Monday, September 2, 2024
Home Blog Page 453

Statement of Hermandad Mexicana and MAPA

Compiled by the El Reportero’s staff

­Statement by Hermandad Mexicana and MAPA: The Mexican American Political Association (MAPA) and the Hermandad Mexicana Latinoamericana have been at the forefront of the advocacy to outlaw the illegal towing of vehicles of individuals solely due to the lack of a driver’s license. This practice is rampant throughout California, and municipalities have been found using vehicle towing as a budget revenue booster. It is estimated that the city of Los Angeles receives above $60 million annually from the fines and auctions of confiscated vehicles from undocumented owners.

MAPA and HML expressed delight that Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has finally agreed to a moratorium of vehicle towing and recognizes it as the equivalent of Arizona’s recently enacted law, SB1070. The mayor marched with hundreds of thousands of immigrants and their families and friends advocating for fair and humane immigration reform on Saturday, May 1st, the now traditional MAY DAY immigrant worker’s march.

“I am delighted that Mayor Villaraigosa now understands that criticism of Arizona begins at home by declaring a moratorium of the retrograde policy of illegally towing the vehicles of hard-working immigrants. It constitutes nothing short of robbery of the personal property of another, but conducted by the government under the color of law,” stated Nativo V. López.

Both organizations and many others have advocated for Mayor Villaraigosa to suspend this policy and practice due to the obvious racial profiling used by local police officers who target immigrants during vehicle check-points or the pretext of some traffic violation.

District and Teachers Union Reach Conceptual Agreement to reduce layoffs

At 6:00 p.m. today the teachers union and the school district leadership reached a conceptual agreement just as the full meeting of the Board of Education was set to begin. While the agreement has yet to be ratified by either party, the superintendent is confident that the agreement discussed between the two parties could allow the district to bring layoff numbers to below 200 positions, down from the 350 that would have to be executed without an agreement.

California law requires that final layoff notices be sent to certificated staff by May 15. Until the final agreement with the teachers union is ratified by their membership, given the legal time constraints, the district will still have to issue final notices for nearly 350 certificated positions. When this evening’s conceptual agreement is formally adopted at least 150 of these notices will be rescinded.

Senator Gloria Romero withdraws from UC Berkeley Latino graduation ceremony

AFSCME planned to strike at event if Romero attended — Sen. Gloria Romero (D-Los Angeles), Chair of the Senate Education Committee, announced today that she will refuse to cross a picket line and will honor the current boycott of the University of California campuses by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and University Professionals & Technical Employees (UPTE).

Senator Romero regretfully said that she will withdraw from attending the UC Berkeley Latino commencement celebration on Saturday, May 15, where she was scheduled to give the keynote address.

Senator Romero has made calls to the University Chancellor urging him to meet with the students and unions in order to come to a “good faith” agreement on the issues so that the graduation ceremonies would not be picketed.

Marches keep immigration reform hops flickering

­­by Rosalba Ruiz Hispanic Link News Service­

Already pronounced dead by president obama and key members of congress several times this year, immigration legislation remains alive in the souls and on the soles of millions of hispanics and other reform advocates.

Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched throughout the country may 1 to urge once again that the federal government reform the nation’s immigration laws. The april 23 passage of an arizona state law widely condemned as anti-immigrant helped fuel participation.

Advocates turned out for more than 70 international workers day events spread across 30 states. These included major rallies in los angeles, which attracted some 50,000 participants, and turnouts of additional thousands in dallas, chicago and milwaukee.

In washington, d.C., Thousands participated in protests that culminated in lafayette park in front of the white house. It was there that congressman luis gutiérrez (d-ill.) And 34 other persons were arrested for participating in a sit-in on the sidewalk in front of the white house.

“For myself, i know i am going to keep the pressure on the white house, on the leadership in my party, and on the members across the aisle. We need to get a bill passed this year,” said gutiérrez, on april 29, in response to federal immigration reform legislation outlined that day by a group of senate democrats, including majority leader harry reid of nevada and sen. Chuck schumer of new york.

This latest proposal by the democrats shows that the debate has shifted to the right, concluded a washington post analysis.

The bill emphasizes securing the border more tightly before taking steps to legalize many of the 11 to 12 million undocumented immigrants estimated to be residing in the country. Analysts told the post that the democrats’ shift underscores how, in the struggle between enforcement backers and legalization advocates, the former appeared to be gaining.

Frank sharry, executive director of america’s voice, a pro-reform organization, says that, while enforcement-heavy, the latest proposal does deal with what to do with those who lack legal status. Even if “not perfect,” the revised bill addresses issues that need to be tackled as part of the reform, he said.

But what everyone does agree on is that the immigration system has to be reformed.

According to a new york times/cbs news poll, a majority of the public thinks an overhaul is needed, including 44 percent who say the system needs to be rebuilt completely and 45 percent who say it requires fundamental changes. Only 8 percent say the system needs only minor changes.

“The american people are ready for reform. What we need is courage from the leadership now,” said felipe matos, 24, an economics student who was brought to the united states at age 14. He wants to be a teacher but his undocumented status prevents him from gaining the credential that will allow him to achieve his dream.

Matos traveled to washington from miami with a group of students who embarked on foot jan. 1 On a 1,500-mile journey. They reached the white house on may 1.

The students called their campaign the trail of dreams, in reference to the dream act, a proposal that would help undocumented immigrants who arrived in the united states at age 15 or younger to obtain legal residency.

Their hope was to give president obama a petition signed by 30,000 people to stop the separation of families through deportations.

They were instructed by white house security personnel to mail in the petition. Instead, they left their shoes behind, “the same shoes we wore the day we started walking on january first, as a symbol of thousands in our communities that disappear due to our broken immigration system,” they wrote on their blog. “This is our official statement. May first is not the end, but the beginning of a new chapter that all of us will write together!”

The grassroots immigration reform movement came to life in 2006 with huge protests, but it has seen no success yet. However, the demonstrations are helping the cause by mobilizing the community, says sharry.

The 2006 marches, with a common slogan, “today we march, tomorrow we vote,” helped generate three million new voters, he explains. In the 2008 election, four states with significant and growing hispanic populations that in 2004 were “red” states, turned “blue” — a message to politicians, sharry calls it.

“Marches and elections, lobbying and boycotts are aspects of the same movement,” he says. “If we are to have a victory … it’ll be in response to the mobilization of a community, the fastest growing group of voters. That’s why i think we have a shot to have reform this year.”

More protests and marches are being prepared throughout the summer.

(Rosalba ruíz is a reporter with hispanic link news service in washington, d.C. Email her at rpruiz @yahoo.Com) ©2010

­

We Want Amnesty

­Jorge Mújica Murias Northern Mexico

Yes, there will be amnesty and all outstanding immigration cases will be given a fair and immediate resolution. Or that we hope, because there was already was a case and that means there might be another 12 million.

The case is Barack Obama’s aunt, a woman with an almost unutterable name for us, Zeituni Polly Onyango, who came to this country in the year 2000. Two years later she requested political asylum (for fear of violence among the tribes in Kenya, since she is a member of a minority tribe,) which was refused and she was ordered to leave the country. Not strange, because the judge of the case, some Leonard I. Shapiro, has about the worst record in the country in asylum cases. Between 2004 and 2009, Shapiro rejected a 67 percent of the cases he saw, a percentage higher than the national (57%) and greater than Boston (61%), where he works.

Thus, Onyango became a fugitive from justice (or the Immigration authorities, which is not the same because they are not very just,), and became another Elvira Arellano. But the long arm of… not the law, but newspapers, cached up with her, living in Boston, a few days before the 2008 elections in a subsidized apartment. Obama declared again that he wanted a full immigration reform, and deportations were suspended during the elections so nobody could deport “by mistake,” the aunt of the guy who could be the next President of the country.

Onyango escaped again. She moved to Cleveland and hired a lawyer. Striking news is that her case was reopened, despite being a fugitive and all, and in six months she won arguing on this occasion that in case to return to Kenya because, being as she is, the aunt of the President of the United States, things could go wrong for her. Good argument, but common, because of the lack of popularity of USA in many places.

Onyango will be provided with a work permit, Social Security number, driver’s license, and she can apply for full permanent residency in a year and for citizenship in five more years.

PA ‘ your aunt and the MIA

What I say is that if you can do it for one, you can do it for 12 million. As the popular chant in the immigration marches goes, “We Want Amnesty for Your Aunty and Mine.”

For example, we want amnesty for the courageous young immigrants without papers and without fear, whom this week created a ruckus at John McCain’s office in Tucson, Ariyan-zona, sitting on the floor and stating that they were not leaving until McCain “declares its support for the DREAM Act.” Lizabeth Matthew and Mohammad Abdollahi were not only arrested, but put on deportation process.

As arguments to release them and give them work permits, social security, driver’s license and the chance to apply for permanent residence and then citizenship, would be that all that was already given Obama’s aunt. No more, no less. If needed, it can be also argued that Mohammad is gay, and in Iran, where being gay is illegal and punishable with the death penalty, there’s more reason to fear. In Mohammad’s case, is not that “things could go wrong for him” but absolute certainty they will, as Iranian laws state. At the very least, legally, Mohammad would receive “at least 100 lashes”.

The laws are clear, both here and in Iran. And the one here grant asylum for proven “fear of persecution in their native land based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a social group.”

In Lizbeth’s case, and any Mexican for that matter, in our “native land” we can be fearful for many reasons, and if someone does not believed, just go ask the recently kidnapped “Jefe Diego,” Diego Fernandez de Cevallos, former Senator and former presidential candidate. Nobody knows if he was kidnapped by the Narco, the drug dealers, or by the governing PAN, or the radical right-wing group el Yunque, or the PRI. It could even be worse for people who “suddenly become famous,” as it also argued Onyango’s lawyer. These young guys are already famous.

Of course the ultra-right fascist who govern in Arizona and have offices in Washington are already crying heaven, but as they like to say, “the law is the law” and must be respected.

The problem here is that one alone cannot open an immigration case. You have to be arrested to initiate your case. But the solution is simple: Let’s all go to Arizona and sit down in the offices of John McCain and be arrested!

mexicodelnorte@Yahoo.com.MX

Billions for the bankgsters and debt for the people (Part Nine)

­­by Marvin Ramérez

­Every Citizen Can Be A Stock Holder in America

­Marvin  J. Ramírez­Marv­in R­amír­ez­­­­­

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:­This is the nineth part of a series of the article, “Billions for the bankers – debt for the people.” The first part started with the history of the United States national debt in the beginning of 1900. This second part of this series of several parts, will show you how the control of money has played a key role into the enslaving North Americans by depraving them of owning nothing, while the bankers own everything. The third part details the events from the Depression of the 1930s to later days. The fifth part deals with Manipulating Stocks for Fun and Profit, The Interest Amount is Never Created and The Tyranny of Compound Interest. The sixth part deals with Small Loans do the Same Thing, Checking Up On Cash, and Our Own Debt is Spiraling into Infinity. The seventh part deals with Gambling Away the American Dream, which shows it is political too. The eighth part deals with Continuing Cycles of Debt and War and more. El Reportero is proud to publish this article, written by Pastor Sheldon Emry for learning purposes, of the history of money in the United States.

by Pastor Sheldon Emry

Under the Constitutional system, no private banks would exist to rob the people. Government banks under the control of the people’s representatives would issue and control all money and credit. They would issue not only actual currency, but could lend limited credit at no interest for the purchase of capital goods, such as homes.

A $100,000 loan would require only $100,000 repayment, not $270,456.00 as it is now. Everyone who supplied materials and labor for the home would get paid just as they do today, but the bankers would not get $170,456.00 in interest.

That is why they ridicule and destroy anyone suggesting or proposing an alternative system.

History tells us of debt-free and interest-free money issued by governments.

The American colonies did it through colonial script in the 1700’s. Their wealth soon rivaled that of England and brought restrictions from Parliament, which led to the Revolutionary War. Abraham Lincoln did it in 1863 to help finance the Civil War. He was later assassinated by a man many consider to have been an agent of the Rothchild Bank. No debt-free or interest-free money has been issued in America since then.

Several Arab nations issue interest free loans to their citizens today. (Now you can understand what all the commotion in the Middle East is all about, and why the banker-owned press is brainwashing American citizens to think of all Arabs as terrorists). The Saracen Empire forbade interest on money 1,000 years ago and its wealth outshone even Saxon Europe.

Mandarin China issued its own money, interest-free and debt-free. Today, historians and art collectors consider those centuries to be China’s time of greatest wealth, culture and peace.

Issuing money which does not have to be paid back in interest leaves the money available to use in the exchange of goods and services and its only continuing cost is replacement as the paper wears out. Money is the paper ticket by which transfers are made and should always be in sufficient quantity to transfer all possible production of the nation to the ultimate consumers. It is as ridiculous for a nation to say to its citizens, “You must consume less because we are short of money,” as it would be for an airline to say, “Our planes are flying, but we cannot take you because we are short of tickets”.

Citizen Control of U.S. Currency

Money, issued in such a way, would derive its value in exchange from the fact that it had come from the highest legal source in the nation and would be declared legal to pay all public and private debts.

Issued by a sovereign nation, not in danger of collapse, it would need no gold or silver or other so-called “precious” metals to back it.

As history shows, the stability and responsibility of government issuing it is the deciding factor in the acceptance of that government’s currency–not gold, silver, or iron buried in some hole in the ground. Proof is America’s currency today. Our gold and silver is practically gone, but our currency is accepted. But if the government was about to collapse our currency would be worthless.

Under the present system, the extra burden of interest forces workers and businesses to demand more money for the work and goods to pay their ever increasing debts and taxes. This increase in prices and wages is called “inflation.” Bankers, politicians and “economists” blame it on everything but the real cause, which is the interest levied on money and debt by the Bankers.

This “inflation” benefits the money-lenders, since it wipes out savings of one generation so they can not finance or help the next generation, who must then borrow from the money-lenders and pay a large part of their life’s labor to the usurer.

With an adequate supply of interest-free money, little borrowing would be required and prices would be established by people and goods, not by debts and usury.

Hundreds of union janitors fired under pressure from FBI

by David Bacon

Union members march in protest of mass firings of workers who lack proper documentation.: (BY DAVID BACON Raúl)Union members march in protest of mass firings of workers who lack proper documentation. ­(BY DAVID BACON Raúl)

­San Francisco, California – Federal immigration authorities have pressured one of San Francisco’s major building service companies, ABM, into firing hundreds of its own workers. Some 475 janitors have been told that unless they can show legal immigration status, they will lose their jobs in the near future.

ABM has been a union company for decades, and many of the workers have been there for years. “They’ve been working in the buildings downtown for 15, 20, some as many as 27 years,” said Olga Miranda, president of Service Employees Local 87. “They’ve built homes. They’ve provided for their families. They’ve sent their kids to college. They’re not new workers. They didn’t just get here a year ago.”

Nevertheless, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division of the Department of Homeland Security has told ABM that they have flagged the personnel records of those workers. Weeks ago, ICE agents sifted through Social Security records and the I-9 immigration forms all workers have to fill out when they apply for jobs. They then told ABM that the company had to fire 475 workers who were accused of lacking legal immigration status.

ABM is one of the largest building service companies in the country, and it appears that union janitorial companies are the targets of the Obama administration’s immigration enforcement program. “Homeland Security is going after employers that are union,” Miranda charged. “They’re going after employers that give benefits and are paying above the average.”

Last October, 1,200 janitors working for ABM were fired in similar circumstances in Minneapolis. In November, over 100 janitors working for Seattle Building Maintenance lost their jobs. Minneapolis janitors belong to SEIU Local 26, Seattle janitors to Local 6 and San Francisco janitors to Local 87.

President Obama said sanctions enforcement targets employers “who are using illegal workers in order to drive down wages – and oftentimes mistreat those workers.” An ICE Worksite Enforcement Advisory claimed, “unscrupulous employers are likely to pay illegal workers substandard wages or force them to endure intolerable working conditions.”

Curing intolerable conditions by firing or deporting workers who endure them doesn’t help the workers or change the conditions, however. And despite Obama’s contention that sanctions enforcement will punish those employers who exploit immigrants, employers are rewarded for cooperating with ICE by being immunized from prosecution. Javier Murillo, president of SEIU Local 26, said, “The promise made during the audit is that if the company cooperates and complies, they won’t be fined.

So this kind of enforcement really only hurts workers.”

ICE Director John Morton said the agency is auditing the records of 1,654 companies nationwide. “What kind of economic recovery goes with firing thousands of workers?” Miranda asked. “Why don’t they target employers who are not paying taxes, who are not obeying safety or labor laws?”

The San Francisco janitors are now faced with an agonizing dilemma.

Should they turn themselves in to Homeland Security, which might charge them with providing a bad Social Security number to their employer, and even hold them for deportation? For workers with families, homes and deep roots in a community, it’s not possible to just walk away and disappear. “I have a lot of members who are single mothers whose children were born here,” Miranda said. “I have a member whose child has leukemia. What are they supposed to do? Leave their children here and go back to Mexico and wait? And wait for what?”

Miranda’s question reflects not just the dilemma facing individual workers, but of 12 million undocumented people living in the United States. Since 2005, successive congress members, senators and administrations have dangled the prospect of gaining legal status in front of those who lack it. In exchange, their various schemes for immigration reform have proposed huge new guest worker programs, and a big increase in exactly the kind of enforcement now directed at 475 San Francisco janitors.

While the potential criminalization of undocumented people in Arizona continues to draw headlines, the actual punishment of workers because of their immigration status has become an increasingly bitter fact of life across the country.

President Obama, condemning Arizona’s law that would make being undocumented a state crime, said it would “undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans.” But then he announced his support for legislation with guest worker programs and increased enforcement.

 

­

New nanoscale electronic phenomenon discovered

­by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Michigan.—At the scale of the very small, physics can get peculiar. A University of Michigan biomedical engineering professor has discovered a new instance of such a nanoscale phenomenon — one that could lead to faster, less expensive portable diagnostic devices and push back frontiers in building micro-mechanical and “lab on a chip” devices.

In our macroscale world, materials called conductors effectively transmit electricity and materials called insulators or dielectrics don’t, unless they are jolted with an extremely high voltage. Under such “dielectric breakdown” circumstances, as when a bolt of lightening hits a rooftop, the dielectric (the rooftop in this example) suffers irreversible damage.

This isn’t the case at the nanoscale, according to a new discovery by Alan Hunt, an associate professor in the Department of Biomedical Engineering.

Hunt and his research team were able to get an electric current to pass nondestructively through a sliver of glass, which isn’t usually a conductor.

A paper on the research is newly published online in Nature Nanotechnology.

“This is a new, truly nanoscale physical phenomenon,” Hunt said. “At larger scales, it doesn’t work. You get extreme heating and damage.

“What matters is how steep the voltage drop is across the distance of the dielectric. When you get down to the nanoscale and you make your dielectric exceedingly thin, you can achieve the breakdown with modest voltages that batteries can provide. You don’t get the damage because you’re at such a small scale that heat dissipates extraordinarily quickly.”

These conducting nanoscale dielectric slivers are what Hunt calls liquid glass electrodes, fabricated at the U-M Center for Ultrafast Optical Science with a femtosecond laser, which emits light pulses that are only quadrillionths of a second long.

The glass electrodes are ideal for use in lab-on-a-chip devices that integrate multiple laboratory functions onto one chip just millimeters or centimeters in size. The devices could lead to instant home tests for illnesses, food contaminants and toxic gases. But most of them need a power source to operate, and right now they rely on wires to route this power. It’s often difficult for engineers to insert these wires into the tiny machines, Hunt said.

“The design of microfluidic devices is constrained because of the power problem,” Hunt said. “But we can machine electrodes right into the device.”

Instead of using wires to route electricity, Hunt’s team etches channels through which ionic fluid can transmit electricity. These channels, ten thousand times thinner than the dot of this “i,” physically dead end at their intersections with the microfluidic or nanofluidic channels in which analysis is being conducted on the lab-on a-chip. (This is important to avoid contamination.) But the electricity in the ionic channels can zip through the thin glass dead end without harming the device in the process.

This discovery is the result of an accident. Two channels in an experimental nanofludic device didn’t line up properly, Hunt said, but the researchers found that electricity did pass through the device.

“We were surprised by this, as it runs counter to accepted thinking about the behavior of non-conductive materials,” Hunt said. “Upon further study we were able to understand why this could happen, but only at the nanometer scale.”

As for electronics applications, Hunt said that the wiring necessary in integrated circuits fundamentally limits their size.

“If you could utilize reversible dielectric breakdown to work for you instead of against you, that might significantly change things,” Hunt said.

The paper is called “Liquid glass electrodes for nanofluidics.” This research is funded by the National Institutes of Health.

The university is pursuing patent protection for the intellectual property, and is seeking commercialization partners to help bring the technology to market.

Cuba’s farmers under pressure to deliver

­by the El Reportero’s news services

Raúl CastroRaúl Castro

President Raúl Castro has made food sovereignty his top priority since taking office two years ago. His government has concentrated most of its liberalization efforts on the domestic agricultural sector.

To date, the results have been mixed at best, at a time when the need is urgent. In April, following disappointing first quarter results, a fresh round of ministerial shakeups was followed in short order by a new five year plan that will assign the sector more autonomy, provide production incentives and boost competition. In short, market reforms.

EU-Latam summit sidetracked by migrants

On May 18 the VI European Union-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit concluded. Somewhat surprisingly, President Cristina Fernández de Kircher from Argentina set the tone for the final day with a heartfelt plea to European governments that they should look after Latin American migrants during the current economic downturn.

Spain’s Prime Minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, immediately responded saying that the message had been received and understood.

Latin America Remembers 115 Anniversary of José Martí”s death The legacy of the Cuban Apostle José Martí, was remembered at the School Republic of Cuba, in Asuncion, with the attendance of students, teachers and members of the Paraguayan Coordinator of Solidarity with the Island.

The Adviser Minister of the Cuban Embassy in Asuncion, Ricardo Tur Novo, evoked facets of the national hero, his insurgent struggle that bega whe e was just 17 years old, his sentence to prison been a teenager, his deportation and return to his beloved island to resume the struggle.

His thougths’ dimension are and will be the guide for the new generations of Cubans, Tur Novo said.

The Cuban ambassador in Paraguay, Rolando Gomez, and Marcia Gamarra, one of the four directors of the school, placed a wreath before Jose Marti’s bust, at the entrance of the school.

In Quito, Ecuador, with a simple but moving tribute, pupils and teachers of the Fiscal Experimental Institute José Martí today paid tribute to the Apostle of the Independence of Cuba.

Similar events took place in other Latin American countries like Venezuela and Dominican Republic.

President of Ecuador Criticizes European Migration Policies

The President of Ecuador, Rafael Correa, regarded here as terrible the migration policies applied by the 27 member countries of the European Union (EU) with the Latin American emigrants in his Wednesday intervention at the EU-Latin American and Caribbean Summit.

“I find it a historical ingratitude,” Correa expressed, and wondered what effect it had caused in Europe if Latin America had used the same policies when this part of the world received the great migratory wave during the Spanish Civil War.

I don’t know how the EU will explain the future generations, at least from an ethical point of view, that while it was enabling a global world and a bigger flow of capitals and goods, criminalized the most principal of the movements, the human one, underlined the Ecuadorian leader.

He said that the policies of the Old Continent penalize the immigration more and more, something he evaluated like a monstrous inconsistency.

Police leaders share concerns about Arizona’s immigration law

­by Rosalba Ruíz

Police officials from four states said that Arizona’s new immigration law, which empowers police to question the immigration status of anyone they suspect of being “unlawfully present” in the country, is a bad idea.

Members of the Law Enforcement Engagement Initiative (LEEI), an organization of police leaders advocating for immigration reform, said they would oppose similar legislation if it were proposed in their own states.

“I think this bill will have catastrophic impact on policing,” said George Gascon, San Francisco’s top cop, during a LEEI teleconference involving Hispanic Link News Service just hours before Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed the state legislation.

Law enforcement officials listed the high risk for racial profiling, a negative impact on community trust toward police and additional pressure on local police who already have limited resources as primary among reasons they oppose the law.

“(The law) does have some national ramifications,” said Richard Myers, Chief of Police in Colorado Springs, Colo., and member of LEEI. “The legislation poses yet another unfunded mission to the police that we just cannot sustain …It expects local police to engage in what is the primary mission of federal authorities.”

Myers said that one of his concerns is that other states would follow the lead.

Civil rights advocates have decried the law, citing the potential for racial profiling.

Before passage of the law, the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police voiced its position against the bill, but the Phoenix Law Enforcement Association, a police officers union, asked for the governor’s support of the bill, saying the legislation would be another tool that would assist officers “in keeping our neighborhoods safe.”

Raleigh, N. C. chief Harry Dolan, a member of LEEI, stated that while preventing crime is the role of police, solving the immigration issue is the federal government’s responsibility: “I don’t want to give a position on it. I just want to say, federal government, please step up.” Hispanic Link.

IN OTHER IMMIGRATION NEWS:

Conservative Latinos now say they support immigration legislation

by Luis Carlos López

PHOENIX, Ariz. — Just as President Obama was about to reveal his intention to scuttle pursuing immigration reform this year, several conservative Latino political activists and faith-based leaders used an April 29 telephonic news conference coordinated by author/activist Juan Hernández to spread the word that there’s plenty of support among Hispanic Republicans for a comprehensive bill to be floated in Congress this session.

While former President George W. Bush’s Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutiérrez participated as he was waiting at an airport, ex-Florida Gov. Jeb Bush was a last-minute no-show. Hernández vaguely blamed his absence on a late “schedule change.”

Hernández read a statement by the former governor given to POLITICO the day before in which he stated that Arizona’s SB1070, signed by Gov. Jan Brewer April 23, “creates unintended consequences.” He added, “I don’t think this is a proper approach.”

Ironically, participants in the news teleconference stressed that for a reform bill to have any chance for success, President Obama must assume a much more forceful leadership role.

Stating that together they represent several hundred congregations, the half-dozen evangelical leaders were unanimous in denouncing the Arizona legislation.

Meanwhile, with the 90-day countdown beginning for Arizona’s SB1070 law to take effect, Latinos aligned with both political parties continue to call for rallies, marches, boycotts and non-violent protests nationwide on May 1 and beyond.

The law signed by Governor Brewer has already prompted two lawsuits, one coming from the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders, which filed a complaint April 29 citing that the legislation was illegal because it undermined federal authority. Hispanic Link.

The huaraches on my wall

by­ Elisa Martínez

­EL PASO, Texas – I have a great looking pair of Mexican leather sandals — huaraches — hanging on the wall in my den. My daughter Analissa and I were enticed by their distinctive charm in an open-air market in Guanajuato, Mexico, many years ago. We each bought a pair.

She wore hers forever. I never wore mine because they weighed a ton.

But they remain permanent fixtures on my den wall and a source of good conversation, once my friends from north of the border learn to pronounce them.

Wah-RAH-chess.

“Why are those shoes on your wall?” they want to know.

Most Mexicans (except a few snooty city folk who don’t care for anything Indio) have at least one pair of huaraches. Frida Kahlo probably had more.

She wore them wherever she went.

They do beautifully in dirt, water, mud, cement or any other walking surface. They are standard wear, especially in this border city of El Paso.

You can even find them on babies’ tiny feet.

Even the mini ones can carry big cultural messages. In his autobiography “From the Barrio to Washington,” Armando Rodríguez relates a clash he and other Chicano movement pioneers had with Washington bureaucrats at what was to be a ground-breaking Mexican-American conference set up by the Lyndon Johnson White House. Frustrated by the event’s indifferent planning by the Equal Opportunity Commission staff and low-level participation of its officials, all of the three dozen invited Mexican-American participants walked out in protest as the conference was about to start.

Their walkout made national news. Later, a banquet was held in Los Angeles in support of their defiance. At it, those who walked out were presented with mini-huarache lapel pins bearing the printed message, “I walked.”  Soon thereafter, five of the walkout leaders were invited to the White House to help frame future Hispanic programs.

Huarache power!

When I was young, I wore huaraches all the time. I would put them on new and then soak my feet in water. A perfect fit when they dried, stretching just right to every fold of my feet.

The rarámuri (Tarahumara Indians) have made their running huaraches famous. They can go for miles and never quit. They have been on feet that won marathons here in the United States. The story is told that the rarámuri once were invited to participate in the Olympics but they declined because they just couldn’t perform as well in the running shoes authorized for the Games.

Huaraches are almost indestructible. They take years of hard wear and scuffing. You can buy them for a few dollars in public mercados throughout Mexico.

Most are crafted by hand. The uppers are cut and sewn with an artisan’s skill and attached to a sole made of junked automobile tires. While they will scuff your floors with nasty black marks, they won’t skid on wet pavement.

Usually they’re a light brown color. Some zapateros may dye them black or red. One time I was tempted by a pair of shiny green ones, but I feared my feet might turn the same shade.

Recently I saw an eye-catching ad in The New York Times. “HOT!” it said in pink and orange letters under a picture of a disheveled, sexy-looking girl. “The huarache sandal…Be a Bohemian!” It listed appropriate articles of clothing to complete the LOOK.

Bienvenido to the world of designer huarache sandals.  They come in great colors like walnut, cognac and chestnut. The designers’ names are written in bold letters. While the prices, up to $298.00, are excruciating, if you’re on a budget, there’s a bargain model for $98.00.

Wow, how we’ve gone up in the world!

I’m sitting here thinking of all the Mexican creations in clothing styles and music and foods that are so “in” now and wonder why so many people want Mexicans “out.” Hispanic Link News Service.

(Elisa Martínez, a lifelong transborder resident and retired teacher, has contributed columns to Hispanic Link for more than a quarter century. Email her at emar37@flash.net.

Billions for the bankgsters and debt for the people (Part Ten)

­­por Marvin Ramírez

­Citizen Control and Creating a Debt-Free America

­Marvin  J. Ramírez­Marv­in R­a­mír­ez­­­­­

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: This is the tenth part of a series of the article, “Billions for the bankers – debt for the people.” The first part started with the history of the United States national debt in the beginning of 1900. This second part of this series of several parts, will show you how the control of money has played a key role into the enslaving North Americans by depraving them of owning nothing, while the bankers own everything. The third part details the events from the Depression of the 1930s to later days. The fifth part deals with Manipulating Stocks for Fun and Profit, The Interest Amount is Never Created and The Tyranny of Compound Interest. The sixth part deals with Small Loans do the Same Thing, Checking Up On Cash, and Our Own Debt is Spiraling into Infinity. The seventh part deals with Gambling Away the American Dream, which shows it is political too. The eighth part deals with Continuing Cycles of Debt and War and more. The eighth part deals covers Every Citizen Can Be A Stock Holder in America and Citizen Control Of U.S. Currency. El Reportero is proud to publish this article, written by Pastor Sheldon Emry for learning purposes, of the history of money in the United States.

by Pastor Sheldon Emry

If the Congress failed to act, or acted wrongly in the supply of money, the citizens would use the ballot or recall petitions to replace those who prevented correct action with others whom the people believe would pursue a better money policy. Since the creation of money and its issuance in sufficient quantity would be one of the few functions of Congress, the voter could decide on a candidate by his stand on money and other legitimate functions of the Federal government, instead of the diversionary issues which are presented to us today. All other problems, except the nation’s defense, would be taken care of in the State, County, or City governments where they are best handled and most easily corrected.

An adequate national defense would be provided by the same citizen- controlled Congress, and there would be no bankers behind the scenes, bribing politicians to spend billions of dollars on overseas military adventures which ultimately serve the schemes of international finance.

Creating a Debt-Free America

With debt-free and interest-free money, there would be no direct confiscatory taxation and our homes would be mortgage-free without approximately $10,000-per-year payments to the bankers. Nor would they get $1000 to $3000 per year from every automobile on our roads.

We would need far fewer financial “help” in the form of “easy payment” plans, “revolving” charge accounts, loans to pay medical or hospital bills, loans to pay taxes, loans to pay for burials, loans to pay loans, nor any of the thousand and one usury bearing loans which now suck the life blood of American families.

Our officials, at all levels of government, would be working for the people instead of devising capers which will place us further in debt to the bankers. We would get out of entangling foreign alliances that have engulfed us in four major wars and scores of minor wars since the Federal Reserve Act was passed.

A debt-free America would leave parents with more time to spend raising their children. The elimination of the interest payments and debt would be the equivalent of a 50 percent raise in the purchasing power of every worker. This cancellation of interest-based private debts would result in the return to the people of $300 billion yearly in property and wealth that currently goes to banks.

Controlling Public Debate and Opinion

We realize that this small, and necessarily incomplete, article on money may be charged with oversimplification. Some may say that if it is that simple the people would have known about it, and it could not have happened.

But this conspiracy is as old as Babylon, and even in America it dates far back before the year 1913.

Actually, 1913 may be considered the year in which their previous plans came to fruition, opening the way for complete economic conquest of our people. The conspiracy is powerful enough in America to place its agents in positions as newspaper publishers, editors, columnists, church ministers, university presidents, professors, textbook writers, labor union leaders, filmmakers, radio and television commentators, politicians ranging from school board members to U. S. presidents, and many others.

These agents control the information available to our people. They manipulate public opinion, elect whomever they want locally and nationally, and never expose the crooked money system. They promote school bonds, expensive and detrimental farm programs, “urban renewal,” foreign aid, and many other schemes which place the people more deeply in debt to the bankers.

Thoughtful citizens wonder why billions are spent on one program and billions on another which may duplicate it or even nullify it, such as paying some farmers not to raise crops, while at the same time building dams or canals to irrigate more farm land. Crazy or stupid?

Neither. The goal is more debt. Thousands of government-sponsored methods of wasting money go on continually. Most make no sense, but they are never exposed for what they really are: siphons sucking our Nation’s economic lifeblood. Billions for the bankers, debts for the people.