Tuesday, September 10, 2024
Home Blog Page 358

The virtual recovery of the economy – part 1

Marvin J. RamirezMarvin J. Ramirez

FROM THE EDITOR:Dear reader, I just found this interesting article written by Paul Craig Roberts, editor at Infowars.com, which details how the ill­s of the economy have come about. It will be a learning experience to many of you and me, of course. Due to its length, I will publish it in two parts.

The Virtual Recovery of the economy – part 1

by Paul Craig Roberts
Infowars.com

Since mid-2009 the US has been enjoying a virtual recovery courtesy of a rigged inflation measure that understates inflation. The financial Presstitutes spoon out the government’s propaganda that prices are rising less than 2 percent. But anyone who purchases food, fuel, medical care or anything else knows that low inflation is no more real that Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction or Gadhafi’s alleged attacks on Libyan protesters or Iran’s nuclear weapons. Everything is a lie to serve the power-brokers.

During the Clinton administration, Republican economists pushed through a change in the way the CPI is measured in order to save money by depriving Social Security retirees of their cost-of-living adjustment. Previously, the CPI measured the change in the cost of a constant standard of living. The new measure assumes that consumers adjust to price increases by lowering their standard of living by substituting lower quality, lower priced items. If the price, for example, of New York strip steak goes up, consumers are assumed to substitute the lower quality round steak. In other words, the new measure of inflation keeps inflation down by reflecting a lowered standard of living.

Statistician John Williams (shadowstats.com), who closely follows the collecting and reporting of official US economic statistics, reports that consumer inflation, as measured by the 1990 official government methodology has been running at about 5 percent. If the 1980 official methodology for measuring the CPI is used, John Williams reports that the current rate of US inflation is about 9 percent.

The 9 percent figure is more consistent with people’s experience in grocery stores.

Officially the recession that began in 2007 ended in June 2009 after 18 months, making the Bush Recession the longest recession since World War II. However, John Williams says that the recession has not ended. He says that only the GDP reporting, distorted by an erroneous measurement of inflation, shows a recovery. Other, more reliable measures of economic activity, show no recovery.

Williams reports that the economy began turning down in 2006, falling lower in 2008 and 2009, and bottom-bouncing ever since. Not only is there no sign of any recovery, but “the economic downturn now is intensifying once again.” The absence of an economic recovery “is evident in the [official] reporting of nearly all major economic series. Not one of these series shows a pattern of activity that confirms the recovery [shown] in the GDP series.”

Williams concludes that “the official recovery simply is a statistical illusion created by the government’s use of understated inflation in deflating the GDP.” In other words, the reported gains in GDP are accounted for by price increases, not increases in real output.

The result of the US government’s economic deception is the same as the deception Washington has used to start wars all over the Middle East. The government propaganda produces a make-believe virtual reality that bears no relationship to real reality. In history there have been many governments who have prevailed by deceiving the people, but Washington has moved this success to a new peak. As long as Americans believe anything Washington says, they are doomed.

It is easy to see why there is no economic recovery and cannot be an economic recovery. Look at the chart below (courtesy of John Williams, shadowstats.com).

Real median household income at the end of 2011 is back where it was in 1967-68. Moreover, Williams has deflated household income to get its real value by using the official inflation measure, which substantially understates inflation. If Williams had used the 1990 or 1980 official government methodology for calculating the consumer price index, the real median incomes of households would show a larger decline.

Moreover, the low 2011 real median household income is the summation, in most cases, of two household earners, whereas in 1967-68 one earner could produce the same real income. As Nobel economist Gary Becker, my former colleague as Business Week columnist, pointed out, when both husband and wife have to work in order to maintain the same purchasing power, household income from the wife’s in-kind household services is eliminated. Therefore, the monetary measure of the dual household income overstates income, because it is not adjusted for the lost benefits formerly provided by the wife who at home managed the household.

Americans are far more oppressed by the power brokers in Washington than statistics display. Moreover, the young are born into the oppressive, exploitative American system and do not know any different. They are fed by the Presstitute media with endless propaganda about how fortunate they are and how indispensable their wonderful country is. Americans are kept in a constant state of amusement, and many never grasp the loss of their civil liberties, job and career opportunities, and respect that the US won during the decades-long cold war with Soviet Communism.

On September 13, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben “Helicopter” Bernanke announced Quantitative Easing 3. Bernanke said that the recovery is weak and needs more Fed stimulus. He said the Fed will purchase $40 billion of mortgage bonds per month in order to drive interest rates further below the rate of inflation and help to sell more houses.

But how do you sell houses to households who are getting by with 1967-68 levels of real income and who have absolutely no job security? Their company can be taken over and offshored tomorrow or they can be replaced by foreign workers on H-1B visas. Housing

prices have dropped, but not to 1967-68 levels.

Bernanke’s announcement that the Fed’s purchase of mortgage bonds is to spur housing and the economy is disinformation. Bernanke is purchasing the bonds in order to boost the values of the derivatives and debt instruments in the banks’ portfolios. Lower interest rates raise the value of the debt instruments on ­the banks’ balance sheets. By depriving American savers of a real interest rate on their savings, Bernanke makes the busted banks look solvent.

This is what is happening in “freedom and democracy” America. The vast majority of Americans, especially the retired, are forced to consume their savings and draw down their capital because they can get no real interest on their savings.

The beneficiaries are the banksters, who can borrow at near zero interest rates, charge consumers 16 percent on their credit cards, and use the Federal Reserve’s largess to speculate on interest rate swaps and credit default swaps. The American taxpayers hold the bag for the banksters’ uncovered gambles. Would you not gamble if the American taxpayers had to cover your bets, but your winnings were yours alone?

Ignored, negleted, forgotten = coups, caudillos, cocaine

por José de la Isla
Hispanic Link News Service

MEXICO CITY—The only mention given Latin America in the third and concluding presidential debate October 22 was from Mitt Romney and it came from his stump speech.

In the debate, he said there are “opportunities for us in Latin America we have just not taken advantage of fully.” He recognized “its economy is almost as big as that of China.

“We’re all focused on China,” he added. “Latin America is a huge opportunity for us (with similarities, like): time zone, language opportunities.”

He had mentioned increasing trade with Latin America as part of his five-part plan during the second debate. The plan includes U.S. energy independence in five years; a “crack down” on China when that country cheats; balancing the national budget; fixing worker training programs and schools; and championing small business.

Romney advisor Otto Reich, former U.S. ambassador to Venezuela under President George W. Bush, told Voxxi reporter Griselda Nevárez in the spin room after the second debate, the “(Obama) administration has been ignoring Latin America, neglected Latin America and forgotten Latin America. Eight of the 25 words uttered were “Latin America,” so at least the repetition — like a Sesame Street lesson — gets to the learner.

How to make improvements is another matter.

Reich complained about Venezuela President Hugo Chávez’s election, the opening up of travel abroad by Cubans, and how more cooperation with Mexico was needed to curb drug cartels by working with incoming president Peña Nieto.

He claimed the gunrunning which occurred under the disastrous “Fast and Furious” in the Obama administration would never happen under Mitt Romney, whose decisiveness he equated with Ronald Reagan’s and George W. Bush’s, because Romney would supervise federal employees better. (Honest, that’s how he explains U.S. complicity in 70,000 deaths in six years, 10,000 disappearances, and 130,000 displaced persons in Mexico over arms and drugs.)

Licit trade is a lesser problem. Mexico, for example, is moving toward becoming again the United States’ second largest trade partner, ahead of China. Brazil (8th) and Venezuela (14th) are large and growing trade partners. The trend doesn’t require a presidential candidate pronouncement to make it come about.

Mexico and Brazil both receive important European and U.S. investments for the expanding North American and world trade. Meanwhile, Mexico is gaining on Brazil’s status as the fastest growing economy in Latin America.

In this vein, an important alternative idea to ponder is whether the United States and Latin American might be better off reducing some trade, not increasing it.

Slowing down some U.S. trade, like in the demand for pot, cocaine and non-pharmaceutical drugs, could probably contribute more toward real improvements.

One way is by making drug use a health issue taking measure to reverse the trend that makes the United States the world’s largest consumer of illicit drugs. Reforms like that also help reduce our own criminality, such as human trafficking, gunrunning, money-laundering and other related trades.

Back in August, Romney said if elected he would launch in his first hundred days, the “Campaign for Economic Opportunity in Latin America.” He identified “the authoritarian socialist model offered by Cuba and Venezuela” as the menace, the enemy to overcome, not drugs. Free enterprise, he claimed, would take them head-on.

His plan would expand initiatives for the United States and would encourage Latin American companies to invest and create jobs in the U.S. marketplace.

That in fact is the problem.

There is already too much free enterprise and too many “companies”  work(

also known as cartels) in the illicit drug business. If the U.S. doesn’t do serious drug-user reform through treatment, rehab, maintenance and applying regulations and a medical model, free enterprise will continue to respond to demand and create more and more high-paying lucrative jobs in the criminal arts.

It’s hard to believe a presidential candidate, like Romney, doesn’t understand the Law of Unintended Consequences. It means doing one thing and getting the opposite result.

Or maybe he does know. It’s also called contradicting one’s self.

(José de la Isla, a nationally syndicated columnist for Hispanic Link and Scripps Howard news services, has been recognized for two consecutive years for his commentaries by New America Media. His next book, The Rise of Latino Political Power, will appear early in 2013. Reach him at joseisla3@yahoo.com.)

Find this column in Spanish and­ more news and commentary at www.HispanicLink.org.

As society unrvels in wake of Sandy, politicians endorse more power for FEMA

by Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com­­

Politicians ceding more power to FEMAPoliticians ceding more power to FEMA

News wires across the spectrum are filled with harrowing signs of unfolding social collapse in the wake of Sandy that could exacerbate in the days to come as power outages are expected to last a week, pitting residents against each other over access to gasoline, food and other necessary supplies in large pockets of t­he most densely populated area of the nation.

That desperation is sure to further intensify in proportion with strained resources, as order has already started to dissolve under reported limits on cash and commerce as electronic payment is suspended and those on food stamps are unable to use EBT payments.

Images of hungry people diving for food in dumpsters make clear that neither individuals nor governments were prepared to keep things running and meet basic needs despite the hype over the “superstorm” leading up to Sandy.

Shocking accounts of eroding civility have cropped up across social media and in reports. As Breitbart demonstrated, numerous threats were made at gun or knife point, while long lines for gasoline saw fights and high tension. Gas stations continue to be guarded by armed police, as supplies are rationed.

Lootings and break-ins are predictably taking place as well, including reports that many thieves are dressing up as Con Edison or FEMA employees to gain access to homes.

Food and water will continue to be an issue for days to come, with many residents already begging for help, with distribution of supplies hampered by a lack of power, and many groceries contaminated by the floods.

Meanwhile, it’s politics as usual on the campaign trail – not in trading blows between the Obama and Romney camps just days ahead of the scheduled election – but in praising FEMA and endorsing more power and billions more in money for the bloated agency.

GOP Governor Chris Christie, presiding over the heavily affected state of New Jersey, has been most notable in embracing federal disaster relief in force – and with full federal funding – even praising President Obama despite the tense election season reaching crescendo, irking many GOP politicos.

Mitt Romney had to quickly backtrack from a populist-toned campaign pitch to put power back in the hands of state and local entities during disaster, instead backing the big government FEMA solution that has proven ridiculously incompetent during past disasters despite extensive and costly planning for emergency plans and a blank check to Homeland Security’s mission.

Mainstream media have echoed this uncritical endorsement, giving FEMA preemptive praise for its efforts in Sandy. ‘FEMA is the solution,’ and other bold claims are made to ensure the public does not break out of the illusion that FEMA is its loving savior.

But FEMA remains an agency capable only of a mismatched response, too slow to handle the most immediate needs to contain potential chaos, but always on pace for a gradual power grab after the fact, actually feeding off a greater disaster.

Once again, this bloated government agency can’t and won’t help the masses in a disaster. Yet politicians throughout the corporate-owned two party system are lining up to meet any request for FEMA funds, already approaching $12 billion plus, despite its track record of failure.

While nearly 5 million people are without power for perhaps another week, the Huffington Post, among others, has identified 17 million living in FEMA’s disaster relief zone, soon to be occupied by an inefficient, top down control mechanism.

­This infographic details the extent of areas and populations under FEMA’s thumb:

Notoriously, FEMA botched any meaningful relief efforts after Hurricane Katrina in terms of its primary mandate to quickly rescue and care for the needs of displaced victims, yet went over the top in creating an occupied martial law zone where guns were confiscated even in dry areas, the needy and vulnerable were placed in a hotbed of criminals at the Superdome and people were shot for trying to cross the bridge and exit the disaster zone.

Congressman Ron Paul weighed in as a lonely voice willing to critique FEMA’s history of inefficiency and naked power grabs, while defending the centuries of local aid organized within the community in simply helping each other:

There is a good case for stating that FEMA’s true intent is not to prevent natural disasters from devolving into social chaos, but rather to simply step in and soak up massive funds and dominate local and private relief agencies.

 

­

Study: Aspartame is linked to leukemia and lymphoma

by Ethan Evers
Natural News

As few as one diet soda daily may increase the risk for leukemia in men and women, and for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma in men, according to new results from the longest-ever running study on aspartame as a carcinogen in humans. Importantly, this is the most comprehensive, long-term study ever completed on this topic, so it holds more weight than other past studies which appeared to show no risk. And disturbingly, it may also open the door for further similar findings on other cancers in future studies.

The most thorough study yet on aspartame – Over two million person-years

For this study, researchers prospectively analyzed data from the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study for a 22-year period. A total of 77,218 women and 47,810 men were included in the analysis, for a total of 2,278,396 person-years of data. Apart from sheer size, what makes this study superior to other past studies is the thoroughness with which aspartame intake was assessed. Every two years, participants were given a detailed dietary questionnaire, and their diets were reassessed every four years.

Previous studies which found no link to cancer only ever assessed participants’ aspartame intake at one point in time, which could be a major weakness affecting their accuracy.

One diet soda a day increases leukemia, multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphomas

The combined results of this new study showed that just one 12-fl oz. can (355 ml) of diet soda daily leads to:

– 42 percent higher leukemia risk in men and women (pooled analysis)

– 102 percent higher multiple myeloma risk (in men only)

– 31 percent higher non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk (in men only)

These results were based on multi-variable relative risk models, all in comparison to participants who drank no diet soda. It is unknown why only men drinking higher amounts of diet soda showed increased risk for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Note that diet soda is the largest dietary source of aspartame (by far) in the U.S. Every year, Americans consume about 5,250 tons of aspartame in total, of which about 86 percent (4,500 tons) is found in diet sodas.

Confirmation of previous high quality research on animals

This new study shows the importance of the quality of research. Most of the past studies showing no link between aspartame and cancer have been criticized for being too short in duration and too inaccurate in assessing long-term aspartame intake. This new study solves both of those issues. The fact that it also shows a positive link to cancer should come as no surprise, because a previous best-in-class research study done on animals (900 rats over their entire natural lifetimes) showed strikingly similar results back in 2006: aspartame significantly increased the risk for lymphomas and leukemia in both males and females. More worrying is the follow on mega-study, which started aspartame exposure of the rats at the fetal stage. Increased lymphoma and leukemia risks were confirmed, and this time the female rats also showed significantly increased breast (mammary) cancer rates. This raises a critical question: will future, high-quality studies uncover links to the other cancers in which aspartame has been implicated (brain, breast, prostate, etc.)?

There is now more reason than ever to completely avoid aspartame in our daily diet. For those who are tempted to go back to sugary sodas as a “healthy” alternative, this study had a surprise finding: men consuming one or more sugar-sweetened sodas daily saw a 66 percent increase in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (even worse than for diet soda). Perhaps the healthiest soda is no soda at all. Sources for this article include:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23097267,­http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16507461, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17805418.

Nicaragua wants Russia firms in transoceanic canal

­

by the El Reportero’s wire services

Daniel OrtegaDaniel Ortega

Moscow, Oct 30 (Prensa Latina) President of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega, reaffirmed today the conviction that Russian firms will take part actively in the construction of an interoceanic canal linking the Pacific and the Atlantic oceans through his country.

“We are certain that firms from Russia will be involved in the great work of the canal through Nicaragua,” he said in a TV broadcast interview released here.­

Ortega told Russia Today TV channel that firms from the People’s Republic of china and other nations, grouped in a firm created in Hong Kong that is already operating, are involved in the project.

He said that with the return to power of the Sandinista National Liberation Front, Nicaragua established from 2007 a longstanding relation with the Russian Federation, which has undoubtedly mean a great relief for Nicaragua because this is a cooperation that values the Nicaraguan people in all fields.

Top Colombian narco falls in Argentina

News from LatinNews Daily Report — ‘Mi Sangre’ (Henry de Jesús López Londoño) was captured on Oct. 30 by members of the Argentine intelligence service, Secretaría de Inteligencia (SI, formerly Side), while he was dining with his wife and several guards at an upscale restaurant in Pilar, a wealthy Buenos Aires suburb.

­Colombian government and Farc stay true to their style in Oslo

“In Colombia, what people want most is peace, and so we have to ask the Farc [Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia] to respect the civilian population,” Vice-President Angelino Garzón said during a press conference this week. Peace has a chance and now it also has a place and date when Colombia could get a step closer to achieving it: on 15 November in Havana, the government of President Juan Manuel Santos and the leadership of the Farc will begin the formal dialogue process that was officially launched last week in Oslo.

Multinationals interested in searching for oil in Honduras

TEGUCIGALPA (Prensa Latina) The German multinational Statoil, Spanish Repsol and British BG Group are interested in searching for petroleum in Honduras, as confirmed by Roberto Herrera, presidential advisor and expert in international rights.

According to what has been published by local digital media laprensa.hn, elheraldo.hn and latribuna.hn, the three multinational companies have bought information obtained by the Norwegian firm Petroleum Geophysics that has made oil explorations in Honduran waters.

The names of the companies were revealed soon after the government announced to have started dialogues to decide if they could start in the extraction of petroleum in their Caribbean territorial waters.

The vice-president and minister of the Presidency, María Antonieta Guillén de Bográn, explained that the concession for the search of petroleum in the Caribbean will be made inside the current legal frame and with benefits for the country.

U.S. Supreme Court to argue use of k9 search by police outside your home

by Donna Anderson
Infowars.com

They’re already allowed to search your car, your crotch and your luggage. Now, man’s best friend is about to be allowed to sniff around outside your home, too. And if they smell something they don’t like, you’re going to jail. Your Constitutional right to secure your home against unreasonable search and seizure is about to be erased.

Gregory Garre, an attorney representing the state of Florida, argues that it’s perfectly legal to use drug-detection dogs to sniff around your outside house and if the dog alerts they can use that to justify entering your home to conduct a search. He compares it to Trick-or-Treaters on Halloween night:

“The police ‘did the same thing that millions of Americans will do on Halloween night, which is walk up to the front steps, knock on the door, and while they were there, they took in the air and the dog alerted to the smell of illegal narcotics.’”

The difference is, Americans don’t have to open their doors to Trick-or-Treaters if they don’t want to, but we all know what happens if you deny entry to a cop.

At issue is a 2006 case involving Joelis Jardines. After receiving an anonymous crime-stoppers tip that Jardines was conducting illegal drug activity in his home, police officers showed up on his doorstep with Franky, their drug-sniffing dog. When Franky alerted for drugs – outside the home, on the front porch – police officers got a warrant, searched Jardines’ home, found marijuana, and arrested him.

Jardines’ lawyer, Public Defender Howard Blumberg, argued that the dog sniff constituted illegal search and seizure and the Florida Supreme Court agreed.

“The entire history of the Fourth Amendment really is based on the fact that the home is different,” says Jardines’ lawyer, Howard Blumberg. “It goes all the way back to the early 1600s and the saying that a man’s home is his castle.”

The case now stands before the US Supreme Court where justices will be asked to decide if allowing a dog to perform a drug-sniff at the front door is a Fourth Amendment search requiring probable cause. Blumberg warns that if the use of drug-sniffing dogs outside the home is not deemed to be a search the “real-life consequences could be profound.”

“Police would be free ‘to walk up and down suburban neighborhoods, go up to each door, and see if the dog alerts to contraband.’ And they could do the same thing in apartment houses, checking out each apartment door ‘based on nothing, or on an anonymous tip, or because that’s what they want to do that day.’”

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution says: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

In 2001 Justice Antonin Scalia ruled that police could not use heat-detection devices outside a home to detect marijuana grow lights, calling it an invasion of privacy because the technology could also detect innocent details of the homeowner’s life, such as “the hour at which the lady of the house takes her bath.”

Of course, the state argues that the police have much better things to do with their time than walk their drug-sniffing dogs around homes and apartment buildings if they don’t have probable cause. They also argue that their dogs only alert to drugs, so what’s the problem?

The problem is, when it comes to drug sniffing dogs you’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. If you don’t allow the search you’re automatically assumed guilty. If you do, those dogs are going to find something and you’re either going to jail or the cops are going to confiscate whatever they find.

Under current laws, law enforcement agencies are allowed to seize assets they suspect are tied to illegal activity. Once the property has been seized it’s up to the owner to prove he obtained those assets legally. In about 80 percent of forfeiture cases the property owner is never charged with a crime, and he never gets the property back.

Consider the 2010 case of Jerome Chennault who lost $22,870 in a traffic stop. While traveling between South Carolina and his home in Henderson, Nev., Chennault was pulled over in Edwardsvill, Ill. for following another car too closely. The officer thought he had an “inappropriate laugh” and asked Chennault if he could search his car. Of course, Chennault said yes, what else could he say?

The officer found $22,870 in a side pocket of Chennault’s travel bag. A narcotics dog was called to the scene and the dog gave a positive alert when it sniffed the cash.

When Chennault was questioned further, he told officials that he had withdrawn $28,000 from an account in Las Vegas “and had left home with it three or four months prior intending to buy a house in South Carolina while staying with a nephew,” according to the complaint.

Chennault then had to spend more than $2,000 in court and attorney fees to get his money back. Madison County Public Defender John Rekowski said, “To forfeit when there is a crime is one thing. To say that you have to come in and post, in this case, more than $2,000 with the court to get back the $22,000 that they took from you because they felt like taking it, is ridiculous.”

In a 2005 case, Illinois v. Caballes, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that having a K9 cop sniff the outside of a vehicle during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment. However, Justice David Souter dissented, pointing out the mounting evidence that drug-sniffing dogs aren’t always reliable, noting that an Illinois study found the dogs failed 12.5 to 60 percent of the time.

Dogs are bred and trained to please their human owners and they can easily be manipulated to alert whenever their handler wants them to. Even the most conscientious handler can inadvertently use body language that he’s suspicious of something and the dog will alert simply because that’s the way he’s been trained.

In 2011, the Chicago Tribune published a review of drug searches which found that, over a 3-year period, only 44 percent of dog alerts led to the discovery of actual illegal drugs. The report also stated that for Hispanic drivers the success rate was only 27 percent, making it even more obvious that drug-sniffing dogs are responding to the biases of their handlers.

The Huffington Post showed video of a traffic stop to K-9 expert, ­Gene Papet, the Executive Director of K9 Resources.

“Just before the dog alerts, you can hear a change in the tone of the handler’s voice. That’s troubling. I don’t know anything about this particular handler, but that’s often an indication of a handler that’s cuing a response.” In other words, it’s indicative of a handler instructing the dog to alert, not waiting to see whether the dog will alert.”

“You also hear the handler say at one point that the dog alerted from the front of the car because the wind is blowing from the back of the car to the front, so the scent would have carried with the wind,” Papet says. “But the dog was brought around the car twice. If that’s the case, the dog should have alerted the first time he was brought to the front of the car. The dog only alerted the second time, which corresponded to what would be consistent with a vocal cue from the handler.

The Florida case is expected to be presented to the U.S. Supreme Court in December.

Las Bomberas de la Bahía en fiesta de beneficiencia

­

por el equipo deEl Reportero

Las bomberas de la BahíaLas bomberas de la Bahía

Únase a Galería y Las Bomberas de la Bahía (Las Bomberas) para una noche de música y baile.

Las Bomberas, fundada en noviembre de 2007 bajo la dirección de Denise Solis y Sarazeta Ragazzi, realizó su primera presentación en Galería, haciendo de esta especial presentación nocturna del Día de los Muertos una tradición y celebración de cinco años de excelencia musical.

Las Bomberas es uno de un puñado de conjuntos de Bomba sólo de mujeres que existe a nivel internacional. El conjunto está formado por artistas, educadoras, y activistas del Área de la Bahía. Su trabajo, dedicado a expandir la tradición de Bomba al destacar las formas culturales vivas y su legado de Resistencia que surgió en las plantaciones de caña de azúcar de Puerto Rico por esclavos, también destaca simultáneamente el importante papel que juegan las mujeres para apoyar nuestras comunidades.

Las Bomberas han tocado internacionalmente para instituciones educativas, centros culturales, festivales culturales y en dos trabajos originales comisionados; ¡no se pierda este exclusivo compromiso! De las 7 p.m.-10 p.m. el 2 de noviembre, 2857- Calle 24, San Francisco. Entrada: entre $10 y $15.

La Serpiente y las Cuatro Estaciones (teatro)

Este evento multimedia realizado por estudiantes para el Día de los Muertos incluye danza, teatro y música original en vivo, con un guión que celebra la continuidad de la vida-muerte-vida, como lo demuestra un asombroso telón de fondo que muestra una serpiente que se muerde la cola. Las cuatro estaciones se refieren a los diferentes momentos en la vida humana, desde el nacimiento hasta la muerte.

Producido por el Teatro Rainbow del Departamento de Teatro y Artes de la Universidad San Francisco State. Escrita y dirigida por el profesor Carlos Barón, “La Serpiente y las Cuatro Estaciones” cuenta con la coreografía de Adriana Sánchez, la música compuesta e interpretada por el maestro Miguel Martínez y la presencia de la actriz / cantante Saday Osorio Córdova.

Los otros artistas son estudiantes del Taller de Teatro Latino en SF State, con los servicios técnicos y otras necesidades de producción suministrados por los estudiantes del Departamento de Artes Teatrales de Comunicación Audiovisual y Comunicación Electrónica de SF State.

El viernes 2 de noviembre, 8 pm, en el noreste de la plaza de la calle 24. Estación Misión del BART, esquina de las calles 24 y Misión, en San Francisco. Entrada: Gratuita.

El Instituto de Estudios Integrales de California se complace en presentar: Filosofía Caribeña: Música como Identidad y Resistencia

Serie de charlas con John Santos sobre música afro-latina. Emana del Caribe como una poderosa manifestación de la autodeterminación y educación dentro de las comunidades de la clase trabajadora. La serie está basada en la música de las Antillas españolas, música que documenta y personifica la saga americana tan bien como cualquiera.

Todas las charlas se realizan en:Edificio Principal de CIIS, 1453 Calle Misión, entre la 9 y la 10 en San Francisco, CA 94103

Lunes, Nov. 5, 7:00 P.M.-9:00 p.m.: La Música de John Santos

Lunes, Nov. 12, 7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.: Música Tradicional Cubana

Sábado, Nov. 17, 10:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.: Salsa, Jazz, Expresión Contemporánea

Lunes, Nov. 19, 7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.: Música Tradicional Puertorriqueña.

Para inscribirse: 415.575.6100, o vaya online a:

­http://www.ciis.edu/News_and_Events/Event_Calendar/Santos_FA12_(wk).html.

Poncho Sánchez y su banda de jazz latino

Si la música se tratara de imágenes, la música del percusionista Poncho Sanchez sería descrita como un giro caleidoscópico de algunos de los colores más cálidos y luces brillantes que emergen de ambos lados de la frontera. En cualquier evento dado, en cualquier registro dado, fragmentos de jazz latino, swing, bebop, salsa y otros ritmos pegajosos se juntan y se mezclan en un ardiente giro, con resultados sorprendentes.

Juves– 8 p.m. Sábado, 8 – 10 de noviembre @ Yoshis SF. www.ponchosanchez.com.

Harvest of Empire, like its protagonists, follows a winding road

by Luis Carlos López
Hispanic Link News Service

Un inmigrante marcha como visto en el documental de Peter Getzels y Eduardo López Cosecha de Imperio.: (ARLINGTON WEST, PETER DUDAR AND SALLY MARR)An immigrant march as seen in the Peter Getzels and Eduardo López documentary Harvest of Empire. (ARLINGTON WEST, PETER DUDAR AND SALLY MARR)

Neither Rome nor Hollywood was built in a day.

With this rationale and a prayer, Eduardo López continues to promote his documentary Harvest of Empire.

Completed this year after nearly a decade in the making, it was denied entrance to such major film festivals as Sundance and Tribeca. “We’ve overcome a great deal to get to this point and now we have some good news,” López says. “In spite of so many obstacles, this film is being embraced by critics and the public.”

The documentary takes a decades-long trip through a roiled Latin America compacted into 90 rollercoaster minutes. It is based loosely on New York Daily News columnist Juan González’s book of the same name. López co-directed it with Peter Getzels. Through historical footage and bridging narratives by González, Nobel Prize winner Rigoberta Menchu, acclaimed Dominican-American writer Junot Díaz and others, it helps explain how in the approaching mid-21st century, half of the U.S. population will trace its origin not to Europe but to Latin America.

Without fanfare, Harvest of Empire had captured enough attention to yield extended showings in both the Laemmle Playhouse in Los Angeles and the Quad Theater in New York as it makes the case that the mass migration is a direct result of U.S. foreign policy.

U.S. -backed despots and dictators and their heavy-handed rule have led to what Hispanic Link columnist José de la Isla refers to “migrations and unavoidable personal epics…This is not about chauvinism, fake patriotism or ideology, but about understanding the underlying plot,” he says. Harvest of Empire bares the circumstances that drove millions out of Central America, the Dominican Republic, Mexico and our own commonwealth of Puerto Rico. “The documentary is history, sociology and foreign policy combined. It is reality.”

Filmland chronicle Hollywood Reporter mentions the Iran-Contra scandal and credits Harvest for dissecting the roles “played by U.S. military and economic interests” in half a dozen countries.

The Los Angeles Times labels the production as “built for clarity rather than cinematic excitement” and “a valuable resource, a good starting point for a fuller perspective on this nation of immigrants.”

The New York Daily News offers, “In an era of anti-immigrant fervor, this sobering and much-needed look at Latino migration is built on an undeniably optimistic premise that once Americans have accurate facts, they rarely allow injustices to stand.”

Add to all those words the New York Times review. It praises the documentary as having a “journalistic pedigree and a punch that comes from political advocacy.”

Now López says he has the ammunition to make his second round of courting studios for wide distribution.

Co-producer Wendy Thompson-Márquez claims, “Now we have a fighting chance to take the film to other cities,” as López adds the spin, “In today’s market, selfdistribution is not secondbest. It’s a different alternative. For us, the most important response has been from the public.”

Counting the millions of families Uncle Sam uprooted and drove here, he concludes in gross understatement, “Latino audiences in particular have a very emotional reaction.”

(At age 8, Hispanic Link News Service columnist Luis Carlos López immigrated to the United States from Nicaragua after his parents sought political asylum here. Now based in Phoenix, he viewed an advance screening of the documentary at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. Reach him at ­lclopez4@gmail.com.)

Boxing

­Oct. 27 At Tokyo

Takahiro Ao vs. Gamaliel Diaz, 12, for Ao’s WBC super featherweight title.

At Moscow

Denis Lebedev, vs. Guillermo Jones vs. 12, for Lebedev’s WBA World cruiserweight title.

Nov. 3 At Sendai, Japan,

Shinsuke Yamanaka vs. Tomas Rojas, 12, for Yamanaka’s WBC bantamweight title;

Toshiyuki Igarashi vs. Nestor Narvaes, 12, for Igarashi’s WBC flyweight title.

At Montreal

Lucian Bute vs. Denis Grachev, 12, for Bute’s NABF light heavyweight title;

Pier-Olivier Cote vs. Ali Chebah, 12, for Cote’s IBF Inter-Continental junior welterweight title.

Nov. 10 At O2 World Arena, Hamburg, Germany,

Wladimir Klitschko vs. Mariusz Wach, 12, for Klitschko’s WBA-WBOIBF heavyweight titles.

National Guard whistleblower: doomsday preppers will be treated as terrorists

­by Melissa Melton

Infowars.com

El Huracán Isaac trae a miles de tropas de la Guardia Nacianal a la región afectada en agosto de 2012.Hurricane Isaac Brings Thousands of National Guard troops to the affected region in August 2012.

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic…”

So begins the Oath of Enlistment for the U.S. military, but in an explosive interview with a National Guard whistle blower shown below, soldiers are now being advised they will be ordered to break that oath should civil unrest erupt across the country.

Referred to only as “Soldier X” under promise of anonymity, an Army National Guardsman spoke via phone with Infowars Nightly News Producer Rob Dew regarding a recent briefing his unit underwent on actions the military would take in the event that an Obama election loss sparked rioting in America’s streets.

Citing not only recent widespread threats to riot if Mitt Romney were to become the next U.S. president, but threats to actually assassinate him should he win, Soldier X’s superiors dispensed plans of how the National Guard would be responsible for “taking over” and quelling such unrest.

The soldiers were reportedly told “Doomsday preppers will be treated as terrorists.”

In addition, guns will be confiscated.

“They have a list compiled of all these doomsday preppers that have gone public and they plan to go after them first,” Soldier X said. He claimed those in charge are acting under the belief that preppers will be “the worst part” of any potential civil unrest.

Soldier X was also told that any soldiers in the ranks who are known as preppers will be deemed “defects.” He explained the label meant these soldiers would be treated as traitors. “If you don’t conform, they will get rid of you,” he added.

Unit members also warned not to associate with any fellow soldiers who are preppers.

Not only does the military reportedly plan to target preppers should mass chaos break out, but Soldier X also voiced his concerns regarding civilian gun confiscation.

Soldier X admitted, “Our worry is that Obama’s gonna do what he said he’s gonna do and he’s gonna outlaw all weapons altogether and anybody’s name who is on a weapon, they’re gonna come to your house and try to take them.”

It would not be the first time the National Guard has been used to unconstitutionally disarm law-abiding citizens, robbing them of their Second Amendment right to bear arms. In the aftermath of hurricane Katrina, police and military took to the streets disarming lawful gun owners, including those who were on dry land and had plenty of stored food and water.

Fast forward to this past summer when a leaked Army manual dated 2006 entitled, “Civil Disturbance Operations” surfaced outlining plans not only to confiscate firearms domestically during mass unrest, but to actually detain and even kill American citizens who refuse to hand over their guns. This manual works in conjunction with “FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations,” another Army manual leaked this year, which instructs troops on how to properly detain and intern Americans into re-education camps, including ways that so-called “psy-op officers” will “indoctrinate” incarcerated “political activists” into developing an “understanding and appreciation of U.S. policies and actions.”

Add these manuals to the plethora of Executive Orders Obama has signed during his term which have dismantled our Constitution piece by piece, including the martial law implementing National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order which gives the president the power to confiscate citizens’ private property in the event of any national emergency, including economic.

Add it all to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in which Obama granted powers to disappear and indefinitely detain American citizens without any due process, and it is easy to see the tyrannical big picture our government has painted.

When asked if he would go along with gun confiscation, Soldier X replied he and his fellow like-minded guardsmen planned to stand down — not answer the phone or show up to post.

“I’m sorry but I don’t believe in suicide,” he said.

Preppers are becoming regular government targets these days, most recently when a Missisippi prepper group member with a clean record was suddenly taken off his flight halfway to Japan and informed he was on the nofly list, an FBI terrorist watchlist, stranding him in Hawaii. Other preppers have been denied their Second Amendment rights without legitimate cause.

It is beyond glaringly obvious at this point the U.S. government is gearing up for mass civil unrest. Not only has the DHS sparked controversy by purchasing billions of rounds of ammo, but the department even went so far as to begin classifying further purchases, blacking out bullet figures it is using taxpayer money to buy.

In addition, while FEMA can procure a billion dollars in bulk food supplies, the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism project released a flier instructing military surplus storeowners to report any customers who “make bulk purchases of items” including “meals ready to eat”.

­Should society as we know it collapse following the election, it would seem the ultimate prepper and the ultimate terrorist is, indeed, the U.S. government.