President Trump has been the top of the news from the time he declared he was running for a second presidential term – after, what he claims, his second term chance was stolen by the Democrats, fearing that he would dismantle what he calls the Deep State. The Deep State is said to be the government behind the government – the bureaucracy.
Some reports have described the DS as the federal bureaucracy comprised of over 10,000 unelected federal employees who are the real runners of the government, bureaucrats whose federal jobs are almost perpetual.
“The presidents change, but nothing really changes,” some say, “because those bureaucrats who are settled in their jobs protect the status quo set by the powerful elite.”
Of several ongoing criminal cases that have been cooking to jail or stop Trump from becoming president again, this one will be the first one to go the front burner, attracted me for containing elements that for me, don’t go with reality.
“On Monday, Oct. 2, President Trump’s New York fraud trial will start, court says—after judge rules he inflated his assets,” read the headline of Forbes, the American business magazine.
This headline prompted me to write about it, given that my understanding is that a judge should be impartial, not biased.
If the judge declared that Trump was guilty before a trial, why then will he be tried if he has already been tried by the judge statement?
As I followed the story on YouTube and read on the comments below, I found many that made really sense and made me understand better, that this charges against Trump are nothing more than an intent of breaking a true believer who really believes that the United States is being destroyed and that he has to intervene to save it. No matter the consequences to his person and his wealth.
That he inflated his assets in order to get better loans, is a matter of interpretation by experts, some say, and here go some of those comments:
– @kathymayberry8830
I never knew that a person could go in and tell the bank the amount their assets were worth and the bank would take you at your word. We are talking huge amounts here and I doubt the bank loaned PRESIDENT TRUMP money on these assets unless the did their win research. If they loaned money on hearsay, that is their problem.
– @waynepaschall2603
I know every loan that I believe ALL people have requested or applied for had to be approved by the lender and they control the entire process. You will only get what a independent appraisal will allow
– @johngallegos8655
Lét hope the Attorney General is ready to go after every business that inflate their business at time of sale.
– @covercalls88
The average person out there does not really understand how the property appraisal value can be altered especially if it used for business. It takes a CPA to really explained it. In CA many houses bought and transferred under the Prop. 13 rules can be worth millions, yet be assessed at one quarter their value.
– @DavidJames.82
I guess some appraisers from the bank are going to jail.
– @ssvsssjs
Don’t lenders do due diligence before they make loan? Wouldn’t they be in a position to know whether the valuations were appropriate? Was anyone harmed by these supposed over valuations. Why did the DA even feel the need to investigate?
– @skylarc6063
I love how they claim beachfront property Mar A Lago is only worth $18 million. Other mansions of 1/10th the size go for $40 million. Even if you take into account the fact that Trump signed an agreement to prohibit the development of the property and only use it as a country club, 18 million is a joke.
– @benproffitt5957
How can a judge make a ruling before the case begins? Kind of skipping due process isn’t she?
– @ericeandco
Gotta say inflating assets was a pretty common practice for lots of business people, especially developers, for quite a number of years. Why is it an issue now? Did he default on the loans? Why didn’t the bank do the most basic confirmation of the information or require a certified appraisal?
