Wednesday, September 4, 2024
Home Blog Page 175

Peru to withdraw its ‘gender ideology’ school curriculum

The Peruvian government will withdraw a 2016 national school curriculum that has been widely criticized for its “gender ideology”

by the El Reportero’s wire services

The First Civil Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Lima granted a precautionary measure to the collective Parents in Action (PEA) so that the Ministry of Education (Minedu) partially suspends the implementation of the National Basic Education Curriculum; specifically in a text referring to the gender approach.

The room, chaired by Judge Ana Valcárcel, ordered the suspension of the effectiveness of Ministerial Resolution No. 281-2016-Minedu, “only in the extreme” that approves the curriculum regarding the gender approach, in the part that is consigned : “Although what we consider feminine or masculine is based on a sexual biological difference, these are notions that we build day by day, in our interactions”.

In August of last year, the same court declared partially based the popular action lawsuit filed by the PEA collective and annulled that same text in the pedagogical guide. The group of parents requested the total elimination of the curriculum, due to the fact that, according to the Minedu, it included provisions on sexuality that were not in accordance with what the parents had agreed upon.

Vote pending

Both the Minedu and the collective appealed, and the case was assumed by the Permanent Constitutional and Social Law Chamber of the Supreme Court. The Education sector requested the reversal of the judgment in first instance of the Civil Chamber, considering that the court had issued a “subjective opinion” in its decision.

Meanwhile, the PEA collective appealed for the pedagogical guide to be completely eliminated, since – they indicated – the partial cancellation of the approach and the text that is currently in dispute did not suppress the notions that, according to them, were collected from the so-called ‘gender ideology.’

Precisely, last Tuesday the Chamber of Constitutional and Social Permanent Law of the Supreme Court of the Judicial Power (PJ) left to the vote the appeals filed by both parties. This instance, which is the final one in the ordinary way, has a maximum period of 30 days to cast its vote. Meanwhile, the application of the precautionary measure is immediate.

Trump vows to end birthright citizenship with an executive order, Speaker Ryan says no way.

Some constitutional scholars believe it’s protected by the 14th Amendment and cannot be changed by a stroke of the president’s pen.

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he plans to end the “ridiculous” law that allows the right to citizenship to all children born in US territory, something explicitly established by the country’s Constitution.

“We are the only country in the world where a person comes and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a US citizen for 85 years, with all the benefits, “Trump said in an interview with the digital newspaper Axios.

Trump did not mention that, in addition to the United States, Canada also has a similar norm that grants citizenship to those born in its territory. “It’s ridiculous. Ridiculous. And it has to end, “he added.

During the 2016 election campaign, Trump already explored the idea, although experts believe that it faces significant obstacles and would trigger a protracted legal battle to be an explicit part of the country’s Constitution.

In the fourteenth amendment of the US Magna Carta, it states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and therefore subject to its jurisdiction, are US citizens. and the state in which they reside.

“Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, had this reaction.

“The president cannot erase the Constitution with an executive order, and the 14th Amendment’s citizenship guarantee is clear. This is a transparent and blatantly unconstitutional attempt to sow division and fan the flames of anti-immigrant hatred in the days ahead of the midterms.”

The Electoral College debate

NOTE FROM THE EDITOR

Dear readers:

I’ve often been asked the question and have heard concerns from people on the street, whether we should abolish the Electoral College (EC) in the U.S. And this has been more accentuated after Donald Trump successfully won the presidential election thanks to the majority vote of the EC. My answer has always been, that if we do that, the US as we know it: a politically stable nation, it would easily become a dictatorship. The following article, written by Walter E. William, just hits the nail.
I believe it answers most, if not all, most questions about the role of the EC. In election time, It is something we should learn about, and why we should not listen to the extreme left suggestion to abolish the EC. – Marvin R

by Walter E. Williams

Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, seeking to represent New York’s 14th Congressional District, has called for the abolition of the Electoral College. Her argument came on the heels of the Senate’s confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. She was lamenting the fact that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, nominated by George W. Bush, and Justices Neil Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, nominated by Donald Trump, were court appointments made by presidents who lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College vote.

Hillary Clinton has long been a critic of the Electoral College. Just recently, she wrote in The Atlantic, “You won’t be surprised to hear that I passionately believe it’s time to abolish the Electoral College.”

Subjecting presidential elections to the popular vote sounds eminently fair to Americans who have been miseducated by public schools and universities. Worse yet, the call to eliminate the Electoral College reflects an underlying contempt for our Constitution and its protections for personal liberty. Regarding miseducation, the founder of the Russian Communist Party, Vladimir Lenin, said, “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.” His immediate successor, Josef Stalin, added, “Education is a weapon whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed.”

A large part of Americans’ miseducation is the often heard claim that we are a democracy. The word “democracy” appears nowhere in the two most fundamental documents of our nation — the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. In fact, our Constitution — in Article 4, Section 4 — guarantees “to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.” The Founding Fathers had utter contempt for democracy. James Madison, in Federalist Paper No. 10, said that in a pure democracy, “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual.” At the 1787 Constitutional Convention, Virginia Gov. Edmund Randolph said that “in tracing these evils to their origin, every man had found it in the turbulence and follies of democracy.” John Adams wrote: “Remember Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a Democracy Yet, that did not commit suicide.” At the Constitutional Convention, Alexander Hamilton said: “We are now forming a republican government. Real liberty” is found not in “the extremes of democracy but in moderate governments…. If we incline too much to democracy, we shall soon shoot into a monarchy.”

For those too dense to understand these arguments, ask yourselves: Does the Pledge of Allegiance say “to the democracy for which it stands” or “to the republic for which it stands”? Did Julia Ward Howe make a mistake in titling her Civil War song “Battle Hymn of the Republic”? Should she have titled it “Battle Hymn of the Democracy”?

The Founders saw our nation as being composed of sovereign states that voluntarily sought to join a union under the condition that each state admitted would be coequal with every other state. The Electoral College method of choosing the president and vice president guarantees that each state, whether large or small in area or population, has some voice in selecting the nation’s leaders. Were we to choose the president and vice president under a popular vote, the outcome of presidential races would always be decided by a few highly populated states. They would be states such as California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois and Pennsylvania, which contain 134.3 million people, or 41 percent of our population. Presidential candidates could safely ignore the interests of the citizens of Wyoming, Alaska, Vermont, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana and Delaware. Why? They have only 5.58 million Americans, or 1.7 percent of the U.S. population. We would no longer be a government “of the people”; instead, our government would be put in power by and accountable to the leaders and citizens of a few highly populated states.

Political satirist H.L. Mencken said, “The kind of man who wants the government to adopt and enforce his ideas is always the kind of man whose ideas are idiotic.”

(Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University).

Now that it’s legal, governor signs law allowing people to wipe away marijuana charges

California has official signed into law a process to allow those who’ve been crushed by the war on marijuana to have a life again

by The Free Thought Project

On Sunday, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed a bill that creates a process to expunge or reduce the sentences of people charged under the state’s marijuana laws before recreational cannabis was legalized this year. Enactment of this law takes another step toward nullifying federal marijuana prohibition in effect in California.

Assm. Rob Bonta (D-Alameda) introduced Assembly Bill 1793 (AB1793) in January. Under the new law, the court will automatically reduce or dismiss marijuana convictions pursuant to the Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) unless prosecutors successfully challenge the dismissal of charges or sentence reduction.

In November 2016, voters in California approved a ballot measure legalizing marijuana for general use by adults. The law went into effect on Jan. 1. Under the AUMA, any person charged under previous California marijuana laws can petition for the recall or dismissal of a sentence, dismissal and sealing of a conviction, or redesignation of a conviction of an offense for which a lesser offense or no offense would be imposed under new law.

Under AB1793, expungement will instead happen automatically without any petition necessary, effective July 1, 2020. The bill creates a process to identify people eligible for expungement and for prosecutors to challenge the automatic dismissal or reduction of charges.

The California Senate passed AB1793 by a 28-10 vote. The Assembly approved the measure by a 43-28 vote.

In the past, we’ve seen some opposition to marijuana legalization bills because the new laws generally leave those previously charged and convicted unprotected. The passage of AB1793 demonstrates an important strategic point. Passing bills that take a step forward sets the stage, even if they aren’t perfect. Opening the door clears the way for additional steps. You can’t take the second step before you take the first.

Enactment of AB1793 not only helps those with prior marijuana arrests and convictions on their record get a new start, it will also further undermine federal marijuana prohibition. As marijuana becomes more accepted and more states simply ignore the feds, the federal government is less able to enforce its unconstitutional laws.
FEDERAL PROHIBITION

However, all of this remains prohibited under the 1970 federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Of course, the federal government lacks any constitutional authority to ban or regulate marijuana within the borders of a state, despite the opinion of the politically connected lawyers on the Supreme Court. If you doubt this, ask yourself why it took a constitutional amendment to institute federal alcohol prohibition.

Legalization of marijuana in California removed a huge layer of laws prohibiting the possession and use of marijuana in the world’s sixth largest economy, something that will be extremely difficult for federal prohibitionists to overcome. FBI statistics show that law enforcement makes approximately 99 of 100 marijuana arrests under state, not federal law. By legalizing cannabis, California essentially sweeps away the basis for 99 percent of marijuana arrests.

Furthermore, figures indicate it would take 40 percent of the DEA’s yearly-budget just to investigate and raid all of the dispensaries in Los Angeles – a single city in a single state. That doesn’t include the cost of prosecution. The lesson? The feds lack the resources to enforce marijuana prohibition without state assistance.

A GROWING MOVEMENT

Colorado, Washington state, Oregon and Alaska were the first states to legalize recreational cannabis, and California, Nevada, Maine and Massachusetts joined them after ballot initiatives in favor of legalization passed in November 2016. In January, Vermont became the first state to legalize marijuana through a legislative act.

With 32 states allowing cannabis for medical use as well, the feds find themselves in a position where they simply can’t enforce prohibition anymore.

“The lesson here is pretty straightforward. When enough people say, ‘No!’ to the federal government, and enough states pass laws backing those people up, there’s not much the feds can do to shove their so-called laws, regulations or mandates down our throats,” Tenth Amendment Center founder and executive director Michael Boldin said.

Efforts to expand California’s marijuana law demonstrates another important reality. Once a state puts laws in place legalizing marijuana, it tends to eventually expand. As the state tears down some barriers, markets develop and demand expands. That creates pressure to further relax state law. These bills represent more steps forward for patients seeking alternative treatments and a further erosion of unconstitutional federal marijuana prohibition.

(Michael Maharrey is the Communications Director for the Tenth Amendment Center. He proudly resides in the original home of the Principles of ’98 – Kentucky. He is the author of the book, Our Last Hope: Rediscovering the Lost Path to Liberty).

Global economy: between a rock and a hard place

NOTE FROM TE EDITOR:

Dear readers:

I found this article so interesting and educating in how the global economy as it is developing in front of our own eyes, affects the whole world. And we all are affected by it, for being in the middle. Do you understand how the banking system – as a monetary paradigm – is imposed on all of us under the barrel of a gun?

by James Corbett

Well, it’s official: “Japan Inc.” is now “Bank of Japan Inc.”

Oh, OK, not officially official, but just about. As the Nikkei Asian Review reports, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) is now a top-10 shareholder in a whopping 40 percent of the listed companies in the country. That’s right, having purchased 25 trillion yen ($227 billion) worth of exchange-traded funds in the past eight years, Japan’s central bank is now one of the top 10 shareholders in 1,446 out of 3,735 companies listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

Even the banksters admit they’ve painted themselves into a corner with their stock buying frenzy. BOJ Governor Kuroda concedes that if the bank persists in pumping its funny money into the markets there will be serious “side effects” that could harm the entire banking sector. So they should turn off the spigot and drain the monetary swamp by raising rates, right? Nope. As BOJ board member Yutaka Harada points out, the banksters can’t reverse the tide and raise interest rates because “bond and stock prices would decline and the yen would appreciate,” completely negating the entire point of the asset purchases in the first place.

So what does all of this mean?

Well, if you’re Japanese it means your central bank is creating (as one Japan-based asset manager puts it) “a new form of financial socialism” from which “Nobody can see a smooth exit strategy.”

But more broadly, the economic pickle that Japan finds itself in right now is merely a small-scale example of the dilemma that the global economy is facing. Caught between the low interest global liquidity trap and the high interest global debt trap. Caught between the globalist “free trade” nightmare and the emerging trade war/hot war nightmare. Caught between the expansion of a predatory system that is designed to drain the wealth of the average worker and the collapse of that system, which will assuredly drain the wealth of the average worker.

The straits between these economic rocks and hard places couldn’t be any narrower. It’s enough to make Scylla and Charybdis look like a cakewalk.

But for those who fail to comprehend the bigger picture here, it should be stressed that this isn’t just about interest rates and bond yields. The point here isn’t what level the stock market is at or whether some trader in Jeddah is going to be selling oil in dollars or yuan. The real point, as I have been trying to stress in this column for some time, is that economics is never just economics. The global economy rests on a monetary paradigm. That monetary paradigm emerges not from some economic calculation but, more often than not, the barrel of a gun.

It’s no coincidence that the Bretton-Woods system instituting the US dollar reserve paradigm arose from the ashes of WWII. It’s no coincidence that that paradigm began to break down when the US started using its reserve currency privileges to run up the debt for the military-industrial complex. It’s no coincidence that the petrodollar paradigm which replaced Bretton-Woods rested on a military and geopolitical alliance with the Saudis. It’s no coincidence that the erosion of that paradigm is giving rise to worries about a Third World War and, presumably, a monetary reset.

It’s no coincidence because all of these things are directly related. The breakdown of the economic order is intimately tied to the breakdown of the geopolitical order. It’s part and parcel of the change that is occurring in the monetary order. And it is inseparable from the rising military tensions that accompany the decline of the American unipolar order.

Let’s highlight another “small” story that fills in one of the pieces of this giant jigsaw puzzle.

Earlier this week, China pitched an idea to EU diplomats attending a Sino-European summit in Beijing: “Join us in an anti-US trade alliance and together we can win the global trade war!” Multiple suggestions were proffered for what form such an alliance might take. China could open up more of its market to EU business as a gesture of good will, for instance, or the two powers could launch a joint action against the US at the World Trade Organization.

The EU’s reaction was swift: “Thanks, but no thanks!”

You have to admit, it was a bold gambit. The idea of the EU throwing Uncle Sam (and the almighty dollar) overboard for a few paper promises about “freer trade” from the notoriously mercantilist ChiComs is absurd.

But think about what it means that such an idea was even proposed. A few years ago, even a few months ago, such a plan would have been unthinkable. Today, it is merely fanciful. And tomorrow…?

This is what the breakdown of the global trading order is really about: Not the fluctuations in the trading accounts or currency reserves of this or that nation, but the reorganization of the alliances between those nations. And, if push comes to shove, the possible crossing of swords between nations.

Now couple this story with the BOJ shareholder story (or the Argentinian peso story, or the emerging market bond story, or the Iranian oil story, or any number of other stories from the world of economics, finance and trade) and the picture becomes even clearer: We are heading toward a crisis. The only question is what new order will emerge from that crisis.

As I discussed in my most recent edition of the “Questions For Corbett” series, a period of chaos, breakdown and crisis is necessary for a change in world order to occur. And whether that change leads to the New World Order that the powers-that-shouldn’t-be are constantly lusting after or a new flowering of human freedom is still very much up in the air.

In the end, that question will not be answered by the central bankers of the world. It will be answered by us. That answer lies in us withdrawing our support for the current system, choosing where to re-direct our energy and resources, refusing to fight the banksters’ wars for them, and creating the alternative system we want to see emerge from the chaos . . . or lying back and doing nothing. And I think we all know where that option leads.

Benefits of regular fasting

by Ben Fuchs

One of the healthiest lifestyle strategies is easy and won’t cost you anything. In fact you’ll probably end up making money in the long run. I’m talking about intermittent fasting (IF), a healthy idea that’s been practiced for thousands of years. Intermittent fasting turns on genes that stimulate growth and repair and anti-aging, especially in combination with exercise. If done correctly it can help keep the body in fat burning mode. And it’s got important effects on stimulating motivation and drive and brain power. After all when someone is young and ambitious we often say that they are… “hungry”

In a famous experiment in the 1940’s scientists from the University of Chicago showed that they could increase the lifespans of animals by up to 20 percent simply by denying them food every 3rd day. And in a review by that was published in 2007 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, researchers from U C Berkeley found that alternate day fasting could save lives by decreasing risks for heart disease and cancer, and diabetes, the three leading causes of death in the United States, Moreover they found that they’re important for the nervous system and the brain, improving cognitive function and providing protection from Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease.

There’s also an important insulin connection to the benefits of fasting. Insulin is a type of Master hormone, in the sense that it up-regulates many different cell activities; and it affects every single cell. The prime stimulus for insulin secretion is food. When we eat any carbs our protein cells get drenched in insulin. In addition to feeding cells, insulin tells cells to divide and grow. Insulin turns on cellular activates. Biochemists call that up-regulation, which, while important, is helpful only in the right context. For instance, if we’re lifting weight and we’re building muscle, exercising etc. If we live the typical American sedentary lifestyle, this up regulation is not necessarily a good thing. Elevated blood fats, hypertension, skin problems like acne and psoriasis, cysts and growths and endometriosis are all possibilities if cells are stuck in overdrive from too much exposure to insulin.

Even worse if we’re constantly eating and insulin is constantly being secreted eventually cells become immune to insulin’s effects on cell nourishment and feeding.
Unfortunately, you’ll still have enough insulin around to stimulate cell growth and division, and up-regulation activates, except now cells will be upregulated in state of starvation that’s VERY, VERY BAD!! This unfortunate insulin issue is behind every single chronic degenerative disease you can name. Doctors call the various breakdowns in the body that are associated with dysfunctional, messed up insulin, Metabolic Syndrome. Which means basically everything or anything can go wrong. High blood pressure, elevated blood fats and cholesterol, heart disease, cognitive breakdown etc. eye diseases, and osteoporosis are all examples of Metabolic Syndrome symptoms that can be traced back to elevated insulin secretion.

Of course using nutrients to potentize insulin is always a good idea. Vitamins like niacin, thiamine, Vitamin A and minerals, like chromium, vanadium and zinc can be helpful. You want make sure you’re getting some regular exercise too. But there is no quicker way to get insulin back in line and to improve longevity, increase muscle growth and generally slow down the aging process, than to reduce caloric intake and make it habit to fast once or twice a month. (Natural News)>

Carrots are the best veggies to eat for eye health

by Mary Miller

It’s no wonder carrots are a staple of most salads and dishes around the world, cakes included. Eating just one carrot a day can provide a person will multiple benefits, chief of which is maintaining excellent eye health.

The common carrot, also known by its scientific name of Daucus carota subsp. sativus, is a member of the carotenoid family. Like many other carotenoids, carrots contain beta-carotene, a powerful antioxidant which the body converts to vitamin A during digestion. The vitamin, in particular, is crucial to ocular health. Without it, a person is at risk of developing eye problems such as xerophthalmia, a progressive condition that can lead to impaired vision and night blindness. In small children, it could even result in possible blindness.

The average carrot has around 12,000 international units or IU of vitamin A or over 241 percent of what the body needs in a day. That means, that a cup of carrots has well over the recommended daily allowance of vitamin A for both men and women, both of whom only need 900 and 700 micrograms, respectively.

The uses of vitamin A

The vitamin A that’s found in carrots isn’t just limited to protecting your eyesight. It’s also beneficial to other parts of the body as well. For instance, vitamin A boosts the immune system and promotes cell growth. It is also necessary for the proper function of your heart, lungs, kidneys and other organs.

The peels of the carrot, which most people discard, is a treasure trove, especially when it comes to antioxidants. In particular, beta-carotene — as well as half of the carrot’s antioxidant contents — is found in the outer layer. These antioxidants prevent oxidation and fight the free radicals in the body, which cause tissue damage and oxidative stress. What’s more, antioxidants like beta-carotene reduce the risk of certain cancers, such as prostate and gastric cancer. In the U.S., the American Cancer Society estimates that over 160,000 cases of prostate cancer and 26,000 cases of stomach cancer will be diagnosed this year alone. It also could lower a person’s risk from coronary heart disease.

Other nutrients found in carrots

More than just vitamin A, carrots are loaded with many other nutrients. They are low in calories, saturated fat, and total fat, but rich in fiber. Fiber promotes healthy digestion and absorption. Soluble fibers help prevent the buildup of cholesterol in your blood vessels, additionally protecting you from high blood pressure and other heart diseases.

Other nutrients found in carrots are potassium, magnesium, vitamins A, E, K and vitamin C, which is also an antioxidant. Carrots also come in a variety of different colors other than orange, such as yellow, red, and purple carrots. These kinds of carrots contain amounts of lutein, lycopene, and anthocyanins, respectively. These nutrients all aid in combating a host of health problems and chronic diseases. (Related: Carrots over cough medicine! Discover why this veggie is a natural solution).

The humble carrot is truly a versatile vegetable. They complement nearly every meal without having an overpowering flavor. They can be chopped, shredded, steamed or boiled, and then some. Cooked or raw, the possibilities are endless. Even eaten on their own, they make the perfect healthy snack for kids and adults alike. (Natural News).

Stem juice from bananas a potential natural cure for diabetes

by Ellaine Castillo

Bananas (Musa × paradisiaca L.) are some of the most common fruits in the world. Aside from its fruit, other parts of the banana plant, which are usually just thrown away or ignored, also have their own uses. In a study, published in Czech Journal of Food Sciences, they observed that juice extracted from banana stem contains antidiabetic compounds.

Diabetes is a metabolic condition wherein blood sugar levels are above what is considered normal. This is caused either by insufficient insulin production or reduced sensitivity to insulin. Insulin is the hormone responsible for keeping blood sugar levels in check and without its effects, blood sugar will build up.

In past studies, phytochemicals in bananas have been observed for their potential in treating diabetes. Some of the ways through which these phytochemicals work are by inhibiting carbohydrate-digesting enzymes and glucose adsorption, as well as promoting antioxidant activity. However, these phytochemicals have not been studied and developed into phytomedicines or products that possess antidiabetic activity. In addition to this, not all bananas are the same. This means that these phytochemicals and their corresponding bioactivities might not be present in all bananas. These variations can be attributed to factors, such as environmental conditions.

For this study, the researchers determined the effect of environmental conditions on antidiabetic compounds found in stem juice extracted from bananas planted either in Vietnam or a greenhouse in the Czech Republic. They performed metabolite profiling and discovered that there were variations in the compounds in the samples. It was observed that stem juice from bananas grown in the greenhouse only had nine out of the 17 compounds that were screened for, while stem juice from bananas grown in Vietnam had 12.

In addition to this, antidiabetic activity was also determined based on the inhibitory effect on alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase, which are carbohydrate-digesting enzymes, as well as their ability to inhibit cells from turning into adipocytes. Researchers observed that stem juice from both sources had the same level of inhibition for alpha-glucosidase. This inhibitory activity was also shown to follow a dose-dependent manner. Meanwhile, there was no significant inhibition of alpha-amylase for both samples, although stem juice from the bananas grown in Vietnam did have a slightly higher level of inhibition. Lastly, the researchers also saw that neither of the samples was able to prevent cells from turning into adipocytes.

The results of this study show that juice from the banana stem, which is typically considered waste, contains phytochemicals that exhibit antidiabetic potential. Although environmental conditions affect the phytochemicals that are present, the level of alpha-amylase inhibition remains constant regardless of where the banana was planted. These results show that bananas can also serve as a natural source for potential diabetes treatments, reducing the need for harmful antidiabetic drugs in the future. (Natural News).

How vitamin D supports brain health and works to reduce depression risk

by Vicki Batts

Recent research has shown that vitamin D supports overall brain health, and that this vital nutrient can even help relieve depression. Estimates suggest that at least one billion people struggle with vitamin D deficiency worldwide, and another 350 million suffer with depression. While it may not be a cure-all, ensuring that you are getting enough vitamin D can help take the edge off of a depressed mind — and can help support better overall health, too.

Multiple studies have shown that there is a direct link between vitamin D deficiency and depression, but vitamin D is needed for much more than that. The “sunshine vitamin,” like other nutrients, plays multiple roles in the human body. For example, vitamin D is essential for healthy bones, as well as a healthy brain.

Understanding vitamin D and depression

As Be Brain Fit reports, ensuring your brain is healthy is the “first line of defense” when it comes to keeping depression at bay. Vitamin D is essential for brain health across the lifespan. It’s essential for proper brain development in the womb and early childhood, and it helps keep your brain healthy as you age by fending off cognitive decline. The benefits of vitamin D can be felt regardless of age.

In seniors, the benefits of vitamin D are especially notable. As sources explain, vitamin D deficiency in older adults is linked to multiple brain disorders including depression, dementia, borderline disorder and schizophrenia.

Conversely, studies have shown that supplementing with vitamin D can boost mood, improve memory and support overall brain function.

How vitamin D works in relationship to depression is not yet fully understood but researchers know that it helps. As a study published in 2017 concluded:

“Clearly, eating food that is rich of vitamin D, taking dietary supplements to improve vitamin D deficiency, and spending time in the sunshine and/ or exercising outdoors may improve mental well-being in patients with depression. Although several issues in the relationship between depression and low levels of vitamin D remain controversial and are in need of further studies, the literature is already providing enough data to recommend screening for and treating vitamin D deficiency in subjects with depression, which is easy, cost-effective and may improve depression outcomes.”

In their research, the study authors note that treating depression with vitamin D supplementation can take time and that it’s not an instantaneous remedy. The team also notes that there are many factors which can contribute to depression beyond just vitamin D deficiency.

Be Brain Fit reports that while the mechanisms by which vitamin D works to fight depression are not yet confirmed, it is believed that vitamin D increases production of brain chemicals called monoamines. Monoamines include “feel-good” neurotransmitters like serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine.

Science has also shown that vitamin D deficiency may also promote inflammation in the brain –leading some to posit that perhaps inflammation is the true cause of depression.

More about vitamin D

In the United States, it’s estimated that 42 percent of people don’t get enough vitamin D. The daily recommended intake of vitamin D is 400 to 800 IU (International Units), but some research indicates that vitamin D needs may be much higher than that — especially for people who aren’t regularly exposed to sunlight.

Experts say that blood levels of vitamin D should be between 20 and 30 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL).

There are a few ways in which one can get vitamin D. Sun exposure is a great way to get your vitamin D, but it can be an unreliable source due to differences in sunlight across seasons and time of day, as well as differences in absorption from person to person. Foods that contain vitamin D include fatty fish like salmon, mackerel and sardines, along with pastured eggs, mushrooms and yogurt.

Vitamin D supplements are a great option to help ensure you’re getting enough, but you should always speak with a naturopath or other trusted holistic care professional before beginning a new supplement. (Natural News).

Why you should reject all those low-fat eating plans

by Gary Harvey

I love this subject.

You know why?

Because for too long we’ve relied on health officials — and they get things wrong. And many times they’re slow to admit it.

It’s time “we the people” were more informed about health matters and stopped relying blindly on what the doctor or some other presumed expert tells us. It’s time we took responsibility for our own health decisions.

And that’s what this article is inviting you to do. As well as that, I’m sharing some vital information that reverses the WRONG advice these health managers have been giving us for decades.

WHEN THE TROUBLE STARTED

This low-fat gospel started to become mainstream dogma back in 1977.

After that, a whole slew of health problems proliferated around the world, especially in the affluent West. These problems include “The Obesity Epidemic” and “The worldwide diabetes epidemic.” Yes, that’s exactly how the NIH website describes the plight we’re now in. (For our non-American readers, NIH is the US government’s National Institutes of Health).

Healthline.com has a stunning graph that shows that the obesity rate started to climb from 1977, and it hasn’t stopped yet.

One of the most important recent studies that upset the low-fat apple cart was reported in The Lancet, a prestigious British medical journal. The report said, “Diet is one of the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease[…] and current guidelines recommend a low-fat diet.” This report on the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study goes on to recommend those guidelines be changed.

Yep, that low-fat diet was a big fat problem. It helped produce the present set of human health tragedies.

And it’s hard to knock this study. It assessed a decade of eating patterns by 135,335 people from 18 countries. They were looking for any connections between carbs and fats on the one hand and heart disease and death on the other.

CONCLUSIONS?

In plain language (mine!), they found:

Eat more fat – and live longer.

Eat more carbs – and die sooner.

Or as The Telegraph put it in the UK, “Low-fat diet could kill you.”

The study found that it doesn’t make any difference if it’s saturated fat or unsaturated fat. You need both, my friend… as well as fruit and veggies every day.

The British food guidelines are very clear about this. They say that processed foods that are labeled as low-fat, lite or low-cholesterol “should be avoided.”

One more reason: Low-fat food tends to taste bland, so manufacturers add sugar, HFCS (corn syrup), and salt to pep up the flavor so consumers will buy their stuff. All that salt and sugar is bad for you.

So… I’m done with low-fat yogurt, skim milk, low-fat cheese and the like because eating fat doesn’t make you fat. It may in fact save your life.

Just don’t go overboard. Your best choice is a balanced diet, with about one third of your energy coming from foods with healthy fat like meat and dairy. And make sure you eat around 4 serves per day of fruit and veggies (including legumes).
***
Question: Which fats are good? The unsaturated ones like vegetable oils (olive, sesame, sunflower, but NOT palm oil), nuts (almonds, cashews, peanuts, pecans, walnuts), seeds (flaxseed, sunflower, pumpkin, sesame), oily fish (salmon, herring, sardines, trout), and avocado. As well as those unsaturated fats, here are some healthy saturated fats: coconut products, carob, Brazil nuts, peanut butter.

Question: What about trans fat? Bad, even dangerous. So read the ingredients list on the back of the pack, not just the “no trans fats” advertising on the front. Labeling laws permit manufacturers to round down.

Question: What’s the difference between unsaturated fat and saturated fat? A simple yardstick that gets it right most of the time is that one type stays liquid at room temperature (the unsaturated fats, such as olive oil). The other type doesn’t. For example, beef and cheese.

Question: What about sausages, salamis and processed meats? No good. It’s all the additives. (Natural News).

Louisiana’s undocumented seafood workers unite to fight workplace abuses

by Mike Elk

In the bayous of Louisiana, fear is running high for the thousands of guest workers that staff the state’s $2bn a year seafood industry.

Seafood work is so dangerous that workers often lose fingers and suffer debilitating carpal tunnel injuries on the industry’s high-speed assembly lines. Many Latinas working in the industry endure sexual harassment at the hand of white southerners.

“They stay quiet about [the harassment] because they know that the owner won’t bring them back if they speak up,” says Julia, who wished to use only her first name.

Worse, many recently-arrived guest workers find themselves in rural isolated parts of Louisiana where fear of law enforcement is compounded by the belief that police brutality against undocumented workers is commonplace. In many rural municipalities, the owners of large seafood processing companies often know the police on a personal level and workers live with the fear of owners calling the police to have them deported if they cause trouble.

In 2012, when the National Guestworker Alliance tried to organize seafood workers, the owner of crawfish supplier CJ’s Seafood even threatened workers with violence if they spoke up about poor conditions including sometimes locking workers in the plant and forcing them to work 24 hours straight to meet demand.

Now seafood workers in Louisiana are beginning to lose that fear as they organize under the banner of the Seafood Workers Alliance. “The company has all the power, but with organizing, we are going to attack their power,” said Jesus Andres, president of the Seafood Workers Alliance.

At a recent meeting of workers, Andres quickly slathered a thick coat of mayonnaise on a tortilla with fried shrimp and habanero sauce as he rushed to take his seat at the head of a table where three dozen seafood worker gathered in the community room of the Lafayette public library.

All of a sudden, 34-year-old Danilo Balladares, an organizer with the Seafood Workers Alliance, stood in front of the room and began to clap. Soon, the rest of the room, black, white and brown alike, joined in the clapping. Gradually the clap got louder and more upbeat as cries of “rrrrrr” broke out. Balladares stopped the clapping and called the meeting to attention.

“All the people here could be fired,” said Balladares, pointing to Andres and the leaders of Seafood Workers Alliance seated at the front of the room. “They could be fired and sent back to their country if their employer knew they were here.”

Formed in 2017 as an offshoot of organizing being done by the National Guestworker Alliance and the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice the Seafood Workers Alliance has hundreds of members in 15 different plants throughout Louisiana.

The organization has focused heavily on suing employers and building alliances with local communities so that workers can help push back when they face abuses in the workplace. They’ve built deep ties in particular with the African American community. Often, low wage employers have attempted to pit low wage African American workers against Latino workers, who many saw as coming to Louisiana to take their jobs.

Through combined struggle, the workers have learned that, while their struggles are different, their problems both with local employers and enforcement are similar.

“Look, we understand now that when they say deportation that’s incarceration for black people,” said Alfred Marshall, a middle-aged African American activist with Stand with Dignity, also a project of the New Orleans Workers Center for Racial Justice.

“When they say undocumented, we know that there are over 50,000-60,000 people in New Orleans who have outstanding warrants on them that can’t even go get a job because of the fear they have,” said Marshall.

“The language they use is different, but the problems are the same and now we understand that better than ever.”

As a result of the growing solidarity and power of the Seafood Workers Alliance, the workers have been able to win the reinstatement of over a dozen workers who feared they would be blacklisted; creating a sense of momentum. In March, the union successfully won the reinstatement of seven workers at D & G Frey Crawfish in Iota, Louisiana.

At the catfish plant in Guidry’s Catfish in Breaux Bridge, Louisiana, many were fearful that Andres would not be allowed to come back for another season after he laid out a campaign to raise wages at the plant from $9 an hour to $12 an hour.

However, in March, Andres and his co-workers organized and forced their employer to agree to bring him back. This win, on the heels of winning other reinstatements, has given workers a new sense of power. Andres says that now he sees more and more of his co-workers overcoming their fears and putting pressure on the boss to improve their workplace.

“Through the Seafood Workers Alliance, we have learned how to assert our rights and take on the boss and its changed so much,” said Andres. (The Guardian).