Sunday, September 1, 2024
Home Blog Page 455

A brighter future for Hispanic children

­por Janet Murguía

Manifestantes protestan la ley de Arizona que se convierte en un crimen el ser indomentados el Día Primero de Mayo.: (PHOTO BY DAVID BACON)Marchers protest the passing of the Arizona law that makes it into a crime to be undocumented in the country on May Day. (PHOTO BY DAVID BACON)

COLUMN – Every Mother’s Day, we have honored the women who nurture the hopes and dreams of families throughout the nation. This year our message has carried special meaning — to renew our focus on the number one priority of mothers everywhere —children.

Every mother looks for the future in her child’s face and, in the United States, the face of our future is increasingly Latino.

By 2035, nearly one-third of all children in the United States will be Hispanic. It is crucial to our nation that these children become productive citizens. Yet we lack the policies to allow Latino children to reach their true potential.

According to a new report by the National Council of La Raza (NCLR) and the Population Reference Bureau, America’s Future: Latino Child Well-Being inNumbers and Trends, the future of our nation is in trouble unless we take a targeted and comprehensive approach to address the challenges Latino children face.

Nearly 60 percent of Latino children are growing up in low-income or poor families, almost 20 percent of Hispanic children lack health insurance, and only 55 percent of Latino students graduate with a regular high school diploma. This is no way to prepare children so they can achieve the big dreams their mothers have for them.

Hispanic mothers have earned their worry lines. Today, too many are concerned with losing their homes and having to double up with relatives, forcing their children to attend new schools. As NCLR documented in       another recent report, The Foreclosure Generation: The Long-Term Impact of the Housing Crisis on Latino Children and Families, the current financial struggles of millions of Latino families are detrimental to their children’s ability to do well in school.

Given the unacceptably high unemployment and foreclosure rates that burden Hispanic families, we urge Congress to fast-track the creation of jobs to serve local needs in the communities hit hardest by the recession, to invest immediately in infrastructure, especially schools and public transit, and to protect the unemployed and other homeowners in distress from foreclosure.

Hispanic mothers want better lives for their children, and one way they can obtain this is by securing a quality education. We must hold our schools accountable for ensuring that children who are learning English master the same age-appropriate subject matter as their peers.

Just as Congress needs to take a comprehensive approach, so too should educators and state policymakers as they work to make schools more effective for Latino students. They should be aware of the significant differences in the challenges Hispanic children face according to which state they live in and how long their families have been in the United States. A full picture of Latino children’s well-being and circumstances in all 50 states is available at www.nclr.org/latinochildwellbeing.

The Latino population has many strengths, including cohesive families and communities, a youthful population, a commitment to the health and welfare of their children, and a strong work ethic.

­Hispanic mothers are doing all they can to keep their children on the right track. What’s missing, though, is a sense of urgency in our nation to make sure that Latino families have the opportunity to work hard, acquire a good education for their children, and build a better future for us all.

With a little help in leveling the playing field to create brighter prospects, we can turn around the troubling statistics on Latino children. Mother’s Day serves as a timely reminder that taking care of families is the best way to honor the mothers of this nation. Hispanic Link.

(Janet Murguía is president of the National Counsel of La Raza.) ©2010

 

Reduced side effects in head and neck treatment

Innovative radiation techniques reduce swallowing problems for head and neck cancer patients, improve quality of life

by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center have applied advanced radiation techniques for head and neck cancer to avoid treating critical structures that affect swallowing and eating. A new study shows these principles and techniques treated the cancer effectively while greatly reducing long-term swallowing complications.

The researchers applied highly conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the structures involved to carefully craft a novel treatment plan that a avoids certain muscles in the mouth and throat that are most involved in swallowing. Generally, head and neck tumors do not spread to these structures.

Of the 73 patients treated with this technique, all but four were eating a normal diet after their treatment ended and only one was dependent on a feeding tube. Typically up to 20 percent of head and neck cancer patients remain dependent on a feeding tube after fi nishing an intensive course of radiation treatment concurrent with chemotherapy. Results of the study appear online in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. “More aggressive treatments for head and neck cancer have improved cancer control, but at the expense of quality of life.

In this study, we did not compromise tumor control and we were able to improve this important quality of life measure,” says study author Avraham Eisbruch, M.D., professor of radiation oncology at the U-M Medical School.

Scar tissue from radiation treatments to the head and neck often creates long-term problems with swallowing and eating solid foods that do not ­improve over time. In this study, 29 percent of the patients required a temporary feeding tube during treatment because of pain while swallowing.

But by one year after treatment, only one of the 73 patients on the study still required a feeding tube. Questionnaires to assess eating and swallowing function showed that on average, patients had only slight difficulties up to two years after treatment. No patients had a spread of their cancer to the untreated structures and few cancers recurred overall, suggesting it was not harmful to avoid treating these areas. After three years, 88 percent of patients were cancer-free. Eisbruch and his colleagues were also leaders in pioneering head and neck radiation treatments that avoid the salivary glands, reducing significantly the severity of permanently dry mouth, which has previously been a major complication of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

“We seek a cure for these patients, but we also seek quality of life. As cure rates have improved in recent years, quality of life issues become more and more important. Our next steps are to identify which patients are likely to do well with treatment and reduce the intensity of treatment to limit the burden of these side effects,” Eisbruch says.

Methodology: The study looked at 73 patients with stage III or stage IV oropharyngeal cancer, including cancer of the tonsils or the base of the tongue. Patients were treated with seven weeks of daily intensity-modulated radiation therapy to the neck, designed to avoid the swallowing structures. Chemotherapy was administered weekly during this time.

Patients were assessed with videofluoroscopy, an imaging procedure, periodically during treatment and up to two years after to assess swallowing. Swallowing was also assessed by doctors and through patient report using standard questionnaires.

Head and neck cancer statistics: 35,720 Americans will be diagnosed with head and neck cancer this year and 7,600 will die from the disease, according to the American Cancer Society.

Nicaraguans could lose $2.3 million court award

by the El Reportero’s news services

Laura ChinchillaLaura Chinchilla

Six Nicaraguan banana workers who Dole Food Co. attorneys have accused of fraud will get a chance to explain their position on Tuesday when their attorneys speak before a California judge at a hearing.

The men, who claimed in the lawsuit that exposure to pesticides made them sterile, received $2.3 million after a 2007 jury verdict. But the judge in the case is considering reversing the award.

Attorneys for Dole on Monday suggested that the men were part of a ‘’fraud army’’ coached in their testimony by an American and Nicaraguan lawyer with a plan to extort billions from the giant food company in multiple lawsuits.

Judge Victoria Chaney, who has been elevated to the state appellate court since she presided over the 2007 trial, has returned to Los Angeles Superior Court to consider dismissing the verdict. The case is closely related to one that Chaney dismissed last summer on grounds of fraud.

Chinchilla takes office in Costa Rica

Laura Chinchilla became Costa Rica’s first female president on Saturday, taking the oath of office in an open-air public ceremony with thousands of supporters cheering her on.

The new president swore to uphold Costa Rica’s constitution and accepted the presidential sash that moments before had been worn by Oscar Arias, the twice elected president who won the 1987 Nobel Peace Prize for helping 5end civil wars in Central America.

The 51-year-old Arias protegee became president after winning the February 7 presidential election representing the centre-left National Liberation Party (PLN).

She is the third female president in Central America, after Violeta Chamorro of Nicaragua and Mireya Moscoso of Panama.

No Unasur-Obama meeting until members firm up a consensus

As the leaders of Unasur open their summit in Buenos Aires on May 4, there is one item they know will be absent from their agenda: an agreed schedule for their long-awaited meeting with U.S. president Barack Obama (and, consequently, a tentative date for that meeting).

It does seem clear that the US government wanted to wait and see what emerged from the summit before committing itself, particularly since Unasur has said that what it wants is to discuss the regional security implications of the U.S.-Colombia agreement on base facilities. And on this, as on other key matters, Unasur has yet to reach a solid consensus.

­Tele-presidents embrace new media in information war

Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez, who leads the way in his embrace of new media in Latin America, now has his own account on the social networking site Twitter. He immediately extolled the virtues of Twitter to his Bolivian peer Evo Morales, who he received in his home state of Barinas last week, and invited all revolutionaries to use Twitter for the “ideological battle”. Chávez pioneered a new style of presidential communication, and governance, with his weekly television and radio broadcast Aló, Presidente in 1999, since when other regional heads of state have followed his lead.

How Latin America could set China an example

The world’s biggest economic issue is how to end the undervaluation of the Chinese renminbi against the US dollar without disrupting trade and capital flows. The consquence of the undervaluation is China’s huge (dollar-denominated) trade surplus. At the moment the Chinese authorities recycle this surplus by investing in US government bonds and other securities. Another way of recyling would be to allow foreigners to borrow renminbi.

Cuba reiterated Tuesday that the unilateral making of lists by the US government accusing other countries of supposed support to terrorism is incompatible with the international right and the UN resolutions.

Police leaders share concerns about Arizona’s immigration law

by Rosalba Ruíz

Police officials from four states said that Arizona’s new immigration law, which empowers police to question the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being “unlawfully present” in the country, is a bad idea.

Members of the Law Enforcement Engagement Initiative (LEEI), an organization of police leaders advocating for immigration reform, said they would oppose similar legislation if it were proposed in their own states.

“I think this bill will have catastrophic impact on policing,” said George Gascon, San Francisco’s top cop, during a LEEI teleconference involving Hispanic Link News Service just hours before Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed the state legislation.

Law enforcement officials listed the high risk for racial profiling, a negative impact on community trust toward police and additional pressure on local police who already have limited resources as primary among reasons they oppose the law.

“(The law) does have some national ramifications,” said Richard Myers, Chief of Police in Colorado Springs, Colo., and member of LEEI. “The legislation poses yet another unfunded mission to the police that we just cannot sustain …It expects local police to engage in what is the primary mission of federal authorities.”

Myers said that one of his concerns is that other states would follow the lead.

Civil rights advocates have decried the law, citing the potential for racial profiling.

Before passage of the law, the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police voiced its position against the bill, but the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association, a police officers union, asked for the governor’s support of the bill, saying the legislation would be another tool that would assist officers “in keeping our neighborhoods safe.”

Raleigh, N. C. chief Harry Dolan, a member of LEEI, stated that while preventing crime is the role of police, solving the immigration issue is the federal government’s responsibility: “I don’t want to give a position on it. I just want to say, federal government, please step up.” Hispanic Link.

IN OTHER IMMIGRATION NEWS: Conservative Latinos now say they support immigration legislation

by Luis Carlos López

PHOENIX, Ariz. — Just as President Obama was about to reveal his intention to scuttle pursuing immigration reform this year, several conservative Latino political activists and faith-based leaders used an April 29 telephonic news conference coordinated by author/activist Juan Hernández to spread the word that there’s plenty of support among Hispanic Republicans for a comprehensive bill to be fl oated in Congress this session.

While former President George W. Bush’s Secretary of Commerce Carlos ­Gutiérrez participated as hewas waiting at an airport, ex-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was a last-minute no-show.

Hernández vaguely blamed his absence on a late “schedule change.”

Hernández read a statement by the former governor given to POLITICO the day before in which he stated that Arizona’s SB1070, signed by Gov. Jan Brewer April 23, “creates unintended consequences.” He added, “I don’t think this is a proper approach.”

Ironically, participants in the news teleconference stressed that for a reform bill to have any chance for success, President Obama must assume a much more forceful leadership role.

Stating that together they represent several hundred congregations, the half-dozen evangelical leaders were unanimous in denouncing the Arizona legislation.

Meanwhile, with the 90-day countdown beginning for Arizona’s SB1070 law to take effect, Latinos aligned with both political parties continue to call for rallies, marches, boycotts and non-violent protests nationwide on May 1 and beyond.

The law signed by Governor Brewer has already prompted two lawsuits, one coming from the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders, which fi led a complaint April 29 citing that the legislation was illegal because it undermined federal authority. Hispanic Link.

Asian Civil Rights group troubled by Immigration reform blueprint

by the Asian Law Caucus

Democrats propose flawed biometric employment verification system despite promising legalization, family provisions

SAN FRANCISCO – Yesterday, six leading Democrat Senators unveiled a framework that would overhaul our nation’s badly-outdated immigration system. The proposal, not yet a bill, prioritizes a biometric identity card for all Americans as well as increased border militarization. The blueprint also includes a pathway to legalization for undocumented immigrants and addresses the long waits in family immigration backlogs.

“Legalization is a human rights issue that the Asian American community deeply cares about,” states Titi Liu, Executive Director of the Asian Law Caucus. “Our democracy will only be strengthened when we finally address the second-class that stigmatizes undocumented immigrants living and working in the United States.”

The legalization proposal allows undocumented immigrants to obtain probationary status for eight years, which permits them to travel abroad and work in the U.S. before they could apply for a green card, provided they meet various criteria. The blueprint also modernizes the family immigration system by clearing out the backlogs over eight years. Also for the first time, the bill would permit US citizens to sponsor same sex ­partners for permanent residency.

Despite these promising provisions, the Democratic framework is undercut by severe interior and border enforcement provisions. Chief among them is the creation of a new, biometric Social Security card that all Americans will be required to show for employment eligibility. This biometric data will be stored in a database and every U.S. employer will be required to use a card reader for authentication. Additionally of concern is the proposal to increase mandatory detention and retain the flawed 287(g) program that deputizes state and local police to act as federal immigration agents.

“These provisions raise several civil liberties and privacy concerns for all Americans. Immigration reform cannot be used to encroach on basic civil rights,” says Liu. “The Democratic blueprint is only the beginning of Senate debates for fair immigration reform. More robust civic engagement and closer analysis of any legislation will be essential in the coming weeks in order to ensure that civil and human rights are respected.”

This is a crucial time for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to weigh in on the immigration debate. Historically, California has been the gateway for AAPI communities to immigrate to the US. “We must remember these journeys and move forward together with all immigrants, as the immigration debate takes center stage. AAPIs should be vocal and build momentum towards ensuring a humane immigration bill in 2010,” said Liu.

Tomorrow, May 1, International Workers’ Day, AAPIs across the country will march calling for fair and just immigration reform in solidarity with thousands of other immigrant communities. Rallies will be held in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Jose, Oakland, San Bernardino and Orange County.

In the US today, more than 60 percent of the Asian American community were born abroad. Approximately one in ten are undocumented. AAPI immigrants face some the longest waits in the family immigration system. Since 1998, nearly 50,000 Asians have been deported and more than 38,000 were removed for non-criminal reasons.

Even without Arizona’s law, firing and worse face immigrant workers

por David Bacon

SAN FRANCISCO, CA (4/20/10) — While the potential criminalization of undocumented people in Arizona continues to draw headlines, the actual punishment of workers because of their immigration status has become an increasingly bitter fact of life across the country.

In the latest move by the Department of Homeland Security, 475 immigrant janitors will soon be fired from their jobs in San Francisco.

Weeks ago, DHS went through the employment records of their employer, ABM, one of the largest building service companies in the country. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement arm of DHS sifted through Social Security records, and the I-9 immigration forms all workers have to fill out when they apply for jobs. They then told ABM that the company had to fire 475 workers who were accused of lacking legal immigration status.

ABM has been a union company for decades, and many of the workers have been there for years.

“They’ve been working in this industry for 15, 20, some as many as 27 years in the buildings downtown,” says Olga Miranda, president of Service Employees Local 87. “They’ve built homes. They’ve provided for their families. They’ve sent their kids to college. They’re not new workers.

They didn’t just get here a year ago.”

Those workers are now faced with an agonizing dilemma. Should they turn themselves in to Homeland Security, who might charge them with providing a bad Social Security number to their employer, and even hold them for deportation? For workers with families, homes and deep roots in a community, it’s not possible to just walk away and disappear. “ I have a lot of members who are single mothers whose children were born here,” Miranda says. “I have a member whose child has leukemia. What are they supposed to do? Leave their children here and go back to Mexico and wait? And wait for what?”

Miranda’s question reflects not just the dilemma facing individual workers, but of 12 million undocumented people living in the United States. Since 2005, successive Congressmen, Senators and administrations have dangled the prospect of gaining legal status in front of those who lack it. In exchange, their various schemes for immigration reform have proposed huge new guest worker programs, and a big increase in exactly the kind of enforcement now directed at 475 San Francisco janitors.

President Obama, condemning Arizona’s law that would make being undocumented a state crime, said it would “undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans.” But then he called for legislation with guest worker programs and increased enforcement.

While the country is no closer to legalization of the undocumented than it was ten years ago, the enforcement provisions of the comprehensive immigration reform proposals have already been implemented on the ground. The Bush administration conducted a high-profile series of raids in which it sent heavily armed agents into meatpacking plants and factories, holding workers for deportation, and sending hundreds to federal prison for using bad Social Security numbers. It set up a new Federal court in Tucson, Arizona, called Operation Streamline, where dozens of people are sentenced to prison every day for walking across the border.

After Barack Obama was elected President, immigration authorities said they’d follow a softer policy, using an electronic system to find undocumented people in workplaces. People working with bad Social Security numbers would be fired. As a result, last September, 2000 seamstresses in the Los Angeles garment factory of American Apparel were fired, followed by a month later by 1200 janitors working for ABM in Minneapolis. In November over 100 janitors working for Seattle Building Maintenance lost their jobs.

Ironically the Bush administration proposed a regulation that would have required employers to fire any worker who provided an employer with a Social Security number that didn’t match the SSA database. That regulation was then stopped in court by unions, the ACLU and the National Immigration Law Center. The new administration, however, is implementing what amounts to the same requirement, with the same consequence of thousands of fired workers. Meanwhile, the Operation Streamline court is still in session every day in Arizona.

“Homeland Security is going after employers that are union,” Miranda charges. “They’re going after employers that give benefits and are paying above the average.” While American Apparel had no union, it paid better than most Los Angeles garment sweatshops. Minneapolis janitors belong to SEIU Local 26, Seattle janitors to Local 6 and San Francisco janitors to Local 87.

President Obama says sanctions enforcement targets employers “who are using illegal workers in order to drive down wages — and oftentimes mistreat those workers.” An ICE Worksite Enforcement Advisory claims ­“unscrupulous employers are likely to pay illegal workers substandard wages or force them to endure intolerable working conditions.”

Curing intolerable conditions by firing or deporting workers who endure them doesn’t help the workers or change the conditions, however. And despite Obama’s notion that sanctions enforcement will punish those employers who exploit immigrants, at American Apparel and ABM the employers were rewarded for cooperation by being immunized from prosecution. Javier Murillo, president of SEIU Local 26, says, “The promise made during the audit is that if the company cooperates and complies, they won’t be fined. So this kind of enforcement really only hurts workers.”

ICE director John Morton says the agency is auditing the records of 1,654 companies nationwide. “What kind of economic recovery goes with firing thousands of workers?” Miranda asks. “Why don’t they target employers who are not paying taxes, who are not obeying safety or labor laws?”

Union leaders like Miranda see a conflict between the rhetoric used by the President and other Washington DC politicians and lobbyists in condemning the Arizona law, and the immigration proposals they make in Congress. “There’s a huge contradiction here,” she says.”You can’t tell one state that what they’re doing is criminalizing people, and at the same time go after employers paying more than a living wage and the workers who have fought for that wage.”

Renee Saucedo, attorney for La Raza Centro Legal and former director of the San Francisco Day Labor Program, is even more critical. “Those bills in Congress, which are presented as ones that will help some people get legal status, will actually make things much worse,” she charges. “We’ll see many more firings like the janitors here, and more punishments for people who are just working and trying to support their families.”

Increasingly, however, the Washington proposals have even less promise of legalization, and more emphasis on punishment. The newest Democratic Party scheme virtually abandons the legalization program promised by the “bipartisan” Schumer/Graham proposal, saying that heavy enforcement at the border and in the workplace must come before any consideration of giving 12 million people legal status.

“We have to look at the whole picture,” Saucedo urges. “So long as we have trade agreements like NAFTA that create poverty in countries like Mexico, people will continue to come here, no matter how many walls we build. Instead of turning people into guest workers, as these bills in Washington would do, while firing and even jailing those who don’t have papers, we need to help people get legal status, and repeal the laws that are making work a crime.”

Billions for the bankgsters and debt for the people

by Marvin J. Ramirez

­Marvin  J. RamírezMarv­in R­amír­ez­­­­

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: This is the seventh part of a series of the article, “Billions for the bankers – debt for the people.” The first part started with history of the United States national debt in the beginning of 1900. This second of this series of ­several parts, will show you how the control of money has played a key role into the enslaving North Americans by depraving them of owning nothing, while the bankers own everything. The third part details the events from the Depression of the 1930s to later days. The fifth part deals with Manipulating Stocks for Fun and Profit, The Interest Amount is Never Created and The Tyranny of Compount Interest. The sixth part deals with Small Loans do the Same Thing, Checking Up On Cash, and Our Own Debt is Spiraling into Infinity. El Reportero is proud to publish this article, written by Pastor Sheldon Emry for learning purposes, of the history of money in the United States.

Gambling Away the American Dream

by Pastor Sheldon Emry

To grasp the truth that periodic withdrawal of money through interest payments will inexorably transfer all wealth in the nation to the receiver of interest, imagine yourself in a poker or dice game where everyone must buy the chips (the medium of exchange) from a “banker” who does not risk chips in the game.

He just watches the table and reaches in every hour to take 10 percent to 15 percent of all the chips on the table. As the game goes on, the amount of chips in the possession of each player will fluctuate according to his luck.

However, the total number of chips available to play the game (carry on trade and business) will decrease steadily.

As the game starts getting low on chips, some players will run out. If they want to continue to play, they must buy or borrow more chips from the “banker”. The “banker” will sell (lend) them only if the player signs a “mortgage” agreeing to give the “Banker” some real property (car, home, farm, business, etc.) if he cannot make periodic payments to pay back all the chips plus some extra chips (interest). The payments must be made on time, whether he wins (makes a profit) or not.

It is easy to see that no matter how skillfully they play, eventually the “banker” will end up with all of his original chips back, and except for the very best players, the rest, if they stay in long enough, will lose to the “banker” their homes, their farms, their businesses, perhaps even their cars, watches, and the shirts off their backs!

Our real life situation is much worse than any poker game. In a poker game no one is forced into debt, and anyone can quit at any time and keep whatever he still has. But in real life, even if we borrow little ourselves from the “bankers,” our local, State and Federal governments borrow billions in our name, squander it, then confiscate our earnings via taxation in order to pay off the bankers with interest.

We are forced to play the game, and none can leave except by death. We pay as long as we live, and our children pay after we die. If we cannot or refuse to pay, the government sends the police to take our property and give it to the bankers. The bankers risk nothing in the game; they just collect their percentage and “win it all.” In Las Vegas, all games are rigged to pay the owner a percentage, and they rake in millions. The Federal Reserve bankers’ “game” is also rigged, and it pays off in billions!

In recent years, Bankers have added some new cards to their deck: credit cards are promoted as a convenience and a great boon to trade. Actually, they are ingenious devices from the seller and 18 percent interest from buyers. A real “stacked” deck!

Yes, it’s political too.

­Democrat, Republican, and independent voters who have wondered why politicians always spend more tax money than they take in should now see the reason. When they begin to study our money system, they soon realize that these politicians are not the agents of the people but are the agents of the bankers, for whom they plan ways to place the people further in debt.

It takes only a little imagination to see that if Congress had been “creating,” spending and issuing into circulation the necessary increase in the money  supply, there would be no national debt. Trillions of dollars of other debts would be practically non-existent.

Since there would be no original cost of money except printing, and no continuing costs such as interest, Federal taxes would be almost nil.

Money, once in circulation, would remain there and go on serving its purpose as a medium of exchange for generation after generation and century after century, with no payments to the Bankers whatsoever!

Boxing

Friday, May 14 — at Rancho Mirage, CA (ESPN2)

  • ­Julio Díaz vs. Herman.
  • NgoudjoDominic Salcido vs. Guillermo Sánchez.

Saturday, May 15 — at New York, NY (HBO)

  • WBA light welterweight title: Amir Khan vs. Paul Malignaggi.
  • Víctor Ortiz vs. Nate Campbell.

Saturday, May 15 — at Culiacan, México (FOX)

  • WBC lightweight title: Humberto Soto vs. Ricardo Domínguez.

Saturday, May 15 — at Ciudad Obregón, México

  • IBF featherweight title: Cristóbal Cruz vs. Orlando Salido

Three great singers performed in a one-of-a-lind concert in San Jose

by Arts news services

Marco Antonio SoliaMarco Antonio Solia

Alejandro Fernandez, Marco Antonio Solís & Joan Sebastian Los Tres Tour is a Sell Out at HP Pavillion, San Jose!!

The Gira Los Tres (Los Tres Tour) was a standing room only SELLOUT at San Jose’s HP Pavilion on when the Mexican mega stars Marco Antonio Solis, Alejandro Fernández and Joan Sebastian, took the stage on April 17 and 18, to perform in front of the crowd of singing and dancing fans. It’s a once in a lifetime tour experience produced by Live Nation. Gira Los Tres ­continues to Chicago took place last weekend for two nights at the Allstate Arena and to Houston and will again in Dallas on May 28 and 30. Don’t miss it! For tickets and more info: Livenation.com and/or giralostres.com.

HP Pavilion has hosted some of music’s biggest stars, but the Los Tres Tour is a-first-of-its kind smashing success, with the three superstars singing their biggest hits during individual sets of their own material, and also getting together throughout the night to thrill the audience and surprising the crowd with superstar pairings of classic songs. The camaraderie and friendship between the three ‘Música Mexicana’ mega-stars is evident throughout the night, and the critics are raving: “A Mexican party ….they made everyone sing, dance, laugh and even cry…..,”

Winner of the ‘51st Most Beautiful’ Contest -Yahoo! En Español and People en Español announced the winner of this year’s “51st Most Beautiful” contest. Víctor Alfredo de la Torre, an aspiring musician from Los Angeles of Mexican descent, was named the winner.

Alejandro FernándezAlejandro FernándezAlejandro FernándezAlejandro Fernández

For the third year-in-a-row, People en Español and Yahoo! The magazine teamed up to launch a nationwide search for the “51st Most Beautiful” Hispanic person to be featured in People en Español’s “50 Most Beautiful” issue. The magazine’s special annual issue highlights the 50 most popular Hispanic celebrities in TV, film and music, and the “51st Most Beautiful” person is a unique non-celebrity, like Victor, who will be featured alongside beautiful celebrities. The magazine issue will be available in newsstands on April 30, 2010.

Joan SebastianJoan Sebastian

With 58 percent of the most popular vote, de la Torre becomes the newest “Bello”, receiving a makeover and taking part in the special edition cover shoot the magazine’s “50 Most Beautiful” issue.

Sabrosa Domingos to enjoy in Oakland

by the El Reportero’s staff

Una escena de la obra Don Bartolomé Murió VirgenAn scene from the play Don Bartolomé died virgin.

Andrea Contreras presenta SABROSA DOMINGOS.

With Salsa, Rock Latino and more. Join us Every Sunday from 6 p.m. to 12 a.m. At MAXWELL’S, 341-13th Street (between Webster St. & Harrison), Oakland. For our Calendar Phone call at 415- 994-5195. Catch BART to 12th Street, Oakland. Plenty of street & garage parking.

$10 Cover, 21 + Grown, Sexy & Classy. No Sports Attire. Includes Dance Lessons by the hottest Dance Instructor Eduardo Vargas, who will get you ready to put your new moves in motion for a night of Latin Dance Music followed by Live Performances – DJ KOOL KYLE Spinning A Variety of Latin Classics Nueva Música.

In theater, Don Bartolomé Died Virgin

A theatrical comedy with touch of Mexican history. Don Bartolomé Died Virgin is an adaptation created by director Verónica Meza. The work, which was inaugurated on May 1, will keep on showing on May 8, 15, 22, 29 at 7 p.m., in the Auditorium of the National Hispanic University, 14271 Story Road, San Jose, CA 95127.

Also it will be exhibited on June 12 and 19 at 7 p.m., in the Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts, San Francisco, 2868, Mission Street, San Francisco.

Grupo Raíz in Concert

With its great repertoire of Latin-American music and of the world, the Grupo Raíz returns to the stage where 30 years ago was born to celebrate its 35 anniversary at La Peña Cultural Center. They will give tribute to the main voices of the Nueva Canción (New Song) and to celebrate with its sounds of strings and wind the legacy of the movement of solidarity of the Bay Area.

Group Raíz in Concert performed in la Peña and it went on tours along the country and internationally during the 80s. The group meets in the stage of La Peña to play in celebration of its 35 anniversary and to be introduced inducted into the Hall of Fame of La Peña.

On Saturday, May 15, at 8 p.m. $20 in advance, $25 at the door. At La Peña Cultural Center, 3105 Shattuck Ave., Berkeley. 510-849-2568. http://www.lapena.org/event/1454.

­JFK Advisor Ted Sorensen at the Commonwealth Club

Theodore Sorensen, Special Counsel & Presidential Advisor to John F. Kennedy in conversation with David Kennedy, Donald J. McLachlan Professor of History, Emeritus, Stanford University.

John F. Kennedy’s most trusted advisor, Theodore Sorensen, will break his decades of silence to recount in detail his experiences through some of the most dramatic events in American history, including the Cuban Missile Crisis, the civil rights movement, the decision to go to the moon, and his significant input into JFK’s most memorable speeches. Sorensen will give an inside look at the legacy of the Camelot Era, when some of the most important decisions in American History were made.

As special counsel to the president, Sorensen had an intimate professional and personal relationship with JFK unlike any of his colleagues. Kennedy once referred to Sorensen as his “intellectual blood bank.”

Early in his career, Sorenson helped Kennedy research and draft Profiles of Courage, which credited JFK as the author. It has now been establish that Sorensen had done much of the writing. Throughout the Kennedy administration, Sorensen served as JFK’s primary speechwriter as well has his Special Counsel & Adviser. He is perhaps best known for his work on President Kennedy’s inaugural speech which included the now indelible words, “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.”

On May 17, 2010, at 6 p.m., and at 7 p.m. book signing. At the Club Office, 595 Market Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco.