­­­­­­

For those who do not know the history of the most evil and fearful agency in the U.S., the Internal Revenue Service, know now that this is not a government agency, but a revenue collector for the privately-owned Federal Reserve Bank, which in turn is owned by the International Monetary Fund. And it all started with the bankruptcy of the United States in 1933, which is still in effect nowadays.

The history is too long to describe it now, but El Reportero will bring some light to this historical event later on when there is more space.

However, the power that the IRS has acquired since its creation, has been used against the people of the United States indiscriminately, who have been left in such a state of bankruptcy, that the American dream has been replaced with an American nightmare.

And although there is no constitutional law to force North Americans to share part of the fruit of their labor, and that the Constitution prohibits the taking of our private property (our personal income) without due process, the people live a perpetual prison where they are perpetually raped year after year without recourse and mercy, within a legal system that only serves the international bankers to collect their money they loan to the government every year – in our name, with our signature, with us as collateral. Without our signature the government can’t borrow a cent from the Federal Reserve to support their wars and their bank bailouts.

Alarmed by this criminal enterprise, a heroic woman, ex IRS agent, she went on to speak the truth about this criminal agency, and came out to denounce it in a film. And guess what? She is now in prison and dying without proper health care.

The star of the famous film, America: Freedom to Fascism, by Aaron Russo (RIP). http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1616088001333580937#, Sherry Jackson, a Black woman, is dying. She recounts her ordeal in a letter she wrote to her Congressional Representative, and which can be read at: http://www.infowars.com/america-freedom-to-fascism-star-sherry-jackson-is-being-murdered/.

Because of lack of space in this edition – as you can see, we were not able to publish it. Please read it.

The feds seem intent upon MURDERING SHERRY JACKSON. See her own report and you’ll understand. She details how the feds denied her medical care in prison and right now she IS IN THE PROCESS OF DYING.

­Sherry was one of the stars in Aaron Russo’s America: Freedom to Fascism. She was the former IRS agent who spoke out, “SHOW ME THE LAW!”

Right now she deserves the support of the entire Freedom Movement. We can give it to her by calling her Congressional Representative imploring him to intercede to save her life. For her service to the Cause of Liberty, WE SHOULD DO NO LESS!!

Sherry’s Representative is Hank Johnson, representing the 4th Congressional District of Georgia, also a Black man.

Call and fax him at each office and demand immediate medical attention for Sherry:

Washington, DC Offi ce 1133 Longworth HOB Washington, D.C. 20515 Phone: (202) 225-1605 Fax: (202) 226-0691.

Lithonia Office 5700 Hillandale Dr., Suite 110 Lithonia, GA 30058 Phone: (770) 987-2291 Fax: (770) 987-8721.

Tucker Office 3469 Lawrenceville Highway, Suite 205 Tucker, GA 30084 Phone: (770) 939-2016 Fax: (770) 939-3753.

Workers continue their demand for back wages

by Jon Rodney

Protest and demand for back wages.: (PHOTO COURTESY BY JON RODNEY, WITH EAST BAY ALLIANCE)Protest and demand for back wages.­(PHOTO COURTESY BY JON RODNEY, WITH EAST BAY ALLIANCE)

No sooner had the sun risen over the Oakland hills on Jan. 16 when protestors started gathering outside of Emeryville’s boycotted Woodfin Suites Hotel. And by about 8:00 a.m. the crowd had swelled to over 60 workers, residents, and community members.

­A court ordered Woodfin to pay up some $200,000 in back wages, owed to dozens of working immigrant mothers since approximately three years ago, and still it hasn’t paid the workers.

­

Reporters” lives – and deaths – on the Mexican border

por Alejandra Matos

EL PASO, Texas – With the constant violence in Mexico has come an increase in reporting about the ongoing drug war in Ciudad Juárez, the neighboring metropolis across the border, In 2009, more than 2,600 people were killed there. El Paso Times editor Chris López has dedicated himself to covering the turmoil ever since he joined the paper in 2009.

“This is one of the most dynamic stories on the border — and in the country,” he insists.

El Diario de El Paso, the sole Spanish-language newspaper here, also sees the importance of reporting on it because readers often have direct ties to Juárez.

“We try to cover the violence binationally. We talk to North American agencies and scholars to give their opinions on the phenomenon,” El Diario de El Paso editor Armando Vélez says.

His newspaper’s audience is comprised mainly of Mexican immigrants. For this reason, Vélez asks his reporters to cover other aspects of daily life, but incorporating how the violence is affecting them, he added.

“Anybody who says that the backdrop of the drug cartel war doesn’t impact every segment of society in Juárez is not over there talking to people,” López says. “You cannot tell a story in Juárez right now without giving it that context.”

KINT Channel 26, El Paso’s Univisión station, also showcases other elements of ­life in Juárez. Reports such as one Ariadna López did on an orphanage remind people that life still continues there, she says.

A lot of times people in El Paso would rather not watch the news or read the newspaper because they are tired of so much violence, and at the end of the day it’s the exact same story,” López says.

In 2009, 11 journalists were killed in Mexico, making it the second most dangerous country for journalists, according to the International News Safety Institute.

El Diario de Juárez lost its police reporter, Armando Rodríguez, in November 2008. Rodriguez was warming up his car, about to take his daughter to school, when he was shot.

Rather than back away, the newspaper is taking precautionary measures.

“The best homage we could give Armando was to continue with our work,” editor Rocío Gallegos says. “We’ve just been more careful. We don’t publish reporters names with articles that we feel may be threatening, or include the names of photographers.”

Karla Mariscal, a news anchor at Channel 26, lost her brother last November when he was ambushed and killed in Juárez.

Channel 26 no longer sends any of its staff to report on the crime across the border. Instead, it uses someone who lives and works out of the city. “We cannot put our people at risk. Our station has already suffered enough,” she says.

KVIA Channel 7, El Paso’s ABC station, sends its news teams into Juárez, depending on the type of story they choose to cover. They also have a reporter from the BELO Corporation based out of KVIA who reports on border issues.

“That is a great asset for us because she is also able to go back and forth and tell the border stories that we show to our viewers,” KVIA news director Brenda De Anda Swann says.

The El Paso Times consistently sends reporters into Juárez. Although safety is a concern, López says it will not stop him from sending reporters to the city.

In contrast, Vélez sends his reporters if need be but they work mainly with reporters from Juárez.

“We get the hard facts from the 20 or so reporters from El Diario de Juárez, and then we will modify the information to reflect how it affects our readers here in El Paso,” he says.

At the end of the day when the paper hits the press or the lights of the studio turn off, journalists are human beings. Although their work is important, the line has to be drawn at some point, Univisión’s Ariadna López says.

“For CNN reporters it is easy to go into Juárez, do their reports and leave to their homes in the U.S,” she says. “We on the other hand live in this community. We cross over daily and have family in Juárez. If we expose ourselves more than necessary we are going to get killed and our voice is going to be turned off.”

(Alejandra Matos is a journalism student at the University of Texas-El Paso. Contact her at amatos@miners.utep.edu)©2010