Wednesday, September 11, 2024
Home Blog Page 260

First group of Cuban migrants in Mexico heading for the U.S.

by the El Reportero’s wire services

The group of 180 Cuban migrants that received special permission of entry from the Mexican government, continues today, now on their own, their trip in direction to the border of the United States.
“They are on their own”, said a source of the National Institute of Migration (INAMI), an institution that received these migrants Tuesday on the state of Chiapas in a tidy and rapid form, gave them a document of low visitor delivered by humanitarian reasons and for agreement with several Central American countries.
This document allows stay for 20 days to the first group of Cuban of a pilot plan that went out with the help of airlines of Costa Rica, covered on highway El Salvador and Guatemala and must go along along Mexican territory to reach the border of the United States.
Grisel Suárez Clavo, interviewed by telephone from Tapachula, Chiapas, said that it would extract accounts to buy an air ticket that takes him a bordering city with the United States, where the Cuban who arrive on bus or car, receive from the authorities of the northern country privileges denied to other migrants of the region and from other latitudes.
Although till now the operative initiated in Liberia, Costa Rica, seems successful, the pilot plan will be checked by the concerned governments: Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico, although about insurance, something will have to be said by the United States, which unlike migration policy towards Cuba, Central America and other Latin American countries is a criticism object.
These are the same US authorities, that these days they realize raids and massive deportations against Latin-American migrants, who keep on trying to escape of economic lacks, political violence or for reasons of familiar reunification.

Latino construction worker reluctantly buys powerball ticket…and wins
A construction worker in New Mexico might be the world’s most reluctant new millionaire.
Jose Sarabia went to buy a single lottery ticket at a gas station in Loving, New Mexico, but the clerk accidently printed two out.
The clerk tried to sell the extra ticket to one of Sarabia’s friends, but he didn’t want it so the construction worker shelled out another $3. Turns out that was probably the best few dollars he ever spent.
Sarabia’s ticket matched the white ball numbers of 02, 11, 47, 62 and 63. He missed landing that night’s jackpot of $500 million by not matching the winning red Powerball of 17.
While there were 15 other lottery players across the nation who won $1 million, Sarabia purchased an additional $1 Power Play –making him the only winner in the United States to double his Powerball prize to $2 million.
Sarabia, who is from Fort Stockton, Texas and has commuted to New Mexico for work for the last three years, said that he plans to use his winnings to pay off his house and cars, donate to his church and help his parents.
When asked if his friend regretted not buying the winning ticket, Sarabia said with a smile, “No. It was my ticket, it was meant for me.”
The lottery win is also good news for the store that sold the ticket, Brewer Oil Loving Chevron, which is eligible for a $2,500 New Mexico Lottery bonus.
And in case anyone was wondering, Sarabia already has his ticket for Wednesday’s Powerball jackpot, which was increased this morning to $1.5 billion.

Tribute to the Prince of Castilian Letters

Compiled by the El Reportero’s staff

A tribute to the Prince of Castilian letters, Félix Rubén García Sarmiento. 100 years after his death, 1916-2016 will be celebrated in San Francisco thins month. Come and do honor the father of modernism Rubén Darío with a night full of poetry, song, folklore and culture – with more than 14 participants, which include fans, and local writers and poets.
On This Jan. 16, 2016, at the Mission Cultural Center at 6 p.m.

The Sixth Bay Area Youth Orchestra Festival At Davies Symphony Hall
The San Francisco Symphony Youth Orchestra (SFSYO) and its Music Director Donato Cabrera, host the sixth Bay Area Youth Orchestra Festival (BAYOF) at Davies Symphony Hall.
The El Camino Youth Symphony, Marin Symphony Youth Orchestra, Oakland Symphony Youth Orchestra, and Young People’s Symphony Orchestra join the SFS Youth Orchestra in a benefit concert for underserved youth. Each of the ensembles takes a turn performing on the stage, showcasing five of the Bay Area’s most prominent youth orchestras, 500 young musicians in total. The concert concludes with a piece by the “Festival Orchestra” made up of selected musicians from all five ensembles and led by Festival Orchestra Director Alasdair Neale.
On Sunday, January 17 at 3 p.m. Tickets: $70 reserved seating, $25 general admission, half price for 17 and under in general admission only.
Tickets are available at sfsymphony.org, by phone at 415-864-6000, and at the Davies Symphony Hall Box Office, on Grove Street between Van Ness Avenue and Franklin Street in San Francisco.

Placas: The Most Dangerous Tattoo
Starring Ric Salinas of Culture Clash
A Richmond Premiere
PLACAS:  The Most Dangerous Tattoo, the celebrated play by Paul S. Flores, will make its Richmond debut on Thursday, Jan. 21, 2016. Performances take place at East Bay Center for the Performing Arts Iron Triangle Theater.
Directed by the Latino Theater Company’s Fidel Gómez, PLACAS (barrio slang for body tattoos) is a bilingual tale of fathers and sons, transformation and redemption that illuminates one man’s determination to reunite his family after surviving civil war in El Salvador, immigration, deportation, prison and street violence. PLACAS stars Ric Salinas, a founding member of the critically acclaimed performance group Culture Clash, as Fausto “Placas” C arbajal, a Salvadoran immigrant who tries to reclaim his family while letting go of his gangbanger past.
Flores interviewed more than 100 gang members, parents and intervention workers in the Bay Area, Los Angeles and El Salvador to develop material for the script.
Salinas’ role of Fausto is loosely based on the experiences of ex-gang member Alex Sánchez, founder of the Los Angeles-based violence prevention non-profit Homies Unidos.
Starring Ricardo Salinas, with Zilah Mendoza,  Xavi Moreno, Sarita Ocón, Eric Aviles, Emiliano Torres, Edgar Barboza
Thursday-Sunday Jan. 21-24, 2016, at 7:30 p.m. East Bay Center for the Performing Arts, 339 11th St, Richmond, CA 94801, $15 in advance; $15 at the door ($5 off discount for students and groups). For info call 510-234-5624, 415-399-9554 or visit www.placas.org.

Unseen Art: 3D printing classical painting for the blind

by the El Reportero’s news services

“You can look but you can’t touch.” That’s one of the first rules of museums, which house priceless works of art. But what about the community of blind and visually impaired who use their sense of touch to experience the world? The Unseen Art Project is an initiative to make art more accessible and inclusive by using 3D-printing technology to create replicas of masterpieces that can be touched ’till your heart is content.
“There are many people in the world who have heard of classical artworks their whole lives but are unable to see them,” says Marc Dillon, a Helsinki-based designer who wants to make works like the Mona Lisa touchable. In order to make his vision a reality, Dillon has recently established a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo. He hopes to raise enough money to create an online repository where artists can contribute 3D data of artworks and anyone with a 3D printer will be able to print it out.
With the price of 3D printers drastically coming down in recent years, Dillon’s project has the potential to “touch” a large population of people who have an interest in art but have never been able see it. As the campaign points out, “It would be a revolution to get blind people going to art galleries, people hate them because there is nothing there to touch!” (via The Creators Project)

Cartagena Film Festival to pay tribute to Philippine director Mendoza
The International Film Festival of Cartagena (FICCI) will pay tribute to the work of Philippine filmmaker Brillante Mendoza with the screening of nine of his films, during the next event in March.
FICCI organizers praised the importance of the films made by Mendoza, who approaches the reality with rawness and tackles the harsh social events of the country with a bold and innovative vision on issues that are usually avoided by most commercial filmmakers.
A report issued by the promotion department of the festival indicates that participants will have the opportunity to appreciate the films made by Mendoza, a director who began his career as a production designer for film and theater and art director in advertising.
There are four films that will be premiered in Colombia during the festival, running from March 2nd to 7th, Masajista (Masseur) 2005, which won the Golden Leopard at the Film Festival of Locarno (Switzerland); Calor de verano (Summer Heat) 2006, El profesor (Professor) 2006 and Hijo adoptivo (Adopted son) 2007.
The tribute also includes the screening of two films, which earned him recognition in consecutive years at the Cannes Film Festival: Servicio (Service) 2008, and Kinatay 2009.
The tribute will be completed with Lola 2009, and Tu vientre (Your belly) 2012, which competed for the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival, along with his most recent film Trampa (Trap), which won special mention by the Ecumenical Jury at the Cannes Festival in 2015.
Mendoza, 56, has made 20 films, many of which have been prizewinning at major international festivals, and he recently received the title of Knight of Arts given by the French Government.

If Capitalism is dead, this is why

by Jon Rappoport

“An era of corruption is built for those who lead corrupt lives. They revel in the era. They belong. They are home. They don’t care what you call the prevailing system, they’ll find their way, because they know the unspoken rules and how things actually work. Naïve idealists and academic hair-splitters? The corrupt eat them for breakfast.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

The recent acceleration of attacks on capitalism leaves no ground un-scorched. Whatever capitalism is, it’s all bad. It needs to be banned. A wiser and saner alternative must be found—and naturally that alternative will be handed down from Above, where wondrous altruists in government can point us toward the Promised Land.
For the sake of humanity, they will assume the reins of power. They’ll organize businesses and companies and corporations under the umbrella of government, and all will be well.
Forget the fact that they cooperate and collude and conspire and commit crimes with their erstwhile corporate and banking partners. That’s a minor footnote.
Merriam-Webster defines capitalism as: “an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.”
Boiling it down further: you start a company; you own the company; you make a product and you sell it at a price you determine. People buy the product if they choose to.
This arrangement is not evil. You could turn it into a criminal enterprise, if you wanted to. For example, you could make a product that is poison, advertise it as medicine, and pay off those who might expose your ruse. But in that case, you’ve perverted the primary capitalist arrangement.
You would be prosecuted, if discovered. Well, you would be, if law-enforcement personnel were honest. If they weren’t, you could get away with murder.
Now, suppose there are 10,000 companies who do get away with murder. Suppose, to take things further, there are governments who collude with some of these companies and go to war, against other nations, so the companies can obtain access to raw materials they want, in order to manufacture their products.
Is this conspiracy an intrinsic part of capitalism? Is it? Or is it a perversion of the basic capitalist arrangement?
Some would argue that capitalism naturally breeds this perversion, and therefore it is an evil system. But that argument has a flaw. In order to propose it, you need to assume there are a fairly large number of people, in significant positions, who will commit crimes and enable crimes, on an ongoing basis.
And if so, those criminals will pervert any economic system in which they participate. Socialism, Communism, Fascism, State Corporatism, and so on. Therefore, any economic system will turn out to be evil.
Those “idealists” who rail against capitalism are, at best, railing against criminals. They tend to ignore the fact that law-enforcement personnel fail to punish criminals. This is, and always was, the problem.
Capitalism isn’t the problem.
For example, in the early days of the American Republic, state legislatures, fearing the power of corporations, adopted stringent rules: every corporation doing business in a state had to be charted by the legislature; and any corporation doing harm to the public would have its charter yanked. It would be kicked out of the state.
But this state system was eventually swallowed up by corrupt legislators, judges, and corporate criminals.
Do you really want to believe that these states, if they adopted socialism, would have eliminated those criminals?
I’m not even bothering to make the argument that capitalism fosters greater achievement and freedom than socialism. I’m just talking about criminals.
A society in which a large number of people were awake, intelligent, and courageous would directly face the question: what do we do about criminals? How do we ferret them out, how do we prosecute them, how do we keep them from being protected, how do we keep them from gaining too much power?
Abject failure in that regard guarantees the corruption of any political and economic system. Only addled fools would assume that “a more just system” would correct the underlying problem.
When I say “criminal,” in this context, I’m talking about Wall Street thieves; makers of harmful products; bureaucrats who protect harmful products and their producers; legislators who bring pork to their districts; bankers who invent money out of thin air; corporate monopolists who crush their competition; corporate leaders who promote, through their government cronies, wars and invasions; academics and researchers who lie about science in order to elevate corporate profits; egregious polluters; government/corporate partners who destroy jobs at home and set up shop in foreign lands, where slaves work in unconscionable conditions; governments that expand the bloat of their work-forces for no good reason…and so forth and so on.
The levels and extent of corruption are extraordinary, yes. Because, over a very long period of time, criminals have been nurtured, protected, aided, and secretly declared immune from prosecution.
This is not capitalism. This is endemic corruption, and if you need an example from the annals of socialism, examine the old USSR.
It’s all too easy to say there is no solution and the human race is doomed. I’ve known many such critics, and they all exhibit a grim passivity coated with self-serving cynicism. Under cover of “knowing the score,” they’re making excuses for their own misery.
The answer lies in raising children who are honest; who are smart; who are genuinely educated; who are beyond the fatal flaw of buying into the latest flimsy fly-by-night idiot’s-delight idealism; who will stand up for their principles; who believe in individual power and responsibility; who don’t see the benefit of turning into chronic low-level liars; who are liberated from whining and moaning; who refuse to go along with the crowd; who mix and mingle with enough life-as-it-is to avoid becoming androids and robots; who can spot con artists and shuck-and-jive altruists at a thousand yards; who see what criminals at all levels are doing to those around them; who have the imagination to envision a different world…
And that takes a certain kind of parent.
That is not the responsibility of the State. It doesn’t take a village. It doesn’t take a politician with “a better answer.” It doesn’t take paralyzing fear. Or surrender. Or fairy tales and rainbows.
It takes individuals. Each one unique. Each one alive and awake. Each one rejecting the decaying nature of criminals. Criminals in the street, criminals in the halls of government, criminals in the boardrooms.
No excuses. No rationalizations.

A history of Corporate Rule and Popular protest – Part 1

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:

Dear readers, Did you know that we are actually ruled by corporations, and that our country is a corporation, and that its officers (police, army, courts, etc) are actually agents of a corporation that are there to serve you or me?
In this following article, written by Richard Heinberg, sometime ago, you will discover a piece of history that probably you have never been exposed to during your lifetime and education. Due to the length of this piece, El Reportero will publish it in parts. THIS IS PART 1 OF A SERIES.

by Richard Heinberg

The corporation was invented early in the colonial era as a grant of privilege extended by the Crown to a group of investors, usually to finance a trade expedition. The corporation limited the liability of investors to the amount of their investment–a right not held by ordinary citizens. Corporate charters set out the specific rights and obligations of the individual corporation, including the amount to be paid to the Crown in return for the privilege granted.
Thus were born the East India Company, which led the British colonization of India, and Hudson’s Bay Company, which accomplished the same purpose in Canada. Almost from the beginning, Britain deployed state military power to further corporate interests–a practice that has continued to the present. Also from the outset, corporations began pressuring government to expand corporate rights and to limit corporate responsibilities.
The corporation was a legal invention–a socio-economic mechanism for concentrating and deploying human and economic power. The purpose of the corporation was and is to generate profits for its investors. As an entity, it has no other purpose; it acknowledges no higher value.
Many people understood early on that since corporations do not serve society as a whole, but only their investors, there is therefore always a danger that the interests of corporations and those of the general populace will come into conflict. Indeed, the United States was born of a revolution not just against the British monarchy but against the power of corporations. Many of the American colonies had been chartered as corporations (the Virginia Company, the Carolina Company, the Maryland Company, etc.) and were granted monopoly power over lands and industries considered crucial to the interests of the Crown.
Much of the literature of the revolutionaries was filled with denunciations of the “long train of abuses” of the Crown and its instruments of dominance, the corporations. As the yoke of the Crown corporations was being thrown off, Thomas Jefferson railed against “the general prey of the rich on the poor”. Later, he warned the new nation against the creation of “immortal persons” in the form of corporations. The American revolutionaries resolved that the authority to charter corporations should lie not with governors, judges or generals, but only with elected legislatures.
At first, such charters as were granted were for a fixed time, and legislatures spelled out the rules each business should follow. Profit-making corporations were chartered to build turnpikes, canals and bridges, to operate banks and to engage in industrial manufacture. Some citizens argued against even these few, limited charters, on the grounds that no business should be granted special privileges and that owners should not be allowed to hide behind legal shields. Thus the requests for many charters were denied, and existing charters were often revoked. Banks were kept on a short leash, and (in most states) investors were held liable for the debts and harms caused by their corporations.
All of this began to change in the mid-19th century. According to Richard Grossman and Frank Adams in Taking Care of Business: “Corporations were abusing their charters to become conglomerates and trusts. They were converting the nation’s treasures into private fortunes, creating factory systems and company towns. Political power began flowing to absentee owners intent upon dominating people and nature.”
Grossman and Adams note that: “In factory towns, corporations set wages, hours, production processes and machine speeds. They kept blacklists of labor organizers and workers who spoke up for their rights. Corporate officials forced employees to accept humiliating conditions, while the corporations agreed to nothing.”
The authors quote Julianna, a Lowell, Massachusetts, factory worker, who wrote: “Incarcerated within the walls of a factory, while as yet mere children, drilled there from five till seven o’clock, year after year.what, we would ask, are we to expect, the same system of labor prevailing, will be the mental and intellectual character of future generations.a race fit only for corporation tools and time-serving slaves?… Shall we not hear the response from every hill and vale: ‘Equal rights, or death to the corporations’?”
Industrialists and bankers hired private armies to keep workers in line, bought newspapers and (quoting Grossman and Adams again): “.painted politicians as villains and businessmen as heroes. Bribing state legislators, they then announced legislators were corrupt, that they used too much of the public’s resources and time to scrutinise every charter application and corporate operation. Corporate advocates campaigned to replace existing chartering laws with general incorporation laws that set up simple administrative procedures, claiming this would be more efficient. What they really wanted was the end of legislative authority over charters.”
During the Civil War, government spending brought corporations unprecedented wealth. “Corporate managers developed the techniques and the ability to organize production on an ever grander scale,” according to Grossman and Adams. “Many corporations used their wealth to take advantage of war and Reconstruction years to get the tariff, banking, railroad, labor, and public lands legislation they wanted.”
In 1886, the US Supreme Court declared that corporations were henceforth to be considered “persons” under the law, with all of the constitutional rights that designation implies.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, passed to give former slaves equal rights, has been invoked approximately ten times more frequently on behalf of corporations than on behalf of African Americans. Likewise the First Amendment, guaranteeing free speech, has been invoked to guarantee corporations the “right” to influence the political process through campaign contributions, which the courts have equated with “speech.”
If corporations are “persons”, they are persons with qualities and powers that no flesh-and-blood human could ever possess–immortality, the ability to be in many places at once, and (increasingly) the ability to avoid liability. They are also “persons” with no sense of moral responsibility, since their only legal mandate is to produce profits for their investors.
Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, corporations reshaped every aspect of life in America and much of the rest of the world. The factory system turned self-sufficient small farmers into wage-earners and transformed the family from an interdependent economic production unit to a consumption-oriented collection of individuals with separate jobs. Advertising turned productive citizens into “consumers”. Business leaders campaigned to create public schools to train children in factory-system obedience to schedules and in the performance of isolated, meaningless tasks. Meanwhile, corporations came to own and dominate sources of information and entertainment, and to control politicians and judges.
During two periods, corporations faced a challenge: the 1890s (a depression period when Populists demanded regulation of railroad rates, heavy taxation of land held only for speculation, and an increase in the money supply), and the 1930s (when a profound crisis of capitalism led hundreds of thousands of workers and armies of the unemployed to demand government regulation of the economy and to win a 40-hour week, a minimum-wage law, the right to organize, and the outlawing of child labor). But in both cases, corporate capitalism emerged intact.
In the words of historian Howard Zinn : “The rich still controlled the nation’s wealth, as well as its laws, courts, police, newspapers, churches, colleges. Enough help had been given to enough people to make Roosevelt a hero to millions, but the same system that had brought depression and crisis.remained.”
World War II, like previous wars, brought huge profits to corporations via government contracts. But following this war, military spending was institutionalized, ostensibly to fight the “Cold War”. Despite occasional regulatory setbacks, corporations seized ever more power, and increasingly transcended national boundaries, loyalties and sovereignties altogether.

Pervasive industrial chemicals are destroying children’s brains

by David Gutiérrez

Scientists are increasingly uncovering the ways in which ubiquitous industrial chemicals are damaging children’s brain development, condemning a generation of children to neurobehavioral disorders from hyperactivity to autism.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 1.8 million more children diagnosed with developmental disabilities from 2006 to 2008 than there were a decade before. Over that same time period, there was a 33 percent increase in cases of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and a shocking 300 percent increase in cases of autism.

Between 10 to 15 percent of all U.S. children will eventually be diagnosed with some neurobehavioral disorder; the real prevalence is believed to be even higher.
The problem appears to be worldwide, and is so severe that prominent researchers Philippe Grandjean of the University of Southern Denmark and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Philip Landrigan of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York have called it a “pandemic.”
Increased diagnosis cannot fully explain the increase, say many researchers, including Irva Hertz-Piccioto of the University of California-Davis. The rates are actually increasing, and many scientists believe that environmental contaminants are largely to blame.
How household and industrial pollution damage the developing brain
Brain damage begins in the womb, when mothers are exposed to toxic chemicals – many of which pass through the placenta and straight to the fetus. Because the brain is still developing at this early stage, it is actually especially vulnerable to long-term disruption.
“The brain is so extremely sensitive to external stimulation,” Grandjean said.
Many chemicals and metals have been long known to pose risks to children’s brains, yet even these- such as lead, mercury, or organophosphate pesticides – are still widespread in the environment. Pesticide residues are found on foods or in the air and soil in agricultural areas; lead is still found in paint or even children’s toys; and mercury is found in fish and in air pollution from coal-fired power plants.
But science is now uncovering entire new families of problematic chemicals in everything from plastics to furniture to indoor and outdoor air. Many of these are chemicals previously identified as endocrine (hormone) disruptors, which researchers are only now realizing can also damage the brain. This is because hormones such as thyroid or sex hormones play important roles in brain developments.
Endocrine disruptors believed to damage the brain include flame retardants (found in furniture, electronics and infant sleep products), PCBs, plastics chemicals such as BPA and phthalates, and perfluorinated compounds such as Teflon.
Recent research has also shown that many widespread air pollutants can also damage children’s brains – such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, a byproduct of burning fossil fuels, which has been linked to ADHD.
Regulatory overhaul needed
Realizing how dangerous these toxic substances are, we naturally want to reduce our children’s exposure to them. But it can be hard to identify which chemicals are dangerous, and many of those already identified are now so prevalent that it is nearly impossible to avoid them. In addition, many toxic substances are used in products where they do not need to be labeled or identified.
Grandjean and Landrigan place much of the blame for this situation on the U.S. regulatory system, which does not require manufacturers to prove chemicals safe before they are permitted for use.
“Untested chemicals should not be presumed to be safe to brain development, and chemicals in existing use and all new chemicals must therefore be tested for developmental neurotoxicity,” they wrote in an article in the prestigious journal The Lancet.
“To me it is very clear we have to set up a different system to better protect the brains of the future,” Grandjean said. (Natural News).

Real life ‘Castaway’ survivor sued for $1 million by family of a man they claim he ATE

by Daniel Barker

In a bizarre case reminiscent of both Gilligan’s Island and Silence of the Lambs, an El Salvadoran fisherman is being sued for $1 million for alleged cannibalism.
Salvador Alvarenga, 36, made international headlines in January last year when he washed ashore on the Marshall Islands in the Pacific Ocean, after spending more than a year adrift on his boat that was crippled in a storm during a fishing expedition off the coast of Mexico.
During the 15 months at sea, Alvarenga’s boat drifted 6,700 miles, before reaching the remote Pacific islands where he was rescued.
Although Alvarenga somehow managed to survive the ordeal, his 22-year-old crew mate, Ezequiel Cordoba, did not.
According to Alvarenga, the younger man died because he could not eat the raw birds and turtle blood which were the only food available. He claims that Cordoba succumbed to starvation early on, and that he kept the body in the boat for “company” for six days before eventually tossing it overboard.
Cordoba’s family disputes this account, claiming that Alvarenga ate the flesh of his crew mate in order to survive.
Alvarenga denies the allegations and his lawyer, Ricardo Cucalón, suggests that the reason the family has suddenly filed the lawsuit is because his client’s book detailing the ordeal has just been published.
Cucalón said, “I believe that this demand is part of the pressure from this family to divide the proceeds of royalties.
“Many believe the book is making my client a rich man, but what he will earn is much less than people think.”
‘A tale of a fateful trip’
The tragic journey began in November 2012, when Alvarenga and Cordoba set out in a small boat from a fishing village on the southern Mexican coast in the state of Chiapas. The two men had embarked on a tuna fishing expedition when they encountered bad weather and disappeared.
After a fruitless two-week search, local authorities gave up on finding the two men. Meanwhile, the boat began drifting further out to sea.
Nearly a year and a half later the boat and its sole surviving passenger ended up washing ashore on Ebon, an atoll in the Marshall Islands.
The rescue of Alvarenga captured the attention of the media and the public since it seemed scarcely believable that anyone could survive so long adrift in the Pacific in such a small boat, and without supplies.
Alvarenga maintains he is still alive because “I always had faith in God that I was going to live, asking Him every day, every night.”
He said he survived by eating raw fish, birds and jellyfish that he managed to catch with his hands, and by drinking his own urine and turtle blood.
Is cannibalism legal?
As distasteful as it might seem, many people throughout history have survived such ordeals by eating human flesh. Two famous cases include the ill-fated Donner party – a group of settlers who became stranded in the snow while trying to cross the Rocky Mountains during the 19th century – and a group of soccer players who survived an airplane crash in the Andes during the 1970s.
An article in The Guardian posed the question: “Is eating someone’s flesh in such extreme conditions against the law?”
The answer, according to senior lecturer Samantha Pegg of Nottingham Trent University, is no – at least in the United Kingdom. “There is no offence of cannibalism in our jurisdiction,” she said.
Pegg pointed to a similar case from the 19th century in which a four-man English crew were shipwrecked en route to Australia. Faced with possible starvation, two of the men killed and ate the 17-year-old cabin boy who had fallen ill. The two were charged with murder, the third survivor was not – even though he ate some of the flesh.
It’s a terrible thought to contemplate, but it’s been proven time and time again that humans will do almost anything to survive.
How about you? Could you eat human flesh if your own survival depended on it?

Deadly hypocrisy exposed as world’s on the world’s biggest gun dealer

U.S. moves to limit America’s access to guns

by Jay Syrmopoulos

Washington, D.C. – On Tuesday, President Obama announced that he’ll bypass Congress, by executive action, in an effort force more gun sellers to get licensed federally and to increase the amount of buyers required to undergo background checks.
While the federal government attempts to limit Americans’ access to guns, the American arms industry has had no such impediments placed in its way as it sells deadly arms to tyrannical regimes and terrorist groups across the globe.
Just five years ago, the Obama administration secured the largest arms sale in the history of the world when he sold $60 billion in weapons to a country who beheads more people than ISIS, Saudi Arabia.
The American defense industry is the undisputed champion of the global arms market, as the U.S. exported over $36.2 billion in weaponry in 2014, accounting for over 60 percent of the total arms sold worldwide, according to a report by the Congressional Research Service.
Trailing the U.S. in weapons receipts is Russia, with $10.2 billion in sales in 2014, followed by Sweden with $5.5 billion, France with $4.4 billion and China with $2.2 billion, reports The New York Times.
It seems logically inconsistent to condone being the merchant of death to whole of the globe, while at the same time pushing to curtail or limit American citizens’ right to own a gun in the name of stopping killing.
Even though the U.S. Constitution’s 2nd Amendment gives Americans the right to have arms, a right that is defended fiercely by many of its citizens, the U.S. government has continually attempted to limit and usurp gun ownership under the guise of making Americans safer.
Republican presidential candidates have already weighed in, promising to reverse Obama’s unilateral executive order if they win the White House in 2016, and legal challenges to the new guidelines are a virtual certainty.
According to a report by Reuters:
Under the changes, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) will issue guidelines intended to narrow exceptions to a system that requires sellers to check with the Federal Bureau of Investigation to determine whether buyers have criminal records, are charged with crimes or have mental health conditions that would bar them from owning a gun.
On the surface, the guidelines seem benign, but the creeping intention is a slow and steady movement towards the eventual disarming of the general American public, with special exemptions and costly permits for those deemed worthy to qualify for what was intended to be a right of all Americans.
Where are the background checks for the “moderate Syrian rebels”?
The American government apparently thinks it’s acceptable to allow U.S. companies to sell weapons to despotic regimes, such as the Saudis, who in turn supply those same weapons to Islamic fundamentalist terror groups, but wants to make it harder for American citizens to buy a gun.
Have Americans also forgotten that under the Obama administration, countless innocent civilians have been blown to shreds by US drones firing hellfire missiles.
In October, an aerial bombing in the Afghan city of Kunduz was conducted by the UnitThe bombardment left more than 20 members of staff and patients dead and dozens more injured. Information released after the attack revealed that the US knew the target was, in fact, a hospital occupied by unarmed patients and staff. If anyone needs to be checked before obtaining dangerous weapons, it the U.S. government.
What most of the gun grabbers fail to understand is, as John Locke stated — “self-defense is the first law of nature,” as each person owns their own life and no other person having a right to take that life.
Those who would attempt to stop you from defending yourself are attacking the very right from which all other rights are derived; protection of one’s own life.
It seems that many politicians have a vested anti-gun agenda, as they act willfully ignorant of the fact that gun deaths and violent crime in America are at near historic lows, with the homicide rate being cut nearly in half. In fact, although most Americans think the number of gun crimes has risen, the nation’s overall gun death rate, which includes suicides and homicides, has declined 31% since 1993, according to Pew Research.
Instead of demonizing the one hundred and fifty million people in America who legally own guns and who don’t go around shooting up churches, schools or children, or vilifying a simple tool, perhaps we should work to identify the root causes of violence in our society and then attempt to address them.
Until Americans educate themselves on the cause of this violence, uninformed and corrupt lawmakers will continue to focus on controlling the symptoms.
Jay Syrmopoulos is a political analyst, free thinker, researcher, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs. Jay’s work has been published on Ben Swann’s Truth in Media, Truth-Out, Raw Story, MintPress News, as well as many other sites. You can follow him on Twitter @sirmetropolis, on Facebook at Sir Metropolis and now on tsu.
Click here to view the article with its images:
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/obama-moves-limit-americans-access-guns-u-s-dominates-global-arms-market/

Ex officials arrested for civil war killings in Guatemala

by the El Reportero’s wire services

Reports Associated Press:
Prosecutors on Wednesday announced the arrest of more than a dozen former military and government officials for alleged crimes against humanity committed during Guatemala’s civil war, and initiated human rights proceedings against an ally of President-elect Jimmy Morales.
Among the 14 people detained was Benedicto Lucas García, a former army commander credited with founding paramilitary groups during the 1960-1996 conflict. He is also the brother of the late President Fernando Romeo Lucas García, who ruled Guatemala with an iron fist from 1978 to 1982.
Also detained were retired Gen. Francisco Luis Gordillo, who helped bring former dictator Jose Efrain Ríos Montt to power from 1982 to 1983, and Byron Barrientos, who was interior minister during the 2000-2004 presidency of Alfonso Portillo.
The suspects face charges of crimes against humanity involving massacres and disappearances of people by security forces under their command. They were ordered held in a military base prison ahead of a court hearing expected Friday.
“The cases that we have documented were (attacks) against the non-combatant civilian population including children,” Attorney General Thelma Aldana said. She described them as among “the largest forced disappearances in Latin America.”
Guatemalan media broadcast images of the former officials in handcuffs, some of them crying and saying their work during the war only involved fighting guerrilla bands.
“If I killed, I killed in combat, leading my troops and not as a coward or anything like that,” Lucas told reporters at the courthouse.
Prosecutors also moved to have the immunity of office lifted for Edgar Justino Ovalle, a member and co-founder of the party of Morales, who is scheduled to be inaugurated as president next week. As a sitting congressman, Ovalle is not subject to criminal prosecution unless lawmakers vote to end his immunity.
Peace accords brought an end to the 36-year civil war in 1996. Government security forces have been blamed for the vast majority of the 245,000 killings and disappearances during the conflict.
The detentions involve incidents such as the 1982 massacre at Plan de Sánchez, Baja Verapaz department, in which soldiers and militia members tortured, sexually abused and killed local residents. (Sonia Pérez D, AP).

Cuban migrants start their move to El Salvador
The Government of Costa Rica scheduled for Tuesday the departure of the first group of Cubans who are stranded since mid-November along its border with intention to reach the United States.
According to an official release, 180 people will go that day on a charter flight to El Salvador, from where then they will be aboard a bus going to Guatemala to continue to the border with Mexico and finally across land towards the northern nation.
Authorities based their selection on the date of arrival to Costa Rica and the ability to pay for the trip, which in total will cost them $535 dollars because it includes transportation, food, taxes and out of each country, most health insurance.
The statement said that the entire process will be governed by the immigration legislation of each of the States on route, namely, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala and Mexico.

The Sixth Bay Area Orchestra Festival at Davies Symphony Hall

Compiled by the El Reportero’s staff

The San Francisco Symphony Youth Orchestra (SFSYO) and its Music Director Donato Cabrera, host the sixth Bay Area Youth Orchestra Festival (BAYOF) at Davies Symphony Hall.
The El Camino Youth Symphony, Marin Symphony Youth Orchestra, Oakland Symphony Youth Orchestra, and Young People’s Symphony Orchestra join the SFS Youth Orchestra in a benefit concert for underserved youth. Each of the ensembles takes a turn performing on the stage, showcasing five of the Bay Area’s most prominent youth orchestras, 500 young musicians in total. The concert concludes with a piece by the “Festival Orchestra” made up of selected musicians from all five ensembles and led by Festival Orchestra Director Alasdair Neale.
On Sunday, January 17 at 3 p.m. Tickets: $70 reserved seating, $25 general admission, half price for 17 and under in general admission only.
Tickets are available at sfsymphony.org, by phone at 415-864-6000, and at the Davies Symphony Hall Box Office, on Grove Street between Van Ness Avenue and Franklin Street in San Francisco.

Placas: The Most Dangerous Tattoo
Starring Ric Salinas of Culture Clash
A Richmond Premiere
PLACAS:  The Most Dangerous Tattoo, the celebrated play by Paul S. Flores, will make its Richmond debut on Thursday, Jan. 21, 2016. Performances take place at East Bay Center for the Performing Arts Iron Triangle Theater.
Directed by the Latino Theater Company’s Fidel Gómez, PLACAS (barrio slang for body tattoos) is a bilingual tale of fathers and sons, transformation and redemption that illuminates one man’s determination to reunite his family after surviving civil war in El Salvador, immigration, deportation, prison and street violence. PLACAS stars Ric Salinas, a founding member of the critically acclaimed performance group Culture Clash, as Fausto “Placas” Carbajal, a Salvadoran immigrant who tries to reclaim his family while letting go of his gangbanger past.
Flores interviewed more than 100 gang members, parents and intervention workers in the Bay Area, Los Angeles and El Salvador to develop material for the script.
Salinas’ role of Fausto is loosely based on the experiences of ex-gang member Alex Sánchez, founder of the Los Angeles-based violence prevention non-profit Homies Unidos.
Starring Ricardo Salinas, with Zilah Mendoza,  Xavi Moreno, Sarita Ocón, Eric Aviles, Emiliano Torres, Edgar Barboza
Thursday-Sunday January 21-24, 2016, at 7:30 p.m. East Bay Center for the Performing Arts, 339 11th St, Richmond, California 94801, $15 in advance; $15 at the door ($5 off discount for students and groups). For info call 510-234-5624, 415-399-9554 or visit www.placas.org.