by Josep Miró i Ardèvol
The gender perspective is a determining ideology in Spanish politics. In Catalonia it has managed to get the Comissió d’Estudi del Procés Constituent to impose it as a compulsory doctrine of the future Catalan constitution, even before debating it in a patchwork of the tied and well tied of Francoism.
Gender ideology spreads through extraordinary confusion about its meaning. Some understand it as an innocuous substitution of the grammatical concept of sex, masculine and feminine. It is a visible error in the presentation of statistical data. Quite a lot more they conceive it as the relationship of equality between men and women, and in this sense it is perceived as a feminism.
But in reality it is a political ideology, such as Marxism, or communism, which pursues power, and cultural and social hegemony. It arises from an approach that destroys the objective concept of human nature, substituting it for the subjective drive of sexual desire elevated to a political category. Denies all truth to other conceptions, which pursues through censorship, repression, personal and media disqualification. It promotes the camouflage of the economic causes of inequality, and by eroding the meaning of being human, prepares the mentalities for posthumanism.
It is not a feminism because it does not contemplate the real woman, nor does she worry about the equity situation of all of them. Thus, the two largest groups, mothers and widows, have never been part of their demands, but the equal proportion in the electoral lists, regardless of any other criteria. It is only interested in the woman as long as it fits in with its theory, which is based on the imitation of a heterosexual man, even if it means losing years of life expectancy, and conflict with him, in a patchwork of the class struggle.
The gender perspective is not interested in real equity. Manipulates reality to present our society as patriarchal, and phallocratic (sic), dominated by heterosexual males. But ignores aspects as decisive for the person as life expectancy and education, because there are many more female university graduates than men under 35 years, more male than female ninis, many more suicides, repeaters, abandonment and school failure among the guys, that in the girls. It introduces a distorted approach to equity by diluting the economic and educational causes of inequality in the “gender conflict”. The paradigm was the Ministry of Equality of Rodríguez Zapatero. A social democratic government that created a ministry for equality without any economic function, focused only on the conflict between the “woman class”, homosexuals, bisexuals, etc., against the “heterosexual male class”.
But it is not about opposing feminine inequalities (or) other masculine ones. The point is to overcome them in terms of people, of citizens, in each concrete objective situation. Everything else is playing the game of inequality, and the elite that lives installed in it.
But the gender perspective is something much more confusing and destructive than all that. This was exemplified by the ex Congresswoman of the United States Bella Abzug in 1995 at the Beijing Conference, when she affirmed that “the term gender has been differentiated from the word sex to express the reality that the situation and the roles of women and men are social constructions subject to change”. In this ideology there is no man and woman as a consequence of their nature. Only cultural construction counts, which gives rise to changing subjects at will. It is the empire of subjectivity, of untying. A person whose biology categorizes her as a woman may have a male gender identity and be attracted erotically and affectively by men. And conversely, and all the variations that are wanted, which can also be modified at will throughout life. All this results in a great fragmentation.
The unity of the human being in its specificity of man and woman has been transformed into a multitude of identities that demand its political recognition, and the existence of ¬specific rights and prerogatives along with heterosexuals: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, transgender , transvestite and intersexual, which can reach 31 according to the Human Rights Commission of the city of New York, or even 58 (or are only 50?) as Facebook offers. Confused? This is the gender perspective.
The ideology of the genre means the destruction of our civilization. A just society and its economy can not survive this confusion, disorder, arbitrariness and persecution of man because they destroy the foundations of nature, its anthropological understanding, its cultural manifestation, and with it the social institutions that, like the family, are necessary for our common life.
