Thursday, October 31, 2024
Home Blog Page 368

U.S. and Israel planning joint attack on Iran

by Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com

The Jerusalem Post reports today that the United States and Israel are planning a joint military operation to take out Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities.

The report appeared in Foreign Policy following a speech by presidential candidate Mitt Romney on foreign policy, including Obama’s stance on Iran.

“Iran today has never been closer to a nuclear weapons capability,” Romney said in a foreign policy address delivered at the Virginia Military Institute. “And it has never acted less deterred by America.”

CFR member and visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, David Rothkopf, reported that the White House and Israeli officials “assert that the two sides behind the scenes have come closer together in their views [regarding Iran] in recent days.”

According to the Post, Rothkopf quoted a “source close to the discussions” as saying that a surgical strike aimed at Iran’s enrichment facilities “might take only ‘a couple of hours’” at best and would be conducted by air using bombers and drones.

“Advocates for this approach,” according to Rothkopf, “argue that not only is it likely to be more politically palatable in the United States but, were it to be successful – meaning knocking out enrichment facilities, setting the Iranian nuclear program back many years, and doing so without civilian casualties – it would have region wide benefits. One advocate asserts it would have a ‘transformative outcome: saving Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, reanimating the peace process, securing the Gulf, sending an unequivocal message to Russia and China, and assuring American ascendancy in the region for a decade to come.’”

In addition to its nuclear program, the United States has stated it will attack Iran’s civilian population.

The U.S. is “reluctantly” considering additional covert action against Iran, according to the Christian Science Monitor. The plan calls for air strikes on power plants and other sites “that could impact Iranian civilian populations.”

In August, Richard Silverstein, who specializes in reporting on the Israeli national security state, posted a leaked document revealing details on the Israeli plan to strike Iran. The document states that Iran’s “internet, telephones, radio and television, communications satellites, and fiber optic cables leading to and from critical installations – including underground missile bases at Khorramabad ­and Isfahan – will be taken out of action” by the Israelis.

The nuclear reactor at Arak and the nuclear fuel production facilities at Isfahan will be targeted, according to the document. Other toxic chemical targets will be destroyed including “missile silos, storage tanks for chemical components of rocket fuel, industrial facilities for producing missile control systems, centrifuge production plants and more.”

In November, Eli Lake, writing for The Daily Beast, cited current and former U.S. intelligence officials who said Israel’s target list includes Iran’s electric grid, internet, cellphone network, and emergency frequencies for firemen and police officers.

“The existence of a program designed to cripple crucial civilian infrastructure not related to Iran’s nuclear program reveals that the Israeli-U.S. plan is to reduce the country to a Stone Age condition much the same way Iraq was leveled in 2003,” we wrote at the time.

On Oct.5, we reported on a report released by the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah delving into the human and environmental consequences of an Israeli military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities.

“In our assessment, it is highly likely that the physical and thermal casualties as the result of the strikes will exceed 5,000 personnel at the nuclear sites. The secondary civilian casualties as a result of exposure to the release of toxic and radioactive materials could increase this number to over 80,000 citizens,” the executive summary states.

If the Foreign Policy report is correct, it now appears Israel and the United States may be ready to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities and produce a catastrophe that would rival Chernobyl in their toxic and deadly effects.

Seven ways to use honey for whatever ails you

by J. D. Heyes

Lots of us may like to use a little honey as a sweetener for our morning coffee, toast or tea, but there are several uses for this tasty little treat – in its pure, raw, non-pasteurized form, it can do more than just bring a smile to our face.

Manuka honey as the new ‘superfood.’ What is Manuka honey, scientifically known as Leptospermum Scoparium?

Well, it is honey that is produced by bees that pollinate Manuka trees, which grow almost exclusively in the East Cape region of New Zealand. Because it’s a bit of a rarity, it also tends to be pricier but according to Britain’s Telegraph newspaper, a recent survey of people who bought it showed that 58 percent believed

The island of the widows in Nicaragua it to be better than ordinary honey – even if they didn’t really know why. This might be why. Manuka honey has a long reputation for offering a number of health benefits.

For New Zealanders, local honey containing local pollen can help reduce the effects of hay fever, but for everyone else, Manuka honey has antiviral and antibacterial actions, which is why lots of people familiar with this superfood’s qualities down it at the first hint of a cold or sore throat.

“According to doctors, Manuka honey’s high sugar content creates a waterless environment in which the bacteria that are infecting a wound are unable to survive.

Also, thanks to the presence of an enzyme called glucose oxidase, it is acidic, which apparently adds to its unique antibacterial properties,” the Telegraph said.

“The therapeutic potential of uncontaminated, pure honey is grossly underutilized,” says Peter Molan, director of the Honey Research Unit at the University of Waikato in New Zealand.

“It is widely available in most communities and although the mechanism of action of several of its properties remains obscure and needs further investigation, the time has now come for conventional medicine to lift the blinds off this ‘traditional remedy’ and give it its due recognition.”

Honey as a natural energy booster. Do you down an energy bar or drink during your hectic day? Try a spoonful of honey instead; it’s been proven to deliver a significant boost of energy to athletes performing strenuous exercise.

“Numerous studies have singled out carbohydrates as a critical nutrient in endurance exercise,” says Richard Kreider of the University of Memphis Exercise and Sport Nutrition Laboratory. “Most of the studies to date have shown supplementation with glucose to provide the extra staying power. We were pleased to find that honey, a ‘cocktail’ of various natural sugars, performed just as well.”

Forget the fancy facial creams. Raw honey is exceptional for your face and skin, according to research. Try a “Gentle Honey Wash” consisting of a dollop of honey mixed with two tablespoons of warm water in the palm of your hand, then gently massage the mixture into your face or skin. “Honey has long been valued in Asia for its natural medicinal properties.

Combined with rice bran, honey is used there to treat diaper rash and even acne. Honey is also an excellent treatment for dry skin as it stimulates good circulation and helps to seal in moisture,” says holistic skin care expert Ettia Tal.

You can even make your own honey moisturizer, says travel and food writer Anna Brones: “If you’ve got a handful of sweet smelling herbs — think lavender — laying around and ready to be used, why not use them for your own homemade honey lotion? Warm honey over a saucepan until it gets to a liquid consistency. Pour honey over herbs and cap tightly; the ratio you want to use is one tablespoon of herbs per eight ounces of honey. Let sit for a week and then mix one teaspoon of liquid into an eight ounce bottle of unscented lotion.” Having trouble sleeping?

“A spoonful of honey before bed (by itself or in a cup of warm herbal tea) is a natural sleep remedy that can help you relax and fall asleep faster,” writes Natural News’ Elizabeth Walling. Suppress that cough and throat irritation. Pure, non-pasteurized honey is an excellent elixir for common wintertime ailments like coughs, colds and sore throats.

“Honey helps with coughs, particularly buckwheat honey. In a study of 110 children, a single ­dose of buckwheat honey was just as effective as a single dose of dextromethorphan in relieving nocturnal cough and allowing proper sleep,” writes health enthusiast and researcher Diana Herrington.

Boost your immune system with this natural antibiotic. According to recent research, defensin-1, a protein added to honey by bees, possesses antibacterial properties and could be used against drug-resistant bacteria.

This bee-produced protein “could one day be used to treat burns and skin infections and to develop new drugs that could combat antibiotic-resistant infections,” says a summary of the research published in the Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Balance the five elements “Honey has been used in ayurvedic medicine in India for at least 4000 years and is considered to affect all three of the body’s primitive material imbalances positively,” says Herrington.

“It is also said to be useful useful in improving eyesight, weight loss, curing impotence and premature ejaculation, urinary tract disorders, bronchial asthma, diarrhea, and nausea.”

This may be the United States, but don’t automatically asume you can vote

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin J. Ramirez

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR: Ready for the election? Well, you must be ready, but is the ballot system ready for you? The following article, This may be America but don’t automatically assume you can vote, written by journalist Donna Anderson may bring some light to your expectations when you go to the polls. And even though there is no option for whom to vote for, at least there shouldn’t be any obstacles to voting for your candidate.

by Donna Anderson
Infowars.com

This is still America and everyone has the Constitutional right to cast their vote on Election Day but only 20 states will allow you to cast your vote without providing at least minimal identification, and most of them are working toward rectifying that situation even as we speak.

Election Day is Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2012, and the last day to register to vote is Tuesday, Oct. 9. With most states enacting stricter voter registration laws, it’s imperative that you make sure you’re registered as early as possible to allow time to gather up the necessary documents.

If you believe you’re already registered, think again. Almost every state in the Union has either changed their registration requirements or they have some type of voter registration legislation pending. If you’re planning to step up to the poll and make a difference with your vote, then you need to make sure your vote will be counted.

The single most important requirement across all states requiring voter ID is a state issued photo ID. That’s not to say that a photo ID is the only requirement, so again, don’t assume anything. To find out the exact voting requirements in your state visit the National Conference of State Legislatures website.

For the average American it would seem easy enough to get a driver’s license or some other form of photo ID that would be acceptable. But as Melissa Harris-Perry of MSNBC pointed out in her program on September 22, it’s not as easy as you might think.

According to Harris-Perry, restricted voting laws make it difficult for people of certain groups to qualify. The elderly, disabled, people of color, and students, in particular, are the groups least likely to have government issued ID. But in many cases, “Laws requiring a voter’s legal name to match the name on their photo ID could pose a problem at the polls for women who’ve changed their name through marriage or divorce. Women face considerable barriers to even getting a valid ID.”

Recent legislation passed in Pennsylvania makes it even tougher for women to vote. According to Harris-Perry, if you’re a man it’s easy. If your name is Joseph E. Voter your name can show up as Joe or J or Earl and that’s acceptable. But if you’re a woman, you need to provide proof using your legal name.

In the U.S. women change their name in 90 percent of marriages and divorces. Additionally, 52 percent of women age 18 and over don’t have their legal name on the birth certificate, and 34 percent of voting age women don’t have proof of citizenship under their legal name. An alarming 34 percent of voting age women with access to proof of citizenship have no documents with their current legal name, which means that as many as 32 million women without these documents will not be able to vote.

Elderly African American women are hit hardest, especially in large metropolitan areas. They may never have learned to drive so they won’t have a driver’s license. They may not have a birth certificate because they were born in segregated hospitals. And their name may have changed because they were married and divorced.

During the 2008 election almost one million more women turned out at the polls than men. If the same thing happens this year, these stricter voting laws can cancel out a lot of those votes and have a major effect on the outcome.

Each of the fifty states has its own voter registration laws. These laws are being enacted supposedly to prevent voter fraud but they’re really being used to manipulate election results, which is why it’s so important that you check to make sure you meet all the requirements – even if you’ve been registered for years. But registration requirements aren’t the only things that have changed.

In 32 states and the District of Columbia, any qualified voter may cast an early vote during a pre-designated period prior to Election day. However, you can’t just walk in and say you want to cast your vote, you still need to be registered, although some states allow you to register at the same time you’re casting your early vote. In some states you have to have a verifiable reason for why you want to vote early, such as a military assignment or a medical reason. Early voting periods can vary from state to state.

If you’re in the military or for whatever reason you reside in another state or country during part of the year you can request an absentee ballot. All states allow absentee voting however, in 21 states an excuse is required, while 27 states and the District of Columbia permit any qualified voter to vote by absentee ballot without offering an excuse. In eight states and the District of Columbia you can be issued a permanent absentee ballot so you never have to go to the polls again.

Of course, passing all of your state’s voter requirements and stepping up to the poll to actually cast your vote still doesn’t mean your vote will be counted, or that it’ll be counted properly.

Polls are open from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. on Election Day and anyone standing in line at 6 p.m. is guaranteed the opportunity to vote.

However, in most states the polls officially close at 8 p.m. It’s up to the discretion of each polling place whether or not they want to extend the hours beyond 8 p.m. But if they do and you cast your vote after 8 p.m. you’ll be forced to use a provisional ballot, which means your vote probably won’t ever be counted. If you don’t meet the voter registration requirements of your state you’ll also be issued a provisional ballot, assuming of course they actually let you vote.

Provisional ballots are kept separate from the regular ballots and the theory is that they are eventually counted, whether they change the results of the election or not. However, they’re only counted if you return to verify your eligibility within 2 or 3 days, depending on the state, if they’re counted at all. Only those provisional ballots deemed eligible are then counted on the second Wednesday after the election, and we all know how much weight they carry. More often than not the winner is declared before the polls even close.

It might seem prudent to vote early or use an absentee ballot, or even vote by mail if it’s available in your state. That way you can assure your vote will be there well before the deadline and it’ll be included in the count.

­But it’s important to note that unless there’s a challenge to the count, your vote might be left sitting in a mail bag in the back room of some warehouse and never get counted. And if there is a challenge and those mailbags are opened, your vote may be discounted for any number of reasons and you’ll never know about it.

Contrary to popular opinion, there is no oversight committee that stands there in the mail rooms manually checking and rechecking every single mail-in vote cast during an election. In some states you can ask for verification that your mail-in vote was counted but there’s really no way for you to be sure, or to even be sure that it was counted as a vote for the candidate you chose.

Donna Anderson writes for Examiner.com.

Third-party candidate on the ballot in 50 states, files lawsuit

Demands inclusion in presidential debates

Gary JohnsonGary Johnson

Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate for President – who is currently polling at around 5 percent of the vote – and his vice presidential running mate, retired Judge Jim Gray, have filed an antitrust lawsuit against the Democrats, Republicans, & the Commission on Presidential Debates for antitrust and anti-competitive acts. The voters deserve competition! The lawsuit comes after the PDC’s failure to respond to the following letter from Johnson last month:

Dear [Commission Member]

I am writing to request that the national Commission on Presidential Debates reconsider your current exclusionary requirements for participation in this fall’s Presidential and Vice-Presidential debates.

I am well aware of the history and genesis of the Commission, including the reality that it was created largely by the respective national leadership of the Democrat and Republican Parties. While I respect and understand the intention to provide a reasonable and theoretically nonpartisan structure for the presidential debate process, I would suggest that the Commission’s founding, organization and policies are heavily skewed toward limiting the debates to the two major parties.

Many credible polls indicate that a full 1/3 of the electorate do not clearly identify with either of those parties. Rather, they are independents whose voting choices are not determined by party affiliation. That 1/3 of the voters, as well as independent-thinking Republicans and Democrats, deserve an opportunity to see and hear a credible “third party” candidate. I understand that there are a great many “third party” candidates, and that a line must be drawn somewhere. However, the simple reality of our Electoral College system draws that line in a very straightforward and fair way – a reality that is reflected in your existing criteria. If a candidate is not on the ballot in a sufficient number of states to be elected by the Electoral College, it is perfectly logical to not include that candidate in a national debate. If, on other hand, a candidate IS on the ballot in enough states to be elected, there is no logic by which that candidate should be excluded.

Nowhere in the Constitution or in law is it written that our President must be a Democrat or a Republican. However, it IS written that a candidate must receive a majority of the votes – or at least 50% – cast by electors, and that any candidate who does so, and otherwise meets the Constitution’s requirements, may be President.

As the Libertarian Party’s nominees for Vice-President and President, Judge Jim Gray and I have already qualified to be on the ballot in more than enough states to obtain a majority in the Electoral College, and we are the only candidates other than the Republican and Democrat nominees to have done so.

However, the Commission has chosen to impose another requirement for participation: 15% in selected public opinion polls. Unlike your other requirements, this polling performance criterion is entirely arbitrary. Requiring a certain level of approval in the polls has nothing to do with fitness to serve, experience or credibility as a potential President. Rather, it has everything to do with the hundreds of millions of dollars available to and spent by the two major party candidates, the self-fulfilling bias of the news media against the viability of third party candidates, and an ill-founded belief that past dominance of the Republican and Democrat Parties should somehow be a template for the future.

It is not the proper role of a non-elected, private and tax-exempt organization to narrow the voters’ choices to only the two major party candidates. To the contrary, debates are the one element of modern campaigns and elections that should be immune to unfair advantages based upon funding and party structure. Yet, it is clear that the Commission’s criteria have both the intent and the effect of limiting voters’ choices to the candidates of the two major parties who, in fact, created the Commission in the first place.

­Eliminating the arbitrary polling requirement would align the Commission’s procedure for deciding who may participate in the critical debates with fairness and true non-partisanship, and it would not disrupt the process or make it unmanageable. Rather, it would simply allow the participation of a two-term governor who has more executive experience than Messrs. Obama and Romney combined, who has garnered sufficiently broad support to be on the ballot in more than enough states to achieve a majority in the Electoral College, and who, without the help of party resources and special interests, has attracted enough financial support to qualify for presidential campaign matching funds.

I urge you to remove the partisanship from the debates, and allow the voters an opportunity to hear from all of the qualified candidates – not just those who happen to be a Democrat or a Republican.

Thank you.

Governor Gary Johnson

Know your propositions

Your “yes” vote on one California proposition can save public education; a “no” vote on another can protect workers

by Zenei Cortez

Are you one of those voters who is absolutely sure for whom you are going to vote on November 6? Great!

Do you know how you are going to vote on the 11 propositions that will also be on the California ballot this year? If not, don’t worry. There is still time to study them and be an informed voter when you get into the ballot box.

What are propositions and why should you care?

In California, a ballot proposition is a proposed law that is presented to the voters for approval in a direct election. It can be a constitutional amendment or an ordinary statute. The California State Legislature can introduce propositions. But in a great example of what a democracy is, any California voter can put an initiative or proposition on the ballot if the qualifying steps are followed.

Now, if you are thinking, “I don’t have time to waste on figuring out my vote on the propositions. What difference does it make anyway?” Consider the following.

As far back as 1912, a proposition to abolish the death penalty failed to garner enough votes to pass. In 1979, there were 39 initiatives on the ballot and only three passed!

If you want an example that hits closer to home, consider Proposition 209, the California Civil Rights Initiative, which was passed in November 1996. It amended the state constitution to prohibit state government institutions from considering race, sex or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public constitution (think state college enrollment), public employment or public contracting.

And then there was Proposition 227, known as the English for the Children Initiative, which was passed in 1998. It effectively dismantled bilingual education in the state. This despite research that continues to show that bilingual works.

This year, two ballots demand your attention, and we hope your “yes” and “no” vote.

Proposition 30—the Schools and Local Public Safety Protection Act

Proposition 30 prevents $6 billion in schools cuts, puts money back into California’s schools and colleges, and protects students by keeping the school year from being shortened and class sizes increased. It also keeps cops on the street, balances the state budget and protects taxpayers and protects patient safety standards. Vote “YES” on Proposition 30.

Proposition 32—the Paycheck Protection Initiative

Proposition 32 is an attack on labor. It poses a threat to minimum wage, retirement pay, health care benefits, Workmen’s Compensation and many more workers’ safeguards. As written, proposition 32 effectively removes the right of unions to raise money for political campaigns in California. It only serves the very rich and large corporations. Vote ”NO” on Proposition 32.

To learn more about all of this year’s propositions, visit the California Secretary of State Web site: ­http://voterguide.sos.ca.gov.

Zenei Cortez is the Co-President of the California Nurses Association and Vice President of National Nurses United with 185,000 members across the USA.

Jennifer’s upcoming series The Fosters being condemned by ‘One Million Moms’ group

­

by the El Reportero’s news services

Jennifer LópezJennifer López

The seemingly always-outraged group known as One Million Moms now has its sites set on Jennifer Lopez, or rather, her new ABC Family show “The Fosters”, because it follows “a lesbian couple and their diverse family.”

Though the show has yet to air a single episode or even film the pilot, the premise is enough to enrage the conservative watchdog group.

In a released statement, One Million Moms accused ABC of having “lost their minds” for continuing to grow the list of so-called “anti-family programs.

One Million Moms was also the group behind the protest of JC Penney when the company announced openly gay Ellen DeGeneres as a new spokesperson.

A portion of Christian groups latest statement:

ABC Family reported the comedy-drama pilot, working with the title “The Fosters,” is about two women raising a “21st century,” multi-ethnic mix of foster and biological kids. While foster care and adoption is a wonderful thing and the Bible does teach us to help orphans, this program is attempting to redefine marriage and family by having two moms raise these children together. One Million Moms is not sure how the explanation will be given on how the biological children were conceived. None of this material is acceptable content for a family show.

Hollywood is continuing to push an agenda that homosexuality is acceptable when scripture states clearly it is a sin. As Christians, the Bible also says that we must speak up against sin. If we remain silent then we are guilty of sin also.

Lopez will be an executive producer for the hour-long project.

­Casting has not been announced. It’s still in the pilot stage and hasn’t been picked up for a series yet. Let’s stop this dead in it its tracks.

One Million Moms is asking supporters to help write to ABC Family and urge them not to air programs such as Lopez’s which they claim promote anti-family agendas. They are also asking advertisers to pull commercials from the network as well.

The group has also taken issue with Skittles commercials, TV Land’s “The Soul Man”, ABC’s “666 Park Avenue”, Urban Outfitters stores, NBC’s “The New Normal”, Gap stores, both DC and Marvel Comics, and many other stores, ads, and programs.

Artists Unite to Save Argentina’s Endangered Patagonia Bird

Argentine actor Ricardo Darin and musician-composer Gustavo Santaolalla have collaborated on a documentary aimed at saving from extinction an endangered bird species endemic to Argentina.

“El Ocaso del Maca Tobiano” (Twilight of the Hooded Grebe) is the title of the documentary narrated by Darin – who had a starring role in “Son of the Bride” – with music by Santaolalla, who won back-to-back Oscars for the soundtracks of “Babel” and “Brokeback Mountain,” and who has joined the conservation campaign launched by the ecological organization Aves Argentinas (Argentine Birds).

The documentary is directed by the naturalists and documentary filmmakers Marcelo Viñas and Juan Maria Raggio and, according to the Argentine portal Infobae, will premiere Oct. 9 in Buenos Aires movie theaters and can later be seen on the Internet by registering with the Web site set up by the campaign.

The hooded grebe is a bird found in lakes and lagoons of Patagonia between November and March, and which migrates to the Atlantic coast for the Southern Hemisphere winter. (Reported by Hispanically Speaking News).

Bats: Beyond mith and mistery

­by the El Reportero’s staff

Diego el Cigala (al centro -at center)Diego el Cigala (al centro -at center)

Conservation Speaker Series – Bats are the only mammal that can truly fly. They are the second largest group of mammals and can be found on every continent except Antarctica. Learn more about these fascinating creatures, their unique biology, and why there really is no reassure to fear them.

Join Oakland Zoo keepers as they talk about bats, myths, conservation, and the special care the Zoo’s bats receive. Program Fee: $10-$20 sliding scale. Tickets at the door. Oakland Zoo is located at 9777 Golf Links Road, Oakland, California. On Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, 6:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m. www.oaklandzoo.org.

Spanish Gypsy singer just nominated for his third Latin GRAMMY Bay Area debut

The Bay Area is thrilled with the news of Diego el Cigala’s much anticipated debut here this Fall. Noted as a pioneer for his unique approach to Latin American music forms such as the bolero, tango and Afro-Caribbean jazz, Cigala has deep roots in the culture of Spanish Gypsy flamenco.

And then he went on to win another for a more flamenco-oriented CD “Picasso en Mis Ojos” which featured guests such as the legendary Paco de Lucia and Latin jazz master Jerry Gonzalez. Returning to the bolero, his 2008 project “Dos Lagrimas” united him with giants of Cuban percussion Tata Guines and Changuito and established his ongoing collaboration with the musicians who will be appearing with him at Zellerbach: guitarist Diego del Morao, pianist Jaime Calabuch Jumitus, percussionist Sabú Porrina and Cuban bassist Yelsy Heredia.

This is Cigala’s first major North American tour and will include stops in Los Angeles, Berkeley, Miami, Chicago, Detroit, Vancouver, Toronto and New York City from October 20 through November 6, 2011.

On Sunday Oct. 23, 7 p.m., Zellerbach Hall, UC Berkeley Campus.

For tickets and information http://www.BayAreaFlamencoFestival.com or call (800) 838-3006. $30/$50/$75 (Tickets not available through Cal Performances).

Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor at Commonwealth Club

­In a rare public appearance, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor will discuss the need for a better-informed citizenry as well as her life, career, and views on the role of the U.S. Supreme Court. In conversation with former Chair of the Commonwealth Club Board of Governors, Dr. Mary Bitterman, Justice O’Connor will also share her thoughts on pertinent social issues ranging from the current election to abortion. They will discuss how these challenging issues may be resolved through civic education.

O’Connor, the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court, strongly believes that America suffers from a lack of civic education, and this is hurting Americans’ capacity to solve 21st century challenges. Justice O’Connor served on the Supreme Court for over two decades until her retirement in 2006.

 

No more abuse, exploitation say domestic workers

­by Marvin Ramí­rez

Domestic workers march agains abuse and explotation.: (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)Domestic workers march agains abuse and explotation.­ (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)

One of the most unprotected segment of the U.S. work force, vented their frustration Friday the 13th on this month, to tell employers: No more abuses, no more exploitation.

A colorful mass of people comprised­ mostly of women of different ethnic groups marched from 24th Street and Mission and headed to 26th to Valencia Street and returned to Mission St. to end the march at the Women’s Building on 18th Street.

The march was intended to highlight the legal victories where domestic workers have won hundred of thousands of dollars in backpay from employers who fail to pay minimum wage and overtime.

The National Domestic Workers Alliance joined hundreds of workers from Los Angeles, the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Washington DC, Miami, Seattle, Chicago, New York and Denver to share strategies, develop a national agenda, and march for ­domestic worker rights and dignity.

Domestic workers women march on Nov. 13 on Mission Street in route to the Women Building,: where they would be attending workshops to learn how to protect their labor rights. (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)Domestic workers women march on Nov. 13 on Mission Street in route to the Women Building, where they would be attending workshops to learn how to protect their labor rights. (PHOTO BY MARVIN RAMIREZ)

Immigra­nt women who work in other people’s homes are subject to many forms of exploitation and abuse. Some employers refuse to allow sick days or pay for overtime; often wages are less than the minimum wage.

For practical purposes, says a written declaration, these women have few enforceable legal protections. So some are getting together to support and protect each ­other.

A speaker from the AFL-CIO offered verbal support, but these workers are outside the reach of the labor movement — they are banding together to learn to demand their rights and negotiate for themselves.

They are looking into the creation of a California Domestic Worker Bill of Rights and build a national movement of domestic workers.

­­

Arab Americans continue to face both stigma and acceptance

by the University of Michigan

ANN ARBOR, Michigan.— Arab and Muslim Americans continue to face an unusual degree of both discrimination and acceptance, according to a University of Michigan researcher who headed an in-depth study of the nation’s most visible Arab and Chaldean communities.

“The post-9/11 backlash against Detroit area Arab and Muslim Americans was strong and immediate,” says U-M researcher Wayne Baker, co-author of “Citizenship and Crisis: Arab Detroit After 9/11,” just published by the Russell Sage Foundation. “Detroit was drawn into the ‘War on Terror’ almost by political reflex and in many respects the impact is continuing.”

Baker, a research scientist at the U-M Institute for Social Research (ISR) and a professor at the U-M Stephen M. Ross School of Business, is part of the Detroit Arab American Study Team that includes U-M researchers Sally Howell, Ann Chih Lin, Andrew Shryock, Ronald Stockton, and Mark Tessler and Princeton University research Amaney Jamal. All are co-authors of “Citizenship and Crisis.”

In the book, the team explores how the cultural prejudices that have often marginalized the Detroit Arab community came to a head after 9/11, and analyzes how the Arab communities of metropolitan Detroit have continued to thrive despite significant backlash from the crisis.

“Arabs and Muslims living in the U.S. repeatedly face situations in which their countries of origin, or Arabs and Muslims generally, are cast as enemies of the cimaUnited States and its allies in the Middle East,” says Baker. “As a result, Arab Americans must continually prove themselves, assuring their fellow nationals that they belong here, that they are loyal, that they are not a threat to national security.”

As such, the book’s authors believe Arab Americans highlight the contradictions in the multicultural ethos that dominates the concept and practice of citizenship in the U.S. Arab Americans have been singled out for harsh treatment including selective surveillance, deportation, and detention without due process, as well as presumptive freezing of financial assets, vandalism, and personal insults. But they have also been the beneficiaries of the politics of inclusion and acceptance.

Detroit has seen the establishment of the Arab American National Museum, the expansion of Arab American community organizations, and the election and appointment of Arab and Muslim citizens to political office, the authors point out. The area has also seen new partnerships between Arab American civil rights organizations, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the U.S Department of Homeland Security, as well as the creation of Arab American and Islamic studies programs in area universities, and the founding and expansion of at least a dozen new mosques.

The Detroit Arab and Muslim communities have also faced additional challenges – the intensification of violence in Iraq, further dispossession and bloodshed in Gaza and the West Bank, a devastating Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006, and the continued scrutiny, suspicion, and tactical harassment of Arab and Muslim Americans by the law enforcement arms of their own government.

But the authors conclude ­that there are also good reasons for optimism, and for hope that the tensions between inclusion and stigma ultimately serve to bind the community, spurring efforts to organization and activism that are essential to the Detroit area Arab community’s success.

Peruvian government accuses Chile of espionage

­

by the El Reportero’s news services

Alan GarcíaAlan García

Salvadoran authorities say at least 192 people were killed by floods and landslides that swept through the country last week.

El Salvador’s Civil Protection agency says in a statement that 89 of the victims were killed in the state of San Vicente, where days of heavy rains caused mud and boulders to sweep down the side of the Chichontepec volcano before dawn a week ago.

The agency said Sunday that dozens more remain missing. It says that more than 14,000 Salvadoran have been affected by the floods and mudslides that were indirectly linked to Hurricane Ida’s passage through the region.

Peruvian President Alan García cut short his trip to the Asia Pacific

Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Singapore, returning to Lima this morning to deal with a brewing spying case. Mr. Garcia abruptly announced his return—which comes a day earlier than had been scheduled—in order to publicly address an alleged incident of Chilean espionage involving an officer from the Peruvian Air Force. This newest diplomatic spat between the two countries had already provoked the cancellation of a meeting yesterday between President Garcia and his Chilean counterpart, Michelle Bachelet.

A Peruvian Air Force official Victor Ariza Mendoza, is accused of passing secret documents detailing Peru’s projected future military acquisitions to Chilean intelligence officers in exchange for money.

Obama’s new multilateralism founders on Honduras

When U.S. President Barack Obama addressed the Fifth Summit of the Americas in Trinidad on April 17 he pledged an era of equal partnership and a new chapter of engagement with the region that reflected his stated preference for multi-lateralism in regional affairs.

Seven months later, the administration’s patience with multilateralism appeared to have already worn thin, amid the failure of the efforts led by the main hemispheric Organization of American States (O.A.S.) to bring about a resolution to the Honduras coup crisis.

Obama has moved to re-assert the U.S. as the ultimate arbiter in Latin America, probably out of sheer frustration, but also at the cost of principle and in doing so has provoked a fresh rift with the region.

Zelaya backtracks as congress refuses to take orders

The ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya claims that the de facto president Roberto Micheletti breached and voided the Tegucigalpa-San José Agreement when he moved on Nov. 5 to install a ‘unity and national reconciliation’ government with himself as its head.

Few have taken note of the fact that Zelaya had by then already declared the agreement void, and had rejected an offer from Micheletti to overcome their differences.

This has thrown the international participants in the crisis into confusion.

Environmentalists alarmed by Puerto Rico policies

­SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico – Sweeping from lush mountain rain forests to pristine beaches, a corridor of land protected by Puerto Rico’s last governor hosts dozens of rare and endangered species and was championed by celebrities who helped fight off resort proposals.

Now new Gov. Luis Fortuno has revoked the reserve as part of a drive to bring jobs and investment for the U.S. territory’s struggling economy. And activists see a broader pattern of looser protection for the island’s environment.

Fortuno’s Oct. 30 order allows large-scale development inside the 3,200-acre 1,300-hectare) parcel of land immediately north of El Yunque, the only tropical rain forest in the U.S. National Forest system.

(Latin News, AP and AQ Online contributed to this report)