Sunday, September 1, 2024
Home Blog Page 139

There is not much to celebrate for Native Americans on Thanksgiving

EDITOR’S NOTE

 

Dear readers

 

For updating purposes, this article will come out one day after Thanksgiving, so I say I hope you had a wonderful family reunion in the middle of a delicious dinner in peace and love. This article, written by David J. Silverman, describes what history has forgotten to emphasize about this holiday. I hope you enjoy it. – Marvin Ramírez.

 

The mythical harmony of the First Thanksgiving taught in school is the most obvious offense against history. After that, it just gets worse

 

by David J. Silverman

 

While I have been researching and writing a Wampanoag-centered history of Plymouth Colony and the Thanksgiving holiday, my conversations with Native people have opened my eyes to some profound lessons about their past and present. These teachings have particular resonance this Thanksgiving season as the United States continues to struggle with white nationalism, the importance of distinguishing between truth and lies in democratic debate, and the place of indigenous people in a pluralistic country with a colonial foundation.

Native people widely agree that the U.S. has yet to reckon with its history of white violence against their people. Instead, the country uses the myth of the First Thanksgiving to make it appear that Indians consented bloodlessly to colonialism.

That myth, reinforced over and over again through grade school Thanksgiving pageants, holiday decorations, and television specials, is the only cameo Indians make in the colonial history curriculum in many American schools. Unfortunately, it is terrible history and even worse civics.

The myth tells that supposedly friendly Indians (rarely identified by tribe) voluntarily gifted their country to the Pilgrims in order to lay the foundations for a white, Christian, democratic United States. As for why these Indians were so welcoming in the first place, this myth has nothing to say. It does not address the fact that the Wampanoags had already experienced years of slave raiding by European sailors before the appearance of the Mayflower, and that those contacts had introduced them to a devastating plague that more than halved their population and left them vulnerable to their inter-tribal enemies. Thus, when the Pilgrims arrived, the Wampanoags looked to them for a military alliance despite their wariness of English treachery.

The Thanksgiving Myth also evades the fact that the celebrated peace between the Wampanoags and Plymouth was rife with tensions from the start and ultimately degenerated into a bloody war. During the celebrated 50 years of peace following the First Thanksgiving, the Wampanoags complained endlessly about the English encroaching on their land, undermining their political systems, and asserting their jurisdiction over purely Indian affairs.

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/11/151121-first-thanksgiving-pilgrims-native-americans-wampanoag-saints-and-strangers/

Not coincidentally, there were recurrent war scares during these years as Native leaders reached across tribal lines to make common cause against their common colonial threat. The tension finally broke in King Philip’s War of 1675-76, which led to the deaths of thousands of Wampanoag, Narragansett, Nipmuc, and other indigenous people, and the enslavement of thousands more. The Thanksgiving Myth ignores this consequence of the Pilgrim-Wampanoag alliance, though clashes of this sort were a basic feature of American colonial history.

Some American history courses might teach about King Philip’s War, but few have anything to say about how many Wampanoags and other Native New Englanders survived after their military subjugation. Over the following centuries, they endured white society’s reduction of them and their children to indentured servitude and the ongoing occupation of their lands. They also suffered white people denying they were Indians at all based on the intermarriages and cultural adjustments they had made to survive under white domination. In other words, Americans are rarely taught the incredible achievement that American Indians are still here, every bit as much a part of the modern world as everyone else.

Indigenous people also widely bemoan that Americans’ lack of historical understanding about the Native American contributes to a marked lack of recognition of their place in the country, a general lack of compassion for their historic struggles, and widespread unawareness about their ongoing fights for sovereignty and cultural self-determination. Indeed, many of them feel invisible to the general public.

Lest we diminish the impact of these messages, consider the experience of a young Wampanoag woman who told me that when she was in kindergarten, the lone Indian in her class, her teacher cast her as Chief Massasoit in a Thanksgiving pageant and had her sing with her classmates “This Land is Your Land, This Land is My Land.” Reflecting on the moment as an adult, the cruel irony was not lost on her. As a child, she only knew enough to be embarrassed about it.

Not least of all, the widespread belief that modern Indians cannot be authentic and have no legitimate historic rights has contributed to a recent decision by Trump’s Department of the Interior to revoke a 2007 federal ruling that restored reservation lands to the Mashpee Wampanoags of Cape Cod, descendants of the very people who welcomed the Pilgrims.

No wonder, then, that many Native people, including the Wampanoags, charge that their fellow Americans lack sufficient gratitude for what they’ve sacrificed for the country. This feeling of victimhood is especially poignant given that many Native communities still suffer extraordinarily high levels of poverty, with all of its associated ills, while living in the shadow of sometimes garish wealth. Wampanoag people in southeastern New England, for instance, are confronted daily with the sight of outsiders’ extravagant coastal estates, occupied for only six or eight weeks in summer, built atop places where the ancestors are buried and where some of them fished, hunted, and gathered within memory. The image sickens and depresses. And yet there is no escaping it or the sense that other Americans revel in it.

In Thanksgiving season, one cannot drive past neighbors’ lawns or go to the store without confronting happy Pilgrim and Indian decorations, or turn on the television, radio, or computer without being bombarded with Pilgrim and Indian themes. Some schools continue to have children, including Native children, perform Thanksgiving pageants. For these reasons and more, the United New England Indians have held a National Day of Mourning in Plymouth every Thanksgiving Day since 1970, which is attended by indigenous people from throughout the hemisphere. They do not see American colonialism as something to celebrate.

Part of what I’ve learned through my conversations with Wampanoag people is that achieving some measure of repair and signaling that Americans value their Native countrymen and women requires compassion, gratitude, and a willingness to confront uncomfortable history. Taking these steps might also help us, collectively, to restore basic dignity, intelligence, and humanity to our civic culture.

If you’re at risk of diabetes, you should start pumping iron

by Melissa Smith

 

People often practice strength training or resistance training exercises to build muscle and achieve their dream figure. But strength training can benefit the body in more ways: A study published in the journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings suggested that this type of exercise can be beneficial for reducing the risk of Type 2 diabetes.

In the study, researchers from Iowa State University found that adults with moderate muscle strength were 32 percent less likely to develop Type 2 diabetes. They reached this finding after studying 4,681 people who did not have Type 2 diabetes. To measure the participants’ fitness and muscle strength levels, the researchers asked them to carry out a series of fitness tests, which included leg and bench presses as well as using the treadmill.

During an average follow-up of eight years, the researchers revisited the participants and found that five percent developed Type 2 diabetes. Moderate muscle mass cut the risk for Type 2 diabetes by 32 percent, irrespective of previous fitness levels, smoking, drinking, obesity and high blood pressure.

“Performing even a small amount of resistance training, which is a main contributor to muscular strength, may provide big benefits,” suggested Dr. Angelique Brellenthin, one of the researchers of the study.

The researchers noted that although their findings suggested that moderate strength can be beneficial, they weren’t able to tell exactly how much training people need to do to reduce their risk of Type 2 diabetes. They also wrote that one limitation of the study is that the participants were not asked to report their diet, which is one of the most important risk factors for Type 2 diabetes.

Brellenthin recommended bodyweight squats, lunges, pushups, and planks for beginners.

How strength training helps

Strength training helps reduce the risk of diabetes – not by eliminating the need for insulin but providing a way for the body to burn glucose for fuel without producing much more of it. When you use larger muscles during resistance training, you allow glucose to enter muscle cells, where it will be used for fuel, without the need for additional insulin.

“When you’re performing resistance training, you’re tearing muscle fibers apart,” Christel Oerum, a co-founder of Diabetes Strong who lives with Type 1 diabetes, told Healthline.com.

Oerum explained that those muscle fibers have to be rebuilt to become stronger, a process that requires more energy. For this reason, more glucose and calories are burned after you exercise. She also emphasized that exercise itself and the gradual building of healthy muscles provide the greatest benefits.

Strength training also helps protect against diabetes by increasing the ability of your muscles to store glucose. This increases with your strength, which helps your body regulate blood sugar levels better. In addition, your body’s fat-to-muscle ratio declines with strength training. As a result, the amount of insulin you need in your body to help store energy in fat cells also decreases.

You also don’t have to worry about getting too bulky. You only need to get your muscles stronger and not bigger. Getting bulk muscles also does not come too quickly as it requires significant intention, well-structured training programs, and proper nutrition.

The American Diabetes Association suggests the following guidelines for a strength training routine:

  • Perform strength training two or three days each week, with at least a day off between session to let muscles rest and rebuild.
  • Do at least eight to 10 weight exercises per session to work all the main muscle groups of the upper and lower body.
  • Your workout should last 20 to 60 minutes per session.

Researchers continue to find ways to fight diabetes as the number of people with this condition continues to increase. Learn more on how to protect yourself against this chronic condition at PreventDiabetes.news.

Sources include:

Diabetes.co.uk

Healthline.com

EverydayHealth.com

 

The future of Dreamers –and of one lawyer who represents them- is in the hands of the Supreme Court

Despite news reports about a potential setback by SCOTUS, experts are optimistic about the chances of DACA recipients to remain in the U.S. in the long term

 

by Pilar Marrero

 

Among the lawyers representing almost 800,000 DACA recipients in front of the Supreme Court was Ted Olson, a veteran who has argued in front of the high court so many times that even the janitorial staff and the elevator operator greeted him by name that day. Accompanying Olsen was Dreamer Luis Cortes, 31, also a lawyer.

“As we walked into the building, you could feel the gravity of the place,” Cortes said in an interview. “This is the same space that has changed history, from desegregation to woman´s rights and so many other things. Olson has argued there 65 times. It was my first time even being inside.”

As they settled in their seats inside of the hearing room, Olson introduced Cortes to the man who would argue against their case: Noel Francisco, solicitor general of the United States, representing the Trump Administration against DACA.

“Olson made sure to tell Francisco that I was co-counsel and that I was one of the DACA recipients they would argue about,” said Cortes. “We shook hands and he said something like ‘great,’ then moved away. He might have been a bit uncomfortable after that.”

The questions don’t predict the outcome

After the arguments were over that day, various experts started to predict how the justices may vote based on their questions. Several media stories anticipated a negative result for DACA, particularly because of questions from Chief Justice, John Roberts, who is expected to be the tie-breaking vote in a court that often rules 5-4.

Neither Cortes nor other experts interviewed for this story feel that way, insisting that justices’ questions cannot predict their vote.

Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), referred to similar news analyses that ran after the arguments were presented to SCOTUS regarding adding the citizenship question to the 2020 U.S Census by the Trump administration.

“Let me remind everyone that seven months ago, they all decided we were going to lose on the citizenship questions because of what Roberts said in the hearing,” Saenz said. “I don´t put a lot of stock on that assessment. Justices, in particular Roberts as it appears from recent history, do consider carefully the implications of a decision. And the implications here are huge.”

Roberts, a conservative, sided in June with the four liberal justices to rule against allowing the Trump administration to add the citizenship question to the 2020 Census, a result no one had predicted a few months ago. Some are banking on a similar surprise from Roberts this time, but no one can really tell what´s going to happen.

After the Nov. 12 DACA hearing, Cortes and Olson left the room optimistic about the results, Cortes said.

“A lot of the time justices use the questions or a conversation for one of the other justices,” he said. “We left very optimistic –we had the best answer with every question that was asked and left everything on the table.”

The possible results for Dreamers

The DACA program, a deferred-action decision allowing temporary legal status to hundreds of thousands of immigrants who arrived in the U.S. as children, was put in place by former President Barack Obama in 2012. In 2017, the Trump administration announced it would phase out the program, alleging that it was illegal from the very beginning.

Several lawsuits argued that Trump´s planned termination of DACA violates federal law requiring certain procedures before major rules are changed, as well as equal protection and due process guarantees.

Federal courts issued nationwide injunctions, blocking the administration´s plans to end DACA and forcing the continuation of program renewals. SCOTUS took the unusual step of taking up the cases before lower courts had fully heard them.

SCOTUS could rule at any time before next June, and it would all fall in the middle of a presidential election year, a fact that could affect the President´s mind and political calculations, said Frank Sharry, a veteran Washington observer and executive director of America´s Voice, a pro-immigration reform group.

Sharry believes Trump is less likely to move on terminating DACA if the court says it should be done differently.

“If the court says the Trump administration did have the authority to terminate but that it did it in the wrong manner, then there´s a chance he won´t do it at all,” Sharry says.

“I think Trump understands the backlash, because it was big after the revocation was announced in 2017,” Sharry added. “He may try to get away with saying that he will take care of it after the election and keep his base happy that they won and at the same time not completely alienate moderates who support the program. But he doesn´t know if he will be there after the election.”

For Nico Espiritu, a lawyer with the National Immigration Law Center (NILC), a ruling like that from SCOTUS would give Dreamers more time to stay in the country.

“If it´s sent back to the lower courts saying it wasn’t done right, SCOTUS will have to issue another rule to wind down the program,” said Espiritu. “This would allow those still receiving DACA to continue to stay and be authorized to work and protected from deportation.”

Sharry added that Dreamers can apply for an extra two years even if their current DACA has not expired. “There will be a major push for them to do it as soon as possible,” he said.

If SCOTUS rules that the Trump administration did everything right and DACA is allowed to expire, DACA recipients are likely to be allowed to finish their current period in the program and then be put on deportation, but they could still fight it individually, said Saenz. These individual deportations in backlogged immigration courts could take a long time.

In that case, a future new president could restart the program again, issuing another rule, or a new Congress could take up the Dream Act. If Trump remains president, all bets are off, however.

Bill Hing, law professor at the University of San Francisco, expects major protests and mobilizations by the Dreamers, the best organized immigrant group in the country, if DACA is allowed to expire by the SCOTUS decision.

“I think we would see some of the biggest protests in the movement so far,” he said. “They have a lot of support.”

For Dreamer-lawyer Luis Cortes, who practices immigration law, the future lives of his clients are at stake, as well as his own.

“I worry about my clients, but my future is tied up with theirs,” Cortes says. “One of the reasons I was fighting this case is to prevent my clients from being deported, and me with them.”

 

Trump says drug cartels will be designated terrorist organizations

Mexico will seek high-level meeting with US to discuss the designation

 

by Mexico News Daily

 

The United States will designate Mexican drug cartels as terrorist organizations, U.S. President Donald Trump said in an interview Tuesday, triggering a request by Mexico for high-level bilateral talks.

“They will be designated… I have been working on that for the last 90 days” Trump told political commentator Bill O’Reilly.

“We’re losing 100,000 people a year to… what’s coming through Mexico,” Trump said, referring to narcotics trafficking. “They [the cartels] have unlimited money… it’s drug money and human trafficking money…”

Trump’s remarks prompted a swift response from the Secretariat of Foreign Affairs (SRE).

“The foreign secretary [Marcelo Ebrard] will establish contact with his counterpart, Michael R. Pompeo, in order to discuss this very important issue for the bilateral agenda,” the SRE said in a statement.

“In accordance with the good relations… between both countries, the Mexican government will seek a high-level meeting as soon as possible to present Mexico’s position and understand the point of view of United States authorities.”

Ebrard said Tuesday that he believed designating cartels as terrorists was unnecessary and stressed that Mexico will not allow a United States intervention in Mexico, an assertion repeated by President López Obrador on Wednesday.

He said he did not wish to start an argument on the eve of the Thanksgiving holiday in the U.S. so his message to Donald Trump was a brief one: “Cooperation yes, interventionism no. And that’s where we shall leave it.”

López Obrador also offered hugs to U.S. citizens in celebration of the holiday.

Trump’s affirmation that the terrorist designation will be made came two days after the LeBarón family, who lost nine members in a suspected cartel ambush this month, posted a petition to a White House website that calls on the United States government to do exactly that.

But conservative U.S. lawmakers have been urging the Trump administration to classify cartels as terrorists since early this year.

Two Republican party representatives called for the move in a February letter to Secretary of State Pompeo, and soon after Trump endorsed the idea, telling the news website Breitbart, “we’re thinking about doing it very seriously… Mexico, unfortunately, has lost control of the cartels.”

Once a group is designated as a terrorist organization, it is illegal under U.S. law for people to knowingly offer support. Members of the organization are barred from entering the United States and those already in the country face deportation.

Financial institutions that become aware they have funds linked to a terrorist group must block the money and notify the U.S. Treasury Department.

Some of the implications of the designation were aired by Mexican columnist León Krauze in The Washington Post last week. He wrote that a terrorist designation of Mexican cartels “would greatly complicate an already strained bilateral agenda.”

He said “the U.S. government would be immediately granted a set of blunt diplomatic instruments that could have unforeseen consequences for both countries.” He noted that U.S. intelligence capabilities and the government’s ability to antagonize people suspected of assisting cartels would both increase.

“…While the situation in Mexico is undeniably difficult, the designation of some of the country’s cartels as terrorist organizations seems disproportionate and counterproductive,” Krauze wrote.

Arturo Sarukhán, a former Mexican ambassador to the United States, told Milenio TV that a designation could have “very broad and brutal political, diplomatic, financial, economic and commercial consequences.”

The move would reinforce “this narrative of Mexico as a threat to the national security of the United States,” he said.

The editor of the newspaper El Economista argued that the planned designation is politically motivated, writing in an opinion piece that “the president knows that attacking Mexico can offer him a high return from his electoral base.”

Luis Miguel González contended that the move would further complicate U.S. ratification of the new North American trade agreement and could cause the bilateral relationship to plummet to “new lows.”

He predicted that the U.S. president will increasingly use Mexico as a punching bag as the 2020 presidential election draws closer.

“…Will Trump take the Mexican piñata out of the garage? You can bet that he will. Perhaps he won’t dare to break it because of the high risk that implies…” González wrote.

“[But] maybe he will because he likes strong emotions, because he’s a supporter of protectionism more than free trade and… because he doesn’t like Mexico. It’s as simple as that.”

Source: Milenio (sp), Reuters (en), El Economista (sp), The Washington Post (en).

15th Central American Mothers Caravan arrives in Mexico City

by the El Reportero’s wire services

 

The 15th Caravan of Central American Mothers in Search of Missing Migrants arrived in Mexico City and will remain in this capital for three days, the National Migration Institute (INM) confirmed on Thursday.

The agency informed in a press release that the Caravan is carried out through the Grupo Beta, which provides support and monitoring during its transit through different states of Mexico.

It adds that the Caravan began its tour on Nov. 15 in the municipality of Ciudad Hidalgo, Chiapas, and arrived yesterday in this capital, where its members will remain for three days before heading to Puebla. The tour will conclude on Dec. 3 in Tabasco.

During this period, Grupo Beta agents have been attentive to the passage of the Caravan through different parts of the country, such as Chiapas, Veracruz, Nuevo Leon, Querétaro, San Luis Potosi, Coahuila, Aguascalientes, Guanajuato and Michoacán.

As part of the accompaniment and follow-up efforts, the press release adds, Grupo Beta has the task of providing – where necessary – first aid and social assistance to the women and men of the Caravan, made up of about 50 people from different Central American nations, including El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua.

 

More immigrants without criminal records detained in US

The number of foreigners without criminal records who have been detained by US immigration authorities has tripled over the past four years, according to a study published here.

The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a research center attached to the University of Syracuse, in New York, said that 32,000 people without criminal records had been detained until April 2019.

On the other hand, in January 2015, the number of detained immigrants reached nearly 10,000, according to the study, accounting for 64 percent

of those arrested by agents of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The research shows that the two detention centers with more immigrants without criminal records are in the state of Texas, one of which is on the border with Mexico.

 

US, Canada and Mexico discuss trade deal

Delegations from the United States, Canada and Mexico are meeting here on Wednesday to discuss their trade agreement signed a year ago and pending for ratification by the legislatures in Washington and Ottawa, local media reported.

According to the Politico newspaper, the meeting is being attended by US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, and Mexican Deputy Foreign Minister for North America Jesus Seade.

Signed on Nov. 30, 2018, in Argentina, the deal replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA, 1994), after intense negotiations under pressure from US President Donald Trump.

 

Mexican president rejects US intervention

“Cooperation yes, intervention no,” was the response this Wednesday from Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador to statements by his US counterpart, Donald Trump, who defined Mexican drug cartels as terrorist groups.

Asked about it in his morning press conference at the National Palace, the president evaded the issue and refused to go into details about it, but immediately clarified, in order to avoid any doubts regarding whether the issue was being addressed, that the Foreign Ministry issued a statement on the matter yesterday, which insisted that Mexico’s position is to cooperate, but without foreign intervention.

He reiterated that the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Marcelo Ebrard, has instructions to deal with this matter and will inform of the results when he considers it necessary, today or tomorrow.

A few hours before the conference, Ebrard had reaffirmed on social networks that Mexico will never accept actions that violate its national sovereignty.

He added that “the government of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador will act firmly.”

He indicated this position was transmitted to the United States, as well as Mexico’s resolve to confront transnational organized crime. “Mutual respect is the basis of cooperation,” he stressed.

 

Notice of Election in Foster City

THIS IS TO NOTIFY that an election will be held
by revocation of mandate in the City of Foster City on Tuesday 3 of
March 2020, for the following:

Should Herb Pérez be removed (removed) from office
of the City Councilor of Foster City? Yes or No

If the majority of the votes in a recall proposal are “Yes,” the
officer is removed and, if there is a candidate, the candidate who receives the greatest
number of votes is the successor of the remaining period of the dismissed officer.

All registered voters will be sent a ballot by
mail. Voting centers will be open throughout the County of
San Mateo from 29 days before the elections. The polls will be
open between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p. m. Election Day.

The nomination period for replacement candidates begins on
November 12 and ends at 5:00 p. m. from December 19.

Contact the city secretary at 650-286-3253 to get
more information.

Priscilla Schaus, secretary of the city

Date: November 5, 2019
Published: November 15, 2019 – El Reportero CNS3312565

NOTICE OF THE ELECTORAL OFFICIAL OF THE ELECTIONS OF THE HOUR AND THE PLACE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION, SEATS, FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY AND DISTRICT SPECIAL, AND PARTY CENTRAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNTY FOR WHICH WILL BE APPOINTED TO QUALIFIED CANDIDATES

THROUGH THIS PRESENT, IT IS NOTIFIED that a Presidential Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

THROUGH THE PRESENT ALL QUALIFIED PEOPLE  ARE NOTIFIED that elections will be held in San Mateo County, State of California, with the purpose of electing members to the Federal, State, County and Special District Seats indicated below:

Federal and State Seats:

President and Vice President: 4-year period beginning January 20, 2021

Representative of the United States in Congress, Districts 14 and 18: 2-year period beginning January 3, 2021

State Senate, Districts 11 and 13: 4-year period beginning December 7, 2020

State Assembly, Districts 19, 22 and 24: 2-year period beginning December 7, 2020

Nonpartisan County Seats:

Superior Court Judge: 10 seats available; 6-year period beginning January 4, 2021

Board of Supervisors, Districts 1, 4 and 5: 4-year period beginning January 4, 2021

Special Districts:

East Palo Alto Sanitary District: 3 seats; 4 year period

Central Partisan County Committees

Democrat, Green, Peace and Freedom, and Republican

Please call the San Mateo County Registration and Elections Division at (650) 312-5238 for more information on the number of seats available.

The qualifications for the positions of Member, Board of Directors as set forth in the district’s principal record require that the candidate be a registered voter of the district, who is not disqualified by the Constitution or laws of the state from occupying a civil office and all other specifications contained in the main district record.

Candidate statements and nomination documents for eligible candidates who wish to run for any of the elective offices can be obtained from the Registration and Elections Division, 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, 650.312.5222, effective November 11, 2019, and must be submitted before 5:00 pm from December 6, 2019. If an eligible office holder does not present the nomination documents before the established date and time, voters will have until 5:00 p.m. from December 11, 2019 to nominate candidates who are not the holder for such position.

Appointment for each elective office will be made by the supervisory authority as established by the Elections Code, Section 10515 in the event that there is no candidate or an insufficient number of candidates for such office and that a petition has not been filed for a election in the time established by law, which is 5:00 pm from November 11, 2019.

I ALSO PROMOTE that in such election the constitutional amendments, questions, proposals and proposed initiatives of law that the Constitution and the laws of this State require to be submitted shall be submitted to the vote of the electors.

FURTHER NOTIFY that in such election the polling places will be open between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Election Day

FURTHER NOTIFY that the Voting Ballots by Mail, Voting Ballots of Voting Centers and the Provisional Ballots marked for the Election held on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, will be counted at the place indicated at continuation:

San Mateo County Registration and Elections Division

40 Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402

Dated: November 15, 2019

/ f / Mark Church

Chief Election Officer and County Assessor-Secretary-Registrar

CNS-3298518 #

Board of Supervisors, Districts 1, 4 and 5: 4-year period beginning January 4, 2021

NOTICE OF THE CHOICE OFFICIAL OF THE ELECTIONS OF THE HOUR AND THE PLACE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION, SEATS

FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY AND DISTRICT

SPECIAL, AND PARTY CENTRAL COMMITTEES OF THE COUNTY FOR WHICH WILL BE APPOINTED TO QUALIFIED CANDIDATES

 

THROUGH THIS PRESENT, it is NOTIFIED that a Presidential Primary Election will be held on Tuesday, March 3, 2020.

THROUGH THE PRESENT ALL PEOPLE ARE NOTIFIED

QUALIFIED that elections will be held in San Mateo County, State of California, with the purpose of electing members to the Federal, State, County and Special District Seats indicated below:

Federal and State Seats:

President and Vice President: 4-year period beginning January 20, 2021

Representative of the United States in Congress, Districts 14 and 18: 2-year period beginning January 3, 2021

State Senate, Districts 11 and 13: 4-year period beginning December 7, 2020

State Assembly, Districts 19, 22 and 24: 2-year period beginning December 7, 2020

Nonpartisan County Seats:

Superior Court Judge: 10 seats available; 6-year period beginning January 4, 2021

Special Districts:

East Palo Alto Sanitary District: 3 seats; 4 year period

Central Partisan County Committees

Democrat, Green, Peace and Freedom, and Republican

Please call the San Mateo County Registration and Elections Division at (650) 312-5238 for more information on the number of seats available.

The qualifications for the positions of Member, Board of Directors as set forth in the district’s principal record require that the candidate be a registered voter of the district, who is not disqualified by the Constitution or laws of the state from occupying a civil office and all other specifications contained in the main district record.

Candidate statements and nomination documents for eligible candidates who wish to run for any of the elective offices can be obtained from the Registration and Elections Division, 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, 650.312.5222, effective November 11, 2019, and must be submitted before 5:00 pm from December 6, 2019. If an eligible office holder does not present the nomination documents before the established date and time, voters will have until 5:00 p.m. from December 11, 2019 to nominate candidates who are not the holder for such position.

Appointment for each elective office will be made by the supervisory authority as established by the Elections Code, Section 10515 in the event that there is no candidate or an insufficient number of candidates for such office and that a petition has not been filed for a election in the time established by law, which is 5:00 pm from November 11, 2019.

I ALSO PROMOTE that in such election the constitutional amendments, questions, proposals and proposed initiatives of law that the Constitution and the laws of this State require to be submitted shall be submitted to the vote of the electors.

FURTHER NOTIFY that in such election the polling places will be open between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Election Day

FURTHER NOTIFY that the Voting Ballots by Mail, Voting Ballots of Voting Centers and the Provisional Ballots marked for the Election held on Tuesday, March 3, 2020, will be counted at the place indicated at continuation:

San Mateo County Registration and Elections Division

40 Tower Road San Mateo, CA 94402

Dated: November 15, 2019

/ f / Mark Church

Chief Election Officer and County Assessor-Secretary-Registrar

CNS-3298518 #

Breaking the silence about our stolen sisters

Compiled by the El Reportero’s staff

 

This event is part of our Women’s Building Women Speaker Series where we bring together women leaders and activists whose work may not be getting the attention they deserve (both the women and the issue). This is an evening of conversation to build awareness and inspire action.

We will be “Breaking the Silence” around Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women & Girls, as well as women whose lives were stolen as they migrated from Central America to the United States. We will also update our audience about local government efforts to combat gender-based violence in San Francisco.

The evening includes Native American Music, Ceremony and Art. Our Featured Key Note speaker is:

Thurday, Nov. 14, 6 p.m. – 8:30 p.m., At the Women’s Building, San Francisco, 3543 18th Street, San Francisco.

 

Also at Women’s Building:

Community Planning Continues! Join us to talk about the 2020 ballot and possible measures by the Monster to push their proposal through.

Come be a part of the conversation and help us plan for 2020. See you on the 19th!

Childcare, Interpretation and Dinner provided.

The Women’s Building is ADA accessible and our meeting will be on the ground floor.

Community Meeting – 2020 Ballot, Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019 at 6 – 8 p.m., at the Women’s Building, San Francisco.

The California Institute for Community, Art, and Nature (California I CAN)
invites you to an evening with L. Frank Manríquez (Tongva/Ajachmem)

 

Life after genocide, extinct people can park anywhere

The California Institute for Community, Art, and Nature (California I CAN) invites you to an evening with L. Frank Manriquez (Tongva/Ajachmem), a well-known Native American activist, artist, cartoonist, performer, and humorist. Malcolm Margolin, a longtime friend and admirer, will introduce her.

Program Description: Fasten your seat belts and hang on tightly for a tour of Native California that will utterly amaze you.

 

In Berkeley Public Library, West Branch, 1125 University Avenue (near San Pablo Ave.), Berkeley, 6 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.

 

1st Annual Bay Area Pax Christi memory and repentance for victims of nuclear weapons and attacks

Pax Christi Northern California will sponsor its first annual liturgy of Memory and Repentance for Victims of Nuclear Weapons Attacks and Accidents.  The mass will be held at Sacred Heart Church in Oakland, CA. Fr. Jack Lau, OMI will be the principal presider.

The liturgy is a consequence of several different factors in the evolving position of the Roman Catholic Church’s stance on nuclear weapons.  In the controversial 1983 peace pastoral letter the U.S. Catholic bishops called for the United States to repent for the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

On Saturday, Nov. 23 at 7 p.m., at the Heart Church, Oakland.

 

Ivan and Enzo – Tour “There Is No Way To Have Your Fire”

Ivan & Enzo is a duet formed by two talented musicians, multi-instrumentalist composers and singer-songwriters, who by using their different musical talents, manage to combine different musical sounds and expressions as a result they develop a contemporary harmonic sound of great quality.

The two are from artistic families growing up in environments full of music, dance, and Art.

Over the years they have built legacies as singer-songwriters each in different parts of the world, with a common dream to share their music beyond borders.

They have decided to work together in a collaborative production to fulfill their dream and reach new audiences all over the world.

See you guys there with more of the tour: “No Hay Como Tener Tu Fuego.”

At Las Vegas coming up! On Nov. 23, at 8 p.m., at 1800 Industrial Rd Ste 200A Las Vegas, Nevada.

A Mexican wins the International City of Pupiales Story Contest

by the El Reportero’s news services

 

With Tjher Year of the Pig, a work selected from about 2,000 texts sent from 35 countries in Asia, America and Europe, Ulises Paniagua Olivares won the award.

The jury that formed the Cuban Karla Suárez, the Venezuelan Juan Carlos Méndez Guédez and the Colombian Benhur Sánchez Suárez, writers with important literary work internationally, in addition to the winner selected a group of ten finalists among which include writers from Argentina, Colombia, Uruguay, Chile, Peru, Venezuela and Cuba.

The best writer in Colombia was distinguished by Bogota narrator Jaime Escobar Vásquez and two Nariñenses who obtained regional recognition, puppeteers Robinson Coral Portilla and José Daniel del Castillo.

The event that is organized by the Gabriel García Márquez Foundation, with support from the Ministry of Culture and the Government of Nariño, has a long history and prestige that is consolidated every year at the international level.

The story of the winner, who obtains an economic prize of 6 million pesos, is a text that  addresses the obsession of a person, the product of a state of permanent solitude, a metaphor of the urban world where the slavery of a meaningless work leads to delirium, perhaps forgetting  important values ​​such as affection and love. It is a fantastic and ambiguous story that undoubtedly manages to move readers.

Prior to the verdict ceremony, which was known on Wednesday, Nov. 5, the organization of the contest was directly linked to the Gabriel García Márquez de Aracataca House Museum, Magdalena, whose director, writer Rafael Darío Jiménez gave talks about life and work of the Nobel Prize for Literature in the municipalities of Pasto, Gualmatán and Pupiales, in Nariño.

Interested writers, participants or not, can check the verdict on the website, which is the official site of the contest. From now on the organization announces a new call for the year 2020.

Revitalization planned for unique stained-glass mural and botanical garden

The Cosmovitral Botanical Garden houses an elaborate mural and 400 species of plants

The second most popular tourist attraction in México state after the ancient city of Teotihuacán is seeking to boost visitor numbers by tapping into a segment of the market that is notoriously tricky to crack: millennials.

The Cosmovitral Botanical Garden in the historic center of Toluca features an elaborate stained-glass mural by deceased México state artist Leopoldo Flores that tells the story of man and his relationship with the universe. It is also home to 400 different species of plants.

More than 360,000 visitors have enjoyed the enclosed garden this year, including foreigners from countries such as Japan, Israel and Spain, but director Alejandra Abraham Jarquín would like to see more young people coming through the doors.

 

A Latin American rangoli in India

The culture, nature and history of four Latin American countries (Ecuador, El Salvador, Peru and Paraguay) were exhibited in a huge rangoli, a traditional Indian art form, to highlight friendship on either side of the world.

Sponsored by the embassies of those four nations in New Delhi, the Latin American rangoli showed Peru’s cultural and natural wealth, Ecuador’s biodiversity, with its Galapagos Islands and the Cotopaxi Volcano, El Salvador’s greatness, and Paraguay’s mate, Guarani language and young people.

Rangoli, decorative drawings that Indians create on the floor of their living rooms, patios and streets during their traditional celebrations, such as the recent Diwali or Light Festival, before the beginning of winter, and after harvests, is an ancient tradition that has been passed from generation to generation.

Ambassadors Hector Cueva (Ecuador), Fleming Duarte (Paraguay) and Carlos Polo (Peru), and Salvadorian Business Attaché Daniel Gutierrez described the event as a symbol of friendship.

 

Gerardo Ortiz receives the “Run of the Year” Award

Last night the star of the Mexican Regional Gerardo Ortiz dominated the scene of the twentieth installment of the 2019 Radio Awards.

Gerardo Ortiz was awarded in the song Best Run of the Year with the theme Carrillo Airline.

Also, Ortiz was part of the grand opening ceremony by singing his first song of the evening Go Now as a tribute to Valentín Elizalde and presenting the “Collaboration of the Year” award with Carolina Ross and his brother Kevin Ortiz.

Ending his participation in this delivery Gerardo sang his current success entitled More Expensive Than Yesterday.